The URL can be used to link to this page

700 MAIN ST.0 -PREVENTION FIRE" SNOHO J ServingBrier,,Edtnonds, ana -1-2425-Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT 0 EDMONDS Mountlake Terrace Everett, WA 98208 0 BRIER FIRE Phone (425) 551-1200 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE DISTRwww.FireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272 0 UNINCORPORATED 700 Main Street Bldg 98020 %E%fajCY STAf?V SHIFT LOCATION: BUSINESS NAME: Frances Anderson Center PHONE: 4257710230 SCHEDULED Dec 210115 DATE DUE 121 203 MAILING 700 Main Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 LIFIR 0 ADDRESS: City Of Edmonds BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: Renee 2062804998 EMERGENCY-1: HOME PHONE: URRENT KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YE� NO., BUSINESS EMAIL: LICENSE EJ 11' PERSON CONTACTED: A) F: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: -12-00-00 AIVI Date Last Serviced: HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 2 2 PA- I A) Y- 3 q T 4 4 5 5 j 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE AB(;� VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 301DAYS 1st RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION FINAL RE -INSPECT ION EXTENSION VIOLATIONS DATE DUE: qRANTEDTb: DATE DUE:, DATE DUE: CITED: PERSON PERSON PERSON CONTACTED: CONTACTED CONTACTED: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 �INSPECTOR. DATE: Z_ DATE DATE: 3 ViOL��TI614S f VIOLATIONS i I CITATION ISSUED ,.-PRE-CITATION i 4 5 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER CODE 5 2 6 2 6 DATE SECTION RETURN RECEIPT 3 7 3 7 RECEIVED 6 DISPOSITION 4 4 8 DATE: LETTERNE�gDI�D F=1-YES []*NO LETTER NEEDED YES NO 8 SNOHOMISE FIR 7 Sereving Brier, EdmQnds;'and Mountlake Terrace Twww.FireDistric) 12425 Meridian Ave S kverett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 551-1200 Fax (425) 551-1272 FIRE PREVENTION, INSPECTION REPORT 0 EDMONDS 0 BRIER 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 0 UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT LOCATION: 700 Main Street Bldg 98020 Annual 17-P BUSINESS NAME: Frances Anderson C -enter PHONE: 4257710230 SCHEDULED DATE DUE o Dec 2015 MAILING LIFIR 11, 121 203 ADDRESS: 700 Main S�treet, Edmonds, WA 98020 BUSINESS -OWNER: City Of Edmonds HOME PHONE: EMERGENCY-1 Renee 0\C HOME PHONE: 2062804998 NT KEY ACCESS-2: EMAIL: v w 01— 6 HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO BUSINESS El R LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: 9/1 'F FIRE SYSTEMS: AS �L�/1'3),E 4/43 FD LkBox �711_&V-1�_ 14 kA C I L c, I,) 1-C), �et Date Last Serviced: V HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS A_ T-rrr,�W_-4- k_pt: 7-3112- '9 'A;k(4-P �ZVl_ T 2 1 1-, %N h Ijo 2 4-n AA.A 1 -7— C-1 7- 16 -6 3 )&c�!ls� a 7 I�A 5 5 0—V 6 nfi 6 7 �77t_ I �_Iw�. pl) 7 I AGREE To, CbRRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATIO'N(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION L 2nd RE-INSPECTI07 EXTENSION FINAL RE -INSPECTION VIOLATIONS DATE DUE: 11�ww D'A'TE DUE': GRANTEDTO: DATE DUE: CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: I �NSPECTOR INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: P17 ZW4561 DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS' CITATION ISSUED PRE -CITATION 4 5 5 LETTER SENT NUMBE R: DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 6 RETURN RECEIPT 3 7 3 7 RECEIVED DISPOSITFON: 7 8 4 8 DATE: \"LETTER NE EDED El YES NO LETTER NEEDED [-] YES NO 8 1. John J. Dowling From: Kevin Zweber Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 7:31 AM To: 'Sullivan, Thom' Cc: John J. Dowling;'McRae, Renee' Subject: RE: Francis Anderson Center Fire Inspections Thom, I trust what your telling me is true, a re -inspection will not be required. We will document at our end that the corrections have been made. Thanks, Kevin Zweber Deputy Chief - Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Services Snohomish County Fire District I Proudly serving the Cities of Brier, Edmonds, and Mountlake Terrace 425-771-0213 Office 425-231-3644 cell From: Sullivan, Thom [mailto:Thom.SuIIivan@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 3:17 PM To: Kevin Zweber Cc: John 1. Dowling Subject: RE: Francis Anderson Center Fire Inspections Hi Kevin, James our City Electrician has notified me that we are ready for re -inspection at the Frances Anderson Center. Thanks for your patience on this, Thom Sullivan Facilities Manager City of Edmonds 425-27S-4515 x 1379 From: Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address) Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 7:52 AM To: Sullivan, Thom Cc: Dowling, John (Fire District Address) Subject: RE: Francis Anderson Center Fire Inspections Thanks Thom. That sounds like a workable plan for us. Yes, please let us know when it is complete. Kevin Zweber Deputy Chief - Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Services Snohomish County Fire District I Proudly serving the Cities of Brier, Edmonds, and Mountlake Terrace 425-771-0213 Office 425-231-3644 cell From: Sullivan, Thom [mai Ito: Thom. Sul liva n Oed mondswa. gov] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 7:46 AM To: Kevin Zweber Subject: RE: Francis Anderson Center Fire Inspections Hi Kevin, Yes we are hoping to have all of the emergency lighting operational (new and existing) by 11/30/16. Do you want me to reach out to you when it is complete for reinspection? Let me know, Thanks, Thom From: Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address) Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:43 AM To: Sullivan, Thom Subject: RE: Francis Anderson Center Fire Inspections Thom, Does your reply confirm that you will be correcting the issues shortly? Kevin Zweber Deputy Chief - Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Services Snohomish County Fire District 1 Proudly serving the Cities of Brier, Edmonds, and Mountlake Terrace 425-771-0213 Office 425-231-3644 cell From: Sullivan, Thom (maiIto:Thom.Su11ivanC@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:58 PM To: Kevin Zweber Subject: RE: Francis Anderson Center Fire Inspections Hi Kevin, Thanks for the clarification. Thom From: Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address) Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:24 AM To: Sullivan, Thom Cc: Williams, Phil; Rolfe, James Subject: RE: Francis Anderson Center Fire Inspections Thom, 2 -No standard has changed on exit and egress lighting. I am just requesting that anything currently in place be operating properly. Thanks, Kevin Zweber Deputy Chief - Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Services Snohomish County Fire District 1 Proudly serving the Cities of Brier, Edmonds, and Mountlake Terrace 425-771-0213 Office 425-231-3644 cell From: Sullivan, Thom [mailto:Thom.Suilivan@)edmondswa.ciov] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 9:49 AM To: Kevin Zweber Cc: Williams, Phil; Rolfe, James Subject: Re: Francis Anderson Center Fire Inspections Hi Kevin, We have been making some progress on this new egress and exit lighting standard that was set after that last inspection. Unfortunately this type of work is very labor intensive and requires power to areas without existing supply. We have done 1S or so thus far and have a contractor quote to install the rest over the next three months. We would be happy to give you progress reports as we get moving with the contractor in the next couple weeks. I apologize for the delay but and I am completely aware of the importance of egress lighting. Thank you for your support, and let me know if you have any questions. Thom Sent from my iPhone On Oct 4, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address) <kzweber@firedistrictl.org> wrote: Hi Thom, One of our Deputy Fire Marshal's was following up on the inspections conducted at Francis Anderson. The exit and egress lighting needs to be maintained. The original inspection was conducted quite some time ago, with follow up. Normally we allow 30 days for compliance but I suspect you weren't aware of the issues until recently. Exit and Egress lighting if vitally important in all occupancies but specifically in an Assembly with large occupant loads and visitors of all ages. Could you please take care of the issues. Thanks, Kevin Zweber Deputy Chief - Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Services Snohomish County Fire District 1 Proudly serving the Cities of Brier, Edmonds, and Mountlake Terrace 425-771-0213 Office 425-231-3644 cell Fire Protection Con tract6r;.."Oince 1930 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 3434 FIrst'A"; So., Seattle, - WA 9'P'13J'4*, 206.622.4656 WA.: VI-KI-NA-S373NT LEVEL M 602 California Way, Longview, WA 98632,360,425.7620 Fire Sprinkler Inspection Report Page: 1 of 2 REPORT TO:1%��Irc� S JOB NO. 11U16-1 45 IV S D AT E STREET: -74%0 mAZA) 5T BLDG. / LOCATION: 90, IA-,e;7 CITY/STATE: 9Z[VVA10_S INSPECTOR: k�;Ij I.GENERAL a. Is the building occupied ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . 7 b. Is occupancy the same as previous Inspection ? . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. Are all systems In service ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . d. Are all fire protection systems the same as last Inspection ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a. Is the building completely sprinklered ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - f. Are all now additions and building changes properly protected ? - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. . . . . . g. Is all stock or storage properly below sprinkler piping ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . h. Was property free of fires since Iasi Inspection ? (Explain any fire on Page 2) ... . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. In areas protected by wet systems,'Is building pro . perly heated, I.e.: blind afts, perimeter areas, and are all exterior openings protected against the cold ? 2. CONTROL VALVE (See Section 17) a. Are all sprinkler system main control valves open ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... .. . . b. Are all other control. valves In proper position ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . c. Are all control valves In good condition and sealed or supervised ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. WATER SUPPLIES (See Section 18) a. Was a water flow test preformed and were the results satisfactory ? . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . 4. TANKS, PUMPS. & FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS -a. Are fire pumps, gravity tanks, resevoirs and pressure tanks In good condftlo I n and properly maintained ? .. . . . . . . . . . . . b. . Are Fire Department Connections In satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps In place and check valves tight 7T105ffQ ��l WET SYSTEMS. (See Section 13) a. Are cold weather valves open or closed as necessary ? - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- b. Have antifreeze systems been tested and left In satisfactory condition ? Temp. ? . . . . . . . . . . . .. . c. Are alarm valves, water flow Indicators and retard chambers In satisfactory condition ? . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 6. DRY SYSTEMS (See Section 14) a. Are dry valve(s) In service and'in good condition.? . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Are pressure and priming water levels normal ? - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - . . . . . . . c. Is air compressor In good condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d. Were low points drained during fall and winter Inspections ? - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -- - a. Are Quick- opening devices In service ? . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . Has piping been checked for stoppage within the past ten (10) years ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . ... . . . . g. Has pipi ng been checked for proper pitch within the past five (5) years ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . ... . h. Have dry valves been trip tested satisfactorily as required ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- I - - - - - - - - - - 1. Are dry valves adequately protected from freezing ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Are valve house and heater conditions satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - ----- 7. SPECIAL SYSTEMS (See Section 16) a. Were valves tested as required ? -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - I b. Were all heat -responsive systems tested and were the results satisfactory ? _* - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Were supervisory features tested and were the results satisfactory ? - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8. ALARMS a. Is the water motor and gong test satisfactory ? . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Is the electric alarm test satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ode: c. Is the supervisory alarm service test satisfactory ? Monitoring Co. Ph.: 1W- 'C 9. SPRINKLERS - PIPING a. Are all sprinkler heads In good condition, n ot obstructed. and free from corrosion or loading ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - b. Are all sprinkler heads less . than fifty.(50) years old? Head Manufacturer: Date of head WHFTE: VIKING COPY YELLOW: INVOICE COPY PINK: FIRE DEPARTMEW COPY -GO,LD: BUILDING.COPY .. ! .!! ;r- I '�.V' "� 4'. 1,p Fire Protection Cont rx AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 3434 RWAva So., Seaffle, W98 WA.: VWJ-JUq37ZVT; LEVEL I/V 602 Caftmig WW .- LongvIeW WA Fire !Snrinkler Insn tion Ranort Iors since 1930 i34,206. 622.4656 OW, JISO. 425. 7620 Parlas 9nf 9 9. SPRINKLER / PIPING (Continued) YES NA. NO c. Are extra sprinkler heads readily available ? .. . . . . . . —2b% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d. Is condition of piping, drain valves, check valves, hangers, ;;r;e;aaU:—open sprinklers, and strainers sattlaclIM ? . . a. Are all sprinklers of proper temperature rating? . . '.., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f. Are portable fire extinguishers In good condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I g. Is hand hose on sprinkler systems satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F 10. Date Dry System Piping last checked for stoppage .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11. Date Dry System Piping last checked for proper pitch - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12. Date Dry Pipe Valve last trip tested -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - fly kP- ZAA Ot I 14 IQA;D 13. Wet systems: Number. Make Model Year !9 -"J0 14. Dry Systems: Number: Make Model Year 15. Accelerator: Make / Model I Year: 16. SpecialSystems: Number: —Type: Make I Model / Year Condition-: 17. CONTROL VALVES a. City Connection Control Valves - - - - - - b. Tank Control Valves - - - - - - - - - c. Pump Control Valves - - - - - - - - - d. Sectional Control Valves - . . . . . . . 9. System Control Valves - - - - - - - - I& WATERFLOWTEST a. Water Pressure Source: VC[ty, 13 Tank 13 Fire Pump, Water Fl ow Test taken ? -Y� If not, reason: Test Pipe Location Size Test Pipe Pressure Before Flow Press ure Pressure After AT I . 19. Explanation of any "No" answers: 1 20. Recent changes In building occupancy or fire protection equipment: 21. Adjustments or corrections made: 22. Desirable Improvements: 23. Has building owner / representative been notified of any deficiency to the fire protection system? 0 Yes 0 No, Person notified: If answer Is "No",explain: 24. Inspector's Signatur Witness (property owner lessee) and date: WHrrE: VIKING COPY YELLOW: INVOICE COPY PINK: FIRE DEPARTMENT.COPY GOLD: BUILDING COPY ,�- ( I ISI, ly� I-Lvo r-jo f-V Lv-/-/ OGZ- W Wesffall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:38 PM To: l3jorback, Leif Subject: RE: Main Street Kids Leif: Because this is a licensed daycare facility, I'm confident that an emergency plan is in place for the caregivers who are responsible for the welfare of the kids. The exit is solely dedicated to the daycare and the gate does prevent the kids from running out in the street when the door opens and until the parents arrive to pick the child. I approved a similar "routing" arrangement at Edmonds Elementary where they closed some exterior gates to direct the kids in orderly fashion to the bus waiting area. The exiting paths were still provided even though the path was obviously longer. This was a school -initiated process and I was confident that proper care and awareness was being conducted from principal. John Westfall Edmonds Fire Marshal ----- Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 1:15 PM To: l3jorback, Leif Subject: RE: Main Street Kids Leif: Let me stew upon. I'm not so immediately concerned due to the caregivers that are running the day to day operations at daycare. John Westfaill Edmonds Fire Marshal ----- Original Message ----- From: l3jorback, Leif Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:23 AM To: Westfall, John; Smith, Mike Cc: Yarberry, Leonard Subject: FW: Main Street Kids John and Mike, You may want to weigh in after looking at the attached photo. Leif Bjorback Assistant Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x1 380 From: Zulauf, JoAnne Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:31 AM To: Machuga, Jen; Bjorback, Leif Subject: FW: Main Street Kids The photo is attached here. From: McRae, Renee Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 5:33 PM To: Zulauf, JoAnne Subject: Main Street Kids JoAnne Phil suggested that I start my conversation with you, so if that is incorrect please forward me on. Main Street Kids is a tenant at the FAC. Their main entrance/exit door is off Dayton Street. After the Newtown shootings they paid for us to beef up the access to their area by adding keypads. They would like an awning over this door. Jim Stevens and I looked at the area and also looked at the other awnings on the FAC. It doesn't appear that they have a lot of room for this, but we would like to accommodate this request if possible. I need an opinion about what could be done and what is needed from me to move forward. I have attached a picture of the back door. Thanks. << File: MSK entrance.jpg >> Ren6e McRae Recreation Manager City of Edmonds 1 700 Main Street I Edmonds WA 98020 425.771.0232 1 425.771.0253 (F) I renee.mcrae@edmondswa.gov Register online anytime at www.reczone.o Check out our Proc iram quide Al FIRE PREVENTION Sei-ving-BrierEdinonds-, 12425Met-idianAveS INSPECTION REPORT SNOHOMISH CO. Mouhildk&'T�rrace, and IRE Everett, WA 98208 DEDMONDS 0 BRIER the 7bwn:4,,.Wbodwqyw DIST Rlf4T -:,z Phone (425) 551-1200 E]WOODWAY [:1 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE www.FireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551�4272 0 UNINCORPORATED 7 - " FREOUENCY STATION & SHIFT_*) LOCATION: 700 Main Street '365 17 D BUSINESS NAME: Frances Anderson Center PHONE: 4257710230 SCHEDULED 1 Zj DATE DUE 01112 MAILING 700 Main St LIFIR ll� 121 120,01 ADDRESS: Edmonds 98020 BUSINESS OWNER: City Of Edmonds HOME PHONE: 4257- _5252'5 OCC LID 993 77/-&,',ZS EMERGENCY-1: MehiWeh-Brian- HOME PHONE: 425T4213M CURRENT-. KEY ACCESS-2: 61 r r 4-tl HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO BUSINESS LICENSE K PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: 14�,e7S'04, FIRE AS 8/12 FA 8/10 FD LkBx FIE fj SYSTEMS: ANNUAL HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS A14 eliCK,_e =5;&L-_ q & CO- yv) r-Ph,",01ILP P(A51-1 m �-6 UlAcK h -a j .2 2 3 3 4 4 5 1 5 6 6 7 I..AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOV E VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X lst RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION FINAL RE -INSPECTION 1, EXTENSION VIOLATIONS DATE'DUE: DATE DUE: GRANTED TO: DATE DUE: CITED: PERSON PERSON PERSON CONTACTED: CONTACTED: CONTACTED: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 3 DATE: L_( ::� DATE: DATE: I IONS VIOLATIONS PRE -CITATION CITATION ISSUED 1 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER: 4 CODE 5 2 6 2, 6 DATE: SECTION: RETURN RECEIPT 3 7 3 7 RECEIVED 6 DISPOSITION: 4 8 4 18 DATE: LETTER NEEDED C] YES I_] NO LETTERNEEDED [-] YES E] NO FIRE DEPARTMENT,COPY 'ti -p- 4,:� ........... 7, 7 LU - Lij j3 Qo CL 0 U>j Ir jw!, Azi, Zt&- �ml- 11. 111,!, =,�, c - to 41 .1 tV P)o ORU If nii -2 71 rl 4K , PLI- lit g Qj IT jj,� : I APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR MATERIALS OR PROCESSES January 3, 2012 Please verify and correct the following information: Name of Company (DBA): COE Frances Anderson Center Edmonds Location : 700 Main Street In conformity with the terms of the -International Fire Code, application is hereby made to store, use Places of Assembly - Occupant Load: 998 or maintain the following activity, storage or pro- cesses: c/o City Of Edmonds Mailing Address: Director of Parks and Rec Edmonds, WA 98020 EFD UFIR #: (for office use) 2099981213203 Your Signature 'Q Your Name (print) dj_)4� S. (,j Your Title I �'725- S PkAA�, 44 4, Please make corrections, attach $40 payable to the City of Edmonds and mail to: Fire Marshal Department of Fire Prevention 121 _5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Rec'd Check# 77- FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT '25 M Serving Brier, Edmonds 1 12-4 eridian Ave S SNOHbMf.SH CO. OEDMONDS untlake Terraceand E�erett, WA 98208. 0 BRIER IR 0 0WOODWAY m the Town of Woodway Phone (42-5) 551-1200 [1 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE IST r ww,w.FireDistrictl. org Fax (425) 551-1272 0 UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY I STATION & SHIFF"� LOCATION: 700 Main'Street 365 17 C BUSINESS NAME: Frances Anderson Center PHONE: 4257710230 SCHEDULED DATE DUE 1` 12101111 MAILING 700 Main St UFIR � 121 1203 ADDRESS: Edmonds 98020 BUSINESS OWNER: City Of Edmonds HOME PHONE: 4257752525 OCC LD 993 EMERGENCY-1: HOME PHONE: 4257423370 CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2- HOME PHONE: — CITY YES NO BUSINESS El 0 LICENSE K PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: FIRE AS 6/11 FA 8/10 FD L�13x FE '7L I I SYSTEMS: otd, .042— ANNUAL HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 1 AG�EE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X lst RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION D E DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: -DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 15 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 4 8 4 DATE: DISPOSITION: 7 LETTER NEEDED [] YES No -8 LETTER NEEDED C] YES NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT -� T, January 1, 2011 209-998-1213-203 December 31, 2011 Date of Issue UFIR Number Date of Expiration I This PERMIT is issued to: I COE Frances Anderson Center located at: 1700 Main Street Edmonds, WA I To engage in the business, occupation or pr cess of: I I And shall constitute permission to maintain, store, use or handle materials or to conduct process which produce conditions hazardous to life or property or to install equipment used in connection with such activities as follows: Places of Assembly - Occupant Load: 998 I Allowed Occupant Load: 1 99 Pursuant to the provisions of the International Fire Code, any violation of the Code may be grounds for the revocation of this PERMIT. This permit does not take the place of any license required by law and is not transferable. Any change in the use or occupancy of premises shall require a new permit. of Fire Pr6ention This Permit Must Be Posted AtAll Times in The Premises Identified Above City of Edmonds Community Development Code 19.25.020 Uri&Fire Protection Contractors since 1930 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANjY, 3434 First A". So., Seattle, WA 98134, 206.622.4656 '11 WA.: VI-KI-NA-S373NT LEVEL I// , tl� - 602 California Way, Longview, WA 98632,360,425.7620 Fire Sprinkler Inspection Report Page:lof2 REPORT TO: JA Id 4 rd� 10. NO. DATE: STREET: _7/'y".0 W1. i., BLDG. / LOCATION:-*Z CITY/ STATE,: INSPECTOR: 00- I.GENERAL YES N.A. NO a. Is the building occupied ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _e_ - b. Is occupancy the same as previous Inspection ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Are all systems In service ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d. Are all fire protection systems the same as last Inspection ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a. Is the building completely sprinklered ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f. Are all new additions and building changes properly protected ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - g. Is all stock or storage properly below sprinkler piping ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . h. Was property free of fires since last Inspection ? (Explain any fire on Page 2) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - L In areas protected by wet systems, Is building properly heated, I.e.: blind attics, perimeter areas, and are all exterior openings protected against the cold ? 2� 2. CONTROL VALVES (See Section 17) ';X a. Are all sprinkler system main control valves open ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Are all other control valves In proper position ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Are all control valves In good condition and sealed or supervised ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. WATER SUPPLIES (See Section 18) a. Was a water flow test preformed and were the results satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. TANKS, PUMPS, & FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS a. Are fire pumps, gravity tanks, resevoirs and pressure tanks In good condition and properly maintained ? - - - - - b. Are Fire Department Connections In satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps In place and check valves tight ? 25 5. WET SYSTEMS (See Section 13) a. Are cold weather valves open or closed as necessary ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Have antifreeze systems been tested and left In satisfactory condition ? Temp. ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Are alarm valves, water ft ' ow Indicators and retard chambers In satisfactory condition ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6. DRY SYSTEMS (See Section 14) a. Are dry valve(s) In service and In good condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Are pressure and priming water levels normal ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c. Is air compressor In good condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d. Were low points drained during fall and winter Inspections ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a. Are Quick- opening devices In service ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f. Has piping been checked for stoppage within the past ten (10) years ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - g. Has piping been checked for proper pitch within the past live (5) years ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - h. Have dry valves been trip tested satisfactorily as required ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1. Are dry valves adequately protected from freezing ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Are.valve house and heater conditions satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. SPECIAL SYSTEMS (See Section 16) a. Were valves tested as required ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Were all heat -responsive systems tested and were the results satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Were supervisory features tested and were the results satisfactory ? - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8. ALARMS I NNW a. Is the water motor and gong test satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X b. Is the electric alarm test satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X Code: c. Is the supervisory alarm service test satisfactory? MonitoringCo. P'&4je-_VIQ^ Ph.:"*2.1 9. SPRINKLERS - PIPING a. Are all sprinkler heads In good condition, not obstructed and free from corrosion or loading ? b. Are all sprinkler heads less than fifty (50) years old? Head Manufacturer:- e"ej'fW_d - - - D_ataof_haad_:_' )391 WHITE: VIKING COPY YELLOW: INVOICE COPY PINK: FIFIEDEPARTIVIENT, COPY GOLD: BUILDING COPY Fire Protection Contractors since 1936.�,,', 'N� 3434RtWA Sd.SeaftWA98134,206. 622.4656 602CaftwifeW 111,350.425.7601 V, LongvhW IYA Il F F, Fire Sprink,ler Inspection Report, i,, Page:W2 4 9. SPRINKLER PIPING (Continued) 44 YES N.A. NO c. Are extra sprinkler has ds readily available ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - --- d. Is condition of piping, drain valves, check valves, hangars, p ure gauges open sprinklers, and strainers iaittact6ry ? Ic'; a. Are all sprinklers of proper temperature rating? . . . . . I . t ', '_ � . - - - - - --- - - - - Ile f. Are portable fire extinguishers In good condition ? . . . . . ..... . . . g. Is hand hose on sprinkler systems satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - I -- - - - - - - - - - - I I >C1 10. Date Dry System Piping last cl6cked for stoppage .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . — ---- - - - - - - - - - - & 4F, 11. Date Dry System Piping last chocked for proper plich -- - - - - - - - - - - - - . . ... . . . . . . . 12. Date Dry Pipe Valve last trip tested .. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - 13. Wet systems: Number Make Model I Year OF 14. Dry Systems: Number: Make Model I Year: 15. Accelerator: Make / Model / Year: 16.. Special Systems: Number: -Type: Make / Model / Year: Condition 17. CONTROL VALVES a. City Connection Control Valves - - - - - - b.Tank Control Valves - - - - - - - - - c. Pump Control, Va lves:�,, 'd.. Sectional Control Valves - - - - - - - - - a. System Control Valves - _� - - - - - - - Number Type pen Ye.0 No Secured Yes No Closed Yes No ;n Vass" No Condftlon! I& WATER FLOW TEST a. Water Pressure Source vqcIty, DTank, 0 FIrePump, Water Flow Test taken? A4eslf not, reason: Test Pipe Location Sbe Test Pipe,..,, Pressure Before Flow Pros ure Pressure After 7- F; ZJ#/ :2 75� 19. Explanation of any "No" answers: 20. Recent changes In building occupancy or fire protection equipment: 21. Adjustments or corrections made: 22. Desirable Improvements: 23.. Has building owner / representative been notified of any deficiency to the fire protection system? 0 Yes 0 No, Person notified: If answer is "No",explain: 24. Inspector's Signature: ?:fR;Z - Witness (property owner / lessee) and date: COPY YELLOW: INVOICE Copy PINK: FIRE.DEPARTMENT COPY GOLD: BjUII81N9.COPY Fire Protection Contractors since 1930 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANYj'jj 3434 First �4ve. So., Seattle, WA 98134,206,622.4656 WA: VF-K1-NA-W73AfT LEVEL N 602California Way, Longview, WA 98632,360,425.7620 Fire Sprin r-Inspecition Report Page:.1 of 2' REPORTTO: —JOB NO. DATE: STREET: BLDG./ LOCATION; AV&,�,er7- MAI CITY/STATE: INSPECTOR: Ivic I u A T—unl a. Is the building occupied ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Is occupancy the same as previous Inspection ? . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . C. Are all systems In service ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d. Are all fire protection systems the same as last Inspection ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . a. Is the building completely sprinklered ? . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . f. Areell new additions and building changes properly protected ? . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . g. Is all stock or storage properly below sprinkler piping ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . h. Was property free of fires since last Inspection ? (Explain any fire on Page 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. In areas protected by wet systems, Is building properly heated, Le.: blind attics, perimeter areas, and are all exterior r inn protects r' against the cold? 2. CONTROL VALVES (See Section 17) a. Are all sprinkler system main control valves open ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . . ... . . b. Are all other control valves In proper position ? ... . . . . . . . . . . . c. Are all control valves In good condition and sealed or supervised ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3. WATER SUPPLIES (See Section 18) a. Was a water. flow test preformed and were the results satisfactory? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. TANKS, PUMPS, & FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS a. Are fire pumps, gravity tanks, resevoirs and pressure tanks In good condition and properly maintained ?. . . b. Are Fire Departm eck valves tight ?.7�4 ant Connections In satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps In place and ch . . . 5. WET SYSTEMS (See Section 13) a. Are cold weather valves open or closed as necessary ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . b. Have antifreeze systems been tested and left In satisfactory condition ? Temp. ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c. Are alarm valves, water flow Indicators and retard chambers In satisfactory condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . 6. DRY SYSTEMS (See Section 14) a. Are dry valve(s) In service and In good condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . b. Are pressure and priming water levels normal ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c. Is air compressor In good condition ? . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d. Were low points drained during fall and winter Inspections ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... a. Are Quick- opening devices In service ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . f. Has piping been checked for stoppage within the past ten (10) years ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . g. Has piping been checked for proper pitch within the post five (5) years ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . h. Have dry valves been trip tested satisfactorily as required ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Are dry valves adequately protected from freezing ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Are valve house and heater conditions satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 7. SPECIAL SYSTEMS (See Section 16) a. Were valves tested as required ? . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Were all heat -responsive syst . ems tested and were the results satisfa4tory 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c. Were supervisory features tested and were the results satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. ALARMS a. Is the water motor and gong test satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Is the electric alarm test satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . P . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . R c. Is the supervisory alarm service test satisfactor y ? Monitoring Co. Ph.: *0 'ZJ 9A4 Code: 2SZ_:�M 9. SPRINKLERS - PIPING a. Are all sprinkler heads In good condition, not obstructed and free from corrosion or loading ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Are all sprinkler heads less than fifty (SO) y#are.old? Head Manufacturer:— elzleot��l Date of head WHITE: VIKI'G 6OPY YELLOW: INVOICE COPY PINK: FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY GOLD: B UILDING COPY VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPA WA.: VWJ-NA-SMNT LEVEL Iff, Fire SDrinkler, i �.V_ ". 51 �Ie Fire Protection Contractors since 1930 MkRtait Am Sm, SeeM WA 98134, k*-. M. 4W 6W Qfta& WW, Laxp*w, WA ,3W.425.-7= ction Report Paiae: 2of 2 9. SPRINKLER / PIPING (Continued) YES N.A. NO c. Are extra sprinkler heads readily available ? d. Is condition of piping, drain valves, check valves, lfressure gauW' open sprinklers, and strainers satifectory ? Z*4z >< a. Are ell sprinklers of proper temperature rating? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >< f. Are portable fire extinguishers In good condition ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - g. Is hand hose on sprinkler systems satisfactory ? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10. Date Dry System Piping last checked for stoppage .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . 11. Date Dry System Piping last checked for proper pftch ----------------------------------- 4Q,,=7*_ 12. Date Dry Pipe Valve last trip tested -- - - - - - --- - -- . . . . . . . . . . 13. Wet systems: Number Make I Model / Year 40/ 14. Dry Systems: Number: Make / Model / Year IS. Accelerator: Make / Model Year: 16. SpeiialSystems: Number: -Type - Make / Model / Year: Condition 17. CONTROL VALVES 8.� ty Connection Control Vsives - - - - - b. Tank Control Valves - - - - - - - - - c. Pump Control Valves - - - - - - -- - - d. Sectional Control Valves . . . . . . . . . a. System Control Valves - - - - - - - - - I& WATER FLOW TEST a. Water Pressure 4.UrCO *j3:CIty, 13 Tank, 0 Fire Pump, Water Flow Test taken ? te��" not, reason: r,A 4est Pipe Location Size Test Pipe Pressure Before Flow Pros ure Pressure After Z� 17 -7;,19. Explanation of any "No" answers: 20. Recent changes In building occupancy or flre'protection equipment: 21. Adjustments or corrections made: 22. Desirable Improvements: 23. Has building owner / representative been notified of any deficiency to the fire protection system? 0 Yes 0 No, Person notified: If answer Is "No",explain.,: 24. Inspector's Signature: %. ) Witness (property owner / lessee) and date: WHITE: VIKING COPY , YELLOW: INVOICE COPY PINK: FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY GOLD:,BUILDING COPY SNOHOMISH CO., FIRE. DISTY ionds, and LOCATION: 700 Main Street eldg 98020 BUSINESS NAME: Frances Anderson Center MAILING ADDRESS-.'Z;/" 700 Main Streq'lEdmonds. WA 98020 FIRE PREVENTION 12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORTt, Everett, WA -98208, t EDMONDS 0 BR.l,ER Phone (425j'_53d§13�1'200 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE [I UNINCORPORATED Fax (425) 551-1272 0' FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFTls Annual 17-FP PHONE: 4257710230 SCHEDULED Dec 20133 DATE DUE UFIR 10 121 L BUSINESS OWNER: City Of Edmonds HOME PHONE: Emai!: EMERGENCY-1: KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE- E �PHONE..; HOM 9 _y & Q CURRENT YES NO CITY BUSINESS EMAIL: LICENSE PERS N CONTACTED: -A e- aL_ INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: FIRE,,SYSTEMS: AS W13 FA 0 FE FD Lk Box L/ _j Libu; HAZARDS F M NId IONS .PUND AND LOCATIONS / COm s 2 2 7"� 3 t 3 4 4 5- 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREEJO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X I st RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION EXTENSION FINAL RE -INSPECTION VIOLATIONS DATE DUE: DATE DUE: GRANTEDTO: DATE DUE: CITED: PERSON PERSON PERSON CONTACTED: CONTACTED: CONTACTED: 1 IN SPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS PRE -CITATION CITATION ISSUED 5 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER: CODE 5 2 6 2 6 DATE: SECTION: RETURN RECEIPT 6 3 3 7 RECEIVED DISPOSITION: j4 8 4 8 1 DATE: 7 CETTERNEEDE�.F] YES [I NO LETTER NEEDED E] YES [I NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY 0. Fire Protection Contractors since 1930 oil, VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY� 3434 First Ave. So., Seattle, WA 98134, 206.622.4656 WA.: VI-KI-NA-S373NT LEVEL M 602 California Way, Longview, WA 98632,360,425.7620 Fire Sprinkler Inspection Report Page:lof2 d11f1A4-"1 /Pool ?#51008 IV5Z 2117 REPORT TO:41JP" '60AJ V1 4 il J4 NO. DATE:. STREET: BLDG. / LOCATION:#/ Zi CITY / STATE: INSPECTOR: I.GENERAL 1i -- YES N.A. NO a. Is the building occupied ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - li� - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - X b. Is occupancy the same as previous Inspection ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - X c. Are all systems In service ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - d..'Are all fire protection systems the same as last Inspection ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . X a. Is the building completely sprinklered ? . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . f. Are all now additions and bu s propeiij protected ? - - - - - - - - - - --- I ]Ing change. - - - - - - - - - g. Is all stock or storage properly below sprinkler piping ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX h. Was property free of fires since last Inspection ? (Explain any fire on Page 2) . . . .. . . . .. . -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1. In areas protected by wet syste me, Is building properly heated, I.e.: blind, attics, perimeter areas, and are all exterior openings protected against the cold ? 2. CONTROL VALVES (See Section 17) a. Are all sprinkler system main control valves open ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IX b. Are all other control valves In proper position ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I . . . . . . . . . c. Are all control valves In good condition and sealed or supervised ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. WATER SUPPLIES (See Section 18) a. Was a water flow test preformed and were the results satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4. TANKS, PUMPS, & FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS a. Are fire pumps, gravity tanks, resevoirs and pressure tanks In good condition and properly maintained ? - - - b. Are Fire Department Connections In satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps In place and check valves tight 5. WET SYSTEMS (See Section 13) a. Are cold weather valves open or closed as necessary ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X b. Have antifreeze systems been tested and left In satisfactory condition ? Temp. ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Are alarm valves, water flow Indicators and retard chambers In satisfactory condition ? . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. DRY SYSTEMS (See Section 14) a. Are dry valve(s) In service and In good condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Are pressure and priming water levels normal ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Is air compressor In good condition.1 . . . . . -- - - - - - - - - --- --- - - --- - - t d. Were low points drained durIng1 fall and winter Inspections ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - e. Are Oulck- opening devices In service ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - I. Has piping been checked for stoppage within the past ten (10) years ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - g. Has piping been checked for proper pitch within the past five (5) years ? - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- 7_1 h. Have dry valves been trip tested satisfactorily as required ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1. Are dry valves adequately protected from freezing ? - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - Are valve house an d heater conditions satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7. SPECIAL SYSTEMS (See Section 16) a. Were valves tested as required ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Were all heat -responsive systems tested and were the results satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - c. Were supervisory features tested and were the results satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8. ALARMS a. Is the water motor and gong test satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Is the electric alarm test satisfactory ? . . .. . . . . . o. I, �' ;4 - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Is the supervisory alarm service test satisfactory ? Monitoring C Ph.: 20- 730 -9/14 Code: 211 'V-72- 9. SPRINKLERS - PIPING a. Are all sprinkler heads In good condition, not obstructed and free from corrosion or loading ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6'e b. Are all sprinkler heads less thin fifty (56) years old ? Head Manufacturer Date of head Z 4-- WHITE: VIKING COPY YELLOW: INVOICE COPY . PINK: FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY GOLD: BUILDING COPY Y" lleA p- Fire Frotectio'n Contractors' since 1930 viKING Auirommc SPRINKLER 60MOAN�J 34w, RrwAve. SaL, Seatft WA 98130,206. 622-4656 WA.: VI-KI-NA-S373NT LEVEL N 602 CaNkmia Way, Longview, WA 360.425.7620. Fire Sprinkler Inspection Report Page:.2of 2 9. SPRINKLER I PIPING (Continued) YES N.A. NO c. Are extra sprinkler heads readily available ? - - - - - - d. Is condition of piping, drain valves, check in open sprinklers, and strainers sattfactory ? 3hres, hangers, IEU—M---Pu 1; a. Are all sprinklers of proper temperature rating? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... * ... . . . . . . . I. Am portable tire extinguishers In good condition 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . - - - - - - - - - g. Is hand hose on sprinkler systems satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . --- ----- - - - - - - - 10. Date Dry System Piping last checked for stoppage. - . . . ... . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - 11. Date Dry System Piping last chocked for proper pfth -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- k --- - - - - --- - 12. Date Dry Pipe Valve last t I tested --------------- - 7 ------------------ 13., Wet systems: Number: Make Model Year /*Kz 14.: Dry Systems: Number: Make Model Year: 15. Accelerator: Make Model Year: .16. Special Systemin, Number: Type:.' Make / Model Year: Condition: 17. CONTROL VALVES !N6 a! City Connebtion Control Valves - - - - - - b. Tank'Co'ntro1\Valves -� . . . . ... . . c. Pump Control Valves - - - - - - - - - d. Sectlonal Control Valves - - - - * --- - - - - a. System Control Valves - ; - - - - - - - Or I& WATER FLOW TEST a. Water Pressure Source 0 Tank 0 Fire Pump, Water Flow Test taken'il!i;� If not, reason: Test Pipe Location Size Test Pipe Pressure Before Flow Pressure Pressure Aftei� 7- k1t. 19. Explanation of any."No" answers: -/0 20. Recent changes In building occupanc y or fire protection equipment: 41 21. Adjustments or corrections made: 22. Desirable Improvements: Has building owner / representative been notified of any deficiency to the fire protection system? 0 Yes, 0 No, Person notified: If answer is "No",explain: 24. Inspector's Signature: Witness (property owner / lessee) and date: W161111KINA011 YELLOW: INVOICE COPY * PINK: FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY GOLD: BUILDING COPyi W Fire Protection Contractors since 1930 VIKING A�TOMATIC SPRINKLER c6MPA'NY 3434* First A". So., Seattle, WA 98134, 206.622.4656 WA.: VI-KI-NA-W.73NT LEVEL N 602 California Way, Longview, WA 98632,360,425.7620 Fire Sprinkler -inspection Report Page:W2 REPORTTO: 'Okloew 5 JOB NO. 13"11 DATE: STREET: loo 14u/W Tr, BLDG./ LOCATION: y Cis Yk,17) INSPECTOR: CITY/ STATE < COAL I.GENERAL a. Is the building occupied ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Is occupancy the same as previous Inspection ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c. Are all systems in service ? -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- d. Are all fire protection systems the same as last Inspection ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a. Is the building completely sprinki.red ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - f. Are all new additions and building changes properly protected ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - g. Is all stock or storage properly below sprink! I er piping ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - h. Was property free of fires since last Inspectionk? I (Explain any fire on Page 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. In areas protected by wet systems, Is building property hosted, I.e.: blind attics, perimeter areas, and are all exterior openings protected against the cold ? 2. CONTROL VALVES (See Section 17) si� Are all sprinkler system main control valves open ? - ---- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Are all other control valves In proper pos ItIon ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Are all control valves In good condition anV,sealedmr supervised ? - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. WATER SUPPLIES (See Section 18) a. Was a water flow test preformed and were the results satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .4. TANKS, PUMPS, & FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS a. Are fire pumps, gravity tanks, resevoirs and pressure tanks In good condition and properly maintained ? - - - - - - - - - b� Are Fire Department Connections In satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps In place and check valves tight ?_ r 5. WET SYSTEM (See Section 13) a. Are cold weather valves open or closed as n�c6ssary ? - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Have antifreeze systems been tested, and left in satisfactory condition ? Temp.? - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - c. Are alarmvalves, water flow Indicators and . retard chambers In satisfactory conditio . n? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6. DRY SYSTEMS (See Section 14) a. Are dry valve(s) In service and In good condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Are pressure and priming water levels normal.? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Is air compressor In good condition ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - d. Were low points drained during fall and winter Inspections ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a. Are Quick- opening devices In service ? - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f. Has piping been checked for stoppage within the past ton (10) years ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - g. Has piping been checked for proper pitch with -in the past five (5) years ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - h. Have dry valves been trip tested satisfactorily as required ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1. Are dry valves adequately protected from freezing ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - 1. Are valve house and heater conditions satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7. SPECIAL SYSTEMS (See Section 16) a. Were valves tested as required ? - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Were all heat -responsive systems tested and were the results satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Were supervisory features tested and were the results satisfactory ? - -- - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .&ALARMS a. Is the water motor and gong test satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . b. Is the electric alarm test satisfactory ? . . . ... . . . . . c. Is the supervisory alarm service test satisfactory ?. Monitoring Co. I d'V fe P h.: '5"- 2 Z_2 Z C o d a: 7, 1 9. SPRINKLERS - PIPING a. Are all sprinkler heads In good condition, not obstructed and free from corrosion or loading ? --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Are all sprinkler heads less than fifty (50) yearsold ? Head Manufacturer: Date of head WHITE: VIKING COPY YELLOW: INVOICE COPY PINK: FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY GOLD: BUILDING COPY Fire Protection Contractors since 1930 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 3434 First Ave. So., Seattle, WA 98134, 206. 622. 4656 WA.: VI-KI-NA-S373NT LEVEL //1 602 Caffibmia Way, Longview, WA 96M, 360. 425. 7620 Fire,�prinkler Inspection Report Page:W2 9. SPRINKLER / PIPING (Continued) YES N.A. NO c. Are extra sprinkler heads readily available ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - d. Is condition of piping, drain valves, check valves, hangers, pressure gauges, open sprinklers, and strainers satifactory ? a. Are all sprinklers of proper temperature rating? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f. Are portable fire extinguishers in good condition ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - g. Is hand hose on sprinkler systems satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10. Date Dry System Piping last checked for stoppage -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11. Date Dry System Piping last checked for proper pitch - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12. Date Dry Pipe Valve last trip tested -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13. Wet systems: Number: Make Model / Yea'r: _/_-2z/A_AUL .&&a 14. Dry Systems: Number: Make Model / Year: 15. Accelerator: Make / Model / Year: 16: SpeclalSystems: Number: -Type: Make / Model / Year: Condition 17. CONTROL VALVES a. City Connection Control Valves - - - - - - b. Tank Control Valves - - - - - - - - - c. Pump Control Valves - - - - - - - - - d. Sectional Control Valves - - - - - - - - - e. System Control Valves - - - - - - - - - 18. WATERFLOWTEST a. Water Pressure Source: 0 City, 13Tank, 0 Fire Pump, Water Flow Test taken? -If not, reason: 9 Test Pipe Location Size Test Pipe Pressure Before Flow Pressure Pressure After 5__ -7 19. Explanation of any "No" answers: 20. Recent changes In building occupancy or fire protection equipment: Ze 44:e( e:9 f 21. Adjustments or corrections made: &Zkld,5�92 b e, 9 'ell e4 07751f )SOC, :7:WTWad41 A4f�_-b 3:3� ZM�4222�,Q / 06*0 5 --nro 22. Desirable Improvements: 23. Has building owner / representative been notified of any deficiency to the fire protection system? laAle"s 0 No, Person notified: If answer is "No",explain: 24. FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY !"*Flre Protection Contractors since 1930 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLIiR COMPANi 3434 First A". So., Seattle, WA 98134, 206.622.4656 WA.: VI-KI-NA-S373NT EVEL 602 California Way, Longview, WA 98632,360,425.7620 Fire Sprinkler Inspection R Dort Page:102 REPORT TO: JOBNO. W!�rlvlllo DATE: STREET: BLDG./ LOCATION: CITY/STATE: 1AA INSPECTOR: ar I.GENERAL a. Is the building occupied ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Is occupancy the same as previous Inspection ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . c. Are all systems In service ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d. Are all fire protection systems the same as last Inspection ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a. Is the building completely sprinklered ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I. Are all now additions and building changes properly protected ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. Is all stock or storage properly below sprinkler piping ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . h. Was property free of fires since last Inspection ? (Explain any fire on Page 2) . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. In areas protected by wet syste me, Is building properly heated, I.e.: blind attics, perimeter areas, and are all exterior openings protected against the cold ? 2. CONTROL VALVES (See Section 17) a. Are all sprinkler system main control valves open ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Are all other control valves In proper position ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c. Are all control valves In good condition and sealed or supervised ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . 3. WATER SUPPLIES (See Section 18) a. Was a water flow test preformed and were the results satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . 4. TANKS, PUMPS, & FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS a. Are fire pumps, gravity tanks, resevolre and pressure tanks In good condition and properly maintained ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Are Fire Department Connections In satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps In place and check valves tight ? . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. WET SYSTEM (See Section 13) a. Are cold weather valves open or closed as necessary ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Have antifreeze systems been tested and left In satisfactory condition ? Temp. ? . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . c. Are alarm valves, water flow Indicators and retard chambers In satisfactory condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. DRY SYSTEMS (See Section 14) a. Are dry valve(s) In service and In good condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Are pressure and priming water levels normal ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c. Is air compressor In good condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d. Were low points drained during fall and winter Inspections ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a. Are Oulck- opening devices In service ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . I. Has piping been chocked for stoppage within the past ton (10) years ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . g. Has piping been chocked for proper pitch within the past five (5) years ? .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . h. Have dry valves been trip tested satisfactorily as required ? -- - - - - - - - - - - 1. Are dry valves adequately protected from freezing ? . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Are valve house and heater conditions satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. SPECIAL SYSTEMS (See Section 16) a. Were valves tested as required ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Were all heat -responsive systems tested and were the results satisfactory ? . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . c. Were supervisory features tested and were the results satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. ALARMS a. Is the water motor and gong test satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Is the electric alarm test satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - c. Is the supervisory alarm service test satisfactory ? Monitoring Co. lit" , AA,f,_ Ph.:. 'code: 9. SPRINKLERS - PIPING a. Are all sprinkler heads In good condition, not obstructed and f roe from corrosion or 108 Ing ? - . . . . . . . rer /4, 111�� b. Are all sprinkler heads less than fifty (50) years old ? Head Manufactu Date of head . WHITE: VIKING COPY YELLOW: INVOICE COPY -PINK: FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY GOLD: BUILDINGQOPY,--- Ira '...�4i; Fire Protection Contractors since 1930 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY1, 34M FbWAm- Sa, SwM WA 96134,206. 622.4656 WA.: VAXi-M-S373NT �EWL Hi * 602 CAW01111116 MY, L0910111111% WA 98M, 360.425. 7620 Fire Sprinkler Inspection Report Page:W2 9. SPRINkLER PPIPING (Continued) YES NA. NO c. Are extra sprinkler hiods modify available ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . X d. Is condition of piping, drain valves, check valves, hangers, pressure gouges, open sprinklers, and strainers sattlactory ? . . . . . . . . . X a. Are all sprinklers of proper temperature rating? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I. Are portabWfIre extinguishers In good condition ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX g. Is hand hose on sprinkler systems - satisfactory ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10. Date Dry System Piping last chocked for stoppage .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -7— It. Date Dry System Piping last chocked for proper pitch .. . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A/ -X 12. Date Dry'Pipe Ve Ive last tri tested .. . . . . . . .. . I . --- / - - , - - /w/ - - ; /" / —,c 7 13. Wet systems: Number Make Model Year 14. Dry Systems: Number: Make Model Year: 15. Accelerator: Make i Model / Year: 16. SpecialSystems: Number: —Type: Make / Model / Year: Condition: 17. CONTROL VALVES a. City Connection Control Valves - - - - - - b. Tank Control Valves - - - - - - - - - c. Pump Control Valves - - - - - - - - - d. Sectional Control Valves . . . . . . . . . a. System Control Valves - ; . . . . . . . WMEAWN mmmmmmm=��W I& WATER FLOW TEST a. Water Pressure Source: O!Chy, 137ank, 13 Fire Pump, Water Flow Test taken ? J�dif not, mason: Test Pipe Location Size Test Pipe Pressure Before Flow Pressure Pressure After A 7- 73 /110 7-7 i i 19. Explanation of any "No" answers: A, A4 A-zol /,7 20. Recent changes In building occupancy or fire protection equipment: 21. Adjustments or corrections made: 22. Desirable Improvements: 23. Has building owner / representative been notified of any deficiency to the fire protection system? 13Yes 0 No,Person notified If answer Is "No",explain- 24. Inspector's Signature: AO" I r ->e==!= Witness (property owner / lessee) and date: W44 - // VIKING COPY YELLOW: INVOICE COPY PINK: FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY GOLD: BYILDING COPY CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 96020 - (425) 771-0215 1 FIRE DEPARTMENT S 700 Main Street LOCATION: BUSINESS NAME: Frances Anderson Center MAILING 700 Main St FIRE PREVENTION SAFETY SURVEY PHONE: 4257710230 ADDRESS: Edmonds 98020 4257752525 BUSINESS OV�NER: City Of Edmonds HOME PHONE: Mcintosh, Brian HOME PHONE: 4257423370 EMERGENCY-1: 1, I KEY ACCESS-2!. HOME PHONE: '_ FIR SO NC Y I STATff & glIFT SCHEDULED DATE DUE 01 lZ101/10 LIFIR 0- 12 1 1;203 OCC LD 998 r __ INITIAL INSPECTION �ATE PERSONCONT,�CTED: NAME OF INSPE e5lt'97- 7. FIRE 07 FD Lktjx FE _tKJ'Zj!:> SYSTEI S: S— ;tr"uk. ANNFU�I_ HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICA71ONS ENTER CODE ONLY ONCE 001- VIOLATION CODE 2 2 ^j ve'r 3 3 4 4 5, 5 6 6 7 7 �4 8 8 lst RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION EXTENSION FINAL RE -INSPECTION VIOLATIONS DATE DUE: DATE DUE: GRANTED TO: DATE DUE: CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 INSPECTOR: DATE: DATE: 3 DATE. MOLATIONS PRE -CITATION CITATION ISSUED VIOLATIONS 1 5 1 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER: 4 CODE 5 2, 6 2 6 DATE: SECTION: RETURN RECEIPT 6 7 3 7 RECEIVED .7 DISPOSITION: 4 18 4 18 DATE: 8 j � �TTEWNEEDED E] YES NIT LETTER NEEDED F] YES NO FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY N'. . VIturic . tr Fire Protection Contractors since 1930 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 3434 First Ave. So., Seattle, WA 98134, 206.622.4656 WA: WKI-NA.W73W LEVEL 111 602 Calffornia Way, Longview, WA 98632,3601.425.7620 Fire Sprinkler Inspection Report nFPn%rrTh- r/-. ""x 0, < A, JhR Un W - 5 Z"?J' 4117 nffvt:- STREET: -7406 WZ' 1*1^- /_ BLDMILOCATION: CITY/STATE: e�'x Z"/ HiSPECTOR: I Page�. 1 of 2 I.GENERAL .a. Is the building occupled ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - --- - - --- - - - - - - b. Is occupancy the same as previous inspection, ?. - - - --- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c; Are all systems In service ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - d.. Are all fire protection systems the same as last Inspection ? - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - --- - - - - - --- - - - - - - a. !a the building complatilysprinklerid ? - - - -- - - - - --- - -- - - - - - - --- - - - f. Are all new additions and building changes properly protected ? . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. g. Is all,stock or storage properly below sprinkler piping ? -- - - - - - --- - -- - - - - - - - --- - - - - h. Was property free of fireii since last Inspection? (Expfain any fire an Page. 2) - - - - - - - W - - - - - - - - 1. In area protected by wet systernk Is building properly hesteck Le-- blind aWca, perimeter areas and are all e3derlor openings protected g I the cold ? 2. CONTROL VALVES. (See Section* 17) a. Are all sprinkler system main control,valves open ? - - - - - - --- ---- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - b. Are all other control valves In proper position ? . . . . . . . . a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Are all control valves In good condition and sealed or supervised ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.WAfERSUPPWES; iSeeSection 18) a. Was a water flow test preformed and were the results satisfactory ? -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4. TANKS, PUMPS, & FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS a. Are fire pumps, gravity tanics, resevolre and pressure tanks In good pondition.and properly maintained ? - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - b.. Are Fire Department Connections In satisfactory condition. coijpllngs freo� caps In Olace and check valves tight Z s. WET SYSTEMS (See, Section 13) a. Are cold weather valves open or closed as necessary ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Have antifreeze systems been tested and left In satisfactory condition ? Tlemp.?_ - -- - - - - - - - - - - --- 6. Are alarm valves, Water flow Indicators and retard chambers In satisfactory condmon ? -- - - - - - - - 6. DRY� SYSTEMS (See Section 14) a. Are dry val.ve(p) In service and In good condition?.. . . ... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Are pressure and priming wate�leveli normal ? - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Is air compressor In good condition .? ... . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d. Were low points drained during fall and winter. ln�pectlons ? - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - .a. Are Quick- opening deviceii In s6mce ? - -- - - - - - - - 1. Has piping been checked for stoppagowlthl n.the past ton (IQ) years - - - - - - - - - - - - - - g. Has piping been checked for proper pitch within the past.five (5) years ? - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - h. Have dry valves been trip tesied sail . sfactorily as required ? - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 1. Are dry valves ad6quately protected from freezing ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Are valve house and heater conditions satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7.SPECtA,LsYs'itms (see qecI1on.1§) a. Were valves tested as required ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Were all host -responsive systems tested and were the results satisfactory T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c. Were supervisory fbatur.e.stest.ed and were the results satisfactory ? I - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - S.ALARIVIS 9. Is the water motor and gong testsallsfactory ? - - - - - - - . . . . . . . b. Is the electric alarm test satisfactory ? . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - c. [a the supervisory alarm service testsallsfactory ? ManitoringCo. PiL: 3?40-2'J*,91X code. 417 9. SPRINKLERS - PIPING a. Are all sprinkler heads In good condition, not obstructed and free-from.corrosion or Wading ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b. Are all sprinkler heads less than fifty (50) years old? Head Manufacturer:— Z"./,./ --Date of hand :A21-1) /3r/./ -_7 IT-11-7 Fire Protectioh Contractors sin.ce 1930 VIIGNG AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERCOMPANY 3434RnftAm So., Seeffl%WA,98134,206. 622.4656 WA:'VHGM-S373JVT LEVEL III .602CaWonifa*,Lmgvks�WA-qS�32,3L'ib.425.7= Fire Sprinkler Inspection Report Pagir. 2of 2 . 9 SPRINKLER I PIPING (Continued) . . . ..... YES NA NO j d-, -'c..Are extra sprinkler hbadwreadily ay�dlable ?. L,,—; Is". c"'a n, d, It o n- I pIe1!ig,:dr6IivaIves,'checkvaIv '.ban ger�,P"umgau 'a. An mparaturespil 7. fib Hre ditto g. Is hand hose on sprinkler systems satisfactory ? - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - -- - 10. Datb Dry System. Piping list checked for stoppage. . . . . 1A) 111. Date Dry System Piping [ad checked for proper pitch . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "AE7 12. Date Dry Pipe Valve list trip tested. . . . . . . 1A odel I Year. 13. Wet systems: Number, ----L--.,Uake I M -j&z — - - - - - - .14. Dry Systems: Number:— Makel Model /Year 19. Accelerator: Make /,Model /Year. 46..- Special Sydt6ma�.."tpl;W, -Typ Make/ Model/ Year: Condition 1-7. CONTROL VALVES a. City Connection Control Valves . . . . . . b. Tank Control Valves - - - - - - - - - c. Pump. Control Valves - - - - - - - - - d. Sectional Control Valvei. . . . . . . . -�,G. �ys am Control Valves - -- - - - 18. WATER FLOW TEST `;RPRIN qT6nkj3,FI_ Pu p �` re m :Water Flow'yopilli niisini, .70501119 L 66 To �Plpe ...,ressure Before t ow AT 7z 4Z 7Z 19. Explanation of 9ny "No-,pqswers(ZLJ I'Al", 1W "./A / 4v,.- -1 1VOW1 //J Ap-t.,,t 3 rl 4 20. Recent changes In building occupancy*or ilie protection equipment: 21. Adjustments or corrections made, besirable:.Irfigrid�a N. L A&I I' , Ao.—; 23. Has'building owner/ representative been notified . of an def r Iclency to the I I Ire protec I - Ion system? 13 �y Yqs 0 No, Person notified: It answer Is "No",explaln: 24. Inspector's Signature: Witness (property owner I lessee) and date: VIKING AUTOMATIC.SPRINKLER COMPANY pi�� Fire i-rotection 3434 FirstMenue South, 602 dalifomia Way Sufte #1 Since 1930 Seattle, WA 98134 Longview, WA 98632 (206) 622-4656. (360) 425-7620 FOREMAN'S REPQRT WEEK ENDJNG� 6- - 174"', VIKING 40B * t, , —,,) , �. t -I- " 4 // -.2 JSUndaYs DaW) EMPI.ovee Name* (print nnw - ano person par dm6 silp) Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri, Saf 'Sun Job Name: Job Address: 2 Building Area: Parking $ Ferry $ Travel Expense (Miles) # Subsi , stence (Days) 9 IMisceliaheous Expense �p $ ForemaWs'Sianature: IT)- 4" Customer Po#: Hours on Job - Travel Time: Provide a brief description of work orsOrvices 7, �Commenton status of the'j.ob (future work;to. be comple . led., parts needed, desirable improvements):. 7, Is job complete*?' Yes No. Was sprinkler system shut-off by others! Yes 'No Was sprinkler system restored by Vikin Val . ve,geal* Y6S No _g? Are -all shutoff 'valves open? Yes (>f) No (r4, Is system lobe restorp! by,others? If. yes, 0y.Whqm Yes (-!!P) No Is system connected to �central signat service? Yes No If yev, Monitor Co: Monitor Phone # and Code:. Viking Employee Report -of Safety (must be compleied) Work area inspected for safety prior to sfarfing worki Yes '[A No # of,Vikiri� Ernoloyee'�.QhJOV Nu'mber'o'f' V'ik*in g Employee's in attendance: Issues Found:, Suggestions Offered: AUTHORIZATION TOTERFORM WORK AND ACKNOWLEDGEM.ENT- OF SERVICE Sign6t&d of Owner; or ReoresehtatiVe' Date: ---------- Print Name, and Title:. rev 12-08 White - Vt)dng Copy Pink - Sal* (retum to office) Yefibw - Customer Copy Page 1. Page 2. Page 3 B 7 T 7!-H,, & MAIN ST. EDMONDS ELE-M-ENTARY To 6 p SCHO-OL 9 L SCALE I"=50' 50 IE V 10 STORAGE E AREA L BELOW G 22 21 20 �BK/WK� - C 7L L IRO lK OM� OFF T Irlifi3o, 115 GYM S L 19 18 B B R 'A N 0 R t 12 Y E3 -s'. 45 24 E7 4 CUST.. 5 B 17� 0 le /E\ L 23 R 4 TLJ 115, 15 14 12 11 1 "T _-S 12' 2 22' K STAIRS -E 13 s s L B B BB; -0�1 coo 13 y IS Aldoo r 0^0� rr f Sill-' #N S- 6~ ld6- 0 6rJr? tj -f /-v/C ZW V70 /24007.0of 6*-V, 1146a) W,4,k AaRor Z)ese4�-j OWD Apoes g;-apt3 OIC -W/6 01U. PAOO'Dg SAIPI-90 440*44^4 IOPO'40 rq'vr Doe-,.,01-0 TV er)-Ltyy,�u e). AND vilu. AF- atj 9000C #r- w 14-c- A)FVb 14.*U W 0 fpm I r /,v K r-o 4 _-N A -r �e _ _ _ 4,4a� - occmloo-i 7-r &o�ileewTaFP oN JOW /07 /,OC,4-77&,P-J ioleFlIPS&-b 3C 7- 77j5;T W t 4,4- 4IVb 0, A I N L E v E .B 7 oe 9 501 10 G 71-H��& MAIN ST. T 0 EDMONDS ELEMENTAF p SCHO,O L L s '. CAL"**E'111-50' E v 11000, E STORAGE AREA BELOW - E3 L Awl 24 0 CUST. w 1 �Xjl .0 23' E 0, R L 12 11 :151 S 22' STAIRS K 13 s B B B B IN 151 L11, v Al��io 49 je!5-e rr7!; rm�m P-4 IR 15 21 1 L 12 17 12 4 7 T 71-H - & MAIN ST. 0 EDMONDS ELEMENTAR) p SCHOOL L SCALIE'--, 1"---501 E v E STORAGE AREA LBELOW fill \ 1-/ ST IRS -f- of if:": G S 'BK IWK'- c 20 f L Room OFF T \njd Y 30- 151 H GYM L -Ls�J /"1 9 01 L "4-�3 8 1 N-7 R 2 A R Y "451 15, L 2 4 0 4 CUST. 117, 5 B A 0 L 23' E R 15' 14 12 11 S 2 22' s STAIRS F9 13 �,srs B B B B 4 R E C E I V E D D G T 19 81 EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. October 7, 1981 MEMO TO: Jim Jessel FROM: -Steve Simpson SUBJECT: ANDERSON CENTER STAGE CURTAINS We know the stage curtains have not been�-treated for at least seven years. Edmonds School District has nothing to show the curtains ;;ere firepr6ofed, though their maintenance people suspect they were. Gary McComas can flame test a,piece of the curtain, but he says that won't prove'too,much. I have the name of the firm the.School District used to fireproof their curtains. I suggest we ' meet with Gary McComas, Art Housler, and a representative from the insurance company to discuss what actions to take. SOS/mw cc: Gary -McComas CITY OF EDMONDS HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOP CIVIC CENTER * EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 a (206) 775-2525 FIRE DEPARTMENT January 26, 1981 Mr. Thomas Ryan Arai/Jackson Architects 1100-19th Avenue East Seattle, WA 98112 Dear Mr. Ryan: The proposed relocation of the automatic fire sprinkler pumper connection is acceptable to the Edmonds Fire Department. The new pipe which extends 22 feet from its present location must be installed with adequate pitch so that it will drain and not accumulate water. If you have any questions or if we can be of any assistance to you, please contact this office by calling 775-2525, Ext. 233, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, S " G %v ary McComas Fire Marshal G124: sr filh Arai/Jackson Architects & Designers January 21, 1981 Mr. Gary McComus Edmonds Fire Marshal 250 Fifth Avenue Edmonds, Washington 98020 R E C E I V E D JAN 2 6 1981 EDMONDS FIRE DEPT., Gary, jZe: MZA'NCM� A-NQF-� CAE-ATr--R T_MM6\/EMr=N1Z'> Here is the proposed relocation of the Automatic Fire Sprinkler pumper connection. Please send me confirmation if the reloca- tion is acceptable. Sincerely, 71P Thomas Ryan Enclosure 1100-19th Avenue East Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 323-8800 INN KNE aftimmalumills I r r =A W�-� V4 6 ...... - - - - - - - -34 IMIMI P. *-4rl ---ewLwo caL -vo-C-099A -(."lY"- - cl 6 t LL 4m, molm