The URL can be used to link to this page

701 CEDAR ST.PDFiiiiiiiiiiiiii 10601 701 CEDAR ST ADDRESS: -701 tiyipf TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 0 Lq 4�1)b I T) 0 1 o () BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS,,,/ DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver Xstudy Required E] Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): — PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE SHORT PLAT FILE: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: LID #: LOT: 14 L BLOCK: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: 1217-c)lo`� CAM'C" QAka5 2� LATEMP\DSTs\Fonns\Street File Checklist.doc calx 51 LA�4DAU MEMORANDUM ASSOCIATES MAL I GEOTECHNC& I NAMM KSOMES TO: City of Edmonds: I FROM: Michelle L. Ramos, P.E., L.G. DATE: March 23, 2006 P,E: 701 CEDAR STR EET, TEMPORARY RETAININGWALL gop--MMO� 44 6, INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memorandum is to address stability concerns for temporary shoring along the t 701 Cedar Street in Edmonds, Washington. Our current understanding of eastern side of the excavation a schedule, as indicated by JeffjSuridge, is that this temporary wall will be removed in about 1 week time from the date of this memorandum. It should be noted that at the time of this memorandum, the current wall has been in place about I 'week. Landau Associates was retatined by AKA Design (now JTS Property Solutions) to per form a limited geotechnical investigation to identify depth to adequate bearing for the foundation of the proposed addition and to provide during construction foundation subgrade verification. The results of that limited investigation and subgrade rec mmendations were presented in a report dated March 2, 2006. Generally, adequate soil bearing (2000 psf) was encountered at a depth of about 2 to 3.5 feet below the original grade of the site. Recently, when Landau Associates was asked to perform during construction inspection of the footing subgrade, We noted that the footing depths and subsequent cuts for construction of the footings were deeper than our original� assumptions, which were stated in our proposal and our March 2 report, Our stated assumptions include; d "no significant cuts would be required." As a result of the cuts required to construct the footings and the proximity of the neighboring house to the east, temporary horing was placed by the contractor (Quality Improvement Company). � d to provide recommendations for the temporary shoring prior to its Landau Associates was not aske installation. The initial temporary shoring is reported to have consisted of a row of stacked ecology blocks along the eastern edge of the excavation. Prior to Landau Associates commencing our first subgrade verification visit, the i blocks fell over. The failure mechanism is not known. After our initial subgrade verification visit by a staff engineer, a senior engineer with Landau Associates performed a field �visit to respond to a neighbor's concern regarding the stability of the i 130 2nd Avenue South * Edmonds, WA 98020 9 (425) 778-0907 9 fax (425) 778-6409 9 www.landauinc.com NQ excavation and the temporary shoring. The contractor was in the process of re -building the wall and reportedly removed some soft ground from under the failed wall and replaced it with crushed rock prior to re -building the temporary wall. Subsequent observation of the re -built wall indicates that the wall is composed of ecology blocks that have been stacked 3-blocks high. The ecology blocks are generally 2- feet wide, 2-feet deep and 6-fect long. The wall is generally in the shape of a long "L" with the long leg oriented in a north -south direction. The south end of the wall terminates at the existing house and the short leg of the wall is at the northern end. Currently the first (lowest) row of blocks has been used as sacrificial form -work for the footing such that only the top 4 to 6 inches of the block is exposed. Because of the previous instability of the slope behind the wall, we recommend the bottom -most row of blocks remain in place to reduce the potential impact of wall removal to the slope and it is our understanding that the bottom row of blocks will be left in place. The configuration of the soil on the back side of the wall varies from the north end to the south end. At the north end, the soil contacts the back side of the wall about 3 feet below the top of wall, is inclined at about 60 degrees measured from the horizontal with the top of the slope about 4 feet above the top of the wall. At the south end of the wall, the soil contacts the back side of the wall about I foot below the top of the wall and is inclined at about 45 degrees with the top of slope about 3 feet above the top of the wall. All dimensions, depths and estimates of slope behind the wall were reported to Landau Associates by Jeff Suridge and have not been surveyed to confirni accuracy. The static stability of the temporary shoring was analyzed for three wall configurations. The first two conditions are for the wall and slope configurations described above. The third configuration assumes soil to the top of the current wall with a 45 degree backslope. This corresponds to the possible geometry of the slope/wall at the south end of the wall if the soil behind the wall sloughs to the top of the wall. Although the engineering properties of the soils on the slope, behind the wall and under the wall are not known, it is our opinion that they will be remain stable for the next week, presuming they are protccted from the elements and from surface water run-off. Soil properties of the retained soil were estimated based on our observations of the soils under the black tarp currently covering the slope and our experience on sites with similar soil types. Based on our analyses, the current configuration of the wall is considered stable with a calculated factor of safety of about 1.5. As is typical with temporary shoring, the wall was not analyzed for seismic loading. If the soil behind the wall were to slough against the wall, we estimate the factor of safety would be reduced to about 1.3. 03/23/06 \\Ednidata\projects\925\001\WIP\R\Wailletter,doc 2 LANDAu AssocIATES NO It is important to note that these calculations are based on our understanding of the soil and wall conditions at the time of this report. If conditions change, Landau Associates should be retained to re- evaluate the stability of the wall. Even though the static analysis indicates factors of safety above 1.0, it should be noted that the slope and temporary shoring configuration do not meet the standard requirements of Part N of Chapter 296-155 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) for Excavation, Trenching and Shoring. Because the slope and the shoring configuration do not meet the requirements, Section 296-155-66109 of the WAC requires that "The registered Professional Engineer shall inspect the work site at the beginning of each shift, after any change in weather conditions and after any change in the circumstances of adjacent property, The Professional Engineer shall make a written report of each inspection, the report shall be kept on file at the work site, and the report shall be made available to the director or the authorized representative of the director upon request. 0 All recommendations of the registered Professional Engineer regarding the excavation and soil conditions shall be followed.,, Additional safety recommendations include: Maintaining the plastic sheeting over the slope to reduce the potential for soil sloughing. The sheeting should be placed such that surface water and rain water are both kept off of the slope. 0 Limiting the number of workers and time spent adjacent to the wall, If after reviewing this report, you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. 03123/06 k%Edn)data\projectsk925\001\WIP\R\WalI letter.doc 3 LANDAu AsSOCIATES Ultra Block Wall Design Note: added surchage to reflect 80 degree backslope acting on wall Note: reduced F.S. on passive due to concrete fooling in front ofwall South and of wall Project 701 Cedar Street 1.5 BLOCK HIGH WALL No Batter Location Edmonds, WA Non -Seismic 60 degree Backslope Will Geometry and Backslope Sol] Parameters Block Height Width Unit Wt Unit Weight (pef) Soil - Backfill ��il 30 (ft) (Pcf) Unit Weight (pcf) Soil - Retained N 4"A 30 M �2 Tl�.' =,� at I PL41 4-401 Friction Angle (dog) Soil - Backlitil F-7-1, 2-81 ll� D1 Friction Angle (dog) Soi� - 177-M-1 CRetacnat'd Friction Angle (deg) Sol _ on . We 11 Embedment (I It typical, Hemb) Coefficient of Friction - Foundation 35 Backslope angle (beta) (deg) i-. 0 1 Will Batter (alpha) (deg, clockwise from vertical) Seismic Design Acceleration Coefficient (g's) SURCHARGE (parallel to slope) (pso (10% chance of exceedence In 50 yrs) (acts over a depth H, resultant applied at H/2 from base) Front Slope Inclination Factor of Safety on Passive Resistance ownw, Slope In Front of Wall - 0 Ird (dog) (enter negative for downward sloping) Geometry Calculations Design Wall Height (H) 0 Wall Embedment (Hemb), I it typical (it) Inclincled Wall Height (Hw) 00 Exposed Vertical Wall Height (He) 50 Bottom Width of Wall (Bb) Top Width of Wall (Bt) Inclination of back of wall (clockwise from horizontal plane) (theta) (rad) Inclination of backslope (counterclockwise from horizontal plane) (beta) (red) 0100 01-:1 Wall Batter (alpha) (rad) Earth Pressure Calculations Static Seismic kh (free to move up to 10A (inches) Friction Angle (red) Soil - Backfill .49 Kee Friction Angle (red) Soil - Retained Delta Kee Friction Angle (ra(l) Soil - Concrete i I Fir (inertial force) (Ibs / it) (acts at 0.61-1) i Delta Pao ((bs/ft) (acls at 0.61-1) Active Earth Pressure Coefficient, Ka Delta Pao (Ibs/11) - Horizontal Passive Pressure Coefficient (Factored), Kp JF.ft��01 Back wall angle wl vertical 7 Chi - function of kh and kv III Passive Resistance (Ibs) Friction - Retained (red) Friclion - Soil / Wall (r2d) Static Load, P (lbsffl) Backslope angle (red) Horizonal Component, Ph a M-0 Vertical Component, Pv b M-0 Surchage Load. q (lbs/ft) - Total c M-0 Horizontal, On Vertical, Ov Resistance to Sliding Resistance to Overturning Friction Coefficient. F 0.35 Block W X. Wx' Wy Wall Weight 560.00 1 560.00 1.00 1.00 560.00 560.00 Soil Wedgel Wt (top wedge) 0.00 2 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Soil Wedge2 Wt (bottom wedge) 0.00 3 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Normal Force. N 671.48 'AASHTO soil I - 80% 0.00 2.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 Sliding Resistance. Fr 4285.89 AASHTO so!12-80% 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Driving Force. I'd 260.39 Totals 560.00 560.00 560.00 FACTOR OF SAFETY (FOS) 17.12 X. 1.00 Resisting Moment. Mr 47OZOO Sliding FOS � 1.5 Y. 1.00 Driving Moment, Md 22 ' 6 Sliding FOS (Seismic) > 1.1 a 1.00 b 0.67 FACTOR OF SAFETY (FOS) 3.48 a 2.00 bl - Pir 1.00 Overturning FOS �, 2.0 b2 - Pao 1.20 Overturning FOS (Seismic) > 1.5 f1 -Qh 1.00 Gross Bearina Pressure - Minimum and Maximum 1`2 - Ov 2,00 N 671.48 i Resultant Falls in Middle 1/3 If A < 8 Nv 671.48 A B i Nh 0.00 0.57 0.83 OK X 0.83 1.17 1.33 OK ax 0.17 qmIn 165.23 < qmax 506.23 111 0 Ultra Block Wall Design i Note: reduced F.S. on passive due to concrete footing in front of wall Northendollwall Project 701 Cedar Street 2.5 BLOCK WALL No Satter Location Edmonds, WA Non4olsimic 1:1 Backslope Wall Geometry and Backslope Soil Parameters Block Height Width UnItWt Unit Weight (pcf) Soil - Backflll ��',,41;1130 y7l,�: Unit Weight (pcf) Soil - Retained MNk1,0i,'.130 1IT 21 :21�T 2V1 V 21 '211 Friction Angle (deg) Soil - Backfill 21 �140 Fnction Angle (deg) Soil - Retained 21§ Friction Angle (deg) Soil - Concrete tr0!!05t24 �a Wall Embedment (1 ft typical, Hemb) 1:6 Coefficient of Friction - Foundation 1;-l'..'A 5 .3 Backslope angle (bets) (deg) 0444 01 Wall Batter (alpha) (deg, clockwise from vertical) 1"�:-A" b'K?:01 Seismic Design Acceleration Coefficient (g's) Vlmw�oe'lo SURCHARGE (parade] to slope) (psf) (10% chance of exceedenco in 50 yrs) (acts over a depth H.'resultant applied at H/2 from base) Front Slope Inclination Factor of Ssfehi� an Passive Resistance Slope In Front of Wall -Downward (deg) (enter negative for downward sloping) Geometry Calculations Design Wall Height (H) Wall Embedment (Hemb), I ft typical (ft) Inclinded Wall Height (Hw) Exposed Vertical Wall Height (He) Bottom Width of Wall (Bb) M -*TOO Top Width of Wall (Bt) Inclination of back of wall (clockwise from horizontal plane) (theta) (red) 7 Inclination of backslope (counterclockwise from horizontel'plane) (beta) (rad� 0 _�R l 0. � Wall Better (alpha) (rad) Earth Pressure Calculations Static I Seismic Friction Angle (rad) Sod - Backfill IMM.1001491 Friction Angle (red) Soil - Retained I 'M9 Friction Angle (red) Sod _ Concrete Ift-14-mwo'. 21 Active Earth Pressure Coefficient, KB i Passive Pressure Coefficient (Factored), Kp Passive Resistance Obs) Static Load, P Obs/ft) IT45 Horizonal C: ki. N Vertical Con P=n'�,Fh I Surchage Load, q (Ibs/fl) - Total M Horizontal, Qh K114-il Vertical, Ov Resistance to Sliding Friction Coefficient, F - 0.35 Wall Weight 1120.00 Soil Wedgol Wt (top wedge) 0.00 Soil Wedga2 Wt (bottom wedge) 0.00 Normal Force. N 1410.36 Sliding Resistance, Fr 4544.50 Driving Force, I'd 652.17 FACTOR OF SAFETY (FOS) 6.97 Sliding FOS > 1.5 Sliding FOS (Seismic) > 1.1 Gross Bearing Pressure - Minimum and Maximum Kh (tree to move up to 10A (inches) Koo Delta Koo Fir (inertial force) Pbs / it) (acts at 0.5H) Delta Poe (UWft) (acts at 0.6H) Delta Poe (lbs/ft) - Horizontal Back wall angle wrt vertical Chi - function of kh and kv Friction - Retained (red) Friction- Soil / Wall (red) Backslope angle (red) W a M-O b M-0 c M-0 I Resistance to Overturning Block W X. y Wx. Wy 1 560.00 1.00 3.00 560.00 '1680.00 2 560.00 1.00 1.00 560.00 660.00 3 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 :AASHTO sail I - 80% 0.00 2.00 2.67 0.00 0.00 �AASHTO sail 2 - 80% 0.00 2.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 N 1410.36 Resultant Falls in Middle 11 /3 If A < B Nv 1410.36 A B ! Nh 0.00 0.67 0.42 �NO X 0.42 1.58 1.33 NO ex 0.58 1 qmIn .512.98 qmax 1923.34 Totals 1120.00 1120.00 2240.00 X. 1.00 Resisting Moment, Mr M%170073 Y, 2.00 Driving Moment, Md IMIK10247, a 1.00 b 1.33 FACTOR OF SAFETY (FOS) 1.64 0 2.00 b1i - Pir 2.00 Overturning FOS > 2.0 b2 - Pao 2.40 Overturning FOS (Seismic) > 1.5 if - Qh 2.00 f2 - Ov 2.00 Ultra Block Wall Design Note: reduced F.S. on passive due to concrete footing In front of wall Assumed coil to top of wall Project 701 Cedar Street 3 BLOCK WALL No Satter Location Edmonds, WA Non -Seismic 45 degree Backslope Wall Geometry and Backslope Soil Parameters Block Height Width UnItWt Unit Weight (pcf) Soil - Backfill 30 54`b Unit Weight (pcf) Soil - Retained . �: � -� � mil, 13 0 1 1 � 2 1 -71 � 2 1 �;'l 11�jil 4 00 ;i JT Fnction Angle (deg) Soil - Backfill F-77 3 1 -0, 5 1 Friction Angle (deg) Sod - Retained F777V-,V728 Friction Angle (deg) Sol - Concrete ��rj',Th- 24 Wall Embedment (I it typical, Hemb) Coefficient of Friction - Foundation Backslope angle (beta) (deg) Wall Batter (alpha) (deg, clockwise from vertical) Seismic Design Acceleration Coefficient (g's) SURCHARGE (parallel to slope) (psf) (10% chance of exceedence in 50 yrs) (acts over a depth H, resultant applied at 1-1/2 from base) Front Slope Inclination Factor of Safety on Passive Resistance Slope In Front of Wall - Downward (deg) (enter negative for downward sloping) Geometry Calculations Design Wall Height (H) Wall Embedment (Hamb), I It typical (ft) Inclincled Wall Height (Hw) NINE Exposed Vertical Wall Height (He) Bottom Width of Wall (Bb) 2f Top Width of Wall (8t) Inclination of back of wall (clockwise from horizontal piane) phets) trao Inclination of backslope (counterclockwise from horizontal plane) (beta; (red) Wall Batter (alpha) (red) Earth Pressure Calculations Static Seismic i kh (free to move up to I OA (inches) Friction Angle (red) Soil - Backfill Kee Friction Angle (red) Soil - Retained Delta Kee Friction Angle (red) Soil - Concrete Pr (inertial force),(Ibs / ft) (acts at 0.51-1) Delta Pee (lbs/ft) (acts at 0.6H) Active Earth Pressure Coefficient, Ka Delta Pao (lbs/ft) - Horizontal Passive Pressure Coefficient (Factored), Kp Back wall angle wri vertical Chi - function of kh and kv R`14F-70:000 Passive Resistance (lbs) JW44501 Friction - Retained (red) Friction - Soil / Wall (red) 5111RANIN Static Load, P Otisfil) Backslope angle (red) Horizonal Componant, Ph a M-0 MOD 80 Vertical Component, Pv b M-0 1014 Surchage Load, q (lbs/ft) - Total c M-0 Horizontal, Ch Vertical, Ov Resistance to Sliding Friction Coefficient, F 0.35 Wall Weight 1260.00 Sol] Wedgel Wt (top wedge) 0.00 Soil Wedge2 Wt (bottom wedge) 0.00 Normal Force, N 1605.62 Sliding Resistance, Fr 4612.84 Driving Force, I'd 776.27 FACTOR OF SAFETY (FOS) 5.94 Sliding FOS > 1.5 Sliding FOS (Seismic) > 1.1 Resistance to Overturnin Block W - )e Wx' wy, 1 560.00 1.00 3.50 560.00 1960.00 2 560.00 1.00 1.50 560.00 840.00 3 1140.00 1.00 0.25 140.00 35.00 �AASHTO soil 1 - 80% 0.00 2.00 3.17 0.00 0.00 AASHTO so112-80% 0.00 2.00 1.17 0.00 0.00 Totals X. Y, b bl - Pir b2 - Pao fl -Qh Gross Bearing Pressure - Minimum ond Maximum f2 - Qv N 1605.62 Resultant Falls In Middle1/3 If A < B Nv 1e05.62 A B I Nh 0.00 0.87 0.31 �NO X 0.31 1.69 1.33 NO ex 0.69 qmln -867.54 qmax 2473.16 1260.00 11250.00 2835.00 1.00 Resisting Moment, Mr =00"I's 2.25 Driving Moment, Md . ' 1.00 1.60 FACTOR OF SAFETY (FOS) 1.34 2.00 2.25 Overturning FOS :,, 2.0 2.70 Overturning FOS (Seismic) > 1.6 2.25 2.00 D Date Received: . el en Citv of Edmonds Development Services Department 1215 th Avenue North Edmonds, W)k 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 For ClWse Only: File.No: 1 . 2. REQUEST FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTION If you have distinctive handwritinq,you may choose to type this form. Alleged Violator's Name/Phone: Violation Address or Site Location: 01,0� DETAILS OF REQUEST: (Please be specific.) ly X_ 6,00� _�7 olae-i ,4,"'eo' 7�av V Jr I 014 hel.,�. Y,4m,4, The City of Edmonds investigates possible violations on a request basis only. Therefore, the name of the person filing the re st city to investigate. Name (pie Phon (Area Code) Address: ree ddress) (City) (State) (zip) Pursuant to State Public Disclosure Law RCW 42.17.310(l)(e), the complainant may indicate a request for non -disclosure of their ' name and identity. If non -disclosure is desired, the bottom portion of this form which indicates your identity as a complainant, will be redacted (blacked out) prior to public disclosure. Please be advised, the majority of violations are resolved without the release of request information. — HOWEVER, IF THE CITY IS REQUIRED TO USE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS TO RESOLVE THIS REQUES17 AND/OR VIOLATION, THIS ENTIRE FORM AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION MAY BE DISCLOSED -- AS PUBLIC INFORMATION. If you do not want your identity disclosed, check the box and sign on the line p riovided. Thank you. Signature: Date 3-17-06 r A qr-, 4b. 4.� 40 040 -9 -Wo' MO. /dew r- L� Aft— w7REET FILE PLANNING DATA NAME: 6�rr,-A6, DATE: SITE ADDRESS: 70 1 6�,IAX PLAN CHK#: 05% 57-1- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1-krtf 1,,-j � A A,*,' - REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?:?�/ N�o 1/1, N, -- / MAP PAGE:---L3-- CORNER LOT: ( ges No) FLAG LOT: (nes �/o ZONING:_ 12- S CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #: (--)S - I WStudyRequired:. io'4� �J-'4UA 1, 194W V . V41A 00-, 7, UWaiver Ll Conditional Waiver SEPA DETERMINATION: LJ Fee Ll Checklist L3APO list w/ ota,i,ed form Ll (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) OrExempt SETBACKS: Reciuired Setbacks: -71,�Ava. Street: 20' Left Side: 2-'), Right Side: Rear: Actual Setbacks- 51 fG cd.�w Street: 14 Left Side: 2- 1' Right Side: Rear: 33 Street map checked for additional setback required? (Les / No / RNA) Ll DETACHED STRUCTURES: ""k b t-� La ROCKERIES: e.,�.j st-. ; fvj �% ti.1, - 4ij jt- t' JV 'W LJ FENCES/TRELLISES: �^(t tK-,, (.-, U BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION: LdSTAIRS/ DECKS: D�cvj &,( t6.�e,,, CA 6—,tA4!) v*�.,jL : b, LY PARKING: Required: 2- Actual: 3 LOT AREA: Go �5 '7S Z3-1 lz4o .,7'1")- LOT COVERAGE it 3 & �- 1( Calculations: oo-7 ub� 34 3 4-17. BUILDING HEIGHT: Datum Point: ci�nw trw w- jj- .-WV4-s-� t- �J Datum Elevation:— 1'7o' Maximum Allowed: I Actual Height: Z5' (it) �7 A.D.U. CREATED?: (!j70�1 YeS) 13 iSt,�� -Xl d, Y� 6-.,, n. i 11,4e V;#�� uA A. 3 j& .� t- =Ia. SUBDIVISION: Ie4i"o P"W " G"."i LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: (Yes / No) bt r4 reA-,,,A 6 -L,,,. ii "r 'I f-..; I �*- i�'V—i Plan Review By: ON b.*- P- 11 3o, tj ra i—fd- ;f Am. &4- of/- i'�il ��X ft-6"LjP'A -,h.' NewBPP1anningDataForm.D0C w, 1, S,6�6" "IW61' 4�� -.j 6r�t) AAA"A (-Ir W"11 W A*- 60 15e Ar - v� I b7. OK #P20 City. dmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained ori this form is to be filled out by any.person. preparing a Development Permit Appli . cation4or the City of Edmonds prior to his/her su*ttal Of the application to the Cit�. ii�e�urpose of the Checklist is to -enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed -to complete the, Checklist �.sbould be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). 46 / i (a fos Date Received: City Receipt #: 0 -7 L-1 Critical Areas File #: 7,0045 - 0 1.19 Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant:_&— I— 6C) A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must ill out the checklist� sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the chec klist,.make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the ,subsequen t. steps. necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinitymap, - along with the signed copy. of,this form to assist City:sta�ffin finding and locating the specific piece of property- described on this form. In addition, , the applicant. -shall include other pertinent information .(6.g. sit I e plan,� topography map, etc.) Or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff ,in completing their preliminary assessment -of the site. The undersign ed applicant ing of the application agrees, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, 'in consideration on the process to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City.of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages,". including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action -or in6action based in whole or part 'upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information fumished-.by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.' By. my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true-aind correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this a h ation on the behalf of the owner as listed below. I SIGNATURE oF APPLicANT/AGENT DATE . 1 1) . . %, Ll Property Own er s Aftthorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above App)lcant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my.permission for the bli ffi i and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the pu ic,o . cials. purposes of inspection =44wstipg atten&gi;�� application. SIGNATURE OF, Owner/AppHcanv, 7472FI&A- A 4a 611? Name. ,Street Address 0;� City, State', zip� DATE&—/, Applicant Representative: vyt Name Street Address City State ZiD Telephone:-��':;-- =-Zevr� Telephone: Email address (optional): Ema . il Address (optioftal� lVel #P20 CA File No: g I Critical Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/vegetation) 1.. Site Address/ Location: 6e4l_ 2. ..Property Tax Account Number: L,70�K&�E,001-061-eO 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet)-. L-5- 3 �4 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; no. If yes; how is site developed?. 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15 % (a vertical rise of 10-feet -over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopespresent on site.of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over. a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (pleasedescribe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing, water: Approx. Depth,. What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface?. Flows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? 10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed .Urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetIand is present on site: 1. 2. 3. 61 For City Staff Use Ordy Plan Check Number, if applicable? y1f, 81 1 VF-n Site is Zoned? SCS mapped soff type(s)? 0 1 dtVW6, Od U Vk�," 144-7d tZW 12 1 C- 9 9-15- Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? � C; Y V =, % VY I rr CAI,(A Y-0.1 ) DETERMINATION STUDY RFQUIRED Reviewed by, Aywil vy_vll� WAIVER 0S HAP I I-OD6 9 . . CITY OF EDMONDS . CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location: 701 Cedar Street Tax Acct. Number: 00484500100100 .Determination: Study Required Determination #: CA-2005-118 Applicant�: Jeff Surridge Owner: Patricia Bowman CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED (CA-2005-118) During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain or be adjacent to critical areas, including an Erosion Hazard Area and Stream pursuant to Chapter 23.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to comple ' te the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific development application, Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There ate additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study and an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. • Erosion Hazard areas include Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater. among others. • Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined in ECDC 23.80.020.A. • In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Erosion Hazard Areas (which are one of the Geologically Hazardous Areas) are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. Note that Stable Erosion Hazard Areas may have limited report requirements at the director's discretion. At a minimum an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements in ECDC Chapter 18.30 shall be required. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS, ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within an Erosion Hazard Area I Projects that will intrude -into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. 0 Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. REPORT REQUIREM ENTA REAMS A Creek or it's tributary is on or near the subject property. • Streams are areas where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed which demonstrates clear evidence of the passage of water. Streams need not contain water year-round. • Streams are regulated as types of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. • Streams are classified according to whether or not they run year round and whether or not they support fish populations according to the classification system listed in ECDC 23.90.01 O.A. 1. , • The minimum buffer widths for streams vary depending on the type of stream and are listed in ECDC 23.90.040.D.l. In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Areas report requirements for Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas are provided in ECDC 23.90.020.A to C and additional technical information requirements for streams are listed in ECDC 23.90.020.D. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ON A SITE WITH A STREAM Development proposals that encroach into streams or their buffers or building setbacks may be allowed through the approval of certain processes. The width of a stream buffer may be reduced through buffer enhancement if through the review of a Stream Buffer Enhancement Plan that meets the specific requirements referenced in ECDC 23.90.040.D.2. The maximum amount that a buffer can be reduced through buffer enhancement is 50%. A buffer may also be modified through a process called buffer averaging. The criteria applied to buffer averaging are listed in 23.90.040.D.2. The maximum amount that the buffer width can be reduced at any single location through buffer averaging is 50%. Development proposals that propose encroachments into buffers beyond what is a ' I ' lowed through the above methods require a Critical Areas Variance or a Reasonable Use Exception. If you think that you have a proposal that may require one of these process I es, please contact a Planner for more information. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information. EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. Gina Coccia. Planner 0��M I &M" August 31, 2005 Name, Title U Signature Date NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds.website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. 2 APPLICATION for The City of Edmonds SEDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT No . .......................................... NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS 106-00100 OWNER........ lella...Taylar.� ....................................... ............................ CONTRACTOR .................................................................................................. PERMIT No . ...................... ADDRESS ..... 701 --- Cedar .. Street ........................................................... io LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . .............................................. BLOCK No . ............................................ NAMEOF ADDITION ....... ................................................................................................................................. Zip DYE TESTED ON SEWER JULY, 1972 Approved: DATE.......... ..................................... By ..................................... ................................ 0 W Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM January 4, 2007 Street Files for 701 and 711 Cedar Street Jen Machuga, Planner Court order to move property line between 701 and 711 Cedar Street During inspection of an addition on the property addressed 701 Cedar Street (approved under BLD-2006-0043), it was found that the addition did not meet the minimum required 5-foot side setback from the eastern property line. The property owners at 701 and 711 Cedar Street brought the property line dispute to court, and a court order was issued moving the southern 79.09 feet of the property line separating these two properties to the east by 1.40 feet. The addition at 701 Cedar Street (under BLD-2006-0043) now meets the minimum required 5-foot side setback from the eastern property line; however, the original house continues to be nonconforming because it still does not meet the 5-foot side setback from the eastern property line. See the attached documents for reference. City of Edmonds V CEIVED JAN 0 4 2037 RETURN NAME &ADDRESS ., 10"'15065s, Please print neatly or type information Document Title(s) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS 20061229OJ38 8 PGS 12/291200 2:19r , N9.00 SNOHOMISH COUNT ARINGTON stipulation and Order, Judgment in Rem, and Decree Quieting Title Reference Number(s) of related documents: Additional Reference Vs on page_ Grantor(s) (Last First, and Middle Initial) Knowlson, James S. Knowlson, Mary F. Grantee(s) (Last �First, and Middle Initial) The Snohomish County Cedar Family Trust 1� Additional Grantors on page Additional Grantees on page Legal Description (abbreviated form- I.e. lot block, plat or section, township, range, quarteriquarter) Portion of Lot (s), 3 and 4, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page (s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Complete legal on page_ Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 004B45-001-003-00 (portion thereof) Additional parcel ft on page_ The Auditor/Recorder wlII rely on the Information provided on this form. The responsibility for the accuracy of the indexing information is that of the document preparer. *1 am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an additional fee as provided In' -RCW-36;18-.010;-[ understand that the -recording -processing -requirements -may cover-up or. otherwise obscure some part of the text of the original documenL Signature of Requesting Party C E P1 3 CL1 1 �9238 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE SUPERIOR COURY OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR SNOHOMISH COUNTY THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY CEDAR FAMILY TRUST, by and through its Trustee, T. SURRIDGE, . I Plaintiff, vs. JAMES S. KNOWLSON and MARY F. KNOWLSON, Defendants. NO. 06-2-11432-7 STIPULATION AND ORDER, JUDGMENT IN REM, AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE [CLERK's ACTION REQUIRED] JUDGMENT SUMMARY Grantee: The Snohomish County Cedar Family Trust Grantors: James S. Knowlson and Mary F. Knowlson Judgme nt Amount: N/A; Judgment in rem Abbreviated Legal Description: Portion of Lot(s) 3 and 4, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in. Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington.. Tax Parcel No.: 004845-001-003-00 (portion thereof) Attorney for Grantees: 'Kevin B. Hansen, WSBA #28349 121 Third Avenue P.O. Box 908 Kirkland, WA 98083-0908 425-822-9281 STIPULATION AND ORDER, JUDGMENT IN REM, AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE - I LIVENGOOD, FITZGERALD & ALSKOG 121 T141RD AVENUE P.O. BOX 908 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98083-0908 PHONE: (425) 822-9281 FAX (425) 828-M8 0 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION Plaintiff The �Snohomish County Cedar Family Trust and defendants James S. Knowlson and Mary F. Knowlson, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby agree and stipulate to the entry of the subjoined order, judgment in rem', and decree. Plaintiff i further agrees to release and waive any a dditional claims or rights, whether known or unknown, against defendants' real property, including but not limited to adverse possession and prescriptive rights. Likewise, defendants agree to release and waive any claims or rights, whether known or unknown, against plaintiff's real property, including but not limited to adverse possession and prescriptive rights. DATED: DecemberT7,2006 _Qm . ansen, ��9 of LIVENGOOD, FITZGERALD & ALSKOG, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs DATED: I)Qcember.�T, 1006 Mic1fdFil D. Wurdeman, WSDA79-453 Attorney for Defendants - ORDER, JUDGMENT IN RM AND DECREE THIS MATTER, having come before the undersigned on the foregoing stipulation, and the Court being fully advised on this matter; now, therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: I All right, title, and interest in and to the following real property, legally I described as: The West 1.40 feet of the South 79.09 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to. the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. is quieted in. favor of plaintiff The Snohomish County Cedar Family Trust. This real property is decreed to be joined to and deemed a part of the plaintiff's adjoining property. STIPULATION AND ORDER, JUDGMENT IN REM, AND DECREE. QUIETING TITLE - 2 LIVENGOOD, FITZGERALD & ALSKOG 121 THIRD AVENUE P.O. BOX 908 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98083-M8 PHONE: (425) 822-9281 PAX (425) 828-0908 40 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Defendants are hereby ordered, to execute a quit claim deed transferring ownership of the real property described above to plaintiff. 3. The resulting legal description for plaintiff's real property shall be: Lot(s) I and Z, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Together with the West 1.40 feet of the South 79.09 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. , Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account No. 004845-001-001-00 4. The resulting legal description for defendants' real property shall be: Lot(s) 3 and 4, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS j according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Except the West 1.40 feet of the.S outh 79.09 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account No. 004845-001-003-00. 5. Snohomish County is hereby ordered to correct all property records relating to the plaintiff's real property and the defendants' real property so as to comply with this Order, Judgment in rem, and Decree. A reduced survey map of the subject real properties is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 6. It is further ordered that plaintiff releases and waives any additional claims or rights, whether known or unknown, against defendants' real property, including but not limited to adverse pos session and prescriptive rights. It is further ordered that defendants release and waive any.claim s or rights, whether known or unknown, against plaintiff's real property, including but not limited to adverse, possession and prescriptive rights. STIPULATION AND ORDER, JUDGMENT IN REM, AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE - 3 LIVENGOOD, FITZGERALD & ALSKOG 121 THIRD AVENUE P.O. BOX 908 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98083-0908 PHONE: (425) 822-9281 FAX (425) 828-0908 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. This Stipulation and Order, Judgment in rem, and Decree resolves all claims asserted by plaintiff in its Complaint. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed with prejudice and without. costs. DATED this day of January, 2007.. I..ud offiMi� pioner Presented by: Kevin B. Hansen, WSBA #28349 of LIVENGOOD, FITZGERALD . I & ALSKOG, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Notice of Presentation Waived; Approved as �o Fori and for Entry: Richard D. Wurdeman, WSBA #9455-- Attorney for Defendants STIPULATION AND ORDER, JUDGMENT IN REM, AND DECREE QUIETIN G TITLE - 4 LIVENGOOD, FITZGERALD & ALSKOG 121 THIRD AVENUE P.O. BOX 908 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98083-0908 PHONE: (425) 822-9281 FAX (425) 828-0908 x hibl" t I 27 2V, R. 3 E, ffr ff. AW. //,vl, SZOT-70W 25, TF-P =0 PLAT XT FND. SSUH WM offi. D fi. WX MIF PLA:m A PUNCH MARK CH WiST RIM OF %I 4�1 REMOS OF SNOHOUlSli COUNTY. MAX HQUE i WALNUT STREET PER P45 fJO040723SMI SITUATE 04 THE COLINTY OF SNOHDWSH� SWE or WASHINWON. -Tom FRO. 4' URFAMq THE ENCHOLOSH COWM CEDAR FAWLY TRUST GRAPMC SCAU c np rm -ASSUMED MBX 50' 14N BETWEV WOULNEWTS I t..b ON CEDAR STREET AS SHOWN ON MAP WAC 332-ISCF-090 PROCEDURES USED IN IM SURVEY WERE FIELD IRAVOM UMM OR OWDING BTAWARDS SET By WAD 332-130-M(L owBIL28, h. WAG 3U-130-100 SUNWtOWS NO �4 MMUMENTAIRON FDR 1105 SUM WAS A THE SOMA Sff WOR 5 SECOND TOUL rrA7tON. Us SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED AMES SLv TACK LOT 3 E)MUMVE USE OF PAFTRES "OSE APPEAR HEREON ONLY, AND DOES NOT EXTEND 70 MONUMENTS LAST. Vm= vt/a/= 5 .l.EP 1) FOR .7 kuas R S= NEW Lai LjNr- 5 1.4' ANY UNNAUED 7MR13 PARrIES WMnftoWut I SURVINOX Lar I OW OLD LOT UK RECERTWICAIM BY IKE' LAW 4.15 A' AND p BOUNDARY UUM SHM AN CORNERS SLIT 3. 0. FOLM RMAR NO CAP AS NOIED %39 5acr REPRESENT DEW LOCATOG - DVINERSHIP UNES c LOT 4 cr MAY VARY. NO CUARANIZE OF OWNERSHIP 15 SET REM & CAP LSWOO ZOE.cr NEW 50 CONC. HAL & TAG L5220116 PROP m- CONCRETE MCHUMENT FOUND HE. Kea. COR Ac SrJL WEST OF NEW PROPE117V ALL WMATION USED Of CALCULATIND IHIS Lm By 1.21, SURVEY a NOT HICOSSARLY SHOWN, WE ANGLE PONT 15 L21'10 NEW PROPERTY URE ncWOOD FHQ QF= 2Jr To NEW PROPEFtly Lm TTER OFFSET Q,?Jr To KEW PROPERTY UNE OLD PROF. MMW MW FRCU tOM 10 in tm INO LINE WOOD FW- OFFSET L37 21.7— 10 NEW PROPERTY UNE FWD. REBAR NO CAP SE. KDO. Caft; L 0.12 BY VL 9,04 al-v M\NEW LOT LINE IS Lf "mo-wPm MOT Log SET LEAD & TACK FND. 4X4 CONM MON At TAC 2zm YAIH r BRIM DISK CEDAR STREET IN 819 RUCK vAlm 19, PUNCH RLWH14V FNL 04 CONC. MDR V61H r ORASS DISK y4l" le PUNCH i MUS 4A! REVISED 12/111)MV SURVEYOR'S CERMCILIE RECORD OF SlIEVEY DUN AWAV�.. SURVEYING, IN RECORDER'S CER11FICATE . . ..... 23201 -9,3rd.AVENUE SOUTHEPST:� dcy of 20._ gt jhh ffW ewntly MnuMs a wrwy mdt by Jpo.R BoTrjF.L,- WA 98021 —1530 tBad for racwd ft (425) 4aS m. w ud. my dk-U- W C=%� 01th " -- 1 ---m h bk of at Me 41 the roqwbmmts at Um wjrwy.�db ati sk Up JM I .ff Ink*. A7 OYSLH _d4. OUNAWAY SLJRWMG mvni at Twd awddom in Nowmb,* %%UM 12/19/2024 Or. CEDWR FWAILY MIST CHO. By scal A. 1 OF I 22650 JOB HErr STATE OF COUNITY OF S 1, P A M I-, DJ� i !I C I, S, 'Cif)f C-f iFIV &1101'f� cupy cf dl�� rig- inal now on file m rry o', fic e In witne!ss whe.eof, I hereunto set i—.,y hand and the S. eal of sltclf t 9 ff M PA Clark Deputy 0 WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Kevin B. Hansen Livengood, Fitzgerald and Alskog, PLLC 121 Third Avenue P.O. Box 908 Kirkland, WA 98083-0908 QUIT CLABI DEED RECEIVEE) JAN 0 4 2ov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Grantors:- JAMES S. KNOWLSON AND MARY F. KNOWLSON, husband and wife Grantee: THE:SNOHOMISH COUNTY CEDAR FAMILY TRUST Legal Description: Portion of Lot(s) 3, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Tax Parcel ID No.: 004845-001-003-00 (portion thereof) The Grantors, James S. Knowlson and Mary F. Knowlson, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in order to clear title, convey and quit claim to The Snohomish County Cedar Family Trust the following -described real estate, situated in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington,, together with all after -acquired title of the Grantors therein: The West 1.40 feet of the South 79.09 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. - I - DATED: December'Lib, 2006. James S. Knowlson , �V Mary/T. kin6xyNon k". STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COtJNTY OF SNOHOMISH On this day personally appeared before me James S. Knowlson and Mary F. Knowlson, husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary acts and deeds, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this � � . day of December, 2006. ".o -�ARY V\ 0, P U, a 4Q tAktb " 0 - V, -2- , A a Tro t,( (PrintName) NOTARY PU8LIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at F',-/ � 1,1 1"i� My commission expires:_ 0 , 7&-)/ 6e6�91,f ff iDiEN RUHY -AAUUACE P. I - . L - C . ATTORNEYS AT LAW September 8, 2006 Kevin B. Hansen LIVENGOODFLITZGERA.LD & ALSKOG 121 Third Avenue P. 0. Box 908 Kirkland WA 98083-0908 Re: Boundary Line Dispute Dear Mr. Hansen: STREET FILE W Scott Snyder 2106.447.2260 ssnyder@omwlaw.com RECEIVED SEP 1 1 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES We spoke the other day regarding a boundary line dispute between two neighbors in Edmonds. You have proposed using the provisions of RCW 58.04.007 to resolve the dispute. Our conversations have regarded the City's role in such a process. As you are aware, RCW 58.17.040 (6) exempts from the platting statute boundary line adjustments which do not create an additional lot and which contains sufficient area and dimension to meet minimum requirements for width and area of a building site. These provisions are mirrored in ECDC 20.75.050 (C)(2) and (3) which prohibit approval of a lot line adjustment which would produce setbacks below the minimum required or reduce lot width or lot size below the minimum required for the applicable zone. Therefore, any adjustment made by your clients would be required to be approved by the City through a boundary line adjustment process. Failure to do so would create illegal.lots -- that is, the structures and lots would not be entitled to nonconforming use fights because they were not pen-nitted by an action of the:City. The difficulty, of course, is that the City cannot approve the agreement between your parties because of the limitations of its ordinance and of state statute. Please note a recent decision of the Court of Appeals, Division I in Mason v. King County. Decision # 56341-6-1, 206 WL 2467912 (Wash. App. Div. 1). This decision published August 28, 2006 is on all fours with our situation. King County attempted to avoid the statute by arguing that the application should be concerned only with a "minimum lot area for construction." The Court, however, held that a boundary line adjustment must meet the minimum size and width requirements. Because one of the newly created lots would not meet the minimum width requirement,it could not be approved. As I have indicated, if the parties take a stipulation disposition to Superior Court and the Court determines where the boundary line is based on adverse possession, the City is required to accept Established 1902 A Member of the International Lawyers Network with independent member low firms worldwide 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100 - Seaftle,.WA 98101-1686 - 206.4477000 - Fay- 206 4470215 - Web: www.omwlaw.com (WSS641102.DOC; 1/00006.900000/) Kevin B. Hansen September 8, 2006 Page 2 the court order. Unfortunately, you cannot utilize the City's processes to obtain that same approval. To do so would jeopardize the legal nonconforming status of existing structures to the extent that they exist. Very truly yours, OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE, P.L.L.C. SVcottvyder WSS:gjz cc: James Knowlson Steve Bullock Duane Bowman (WSS641102.DOC; 1/00006.900000/) 0 a, December 5, 2005 Brandon Hamilton 70 t Cedar Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: CRITICAL AREAS SITE RECONNAISSANCE 701 CEDAR STREET EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Hamilton: 1ALAND AV ASSOOKFES RESUB DEC 20,2005 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS SIV�11; Oj� Landau Associates completed a critical areas site reconnaissance for the property located at 701 Cedar Street (subject property) in the City of Edmonds, Washington (City). A residence on the property and an associated driveway Itie approximately 10 to 40 ft, respectively, from an unnamed stream. This stream originates from a spring that is located to the east on a neighboring property. This letter report summarizes our findings of the site reconnaissance and provides technical information required by the Edmonds.Community Development Code (ECDC) for critical areas, adopted February. 2005. Before the site reconnaissance, Landau Associates biologists reviewed information from readily available public domain resourc6s. This information was used to gain a general understanding of potential critical areas 'issues on and near the project site. These resources included the Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon. Utilization, Puget Sound (Williams et al. 1975), the Digital Coastal Atlas [Washington State DepartrPent of Ecology (Ecology) 2005], City of Edmonds' critical areas inventory maps (City of Edmonds 2005), and appropriate ECDC sections pertaining to streams and critical areas (ECDC 2005). After completing the data-gatherting task, a biologist from Landau Associates conducted a site reconnaissance on September 23, 2005, to document the existing site conditions. REsum OF INFORMATION REVIEW AND SITE RECONNAISSANCE The Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Puget Sound does not mention this unnamed spring or stream. Ecology 's Digital Coastal Atlas also does not show the spring, stream, or any other environmental concerns on or around the subject property. The City of Edmonds' critical areas inventory maps indicate that the subject property is within an erosion hazard area. The site recotmaissance included visual observations of adjacent properties and interviews with adjacent property owners. From this effort, it was determined an unnamed spring surfaces cast of the ENVIRONMENTAL I GEOTECHNICAL I NATURAL RESOURCES 130 2nd Avenue South - Edmonds, WA 98020 - (425) 778007 - fax (425) 778-6409 - wwwJandatinc.com , . SEATTLE - SPOKANE - TACOMA - PORTLAND subject property along the north side of 711 Cedar Street. The property owner at 711 Cedar Street has created a pond (without a recirculating pump system) to control the flow of the,spring before it leaves his property to the west and enters the subject property at 701 Cedar Street. Once on the subject property, the small stream flows toward the west approximately 40 ft through a defined channel. At the west side of the property boundary, the stream enters a below-gro und culvert and finally into a series of catch basins. Both ornamental and invasive plant species are present near the streambank, including common horsetail (Equisetum arvense), rhododendron (Rhododendron sp.), evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus), bracken fem (Pterid um aquilinum), swordfern (Polystichum munitum), 'morning glory (Convolvulus arvensis). Several other grass and tree species were observed in the northeastern portion of the subject property, where the.strearn enters the site. Mowed grass is present on the remaining streambank on the property. Within the stream channel itself, vegetation is limited to common horsetail,' common velvetgrass (Holcus lanatus), watercress (Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum), and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). EDMONDS COMMUNITv DEVELOPMENT CODE Section 23.90.0 10 of the ECDC, adopted February 2005, defines four types of streams in Edmonds, as follows: "Streams shall be classified in accordance with the Washington Department Of Alatural Resources water typing system (WAC 222-16-030) hereby adopted in its entireti, by reference and summarized as follows. - a. Type S: streams inventoried as 'shorelines of the state' under Chapter 90.58 RCWand the rules promulgated pursuant to Chapter 90-58 RCW,- b. Type F.- streams which containfish habitat,- c. Type Np: perennial nonfish habitat streams,- and d Type Ns: seasonal nonfish habitat streams. All streams included on the inventory that are known to exist within the City of Edmonds do not meet criteria for 'shorelines of the state' but contain fish habitat and, thus, meet designation, criterid for Type F waters pursuant to WAC 222-16-030. However, not all Edmonds streams support anadromous fish populations or have the potential for anadromous fish occurrence because of obstructions, blockages or access restrictions resultingfto�m existing conditions. Therefore, in order to provide special consideration of and increased protection for anadromous fish in the application of development standards, Edinonds streams shall befurther classified asfollows: A nadromous fishbearing streams: streams existing in whole or in part within the' City of Edmonds in which anadromous fish are known to occur. As of 2004, Edmonds fishbeari,ng streams are known to include Villow Creek, Shellabarger Creek, Shell Creek-, Hindley Creek, Perrinville Creek, and Lunds Creek and Nonanadromousfishbearing streams. streams existing in whole or in part within the City of Edmonds which do not suppoi-tfish populations and do not have the potential forfish occurrence because of barriers tofish passage or lack ofsuitable habitat. 12105/05 S:Projects\925k001\FileRmkR\70l Cedar Critical Areas Recon—itrrpt LANDAu AsSOCIATES 1 2 Streams with anadromousfish occurrence were identified in the Edmonds Stream Inventory and Assessment, a 2002 report of Pentec Environmental which is incorporated by this reference as ifterein setforth. " Section 23.90.040 of the ECDC describes standard stream buffer widths as follows: "The following shall be the standard buffer widths for streams based upon the Washington State Department of Natural Resources water typing system and further classification based upon fish presence (fishbearing vs. nonfishbearing) for the Type F streams existing in the City of Edmonds: a. Type S.- 150feet; b. Type F anadromous fishbearing stream adjacent to reaches with anadromous fish access: 100feet; c. Type F anadromous fishbearing. stream adjacent to reaches without anadromousfish access.- 75feet; d. Type F nonanadromousfishbearing stream: 75feetl- e. Type Ap: 50feet; f Type Ns.- 25feet. " Based on the information collected during our background review and site reconnaissance, we have concluded that the unnamed spring and stream would be classified Type Np — perennial nonfish habitat stream. Although the surface water produces a defined channel, which demonstrates evidence of water passage, the portion of the strearn that originates from the spring at 711 Cedar Street and flows west through the subject property, where it enters a series of catch basins, does not contain any resident trout or anadromous salmon because of the presence of impassable- fish barriers. Based on this stream rating, a 50-ft buffer from the ordinary high water mark of this stream would be required on the subject property. STREAM MITIGATION The ECDC allows for a reduction of the buffer of up to 50 percent, provided that a stream buffer enhancement conclusively demonstrates that enhancement of the stream buffer will not degrade the value of the buffer area in terms of fish, stream, and wildlife protection. Stream buffer enhancement plansraust meet the specific requirements of ECDC 23.40.110, 23.40.120, 23.40.130, and 23.90.040 D 2a-d. The ECDC also allows for stream buffer averaging, pursuant to ECDC 23.90.040 D I A list of native shrub species is provided in Table I so that future homeowners can plant the buffer with appropriate species. According to the ECDC, shrubs should be planted at a density of no less than 3 ft on center, trees should be planted at no less than 8ft on center. Planting additional shrub and tree species will increase the habitat functions of the buffer. All of the listed species below occur frequently in wetland buffers throughout the area. These species have been chosen not only for their ability to ,12105105 S:ProJects1925100lkFileRmXRX701 Cedar Critical Areas Recori_1trrpt LANDAu AssocIATES 3 0 tolerate the site conditions, but also for their ability to provide wildlife forage, habitat, and aesthetic appeal. TABLE 1 BUFFER PLANT SPECIES Scientific Name Common Name Notes Mahonia nervosa Oregon grape Likes dry sites, such as the upper portion of the buffer Comus stolonifera red -osier dogwood Probably suitable for lower buffer area only Gaultheria shallon salal Holodiscus discolor oceanspray Likes dry open sites Lonicera involucrate Black twinberry Prefers moist soils Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum Also could be located in lower area with S. racemosa Philadelphus lewisii mock -orange Tolerates dry soils; flowering shrub, very fragrant Ribes sanguineurn red -flowering currant Likes dry soils, forest edge; pink flowers in spring Rubus parviflorus thimbleberry Open forests, drier soils Rubus spectabilis salmonberry Prefers moist soils Rharnnus purchiana cascara Does well in the shade; does well in fairly dry areas Salix scouleriana Scouter willow Upland and wetland; a better choice than S. sitchensis Safix sitchensis Sitka willow Common and tolerant, however can invade streambanks Sarnbucus racemosa red elderberry Rapid grower; will tolerate sun and shade Sorbus scopulina Western mountain ash The proposed trees and shrubs would provide greater species variety over existing conditions in this area, replacing the grass ground cover. Shrubs and trees should be planted in the early spring or late fall and the new plantings are -to be watered regularly during the first three growing seasons after installation. To help establish the planted trees through the summer months (June -September), a temporary irrigation system will need to be installed. The irrigation system needs only to be a drip line, above -ground system. Periodic visual inspection of the trees following planting will help determine if the flow of the drip system is providing enough water. Wilted or burned -looking leaves and needles are an obvious sign that the flow needs to be increased The planted buffer area will need to be maintained for a minimum of three years. Any plant specimen that fails to thrive in the buffer area and dies must be replaced with the same species or an approved species of tree or shrub-. As long as the specified plants are used, shrubs are planted in the early spring or late fall, any blackberry or other invasive plant species is cut back at least twice a year for a minimum of three years, and the new plantings are watered regularly during the first three growing seasons after installation, shrub and tree plantings within the buffer are expected to be successful. GEOLOGWALLY HAZARDOus, AREAS Geologically hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, landslides, earthquakes, or other geological events. The house on the subject property is situated approximately 10 ft below the grade of Cedar Street. The slope from Cedar Street at the south end of the property creates a steep slope 12105/05 S:Praiec:tsV925\001 kFileRmXR1701 Cedar Critical Areas RecorLMVt LANDAu AssocIATES 4 along the northern, eastern, and southern portion of the site. These slopes have been established by a system of retaining walls, leaving minimal soils exposed. The small area of available soil has become established with a combination of ornamental and invasive species, such as English ivy (Hedera helix), evergreen blackberry, bracken fern, swordfern, rhododendron species, azalea (Rhododendron sp), and rose (Rosa sp.). During the planning and construction process, alteration of the retaining wall and vegetation should be avoided. If vegetation is grubbed and removed, it should be replanted to avoid erosion. Also, if the retaining wall is to be altered, a detailed special study report would be required, per ECDC 23.80.050. According to the ECDC 23.80.050 G, report requirements for stable erosion hazard areas and additional procedures to limit ero sion and excess sedimentation are as follows: "At the director's discretion, detailed critical areas report requirements may be waived for erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability. Report requirements for stable erosion hazard areas may be met through construction documents that shall include at a minimum an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with requirements setforth in, Chapter 18.30 ECDC - USE OF Tms REPORT This report was prepared for the exclusive use of AKA Design for specific application to this project. The use by others, or for purposes other than intended, is at the user's sole risk. The findings presented herein are, based on our understanding of the 701 Cedar Street site, the City of Edmonds critical areas regulations, and site condit : ions observed during the September 23, 2005, site reconnaissance. This study included investigation of the potential critical areas, as requested in the City Municipal Code, passed May 17, 2005. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, the findings presented in this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted sensitive area investigat ion principles and practices in this locality at the time this letter report was prepared. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. Stream ratings and buffer widths recommended by Landau Associates are considered preliminary until verified by City personnel. 12105/05 SProjects%925=1 WileRmXM701 Cedar Crftical Areas Recon-Itupt LANDAu AssocIATES 5 1 11^ A"N Landau Associates appreciates the opportunity.to assist you with this, pr(i ect. If you decide to develop the property, we call prepare the required buffer enhancement plan and assist you with other aspects of the proiect as well. If any questions arise re(,arding this lettOr report. please call us at 425-778- 0907� LANDAU ASSOCIATES. INC. Shannon Moore Project Environmental Scientist -4, hason Detarnore Staff Scientist SEINVJWD�Idr 12A)b�05 S'Propcis C-Ada, Gnitcal Areas Re-nonjtrrpt LANDAU ASSOCIATES AIN REFERENCES ECDC. 2005. City of Edmonds, Washington Municipal Code. Available at http://search.mrse.or nxt/,gatewLay.dlVedmdmc?f--templates&fn=edmdpage. htm$vid=municodes: Edmonds. Edmonds Community Development Code. Accessed on September 23. Ecology. 2005. Department of Ecology Washington Coastal Atlas. Available at http://www. ecy.wa.gov./programs/sea/sma/atlas home.html. Washington State Department of Ecology. Accessed on September 23. Edmonds, City of 2005. Edmonds Community Plan Update. Available at http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us/ CitvDepartmt�nts/PlanningDept/cpupdate drafts.htm. City of Edmonds. Accessed on September 23. Williams, R.W., R.M. Laramie, and J.J. Ames. 1975. A Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization — Volume 1: Puget Sound Region. Washington Department of Fisheries. November. 12/05105 S:Projects\925X00IkFileRm%RN701 Cedar Critical Areas Recon—thTt LANDAu AsSOCIATES CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5th AVE. N. - EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 * (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES December 23, 1985 Ms. Leila -Taylor 701 Cedar St. Edmonds,--Wk 98020 Dear Ms. Taylor: SUBJECT: FROZEN METER Z y 1 4w, LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR Thank you for Your letter regarding your meter problem. Anytime you have a problem with your water or sewer, I request you give the City a call before calling a plumber. I had our Meter Section check your meter to see if there was any problem. It looked as though it only froze because of no usage during the period you were away from home. Please note, turning off your meter may not help if we have another cold spell. If it does freeze again, please let us know so something can be done. If you should have any questions, please feel free to give Archie Brena, Water/Sewer Section Supervisor, a call at 771-3202, extension 293. Sincerely, STREET FILE 'BOBBY R. MILLS Superintendent of Public Works BRM/ml Z RtNA DT fk(�� DT / I PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING IAO t r -15 -IN 10 I AT 114, AV 114, SECT10.1V 25, F#rP 27 N, R 3 F, FND. SSMH WITH A PUNCH MARK ON VEST RIM OF MAN HOLE WALNUT STREET PER R/S #200407295007 M89*59'18*E GRAPIUC SCAlE IN MT) 1 Inch 20 & ALLEY z SET CONC.N & TAG LS.22688 L N89*52*51*E 9JO, : 59.98, ;a CS 3 at SPOT —x ELEV.-157.8 LOT I L07T 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 SPOT —x 6 64V ELEV.-159.8 6 0 5M 0' Vi 4*00, ot it "a 40. 22.2' EL.-164.6 30' ROOF 21 7' 1 104 _j D 4 EL-166.9 i SPOT \ELEV. EL-173.3-x -171.32 — -X=.-164.7 : 10.4 163.4T '04,4;, C I NE. BLDG. � CDR:: AD DITION EAST OF PROMTY ',AJNE BY 0.19 1-iI61.4 EL-164.3 ROOF M F :jF.R. WOOD FNQ OfFSET 4.Y TO PF A C OFFSET ZOB' K OF ROOF GROUND EXSITING : WOOD ANCE:: F OOSET TO PROPEF W1601D 3.917 C WALKWAY I - rSE. BLDG. COR: WE� 9 __ WEST OF PROPERTY — /I/ MON SURVEYOWS NO THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF PARTIES WHOSE NAMES APPEAR HEREON ONLY. AND DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT EXPRESS RECERTIFICATION BY THE LAND SURVEYOR. #r ff. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT(S) I AND Z BLOCK 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS� ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS. PAGE(S) 4Z RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. STATE OF- WASHINGTON. OWNERS JEFFREY T. SURRIDGE AND TAMI SURRIDGE HUSBAND AND WIFE ASSUMED N89' 59' 141w BETWEEN MONUMENTS ON CEDAR STREET AS SHOWN ON MAP WAC 332-130-090 PROCEDURES USED IN THIS SURVEY WERE FIELD TRAVEIM MEETING OR EXCEEDING STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332-130-090. WAC 332-130-100 INSTRUMENTATION FOR THIS SURVEY WAS A SOXKIA SET 53CR 5 SECOND TOTAL STATION. MONUMENTS LAST VISITED 11/8/2005 LEIM .. FOUND RE13AR AND CAP AS NOTED 0- FOUND REBAR NO CAP AS NOTED SET REBAR & CAP LS22688 SET CONC. NAIL & TAG LS22OW 0- CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT CALCULATION A.)161.4 RTY LINE C.)164.3 WOPERTY LINE TODIGM � 4-164.9 *22M jag.a MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT LINE FND. REBAR NO CAP /N. 0.128Y W. 0.04 BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AND CORNERS SET REPRESENT DEEM LOCATIONS - OWNERSHIP LINES MAY VARY. NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENT*. RESTRICTIONS. RESERVATIONS AND OCCUPATION WHICH MAY < ENCUMBER TITLE TO OR USE OF THIS PROPERTY. ALL INFORMATION USED IN CALCULATING THIS QIRVEY IS NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN OD -LSPOT (H)X—X(G) EL-174.4 E V::,175.8 rk �F 75.87 G G IEL�EV.-178.16 V.-175.96 N89"39'14*W FND. 4X4 CONC. MON CEDAR STREET WITH 2' BRASS DISK NTH *X7 PUNCH M04 MARK 0 THE NW. PROPERTY CORNER OF LOT 3. BLOCK 3 PLAT OF EDMONDS. EUEV.- 180.71 PER R/S 9206035003 i RESUB FND. 4X4 CONIC. MON JAN 04 2006 WITH 2* BRASS DISK WITH . X` PUNCH BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS im" RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ............................ SURVEYW'S CERTIFICATE DUNAWAY SURVEYING, INC. filed for record this ........ day of ............... 20 .... at This map correctly represents a survey mad* by RECIO.R.0 OF SURVEY 23201 53rd AVENUE SOUTHEAST ............ M In back ....... of ............... at page at the me or under my d1rection In conformance with the BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-1530 request of ............................................ DUNAWAY SURVEYING requirements of the survey recording act at the FOR OWN. BY DATE JOB No. roweat of Taml Surridge In November, SLH 11/23/2005 2005-049 409ZfD. Dunaway COPLIS .7,4ffY SURRIDOE CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET ............ wil;: ................................. ....... Cortiftate No. 22688 1 JDD 1" - 20' 1 1 OF I W M -n =.X=ww roo"O" M — /I/ MON SURVEYOWS NO THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF PARTIES WHOSE NAMES APPEAR HEREON ONLY. AND DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT EXPRESS RECERTIFICATION BY THE LAND SURVEYOR. #r ff. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT(S) I AND Z BLOCK 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS� ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS. PAGE(S) 4Z RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. STATE OF- WASHINGTON. OWNERS JEFFREY T. SURRIDGE AND TAMI SURRIDGE HUSBAND AND WIFE ASSUMED N89' 59' 141w BETWEEN MONUMENTS ON CEDAR STREET AS SHOWN ON MAP WAC 332-130-090 PROCEDURES USED IN THIS SURVEY WERE FIELD TRAVEIM MEETING OR EXCEEDING STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332-130-090. WAC 332-130-100 INSTRUMENTATION FOR THIS SURVEY WAS A SOXKIA SET 53CR 5 SECOND TOTAL STATION. MONUMENTS LAST VISITED 11/8/2005 LEIM .. FOUND RE13AR AND CAP AS NOTED 0- FOUND REBAR NO CAP AS NOTED SET REBAR & CAP LS22688 SET CONC. NAIL & TAG LS22OW 0- CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT CALCULATION A.)161.4 RTY LINE C.)164.3 WOPERTY LINE TODIGM � 4-164.9 *22M jag.a MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT LINE FND. REBAR NO CAP /N. 0.128Y W. 0.04 BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AND CORNERS SET REPRESENT DEEM LOCATIONS - OWNERSHIP LINES MAY VARY. NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENT*. RESTRICTIONS. RESERVATIONS AND OCCUPATION WHICH MAY < ENCUMBER TITLE TO OR USE OF THIS PROPERTY. ALL INFORMATION USED IN CALCULATING THIS QIRVEY IS NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN OD -LSPOT (H)X—X(G) EL-174.4 E V::,175.8 rk �F 75.87 G G IEL�EV.-178.16 V.-175.96 N89"39'14*W FND. 4X4 CONC. MON CEDAR STREET WITH 2' BRASS DISK NTH *X7 PUNCH M04 MARK 0 THE NW. PROPERTY CORNER OF LOT 3. BLOCK 3 PLAT OF EDMONDS. EUEV.- 180.71 PER R/S 9206035003 i RESUB FND. 4X4 CONIC. MON JAN 04 2006 WITH 2* BRASS DISK WITH . X` PUNCH BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS im" RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ............................ SURVEYW'S CERTIFICATE DUNAWAY SURVEYING, INC. filed for record this ........ day of ............... 20 .... at This map correctly represents a survey mad* by RECIO.R.0 OF SURVEY 23201 53rd AVENUE SOUTHEAST ............ M In back ....... of ............... at page at the me or under my d1rection In conformance with the BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-1530 request of ............................................ DUNAWAY SURVEYING requirements of the survey recording act at the FOR OWN. BY DATE JOB No. roweat of Taml Surridge In November, SLH 11/23/2005 2005-049 409ZfD. Dunaway COPLIS .7,4ffY SURRIDOE CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET ............ wil;: ................................. ....... Cortiftate No. 22688 1 JDD 1" - 20' 1 1 OF I W M -n =.X=ww roo"O" M -LSPOT (H)X—X(G) EL-174.4 E V::,175.8 rk �F 75.87 G G IEL�EV.-178.16 V.-175.96 N89"39'14*W FND. 4X4 CONC. MON CEDAR STREET WITH 2' BRASS DISK NTH *X7 PUNCH M04 MARK 0 THE NW. PROPERTY CORNER OF LOT 3. BLOCK 3 PLAT OF EDMONDS. EUEV.- 180.71 PER R/S 9206035003 i RESUB FND. 4X4 CONIC. MON JAN 04 2006 WITH 2* BRASS DISK WITH . X` PUNCH BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS im" RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ............................ SURVEYW'S CERTIFICATE DUNAWAY SURVEYING, INC. filed for record this ........ day of ............... 20 .... at This map correctly represents a survey mad* by RECIO.R.0 OF SURVEY 23201 53rd AVENUE SOUTHEAST ............ M In back ....... of ............... at page at the me or under my d1rection In conformance with the BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-1530 request of ............................................ DUNAWAY SURVEYING requirements of the survey recording act at the FOR OWN. BY DATE JOB No. roweat of Taml Surridge In November, SLH 11/23/2005 2005-049 409ZfD. Dunaway COPLIS .7,4ffY SURRIDOE CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET ............ wil;: ................................. ....... Cortiftate No. 22688 1 JDD 1" - 20' 1 1 OF I W M -n =.X=ww roo"O" M M04 MARK 0 THE NW. PROPERTY CORNER OF LOT 3. BLOCK 3 PLAT OF EDMONDS. EUEV.- 180.71 PER R/S 9206035003 i RESUB FND. 4X4 CONIC. MON JAN 04 2006 WITH 2* BRASS DISK WITH . X` PUNCH BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS im" RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ............................ SURVEYW'S CERTIFICATE DUNAWAY SURVEYING, INC. filed for record this ........ day of ............... 20 .... at This map correctly represents a survey mad* by RECIO.R.0 OF SURVEY 23201 53rd AVENUE SOUTHEAST ............ M In back ....... of ............... at page at the me or under my d1rection In conformance with the BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-1530 request of ............................................ DUNAWAY SURVEYING requirements of the survey recording act at the FOR OWN. BY DATE JOB No. roweat of Taml Surridge In November, SLH 11/23/2005 2005-049 409ZfD. Dunaway COPLIS .7,4ffY SURRIDOE CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET ............ wil;: ................................. ....... Cortiftate No. 22688 1 JDD 1" - 20' 1 1 OF I W M -n =.X=ww roo"O" M W M -n =.X=ww roo"O" M STREET FILE FIESUB 4 206 Dr BUILD114G Is civ or- EDMOND is 0 0 M < fn Q 0 ril 0M 0 -1, C=, CO) M M M 0 M 0 FND. SSMH WITH A PUNCH MARK ON WEST RIM OF MAN HOLE PER R/S #200407295007 I z 0 P co (0 .0: 01 (A 01, Lij _17 3 0' jVT 114, jV#T. 114, WALNUT STREET GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. SECT101V 26- '4 N 89 *59'1 8"E 660.96' 77X 27 _/V . ;9 R 3 E;p ALLEY 5.2' N89*52'51"E 9!0, 59.98' N 89 * 52 ' 51 "E 59.98 El SURVEYOR'S NOTES THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE C S T L T C3 C EXCLUSIVE USE OF PARTIES WHOSE NAMES E� LEAD TACK LOT 3 & 'TAGS IN APPEAR HEREON ONLY, AND DOES NOT EXTEND TO TIES WITHOUT EXPRESS ROi�KS 6.0 NEW LOT LINE: IS 1.4' ANY UNNAMED THIRD PAR LOT 1 L 9 11..._A&___FROM OLD LOt LINE RECERTIFICATION BY THE LAND SURVEYOR. 4.15' LTMF AKIrl DADAI I CT 12: 01) to I _f� 01 ('j 0-1 I : (A 0 0 FND. 4X4 CONC. MON WITH 2" BRASS DISK WITH "X" PUNCH 5.33' BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AND CORNERS SET 60.6, 58.0' LOT 4 REPRESENT DEED LOCATIONS — OWNERSHIP LINES DECK 6 �.5' MAY VARY. NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS AREA NEW PROP.. EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT LOT 2 —LINE PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, 5.43 k RESERVATIONS AND OCCUPATION WHICH MAY OLD PR P Z a C� ENCUMBER TITLE TO OR USE OF THIS PROPERTY. S.F.R. LINE -1 NE. BLDG. COfZ 11RWEST OF NEW:PROPERTY ALL INFORMATION USED IN CALCULATING THIS ::9 LINE BY 1.21' SURVEY IS NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN. 22.2' INSIDE ANGLE POINT IS 6.21' TO NEW PROPERTY LINE f-WOOD FNC. OFFSET 2.9'TO NEW PROPERTY LINE =76MGUTTER OFFS�T 0.78' OLD PROP. TO NEW PROPERTY LINE (THE GUTTER LINL IS THE CLOSEST POINT FROM HOUSE TO NEW LOT LINE) LINE 21.7' WOOD FNC. OFJFSET 2.37 WOOD 0 NEW PROPeRTY LINE FND. REBAR NO CAP WALKWAX 14', SE. BLDG. COR: N. 0.12 BY W. 0.04 11 WEST OF NEW PROPERTY ____N89'59'14"W IA/ LKE—BY 1.51' : 61.30' "\NEW LOT LINE IS 1.4' '91 4.91 FROM OLD LOT LINE AND PARALLEL FND. 4" SURFACE MON WITH PUNCH 30' 01, LLJ 00 OL. I LF-MU OL I MUM FND. 4X4 CONC. MON & TAG 22688 WITH 2" BRASS DISK CEDAR STREET IN BIG ROCK N89*59'14"W WITH "X" PUNCH 658.77' -1/— SUR V RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ............................ filed for record this ........ day of ..... , ......... 20 .... at ............ M in book ....... of ........ ...... at page ..... at the request of .... ........................................ DUNAWAY SURVEYING ........................................... ........................................... Mgr Supt. of. Records This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of t4e sur,vey recording act at the request of Tami Surridge In November, 2QO5. n D. Dunaway CRA.S Certificate No. 22688 bi C� P — 0) 0 THE S JV0H0JVjSH /'� '_WY7 L./ k-.,F t CEJ04R FJjVj RUS77 _L Z-a Z IV _77 X ff. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT(S) 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 42, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. OWNERS THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY CEDAR FAMILY TRUST BASIS OF BEARING ASSUMED N89* 59' 14"W BETWEEN MONUMENTS ON CEDAR STREET AS SHOWN ON MAP WAC 332-130-090 PROCEDURES USED IN THIS SURVEY WERE FIELD TRAVERSE, MEETING OR EXCEEDING STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332-130-090. WAC 332-130-100 INSTRUMENTATION FOR THIS SURVEY WAS A SOKKIA SET 530R 5 SECOND TOTAL STATION. MONUMENTS LAST VISITED 11/8/2005 LEGEND 0= FOUND REBAR NO CAP AS NOTED SET REBAR & CAP LS22688 A=,SET CONC. NAIL & TAG LS22688 &= CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND REVISED 12/19/2006 DUNAWAY SURVEYING, INC. 23201 53rd AVENUE SOUTHEAST BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-1530 DWN. BY SLH DATE 11/14/2005 JOB No. 2005-049 REVISED 12/19/2006 CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET JDD its = 20' 1 OF 1 / VE 114 Vfr 114 P 127 _/V. R. 3 E. ;� SECT16)-IV 125� TX FND. SSMH WITH A PUNCH MARK ON WEST RIM OF . �j N-THLE MAN HOLE T' WALNUT STREET PER R/S #200407295007, N89*59'1 8"E 660.96' STREET FILE" GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET I inch = 20 ft. 1z ALLEY 5.29 0 N89*52'51"E BO Zi/ FND. 4" SURFACE MON WITH PUNCH Nj C-0 0 --i. 59.98' P (0 CR. 00 9!0, ------- z SUR\,EYOR'S NOTES ('t C4 --: 0 0 0i 0 THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE SE� LEAD TACK '::t c! LOT 3 EXCLUSIVE USE OF PARTIES WHOSE NAMES & 'TAGS IN APPEAR HEREON ONLY, AND DOES NOT EXTEND TO W' KS 6.02' NEW LOT LINE'IS 1.4' ANY UNNAMED THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT EXPRESS LOT 1 FROM OLD LOT LINE RECERTIFICATION BY THE LAND SURVEYOR. 4.15'—' AND PARALLEL ___5 33' BOUrIDARY LINES SHOWN AND CORNERS SET IN Uj z 0 co (0 _�: C4 22.2' 30, 21.7' 30.00, FND. 4X4 CONC. MON WITH 2" BRASS DISK WITH "X" PUNCH 60.6' I LOT 4 REPRESENT DEED LOCATIONS — 0 NERSHIP LINES 58.0' DECK 6z.5' MAY VARY. NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS LOT1AREA NEW PROP., EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT 2 —LINE PURFIORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, 5.43' RFSMVATIONS AND OCCUPATION WHICH MAY OLD PR P. z 0 ENCUMBER TITLE TO OR USE OF THIS PROPERTY. LINE t\jt7 Pi nc-, rnr?' S.F.R. C;0 q Wr-(ZT r)r tsipAi :PPr)pFPTY ALL INFORMATION USED IN CALCULATING THIS LINE BY 1.21' SURVEY IS NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN. INSIDE ANGLE-� POINT IS 6.21' TO NEW PROPERTY Llk 4 WOOD FNC. OFFSET 2.9'TO NEW PROPERTY LINE "GUTTER OFFSET 0.78' TO NEW PROPERTY LINE OLD PROP. I WE IC TUV f-1 nCVCT DnIKIT MMA t-In"'ZP Tn NEW LOT LINEI k mr- Ir-r% LINE ot WOOD FNC. OFFSET 2.37 0 NEW PROP�RTY LINE FHD. REBAR NO CAP WOOD SE. BLDG . COR: N. 0.12 BY W. 0.04 WALKWAX-. 114 T—T WEST OF NEW OROPERTY N89*5b'l 4"W 61.30' \NEW LOT LINE IS 1.4' 4.9, FROM OLD LOT LINE AND PARALLEL SET LEAD & TACK & TAG 22688 CEDAR STREET IN BIG ROCK N89'59'14"W RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ............................ filed for record this ........ day of ..... , ......... 20 .... at ............ M in book ....... of ............... at page ..... at the request of ............................................. DUNAWAY SURVEYING .................................................... ........................................... Mgr Supt, of Records 658.77' 12 Lij -E F_ 00 1' 30, FND,r. 4X4 CONC. MON WITH 2" BRASS DISK WITH "X" PUNCH 1,-- — rl- 0 z 0') Cq X ff. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT(S) 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 42, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. OWNERS THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY CEDAR FAMILY TRUST BASIS OF BEARING ASSUMED N89' 59' 14"W BETWEEN MONUMENTS ON CEDAR STREET AS SHOWN ON MAP WAC 332-130-090 PROCEDURES USED IN THIS SURVEY WERE FIELD TRAVERSE, MEETING. OR EXCEEDING STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332-130-090. WAC 332-130-100 INSTRUMENTATION FOR THIS SURVEY WAS -A SOKKIA SET 530R 5 SECOND TOTAL STATION. MONUMENTS LAST VISITED 11/8/20b5 LEGEND 0= FOUND REBAR NO CAP AS NOTED SET REBAR & CAP LS22688 SET CONC. NAIL & TAG LS22688 CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND REVISED 12/19/2006 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE T RECY01-12-T OF SURVEY I DUNAWAY SURVEYING, INC. This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the survey recording act at the request of Tami Surridg'e In November, 2 05 FOR TiVE SJV0H0ff1SH _77 23201 53rd AVENUE SOUTHEAST BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-1530 DWN. BY SLH DATE 11/14/2005 REVISED 12/19/2006 JOB No. 2005-049 4��n D. Dunaway (P.6.S tificate No. 22688 _Z I Z, CEj 0,4 R P, 4 ffl CHKD. BY JDD SCALE SHEET 1 20P 1 1 OF 1