The URL can be used to link to this page

7029 212TH ST SW (2).PDFiiiiiiii lill 2732 7029 212TH ST SW of FWA)410 CITY OF EDMONDS c 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 1%91 (OPY RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Environmental Determination for the construction of a new commercial building. The project will be located at 7029 212" St. SW. and is zoned CG, General Commercial. The proposed project will also include approximately 4,500 cu. yd. of grading. (City of Edmonds File No. ADB-99-243) I Proponent: Carletti Architects, PS, 2204 Riverside Drive Suite 270, Mount Vernon, WA qR2gCEIVED Location of proposal, including street address if any: 7029 212,h St. SW APR 13 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR, Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An envirorunental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by February 16, 2000. Responsible Official: Robert Chave Position/Title:Planning Manager, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 ' Address: City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: 2, 17Z Lo" XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than February 16, 2000, by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Jeffrey S. Wilson to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on February 2, 2000, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. Pagel of2 99243ED.DOC 212/00.SEPA Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: .V'xx� Environmental Review Section xx bep;i;,tment16f` Ecology % dl�mpia,WA 98504-7703 xx Washington State Dept. of Transportation xx TSM&P/Land Developer 15700 Dayton Avenue North Seattle, WA 98133, Edmonds School District No. 15 Attn.: Bret Carlstad, Planning and Property Manager 20420 68th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 Community Transit Attn.: Brent Russell 1133 164th Street Southwest, #200 Lynnwood, WA 98037 Peter Carletti — Carletti Architects, PS 2204 Riverside Drive, Suite 270 Mount Vernon, WA 98723 xx MITIGATING MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSAL: I THE APPLICANT WILL CONTRIBUTE A TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE OF $26,316 AS DETERMINED BY THE COLLEGE PLACE TRAFFIC AREA REPORT. Attachments: Environmental Checklist Vicinity Mapi Site Plan I Traffic Report pc: File No. ADB-99-243 SEPA Notebook Page 2 of 2 99243ED.DOC 21VOO . SEPA SEPA APPLICATION PROJECT: Magic Toyota APPLICANT: do Carletti-Ardiitects Fee Paid: Receipt No. A.BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Magic Toyota Satellite Service Facility 2. Name of applicant David Broadus, c/o Peter Carletti, Carletti Architects, P.S. 21300 Highway 99 Edmonds, WA 98026 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: c/o Peter Carletti Carletti Architects, P.S. 2204 Riverside Drive, Suite 270 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Contact: Peter Carletti, (360) 424-0394 Page 1 12/30/99 RECEIVED DEC 3 0 1999 PERMIT COUNTER 4. Date checklist prepared: Wednesday, December 29, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds, Washington 6. Proposed project timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): We will apply for building permit on approximately January 30, 2000. We will begin construction on the project as soon as building permits, SEPA, and ADB review process are completed. We anticipate construction commencing approximately April 1, 2000 and completing on approximately July 15, 2000. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Level One environmental audit and good fait h asbestos survey have both been completed on the subject property. Staff review, with regards to Critical Areas, has been completed on the property. Traffic report is being prepared at this time. Geotechnical report has been completed on the subject property. 9. Do you "ow of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. RM SEPA APPLICATION PROJECT: Magic Toyota APPLICANT: do Carletti—Architects Page 2 12/30/99 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known. Fill and grade permit, build ing permit, mec hanical, electrical, and plumbing permits, architectural design review board approval. 11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects ofyour proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The site is an existing lot that is approximately 54,620 square feet, or 1.25 acres. The site currently contains an existing single family residence that will. be demolished to make way for a new satellite service facility for Magic Toyota. The new service facility building will be approximately 14,538 square feet. The satellite service facility will be used only as a service facility that the public will not have any access to. The public will still drop off their vehicles at the existing Magic Toyota dealership building and the cars will be shuttled back to the service facility to be repaired and returned or delivered to the customer at the dealersihp destination. 12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, please provide the. range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map if possible. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit application). The addresses of the existing residence on the proposed lot is: 7029 — 212'h Street SW. Edmonds, WA 98026 The legal description is on the attached site plan documents and the abbreviated legal is: Lots 4 and 5 Block 6 platt of Seattle Heights Division #4 in Snohomish County, Washington in Volume 9 of the Platts, page I I records of Snohomish County, Volume 19 of Surveys, page 63 records of Snohomish County. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (Indicate one): flat, (rollingl, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainousi other. SEPA APPLICATION Page 3 PROJECT: Magic Toyota 12130/" APPLICANT: do Carletti—Architects b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approx imate % slope)? 5% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sa nd, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agriculture soils, please specify and note any prime farmland. The soils are classified as Alderwood-Urban Land Complex 2-8% slope. The soils encountered, per the soils report that has been prepared, is that the underlying sand ranges from poorly graded sand with silt, Unified Soil Classification SP-SM to poorly graded sand (SP). d. Are there surface indications or history -of unstable soils in the inunediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate qu antities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of REL Approximately 3100 cubic yards of excavation or cut and 1200 cubic yards of fill are anticipated to establish the building footprint area and the parking lot improvements. The source of the import for fill will be provided from an off -site source that is unknown at this time. All export of cut material will be taken off -site to an undertimed location. f. Could erosion occur I as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. As with all construction, some erosion could occur. Erosion and sedimentation control devices will be installed during construction to prevent debris and materials from entering the storm system. g. About what percent of the site wffl be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The existing site area totals: 54,620 square feet The proposed impervious surfaces for the building is: 14,538 square feet The total impervious for the parking lot is: 30,804 square feet The total site covered by impervious surfaces will be: 45,342 square feet, 83% The landscape area remaining is: 9,278 square feet Total landscape percentage of site is: 17% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: All runoff from construction activities will be controlled, per the requirements of the Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. A fence will be installed around the perimeter of the site at locations necessary to prevent silt ladden storm runoff from exiting the subject property. A temporary construction entrance, with quarry spalls will also be installed at the entrance to prevent dirt from entering onto the public right of way. All erorsion control measures will conform to the City of Edmonds standards. SEPA APPLICATION Page 4 PROJECT: Magic Toyota 12130/" APPLICANT: do Carletti—Architects 2. Air I a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automotive, odors, industrial wood smoke), during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Excavation equipment during site work. Normal enuissions associated with construction and project completion. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: . During construction, construction vehicles will be maintained so that they are operating efficiently. 3. Water I a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetlands)? If yes, describe type, provide names, and if known, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? if yes, please describe and attach available plans. Not applicable. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 year flood plain? Note location on the site plan, if any. No. 1 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. SEPA APPLICATION Page 5 PROJECT: Magic Toyota 12/30/99 APPLICANT: do Carletti—Architects No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged.? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm wate 1) Describe the source of runoff and storm water method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow Into other waters? If so, please describe Storm water run-off from the proposed building roof and proposed asphalt areas will be collected by a series of on -site catch basins.. This water will then be piped to a combined detention/water quality tank prior to discharge to the. City of Edmonds storm system. Water quantity/quality measures will meet the requirements of the Puget Sound Water Quality Design Manual. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Discharge rate and water quality of surface water will be controlled by a buried combined detention/wa. . ter quality tank. SEPA APPLICATION PROJECT: Magic Toyota Page 6 APPLICANT: do Carletti—Architects 12130/99 4. Vegetation a. Check or Indicate types of vegetation found on the site: -deciduous tree:' alder, maple, aspen, other --X—evergreen tree:, fircedar, pine, others x -shrubs __"rass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants:. cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfbil, other x other types of 'vegetation: blackberry brambles b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing trees and'vegetation on -site will be removed in order to accommodate the proposed building footprint and parking lot improvements. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve o . r enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping for the new building will be in conformance with the City of Edmonds Landscaping Ordinance and ZoningCodes. In addition, we are providing a planting plan to off -set the removal of existing trees and vegetation. 5. Fish and Wildlife a. Indicate any birds and animals which have been observed on or known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, agAgbirds other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, tro�t, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened oi endangered species known to be on near th e site. None known. C. Is the site part of a mi gration route? If so, explain: Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to� preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. SEPA APPLICATION Page 7 PROJECT: Magic Toyota 12130/99 APPLICANT: do Carletti—Architects 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projectis energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity for lighting and cooling, natural gas for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? An energy efficient building will be designed and constructed, according to the NREC requirements. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any? See 6c above. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There is the slight possibility of some hazardous waste of anti -freeze arid/or waste oil that could leak to the ground water. b. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required. c. What are the. proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Any minor spillage of used oils or anti -freeze from servicing of vehicles will go into the storm drainage system, which will then be treated by the water. quality/detention tank prior to discharge to the City's storm water system. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently occupied by a single family residence of approximate ly 1,200 square feet. We are proposing to demolish and remove the existing residence and replace it with a new one-story, pre- engineered steel satellite service facility of approximately 14,538 gross square feet. The site is located on 212'h Street SW, approximately one block w est of the intersection of 212'h Street and Highway 99. Immediately to the west of our property is a retaining wall and the City of Edmonds Utility Shops and Sanitation Department. Directly. north of our site are other existing commercial. establishments. Directly east of our site is Highway 99 and on the opposite side of Highway 99 are other existing SEPA APPLICATION Page 8 PROJECT: Magic Toyota 12/30/99 APPLICANT: do Carletti—Architects commercial establishments varying in use and character. Directly south of our property is an existing automobile dealership, Magic Toyota, of which this new proposed facility will be a satellite service facility. b. Has the site been used for agriculture purposes? If so, describe No. c. Describe any structures on the site: As previously mentioned, there exists a single family, one-story residence of approximately 1,200 gross square feet. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what Yes, the single family residence will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CG-2. is the current zoning of the property. L What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Highway 99 Activity Center. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. 1. What are proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposal is compatible with current comp plan designation. It matches other commercial activity uses located within this area. J. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately ten to twelv6 people will work in the proposed building. L Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No residents will be removed from each existing single family residence, as it is vacant. 1. What are proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement or other impacts, if any: None. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many, units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. One single family residence of low income is being elimin ated. SEPA APPLICATION Page 9 PROJECT: Magic Toyota 12t3O/" APPLICANT: cto Carletti—Architects c. What are proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Noise a. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. b. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours would come from the site 7:30 am to 5:00 pm will be typical construction hours, Monday through Friday. Upon completion of construction, the site will be occupied by the business operation from approximately 7:30 am to 5:30 pm, Monday through Friday. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: During constructiow Equipment to be fitted with noise suppression mufflers as required by law. After installation is complete: No measures will be proposed to reduce or control noise impacts, as it is not applicable. 11. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest point of the proposed building will be at twenty-seven feet to the peak ridge of the top of the metal roofing. The principal building material s proposed will include metal roofing, metal siding, and a four foot high split faced concrete masonry veneer around the perimeter of the building. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? Provide attractive color scheme and material uses, which will coordinate and compliment the surrounding commercial properties, including the City of Edmonds Sanitation and Shops Department. SEPA APPLICATION Page 10 PROJECT: Magic Toyota 12130/99 APPLICANT: do Carletti—Architects 12. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The project will produce minimal glare from exterior wall pack lighting. Any glare produced will be minimal, due to the fact tl�,at the devices can be fitted with cut-off throw devices to prevent glare from spreading to surrounding Oroperties. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing oft -site sources of ligh t or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 13. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Various City parks. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 14. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or, proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural import ance known to be on the site. None observed or known. c. What are the proposed m� I easures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None proposed. SEPA APPLICATION Page 11 PROJECT: Magic Toyota 12/30/99 APPLICANT: do Carietti—Architects 15. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Highway 99 runs north/south and is approximately one block east of the eastern property line of the subject property. 212'b Street SW runs east/west on the southern property line of the subject property. Please refer to the attached site plan and vicinity map. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The approximate distance to the nearest bus stop is 200 feet. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliniinate? The completed project would have space for approximately 71 vehicles. The stalls will serve as overflow parking for vehicles being serviced and having completed service, as well as for the employees that work at the facility. There will be no parking required for the public, as they will not be visiting the project. All vehicles will be driven from the main dealership building. to the satellite facility. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to any existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new streets or roads will be required. Modification and improvement of the existing curb cuts will be required for our proposal. e. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. E How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. A traffic study is being prepared by a sub -consultant, and will be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval for mitigation of any traffic impacts. Vehicle trips for the proposed new business will be of minimal impact. g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: No adverse traffic impacts are anticipated. S EPA APPLICATION Page 12 PROJECT: Magic Toyota 12/30/99 APPLICANT: do Carletti—Architects 16. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The addition of this proposed satellite service facility will not cause any increased need for public. services, as the site is curr6ntly being s erved. b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Energy efficient design and fixtures, and water saving fixtures. 17. Utilities a. Indicate utilities currently available at the site: electricily, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitaKy sewer, septic system, other: b. Describe the utilities which are proposed,for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the inunediate vicinity which might be needed. Power is to be provided by Snohomish County P.U.D. Gas is to be provided by Puget Sound Energy. Telephone services are to be provided by GTE. Water is to be provided by the City of Edmonds. Sewer is to be provided by the City of Edmonds. Cable service is to be provided by Chambers. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decisions. A ® F� 59 - N� r -1 711 RM-1.5 If A -Y -T �j �LSUB� �J� E C T S I T E FILE NO. ADB-99-243 2UTH ST RM-1.5 Vicinity Map Magic Toyota 7029 212th St SW New Service Center 177 tv Jy Attachment 1 CAMMAacmITICTS P.S. a -.% ori" 17o RvI=WA M73 4. A NEW 6ERV= FACMM Fox MASIC TOYOTA TOM IOTM AM B& EOMOMM WA, ........ ------ mmcm=c�m MMro7M FOUNDATION STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS for MAGIC TOYOTA SATELLITE SERVICE BUILDING 7029-212 T" Avenue Southwest Edmonds, WA Prepared by GOEDEIKE ENGINEERING 17119 SE 47th Court Bellevue, WA 98006-5805 Phone (425) 54.4-5899 Fax (425) 401-1250 C. Gregg Goedeke, P.E. Structural Englneer RECiEIVED APR 13 2000 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS EXPRES: 101281 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY MAGIC TOYOTA SATTELITE SERVICE 7029212 TH AVENUE SOUTHWEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON . RECEIVED for APR 1 3 2000 Magic Toyota DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTFL CITY OF EDMONDS DECEMBER 5A1999 SUR""EET FILE GeoTest Services Inc. COMPLETE ENGINEERING GEOLOGY MATERIALS TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES 741 MARINE DRIVE - BELLINGHAM, WA 98225 (360)733-7318 FAX (360)733-7418 I GEO SERVICES, INC. Engineers, Geologists and WABO Special Inspectors 741 Marine Drive - Bellingham, WA 98225 * Phone 360.733.7318 Fax 360.733.7418 e.mail geotest@nas.com December 5, 1999 Job No. G9316 Magic Toyota 21300 Highway 99 Edmonds, Washington 98026 Attention: David Brbadus Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Magic Toyota Satellite Service 70292121hAvenue Southwest Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Broadus: This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering study for the proposed Magic Toyota service building to be located at 7029 2121h Avenue Southwest in Edmonds, Washington. This report has been completed in accordance with our proposal PR9926 dated June 1, 1999. The purpose of our services was to provide geotechnical design recommendations for the proposed development based on existing subsurface conditions and our site reconnaissance. Specifically, the scope of our services included the following tasks: 0 Excavation, logging and sampling of 6 test pits. 0 Site reconnaissance. 0 Perform geotechnical analysis to evaluate soil response to building loads. 0 Provide this written report containing a description of subsurface conditions, soil logs, and findings and recommendations pertaining to foundation design, earthwork and other geo.technical aspects of project development. PROJECT DESCRIPTION We understand it is proposed to construct a one story pre-engineered steel building with a 4 foot high masonry veneer. Asphalt paved parking and landscaping areas will occupy the remainder of the site. Grade modifications are not anticipated to exceed about 5 to 6 feet based on existing topography. Based on our experience with similar structures, structural loading is anticipated to be on the order of 2 kips per lineal foot for continuous footings, 30 to 60 kips for column footings and 200 pound per square foot for floor slabs. These loads include dead plus live loads. Page 1 of 8 ALV-Pmp� OsoWapc 7"�"WIRMOc Tov OU RepwOwp GeoTest- Services, Inc. December 5, 1999 Magic Toyota Satellite Service, Edmonds, WA Project G9316 Should the anticipated loads b e incorrect, or change, we should be allowed to review our recommendations with respect to the actual loading conditions. ISITE DESCRIPTION The site is located at 7029 212thAvenue Southwest in Edmonds, Washington (Vicinity Map, Figure 1). Located on the edge of residential and retail areas, the site is bounded primarily by various types of retail businesses to the north and east, by 212thAvenue Southwest to the south and by a light industrial parcel to the west. The site is currently developed with a single family residence in the northern portion of the site. The remainder of the site consists of a gravel drive and various types of brush. Site topography is dominated by a small mound in the northern portion, where the house is located. Drainage gradients for the site radiate from this mound in all directions. At the base of.the mound on the south side, there is a relatively flat and level gravel parking area., There is about 20 feet of elevational change from 2121hAvenue up to the location of the house. SUBSURFACE Our subsurface exploration was performed on November 10, 1999. Test pits were excavated with a rubber tired mounted backhoe. Six test pits were excavated to a maximum exploration depth of 10 feet beneath the existing ground surface. Following is a generalized description of the conditions encountered. For a more detailed description, refer to the attached test pit logs. In general, our test pits exposed a fills overlying poorly graded sand with varying amounts of silt. In the lower portion of the site, a 4 foot layer of peat was observed between the fill and the native sand. Fills typically consisted of silty sand with gravel and various types of debris. The fill was observed to be loose to medium dense and ranged in thickness up to about 4 feet. The underlying sand ranged in classification from poorly graded sand with silt (Unified Soil Classification SP-SM) to poorly graded sand (SP). The native sand was observed to be in a medium dense condition near the top of the layer becoming denser with depth. Peat was observed in TP-6 between 5 and 9 feet beneath the existing ground surface. Moisture contents within the soft peat ranged from 246 up to 324 percent. The native sand was observed beneath the peat. GROUNDWATER Groundwater was observed at a depth of about 5 feet in test pit TP-6 -within the peat. Groundwater levels are not static and vary with respect to surface runoff, precipitation, season and other factors. In general, groundwater levels are higher during the wetter winter months, October through June. I Page 2 of 8 M:%*m*W GeMaoc TcycWG931&Aag1c Toy OES NpaKkvp I Geo-rest Services, Inc. December 5,1999 Magic Toyota Satellite Service, Edmonds, WA Project G9316 DISCUSSION AND RECOM MENDATIONS General Based on the results of our en gineering* analyses, it is our opinion that the building may be constructed as planned pro vided our recommendations are incorporated into the final design and construction specifications for the project. Foundations may be supported by competent native soil or structural fill depending on site grades. Floor slabs may be similarly supported. More detailed information is contained in following sections of this report. The primary item of concern for construction is the depth of the utilities in the southern portion of the site. Should these utilities be deep enough to expose the peat, we recommend the peat be removed from beneath the utility alignment. Also there is the potential for consolidation of the peat after placement of fills in the southern portion of the site. More detailed information is provided in the Utility Trench Backfill section of this report. This report in its entirety, including subsurface exploration, should be included in the contract documents for the information of the contractor. Site Preparation Construction areas should be stripped and cleared of all vegetation, topsoil, and other deleterious material. Following stripping and clearing operations, earthwork operations may commence to provide design grades. Load bearing areas and areas to be filled should be observed by a GeoTest representative prior to placing fill. Proofrolling may be required in some areas. Loose or soft soils should be recompacted or replaced with structural fill. A geotextile, such as Mirafi 50OX or an equivalent, may be used to reduce the amount of overexcavation, if required. It should be noted that due to the high moisture content (246 to 324 percent) of the peat, there is a significant potential for settlement in the flat* southern portion of the site if fills are placed in this area. Settlement of this area can adversely effect utility grades for gravity system utilities (typically storm drains and sanitary sewers). If more than 12 inches of fill is placed in this area, we should be requested to provide appropriate recommendations if necessary. Soils observed during the subsurface exploration are moderately moisture sensitive due to their fines content. It appears the soil is currently near optimum moisture content and suitable for use as structural fill. Should the moisture content increase above optimum, existing soil may become difficult to work. Unless wet soil can be properly moisture conditioned, it should either be removed from the site, or used as landscaping material. Structural fill is defined as any material placed beneath slabs, foundations, pavement, sidewalks or other. load bearing areas. Structural fill may consist of any compactible, inorganic material during dry weather. During periods of wet weather, structural fill should consist of an inorganic, well graded material with less than 5 percent total silt and clay (material passing the #200 sieve). Structural fill should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined in accordance with the ASTM D-1557 (Modified Proctor) laboratory Page 3 of 8 MV*o*M OmWVc T"-0931W80C Toy GM R"�Wp I Geo`res-'� Services, Inc. December 5,1999 Magic Toyota Satellite Service, Edmonds, WA Project G9316 standard. Beneath pavements, the upper 24 inches should be compacted to a minimum 95 percent of maximum dry density. Material to be used as imported structural fill should be submitted to GeoTest prior to import for approval. Foundations Assuming compliance with the recommendations presented in the Site Preparation section, the buildings may be supported by conventional foundations bearing on undisturbed, competent native soil, or on structural fill. For foundations obtaining support as described, an allowable soil bearing capacity of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used for design. Loading of this magnitude will have a theoretical factor of safety in excess of 3 against actual shear failure. As the building may be supported by both structural fill and undisturbed native soil, we recommend additional reinforcement be placed in the footings in the transition area. The additional reinforcement will reduce the effects of differential settlement between the two soil conditions. Perimeter footings should have minimum widths of 16 inches and interior column footings should have minimum Widths of 24 inches. Perimeter footing subgrade should be at least 18 , inches beneath the lowest adjacent finish grade and interior footing subgrade should be at least 12 inches beneath finish floor elevation. A one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity may be used for short term dynamic loading conditions. Total settlement is anticipated to be less than 1 inch with less than one-half inch differential settlement. Most of the differential settlement should occur across the transition from undisturbed native soil to structural fill. Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction and passive soil pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundation. For passive pressure to develop, the foundation must either be poured 'neat' against undisturbed native soil,� or the excavation must be backfilled with structural fill. An equivalent fluid density.of 350 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) may be used for passive earth pressure. A friction coefficient of 0.35 may be used. These values are allowable and include a factor of safety of 1.5. Footing excavations should be observed by a GeoTest Services representative prior to placing forms or rebar in order to confirm conditions are as anticipated in this report; Slab -on -Grade Floors Floor slabs may be supported by competent native soil or by structural fill. Disturbed native soil must either be recompacted or replaced with structural fill. The slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free -draining sand or gravel. In areas where moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as 6-mil plastic, should be placed between the capillary break and the slab. Damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Page 4 of 8 MV^*ct. GwWa* ToycWG0316Ma* Toy GES R"*rLkvp GeoTest Services, Inc. December 5, 1999 Magic Toyota Satellite Service, Edmonds, WA Project G9316 Retaining Walls Depending on site grades, retaining walls may be required. Retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the retained soils. Walls designed to yield may be designed to resist an equivalent fluid weight of 35 pcf and walls not allowed to yield may be designed to resist an equivalent fluid weight of 45 pcf. These values assume that no surcharges due to sloping backfill, vehicle traffic, build,ing surcharges, hydrostatic pressure, or other surcharges will act on the wall. If other surcharges are to act on the wall, they should be added to the above design values. The passive earth pressure and friction value provided in the Foundations section of this report may be used to design the retaining walls. Retaining walls should be backfilled with at least an 18 inch width of drain rock in order to reduce the potential for hydrostatic. pressure buildup. The remainder of the backfill may consist of structural fill. A drain pipe should be placed at the base of the wall. The pipe should consist of rigid perforated, 4 inch diameter PVC pipe. The drain pipe should be bedded in at least one cubic foot per lineal foot of 3/8 inch pea gravel. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Sound Basin is classified as Seismic Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The largest earthquakes in the Puget Sound region have been subcrustal events, ranging in depth from 30 to 55 miles. Such deep events have exhibited no surface faulting. The UBC earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design base shear calculations. For design in accordance with the 1997* UBC, soil typeSD, Stiff Soil Profile, should be used for seismic design based on Table 16-J. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures with foundations founded in the liquefying soils. For liquefaction to occur, soils must be fine grained, loose to medium dense, cohesionless and beneath the water table. Normally, soils susceptible to liquefaction are water bearing fine sands and silts. In our opinion, the potential for liquefaction at this site is minimal due to the relative density of the soils encountered. Site Drainage Groundwater was observed at a depth of about 5 feet in test pit TP-6 within the peat. Should seepage be encountered in excavations, the water should be removed from the base of the excavation. Depending on the amount of seepage, the base of the excavation may be sloped to sump pits in order to collect the water for removal. During construction, the site should be graded such that surface water is directed off 'site. Water should not be allowed to stand in building or pavement areas. Exposed soils should be sealed at night to reduce the potential for infiltration by compacting the surface. Final grades should allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The ground surface should be Page 5 of 8 MVA*M GWW.* T".t.GM1W.* Ty OES Rw�dhw GeoTes'.,..Services, Inc. December 5, 1999 Magic Toyota Satellite Service, Edmonds, WA Project G9316 sloped at 3 percent within ten feet of the building. This gradient may be reduced to 2 percent in paved areas. Footing drains should be installed around the perimeter of the building. Footing drains should consist of 4 inch diameter, rigid, perforated PVC pipe bedded in one cubic foot of drain rock per lineal foot. The pipe should be located at, or below, the footing subgrade. There should be enough gradient to initiate flow to the discharge point. A typical detail is provided on Figure 3. Roof downspouts should be separately tightlined to a discharge facility and should not be connected to the footing drain. We suggest cleanouts be installed at strategic locations for the footing drain to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. Excavations and Sloms The following information is provided as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that GTS is assuming the responsibility for construction site safety. Such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. In no case should excavation slopes exceed the limits specified in local, state or federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our subsurface exploration, the existing native soils would classify as a Type B in accordance with OSHAA/VISHA regulations. Therefore, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped no steeper than 1H:1V in the native soil. Existing fill classifies as a Type C soil in accordance with OSHAfWISHA regulations. Therefore, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped no steeper than 1.5H:1V in the fill. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria upon request. Permanent slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H: 1 V. All slopes should be observed by a GTS representative during construction to confirm conditions are as anticipated. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow over the top of slopes. All permanent slopes should be seeded with an appropriate vegetative species to reduce erosion and improve the stability of the surficial soil layer. Utility Trench Backfill Soils anticipated to be exposed in the bottom of utility trenches should provide adequate support for utility pipes. However, there is the potential for the deeper utilities in the southern portion of the site to expose a layer of peat in the base of the trench. Should the peat be exposed, it should be removed from the utility alignment and replaced with a structural fill. Additionally it should be noted that due to the high moisture content (246 to 324 percent) of the peat, there is a significant potential for settlement in the flat southern portion of the site if fills are placed in this area. Settlement of this area can adversely effect utility grades for gravity system utilities (typically storm, drains and sanitary sewers). If more than 12 inches of fill is placed in this area, we should be requested to provide appropriate recommendations if necessary. Page 6 of 8 M V�� GOWAVC T*��MlMaoc T" GES ftp�Wp GeoTest Services, Inc. December 5, 1999 Magic Toyota Satellite Service, Edmonds, WA Project G9316 I Trench backfill is a major concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. Bedding material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve inches above the pipe crown before heavy compaction equipment is Used. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts with a loose thickness of twelve inches. A typical trench section and compaction recommendations for load supporting and non -load supporting areas is attached as Figure 4. Pavements The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the subgrade. In order to properly prepare the site for pavements, the pavement subgrade should be treated and compacted as described in the Site Preparation section of this report. This means that the upper 24 inches of structural fill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of maximum dry density based on ASTM D-1557 or should be in a 'firm and unyielding' condition prior to placement of the crushed, rock base. Soft or unstable areas should be overexcavated and backfilled with either structural fill or crushed rock. The following pavement section is recommended for lightly -loaded areas: * 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB), or 0 2 inches of AC over 3 inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). For. heavy traffic areas, the following sections may be used: * 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB, or 0 3 inches of AC over 4.5 inches of ATB. Asphalt concrete, asphalt treated base and crushed rock base should conform to current WSDOT standards. Crushed rock base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D-1 557. Limitations The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations provided in this report are based on conditions encountered at the time of the subsurface exploration performed by GeoTest Services, Inc. and our experience and judgment. Our work has been performed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Magic Toyota and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. We must presume the subsurface conditions encountered are representative for the proposed site. However, you, should be aware that subsurface conditions may vary with time and between exploratory locations, and unanticipated conditions may be encountered. . If construction reveals differing conditions or the design is modified, we should be retained to. reevaluate our recommendations and provide written confirmation or modification, as needed. Page 7 of 8 IAV-P� OwWA* T"GW1Wm* Toy GES Repwthwp GeoTes'., Services, Inc. Magic Toyota Satellite Service, Edmonds, WA December 5, 1999 Project G9516 IAdditional Services This office will be available to provide consultation services relating to review of the final design and specifications to Verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the approved construction plans and specifications. In addition, it is suggested that this office be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction to observe compliance with the design concepts and project specifications, and to facilitate design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. It should be noted that it is generally in the best interests of the owner/client to maintain the same geotechnical engineer during construction in order to obtain the project objective, with optimum quality control. In addition to the recommended geotechnical construction services, GeoTest Services is a fully accredited materials testing and special inspection agency. We would be pleased to discuss the full scope of services we can provide for this project. We are pleased to have been of service to you during the design phase of this project. If you have any questions regarding this report or other services we o ffer, please call. Sincerely, GeoTest Services, Inc. 0� Douglas S. Lynne, P.E. I Geotechnical Services Manager 7-Y" attachments: Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Test Pit Location Plan Figure 3 Typical Footing Drain Section Figure 4 Typical Utility Trench Section Plate 1 Soil Classification and Legend Plates 2 to 4 Test Pit Logs Plates 5 to 6 Grain Size Distribution Analyses cc: Carletti Architects, Attn: Peter Carletti Wilcox Construction Page 8 of 8 M O-PnOM 0=#Aoc T9yWwO931OMs& Toy GE3 R kvp .NORTH Z� GEOTEST SERVICES, INC. 741 Marine Drive Bellingham, WA 98225 phone: (360) 733-7318 fax: (360) 733-7418 reference map: Thomas Brothers Maps, 1997 page 455, Snohomish County Date: 11-30-99 By: DSL Scale: NONE Project - VICINITY MAP G9317 MAGIC TOYOTA SATELLITE SERVICE Figure 7029 212TH AVENUE SOUTHWEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Existing Building 212th Avenue Southwest 9 9 Not To Scale reference: FAX from Carletti ArcNtects Site Plan and Existing Features dated November 4, 1999 GEOTEST SERVICES, INC. Date: 11 -30-99 BY: DSL Scale: NONE Project 741 Madne Drtve TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN G9316 BeIringham, WA 98225 MAGIC TOYOTA SATELLITE SERVICE Figure gh.one: (360)733-7318 TH (360)733-7418 7029 212 AVENUESOUTHWEST 2 J EDMONDS, WASHINGTON GE.OTEST SERVICES, INC. 741 Marine Drive BeIringham, WA 98225 phone: (360) 733-7318 6� (360)733-7418 FOUR INCH DIAMETER, PERFORATED, RIGID PVC PIPE (perforations oriented down, wrapped in filter fabric) Date:12-2-99 I By: DSL I Scale: NONE — TYPICAL FOOTING DRAIN SECTION MAGIC TOYOTA SATTELITE SERVICE 7029212TH AVENUE SOUTHWEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Project G9316 Figure 3 Recommended Compaction (per ASTM 1557) LANDSCAPING AREAS E-IR P 1h % 'hw" IhN GEOTEST SERVICES, INC. 741 Marine Drive Bellingham, WA 98225 phone: (360) 733-7318 (360)733-7418 LOAD BEARING AREAS 95 bmif UTILITY PIPE Pipe Bedding Material Pavement Section 24inches MINIMUM Varies Structural Fill (see text for recommended material) Date: 12-2-99 1 By: DSL I Scale: NONE TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH SECTION MAGIC TOYOTA SATTELITE SERVICE 7029 212TH AVENUE SOUTHWEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON varies . Project G9316 Figure .4 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION MAJOR DIVISIONS DESCRIPTION Gravels with GW Well -graded gravels or gravel -sand mixtures GRAVELS less than (n 0 more than 50% 5% fines GP Poorly -graded gravels or gravel -sand mixtures _J U) coarse fraction GM Silty is larger than Gravels with -gravels or gravel -sand -silt mixtures a UJ 0 #4 sieve more than Z 12% fines . VNR. GC clayey gravels or g ravel -sand -clay mixtures Sands with SW Well -graded sand or gravelly mixtures W SANDS less than ....... 5% fines ....... SID Poorly graded sand or sand -silt mixtures < r_ more than 50% Sands, with with SM Silty sands or sand -silt mixtures 0 coarse fraction is Smaller than 0 E #4 sieve h n more than a 12% fines s SC Clay ey sands or sand -clay mixtures ML Inorganic silts & very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands w/ slight plasticity CO :� S SILTS AND CLAYS CL Inorganicclays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, 0 sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays Liquid Limit less than 5V Lu >� a; CD I � I I I OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity W) 0 < W 111111111 MH Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly 3 S 21 S clays, sandy clays, silty clays 0 CH Inorganic clays or high plasticity, fat clays W 2! z 0 SILTS AND CLAYS E Liquid Limit greater than 50 OH Organic clays of medium to highplastici ty HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS XXXXXX (XXXX)D PT Peat or other highly organic soils UNCONTROLLED FILL DUFF LAYER Uncontrolled fills, with variable constituents Humus and duff layer BEDROCK a BR Bedrock LEGEND. 0 GRAB SAMPLE 0 2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON SYMBOL I SAMPLE 11 SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE qu PENETROMETER READING, tsf SOIL CONSISTENCYa C TORVANE SHEAR READING, tsf — NON -COHESIVE SOILS COHESIVE SOILS Pcf DRY DENSITY, Pcf DESCRIPTION SPT-N-VALUE very loose 4 or less loose 6 to 10 DESCRIPTION SPT-N-VALUE vew soft 2 or less so 3 to 4 LL LIQUID LIMIT pl PLASTICITY INDEX medium dense 11 to 30 medium stiff 6 to 8 SA SIEVE ANALYSIS dense 31 to 60 very dense 61 or more stiff 9 to 15 gry stiff 16 to 30 GROUNDWATER LEVEL h rd 31 or more GEOTEST SERVICES, INC. 741 Madne Drtve Date: 12-2-99 By: DSL TScale: NONE Project G9316 SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND LEGEND Bellingham, WA 98225 MAGIC TOYOTA SATTELITE SERVICE 1 Plate phone: (360) 733-7318 6� 7029 212TH AVENUE SOUTHWEST (360)733-7418 1 EDMONDS , WASHINGTON 1 1 Moist. N/DCP Depth Tests % BbAG14� Sample Elev. Ft. uscs Soil Descrii)tion TP-1 11 -10-99] 10.7 SM FILL: brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist becomes gray 5— SM brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, 9.6 moist becomes dense to very dense 10.2 ................ SP grades to gray poorly graded SAND with gravel,' veQ1 dense� moist 10— Test pit terminated at 9 feet below existing grade. No groundwater observed during excavation. 15- 20 Moist. N/DCP Depth Tests % Bbw4" Sample Elev. Ft. uscs Soil Descriotion � TP-2 11-10-991 SM FILL: gray silty SAND with gravel, medium 14.0 dense, moist -0 ...... GIP- light brown poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and 5— I GM sand, medium dense, damp 3.5 ... ....... SP- gray poorly graded SAND with silt, dense, moist 7.6 SM 10 Test pit terminated at 10 feet below existing grade. No groundwater was observed during excavation. 15— GEOTEST SERVICES, INC. Date: 12-3-99 1 By: DSL I Scale: NONE Project 741 Marine Drive TEST PIT LOGS G9316 —L Bellingham, WA 98225 MAGIC TOYOTA SATTELITE SERVICE Plate phone: (360) 733-7318 7029 212TH AVENUE SOUTHWEST fax: (360) 733-7418 J EbMONDS, WASHINGTON 2 Moist. N/DCP Depth Tests % BbNat4r Sample Elev. Ft. uscs Soil Description I TP-3 li-10-991 11.2 5.9 5 — ........ ...... i Sp. Sm brown poorly graded SAND with silt and grave medium dense, moist iron oxide staining to 2.5 feet becomes gray and dense Test pit terminated at 6 feet below existing grade. No groundwater observed during excavation. 10- 15- 20 Moist. N/DCP Depth Tests % BbAsw Sample Elev. Ft. uscs Soil Description I TP-4 11-10-99� 15.5 5.8 .5 . SM gray silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist SP gray poorly graded SAND with gravel, dense, ......... moist 7.9 ................ Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade. — No groundwater was observed during excavation. 10- 15- 20— GEOTEST SERVICES, INC. 741 Marine Drive Bellingham, WA 98225 phone: (360) 733-7318 fax: (360) 733-7418 Date: 12-3-99 1 By: DSL I Scale: NONE TEST PIT LOGS MAGIC TOYOTA SATTELITE SERVICE 7029 212TH AVENUE SOUTHWEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Project G9316 Plate 3 Moist. N/DCP Depth Tests % BbW4� Sample Elev. Ft. uscs Soil Descriotion I TP- -1 li-109-99 11.5 sm FILL: gray silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist tree roots at 3 feet SP- brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, 5— SM medium dense, moist Test pit terminated at 5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater observed during excavation. 10- 15- 20— Moist. N/DCP Depth Tests % Bbw4r Sample Elev. Ft. uscs Soil Description � TP-6 11-10-991 9.1 SM FILL: gray silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist metal debris 324.2 -xxxxxxx) PT PEAT: soft, saturated IXXXXXXX wood debris 246.2 XXXXXXXI LXXXXXXX b.9 10 ...... ...... SP gray poorly graded SAND, dense, moist Test pit terminated at 10 feet below existing grade. No groundwater was observed during excavation. 20- 9 Date: 12-3-99 By: DSL Scale: NONE Project GEOTEST SERVICESr INC. TEST PIT LOGS G9316 741 Marine Drive Bellingham, WA .98225 MAGIC TOYOTA SATTELITE SERVICE Plate phone: (360) 733-7318 7029212THAVENUE SOUTHWEST fax: (360) 733-7418 4 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON GRAIN -SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE ' 9 8 7 6 5 (L 41 31 2 1 NUNN Iliuillm I, lull Grain diameter (mm) Coarse Fine Coarse I Medium Fine Fines GRAVEL SAND CLAY AND SILT D1 I LINE SYMBOL TEST PIT NUMBER SAMPLE NUMBER DEPTH IN FEET CLASSIFICATION UNIFIED SOIL CLASS LL PI MOIST % TP-1 1 SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL Sm - - 10.7 a TP-1 8 POORLY GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL SP - - 10.2 o____0 TP-3 1 POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL SP-SM - - 11.2 GEOTEST SERVICES, INC. Date: 12-2-99 1 By: DSL I Project 741 Madne Drive GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS G9316 Bellingham, WA 98225 MAGIC TOYOTA SATTELITE SERVICE Plate phone: (360) 733-7318 7029 212TH AVENUE SOUTHWEST fax: (360) 733-7418 11 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON I . . 5 Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Fines GRAVEL SAND CLAY AND SILT LINE SYMBOL TEST PIT NUMBER SAMPLE NUMBER DEPTH IN FEET CLASSIFICATION UNIFIED SOIL CLASS LL P1 MOIST % 0 ---- 0 TP-3 TP-4 5 7 POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT ANDGRAVEL POORLY GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL SP-SM SIP 5.9 7.9 GIEOTEST SERVICES, IN C. 741 Marine Drive Bellingham, WA. 98225 phone: (360) 733-7318 fax: (360) 733-7418 Project G9316 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS MAGIC TOYOTA SATTELITE SERVICE 7029 212TH AVENUE SOUTHWEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON City of Edmonds Permit No: RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: 0 ST A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: B. Me of Work (be specific): MPC611c. C. Contractor: 1- 4 CY (- 0 IV 5 Vt "t Of, 7 V�&) Contact:__�!a)"F AailingAddress: 1A 3 N' Phone: 4/Z-5- _72V 42.19'5 StateLicense#: 411L CtIC- J ;'/ Q Liability Insurance*:- Bond:$ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Z/ Side Sewer Permit.# (if applicable): E. Commercial F] Subdivision 0 City Project EJ EUC (PUD, GTE, PSE, CHAMBERS, OVWD) Multi -Family Single Family F] Other INSPECTOR- F. PAVEMENT: J?rVES f-I NO G. SIZE OF CUT x A 0 H. Chiirge: $ CONCRETE CUT: YES NO olds the City of Edmonds hidFmlg��Jrom injuhes, IDEMNITY.- Applicant understands by his/her signature to this applic-6tion, elshe damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unfori?seen, that may be made against the City of -Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense 6f any legal proceedings including def ynse costs and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEARFOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATIO10FEES WILL BEIIELD UNTIL THE FINALSTREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO TjIE APPLICANT. + Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by, the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. + Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday - NO EXCEPTIONS. + Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. IRAVEREAD THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTANDTHE PERMIT REQUIREMENT"V AND ACKNOWLEDGE THA T I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT A VAILABLE ON SITE A T ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS te. '�r 5 Signature: Da (Contractor'or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY Approved bv: A_t,45, Right-of-wayFee::10 + 6"e4 I time Authori zed: Void After -24 20491 Disruption Fee/Fund 111: S'06cialConditions: 1ASIX4 1JT1LXrtgt"510' Restoratio F e: -v e 6�;Ilc 014M,5+05- Total Fee 15,01) *,4- vop- r"Wm I oA f-SeFAL %)AW4 Recei t No: S- 4 p Issued by: AA UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK. CYffl&MRJJ INSP&T'OR'S SIGNATURE DATE: For inspection requirements see Engineering Information Handout. --NO WORK SUIALI., BEGIN PRIOR TO PERNUT ISSUANCE I exp CITY'OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER PERMIT 1890 9 FiERMIT N _0 9188 Address of Construction: 7 0 29 CQO n-0-2, - VT, Q � L�As ��Ss Property Legal Description (include all easements): ev W A LG � LW L>l W E� I I 1- 0 L4 -7?/ c�k LW 25rw Owner and/or Contractor: State License No. C_ C 0 C-4 Building Permit No. a Q0 �22 �7 0 Single Family 0 Multi -Family (No. of Units—) P�__Commercial Public 12 Invasion into City Right -of -Way: 13 No El, Yes V RW Construction Permit No. I , , v1A OAL.I_ :.T INr Cross other Private Property: 11 No 0 Yet__ELI.� , 6, Attach legal description and copy of recorded 6—a'�iei I �ert(i�� tPat I have read and shall comply with all city requirements Xted on the back of the Permit Card. ell I Date III * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424�-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION* ONLY FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-3202-, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Permi t Fee: Issued By .Trunk Cha�ge:_ Date Issued: C) Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: 0 z_ i( Lid No.: Partial Inspection: d4ps,-fa 9ftit, flia 14 eft2r �Irxm. su"Ag- 4 Date Initia,9 CAmen'ts Reason Rejected: Date —Initial — Final Inspection Approved: Date I n i t i a I PERMIT MUST BEPOSTED ON JOB SITE White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3!90 The City of Edmonds OWNEP. ..................................... ................ JOB ADDRESS 70,41 ........ 2 . ..... .... ... pWW.0001-Ii/75 (REV.11/78) Side Sewer Drawing NE W CONSTRUCTION Rf EASEMENTNO . ...................... ........ REPAIRS D LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NC) . ... ..... ........ CONTRACTOR .... W--J.(P�K .... ....... PERMI-I . N (.) � 0 it, OCK NO - ---------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ..... .... ........................... ...................... ............................................... I ........... ....................... .............................. % " Approved: DATE lj?lk;� ------------------------ .... By ............................... ...... F -. A.) C- 10KY00 V CATCH BASIN 1� aT P R 0 p a.5" -�NDSCAPE PLAN/SITE PLA.� A SCALE. l'-20"-O' i HILD-1 123 LEGEND QTY SYMBOL LATIN NAME COMMONNAME SIZE SPACING 2 ACER PLANANOIDES CRIMSON SENTRY MAPLE 1 5/4' lEA ON ENTRY 8 0 CARPINUS CAROLINIANA AMERICAN HERNBEAM 1 1/2" 4 GROUPINGS OF 2. 18-20' O.C. 5 0 LIQUIDAMBER WORPLESDON SWEETGUM 1 1/2' 25, O.C. STYRACIFLUA 1 PICEA OMORICA SERBIAN SPRUCE 61 2 51 O.C. 3 CUPRESSOCYPARIS LEYLANDCYPRESS 15, O.C. LEYLANDII 2 ACER CIRCINATUM VINE MAPLE! 81 68 CORNUS BAILEY RED TWIG DOGWOOD 18*-24' 6' O.C. ALTERNATE COLORS CORNUS SERICEA YELLOW TWIG DOGWOOD 18 > RHODODENDRON ROSEUM ELEGANS 24' 6' O.C. GROUPING. 1 EA. BETWEEN HERNBEAM 24 El THUJA OCCIDENTALIS EMERALD GREEN 61 61 O.C. ARBORVITAE 20 0 EUONOMUS ALATA COMPACTA 15 (D VIBURNUM DAVIDI DAVIDI VIBURNUM 2 GAL. 3' O.C. 5 GROUPINGS BETWEEN SWEETGUM 42 00 0 COTTON EASTER BEARBERM COTTON 1 GAL, SPACE PLANTS 0 MAX. OF 18' APART DAMMERI EASTER ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA URSI (GROUND COVER) LANDSCAPE NQTES: 1. ALL TREES TO BE STAKED W/ TREATED LODGEPOLE PINE TREE STAKES (2) PER TREF: & TIED W/ HEAVY DUTY CHAINLOCK TREE TIE. 2. 6' MIN. MANUFACTURED TOPSOIL IN ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. 3. LAWN AREA SOD ONLY. STAGGERED SEAMS 4. 2' MIN. PINE GRADE BARK MULCH IN ALL PLANTED AREAS. 5. GROUND COVER TO BE USED IN ALL PLANTED AREAS 24'O.C. 6. LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL PLANT COUNTS. 7. SEE SHEET A-1.2 FOR IRRIGATION PLAN. HEIQHT CALCULATIONS A-209 A-109 B-208 B-108 C-208.5 C-108.5 D-217.5 D-117.5 843/4-210.75 443/4-110.75 DATUM POINT 100 CATCH BASIN AT ROAD HEIGHT LIMIT IS 35' -110.75#35-145.75' PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR -210+28' ACTUAL HEIGHT-238 238 ACTUAL HEIGHT -, 245.75 ALLOWED THEREFORE OKAY 138 CALCULATED HEIGHT 145.75 ALLOWED THEREFORE OKAY LANDSC6PE CALCULATIONS SITE AREA - 54.617 SF 7Y- OF SITE AREA - 3.823 SF REQUIRED TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED -8,166 SF (15%) PROPOSED IS 15Y. WHICH IS GREATER THAN REQUIRED 7 X THEREFOREOKAY CARLEM ARCHITECTS P.S. zmhk=tur(m plann�rg 2204 Riverside Drive Suite 270 Mount Vernon, WA 98273. Phone: 5601 424-0594 Fax: R60) 424-5726 A NEW SERVICE FACILITY FOR: MAGIC TOYOTA 7029 212TH AVE: S.E., EDMONDS, WA. FRZ E. c 1-1 1 V E D J U L 11 2000 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS FILE 9 9 - 1 0 0 PROJECTNUMbER: REVISIONS., 07/07/00 PER PLANNING COMMENTS SHEET TITLE! LANDSCAPE PLAN/SITE PLAN RUSTYNOBLE PROJECT ARCHITECT. A RUSTY NOBLE WPROVEL) By PLANNING DRAWN, BY, PETERCARLETTI CHECKED BY, 3/17/00 ,DATE D..\ARCH\99\100\Al.O COMPUTER PILE NAME COPYRIGHT 11000 CARLeTTI ARCHITeCTS.' P.S. J CA F1LE NO. 2_8 4-, Critical Areas Checklist ----------------- --------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1 . Site Address/Location: -7 QI I I I 4� Sb SW 2. Property Tax Account Number: 56� I oo(, w4 _wWo& 00& 005 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? X yes; _ no. If yes; how is site developed? aj�T� ".&IWAW 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 1 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 3 3 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 3 ) 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standina water: Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain-_ of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? 0- Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? 10. Site is primarily: forested >,'� _; meadow shrubs mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetla nd is present on site: DETIP.MINATION CONDITIONAL W IVER Date Ica—chk.doc; Rev 10/03/97 I J City of Edmonds NJWV CRITICAL AREAS CHEC K*LIST I The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential 6itical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to -complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent infor mation (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: 9W 1�'0284's Name '� I �00 flfa6x, Street Address city State Zip 415 -7-7 5 - 44 v2, Telephone Signature Date Applicant Representative: WA 4ik� P-5, Name '�2,04_ Street Address MP'Uh � 6 a, city State Zip Date c:reception\jana\cac1.doc (over) CAFILEN0. qg-ZO-7 Critical Areas Checklist ----------------- -------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: -7 QI Sb 5 VV 2. Property Tax Account Number: 5(o(p oo( *Am 5(46100& cc4 *-w& 005 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? X yes; _ no. if yes; how is site developed? a[tT� rarzia&f-, 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: V Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: W19 Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flow's are seasonal? (What time of year? 10. Site is primarily: forested _; meadow shrubs mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) X 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: bV DETDkMINATION %a_�chk.dGc; Rev 10/03/97 City of Edmonds CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Applicatio ' n for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submitt,al of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, 'or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critic4l Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). C� r-'9 0. v 1 2 --J lu�jjj An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent infor m-ation (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: 9T'11J �*-0384's Name 2-1 �'00 FA � WA, Street Address City State Zip +�5 Telephone Signature llb4lff Date Applicant Representative: WA �-5 . Nelev 64�4' Name ��2,04 RiYe,.6;Jt 1-117 Street Address MOU4 6M ' 1* City State Zip 111�4 0 Date cxcception�ana\cacf.doc (over) I.-? - 9,z� c. is November 25, 1998 David Broadus 21300 Highway 99 Edmonds, WA 98026 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works a Planning/Building a Parks and Recreation - Engineering - Wastewater Treatment Plant Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist # 98-286 & 98-287 Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records. IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO BE NOTED: PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY, The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a project -specific determination. You must submit a copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications Any other development permit applications. Enc: Critical Areas Determination * Architectural Design Board C:Recept!onUana\CRLTR.doc Thank you. Sharla Graham Planning Secretary 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan "'o C. 18 9'*,) May 11, 2000 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 -.FAX (425) 771-0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering Mr. Nikolai Bossoff, P.E. D'Amato Conversano, Inc. 2821 Northup Way, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 08004 SUBJECT: Proposed Service Facifily for Magic Toyota at,7029-21", "� Stioet: S (ADB-99-243) (PC 00-152) Dear Mr. Bossoff, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The Engineering Division reviewed your civil site design. The review team notes the following revisions/corrections. Please contact. the review team members directly for questions regarding their comments. Sjorm Drainag-e- — Don Fiene. Assistant QU-Enei:neer at (42�) 771-0220. Ext. 323 • Provide revisions for water quality amendments in the enclosed storm drainage study. • Provide a sediment trap, as more than one acre is proposed to be disturbed. • Rewrite note 6 on Construction Sequence; refer to notes I and 2 of ESC Notes which address this issue. • it appears that a bioswale could be provided east of the entry panhandle. • Provide a profile of the storm system. Show all utili ty crossings. Lraffic — Maaanne Zukowski Traffic Engi�n.eer at (425) 771-0220, Ext. 32 • The minimum size parking space is 16'-6" x 8'-6". A 16'-6" x 8'-6" rectangle must fit inside proposed angled parking spaces.- • The high traffic load driveway detail must be amended to reflect the new standard radius of 20 feet. Utilities — Jim Waite. WaterlSewer Supervisor at (42�) 771-0235. Ext. 649 • The dumpster area must be covered so that the storm drains that are directed to the sanitary sewer system are not impacted by rainwater. • Coordinate design and location of the dumpster/recycle area with the Recycling Coordinator, Steve Fisher, at (42.5) 771-0235, Ext. 603. • Use the City of Edmonds standard detail for double detector check valve assembly.. • The new domestic meter will require a tap by City of Edmonds Public Works crews. • The double detector check valve vault must be located as close as possible to the property line. • Maintain a minimum of 36' clear radius from center of fire hydrant.to any obstruction. Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan Nikolai Bossoff, P.E. D'Arnato Conversano, Inc. May 11, 2000 Page 2 When the revisions are complete, please return the attached redlined plans and report together with four sets* of revised plans and two drainage reports for additional review. It will be necessary to.provide a construction cost estimate for City staff to determine the Engineering Division fees and construction bonding amount. If you have any other questions, do not hesitate to contact Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer, at 425-771-0220. Sincerely, DON FIENE, P.E. Assistant City Engineer DF/GCH/cmc Enclosure c: DSC Peter Carletti; Carletti Architects, P.S.; 2204 Riverside Drive, Suite 270; Mount Vernon, WA 98273 RAENGR\G0RDY\9243.D0C Q -Z The City of Edmonds Water Service Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS 0 LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . .................. OWNER ....:TQydA-Q . ......................................................................... CONTRACTOR .................................................................................... PERMIT NO. -4M JOB ADDRESS ........................... . ....................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT, NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . .................................... 3 PWW-0001 rl NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). FROM-: GEQ/EDGE �4- PHONE NO. : 360 733 7416 Jun. 02 2000 11:35AM P2 GED F0CX_ SIRMISAL. Engineers, Geologists and WA60 Special Inspectors 741 marine Drive - BeLtingharn. WA 98225 - Phone 360.733.7318 - Fax 360,733.7418 - e.mait geotest@nas.com June 2, 2000 Job No. G9316 Magic -Toyota 21300 Highway 99 Edmonds, Washington 98026 Attention: David Broadus Subject: Plan Review Magic Toyota Satellite Service 7029 212th Avenue Southwest Edmonds, Washington. Reference: Geotechnical Engineering Study Magic Toyota Satellite Service 7029 2121 Avenue Southwest Edmonds, Washington Dated December-5,1999 By GeoTest Services, job no. (39316 Dear Mr. Broadus: D 6 r)':VELOP1v4-EiqT sc:RVICES CTR CITy OF X ' _DMONDS As requested by the City of Edmonds, we have reviewed the rockery section by Carletti Architects and our slab on grade recommendations in the referenced report. The City of Edmonds indicated that the recommendations for a few inches of sand on top of the vapor barrier should actually be for 4 inches of trimmable, compactible fill in accordance with ACI 302.1. In our opinion, this change is noted and should provide the same function as the sand for aid in curing of the concrete slab. We also understand that a rockery is proposed for the project. The maximum height of the rockery is to be about 8 feet and it will be facing a cut slope on the east side of the project. Rockeries are not intended to be used as retaining walls in the sense that a cast -in -place concrete wall is a retaining wall. The primary purpose of a ro * ckery is to protect exposed soil surfaces from erosion. Rockeries are intended to be constructed against soils that would stand near vertical without protection. Rockeries should be constructed in general accordance with Association of Rockery Contractors' (ARC) Guidelines. A typical detail is provided on Figure 1. Page I of 2 FROM GEO/EDGE PHONE NO. : 360-733 741d Jun. 02 2000 11:35AM P3 GeoTest Services, Inc. Magic Toyota Satellite Service. Edmonds, WA June 2, 2000 Project G9316 As rockery construction is highly dependent on contractor skill and ability and not.entirely controllable through engineering methods, GeoTest Services should be requested to observe rockery construction during placement. We are pleased to have been of service to you during the design phase of this project. If you have any questions regarding this reWrt or other services we offer, please call. 94' 0"'M Sincerely, S GeoTest Services, Inc. A Z. We Douglas S. Lynne, P.E. 1EXPR-ES 2 , Geotechnical Services Manager al Rockery Section attachments. Figure 1 Typic cc: Carletti Architects, Attn: Peter Carletti Page 2 of 2 -6440� &4� 19224%&� TI.-= 1-410C T" FROM :,GEO/EDGE ,01= i Ir PHONE NO. : 360 733 7418 Jun. 02 2000 11:36AM P4 Optional Topsoil or other material layer (12" Thick Maximum) H 6V I 1 9 1 11 1 1 1[— Competent Native Soil Drainage Layer 18" Minimum (12" Minimum Width) Keyway ComDetent ----------------- Native Soil 4" rigid, perforated PCV F (ie 5 man) drain pipe NOTES: Maximum Height: 8 feet Rocks should be angular, competent and free of defects. Drainage layer should consist of 2" to 6" crushed rock or quarry spall. Drainpipe should be placed with enough gradient to initiate flow and tightlined to a suitable discharge point or facility. Perforations should be oriented down. Rock Sizes: 1 man: 50-200 pound rock 2 man: 200-700 pound rock 3 man: 700-2000 pound rock 4 man: 2000-4000 pound rock 5 man: 4000-6000 pound rock 6 man: 6000-8000 pound.rock GeoTest Services representative should be requested to observe soil conditions during construction to confirm conditions are as anticipated. GEOTEST SERVICES, INC. 741 Marine Drive Bellingham. WA 98225 phone: (360) 733-7318 fax: (360) 733-7418 Date: 6-2-00 1 Sr. DSL I Scale: NONE TYPICAL ROCKERY SECTION MAGic TOYOTA SATELLrrF-: SERVICE 7029 212T" AVENUE SOUTHWEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Project I Figure 09316 A TOP OF WALL TnD nC' MAI i WL lc� 0 -13 0 ��;;h 0 0 z 0 0 TOP OF WALL ELEV.=21 0.5' TOP OF WALL ELEV.=216.1' CONCRETE WALL �F_A_ A TOP OF WALL ELEV.=217.2' TOP OF WALL-, ELEV.=210.6' TOP OF WALL ELEV.=203.1' VX 1' DRAIN (PLUGGED) ROCKERY-1, 0 0 0 2 0 !0 Jb! 14�2,,,32 INDEX MAP —RECOVERED RECOVERE REBAR & CAP REBAR AMPED "4561 RMA" & =1 STAMPED "4561 RMA" IRON PIPE FIR (BENT) 36 IN 4 DIA SECTION 20, TWP.27 N., RGE.4 E., W.M. 7�. N 3 DIA TELEPHONE NL PEDESTAL 2 6 ECOVERED 5/8" IRON PIPE 6 P E 5 L' r DE EC STA V 8 �' I E R w W PLU nu MP03,41 2.52 4, e�b I$ 4pW/ PLUG & TACK 4. c. .3 C&w 9 01 IL; tj "=6 RIM=199.50 AS —BUILT IE(NW)=l 97.41�.Vg"PLASTIC) CENTERLINE p r. I IE(S)=l 97.33(8"CONC. R "�K Rrl n - - *21'44" E -L=2UU,zVl F-L;--2UI- E --Ptj L E7317— — 4 SS (zq 7U F4_F_I_0W_ it SD................................ NORTH NUT ELEVATION=201.51' 0 T m z FF1 BASIS OF BEARING VOLUME 19 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 63 RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY AS SHOWN HEREON BEARING NORTH 89*21'44" EAST. VERTICALDAT M ASSUMED PROJECT ENCHMARK NORTH NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT ACROSS FROM PROJECT SITE. NORTH NUT ELEVATION = 201.51' LEGEND 0 SURVEY MARKER RECOVERED AS NOTED EB WATER METER N WATER VALVE WATER BLOW —OFF VALVE POWER POLE WITH GUY ANCHOR 0 CATCH BASIN @ STORM SEWER MANHOLE —0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE n TRAFFIC SIGN OHP — OVERHEAD POWER LINE ss— SANITARY SEWER LINE SD — STORM DRAIN SEWER LINE LEGAL DE-SCRIPTION LOTS 4 AND 5, BLOCK 6 PLAT OF SEATTLE HEIGHTS DIVISION NO. 4, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 4 AND 5. 72 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH THE LINE BETWEEN SAID LOTS 4 AND 5, 170 FEET; THENCE EAST TO EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO A POINT 193 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RESEARCH VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE 11 RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY VOL ' UME 19 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 63 RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY CARLEM ARCHITECTS archkeewre A plannEng 2204 Riverside Drive Suite 270 Mount Vernon. WA 98273 Phone: 3601.424-0394 Fax: 360 424-5726 611 9 El R E A Nt:VV 51tNVICE FACILITY FOR: MAGIC TOYOTA 7029 212TH AVE: S.E. EDMONDS, WA. UNDERGIR UND ILITY mnTE UNDER-OROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED . UPON SURFACE INDICATOR& NO UNDERGROUND"'— LOCAT� SERVICE WAS UTILIZED FOR THEIR 99-100' LOCATION. THE Urv'-'E OF THIS MAP FOR THEIR EXACT LOCATION IS NOT PNOitu I 114UMDEM: WARRANTED. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION USER SHOULD CALL THE UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE AT 1-800-424-5555 48 HOI,JRS,BEFORE . CONSTRUCTION. REVISIONS: LOTIaL 1.) SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENT SEARCH FOR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, OWNERSHIP TITLE EVIDENCE OR ANY OTHER FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TITLE SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE. 2.) THIS MAP IS A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AS A PROPERTY SURVEY. THE PROPERTY LINES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON A COMPLETE PROPERTY SURVEY IN COMPLIANCE WITH R.C.W. 58.09. 3.) PROPERTY LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON VOLUME 19 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 63 RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. SHEET TITLE: EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE SURVEY ss— Ss— SS - SS SS SS ItQ.7 N SS Ll RIM=199.51 IE(N)=195.56(8"CONC.) IE(W)=195.46(12"CONC.) /EDGEOF ASPHALT MH (TYPICAL) 0 98 40-(8"CONC.) . ....... ...... .... ... GAS VALVE---�_�Si EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE SURVEY SCALE: l'-20'-O' RUSTY NOBLE PROJECT ARCHITECT, .�RUSTY NOBLE DRAWN BY, PETER CARLETTI CHECKED BY, 3/17/00 DATE! D:\ARCH\99\100\Al.Ol COMPUTER PILE NAME A =rz 0 COPYRIGHT 1009 CARLr_TTI ARCHITECTS, P,S.