The URL can be used to link to this page

71 MAIN ST^� �' l IIII�lIII 7 1 ' l /A.icAj JT FIRE PREVENTION r Serving B, ., .,g�_...zottds; and 124?5 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT SNOHOMIaH_CQ. ❑ EDMONDS Mountlake Terrace IRE Everett, WA 98208 ❑ BRIER Phone (4 25) 551-1200 ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ISTLARI T ❑UNINCORPORATED wwwFireDistrict].org Fax (425) 551-1272 FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT LOCATION: 71 Main Street 98020 Annual 17-A I BUSINESS NAME: Edmonds Ferry Dock & Pass Terminal PHONE: 4257120228 SCHEDULEDMay 2015 DATE DUE 177 202 MAILING 71 Main Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 UFIR / ADDRESS: OlWell, Phil BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: EMERGENCY-1, WA State DOT HOME PHONE: 4257120228 CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO BUSINESS EMAIL: LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: ai 4 , HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS 1 dV f"r 'IF 2 2 - 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: - 0 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON .. CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: I INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 4 18 4 8 DATE: DISPOSITION: LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES .Q NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY ,yi CINTA6 Confidence Test Report 1002 CENTRAL AVE NORTH KENT WA 98032 JUL 0 3 C014 PHONE: 253-852-1962 FAX:253-852-2049 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM (One System per Report) Certification Given RED ❑ YELLOW ❑ 1 WHITE ❑X CONFIDENCE TEST 0 REPAIRS ❑ Sprinkler Monitoring Panel?' Occupancy Address: 71 main st Edmonds wa. Responsible Person First & Last Name: Steve Murdock Responsible Person Address, City, State, Zip: Date of Inspection: 6-17-14 Testers Name (Please Print): Justin HUffineS Identification Number: 75770395 Central station monitoring? Yes 1z No ❑ Monitoring Required? Yes 0 No ❑ System Make: Radionics Occupancy Name: Ed1716'1dS ferry dock Phone Number: 206-515-3696 Responsible Party/ E—Mail Address Inspection Quarterly ❑ Frequency/Type: Annual Nicet Number: - 117503 System Location Electrical room by bathroom Monitoring Company Name: Guardian Security System Model: D9024 FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Nicet Certification Number: - This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Department Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: f J Phone # 253-852-1962 LV Building Representative (signature) 71 main st Edmonds wa. Fire Alarm Systems Page 1 of 2 0 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. Alarm Svstem Functionali 1. Trouble signal with AC power off? Yes L No ❑ 2. System operates properly on battery backup? Yes 9 No ❑ 3. Battery voltage (no load) 26.2 volts 4. Battery voltage (full load) 25.9 volts (signals operating) 5. Charge circuit voltage 26.9 volts 6. System operates properly on standby power? Yes 0 No ❑ 7. All signals operate on AC power? Yes x❑ No ❑ 8. Number of initiating circuits Addressable 9. Number of signal circuits 2 10. Does alarm system meet audibility standards as accepted? Yes X No 11. All circuits checked for electrical supervision? Yes X No 12. All auxiliary equipment operates (Elevators, fans, dampers)? N/A X Yes No 13. Ventilation controls operate? N/A X Yes No 14. Key to panel available? N/A Yes'X No' 15. Materials and equipment needed to restore pull stations are available at the N/A Yes X No main panel, e.g. glass rods, and plates; keys and alien wrenches, etc? 16. Operating instructions at panel? Yes X No 17. Trouble indicators function properly? Yes X No 18. Remote Annunciator Panels function properly? N/A Yes X No 19. Elevator Call Down functions properly? N/A X Yes No 20. Test record posted at panel? Yes X No 21. General alarm automatic time delay (minutes) N/A ❑X 22. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring company? N/A Yes No 23. Other Devices (Specify) Yes No X System Devices Total Number of Units in Building Total Number Units Tested Test Results Acceptable 24. Bells, Horns, Chimes 24 24 N/A _ Yes X No 25. Voice Speakers (Voice Clarity) N/A X Yes No � 26. Visual Alarm Devices 24 24 N/A Yes X No 1 27. Smoke Detectors 48 48 N/A 1 Yes XI No 28. Heat Detectors 2 2 N/A _ Yes X No _ 29. Duct Detectors N/A X Yes No - 30. Sprinkler Flow Switches - 1 - -1-- ---N/A-- - -Yes-X-- -No 31. Sprinkler Supervisory Switches 3 3 N/A Yes X No 32. Manual Pull Stations 2 2 N/A Yes X No 33. Annunciator(s) 1 N/A Yes X No 34. Beam Detectors N/A X Yes No 35. Automatic Door Unlocks N/A X Yes No 36. Automatic Door Release N/A 'X Yes No 37. Fire Dampers N/A Yes No Communication Equipment Total Number of Units in Buildinq Total Number Units Tested Test Results Acceptable 38. Phone Sets N/A X Yes No - 39. Phone Jacks N/A X Yes No 40. Call -in Signal N/A X Yes No _I Fire Alarm Systems Page 2 of 2 a IREE F R ©T E C T i 0 N nwwmmwi.� i Confidence Test Report 1002 CENTRAL AVE NORTH KENT WA 98032 JUL 0 3 2014 PHONE: 253-852-1962 FAX: 253-852-2049 SPRINKLER — DRY SYSTEM Certification Given (One System per Report) RED YELLOW WHITE X CONFIDENCE TEST X REPAIRS Occupancy Address- 71 main st Edmonds wa. Occupancy Name: Edmonds ferry dock Responsible Person First & Last Name: Steve Murdock Phone Number: 206-515-3696 Responsible Person Address, City, State, Zip: - Responsible Party E=Mail Address - Date of Inspection: 6-17-14 Testers Name (Please Print): Justin Huff irles Identification Number Inspection Annual 0 Frequency/Type ❑ Nicet Certification Number: 117503 (Required): )� (Re System Location: Electrical room by bathrooms Central station monitoring? Yes QX No Monitoring Required? YesNo❑ Monitoring Company Name: Gaurdian System Make.- 2.5"CSC System Model: AF SEATTLE FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Nicet Certification Number: This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: (�,n ,� Phone # 253-852-1962 Building Representative (signature) 71 main st Edmonds wa. Sprinklers - Dry Page 1 of 2 i The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General 1. Trip test conducted? Yes 0 No ❑ 2. System tripped in 13 seconds. Trip point 21 Time to inspectors test Dry 3. Main Drain and Inspector's Drain flow test conducted? Yes No ❑ 4. Static pressure: 125 psi Flow pressure: 110 psi 5. Number of Sprinkler Heads? 100+ 6. 2-inch drain? Other ❑ Yes No❑ 7. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes a No ❑ 8. Alarm bell operates? N/A ❑ Yes No❑ 9. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes or less? Yes 0 No ❑ 10. Heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge systems? N/A Yes ❑ No ❑ 11. System inspected and lubricated? Yes X No ❑ 12. Valves are sealed or supervised? YesjXj No 13. Signs are provided on valves? Yes FX] No 14. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed and turn freely? YesF No ❑ 15. Sprinkler heads replaced or successfully sample tested in last 10 years? Yes No ❑ Date of last test: 2011 16. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable? YesQ No ❑ 17. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrench for each? Yes No ❑ 18. System left in service? Yes 0 No ❑ 19. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5 years? 2012 YesQ No Year changed: 20. Sprinkler heads free of corrosion, paint, obstructions and/or physical damage? Yes No ❑ 21. System drained and restored to normal operation? Yes No[-1 22. Was debris found in the Fire Department Connection (FDC)? Yes❑ No a 23. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed in the last 5 years? 2012 Yesm No 0 Date of last back flush 24. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring company?. N/A ❑ Ye' No ❑ 25. Is the hydraulic nameplate installed and visible on riser, if No then Yellow Tag. Yes ❑ No ❑i� (Ref: NFPA 25 5.2.7) 26. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Date YesQ No ❑ Performed 2012 71 main st Edmonds wa. Sprinklers - Dry Page 2 of 2 SNOHOMISH CC FIRE DIST Serving Brier; Edmonds, and Mountla" Terrace '"7ww Fir eDistrictl. org LOCATION: 71 Main Street 98020 BUSINESS NAME: Edmonds Fet ry Dock & Pass Terminal MAILING ADDRESS: 71 Main Street. Edmonds, WA 98020 12425 Meridian Ave S Everett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 551-1200 Fax (425) 551-1272 PHONE: 4257120228 FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT ZfEDMONDS ❑ BRIER ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ❑ UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY I STATION & SHIFT Annual 17-D SCHEDULEPI3 �1�1 DATE DUE l • �i 2 UFIR /7 / 202 BUSINESS OWNER: OlWell, Phil HOME PHONE: EMERGENCY-1:-�'A4kState DOT HOME PHONE: 4257120226 CURRENT KEACCESS 2: HOME PHONE: CITY YES N❑O BUSINESS EMAIL: LICENSE INITIAL INSPECTION DATE ' PERSON CONTACTED: NAME OF INSPECTOR:( FIRE SYSTEMS: AS, 5/1:3 FA 5/13 FE 5/13 FD Lk Box HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS 1 1 2 4 2 3 �'- 3 4 14 5 5 � r I 6 6 K 7_ 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION _E: DATE DU EXTENS ON GRANTEDTO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITE: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: - f 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: - INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 n • "� ^ VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: - 4 2. 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 5 4 8 4 $ DATE: DISPOSITION: 7 LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY FIRE PREVENTION -Serving Brier, -Edmonds 12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT SNOHOMISH CO:.` Mountlake Terrace,and FIR� Everett, WA 98208 ❑ EDMONDS ❑BRIER the Town of WoodvGay' DIST Phone (425) 551-1200 ❑ wOODWAY ❑ AKE TERRACE wwwFireDistrictl.oYg Fax (425) 551-1272 UNINCORPORATED ❑UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT LOCATION: � 71 Main St 366 17 C BUSINESS NAME: Edmunds Ferry Dock & Pass Terminal PHONE: 4257120228 SCHEDULED DATE DUE ► n / . r 3 MAILING ADDRESS: 71 Main St UFIR / 177 S 25� Edmonds 98020 BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: 4.257120228 ' A State DOT EMERGENCY-1: Fax# 206-587-5686 HOME PHONE: 2065152392 CURRENT YES NO KEY ACCESS-2: Dock Agent HOME PHONE: �257120228 CITY BUSINESS 1:1 EL LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: FIRE A & AS D Lk /12 FE'5r 1 gvgTFMq• 51I-h 5-W4 ANNUAL V HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS 2 ,/ 2 3 �' 3 4 I 4 r \ 5 5 6 0 6 Aa !` 7', 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X �. 1st RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION FINAL RE -INSPECTION , EXTENSION VIOLATIONS DATE DUE. DATE DUE. t i,°'' GRANTED TO' ' DATE DUE: CITED PERSON PERSON PERSON CONTACTED: -' +, CONTACTED: CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS PRE -CITATION CITATION ISSUED 1 5 4 1 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER: 4 ' CODE 5 2 6 '. 2 6 � DATE: SECTION: RETURN RECEIPT 3 7 3 7 RECEIVED 5 14 DISPOSITION: 8 4 i 8 DATE: LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO 5 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY Confidence Test Report 1002 CENTRAL AVE NORTH KENT WA 98032 PHONE: 253-852-1962 FAX: 253-852-2049 FIRE ALARM, SYSTEM Certification Given (One System per Report) 'RED [:]I YELLOW ❑ I WHITE i❑ CONFIDENCE TEST 0 I REPAIRS ❑ Sprinkler Monitoring Panel? ❑X Occupancy Address: 71 Main St EdmondS,Wa. Occupancy Name: Edmonds Ferry Dock Responsible Person First & Last Name: Scott Phone Number: 206-515-3696 Responsible Person Responsible Party Address, -City, State, Zip:- - — - -E-Mail-Address -- Date of Inspection: Inspection Quarterly ❑(High-rise only) p 5-24-13 Frequency/Type: Annual ❑i� Testers Name SFD Certification (Please Print): Mary Searcy Number: SCP - S-04343 Identification Number: 75770395 System Location Electrical Room By Bathrooms Central station monitoring? Yes Z No El Monitoring Guardian Security Monitoring Required? Yes FX_1 No ❑ Company Name: System Make: RadIOnICS System Model: D9024 SEATTLE FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Found FACP batteries outdated Found strobes are not syncronized CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: 5-13-13 Corrected By: Mary Searcy (if additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) SFD Certification Number: SCP - Replaced FACP batteries This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Seattle Fire Department Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and been orted to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: Phone # 425-495-0612 Building Representative (signature) 71 Main St Edmonds,Wa. Fire Alarm Systems Page 1 of 2 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Seattle Fire Department Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. Alarm System Functionality Yes x No ❑ 1. Trouble signal with AC power off? Yes O No ❑ 2 operates properly. on battery backup? ;:. -...System 26.76 3 Batteryvoltage no load)volts 9. (... : 't 2s s2 �;; volts.'(signais`operating) >> 4 `:Battery: voltage; (full load) . . ,..> . 5. Charge circuit voltage 26 77 volts :Yes 0 No ❑. 6; System operates properly on standby power? Yes 0 No El 7. All signals operate on AC power? g p. Addressable"' of initiatingcircuits z 9 Number of signal circuits Yes X ::r ' No. 10 'Does,:alarm system meet audibility standards as.accepted? . . Yes X No it All circuits checked for electrical supervision? ,. (Eleyators,: fans, dampers)? .. N/ A.; X ` - :. Yes..No „ 12 ;All auxiliary. equipment:operates N/A X Yes _ _o � 13. Ventilation controls operate. - :. Yes X_ No 14 Key to. panel available? are available at the N/A Yes X No 15. Materials and equipment needed to restore pull stations main panel, e.g. glass rods, and plates, keys and alien wrenches, etc? _ Ye s Operating instructions at'-pianel? , _ Yes X No 17. Trouble indicators function properly? N/.A., ! Yes X ` No 184 Remote Annunciator Panels function properly? .; _ N/A X 19. Elevator Call Down functions properly? _ Yes X � N° o .... . 20._ Test record posted at panel? - .. N/A l.a 0 minutes 21 General alarm automatic time delay(minutes) r: r .,. compahy. .,. N A Yes X Y, N o 22 Was;a si nal received�at the,CentraLStation monitoring . _ - _ - - Yes No X - _9 23. Other Devices (Specify) Total Number of Total Number S stem Devices Units in Byilding. Units its Test Results Acce table za zd N/q` _ . Yes X No 24 Bells,,Horns, Chimes N/A X Yes No -1 25. Voice Speakers (Voice Clarity) 24 24 N/A Yes X No I ' 26 Visual Alarm Devices i .. ._..... .. . • "48 • 48 N/A I Yes XI No _ 27. Smoke Detectors 2 2 3 N/A -_ Yes, X No .28. Heat Detectors,: N/A X Yes No _ 29. Duct Detectors : 1 N/A Yes X , No 30: Sprinkler Flow-Switcheg 3 3 N/A _ Yes X No 31. Sprinkler Supervisory Switches _ 2 2' N/A . - - Yes X No, ; 32. Manual Pull Stations 1 N/A Yes X No 33. Annunciator(s) :: N /A� X - Yes � No 34: Beam Detectors N/A X Yes No 35. Automatic Door Unlocks ............ .. N/A X Yes No 36. Automatic Door Release N/A X Yes No 37. Fire Dampers Total Number of Units Total Number Units Communication Equipment in Buildin Tested Test Results Acce table N/A X Yes No 38: Phone Sets: N/A X Yes No 39. Phone Jacks 1 1. N/A .- Yes X No . 40.. Call -in Signal . Page 2 of 2 Fire Alarm Systems Confidence Test Report 1002 CENTRAL AVE NORTH KENT WA 98032 PHONE: 253-852-1962 FAX: 253-852-2049 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM Certification Given (One System per Report) RED ❑ YELLOW ❑ T WHITE ❑X CONFIDENCE TEST X❑ REPAIRS ❑ Sprinkler Monitoring Panel? 0 Occupancy Address: Occupancy Name: Edmonds Dock Responsible Person First & Last Name: Scott Phone Number: 206-515-3696 Responsible Person _ Responsible Party - - Address, City "State, Zip: E—Mail Address Date of Inspection: Inspection Quarterly ❑(High-rise Only) 6/25/12 Frequency/Type: Annual ❑X Testers Name SFD Certification 06762 (Please Print): Mickey Hllderbrand Number: SCP— Identification Number: Electrical room near bathrooms System Location Central station monitoring? Yes No ❑ Monitoring G au rd i an Monitoring Required? Yes No ❑ Company Name: System Make: RadlonlCS System Model: D9024 SEATTLE FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Strobes are it of sync CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (if additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) SFD Certification Number: SCP - This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Seattle Fire Department Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective. action. od, Signature of Tester: Phone # Building Representative (signature) 199 Sunset Ave S, Edmonds WA Fire Alarm Systems Page 1 of 2 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Seattle Fire Department Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. Alarm System Functionality I. Trouble signal with AC power off? Yes X Yes No El No [I3. 2. System operates properly on battery backups 26.49 4. Battery voltage (no load) volts Battery voltage (full load) 2s:az volts (signals operatirig)' 5. Charge circuit voltage 26 86 volts Yes;.0 No ❑ 6. System operates properly on standby powers Yes 0 No El8. 7. All signals operate on AC power? Addresible Number of initiating circuit 9. . 10: Number of signal circuits a Does alarm system meet audibility standards as accepted? Yes ❑X No ❑ 11. All circuits checked for electrical supervision? N/A ❑X Yes ❑X Yes ❑ ' No ❑ No ❑ 12. All auxiliary. equipment operates (Elevators, fans, dampers)? 13. Ventilation controls operate? N/A ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ 14..Key to panel_ available N/A ❑ Yes No ❑ 15. Materials and equipment needed to restore pull stations are available at the N/A ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ main panel, e.g. glass rods, and plates, keys and alien wrenches, etc? - . ,:.. Yes' X❑ No ❑ 16. Operating instructions at panel? Yes ❑X No ❑ 17. 18: Trouble indicators function properly? Remote Annunciator: Panels properly? , ; : _ _; ; _ N/A ❑ Yes 0 ., No,❑_ 19. _function Elevator Call Down functions properly? N/A ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ 20..Test record posted at panel? Y es X❑ No❑ 2_2 e atic time delay (minutes) V1/asea signal recelo:d at the Central Station. monitoring company _._;_ _ N/A X❑ ;,:N/A. ❑ Yes QX No ❑ 23. Other Devices (Specify) Yes ❑ No ❑ System Devices Total Number of Units in Building Total Number Units Tested Test Results Acceptable 24: Bells, Horns, Chimes 2a . 24 N/A..L es X❑ . Y_ No 25. Voice Speakers (Voice Clarity). N/A El .. Yes El No ❑ _ .24 26 Visual1. Alarm Devices 24 : , N A: Yes ❑X :: No ❑ . . 27. Smoke Detectors 48 48 N/A El Yes X❑ No ❑ 28:. Heat Detectors 2 2 N/A ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ 29: Duct Detectors __ _ N/A ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ 30; Sprinkler Flow Switches 1 1 - N/A'❑ �.-Yes FX -- No -El 31. Sprinkler Supervisory Switches 1 1 N/A ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ 32. Manual Pull Stations 5 5 N/A ❑; . Yes ❑X No ❑ .. .. 33. Annunciator(s) 1 N/A El Yes ❑X No ❑ 34. Beam Detectors N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No. 0 35. Automatic Door Unlocks N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 36. Automatic Door Release N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 37. Fire Dampers N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Communication Equipment Total Number of Units in Building Total Number Units Tested Test Results Acceptable 38. Phone Sets N/A ETYes ❑ No El 39. Phone Jacks N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 40. Call -in Signal N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Fire Alarm Systems Page 2 of 2 #�`1 xE�4 Q , �rq y: ��f��'t�ti�' 4'I1� e.:'�a ...fk•aiS t m; M SEA' 1.4 2012 Confidence Test Report 1002 CENTRAL AVE NORTH KENT WA 98032 PHONE: 253-852-1962 x° FAX: 253-852-2049 SPRINKLER — DRY SYSTEM Certification Given (One System per Report) RED YELLOW X WHITE CONFIDENCE TEST IN I REPAIRS I El Occupancy Address: 199 Sunset Ave S, Edmonds WA Occupancy Name: Edmonds Dock Responsible Person Scott 206-515-3696 First & Last Name: Phone Number: Responsible, Person Responsible Party Address, City, State, Zip: E—Mail Address Date of Inspection: 6/25/12 Inspection Annual ❑ p Frequency/Type ❑ Testers Name SFD Certification (Please Print): Mickey Hilderbrand Number: SCP-06762 Identification Number Sprinkler room nearbathrooms (Required): System Location: Central station monitoring? Yes 19 No[:] Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes❑x No❑ Company Name: Guardian System Make: CSC System Model: SEATTLE FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) FDC caps missing (2) gauges are due for service Cannot locate low point drain for walkay CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) SFD Certification Number: SCP - This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Seattle Fire Department Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: Phone # Building Representative (signature) 199 Sunset Ave S, Edmonds WA Sprinklers - Dry Page 1 of 2 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Seattle Fire Department Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General Yes No ❑ 1. Trip test conducted? 2. System tripped in .15 seconds : Trip point .17 Tnne.to inspectors test 2 3. Main Drain and Inspector's Drain flow test conducted? Yes El No El 4 : ` Statie pres��0sure ppsi 5._ Number of Sprinkler Heads? Other 'Yes❑ No❑ 6.1 < 2 inch drain? ,� 7. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A Yes 0 No ❑ 8.. Alarm bell'operates?N/A Yes X: No 9. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes or less? Yesz No ❑ 10 Heat actuation devices'tested on pre=action and: deluge systems?, = N/A Q Yes ❑ No ❑ 11. System inspected and lubricated? Yes X No ❑ 12 _ Valves are �sealedor� supervised? Yes x No 13. Signs are provided on valves? Yes x No 14. Pumperconnecti6hs'and claoogr valvesunobstructed and turn freely? ; Yes No ❑ 15. Sprinkler heads replaced or successfully sample tested in last 10 years? Yes No ❑ Date of last test: �,< Yes No ❑ 16 Sprinkler coverage is acceptable .. �� .. 17. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrench for Yes No ❑ each? 18. System left: in service?,.:.,., Yes ❑i� . No ❑ 19. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5 years? Year changed: 2006 Yes❑ No� 23. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed in the last 5 years? Yes 1 No ❑ Date of last back flush 2010 24. Was a signal received at the Central Station"monitoring company? N/A YesO No,❑ 25. Is the hydraulic nameplate installed and visible on riser, if No then Yellow Tag. Yes No ❑ (Ref: NFPA 25 5.2.7) 26. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Date Yes No❑ Performed 2010 199 Sunset Ave S, Edmonds WA Sprinklers - Dry Page 2 of 2 CINTAS FIRE PROTECTION 1002 CENTRAL AVE NORTH JUL 0 2Q9� KENT WA 98032 253-852-1962 OFFICE 253-852-2049 FAX General Contractor: CINTAFP904DJ Fire Sprinkler Level III: CINAFP904DJ SPRINKLERS- DRY Certification Given RED YELLOW WHITE X (One System per Report) CONFIDENCE TEST - I REPAIRS Occupancy Address: 71 Main ST, Edmonds WA Occupancy Name: Edmonds Ferry Terminal Building Owner: Phone Number: Responsible Person: Phone Number: Building Owner Address: Date of Inspection: 6/9/11 Inspection Annual X❑ Frequency/ Type: Quarterly Testers Name (Please Print): Mickey Hilderbrand SFD Certification Number: SCP-06762 Central Station Monitoring? Yes X . No Monitoring Company Name: Guardian Primary Component: Fire Sprinker System Make: Central System Model: Identification System Location: FA control room Number: PROBLEMS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) SFD Certification Number: SCP- This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Department Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted d h e �reped to Signature of Tester: 111"bp the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Phone # 253-852-1962 Testing Agency: CINT S FIRE PROTECTION Mailing Address: 1002 Central Ave N Kent Wa 98032 Building Representative: (signature) Sprinklers - Dry Edmonds Ferry Terminal Page 1 of 2 i �1 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Department Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General 1. Trip test conducted? Yes X No ❑ 2. System tripped in DT, seconds. 3. Flow test conducted? Yes ❑X No ❑ 4. , Static pressure:130 psi _ ''Flow pressure: 1.15 psi 5. Number of Sprinkler Heads? 6. 2-inch drain? : Other X. Yes ❑ No ❑ 7. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ :Alarm bell operates ;., : ;. N/A : ❑ Yes [g . No Q 9. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes or less? Yes ❑x No ❑ 10:: Heat actuation: devices tested on::pre-action� and,deluge :. N /A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑:. systems? 11. System inspected and lubricated? Yes ❑X No ❑ 12. Valves"are sealed or supervised? .. Yes ❑x No 13. Signs are provided on valves? Yes ❑x No ❑ la.,. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed and turn freely? Yes K. No ❑ 15. Sprinkler heads replaced or successfully sample tested in last 10 years? Yes ❑x No ❑ 16. Sprinkler,coverage s_acceptable? Yes.o No,❑ 17. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrench Yes ❑x No ❑ for each? 18. System 1eft in service?: Yes ❑x No ❑ 19. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5-years? Yes ❑x - No ❑- 20. Sprinkler heads. free of corrosion,: paint, obstructions and/or physical Yes ❑x No ❑ damage? 21. System drained and restored to normal operation? Yes x❑ No[:] . 22.. Was debris found'in the Fire. Department -Conn e*ctioh (FDC)? Yes ❑ No ❑x 23. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed in the last 5 Yes ❑x No ❑ years? 24. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring N/A ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ company? 25. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 Yes ❑x No ❑ years? Date Performed Sprinklers - Dry Edmonds Ferry Terminal Page 2 of 2 CINTAS FIRE PROTECTION Confidence Test Report 1002 CENTRAL AVE NORTH JUL 0 7 2011 KENT WA 98032 PHONE: 253-852-1962 FAX: 253-852-2049 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM Certification Given (One System per Report) RED LJ I YELLOW WHITE 'J' CONFIDENCE TEST "'l I REPAIRS Occupancy Address: 71 Main ST, Edmonds WA Occupancy Name: Edmonds Ferry Terminal Building Owner: Phone Number: Responsible Person: Phone Number: Building Owner Address: - Date of Inspection: 6/9/11 Inspection Annual X❑ Frequency/Type: quarterly ❑ (High Rise only) Testers Name SFD Certification (Please Print): Mickey Hilderbrand Number: SCP-06762 Central Station Yes ❑X No ❑ Monitoring? Monitoring Company Name: Guardian Primary Component: Fire Alarm System Make: Radionics System Model: D9024 System Location: FA control room Identification Number: PROBLEMS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) SFD Certification Number: This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Department Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and ave been �reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: ' V l Phone # 253-852-1962 Testing Agency: C114TAS FIRE PROTECTION Mailing Address: 1002 Central Ave N Kent Wa 98032 Building Representative (signature) CTF- 01 Edmonds Ferry Terminal Page 1 of 2 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Department Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. Alarm System Functionality Trouble signal with AC power off? Yes ❑x No ❑ System operates properly on battery backup? ; Yes ❑x No El Battery voltage (no load) 26.2 volts Battery voltage (full load) 25;9 olts (signals operating) Charge circuit voltage 26.8 Volts System operates properly. on: standby power? Yes x❑, No El All signals operate on AC power? Yes x❑ No ❑ Number of; initiating circuits "Addressable Number of signal circuits Does alarm system meet audibility standards? : Yes ❑X No 11 All circuits checked for electrical supervision? _. Yes_❑x No ❑. All auxiliarya ui merit operates ..(Elevators; fans, dampers)?„ , . _- G p N/A x❑ .. Yes. ❑ No 0 Ventilation controls operate? N/A ❑x . Yes ❑ .,,No ❑ Key to panel available? - Yes ❑x No'❑ . Operating instructions at panel? Yes ❑ No ❑ .Trouble indicators function properly? Yes X:.=,. No❑ Remote Annunciator Panels function properly? N/A ❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Elevator Call Drown functions properly? _ : _. _ N%A ❑x : Yes ❑ No Test record posted at panel? Yes ❑ No ❑ General alarm automatic time .delay. (minutes) : N/A - Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring company? N/A ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Other Devices: S 'ec r ` { - N/A ❑:: Yes ❑ No Total Number of Total Number System Devices Units in Building Units Tested Test Results Acceptable 1_.. BeIIs,;Horns, Chimes All ail, N /A ❑ Yes X .: _ No ❑ .. 2. Voice Speakers (Voice Clarity) N/A ❑ Yes ElNo ❑ . 3. Smoke. Detectors An ...: All. N/A_ El, . Yes ❑x - No[]: 4. Heat Detectors N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 5 _ .Duct Defectors N/A: ❑ Yes ❑... No `❑ ; 6. Sprinkler Flow Switches 1 N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 7. S Su erviso Switches a . p p ry. _ 3 ; .. 3 N/A_° ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ . _rinkler 8. Visual Alarm Devices All All N/A ❑ Yes x❑ No ❑ 9 _. Manual Pull Stations , `. _ N/A. ❑ Yes❑No ❑ 10. Annunciator(s) N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 11. Beam Detectors N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 12. Automatic Door Unlocks N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 13. Automatic Door Release N/A Yes ❑ No ❑ Total Number of Total Number Units Communication Equipment Units in Building Tested Test Results Acceptable 14.. Phone Sets N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 15. Phone Jacks N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 16. Call -in Signal N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No El CTF- 01 Edmonds Ferry Terminal Page 2 of 2 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TM AVENUE N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (425) 771-0215 FIRE DEPARTMENT 4�'St. 1890 LOCATION: 71 Main St BUSINESS NAME: Edmonds Ferry Dock & Pass Terminal MAILING 71 Main St FIRE PREVENTION SAFETY SURVEY PHONE: 4257120228 FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT 366 17 D SCHEDULED ► 05/01/10 DATE DUE UFIR ► 177 5 252 ADDRESS: Edmonds 98020 � BUSINESS OWNER: WA State DOT HOME PHONE: 4257120228 EMERGENCY-1: Fwx# 206-5E7-5636 HOME PHONE: 2 `ff- `� Z-3 S-7f KEY ACCESS-2: Dock Agent HOME PHONE: 4257120228 PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE � N(>. 'h NAME OF INSPECTOR: FIRE FA 6/07 AS 6/07 ND Lkl3x rE f_L sysrEMs: '6101 (C'/os_. ANNUAL -- HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS % COMMUNICATIONS % Y� ENTER CODE ONLY ONCE ► VIOLATION CODE 1 c L - s 'U v 2 G f� fsiz?c'�G�f LfG /f� �.� 1. 2 3 3 4 4 5 5' 6 6 7 7 .. _ .. 8 _ - 8 1st RE -INSPECTION - DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: �1 PERSON f Vl.(�//`-� '� y� , CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: U INSPECTOR INSPECTOR- 2 DATE: r V ` / 0 DATE: DATE: _ 3 VIOLATIONS 115 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 4 8 4 8 DATE: DISPOSITION: 7 8 LETTER NEEDED ® YES C] NO LETTER NEEDED [ YES ❑ NO FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY a. i` John J. Westfall From: John J. Westfall Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 3:58 PM To: Scott, Mark; Renshaw, Mathew Subject: Edmonds Ferry Terminal Hi Mark & Matt: Thanks for the meeting on 2/7. Here's the information we discussed: 1) 1 have a 14 y.o. letter from you with the occupant load (OL) calculations-941 total (771 overhead span calc'd @ 3 s.f./person + 170 for building calc'd @ 15 s.f.). As discussed, that doesn't play into any reduction in fire alarm requirements as 1000 OL and greater requires only additional voice evacuation. We discussed that and you already have the non -fire public address system and attendants on duty anyway. 2) The 2010 Fire Alarm Code makes no allowance for 1:20 slope along ceilings in spacing detectors: 17.7.3.1.2 The design shall account for the contribution of the following factors in predicting detector response to the anticipated fires to which the system is intended to respond: (1)Ceiling shape and surface (2)Ceiling height (3)Configurotion of contents in the protected area (4)Combustion characteristics and probable equivalence ratio of the anticipated fires involving the fuel loads within the protected area (5)Comportment ventilation (6)Ambient temperature, pressure, altitude, humidity, and atmosphere 3) Sloped ceilings are addressed vertically from floor to peak/beam, with no secondary consideration to a slope along the design -spacing axis. 17.6.3.4* Sloping Ceilings (Peaked and Shed). 17.6.3.4.1 Spacing. 17.6.3.4.1.1 Ceiling Slope Less Than 30 Degrees. For a ceiling slope of less than 30 degrees, all detectors shall be spaced using the height at the peak. 4) Performance -based design for smoke detection can be found at NFPA 72 - 17.3 and Annex B. Permit will be required for redesign of existing system. 5) Given the roof/ceiling construction, only a single branch of smoke detectors are required because the beam is not flush against the ceiling so the ceiling forms a single void across the beam. Original design and review did not take this feature into account. 6) Any independent heat initiating devices (electrical room) may be removed in lieu of existing automatic fire sprinkler system. Heat devices with any control functions must remain. 7) 2010 Fire Alarm Code makes allowances for other transmitting mediums including broadband, cable, radio/AES, cellular and other monitoring. Currently you have two dedicated copper telephone lines that is a cost to you in addition to the monitoring service. I suggest that the monitoring feature be evaluated that can save you money. 8) VrmitVill be required when a. Fire Alarm Control Panel is replaced, b. FACP is relocated, or c. monitoring transmission medium is changed. I'll need reflected ceiling plans showing the detector changes proposed and text description of proposed work. Relocation or design rearrangement of heads will only require reflected ceiling plans direct to me -no permit, however, I'll inspect the work. Let me know if you have questions. John J. Westfall Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Services 425-771-0213 Desk 425-775-7721 Fax 425-231-3644 Mobile FIRRE DISTR, t John J. Westfall From: John J. Westfall Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:55 PM 'To: 'Murdock, Scott'; Scott, Mark; Renshaw, Mathew 'Subject: RE: Accepted: Edmonds Fire Protection System Upgrade Ok, Scott. This isn't out of the ordinary to outlive the old technology in alarm systems, in this case, it isn't that old of a system and a case of lowest bid. Offhand, a doctor would suggest a second opinion. As part of system upgrade, I suggest you re-evaluate costs for monitoring lines. We now allow, in addition to plain old copper telephone lines; broadband, cable, cellular, radio (AES) or other transmission links. See you Monday. John From: Murdock, Scott [mailto:SMurdockCawsdot.wa.gov] Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:45 PM To: Scott, Mark; Renshaw, Mathew Cc: John J. Westfall Subject: RE: Accepted: Edmonds Fire Protection System Upgrade John We have been getting trouble alarms for smoke detectors and we have had A-1Fire out to work on the system. They have cleaned the smoke detectors. They have searched for a replacement detector but cannot find one. The main panel is also not upgradeable. This is why we are looking replacing the fire detection system. From: Scott, Mark Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:29 PM To: Murdock, Scott; Renshaw, Mathew Cc: 'John J. Westfall' Subject: RE: Accepted: Edmonds Fire Protection System Upgrade Scott or Mathew, can you answer Johns question below about service reports? Mark A. Scott, Architect Facilities Office M & O Division ELG Bldg 7345 Linderson Way, SW Turnwater, WA 98501 (360) 561-1206 cell (360) 705-7367 office =---- Original Appointment ----- From: John J. Westfall [mailto:jwestfall@firedistrictl.org] Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:14 PM 1 A-1 Fire Equipment Inc. Confidence Test Report 1002 Central Ave N Kent Wa 98032 253-852-1962 < 71 A4Pr-fN bI2< FIRE ALARM SYSTEM Certification Given (One System per Report) JRED YELLOW WHITE CONFIDENCE TEST REPAIRS Occupancy Address: EDMONDS WA 98020 Occupancy N EDMONDS FERRY DOCK pa cy time: Building Owner: SAME Phone Number: 206-515-3696 Responsible Person: SUPERVISOR Phone Number: SAME Building Owner Address: SAME Date of Inspection: Inspection Annual 6-18-10 Frequency/Type: Quarterly El (High Rise Only) Testers Name SFD Certification (Please Print): Joel Norris Number: SCP-N-04323 Central Station Yes ® No p Monitoring Monitoring? Company Name: INTERCEPT CONTROL Primary Component: Fire Alarm System Make: RADIONICS System Model: D9024 System Location: Identification ELECTRICAL ROOM Number: PROBLEMS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) t CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) SFD Certification Number: This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been property inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Department .din -J _ J Fire Code standards, and that "-r�!•��w �+�� wLau vnu novc I MPUIICU W UIC umiuing Vwner/Manager Tor corrective action. Signature of Tester: Phone # 253-852-1962 Testing Agency: A-1 Fire Equipment Inc. Mailing Address: 1002 Central Ave N Kent Wa 98032 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Department Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. Alarm System Functional Trouble signal with AC power off? Yes ® No ❑ <.. moperates.properly on°battery,'.backup?. Yes ® ` -No ❑:'; Battery voltage (no load) 26.55VOlts Battery voltage {full loadj, 25 d volts,`(srgrials operation g).< , Charge circuit voltage 26.98VOlts ;<System;;operates properly. standby: power? Yes. ® No ❑ '' All signals operate on AC power? Yes ® NO ❑ Number:`of mihatyn'c+rccits 3 : ° Number of signal circuits 2 Does .alarm system: meet auiiibiliiy atandards? :Yes �;; :;No ❑' All circuits checked for electrical supervision? Yes ® No ❑ ,.All* auxiliary;equipment operates481eyators; :fans; ,dampers)? : ` : _. N% 'Yes Q.: ' i No ❑ Ventilation controls operate? N A ® Yes El No ❑ Y to` pane. available? .::. Operating instructions at panel? Yes® No❑ Trouble indicatorsfunction properly? w Remote Annunciator Panels function properly? :. Yes Elevator;Call Down functionsrorty? N/A ® ®; Yes ❑ Yes Q J'No.❑ No ❑ record posted at Test r panel? Yes.,® No ❑ `General°alarm automat�ctlme. delay :Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring' company? N/A ❑ Yes ® No El •n�hnr. ,i�GltnrAr'1C."'�..`.:.:F'.�''."�gtu+l_-t.-:'.�k., n.:,-,�. r:.'^+t"KS: w'Ai'� ;,, e . �.tr..;3:,z".G.r,�td."'� ......_�........,...s, ra•x--- ----:�n _.• .. _. _ , > . _ ... .,_____ - System Devices Total Number of Total Number 1 : , BeIIs,:HQrns '.:Chimes Units in Building 1: 2s Units Tested 23.-; - Test A' r N /�+ D Results Acceptable ,Yes � � No ❑ 2 Voice S (V Speakers (Voice Clarity) N/A . Ye 4. Heat 4 _ NIA D. Yes ®. No In Detectors 5 Dud.Debtors., - � N/A N/A Yes ® I� Yes ❑ ' No ❑ - ❑ 6 - Sprinkler Flow Switches 1, IV%A ❑ Yes .No No ,7... ; :Sprinkler::Sul�erv�sory::Switches `N/A D Yes ® No ❑: " 8 Visual Alarm Devices 2 4 - 24 N/A . ❑ Yes ® No 9 ManUld:Pull Stat+ons>.. ; y sr s M/A Yes. ; 10. Annunciator(s) 2 2 N/A .❑ ❑ .. Yes ® :No. No El11. Beam Detectors N/A ® Yes ❑ No ❑ 12. ' Automatic Door Unlocks Automatic N/A ® Yes ❑ No ❑ 13 � -Dour; Release _ N/A` Yes ❑ . No f^I ` . Total Number of Total Number Units Communication E UI merit Units in Buildinq Tested Test Results Acce ble .14 PhoneSets NIA► 1�- Yes ❑ No ❑ 15 Phone Jacks N/A ® Yes ❑ No ❑ 16 Call" S'` nil jN/A - _ ;Yes ❑:. , :No f l A-1 Fire Equipment Inc. Confidence Test Report 1002 Central Ave N Kent Wa 98032 253-852-1962 SPRINKLERS - DRY Certification Given (One System per Report) RED YELLOW WHITE CONFIDENCE TEST REPAIRS Occupancy Address: 199 SUNSET AVE SOUTH Occupancy Name: EDMONDS FERRY DOCK EDMONDS WA 98020 Building Owner: SAME Phone Number: 206-515-3696 Responsible Person: SUPERVISOR Phone Number: SAME Building Owner Address: SAME Date of Inspection: - Inspection - 6-18-10 Frequency/ Type: Annual Testers Name SFD Certification (Please Print): Joel Norris Number: SCP-N-04323 Central Station Yes x No Monitoring? Monitoring Company Name: INTERCEPT CCONTOL Primary Component: Fire sprinker System Make: CENTRAL System Model System Location: RISER ROOM Identification Number: DOCK PROBLEMS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) 1 FDC DUE INSPECTION. CAPS BROKEN OFF AND MISSING. CORRECTYONS MADE: Date Corrected: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Corrected By: SFD Certification Number: SCP- This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Department Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: Phone # 253-852-1962 Testing Agency: A-1 Fine Equipment Inc. Mailing Address: 1002 Central Ave N Kent Wa 98032 Building Representative: (signature) a The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Department Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General 1. Trip test conducted? Yes ® No ❑ '2 S'Sterii'trlppedt�n'2s seconds 3. Flow test conducted? Yes ® No ❑ 4 Static pressure3ops� - F16 pressure: 120psi 5. Number of Sprinkler. Heads? +-iso :6 2 j nch�':drain? � � � :: ' ether YeS ❑ ;No ❑ 7. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes ® No ❑ 8 Alarm' bell operates a r N/A `.. �. Yes ® No ❑ 9. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes or less? Yes ® .. No ❑ 10 Heat actuatton'Jdevices tested'on pre -action and deluge systems? NIA ® Yes ❑ No'❑ 11. System inspected and lubricated? Yes ® No ❑'r 12 Valves are sealed or superv,sed� Yes ® - Y _ . No ❑ 13. Signs are provided on valves? Yes ® . No ❑ 1+ Pumper connections and,clapper valves unobstructed and tum freely? Y Yes r No 15. Sprinkler heads replaced or successfully sample tested in last 10 years? Yes ❑ No ❑ 16 r, Sprinkler coverage is accreptatife? �_ Yes"� f No'❑ 17. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrench for each? Yes ® No ❑ 18 System left m Service? No ❑ 19. System gauges replaced or calibrated within -the last 5 years? Yes ® No- ❑ 20 S rYnlder heads�free of corrosion p , paint, obstructions and/or physEcal - damages Yes No Ip 21. System drained and restored to normal operation? Yes ® No ❑ 22 1Na5debns found in the Fire Department Connection AFDC)? `Yes D No 23. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed in the last 5 years? Yes El No 24 Was a signal receivQd`at the Central Station moniton company? _ . r N/�► Yes , No ❑ k 25. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Date Performed Yes ® No ❑ '71 k,�, AIA, nJ ,?-, Date: To: From: Subject: EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM September 17, 2003 Assistant Chief Luke Carpenter, PSMFC, Bainbridge Island Fire Department Thomas J. Tomberg, Fire Chief Steve Allison, Battalion Chief Bob Schmitt, Battalion Chief Don White, Lieutenant Edmonds Fire Department Review — MV Puyallup Fire Drill The Edmonds Fire Department (EFD) and Washington State Ferries (WSF) conducted a fire drill on the MV Puyallup at the Edmonds Ferry Dock on September 14, 2003. Participating agencies in addition to the Edmonds Fire Department and WSF were the Emergency Services Coordinating Agency (ESCA), Puget Sound Marine Firefighting Commission, the Edmonds Police Department (EPD), and SNOCOM Dispatch. The Lynnwood Fire Department and Fire District 1/Mountlake Terrace Fire Department participated as automatic aid units in support of EFD. Exercise Obiectives 4. Edmonds Fire Department and WSF vessel personnel will demonstrate marine firefighting response tactics and procedures. • Demonstrate familiarization with vessel fire safety plans. Ferry plans are carried on the duty Battalion Chief's vehicle, and were available to tactical crews that attacked the fire. Plans. for the Puyallup -class vessel were used by both the Incident Commander and the tactical crews. • Demonstrate the capacity to isolate electrical power to the affected ship space. Tactical crews worked with ship Engineering personnel to ensure isolation of electrical power. OFFICE OF THE FIRE CHIEF • Demonstrate the capacity to feed water from shore to the ship's fire main. Tactical crews made the connection from the landside hydrant to a pumping engine and from the engine to the ship's fire main. The presence of a second hydrant west of the BNSF railroad tracks was identified. • Demonstrate ability to initiate sprinkler system on one auto deck fire zone. Canceled. • Examine employment of available on -board fire fighting equipment. Tactical crews used on -board firefighting equipment, taking over from ship personnel upon arrival. Demonstrate the ability to track and evaluate water management and ship's stability. In conversation with ship Engineers and deck personnel it was established that the vessel is able to shed fire suppression water. Edmonds Fire Department Objectives • Demonstrate coordinated response actions with WSF terminal staff prior to ferry arrival. The first -arriving EFD Officer established one-on-one contact with the Terminal Agent prior to the arrival of the vessel. The Terminal Agent served as part of Unified Command. Demonstrate radio communications with MV Puyallup using Ferry Terminal Agent -provided 800 MHz radio. EFD personnel were able to contact the Master of the Puyallup on VHF mobile and portable radios on Marine 22 (EFD 16). • Coordinate fire apparatus/command post staging with WSF terminal staff. The Incident Command Post, Staging, Base and apparatus parking was coordinated with the WSF terminal staff. • Demonstrate track closure procedure. Contact with BNSF to establish track closure procedures was simulated through SNOCOM. • Demonstrate Unified Command operations with Police and WSF participants. Unified Command was established and included the EFD on -duty Battalion Chief, EPD Watch Commander, and WSF Terminal Agent. • Demonstrate pre -entry fire suppression planning with engine crew in response to upper decks simulated fire. Tactical crews consulted with WSF crews prior to attacking the upper deck fire. Rapid Intervention Teams (RIT Teams) were established. • Demonstrate fire team entry and fire suppression in a below decks space. Tactical crews, in coordination with WSF crews, made entry and initiated fire suppression in below deck spaces. Rapid Intervention Teams (RIT Teams) were established. • Demonstrate fire team entry and fire suppression in an upper decks space. Tactical crews, in coordination with WSF crews, made entry and initiated fire suppression in upper deck spaces. Rapid Intervention Teams (RIT Teams) were established. • Demonstrate familiarization with vessel fire safety plans. EFD crews conducted pre -planning walk-throughs, ride-alongs, and met with ferry administrators, managers, and crews to develop an understanding of coordinated emergency actions by on -board staff prior to the arrival of EFD personnel. • Demonstrate capability to de -energize electric power to affected ship spaces. EFD crews coordinated de -energizing electric power to the vessel through the ship's crew. • Demonstrate water supply connection from shore to ship's fire main. Tactical crews made the connection from the landside hydrant to a pumping engine and from the engine to the ship's fire main. The presence of a second hydrant west of the BNSF railroad tracks was identified. • Demonstrate use of the inundation sprinkler system on one auto deck zone. Canceled. • Examine employment of available on -board fire fighting equipment. Tactical crews used on -board firefighting equipment, taking over from ship personnel upon arrival. Demonstrate the ability to track and evaluate water management related to ship's stability. In conversation with ship's engineers and deck personnel it was established that the vessel is able to shed fire suppression water. • Clarify Emergency Service Coordinating Agency (ESCA) support to Unified Incident Command for ferry fire scenario. ESCA staff served as logistical support and provided a communications and contact link from the scene as portable and mobile communications with SNOCOM proved erratic. EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT - LESSONS LEARNED AND VALUABLE REMINDERS The Lessons Learned and Valuable Reminders below are hi -lights from the September 14, 2003 WSF fire drill aboard the MV Puyallup, and are not intended to examine every aspect of marine firefighting, and/or the Incident Command System. 1. Make face-to-face contact with the Terminal Agent. 2. Establish Unified Command — EFD, EPD, and WSF Terminal Agent. Include appropriate Liaisons as they appear at the Command Post per the Incident Command System. All Divisons and functions were grouped west of the tracks for convenience purposes; that would not be done in a real situation. 3. Establish communications with the Master on Marine 22 ASAP to determine the extent of the emergency, and what actions are being taken on the inbound vessel to neutralize same. 4. Make face-to-face contact with the Engineer and Mate as soon as the ferry docks. Consult with them prior to beginning search, rescue, containment, and suppression operations. 5. Be prepared for up to 250 vehicles of all types and sizes occupying deck spaces, and up to 1,200 people (2,500 on MK II Ferries) attempting to exit from a frightening, potentially smoke -choked environment. Vehicles may be lined up in the holding lanes on the dock making the North side of the pier unavailable for Fire apparatus and severely complicate access. 6. We seldom have the personnel or an incident of sufficient size to designate an Operations Commander; however, this is a call type of sufficient magnitude to designate an Operations Commander, and provide aide(s) to support the strategic objectives: evacuation, search and rescue, containment and suppression, property conservation, and protection of the environment. 7. Call for resources immediately upon a confirmed incident. Request a Third Alarm and consider a Zone Response if not for action on the incident itself then to backfill Southwest Snohomish County Fire Stations. Backfill companies require "bird dogs." 8. Call for ESCA response to the scene. They are a valuable resource for contacts, coordination, resources, and ordering numbers if the incident moves beyond a Zone Response. 9. Designate Staging and Base. Every Fire crew that walks in does so with SCBAs, spare bottles, Apartment Packs, hand lights, irons, PPV fans, and RIT Bags. 10. Designate Aides, not one but as many as required. Tape off the area and keep extraneous personnel from wandering into the Command area. 11. Pull the ferry plans from the BC rig; pull the pre -plan. Attack from the uninvolved to the involved; use PPV to best advantage. 12. Initial attack crews carry on the Thermal Imaging Camera. 13. Ensure the Master has notified the Coast Guard. 14. Request dispatch of the Seattle Fire Department and Kitsap County fire boats. 15. Request Coast Guard and Snohomish County Sheriff's Office helicopters - eye in the sky, rescue for jumpers, etc. as required. 16. Staff the Port Boat - rescue, 360 degree perspective. 17. Communications with SNOCOM (until 800 MHz) can be expected to be erratic whether from mobile or portable radios. Use an open cell phone if required. 18. Establish two Medical Group functions: one for the off-loading passengers, one for the incident. Advise Stevens Hospital and Harborview Medical Center as required. 19. Establish as many Safety Officers as required, to include one for each Division/Deck. 20. Establish individual RIT Teams for each Division/Deck as required. 21. Call for the Technical Rescue Team for confined space rescue standby as required. 22. Call for the Hazmat Team as required. 23. Ensure BNSF understands the gravity of the situation. During the early morning hours of this drill when there are no scheduled ferry runs, two trains passed through the City. During daylight hours train traffic is more frequent and will increase in the years ahead. 24. By the time EFD units arrive on scene, WSF personnel conducting fire suppression operations will have likely exhausted their air bottles. Be prepared for that eventuality. WSF personnel use Scott air bottles. 25. Call for Air Supply. SCBA bottles will be rapidly drained. 26. Consider a request to establish a FAA 91-91, and a Maritime Exclusionary Zone. The former is a request to the FAA to establish an aircraft -free zone over the incident. This will keep unauthorized aircraft over flying or hovering over the scene. Be sure to specify a zone, for example, `one mile by one mile." A Maritime Exclusionary Zone request directed to the Coast Guard will prevent well -intended volunteers in private vessels from approaching the scene. 27. Treat the scene as a crime scene. 28. Police and WSF personnel will conduct evacuation, containment of passengers, and coordinate their transport and interrogation. 29. Open the City EOC. Trained City personnel can coordinate PIO duties with WSF; ensure the Senior Center and/or Francis Anderson Center are open to accept passengers; and post incident information on the City phone line and website. 30. Be alert for secondary devices, regardless of the type of dispatched call. WSF personnel should sweep for secondaries — they will recognize things out of place better than we will. 31. There are two hydrants west of the tracks; establish a secondary Water source. Do not pump more than 150 psi into the on -board ship fire main. Since the hydrant may deliver up to 180 psi, the pump operator will have to gate the pressure down. Do not manifold from the hydrant; maintain pressure to adjust psi in case pumping becomes a necessity. CC: Mayor Haakenson Police Chief Stern ESCA Director Lyn Gross SNOCOM Director Steve Perry Lynnwood Fire Chief Gary Olson District 1/Mountlake Terrace Deputy Chief Brad Reading All Edmonds Fire Department Personnel 03/0,6/03 11:27:53 PRINT REQUESTED BY TERMINAL EFPC07 Incident History for: 4EF03000718 Xref: #EP03005401 Case Numbers: $EF03000837 Received 03/06/03 06:45:41 BY SCPC07 SC759 Entered 03/06/03 06:47:25 BY SCPC07 SC759 Dispatched 03/06/03 06:47:28 BY SCPC06 SC742 Enroute 03/06/03 06:50:19 Onscene 03/06/03 06:53:00 Closed 03/06/03 07:33:50 Initial Type: SPILL Initial Alarm Level: 1 Final Alarm Level: 1 Final Type: SPILL (HAZ MAT SPILL/LEAK -SPLIT RESP) Pri: 2 Dispo: Police BLK: E040 Fire BLK: EF202 Map Page: Group: EF1 Beat: MD17 Src: 9 Loc: 71 MAIN ST ,EDM -- FERRY TERMINAL (V) Loc Info: Name: ROCK (C) Addr: 71 W MAIN ,EDM Phone: 2065152392 /0647 (SC759 ) ENTRY ,DIESEL FUEL FROM PASENGER VEH ON FERRY--APPROX 40 GAL /0647 (SC742 ) DISP E17 #EF1539 WHITE, DON - HAZMAT TECH #EF1538 STEINBACH, J HAZMAT TECH #EF0326 PETRELLA,MARC /0647 $ASNCAS E17 $EF03000837 ../0647 ASST E16 #EF0991 DAHL,DOUGLAS 4EF1532 KRUGMIRE,DAVE -HAZMAT TECH 4EF1541 HAAS, DEVIN /0647 (SC759 ) SUPP TXT: FERRY IS AT TERMINAL --CREW TRYING TO CONTAI N SPILL /0650 (SC742 ) ENROUT E16 /0650 ENROUT E17 /0650 ASSTER B20 #EF0232 SCHMITT,ROBERT - BC /0653 ONSCNE E17 FLOOR END OF BOAT, WBI /0653 ONSCNE B20 /0653 NEWLOC B20 [MAIN ST COMMAND] /0654 (SC758 ) CROSS #EP03005401 /0655 (SC742 ) ONSCNE E16 [EAST END TRACKS] /0655 MISC E17 ,NEED E16? /0656 (SC726 ) CROSS #EP03005401 /0657 (SC742 ) MISC B20 ,UPDATE MOST OF SPILL BEEN CONTAINED - WORKING 0 N SECURING THE LEAK HAVE E16 STANDBY FOR FEW /0710 MISC B20 ,UPDATE - LEAK STOPPED BACK THE TRUCK/TRAILER OF F FERRY STAGED /0710 MISC B20 ,TO E16 - LIKE U TO GO TO SOUTH END TO FERRY HOL DING LANE WEST OF CITY PARK - BACK HIM DOWN INTO FERRY LANE WILL HAVE MECHANIC COME AND REPAIR T HIS /0711 MISC B20 ,TO E16 PULL SPILL KIT OUT AND PLACE PAD UNDER V EH IN CASE OF ANOTHER LEAK /0722 (SC726 ) AOR E16 - /0724 (SC742.) MISC B20 ,COMMAND TERMINATED /0724 AOR B20 /0733 AOR E17 ,LEAK HAS BEEN STOPPED TRUCK WAITING FOR MAINT /0733 CLOSE E17 FIRWX010 Snohomish County, Washington Page 1 EFD EF03-718 Edmonds Fire Department 03/06/2003 FIELD INCIDENT REPORT DISPATCHED INCIDENT --------------------- Agcy EFD Run # EF03-718 Incident Date 03/06/2003 Time'06:47:25 Location 71 MAIN ST, EDMONDS, WA 98020 City Map County Map Census Fire Block EF202 Coord: X Y Jurisdictional Station STATION 17 Alarm Method TELEPHONE DIRECT TO FIRE DEPARTMENT Alarm Level 1 This incident is owned by R Purge Date Dispatch Date 03/06/2003 Time 06:47:28 Enroute Date 03/06/2003 Time 06:50:19 Arrival Date 03/06/2003 Time 06:53:00 Clear Date 03/06/2003 Time 07:33:50 Response Time: Minutes 5 Sec 32 Incident Duration: Hours Min 46 ALL INCIDENTS --------------- Exp # 0 Location 71 MAIN ST, EDMONDS, WA 98020 City Map County Map Census Fire Block EF202 Coord: X Y Shift A SHIFT Investigation Status Situations Found: 1 FLAMMABLE GAS OR LIQUID CONDITION Actions Taken: 1 INVESTIGATE General Property Use MOTOR VEHICLE TRANSPORTATION USE Specific Property Use Management Occupancy Type Structure Type Structure Status Occupied.at time of Inc Number Responding: F.F. Career 7 F.F. Volunteer Engines '2 Trucks Aerial Command 1 EMS Tankers Rescue Hazmat Others Member Reporting EF1539 / WHITE, DONALD Officer in Charge EF1539 / WHITE, DONALD FIRWAt10 Snohomish County, Washington EFD EF03-718 Edmonds Fire Department FIELD INCIDENT REPORT Weather Air Temperature Wildland Haz Severity Fire Service Casualties: Injuries Fatalities Non -Fire Service Casualties: Injuries Fatalities Page 2 03/06/2003 Aid Type NO AUTO/MUTUAL AID GIVEN/RECEIVED OR NOT REPORTED Aid Agency NOT APPLICABLE . Multiagency Inc. No. Special Studies: 1 NARRATIVE EF0232 03/06/2003 B20 B20 responded with E17 and E16 to a reported spill on Washington State Ferry. E17 on scene first, B20 set up Main Street Command. Ferry employees were already cleaning up diesel spill from truck that had broken a valve while going down the ramp boarding the ferry. B20 coordinated plans between ferry captain and police with dispostion of truck. Ferry diesel mechanics were able to stop leak. The truck was able to back off the ferry and a staging area was set up on SR104 Ferry Lanes for the truck to stay until a mechanic could fix the valve. B20 terminated command, returned in service. Bob Schmitt, BC EF1539 03/06/2003 E17 E-17 responded with E16 and B20 to the Edmonds Ferry Terminal for a reported diesel spill. E-17 found a tractor-traler combination with a damaged fitting on a 125 gallon tank. Ferry personnel had contained the leak, and were in the later stages of cleanup. Crews wereequipped with adequate amounts of absorbant material, and had fire extinguishers available. After verifying that the leak was stopped, E-17 escorted the truck to the feyy holding lanes, where the driver was to await service. E-17 verified that there was no additional fluid leaking and returned to service. No equipment from E-17 was used. Lt White Ii Westfall, John From: Chave, Rob Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:59 PM To: Westfall, John Subject: RE: WSF Shoreline Permit The permit is to extend the approval of the overhead passenger loading facility (it had received a conditional approval, which expired a year ago). There is no new construction. You should probably talk to Arvilla if she has any concerns. I don't know of anything else.... The permit will not be "transferable" -- it only applies to the existing facility. -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:12 PM To: Chave, Rob Cc: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: WSF Shoreline Permit Rob: Are there any building/safety ramifications with regard to the 71 W. Main St. dock? Will this permit be transferable when/if the dock is moved iaw the Edmonds Crossing project? Thank you, John IiS S 7�'l- t j� �iiyyJJZiiyJJ Y1 f'• .l. � it cA0, F, �- "FS -.`:. 5 f`� .` +�="'-'fyYit+`�c5 Y}3if� h--4'te.4'�`,�,•.'�n� 't, C r r.� _..�C, IIN, .-,,,•��,.'r_v -d'J�l :..gyp. c1'^S•}si"' :,. ..,,,,,� r.: '�•��c`,'1 � , ^� �' $•«tr451 Rwiv x r Y t J,'lowu y k�- YF.J jp•r ��"y(�� j/''`"-1` -d .l-""- Photograph 3: View from the South County Senior Center, looking northwest. Edmonds Overhead Loading 005275 February 2003 Washington State Ferries r 020077-05 to _ =I(:, Westfall, John From: Conley, Kevin [safetmp@WSDOT.WA.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:40 AM To: 'Westfall, John's Subject: RE: Edmonds Passenger Overhead Walkway.... John, It would be most advantages if you could be at the next committ meetin to finalize this issue for the attendees. This meeting will be held on Friday, February 14 h and begins at 8:30 until 3:00 at Pier Terminal building (Spike Eikum Con ence Room Any time in the morning would work for the committee. Please feel free to ca and advise at (206) 515-3910. Thank you, Kevin W. Conley WSF Safety Office -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John [mailto:Westfall@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:35 AM To: 'Conley, Kevin' Subject: RE: Edmonds Passenger Overhead Walkway.... Mr. Conley: The escape route is the stairway near the end of the fixed span. The Fire Department was included and involved during review and construction of the structure. This is not a safety concern for us, however I understand that customers and employees may have some concerns. I would be happy to discuss this with you at greater length with you or your safety committee. I have recently emailed information regarding the operations booth to Rick at Edmonds Dock. Thanks for your interest John Westfall Edmonds Fire Marshal 425 771-0213 -----Original Message ----- From: Conley, Kevin [mailto:safetmp@WSDOT.WA.GOV] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:55 AM To: 'westfall@ci.edmonds.wa.us' Cc: Davis, Scott (WSF) Subject: Edmonds Passenger Overhead Walkway.... Good Morning John, WSF personnel's concern at the Edmonds Terminal is focused on there is no escape route on the Passenger Overhead Walkway, from the mid -span to the vessel -boarding platform. Is this not a safety concern and did this pass inspection by your department? Please advise. Many thanks, Kevin W. Conley Washington State Ferries Safety Office 1 Message Page 1 of 1 Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 4:32 PM To: 'niscor@wsdot.wa.gov' Subject: Edmonds Ferry Landing Overpass Rick: You contacted me regarding the staffed booth at the end of the pedestrian overpass before the walkover armature. I am familiar with the space in question. The structure was built following Fire Department review and State Building Code review, and meets applicable standards for fire- and life- safety for the Public and ferry workers alike. Life Safety Codes are established to provide a reasonable accommodation to public safety balancing risks, hazards and expense. Due to the proprietary, not -for -public use, and limited area for worker access no second exit is required from that booth. Booth workers are assumed to remain awake, aware and alert to their surroundings. An automatic sprinkler system is provided up to a point near the end of the structure. Water flowing in this system (created by a fire incident anywhere in the passageway) should provide a visual and audible alarm that a safety situation is occurring requiring self -rescue or rescue by Fire Department or others. I cannot recall if there is an alarm device in the booth. You might take a look for that and add a device as needed. We should be providing your employees every minute of oppurtunity for them to help themselves out of a problem. A two-way means to contact the dock or 9-1-1 such as a phone or intercom would be a recommendation also to any workers that may feel too far away from rescue. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance to you or your staff. John Westfall Edmonds Fire Marshal 425 771-0213. westfal I .ci.edmonds.wa.us 12/20/2002 DATE: MAY 301 2000 ALL PERSONNEL NOTICE F.D. 2000-070 SUBJECT: POST -INCIDENT ANALYSIS — 5-16-00 SUICIDE PLUNGE OFF EDMONDS FERRY DOCK The following report follows the format established in SOP 102.02, Post -Incident Analysis. Copies of this report are maintained in the Post -Incident Analysis file at Fire Administration. The review was at- tended by ten EFD members, five EPD members and a representative from the Port of Edmonds. Post -Incident Analysis Officer Captain Greg Lucas called the review to order at 1400 hours on May 25, 2000 at Station 17. APPENDIX B: POST -INCIDENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY 1. Address of Incident: 2. Number of Alarms 3. Incident Date 4. Dispatch Time 5. On -duty Shift 6. Incident Commander(s) 7. Date of Post -incident Review RESPONSE 8. Type of Alarm 9. Initial Dispatch State of Washington, Ferry Dock, Edmonds 1 May 16, 2000 22:12:29 A Captain Lucas (Fire); Sgt. Jones (Police) May 25, 2000 Potential Drowning, Dive Rescue E17, A16, E23, M17, C16, Edmonds Police, Dive Team F--M F.D. 2000-070 10. Additional Personnel B11, C19, BNRR, Port of Edmonds, Responded or Requested Washington Ferry Service, Washington State Patrol, Medical Examiner, Barge Service, Tow Service UNIQUE PROBLEMS 11. A vehicular suicide plunge off the Edmonds Ferry Dock is a rare occurrence, and although not necessarily a problem, it caused different agencies to work together toward a common end in a somewhat unfamiliar setting. Train traffic at the head of the dock. ON -SCENE ACTIONS (Fire) 12. Describe in brief strategy, tactics, and:action plan of the Incident Commander, Division Command- ers and other operating divisions, sectors, task forces, groups and/or individual resources Engine 17 arrived on scene and established Ferry Command. Initial goals were to secure the scene, ensure personnel safety and effect a surface rescue if possible. Staging was established at the entrance to the dock. An Edmonds Police Officer and Ferry worker reported a dark pick-up truck with an unknown number of occupants had sped past the ferry line of waiting vehicles, broken through the barrier and plunged off the ramp into the water. Both reported seeing what might be a head bobbing in the water for approxi- mately 30 seconds after the vehicle entered the water. The inbound ferry stopped approximately 500 yards from shore and deployed their rescue boat. Command diverted incoming Aid 16 to the Port of Edmonds where they deployed Marine 16 for a surface search of the area. SNOCOM contacted Bur- lington Northern and requested train traffic through the City be halted. BNRR was later allowed to re- sume normal operations. The inbound ferry was subsequently. diverted to Seattle, and the outbound passengers in the queue were directed to make other arrangements. Before departure, several waiting passengers provided statements to law enforcement. It turned out the pick-up had a single occupant whose comments to a relative had 40 minutes before the fatal plunge prompted a report to law en- forcement agencies who were looking for the vehicle and occupant. Engine 17 Captain Lucas joined with Edmonds Police Sergeant Jeff Jones early in a unified command effort. The scene was lit, PFDs were distributed, various responders scanned the water from the ramp and above while the ferry rescue boat and Marine 16 searched the area between and around the dol- phins and south of the dock. Law enforcement personnel walked the beach, pier, jetty and rocks south of the dock. Engine 23 was assigned Safety; Chief Tomberg. assisted Command and was later as- signed as the Public Information Officer. Medic 17 remained in Staging at the scene for approximately one hour. When the incident transitioned from rescue to recovery, primary Command passed to Ser- geant Jones. Fire units stood by on the ramp and in Marine 16 to support the Police Dive Team. Ma- rine 16 received the recovered body from the Dive Team and transported it to Medical Examiner at the Port of Edmonds. LESSONS LEARNED, OBSERVATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS 13. The professional organizations worked well together. The Fire and Police Incident Commanders functioned as a team. Fire supported the Police Dive Team throughout the effort. Port of Edmonds personnel assisted with the fueling boat and in other support activities. SNOCOM did a good job coordinating with Burlington Northern Railroad and the Washington Ferry System. F.D. 2000-070 Cooperation among responders from different agencies is critical to an effective procedural outcome. The ferry draft is approximately 13'; the body was recovered in 30' of water about 10' from the vehicle. The Marine 16 key is kept in the lock box near the main Port office. The water and weather were cooperative. Under harsher conditions, the work would have been more difficult. Having completed a successful procedural: operation will make it easier when the weather is less cooperative. The surface search from the water (ferry rescue boat, Marine 16), ferry dock (Edmonds Police and ferry workers), and south along the shore, jetty, pier and rocks (Edmonds Police) was rapid; the Dive Team located the body 42 minutes after entering the water. : Night scanning for a body in the water is best accomplished by rapid visual sweeps. During daylight, concentrating a fixed gaze works better. Divers require a thorough briefing before entering the water. The general dive operating procedure is to (1) plan the search, (2) conduct the search and locate the body, and (3) plan the retrieval. Marking the last known position with a drop bag is helpful for searchers. The ferry ramp was hydraulically lowered to water level allowing divers easy access to the water. The generally accepted time at which a rescue effort becomes a recovery effort is 60 minutes. Recovery of the body and vehicle under water is identical in its investigative procedures as an incident occurring on dry land. It is part of the crime scene. If an operation goes much beyond three hours, consideration should be given to requesting Support 7 to respond. The night vision scope (PD) and Thermal Imaging Camera (FD) may be useful in a similar situation in the future. Station 17A (Captain Lucas) will coordinate a night viewing drill with Edmonds Police to determine the applicability of these two devices in a night marine environment. Communications have to be improved between the divers and the support vessel. Police and Fire will schedule a training event to review communications procedures between divers and the support boat when the latter are in the water. AC Taylor is the contact. Police and Fire will schedule a Dive gear donning exercise using a checklist. AC Taylor is the contact. The Engine 17 crew anticipated Captain Lucas's. needs as the Fire -side Command Officer. Due to the unified Command structure, resources were effectively and efficiently deployed. The Marine 16 fuel tank was low on deployment and had to be filled, a task rapidly accomplished by Port personnel. {' 0'. , F.D. 2000-070 Marine 16: No lights, restricted work area, hard to maneuver, no anchor, no extra line to tie off al- though each of these problems were overcome. Had the water or weather been hostile, boat opera- tions would have to have been suspended. Common terminology for Ferry Dock structures such as dolphins, apron, ramp and wing walls assist in the communications between Fire, Police, Port and Ferry personnel. There are an insufficient number of personal flotation devices (PFDs) for responders who at any time may be required to be in the operational area. Heavily attired public safety responders should carry PFDs in their vehicles and don them when operating in a marine environment.. It would be convenient if the Port could identify a location to store Dive Team equipment for rapid access. The Fire Incident Commander recorded significant times; they should also be announced to SNOCOM for recording purposes. Ferry officials oppose the tow truck and cable operation for vehicle recovery. The Washington Ferry System paid for the barge brought in the following morning to recover the vehicle. A ferry will not berth until the vehicle is removed. Placing the body into a body bag underwater and the sensitivity with which the body was recovered, packaged and transported to the Medical Examiner at the Port was dignified and professional. Port Security did a good job of maintaining a privacy perimeter when the body was transferred. INCIDENT ORGANIZATION CHART 14. Provide a Command organizational chart and other incident worksheets. N/A. EMERGENCY INCIDENT DRAWING 15. Attach a drawing of the emergency scene reflecting implementation of the strategy, tactics and incident action plan A timeline and schematic are enclosed. Thomas J. T mb rg Fire Chief Pull Date: 12/31/00 C: Police Department Port of Edmonds Time Line 2211 Call received 2212 Call dispatched 2214 Responding 2217 On Scene, established command 2219 Aid 16 to Port Boat to begin search 2310 Divers in water 2352 Body Found 0127 Divers reenter for:investigation and recovery 0147 Body recovered 0155 All Divers out of water 0219 Body in ME vehicle CAAS we K Nib' A DiVl' j-A L dV U � U I� I ILI 1 IKA 1 L_ ^Q LL J l3.1SC Nam, •r 4 S IjyO _ ly City of edmonds ire Oepeirtment CC�vE� 'Date LNumber of pages (including cover): D Edmonds Aro Department 121-5tb cAvenue LPortb Edmonds, W04 98020 fjbone: (425)771-0215 max `Number "Cax: (425) 775-7721 Message: A: Word/Fomisll O9/19/98be MEMORANDUM 6/ 17/99 Paul Martin, Agent, Edmonds Ferry Terminal From: Mike Smith, Fire Inspector Subject: Fire Alarm Requirement Per our recent conversation, the Fire Department requires a strobe tied into the Fire Alarm be placed in the ramp operator's booth at the end of the new foot passenger terminal. When the door to the booth is shut, the hydraulic motors for the hoist running, and the operator facing north, he/she can not see or hear the fire alarm from inside the booth. The Fire Alarm Strobe should be placed on the control panel where it will be visible. If you have any questions, please contact me. Cc Roger Wilson City of Edmonds Fire Department s Date: 4/6/99 To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM Paul Martin, Agent, Edmonds Ferry Terminal Mike Smith, Fire inspector Automatic Fire Alarms at new Foot Passenger Terminal Regarding our conversation about Fire Alarms at the Passenger Terminal, the Fire Department has the following recommendations: 1) When the Fire Alarm activates, an off site monitoring company automatically calls the Fire Department. Please do not reset or silence the alarm. The audible portion tells all involved to get out and stay out of the building until the FD has arrived and taken care of the problem. 2) It is suggested you instruct your employees to assist in evacuating the building. Passengers may need assistance in locating the closest exit. Passengers and employees should remain outside the building at a safe distance and not re-enter until directed to do so by the FD. 3) If possible, have an employee contact the FD on our arrival to provide any known information regarding the Alarm. 4) A horn/strobe needs to be placed in the ramp operators control booth at the end of the dock. The nearest fire alarm device is behind the ramp operator when they are at the controls. The noise level in the booth when the ramp is being raised/lowered warrants a device there. 5) Any other policies or procedures the WA St Ferries have regarding Fire Alarms at Ferry Terminals should be followed. If you have any questions or I can be of any assistance to you please call me. Thanks City of Edmonds Fire Department 1 Westfall, John 71 MA-141 S 7 From: Horner, Shannon Sent: Thursday, September 16, 1999 9:32 AM To: Westfall, John Cc: Smith, Mike Subject: "CONCERNED CITIZEN MAKING A COMPLAINT' Sirs, A very angry man phoned this morning regarding a complaint about the Ferry Terminal. He stated there are paint cans, paint thinners, etc. being stored under the passenger terminal. He stated that I needed to ensure this was taken care of! I told him that I did not know the process of this kind of situation and I could have someone call him back with the specifics if he wanted. He got quite angry and sternly told me, "I a concerned citizen! and will not leave my name and just tell JOHN WESTFAL OR MIKE SMITH111." I told him, "O.K. and I will give them the message." However I did warn him that I cannot make any promises of the out come because I am not in a position to do so. I could only ensure I would tell you two, and he was welcome to call back if he wanted to. Shannon C cao AT; fix: - 0&1- o t off- 1 HEAD BOX W I•TH -200mm ELEC.• BELL ,•:: HEADS & WRENCH POTTER PS-10 PRESSURE SWITCH. s..;' POTTER PS-40 PRESSURE SWITCH 04 TO TRANSFER SPAN 13 .65mm CENTRAL MOD AF ?.: ..::.DRY. PIPE VA . (TO=305mm) WITH TRIM (FxF) 65mm CENTRAL GG CHECK VALVE#90 (T0=2@3mT)E N a co '4LCB-21-M4@@X 1 /2H . P . GAST AIR COMPRESSOR (11mv.) (R-ISER MOUNTED) � ELn a X 6 mm VIC TEE (O N L.� - mmx 5 mm MAIN DRAIN PIPE OUTSIDF 15 1 1 524 65mm AMES 2000SS SILVER BULLET//A) BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITH (2) POTTER MOD. OSYSU-A TAMPER SWITCHES(TO=965mm) l(D0mmxl78 FxG PIPE STAND 17 11 Imon0i Tw A -all 3SOMM'sm "TO DOMESTIC 100mm VIC FLG - —1 mmmm xl 5©mm FG GALV 1 @Omm x 65mm VIC COUP 1 0Omm 1 8 ff 1 mmmm VIC TEE Vic COUP lmmmm GALV Stamm UNDER -GROUND D.I BY OTHERS ° I - a 0 V V� CALCS: LIGHT HAZARD 4 . 075 LPM/1 81 M. CENTRAL ELO-16 GB FR ECLH 6.lx6.1=151.4 LPM AT .896 BAR SYSTEM DEMAND AT FLOOR= 561.3 LPM AT 6.431 BAR SYSTEM DEMAND AT STREET= 939.3 LPM AT 6.667 BAR C=120, K=80.1, 158.7 NEW PIPE= SCH.40 SEE CALCS "C2358A" I nA^. r r( C Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM 6/17/99 Paul Martin, Agent, Edmonds Ferry Terminal Mike Smith, Fire Inspector Fire Alarm Requirement --? / /t, Ar, h, s[- Per our recent conversation, the Fire Department requires a strobe tied into the Fire Alarm be placed in the ramp operator's booth at the end of the new foot passenger terminal. When the door to the booth is shut, the hydraulic motors for the hoist running, and the operator facing north, he/she can not see or hear the fire alarm from inside the booth. The Fire Alarm Strobe should be placed on the control panel where it will be visible. If you have any questions, please contact me. Cc Roger Wilson City of Edmonds Fire Department Date: 4/6/99 To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM Paul Martin, Agent, Edmonds Ferry Terminal Mike Smith, Fire inspector Automatic Fire Alarms at new Foot Passenger Terminal Regarding our conversation about Fire Alarms at the Passenger Terminal, the Fire Department has the following recommendations: 1) When the Fire Alarm activates, an off site monitoring company automatically calls the Fire Department. Please do not reset or silence the alarm. The audible portion tells all involved to get out and stay out of the building until the FD has arrived and taken care of the problem. 2) It is suggested you instruct your employees to assist in evacuating the building. Passengers may need assistance in locating the closest exit. Passengers and employees should remain outside the building at a safe distance and not re-enter until directed to do so by the FD. 3) If possible, have an employee contact the FD on our arrival to provide any known information regarding the Alarm. 4) A horn/strobe needs to be placed in the ramp operators control booth at the end of the dock. The nearest fire alarm device is behind the ramp operator when they are at the controls. The noise level in the booth when the ramp is being raised/lowered warrants a device there. 5) Any other policies or procedures the WA St Ferries have regarding Fire Alarms at Ferry Terminals should be followed. If you have any questions or I can be of any assistance to you please call me. Thanks � /- City of Edmonds Fire Department FEB-25-99 THU 11:06 AMS FAX NO. 2063644136 P.01 2J15J99 ALARM NONITDRINO SERVICE, INC. DETAILED ACCOUNT ACTIVITY PRINTOUI(222) INST 0 TO 999999199 ACCTS 210711 TO 210711 02(25J99 TVROU&N 02J25(99 128 (GS) GUARDIAN SECURITY EVT DATE EVT TINE OPER EVENT(CONNENT CS ACCT: 210111 WASH. ST. DEPT. OF TRANS. ALT I0: (EONONDS TERNINAL) 71 NAIR STREET EDNONDS WA "020 100-843-3779 02125/95 11s02:52 CONVENT: LAS:OON KET2 WJCS 02/25199 11:02:52 LAS 4211 --= CLEAR TEST 02/25159 11:02:52 CONNINT: TEST:All 02/25/99 11:02t62 CONVENT: LAST SET:022599 105300 02126J99 11:02:01 I 2006 restore IT 02J25J99 11:01:62 2 1250 :TRDU8IE :EW IT .02125/99 11:0005 2 2000 restore IT 02J25199 11:80:20 1 1325 AFIRE :f IT 02125199 10:69;10 1 2006 restore IT 02125199 10:50:55 2 1260 tTROUBLE :EW IT 02125199 10:58:55 1 1325 AFIRE :F IT 02J25J99 10:55:37 CONVENT: 02125199 10:54:35 2 1250 :TROUBLE :EW IT -02125199 10:M m 2 2050 restore IT 02126199 10:53:00 CONVENT: AAN:OON KETI WJCS} 02/25/99 10:53:00 AAN 4210 ea PLACE ON TEST == CAT: I 021251,99 18:53:00 CONVENT: 022599 1053 022599 1200 02(25199 10:53:00 CONVENT: TEM AIL END OF REPORT Ate: Jotin Npslfall PAGE I !. / SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE 13-75 Contractor's Material and Test Certificate for Aboveground Piping PROCEDURE Upon completion of work, inspection and tests shall be made by the contractor's representative and witnessed by an owner's representative. All defects shall be corrected and system left In service before contractor's personnel finally leave the job. A certificate shall be filled out and signed by both representatives. Copies shall be prepared for approving authorities, owners, and contractor. It is understood the owner's representative's signature in no way prejudices any claim against contractor for faulty material, poor workmanship, or failure to comply with approving authority's requirements or local ordinances. PROPERTY NAME J0M OS DATE C:PI-/ Je PROPERTYADDRESS /Ojqg ACCEPTED BY APPROVING AUTHORITIES (NAMES) • ADDRESS � � 1 PLANS INSTALLATION CONFORMS TO ACCEPTED PLANS YES ❑ NO EQUIPMENT USED IS APPROVED YES ❑ NO IF NO, EXPLAIN DEVIATIONS T C1 go 's--s.', HAS PERSON IN CHARGE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT BEEN INSTRUCTED AS YES ❑ NO TO LOCATION OF CONTROL VALVES AND CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF THIS NEW EQUIPMENT? IF NO, EXPLAIN �E-1�14iI,L6, J!:i&O-L. �1 P7"A7�r�C INSTRUCTIONS HAVE COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING BEEN LEFT ON THE PREMISES? ❑ YES NO 1. SYSTEM COMPONENTS INSTRUCTIONS /❑ YES NO 2. CARE AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS f Vf• ❑ YES NO 3. NFPA25 Ge/�! �-%/`4 ❑ YES NO LOCATION SUPPLIES BUILDINGS ,(� j �' I IBLC; OF SYSTEM ��'M J6,- V`'#7 �WA� r / YEAR OF ORIFICE TEMPERATURE MAKE MODEL MANUFACTURE SIZE QUANTITY RATING 2. S PRINKLER " v r� /utf A'� Lo -I C�+i3 D SS'o P PE AND Type of Pipe �'�- ��4O 13(-k Type of Fittings LO h^ , Qh W-OL_ FITTINGS MAXIMUM TIME TO OPERATE ALARM ALARM DEVICE THROUGH TEST CONNECTION VALVE OR FLOW TYPE MAKE MODEL MIN SEC INDICATOR J T DRY VALVE 0. 0. D. MAKE MODEL SERIAL NO. MAKE SERIAL NO. DRY PIPE TIME TO TRIP ? TIME WATER ALARM OPERATING THROUGH TEST WATER AIR TRIP POINT REACHED OPERATED TEST CONNECTIONI PRESSURE PRESSURE AIR PRESSURE TEST OUTLET' PROPERLY MIN SEC PSI PSI PSI MIN SEC YES I NO Without O.O.D. O l �{ I `"1 With . D. 0.0 _ IF NO, EXPLAIN 1MEASURED FROM TIME INSPECTOR'S TEST CONNECTION IS OPENED. Figure 8.1(a) Part 1. P5 1996 Edition 13-76 INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER SYSTEMS OPERATION ❑ PNEUMATIC Q ELECTRIC ❑ HYDRAULIC PIPING SUPERVISED Q YES ❑ NO DETECTING MEDIA SUPERVISED ❑ YES O' S VALVE OPERATE FROM THE MANUAL TRIP, REMOTE, OR BOTH ES ❑ NO DELUGE AND CON STATIONS PREACTION IS THERE AN SIBLE FACILITY IN EACH CIRCUIT IF XPLAIN VALVES FORT STIN ❑ YES 0 MAKE MODEL DOES EACH CIRCUI TE SUPERVISION L LARM DOES EACH CIRCUIT OPERATE VALVE RELEASE? MAXIMUM TIME TO OPERATE RELEASE Y NO NO I MIN SEC LOCATIO AKE & SETTING STATIC PRESSURE RESIDUAL PRE FLOW RATE PRESSURE & R MODEL (FLOWING) A`DUCIN T INLET (PSI) OUTLET (PSI) INLET (PSI) OUTLET (PSI) FLOW (GP HYDROSTATIC: Hydrostatic tests shall be made at not less than 200 psi (13.6 bars) for 2 hours or 50 psi (3.4 bars) above static pressure in excess of 150 psi (10.2 bars) for 2 hours. Differential dry -pipe valve clappers shall be left TEST open during the test to prevent damage. All aboveground piping leakage shall be stopped. DESCRIPTION PNEUMATIC: Establish 40 psi (2.7 bars) air pressure and measure drop, which shall not exceed 11h psi (0.1 bars) in 24 hours. Test pressure tanks at normal water level and air pressure and measure air pressure drop, which shall not exceed 1 1h psi (0.1 bars) in 24 hours. ALL PIPING HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT—_ PSI (_ BARS) FOR — HRS IF NO, STATE REASON DRY PIPING PNEUMATICALLY TESTED YES ❑ NO EQUIPMENT OPERATES PROPERLY YES ❑ NO DO YOU CERTIFY AS THE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR THAT ADDITIVES AND CORROSIVE CHEMICALS, SODIUM SILICATE OR DERIVATIVES OF SODIUM SILICATE, BRINE, OR OTHER CORROSIVE CHEMICALS WERE NOT USED FOR TESTING SYSTEMS OR STOPPING LEAKS? YES ❑ NO TESTS DRAIN READING OF GAUGE LOCATED R WATER RESIDUAL PRESSURE WITH V LVE IN TEST TEST 1N�E� SUPPLY TEST CONNECTION: � PSI (_BARS) CONNECTION OPEN WIDE: PSI (_BARS) UNDERGROUND MAINS AND LEAD IN CONNECTIONS TO SYSTEM RISERS FLUSHED BEFORE CONNECTION MADE TO SPRINKLER PIPING VERIFIED BY COPY OF THE U FORM NO. 85B YES ❑ NO OTHER EIN FLUSHED BY INSTALLER OF UNDER- GROUND SPRINKLER PIPINGYES Q �7z& NO .S— IF POWDER -DRIVEN FASTENERS ARE USED IN ❑ YES NO IF NO, EXPLAIN CONCRETE, HAS REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE TESTING BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED? BLANK TESTING NUMBER USED LOCATIONS NUMBER FIEMOVED GASKETS WELDED PIPING YES Q NO IF YES... DO YOU CERTIFY AS THE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR THAT WELDING PROCEDURES COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF AT LEAST YES ❑ AWS D10.9, LEVELAR-31 �� )� NO WELDING DO YOU CERTIFY THAT THE WELDING WAS PERFORMED BY WELDERS QUALIFIED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF AT LEAST n' j,� YES NO AWS D10.9, LEVELAR•31 DO YOU CERTIFY THAT WELDING WAS CARRIED OUT IN COMPLIANCE WITH A DOCUMENTED QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE TO ENSURE THAT ALL DISCS ARE RETRIEVED, THAT OPENINGS IN PIPING ARE 11 YES ❑ NO SMOOTH, THAT SLAG AND OTHER WELDING RESIDUE ARE REMOVED, AND THAT THE INTERNAL DIAMETERS OF PIPING ARE NOT PENETRATED? CUTOUTS DO YOU CERTIFY THAT YOU HAVE A CONTROL FEATURE TO YES Q NO (DISCS) ENSURE THAT ALL CUTOUTS (DISCS) ARE RETRIEVED? Ile Figure 8-1(a) Part 2. 5� 44 . 1996 Edition i 13-77 .. .rd i. fi��31';ti''1>-t'), P_4�•#.a +!f_7-Fi, {[�jriR !:.� - - - i`: .;j';SKs:i,e SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE HYDRAULIC DATA NAMEPLATE NAMEPLATE PROVIDED YES Q NO IF NO, EXPLAIN REMARKS DATE LEFT IN SERVICE WITH ALL CONTROL VALVES OPEN . ?�) )Iqq ' 0. NAME OF SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR r S T�fi SIGNATURES TESTS WITNESSED B 67-RO o yy ' R P TY SIGNED) TITLE DATE P-tq-s FOR INK L 0 C (AG) ITLE D DATE ADDITIONAL EXPLAN TION AND NOTES l4r PA �. s o IeM aiaWA w w � • February 11, 1999 Mr. Randy Porcher Fire Shield Inc. Fax: (253) 931-9782 Re: Central model A Accelerator Dear Mr, Porcher: RECE DYED F E B 1 1 1999 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Thank you for your interest in Central Sprinkler products. I am writing in response to our recent telephone conversation regarding the Central model A Accelerator. Currently Central Sprinkler Company only manufactures and has listings for the model A Accelerator and trim assembly for use with the Central 3", 4" and 6" dry pipe valves. There is currently no Accelerator and trim assembly listed to be used with the Central 2" and 21/2" dry pipe valves. Please call should you have any further questions. Sincerely, Ben Figuei Technical Services v cc: Kevin Maughan- Director of Technical Services, CSC Dan Wolfe- general Construction Company Fax: (425) 712-0967 Central Sprinkler Corporation 451 North Cannon Avenue, Lansdale, Pennsylvania 19446 (215) 362-0700 (800) 523-651.2 FAX: (215) 362-5385 Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM August 25, 1998 Building Department John Westfall, Acting Fire Marshal Plan Check #98-248: Edmonds Ferry Terminal 71 W. Main St. Sprinkler and Alarm Plans The Fire Department has the following comments upon sprinkler plans: 1. Larry Glenn of Washington State Patrol Fire Protection Bureau has verified to me that Shawn Barnett has applied for, and WSP will issue a Washington State Sprinkler design competency stamp for sprinkler design. RCw 18.160.040 (see attached letter) 2. Provide corrosion resistant dry sprinkler heads in walkways and exterior locaions. UBC Standard 9-1 1-4.5.3 The Fire Department has the following comments upon alarm plans: 3. Annunciator shall be located to permit viewing from exterior of terminal building. 97UFC1007.3.3.7 4. Fire Alarm shall be moniotored by an approved central, proprietary or remote station service or a local alarm which gives audible and visual signals at a constantly attended location. 97UFC1007.3.3.6.1 7 71 -306y Cc: File -' , 2 0 � � City of Edmonds 3o Office of Fire Marshal ci:wGENERAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Edmonds Ferry Terminal EDMONDS OVERHEAD LOADING PROJECT #6552 Overhead Loading and 211 Railroad Street FAX: 425-712-0967 Terminal Building Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: 425-712-0511 Contract No. 00-5257 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Date: 5/26/98 RFI # 222 Subject: Fire Sprinkler Peres in Pavilions Response Needed By: June 5, 1998 Drawing No. P 1.2 Section/Detail 1 Spec. Ref. No. n/a QUESTION/PROBLEM: A note on the Plumbing drawings indicates the intention of locating the fire sprinkler piping between the metal decking and the gyp board. This, however, is not possible since the pipe in this area is 50mm ID (2"), which would require at least 3" for fittings, and is more than the 1-1 /2" between the decking and the gyp board. The sprinkler pipes in this area will be exposed to view, painted and located along the roof members. UK BY: DATE: Dan Wolf, Iield Engineer REPLY/SOLUTION: 1 3 q_-�.� BY 1-%,4^rG6-1—s Af f gcv6d ? DATE: Engineer/Designer / Consultant f 7 ( w�.-4��✓, t .w r.•c rse�ffN 4{ 1�wee4''a ,,_. tu:Y DIYy. fA 9 tdl st+ t{ t, �yfaas Efong" FAX TRANSMITTAL Planners Seattle Office: 777--108l1 Avenue N.E. Bdllewe, WA 98009.2050 " ~ EC0n0Irf TEL (206)453-5000 FAX (206) 462-5957 Sclenf ifs C M Car W. (206)4535006, e)t5246 Fax #: 111 - 020 11` Verification #: 11 I -m21 S Total Pages: 9 To: Irrtn Wln%imo^ From: 414061" Wollcor Company: Ed aian di i=ire DILP114-n.40t" Date: 0 12Z pl(. Message: (R �pltdld Pdcl affx*11-4 7 & AjCrf101'larnt af�.d( t1out> �� 'kc, +"* Ioro pok#4 ► 4fj -4Nr,it urnan is • As :r Ctilpl.:.ed� �� o..r rt+o,.� Gi.+uevt�fida7 x //11 A��% Mo�✓,�n9iArt4C'O 40 deiCld-bd 06.j 4?.C- {tie 1 LA (064 ►F }•rtft l.+o.t a �ii( ai' }l+a GveG( Oi ei4lvv �/� ira p��pof*� (:cis pros rNeoLG pore 4(.r t'. d n4re 6`hwCA- uu o.,d 9UG Cr. E 10N� ehd do r,,,r bout- eNw S4^C1 �+re �p•v-4 . `p4ose Carr C�eIL [C2oG1 tisS-6ueo] awol (i4. rFe lc aou Mocr t�rI A -IC CALOD.r ilAf►♦ WO--(Vl ZWd df +j, J. C V: j f.,us. 1 Y {ho�tLi� the Information In this fax is confidential and proprietary and Is intended only for the (nd(vidual or entity named on the cootvar Sher f you are not the Intended recipient, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information Is prohibited. It you do nrecei , ill of the pages or have received this fax in error, please notify us immediately at the above telephone number. T0'd 6££ti WdBO:£ %6T 'ZZ -nf a WOTLL :01. -1l1 H WZHJ : W021d MID WATERFRONT ALTERNATU L a m M M U F m M m m N N J I In m m m N r 0 J J N U E O It LL Or _,IRM G� IMPA 00 PIII ;.,, Figure 11: Mid %Vaterfront Aerial View Looking Northeast The Mid Waterfront site is located approximately halfway between Main Street and the Point Edwards site. As shown in Figure Q. the realignment of SR-104 from its current intersection with Pine Street would provide access to the site. The realigned SR-104 would carry two westbound general-purpose lanes and one westbound HOV lane until it crosses the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. After crossing the tracks, the roadway would descend to ground level, run parallel to the tracks, and lead to the ferry ticket booths. A left -turn lane would be provided for secondary access to the watedtont. Beyond the ticket booths, six general-purpose lanes and one HOV lane would be used for staging of up to 450 vehicles. The three -slip ferry pier would extend roughly 700 feet from what is now Sunset Park into Now Sound immediately jacent to the Port of Edmonds' northern breakwater. Two eastbound lanes along the realigned SR- 104 would carry off-loading vehicles. The Multimodal Transportation Center in this alternative would be located adjacent to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks north of Dayton Street, west of Edmonds Way, and south of lames Street. The train station would have two loading platforms. Buses would approach the facility from either Dayton or lames Streets and unload passengers adjacent to the railroad platform. ga�o�ns<��rcRossikc r) m a Cr) r) r) xt r7 W In m t11 rV ti Taxi and automobile loading would be accommodated in a drop-off area adjacent to Dayton Street. Commuter parking would be provided in a two -level, 490-space garage at the facility's southeast corner. The ground level of the garage would provide short-term parking and 49,000 square feet of retail commercial space with access from Edmonds Way. The terminal building would be directly linked to the Nferry slips by an overhead pedestrian walkway. The m distance between the terminal building and the ferry r passenger waiting area at the end of the pier would be roughly 1,100 feet, which is an approximate 5-minute wall;. To facilitate traffic movement along Dayton Street, access to the Port of Edmonds, and other waterfront uses, Dayton Street would be reconstructed to pass under the railroad tracks and the ferry staging/ eeress roadway, and then connect to a realigned Admiral Way. In addition, Railroad Avenue would become a cul-de-sac, ending north of its current terminus at Dayton Street. J N S U O Of 11 -4 SQ.UND NOW • • WM . •. *� Mebn. f j � F9RY x r S � � 66 .POi�lllpYt walkwvX. taffra jg t� ,er r ! , Ssf - �Y Y'y Terminot PloNoi+n _'1�_, �•.'; r'iC{� T i_`1w1 �� _�4_T.i�.2� � V^�w•` � � + •� ISdi'.C. y ng Fee r Figure 12: Mid Waterfront Concept 1 HVILTIMODAL TR:ti1SPORTAT101 CEITER m ri rn M M U E a M t.0. m m N N J m N m r 0 F- J _J S s i v E 0 X LL IMNAM NTAT 10 Funding a major investment in transporation facilities, The ultimate Edmonds Crossing facility, while complete In addition to fulfilling the requirements listed above, such as the Edmonds Crossing project, requires in function, will be expensive to build. The price tag in the design and implementation plan must minimize any committment, innovation, vision, and fortitude. The full 1995 dollars exceeds $130 million, which in today's ''Throwaway" costs associated with the phasing. To project must also be broken'down into many phases so funding climate is unrealistic to build all at once. A more address these concerns, two phased plans for get th ro-t so key nieces implementing ferry service at Point Edwards are that project funding can occur over a number of bud cycles. The phased, individual projects need to each build toward the final vision, with as little unnecessary cost and "throw away" construction as possible, The initial construction at Point Edwards must include a significant portion of the facilities to allow all critical operations to be transferred from the present terminal to the new site. Construction must be integrated with the realistic approach IS to structure e p that fit into the ultimate plan are constructed over time. This approach will satisfy the immediate goal of moving the ferry operations from downtown Edmonds while providing a foundation for the future. For the first phase in the relocation of the ferry terminal, a reasonable facility that satisfies the operational requirements of Washington State Ferries will be needed. The minimum UNOCAL site cleanup to minimize costs, avoid dalays, facility requirements are listed below: and ensure user safety. Once operations have been transferred to the new Edmonds Crossing facilities at Point Edwards, improvements can be scheduled as travel demands increase and additional funding becomes available. The following sections define alternative ways to begin the project through an initial set of improvements. • Grade separation with railroad • Two new landing slips protected with a breakwater and oriented to provide all-weather service • Bus facility for at least two buses • Rail passenger platform • Parking for commuters and overnight vehicles • A pier structure with at least six lanes, composed of The following, - 2 boarding lanes - I HOV/bypass lane - 1 shuttle lane - 2 exit lanes • Area for ferry ticketing and restrooms presented on the following pages. In both cases, implementation should begin with acquisition of the property for the facility from UNOCAL. A budget of SS million should be sufficient to fund the necessary appraisals, negotiations, and property purchase. Property acquisition will take as much as a year to accomplish, given the complex issues involved with the contamination at this site, coordination of cleanup, and the difficulty of establishing a market value. During 1996, additional funding for construction needs to be sought from a number of sources. Potential sources of funds include a variety of Federal transportation grants, Washington State funding programs, and revenue -supported bonds. IVith the completion of the initial startup facilities, additional stages will need to be defined based upon travel demands and the availability of funds. GDMMS:11 CR SIRC 1 i Cl) M M U r1) m m N N ti 0 J J N U IE LL MMMIMMMMM In Plan A. the ultimate road access from SR-104 to the toll plaza will be built (see Figure 26). From the toll plaza down to the end of the ferry dock, the roadway structure will be reduced in width from the final design, consisting of three storage hires plus an HOV bypass' lane. The three lames will provide enough space for ticketed vehicles to fill a Jumbo class ferry while the HOVlbypass lane will ensure preferential loading for HOVs. The total vehicle holding capacity will be 255 vehicles; queuing lanes prior to the toll plaza will provide off -highway storage space for an additional 190 vehicles. Only two slips will be constructed initially (Slips 2 and 3), with ultimate plans for a third slip (Slip 1). The Overhead loading bridge will be relocated from Main Street to serve Slip 2. Landings at Slip 3 %rill be infrequent enough that overhead loading will not be essential in the first phase. The layout of Slip 3 will allow overhead loading to be added as funds become available. in the first phase. In its place, a two=ended shuttle bus (like those used in airports) will be deployed in a separate lane on the roadway structure. The shuttle will cost $900,000 and will carry up to 120 passengers per trip, it will be accessed on the shore side of the facility by stairs and by an elevator from the bus and parking area to the north of the holding lanes. Another set of stairs with an elevator will be built at the end of the ferry dock for access to the overhead waiting area. in order for a facility to function at Point Edwards, it is considered essential that a mechanized form of pedestrian transport be available. Because the proposed people - mover will cost over $18 million, it has not been included A mul6modal terminal facility for this plan will be minimal because adequate funds might not be initially available. In the first phase, the existing lower yard at the UNOCAL site may simply be restriped for a transit Stop and parking. A simple, covered shelter will be available for transit riders. A.smail terminal building will be constructed at the top of the stairs adjacent to the holding area to serve walk-on passengers as well as riders waiting in the holding area. It will have restrooms, ticket booths, and a small waiting area. Walk-on passengers will board the shuttle at the terminal building for a quick trip down to the overhead waiting area at the end of the dock. This facility will also be a likely location for the terminal operations personnel work space. y "Or�d'Me4�iodif0�� _ aw P U G trlbvObt A SIdK ` POWD Mom Pkt ' re . 1 p HO time Pk* 3 ttcl�Inp 8 Resboorns L woucwoy Reel Fkffw rix r"ryn ! V /Rya .. FWnt 26: Flan A IG 1?� l„c .�, �C,;n t cd c:C vz{ S :� r MULT1HODAL TRANSPORTATION CENTER m 19 a- m r" I Ih U a r-r m N m N r 0 F- MMMMMMMM� In an effort to further lower the cost of project implementation, Plan B was developed to use the existing graded and paved surface in the lower yard at the UNOCAL site (see Figure 27). Because of the iarroe area already prepared for traffic, the expensive cut, fill, and retaining wall sections required in Plan A could be deferred until funds are available. In Plan B, the vehicle holding area will consist of 12 lanes that can hold more than 40 vehicles each, for a total holding capacity of 500 vehicles. In addition, the roadway structure will be constructed with two holding lanes and an HOVIbypass lane. The two holding lanes on the structure. will store another 100 vehicles, bringing the total holding capacity to 600 vehicles. The queuing lanes will provide additional off -highway storage of 100 vehicles. Access to the structure will be via the temporary ramp. This ramp will have two reversible lanes to accommodate both unloading and loading_ traffic, along with a separate lane for the double -ended shuttle bus. As with Plan A, only two slips will be constructed during Phase l of Plan B, which would be Slips'—) and 3, as shown in Figure 25. A multimodal terminal facility for this plan will be a minimal structure, probably open with separate restrooms and ticket booths for ferries, buses, and trains under a single canopy or series of covered walkways. Pedestrian access to ferries will be via the shuttle bus located at the foot of the temporary ramp. Passengers aboard the shuttle bus will ride out to the end of the ferry dock in a designated lane on the temporary ramp and roadway structure. At the end of the dock, passengers will board the ferry via due overhead loading walkways, as described for Plan A above. Access to the bus and train will be by foot under the covered walkways. Ft 27: Ptah B 10 12X I40D �� Zi0 F-6t.I&vCfst 7L RD101DS o>'CROSS110 July 23, 1996 rw Ms. Nytasha Walters . (; „ 0S 3 CH2M Hill L 777 108th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, WA 98009-2050 Ref: Proposed Ferry Terminals and Fire Department Emergency Response Dear Ms. Walters: Assistant Chief Whitman passed to me your questions regarding the Edmonds Fire Department "handling emergencies" and fires on the seaward end of proposed ferry terminal. I was originally reluctant to comment without more definitive information regarding the project, i.e. pier construction features, fire protection systems, water supply, type of emergency, wind direction, ... An aversion to "What if...?" gave in to my intrigue for the question and speculation of an answer. Allow me first to make some reasonable assumptions regarding the features of the terminal itself. - As your proposal becomes a plan, I hope you will keep in mind fire protection requirements for the pier. Standards for life and property safety in construction call for 1) a second, separate means to travel to shore for piers over 150', or that 2) combustible substructure and superstructure would be fully sprinklered. Fire protection systems and features for all structures aid the fire department in minimizing life, property and environmental casualties by enabling early warning, providing automatic suppression of fires, or both. Without construction plans, I cannot today determine how the terminal would be protected. A standpipe system would be provided. This is essentially a rigid firehose installed the entire length of the pier, with outlets spaced along its length. Firefighters carry flexible hose to an outlet, hook-up, then fight fire. This is very effective for fighting boat or car fires and would be employed upon the entire pier waiting lanes, or to assist ferry brigades in ferry fires. The Port moorage docks are currently so equipped. This has enabled the Fire Department to minimize potentially devastating incidents in the last few years, by providing direct access to the moored craft. The Fire Department is only equipped at this time for land -based fire -fighting operations. Our small rigid -hull "rescue boat" is strictly that. Boat fires afloat are deferred to the Coast Guard for fire suppression. Although you are not proposing a dedicated "emergency lane" for firefighting vehicles, an assumption may be made that an "offload" lane(s) will be clear the entire length of the pier for the ferry to unload prior to accepting Kingston -bound traffic. The reality is, as exists currently at Main Street, that the pier shall be so provided to accept fire- fighting apparatus its entire length the majority of the time. The State ferries employ fire brigades for initial fire response while underway. I am not sure if their procedures would include docking for land -based assistance while on fire. Our greatest concern would be in moving ferry customers to safety. Sincerely, John J. Westfall Senior Inspector SPECIAL STRUCTURES AND HIGH RISE BUILDINGS 101-223 SECTION 30-2 MEANS OF EGRESS REQUIREMENTS 30-2.1 General. Every required means of egress shall be 'in accordance with the applicable portions of Chapter 5. 30-2:2* Means of Egress Components. 30-2.2.1 Components of means of egress shall be limited to the types permitted for the occupancy by the applicable portions of Chapters 8 through 29, except as modified by this section. 30-2.2.2 Fire Escape Ladders: Towers and open structures, such as a forest fire observation or railroad signal tower, that are designed for occupancy by not, more than three persons employed therein shall be permitted to be served' by ladders complying with 5-2.9 instead of stairs. 30-23 Capacity of Means of Egress. The width and capacity Iof a`means of egress shall be in accordance with Chapter 5 and the applicable occupancy chapter. Exception No. 1: The means of egress for towers shall be pro- vided for the persons expected to occupy the space. Exception No. 2: Open structures. Exception No. 3: Spaces not subject to human 'occupancy because of machinery or equipment shall be excluded from con- sideration. 30-2.4 Number of Means of Egress., The minimum number of means of egress shall be in accordance with Section 5-4 and the applicable occupancy chapter. Exception No. 1: Piers used exclusively to moor cargo vessels and to store materials where provided with proper means of egress from structures thereon to the pier and a single means of access to the mainland as appropriate with the pier's arrangement. ling and storage shall have means of egress arranged in -dance with Chapters 8 through 29. (See 30-1.4.) In addi- one of the following measures shall be provided on piers (ding over 150 ft (45 m) from shore to minimize the possi- that fire under or on the pier might block escape of occu- to shore. a) The pier shall be arranged to provide two separate ways :ravel to shore, such as by two well -separated walkways or ependent structures, or b) The pier deck shall be open and fire resistive, set on (combustible supports, or c) The pier shall be open and unobstructed and shall be 1(15 m) or more in width if less than 500 ft (150 m) long,•or width shall be not less than 10 percent of its length if over ft (150 m) long, or d) The pier deck shall b rovided with automatic sprin- r protectionafor combusfible'subs`tructure and all super- 30-2.6 Travel Distance to Exits. Travel distance to exits shall be as regulated by Chapters 8 through 29 for the appro- priate occupancy. Exception No. 1: Where ladders are permitted in 30-2.2.2. Exception No. 2: Open structures. 30-2.7 Discharge from Exits. Discharge from exits -shall be in accordance with Section 5-7. Exception: Towers or other structures provided with one exit, as permitted by 30-2.4, shall be permitted to have 100 percent of the exit discharge through areas on the level of discharge. Exception No. 2: The grade level of open structures, which. by 30-2.8 Illumination of • Means of Egress. Illumination of their very nature contain an infinite number of means of egress. means of egress to the extent required by the applicable occu- Exception No. 3*: Towers shall be permitted to have a single pancy chapter shall be provided in accordance with Section 5-8. exit if the following conditions are met. (a) The tower is subject to occupancy by fewer than 25 persons. (b) , The tower is not used for living or sleeping purposes and is subject to occupancy by only able-bodied persons. (c) The tower is of Type I, Type II, or Type IV construction. (See 6-2.1.) . (d) The tower interior wall and ceiling finish is Class A or Class B. (e) The tower has no combustible materials in, under, or in the immediate vicinity, except necessary furniture. (}). There are no high hazard occupancies in the tower or immediate vicinity. Exception No. 4: Open structures occupied by not more than three people with travel distance to exit not more than 200 ft (60 m). 30-2.5 Arrangement of Means of Egress. 30-2.5.1 Means of egress shall be arranged in accordance with Section 5-5 and the applicable portions of the occupancy chapters. Exception No. 1: Open structures. Exception No. 2: Towers with ladders for exits as permitted by 30-2.2.2. 30-2.9 Emergency Lighting. Emergency lighting to the extent required by the applicable occupancy chapter shall be provided in accordance with Section 5-9. Exception No. 1: Open structures. Exception No. 2: Towers with ladders for exits as permitted by 30-2.2.2. Exception No. 3: Locations not routinely inhabited by humans. Exception No. 4: Structures occupied only during daylight hours, with windows arranged to provide the required level of illumination of all portions of the means of egress during these hours, upon special approval of the authority having jurisdiction. 30-2.10 Marking of Means of Egress. Signs designating exits or ways of travel thereto to the extent required by the applica- ble occupancy chapter shall be provided in accordance -with Section 5-10. 1994 EDITION 101-286 LIFE SAFETY CODE A-27-3.2.1 It is not the intent of this provision to require that rooms inside individual tenant spaces, used to store routine office supplies for that tenant, be separated or sprinklered. A-27-3.2.2 The requirement for separating high hazard con- tent areas from other parts of the building is intended to iso- late the hazard, and Exception No. 1 to 6-2.3.1 is applicable. A-27-4.2.2 In some cases, appreciable cost may be involved in bringing an existing occupancy into compliance. Where this is true, it would be appropriate for the authority having jurisdic- tion to prescribe a schedule determined jointly with the facil- ity, allowing suitable periods of time for the correction of the various deficiencies and giving due weight to the ability of the owner to secure the necessary funds. CHAPTER 28 A-28-1.4.1(c) High hazard occupancy may include occupan- cies where gasoline and other flammable liquids are handled, used, or stored under such conditions as to involve possible release of flammable vapors; where grain dust, wood flour or plastic dusts, aluminum or.magnesium dust, or other explosive dusts may be produced; where hazardous chemicals or explo- sives are manufactured, stored, or handled; where cotton or other combustible fibers are processed or handled under con- ditions such as to produce flammable flyings; and other situa- tions of similar hazard. Chapter 28, "Industrial Occupancies," and Chapter 29, "Storage Occupancies," include detailed provisions on high hazard occupancy. ti A-28-1.7 In most cases, the requirements for maximum travel. distance to exits will be the determining factor rather than num- bers of occupants, as exits provided to satisfy travel distance requirements will be sufficient to provide egress capacity for all occupants, except in of unusual arrangement of buildings or high occupant load of a general manufacturing occupancy. A-28-2.2.5.2 The customary building code requirement for fire doors on both sides of an opening in a fire wall may be met by having an automatic -sliding fire door on one side, and self -closing fire door swinging out from the other side -of the walla This arrangement qualifies only as a horizontal exit from the side of the sliding door. For further information, see A-5-2.4.3.8. A-28-2.6.2(b) Smoke and heating venting should be in accor- dance with NFPA 204M, Guide for Smoke and Heat Venting. I A-28-2.9 The authority having jurisdiction should review the ' facility and determine the," designated" stairs, aisles, corri- dors, ramps, and passageways that should be required to be provided with emergency lighting. In large locker rooms or lab- oratories using hazardous chemicals, for example, the author- ity having jurisdiction should determine that emergency light- ing is needed in the major aisles leading through those spaces. A-28-3.2 Emergency lighting should be considered where operations require lighting to perform orderly manual emer- gency operation or shutdown, maintain critical services, or provide safe start-up after a power failure. A-28-6 For further information on aircraft hangars, see NFPA 409, Standard on Aircraft Hangars. 1994 EDITION CHAPTER 29 A-29-1.7 There is no occupant load factor specified for stor- age occupancies. Rather, the actual probable maximum num- ber of persons present needs to be considered in determining the occupant load. A-29-2.2.5.2 The customary requirement of building codes for fire doors on both sides of an opening in a fire wall may be met by having an automatic -sliding fire door on one side and a self - closing fire door swinging out from the other side of the wall. This arrangement qualifies only as a horizontal exit from the side of the sliding door. For further information, see A-5-2.4.3.8. A-29-2.6 The travel distance to exits specified recognizes a low population density. Consideration should be given to locating areas that have a relatively high population, such as lunchrooms, meeting rooms, packaging areas, and offices near the outside wall of the building, to keep the travel distance to a minimum. A-29-6 For further information on aircraft hangars, see NFPA 409, Standard on Aircraft Hangars. A-29-7 For further information, see NFPA 6113, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Grain Elevators and Facilities Handling Bulk Raw Agricultural Commodities. The egress requirements for storage elevators are based on the pos- sibility of fire and Ate not based on the possibility of grain dust explosions. A-29-8.1.1 For further information on garages, including a definition of "open garage," see NFPA 88A, Standard for Parking Structures. CHAPTER 30 A-30-13.3 In determining openings in exterior walls, doors or access panels may be included. Windows may also be included if they are openable or provide a breakable glazed area. A-30-1.3.7.1(e) it is not the intent that these openings be readily openable from the exterior by the public, but that they can easily be opened with normal fire department equipment. A-30-1.3.7.2(e) It is not the intent that these openings be readily openable from the exterior by the public, but that they can easily be opened with normal fire department equipment. A-30-2.2 Escape chutes, controlled descent devices, and eleva- tors may provide escape routes in special structures; however, they should not be substituted for the provisions of this Code. A-30-2.4 Exception No. 3 The Washington Monument, Washington, D.C., is an example of a tower where it would not be practicable to provide a second stairway. A-30.26t2 or further information on pier fire Protection, ee NiFPA 307, Standard for the ConShi!¢-lion and Fire Protec lion of Marine Terminals, Piers, an Whalves. A-30-6 Fire safety information for manufactured home parks will be found in NFPA 501A, Standard for Fire Safety Criteria for Manufactured Home Installations, Sites, and Communities. A-30-8.2.1 Where an occupancy chapter (Chapters 8 through 29) permits the omission of sprinklers in specific spaces, such as small bathrooms and closets in residential occupancies, the CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0215 • FAX (206) 771-0208 FIRE DEPARTMENT �St. 189v Mr. Mark Scott RE: New Fe � Dock- WAWA Dear Mr. Scott: BARBARA FAHEY . MAYOR September 4, 1996 „ N 50F' The Edmonds Fire Department recommends a one -hour rated wall and equivalent -rated glazing to a height of 12' at the north elevation of the structure. Commercial vehicles of all sizes are anticipated in all lanes. The 12' height limit for separation of vehicle and passenger traffic is felt to be the minimum requirement provided for Are contingencies. J. Wkstfall or Inspector cc: Fire Marshal CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0200 • FAX (206) 771-0208 POLICE DEPARTMENT • A STATE ACCREDITED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 890 19�1 TO kAASC&T-r Recipient's Fax Number FROM 3>-�/ L 115—, DATE TRANSMITTED `l &/? G NUMBER OF PAGES L If there are any problems during transmission, please call: Police Department 771-0200, extension Fire Department 771-0215, extension_ Municipal Court 771-0210, extension RE:�ri�-y-��. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The documents accompanying this facsimile transmission contain information belonging to the City of Edmonds. This information may be confidential and/or legally privileged and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmittal sheet. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that disclosure, copying, distribution, or the use of the, contents of this transmitted information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile in error, please notify us immediately by phone. at the above listed number. EPD310 1/96 • Incorporated August .11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 04/29 '96 14:33 ID:WSDOT ARCHITECTURE M Washington State A Department of Transportation , GATE TIME No. OF PAGES (including uatl-alm! TO LOCATION VOICE PHONE N . SCAN FAX PHONE NO. - SCAN COMMENTS tc) c FAX:360-705-6829 PAGE 1 Facsimile Transmittal �] Call for Pickup Q Deliver FROM . Mark LOCATION l De -pi. VOICE PHON NO. SCAN FAX PHONE NO. SCAN 10 .1 • 11 � I W 0 C> M X a LL A Gxt Lao,--, — G•x✓mead w,4i-% '"'' 1i PREUMINARY 10O WASMNCTDN STATE FERRIES VMSHVI M WAVE DEPAW ED4 OF IRANS WA M 3�5 :soo lz r, o.Kwsaws . ria.nt�s im [c EDMONDS PERRY 7ERLdNAL OVERHEAD PASSEXCER LOADING AND AGENTS OFFICE 01-- 0429 '96 14:34 ID:WSDOT ARCHITECTURE FAX:360-705-6829 PAGE 2 M ' : .vr..w�v..w•..-..•nnn W ' Lo ET ATA ►+ ali 110 d 4 : � fiGiMrnaJ �` 4 [ r,�- ee. • psi s • � � r r„ —71 Ew L•E LEGEND J COUS1REKT)Orr NOTES LL NOTES i - i � ��.. �.. ' a'•i• +t .:fit. a t ;i s j F, •: .i • .r .. t - O - ? i f� r �:•r. : : r i r � r P IF a . . et +mma Iq iEo.A)o Sao.1q• ••• w►SHINGTON,� STATE FERRIES EOMCNDS FERRY Tc R INA l M D n 5 S rASN)NG7DN ST/ITE OVERHEAD PASSENGER LOADING cacDaG:c,:•uw a 4 DEPARTMENT Of TAAMsvoRTAtIOM AND AGENT'S OFFICE (p SS,,. SEC.: F.L. Gram SITE PLAN Dt1E iL r Y S 47 - IIp1 ev n•Lu swla• as 4ID a1wlllll� 00 4w"ft c n. swM•r w m L.a G I\r : V-WO . AdW MWashington State AP Department of Transportation Memorandum RECEIVED APR 10 1996 FDMONDS FIRE DEPT. Date: April 9, 1996 From: Bill Shisler/Mark $Cott Phone: 705-7367 /N subject: Edmonds Interim Overhead Loading Edmonds Ferry Terminal Project No OL. 2160 To: Ted Bell - MS: TB-32 After a review of the schematic plans for the above referenced project, the Architecture Office has the following conclusions. The spans over the water for this project should be classified as a waiting area (A2.1 concentrated use) because this is actually the waiting room for the terminal. The occupancy loading for this portion of the terminal should be 3 square feet per person(reference table 10-A). If only 6' (or 1 /2) of the overhead system were to be used as waiting area with the other half being used for exiting, then the occupancy would be calculated from 2320 sf./3 sf/person = 771 persons. The entry of the terminal should be calculated at 2540 sf / 15 sf/person = 170 persons as indicated with interpretation #1 of the March 25, 1996 memorandum from Hewitt -Islet' to CH2MHill. This would make the total occupant load 941 persons. As documented in Hewitt-Isley code review, this would make the Occupancy an A-2.1 because the occupancy is greater than 300 persons. The Uniform Building Code would also require a building Type II-1-hour, where steel structures must have fire protective coverings, roof and ceiling assemblies must be of 1-hour construction, and exterior walls would be 2-hour construction with no openings. Fire sprinklers would also be required. It is unreasonable to require the fire protective coating and the 2-hour construction since the likelihood of .adjacent construction to this structure is almost non-existent due to the fact that the property to the north and south is owned by the Edmonds Park Department. This overhead loading structure will be located primarily in the public way and is by jurisdiction, exempt from the code requirements. Also since the type of construction is visually open to both sides and lineal in configuration, the occupants of the structure would have adequate visibility of any life safety incidence adjacent to either side of the structure. i Additionally, it would be our comment that since the spans will actually be used in a waiting area occupancy, you might consider the possibility of including benches along certain portions. We would also recommend that this code interpretation be reviewed by the Fire Marshall for the. City of Edmonds to obtain the approval of his - department, since they will ultimately be providing the protection. If you have any questions, please contact Mark Scott in the Architecture Office at (206)705-7367. WGS:MS:dec