Loading...
7108 175TH PL SW.PDFiiiiiiiiiiii1069 7108 175TH PL SW Y � � � �., { Vic• � _ � o:t,:? . -� ' ' � • , � �- � z �uri'c� FIL5 JAN 2 9 1982 Vli. Ui ruuul-11VI1W January 28, 1982 MEMO TO: Utility Billing FROM: Building Division SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ADDRESS Due to a recent plat and an addition of a new road, the a 71st Avenue West must be changed t 108 175th Place S. . Harold Reeves Building Official cn cc: Street File 40 p-, �h �l4- y Nts 1kIUIL.T NO"r P20VIDE.D. IN'FoRr%A-r►0v,1 GIVEN WAS FROM MR. LoONE-I� COwNE.R) AND lUm WORKER. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR INS F �,L� Permit SIDE SEWER PERMIT 775-2525 2 L Issue Date, - PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE'777777 * DORs CNA►36E 1. Address of Construction -Jf „ rT'r©g " 1'75T"�+ Pt�. 5.�nj l % C.<1 �� 2. Property Legal Description (include all easements)G,., Ir- 3. Single Family Residence Multi -Family No. of Ur, Commercial 4. Owner and/or Builder 5. Contractor & License No. 6. Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes Right-of- way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig (342-5344) before excavation). 7. Cross other private property: Yes No Easement required - attach legal description and county easement number. READ THE FOLLOWING AND SIGN: a. Property owners must obtain a permit to install side sewers on their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to construct side sewers in the public right-of-way. b. The side sewer contractor assumes full repoUIL AMOURIach installation for one year. �'C^�C V^� �G C. Commercial establishment requires a minim �V Cs1V n (6") side sewer line. - 00 - 562-6478 d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty inches (30") to any structure. e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade of 2% (1.15°) and maximum grade of 100% (450). f. No turn in side sewer greater than 45° (1/8 bend) is0allowed between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 45 (1/8 bend) and wye with removable cap. g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected to side sewer system. h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines through other than granular soil. i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer line run. j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure due to poor compaction of fill. k. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved by the City. 1. Inspection during normal working hours only. Two (2) working days notice required. DATE: I certify that I have read and shall comply with the above F4 PERMIT FEE: DISAPPROVED By: Date: v W By: Date: CONNECTION FEE: APPROVED By: Date: * PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB 5ITE NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). Side Sewer Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO- ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS ❑ LID NO ................... AsmT. NO. -- -------------- (Wto - OWNER -ACA.41,1 --- D.—I-QPNEY ------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTOR ----- B. CIS s ----------------------------------------- PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS .... ...... S.W -------------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. -A---_------_--- ..--•---------- BLOCK Nn -r) - - N�j (PREv tousL!i 1'14 2 2 71 sT W r-- s fLMNWOOD LINE ---------------------------- ........... PLAT ....�.F .... FoRE,-5-1 ------ R-MGE --------- NAMEOF ADDITION ..................................................................................................... ...... ----------- r REFER -ro S.S. OPAW IMG 710l? 175TH pL. -ro WH'3-109F I ?arm 5T. g 72.ftD Agr. PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) Approved: DATE......... ------------------------- I -------- By ............................................................ -Fk0tM%-r CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTP& FOR INSPECTION CALL is Permit N? _ _ ss90 SIDE SEWER PERMIT 775-2525 Ext. 220 Issue Date 94� PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITEE 1. Address of Construction 2. Property Legal Des/^�crirption (incllude aeasements)-,A,, All easements) 71. 3. Single Family Residence _Z= Multi -Family No. of Units Commercial 4. Owner and/or Builder J o N )%,f � �_ e f of t:F_ 7 5. Contractor & License No. a Al (_0 /V 11 3 LQ 6. Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No.4— Yes (If Yes Right-of- way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig (342-5344) before excavation). H 7. Cross other private property: Yes NoEasement required - attach legal description and county easement number. H w READ THE FOLLOWING AND SIGN: a. Property owners must obtain a permit to install side sewers on their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to construct side sewers in the public right-of-way. w b. The side sewer contractor assumes full rep Wi&iWU% each H installation for one year. �n C nn'''' ac. Commercial establishment requires a minimjfWRI YAUiDij (6") � side sewer line. A'� u d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than i i s (30") to any structure. e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade of 2% (1.150) O and maximum grade of 100% (450). 0 E4 f. No turn in side sewer greater than 45 (1/8.bend) is0allowed between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 45 (1/8 bend) and wye with removable cap. g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected to side sewer system. h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines through other than granular soil. i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer line run. j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure due to poor compaction of fill. k.. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved by the City. 1. Inspection during normal working hours only. Two (2) working days notic required. DATE: 9L —1—certify t a I have read and shall comply with the above PERMIT FEE.' DISAPPROVED By: Date: w By: Date: CONNECTION FEE: APPROVED By: Date: PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE �i r Z O CITY OF EDMONDS .." PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A. *Address or vicinity of Construction • Owner:;-' Name Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code • Contractor:;'' Name Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code RF-CF—I'VF-D itNo. Z i 0 C T 2 B 198, Issu`e�Date.. STREETtILt. • Permit Issued To: " _¢ -1 • Type of Work to be Done: 3 x --�4I • Work in Connection With: D Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ Comml. / Ind. ❑ Apt. Condo. • Pavement Cut: ['"Yes ❑ No State License Number Telephone Number * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature ,� '�; Hate �. Owner or Agent * * THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ►�./.��rs��./S/.�.•r�►.s.//.�.i/►�//nI�►.rsd►I.I�►.�'.�.�r./►,r./►/.�.I�►.II'.�.�►�,/s�,��►,/./ C Issued B �f Permit Fee �. .. Time Authorized: Void after days Security Deposit: Special Conditions: t�z`;'" ;.,• r9a• �.` Receipt No.: -w ,OLI I Z4 -d ,,e: , r T . a e < r Q Fund I I I Fee:.-- Ammendments: Street Cut Dimensions v X * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * w € Eng. Div, Decembcr 1978 FIELD INSPF.CTIONOTES (Fund. 111 A.Pute conv to Street Dent. Comments: Diagram: Contractor called for inspection Yes No Kork Disapproved By: Pate: Bv: Date; Work Approved By: Date: Inspector: Ena. Div. December 1978 and she asked for a hearing date prior to that to discuss utility rates. COUNCIL - MOTION: WOMAN ALLEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN KASPER, THAT AN ITEM BE PLACED ON THE P�b4�� MARCH 18, 1980 COUNCIL AGENDA REGARDING A PROPOSED INCREASE IN UTILITY RATES, LEADING PTO AN ORDINANCE TO BE READY FOR PASSAGE MARCH 25, 1980. MOTION CARRIED. Q.G. d& .A, d Councilwoman Allen noted that information from the Finance Director indicates that the City is limited to selling bonds at 8% and nobody will buy a bond at 8% in today's market, so a bond issue is a real problem. She noted that there are states and municipalities having trouble selling bonds at 12%. @," Councilwoman Allen advised that she would not be present March 18. AUDIENCE Greg Farrar who lives at 4th and Bell and is eligible for a residential parking permit objected to there being a fee for the permit. He questioned why he had not been notified when the hearing was held on the matter, noting that the police parking checkers had his name on a list so he would not be ticketed and that the people on that list should have been notified of the hearing. He was advised of the standard methods in which hearings are publicized and was told that the ordinance passed requires the fee to cover the cost of processing the permit. PRESENTATION BY ANN WERMUS, LIBRARY BOARD CHAIRMAN Ann Wermus spoke on the need for additional library space and asked that this need be given a top priority. She requested a feasibility study on possible expansion of the library at its present site, and she asked that a timetable be established, beginning with the feasibility study and culminating with a bond issue date, thereby moving toward the goal of acquiring the needed library space. She felt a bond issue would best succeed if the library were expanded on its present site, rather than moving it to the Anderson Center site, and she also asked that the library be kept on a separate proposition on any bond issue. Councilman Gould asked if any of the funding in the architectural budget for the Anderson Center could be used for such a feasibility study, or if there were other grant monies available. Parks and Recreation Division Manager Jim Jessel said he would investigate. Councilman Gould also asked the Staff to investigate what the estimates would be for a feasibility study of expanding the existing library or building a new one on this site. The information will be ready for the retreat. Councilman Gould stated that it is only fair to look at this alternative but, at the same time, the Council was not giving up on the Frances Anderson site, and he noted that part of the thinking that went into the Council's decision to buy the elementary school was because of the need for a library. Councilman Kasper said he had a feeling that the Anderson site was going to end up being crowded, so this alternative may be feasible. Councilman Nordquist recognized Mae Schoenrach from the Sno-Isle Regional Library who was in the audience. Anne Sibbett of 610 Alder St. said she is a teacher of gifted children and they do not use the Edmonds library because it is inadequately stocked. Joan Nykreim of Friends of the Library said she has a family of readers and they have gone through all of the books at the library. Rory Jakes of 616 Daley, an eighth grade teacher at Holy Rosary School, said his students have unsuccessfully attempted to find material related to drama, and -the science and technology areas are not up- to-date. He said the waiting period for books is too long and reference books need updating, and there is not enough seating. Chris Howard of Friends of the Library stressed the need for more of everything in the library facility. Some questionnaires which had been completed by young people using the library were submitted to the Council so they could see how the library was rated. Councilwoman Allen assured Hhose present that their concerns will be given serious consideration. EARING ON DESIGN REVIEW OF 7-UNIT PRO AT 17422 71ST AVE. W. - DIVERSIFIED BUILDERS FILE PRD-3-79) Acting Planning Division Manager Mary Lou Block showed slides of this site, noting that it originally had been proposed for a standard development but that a PRD had been recommended because of the steep topography and trees on the site. The access will be a looped street using the existing roadway to reduce further disruption to the site. There is an existing home on the site, and the open space area will include EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 - March 3, 1980 the generally steep terrain and will be accessed by a walkway. The Planning Commis- sion had recommended that the homes on Lots 2 and 3 be designed specifically for the site because of the topography; i.e., design a house that will fit the existing building pad and not bulldoze the area to make a flat pad. The north setbacks of Lots 1 and 2 and the south setback of Lot 6 would be 15', rather than the 25' generally required in a PRD (variance granted by the Board of Adjustment), but Ms. Block noted that in a standard subdivision only a 7 1/2' setback would be required. The site would accommodate eight lots in a standard subdivision, the underlying zoning being RS-8. The individual lots will be smaller than under a traditional development, but it was not felt that the site would be overcrowded if there was the condition that there be no more than 35% lot coverage, the result being that the homes would be slightly smaller in size. Ms. Block recommended approval of the PRD with the following conditions: (1) 35% lot coverage restriction; (2) Houses on Lots 2 and 3 to be designed to fit those lots; (3) The open space area to be planted to retain the soil. Ms. Block stated that the Staff originally had suggested that there be no parking allowed on the loop street, but the Planning Commission had not agreed. The Planning Commission had added a recommended restriction that tree cutting restrictions be included and that the trees to be cut be identified prior to cutting and the tree - cutting plan be approved by the Planning Division. City Engineer Jim Adams commented that the roadway of 71st W. from 174th to 176th is one of those where the right-of- way and pavement are not in the same location, and this development will help to resolve that problem, but an amendment to the Official Street Map may be required to straighten the road. Councilman Kasper said he sat in on this hearing and there were some questions in his mind having to do with small lot sizes and expensive houses, the narrowness of the road, and the small rear yards. Fire Chief Jack Weinz was asked about emergency vehicles maneuvering through the proposed loop road, and he responded that they could not get a fire truck in there if parking were allowed on the loop road. Councilman Gould asked whether this site actually could accommodate eight lots, and Ms. Block responded that the applicants' engineers had come in with an 8-lot subdivision, but the Planning Staff had felt it would be a mistake to access from 72nd Ave. W. because of the cliff. Councilman Gould commented that the trade- off was one less residence in exchange for open space, and Ms. Block added that there was the loop access and not cutting into the bank below. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Randy Sleight of Reid -Middleton 6 Associates said 20% of the total area will be designated open space, and he noted that one of the smaller lots which is 5,221 sq. ft. would have a maximum sized house of 1,800 sq. ft. under the 35% lot coverage restriction which is a fairly common size. He said they were not trying to make small lots but were trying to fit in the existing topography and the existing roadway to try to save as many trees as possible. Regarding access for fire trucks he said the original plan was to stop such trucks outside of the plat and run a hose to the building, a fire hydrant being just outside of the plat. Fire Chief Weinz said that was not good tactics and not acceptable. The public portion of the hearing was closed. MOTION: COUNCILWOMAN ALLEN MOVED TO APPROVE PRD-3-79, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS STATED BY THE Amended PLANNING COMMISSION: (1) 35% LOT COVERAGE RESTRICTION; (2) THE HOUSES ON LOTS 2 AND 3 TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THOSE LOTS; (3) PLANTINGS TO BE ARRANGED ON THE SLOPE TO PREVENT EROSION; AND (4) TREE CUTTING RESTRICTIONS IN THAT THE TREES TO BE CUT WILL BE IDENTIFIED PRIOR TO CUTTING AND THE TREE CUTTING PLAN WILL BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION. COUNCILMAN NAUGHTEN SECONDED THE MOTION FOR DISCUSSION. Councilman Naughten was concerned about parking on the loop road. Ms. Block said they could require a reasonable number of parking spaces on each site, possibly gravelled parking that would not create impervious surfaces. She said usually two parking spaces per unit are required in a PRD, single family homes requiring only one --but most having at least two. At Councilman Naughten's suggestion, Amendment COUNCILWOMAN ALLEN ADDED TO HER MOTION THE REQUIREMENT THAT THERE WOULD BE NO PARKING ALLOWED IN THE LOOP ROAD AND THREE PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED ON EACH LOT. Chief Weinz said that would be satisfactory for the fire equipment, that although it would require jockeying they could get the equipment in if no cars were parked there. Councilman Gould said he really would like to see only six lots in the PRD, but this development at least gave one less developed lot than a standard development would. THE MOTION THEN CARRIED. Mr. Sleight stated he did not like the imposition of requiring three off-street parking stalls on each lot instead of the standard of two. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 - March 3. 1980 LL EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEB 2 9 1980 February 26, 1980 Dir, Of Public Works The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Mayor Harve Harrison in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center. All present joined in the flag salute. PRESENT Harve Harrison, Mayor Jo -Anne Childers-Jaech Bill Kasper Katherine Allen John Nordquist Ray Gould Larry Naughten CONSENT AGENDA STAFF PRESENT Charles Dibble, M.A.A. Fred Herzberg, Public Works Director Jim Adams, City Engineer Irene Varney Moran, City Clerk Jack Weinz, Fire Chief Mary Lou Block, Acting Planning Div. Mgr. Jim Jessel, Parks & Recreation Div. Mgr. Nancy Dilworth, Landscape Architect Gary McComas, Fire Marshal John Wallace, City Attorney Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk Councilwoman Allen asked that Item (I) be removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN KASPER, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. The approved portion of the Consent Agenda included the following: (A) Roll call. (B) Approval of Minutes of February 19, 1980. (C) Acknowledgment of receipt of Claims for Damages from W. C. Brennan and Hans Lutz, amounts to be determined. (D) Report on status of handling and storage of hazardous materials in downtown Edmonds. r s, a,,J, /E) Setting date of March 4, 1980 for hearing design review of 7-unit PRO at d- 17422 71st'Ave. W. - Diversified Builders (File PRD-3-79). (F) Setting date of March 4, 1980 for hearing on Shorelines Management Sub- `'"'� stantial Development Permit for 3-lot subdivision at Lots 12, 13, 14, 17, 18 and 19 of Maple Manor (unrecorded) off Olympic View Dr. (G) Authorization to accept Quit Claim Deed in conjunction with short subdivision for 9' of right-of-way along Driftwood Lane (Patrick). e{H) Acknowledgment of receipt of petition for water/sewer LID, vicinity of 72nd Ave. W. and 175th S.W., and passage of Resolution of Intention 254, creating LID and setting date of April 15, 1980 for hearing on preliminary assessment roll. (J) Referral to Council Finance Committee for review and recommendation the question of installation of a City purchasing system. PROPOSED RESOLUTION ADOPTING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCT OF PUBLIC HEARINGS [Item on Consent gen a Councilwoman Allen questioned the reason for adopting these when a resolution was adopted in 1974, copies of which had been furnished to the Council in this week's Council material. City Attorney John Wallace noted that the rules adopted in 1974 were for the conduct of.Council meetings, and these rules were for the conduct of public hearings. COUNCILWOMAN ALLEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST, TO PASS RESOLUTION 463, ADOPTING THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCT OF PUBLIC HEARINGS. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Nordquist requested that they be prepared in booklet form &A&A., and be placed in the compartments at each Council member's place on the rostrum. l(�S'Ec Ti2D- 3 - 5 c ,)71� Vk�DARD CITY OF EDMONDS OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE APPLICANT Diversified Builders, Inc CITY & ZIP Seattle, WA 98155 F E # E /U FEE Z5 oQ RECT # Z-390 APO'S HEARING DATE: // - Ll - Tp ADDRESS 14559 - 27th Ave. N.E. PHONE 362-0186 s 364-2173 INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY Contract Purchaser 7/,s111r- 1h) LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY Lies between 72nd Ave. W. & 71st Ave. W. & south of 174th St. S.W. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY That portion of Tract 143. Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, lying westerly of the County Road running north and south• EXCEPT the south 302 feet thereof and EXCEPT the north 100 feet thereof. VARIANCE REQUESTED: To reduce the perimeter setback from 25' to 15' along the north and south boundaries. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY USE ZONE: ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) �C 4ofSignat Applicant er, or Representative On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared—�-----',a,J irni� who, being duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says that (s)he has prepared and read the attached statements and has acknowledged to me that the recititations contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of lf- 19;7 Notary Public in and for th State of Washington, residing at��i� DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT Please answer all questions 1. What are the physical characteristics, (i.e. topography, shape of lot, etc.) which create a hardship for you in regard to development of your property? Lots I and 6 ares slightly narrow (approx. 60 feet) and with the roadway being a looped system, a minimum of 10' setback from this roadway was recommended by the Planning Staff instead of being built up to this line as allowed for in the City zoning code. The topography on the west half of this site is rather steep in a naturally wooded valley. The road configuration was designed this way to save as many trees as possible and to follow the existing driveway pattern. 2. How does your property differ from other property in the same vicinity? Surrounding property owners are required to maintain 7.5' as a minimum setback in this RS 8 zone. We are requesting a mrnimum o or double this requirement. The property owner on the north is approx. 2'+ from the property line with is home. 3. Will this variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to other property or improvements in the vicinity? No, no views will be impacted. 4. What hardships will result to you if the variance is not granted? Will these hardships have been caused by your own action? _ThP prODpr -,itina of individual houses on the lots would be rather limited Some privacy may be lost to individual homes being so close to the roadway. due 5. Can you make reasonable use of your property without the variance? Yes, however, the houses would have to sit very close to the proposed loop road. .17 Zv �r 1 126,30 .`71 1 � o I I / \ \ \ 1 �• 6g121 j \� \� \ /� \ \ ray% DOGWOOD N 1 1 • \ 1 1 41 99 is CEDAR -14 i �- IEX. TREE UNf (TYF.1 1 /� I O � �✓ ��.`�t..` �/ �� � 121.3 ,/ �a CE ► I I� - _ , , 113 75 _ _ _ _ -• °' h 6,4910 N 4 �~ 0 \ 66.05' `\ p� FIR � O � to 7 ,( EX. CURB 6g N J 3dDFRIRIVEWAY 92.105L41J r 18 R 7 Q0_ 7n LAWNa GARDEN r. 6 Rco \ \ TQ 91 \ \ \ \\ ` 7..50" \ 68 00' 115.91 r - ` L Uf ,- (TYPICAL) I Aftl-7-1,24 7/574 w RECEJVED C0 o ("7AUG 2 8 1979 o -vFILIFV-1n ` ST' (Utic works CFI LE ENV. CHECKLIST REC'D CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: q APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENTS FEE: 50.00 REC'T A HEARING DATE: to ENV. ASSESSMENT FEE:_jjrW_�2s .' 06 ZONING ORDINANCE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OFFICIAL STREET MAP PROCEDURE: Applications are sent to the Planning Commission for hearing. The Commission will accept, reject, or revise the proposal contained in the application. This Commission action will be forwarded to the City Council in the form of a Resolution. After the City Council receives the Resolution from the Planning Commission, they will set a public hearing date for the final disposition of the case. The Council may confirm, reject, or modify any decision of the Planning Commission'. 362-0186 APPLICANT: Diversified Builders, Inc. PHONE: 364-2173 ADDRESS: 14559 - 2)7th Ave. N.E., Seattle, WA 98155 PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, OFFICIAL STREET MAP. (Line out incorrect titles). In the case of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, describe the "use" designations to be changed (single-family, multi -family, commercial, etc.) and the physical areas involved. Proposal is to amend the official street map on 72nd Ave W. from 176th St., S.W. to 174th St_ S.11. to be a SO -foot right-of-way as it now exists instead of 60 feet. REASONS FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT: The topography is extremely steep for a sidehiII cut along -the easterly margin of 72nd Ave. W..too steep to build a road from 1711th St. S.W. down to 175th St. S.W.-,-along 72nd Ave. W. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS (Must be submitted at time of application) 1. A drawing or map of the area involved. 2. Names and addresses of all property owners with land abutting a proposed street change. 3. Environmental Checklist, completed, with the $50:-00 fee. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The signatures of local residents supporting this application may be attached to this form on a separate page. APPEAL PROCEDURES: Section 12.16.110(e) - The City Council, pursuant to public hearing called by them upon written application therefore by any interested party or upon their own order, may affirm, modify or disaffirm any decision of the Planning Commission. Such written application to the City Council by any party, other than the Planning Commission, must be made viithin thirty �(30 dgys.of-?he publ' ing before the Planning Commission. -7 4 / SignatuXe of Apol caitt ti so August 1, 1979 File No. 79-068 OWNERSHIPS ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN 80 FEET OF BOUNDARIES OF PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FOREST RIDGE q_--• Q,��.�+ ��,�� —�&yC 1.�'z P. D. Preston 9100 Roosevelt Way Seattle, WA 98155 Dennis Hania 7229 - 176th S.W. Edmonds, WA 98020 David Sanborn 11230-1/2 Palatine N. Seattle, WA Jay M. Davis 17508 - 71st Edmonds, WA 98020 William Blankenship 7010 - 174th S.W. Edmonds, WA 98020 Becker, William 18007 - 72nd W. Edmonds, WA 98020 John Ryberg 20029 - 108th Ave. N.E. Bothell, WA 98011 Michael Gibb 17521 - 72nd Ave. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 Timothy Stewart 13321 - 22nd N.E. Seattle, WA Westwind Builders 9832 - 16th S.W. Seattle, WA Jay M. Davis 17508 - 71st Edmonds, WA 98020 Kenny Fung 17417 - 71st Ave. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 R. D. Burke c/o Advance Mtg. Co. P.O. Box 146 Detroit. Michigan 48232 Jerry Morris 17511 - 71st Ave. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 Jacob Miller 17520 - 15th N.E. Seattle, WA Keith Elder 7125 - 176th St. S.W. Edmonds, WA 98020 118 z cm 1�i El 1: 120 II 119 1 331.1 S73.8 40"1 L4yNNW00D P L. A T.': OF M E 0 W I 123 �C 7 4.Q v J172 N D ST. S.W. 110 12, 166.11 200 ISO �j 65B.2 10 El ZZZ 2 Vi qjc) 06 9 6 D D A 160 i� $ 3 E co So no 160.14 GoLn 139 012010 120to so ND I: A E ;0 0';e 13122 0 4 6 ks 110 1-02. dL B R A t\R 15 80 4 40 v w 120105 2 22 21 N 20 14 HEI HITS 135 145 35 253.5� m 413.11 ?5 41 3 1994 pl.,t 4 —1 4 15Z _,. 174E] A101-1 #Il GLE'N.-,3 ,ELLE - 6 SN -F --1 .7,* 0 175 TH VIE 141 142 15 1,0 10 VI W R 6 7 •7-AOO It A "—n —19 a 14 1p 43 St,L2 167 If L40 J :1, 10, 14 18 17 16 15 13 12 . -79 -/3' Ci > .... .... .... ..o 85 65 N 0 T 4 EN 176TH 24510 0 0 277.35 1 -ST. 20 so 78 0 2 3 2140 Ito.o"Sir 2 15 17 -- _ -. _ Fl , 4 ti • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction:• The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to those questions now will help all agencies involved undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the permit for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts that will be caused by your proposal when it.is completed,'even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all agencies involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a'standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "not applicable" (N/A) and continue on to the next question. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Diversified Builders 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent__1.4srg - 27th ASP u F Seattle, WA 98125 (Contact Ruth Ron erude - 365-3800, Agent) 3. Date Checklist Submitted 7/31/79 4. Agency Requiring Checklist Edmonds Planning Department 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Removal from official street map of 16 feet feet of right-of-way on 72nd Ave-, W 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: Our proposal is to remove 10 feet of right-of-way from street map to extream topography problems from 176th St. S.W. to 174th St. S.W. and to make right-of-way uniform 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): North Meadowdale area north of 176th St. S.W. and west 71st Ave. W., east of 72nd Ave. W. The physical setting of this site indicates that it is in a native state. The topography is rather steep in the northerly third of the Suhieet rightw of waY 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal__1981 9. List of all Permits,'Licenses, or Government Approvals Required for all Proposal (federal, state, and local — including rezones): Council approval 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which anay affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: I B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion . of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? _X._ Explanation:_ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement,;...Asture or temperature, or any change in climate,, either locally or regionally? x Explanation: _ -Temporarr deter%ration-wi 1-1-occur•-during -some—eonstruct•ion-due-tc dart, Toss of -trees and -other such uses associated with construction-and-access-develoMiT . 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of sur- face water runoff? X _ • YES MAYBE NO c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? >L.. d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? x e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter- gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? x i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X Explanation: -A,tacm-reten inn-susL m-wi-th-niF-Cp�aratinp-uri-1_I--hn-rnrtc't'ri�r�p�_ _to-mitigate-the•above ooss`ibie-orobl-ems: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (in- cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? �t b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X.� C. Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of exist- ing.species? JL d. Recution in acreage of any agri- cultural crop? Explanation: Some trees wi 11 be.,lost-due--to--cons rilcticfr _hnwPypr-rhP-huP Mari -ere--tree-conscientious. -3- YES MAYBE NO S. Fauna. WIII the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X c. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new fight or glare? Explanation: Add4-tional.._head-l-ight-glar-e-and-home-dl-ight-Lng-wi-l-l-be_naLLced-. B. Land d Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Y Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result n: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? X b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: A YES MAYBE NO 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condi- tions? X Explanation: On lyw those --as soo i-a t ed-wl-th-t he,.4ons.tcuc.ti.an-Lnd us my 11. Po ulation. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. housin9. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? X_ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x `e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: -A--smallwincregleo•f-traf•fice°-i-nto 7-Ist• Ave-wii-Fbe-'experrenced. -5- % % YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect on; or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental services? X Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a nee or new systems or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communications systems? ; c. Water? _.X_. d. Sewer or septic tanks?—X— e. Storm water drainage? f._ Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: 4ewer_,both.-storm.and..sanLtary-w;44—be—needed=f;.rom-thb—.weswt-, •6- ti • YES MAYBE NO 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quan- tity of existing recreational oppor- tunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and:complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaratic or non -significance that it might issue in reliant on . checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful la of full di lostir on ,part. i 0 r -7- T N 0 3 w ao z w M z m n m_ rn rn rn .n trt rn m 0 z to C m O D z 0 0 nt m 0 a r= 0 SENDER: Complete -items 1 and 2. Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. 1. The following service is requested (check one). Show to whom and date delivered ............ 150 Show to whom, date, & address of delivery.. 350 ® DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom and date delivered: °i_.i._L.,. 1650 DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom, date, and address of deliver ..............................•......--• y _...--- 85¢ 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: Mr. or Mrs. John D. Looney 17422.- 71st Avenue West Edmonds, Washington 98020 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. I 4067SS I (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) I have received the article described above. SIGNAT%IRE �c a. DATE OF DELI ERY POSTMARK 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if requested) 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERK'S INITIALS /` A 0 6 7l GPO : 1974 O - 527- BUJ if, (plus postage) I` NT TO �+ r POSTMARK SE OR DATE Mr. or Mrs. John D. Looney STREET AND NO. 17422 - 71st Avenue Westf P.O., STATE: AND ZIP CODE �I{ `�r nnnnn i �s� ITEYUnu 1. silows 10 vnmu unu u111 1. ...... ............ With delivery to addressee only ............ G5 IMCEIPY 2. Shoes to eihom, data Ind cihero delivered.. 35 GnVICES With delivery to addressee only ............R5 I DELIVER TO ADDR SEE ONLY ..................................................... 5C SPFCIAL DELIvE1tY (o>tgra foe required) 115 Lorin 38 �I10 I00111Af10E COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 110O d0Y Gott 10YERUMIOUAL MAIL (Sao other side) �+ GPO: 1070 0-307-408 CITY of EDIVi'� 200 Dayton Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 Department of Public Works March 12, 1976 CERTIFIED MAIL e�O6 Mr. or Mrs. John D. Looney 17422 - 71st Avenue West Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. or Mrs. Looney: The matter of your sewer connection at 17422 - 71st Avenue West has been investigated by the Engineering and Water/Sewer Departments. It has been concluded that a waiver is to be granted you on the sewer connection of your property because your property is over 200 feet from the existing main line sewer and exceeds 20,000 square feet in area. However, if your property is subdivided in the future, connection will be required. Although a waiver for the connection of your property has been granted, it will be honored only if the following stipulations are strictly adhered to: 1. Existing septic system shall be maintained properly. 2. Should any problems arise with the septic system, the owner shall immediately connect to the sewers. Sincerely, SIGNED J. HERB GILBO Director JBM:jt 11 • 0 MA 4 1976 CITY ENGINEER'S SEWER CONNECTION RECOMMENDATION Pub c worNs Date March 3. 1976 Address of Property to be Connected 17422 71st Avenue w. 3 D 11 ` t) �,ei - %;�- Owner Name & Mailing Address John D. LOOnee, Same as above Legal Description: All that portion of Tract 143, Meadowdale Beach, according to plat thereof, recorded in Vol. 5 of Plats, Page 34, records of Snohaanish County lying westerly of county road lying north and south of said tract, EXCEPT North 100 feet and EXCEPT reads Recommendation: Findings: 1. House over 200 ft to sewer s 2.' House too lowto reach sewer 3. Lot over 20,000'sq. ft. Recatrendation: Waiver subject to a septic system operating properly and the availability of sewers to west (unit 7). �i ty 7.rineer ' 1 1 0 , MAE �! CITY ENGINEER'S SEWER CONNECTION RECOMMENDATION Date March 3, 1976 Address of Property to be Connected 17422 71st Avenue T4. Owner Name & Mailing Address John 1D: looney, same as above Legal Description: All that portion of Tract 143, Meadowdale Beach, according to plat thereof, recorded in Vol. 5 of Plats, Page 34, records of. Snohomish County lying westerly of county road lying north and south of said tract, EXCEPT North 100 feet and EXCEPT roads Recommendation: Findings: 1. House over 200 ft to sewer 2. House too low 10 reach sewer 3. Lot over 20,000"sq. ft. Reccnmndation: 11aiver subject to a septic system operating properly and the availability of sewers to west (unit 7). C ty gineer r � CITY EtIGiNEER. S SEWER CO1117ECTI0t7 RF.COMNEtIJATiOPt Date Address of Property to be Connected I74-z Ayr , Owner Name 6 Mailing Address Jo" D a 1,®O O-J " Legal Description: TyD � r� A-rr� 1 Recommendation: WA -IV qz;70&Ja:r T ;A' s�577,/c 5ysrey P120eent/ +J0 -rYf�- AV-44,40&jr TO 7) rnor. F /14 /74 CITY FAILON DS Date 5/ 174 SubJeC Sewer Cnnner_tinn ENGINEERING DEPARVNT ACTIOLREPORT l� File Attachments Yes No ROUTING: Name initial Date Name Initi&T Date I Rhonda s-1 2 Dick 4 INITIATOR: Name, Mrs. John D. Looney Phone Work: 682-5000 Address 17122 - 71st Ave. W. ACTION: Figure connection charge or is this property assessed unde .LID 164? Legal: All that portion of Tract 143, Meadowdale Beach, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of plats, page 34, records of Snohomish County, lying westerly of C1auajy row jyjng_nnrth and south of said tract except S 302 feet and except N 100 feet and except roads. They were told there was no way to connect. Elevation? l 2 d P _ 92 S► i r I °I Too "�®pj All concerned notified 1✓r5 �lC�T' Action Completed Form Z8 so 9 /o�/o 9- 4 /0 o(6 04 -/� /6 /2 /39 j.5rATES — ST. S.W. 03 — 13 1 06 1 07 6 / W --- /0 /38 — 5 i + I i 03 02 ( DI i j /4 I 105 0 4 3 i t Q 7 I I ( f I ^l 41 02 I ELF 2N I o,l.—�5 I � 771 S"T S.W. s1 GLEN I ! I d + ci-!��.�.� � I PROF. o/ S.W. r -------- i + i 17 00 5 5-49- / � i0 i 09 �� t'LAT I I + I 9 175th. \ — — — — — — --i 14 /42 8 0w /43 08 ] 02 rr- ro 11J i 1 CHERRY --- /45 7GREST — 193 .02 — J 06 l + G! t ld I t /7 /6 /5 /4 /3 /2 ti — i — — _ — — — — L i ! �— � I 0 I fo 01 1 /7 04 1 05 i ob I 1 /S 08 1. /e /6 /5 /4 /3 /2 17 i i2 04 :7 co REGARDING: 17422 - 71st Avenue West a ress R E C O R D O F C O N T A C T S NAME, PHONE NO., DATE ADDRESS of CALLER COMMENTS 5/l/74 J. D. Looney Certified Letter No. 406212 sent requiring hook-up within 60 days. 5/3/74 Has verbal waiver from Engr. Dept. 3/4/76 Received recommendation from Engr. stating waiver should be granted since property is over 200' from VA sewer main and exceeds 20,000 sq. ft. m 3/15/76 Certified Letter No. 406755 sent stating waiver is granted per Engr. findings. I .. , ACTION TAKEN Letter received. Advised Mrs. Looney to get written confirmation of waiver and submit it to the Public Works Dept. Letter received. INITIALS TE TE JT JT • � 0 REGARDING: 1'7e42—? _ 7/ sf address RECORD OF CONTACTS DATE NAME, PHONE NO., & ADDRESS of CALLER COMMENTS sl3J��� 41- s ACTION TAKEN CI'lv lid h y. C�I�ma��ir- l�Ju-u1cr� Initials SENDER: Be sure to follow insfruc-,'ions on other side FLEAsE rURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show address Deliver ONLY where delivered to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below GISTERED NO. ISIMAKT-ORE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE (Must always be filled M3 RTIFIED NO. S ltGj (IRE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY/ UATL ULUVLRLD a SHOW MERE DELIVERED (Only if requested, and include ZIP Code) -7 VON Wus postago) 303— 06200 LOONEY, J. _0'AT 17422 71ST AVE 14 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADUITIONALFEES _ • IIETUM I Shores to V'11 (late deliverer] ............ With dell9vilelralid addressee only ............ RECEIPT Dp 150 650, 2� Shovis to vilie in, date and viliere 10 SMIC th delivery to addressee only"vo.l.ed.­ 81510, DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................... —SP01wi —DELIVERY - (oxtr required) � .. ........ ..... PS i"orril NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (Soo other side) Apv. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO: 1070 0.397—jo