The URL can be used to link to this page

7118 174TH ST SW.PDFiiiiiiiiiiii1059 7118 174TH ST SW C' Water Service Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO. NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS ID LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . .................. OWNER................................. .............................. CONTRACTOR ............................ ....................................................... PERMIT NO. !9�-573 JOB ADDRESS ..... ............................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT Nk— . ............... : ..................... BLOCK NO. ................................... ........................................................... ............ .................... ......... ....................................................... NAMEOF ADDITION .................. .......... ......................... ......................................... ...... Oct cr: .T Q, CL C 1:3 ;Z. co ii Raj 9. cl ffe c "cagnarV, Er R6 W Y V4 ppre PVN4-00u1-11175 (REV.11 1176) DATE .................. By .... ................................................. NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City. of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). iiiiiiii lill 11 15645 7118 174TH ST SW APPROVE® B L NING 23 '7 PROJECT DATA: LEGEND 65 ZONING: RS-8 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SF: 2799 SF �.1 HOUSE/GARAGE/DECKS: 2079 SF LOT SF: 6835 SF c, DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK: 720 SF BUILDING IMPRINT SF: 1989 SF ADDRESS: 7118 174TH STREET S.W. LOT COVERAGE: 29.1 X LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF TH E NORTH 100.00 FEET Z7 BUILDING SF: OF THE WEST 169.62 FEET OF TRACT 143. PLAT OF MEA0 WDALE MAIN LEVEL: t334 SF BEACH VOLUME PER PLAT RECORDED IN VUME 5 Of PLATS ON 21 UPPER LEVEL: 1184 SF PAGE 38, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINCTON, LYING GARAGE: SOUTH OF 174TH STREET S.W. A .� �.� /Q 517 SF DECKS k ENTRY: 300 SF NOTES RWMM ARE 1D NAVE A YA>a1MN HEIGHT CALCULATIONS: ! ?•— A — 99.0' 397' / 4 — 99.25' B = 1025' + 25.0' C = 10"0' x TWO AS FRESEM ON TIGS Sa ALLOWABLE MAXIMAM HEIGHT = 124.25' _._.SANITARY D — 925' PLIW WAS TAM FROM A TGPO SIW ox By OIADIICR RRVMG AND 397.0' BRIG DATED FTS 18 1994 — ---� 57REET —_`r— SW (30' yy)— — ' — 83_L5 _31. W W 100.81,_ ! p �, —LOT A (14) - '�_ LOT B (11) n (5457'SF� ,, _{6835 SF) _ DRI AY t, N _m _ _ ! ♦♦ `.`` �� a-, ♦ % _ A- a _-_ \•ate_ WALKKr, - ` 3 3 rc we rz aoop�ur xr � ___ ♦ VINUM4 J NEW RESIDENCE It 10Y N 1\ \1 `♦♦ `S1 �2r j `� 04 b 7118 174TH STREET S.W. mMON05 WA / I ^ 1O1 \ \\ ♦ 0 _ O O \\ O I rtl DEE CK. a i 91E PLAN acr °� ♦�\\� �♦, ��,`_--------------- ♦ ` ��__--_---------- ---j `, `,, DECK `ate c.,azC �`� WOOD,WAY 7, ♦ ♦ \ ♦ _b `� I' ` x III' tr-•. �` ♦ —%. _ ASSOCIATES, I _ ♦.c �.;; ,_fi�62' __—`--------b — _, ____ -_ —T—mac= {� gg p'e 9 W. 100.00 \�a� ♦♦iaa • a •s�o des 7w `00-----,r elr lr 4ZIS IV 3e emi i, f Nam 9TE PLAN , �. ^•_ !� r m psi. _w,ur=Lma oma aAA9 Setbacks/Variance/Setback Adjustment Conditional Use Permit ADB Requirements Other Zoning Requirements Underground Wiring Required ------ .. ... 5 Lot Slope IS% ------ 4_2= 1, . . . . . . . ... Ell, 6 SEPA Environmental Checklist/Hydraulics Permit Tree Cutting Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Plat/Subdivision Requirements . . . . . . . . 9 Legal Description Verification ................................................ ..... ......... . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yom= ... 16 Quit Claim/Street Dedications ........ Easements - Public/Private .12. Engineering Storm Drain .Review Fee . .......... -.13. Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee 14 Drainage Plan (On -Site) . Setback - Top of Bank, Stream, Water Courses .15 16 Setback -Storm Drain Line . . . . . -.17 Open Ditch - Existing 18 Culvert Required Culvert Size A 20" Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff ... 21 Catch Basin Required ----------- - 22� Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access 23 Sidewalk Required Curb & Gutter Required25 Curb Cut For Driveway Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Street Paving Required 27 Right -Of -Way Construction Permit Required . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 28:: Street Name Sign Required -29 Other Signing Required :2 0 Bond Required For Public Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... FEM&M.2p Check/Water Table .rye32 Side Sewer Availability Calculate Sewer Connection Fee If No LID # 34-� Create Street File . ........... . :: 11 �j 36 Existing Water Main Size lo, Water Meter Size . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... 37 Service Line Size 88 Water Meter Charge Required Xm 39 Hydrant Required 40 Hydrant Size Existing 41 Fire Line Charge Required - Sprinkler :42 IStreet Cut :48 IMiscellaneous ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . Reviewed By: FIRE N PLANNING EN`6INEEFfffgCElVaaLIC WORKS MAY 1 4 W7 PUBLIC WORKS D17.-I R E C O R D OF C O N T A C T S I . 21 2 22 3 23 4 24 , 5 25 6 26 7 27 8 28 RW PERMIT # DATE ISSUED RECEIPT # 9 29 10 30 11 31 12 32 13 PAID RECEIPT # DATE 33 SS PERMIT /{ 9 DATE ISSUED %A 14 PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE 34 15 35 16 36 17 37 METER SIZE3 PAID $ DATE! / % RECEIPT #IC9Q5 18 38 Sr Cyr' /00. 19 39 20 40 - STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM �- WORKSHEET OWNER CALC BY: ADDRESS -1116 1:11 rH ':4 `-�>''-R/A PHONE: S VG `" 7 Lcl my +i1 d S W A. , E DATE: * .-.*DESIGN DATA'�'�* IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE LG ORIFICE I` DETENTION PIPE LENGTH LOCKING LID ISHED G (TYPICAL)�®MINIMUMP 1%`,,'z7 MIN CLEARANCETIGHTLI MEASURED f ROM tOP OF BOX OR RISER .5% TO 12 SLOPECONC 0 OUTLET OUTLET CONTROL MIN. UPPER CATCH BASIN CE AFECEIVED CONTROL CATCHBASIN MAY 1 4 1997 SYSTEM CROSS SECTION PERMIT COUNTER 2'X2'X6' DEEP, 4-6' SPALLS OR EQUAL FROM CONTROL -CB 2'X 2'X 3' DEEP, 3/4' CRUSHED ROCK ExISTING GRADE in OCK FROM CONTROL O��NTRENCH OW TRENCH, MIN 10' LONG. PIPE TO BE LEVEL PIPE W/ END CAPS SHALL BE LINED WITH H1 RAF1 RIPRAP OUTLET PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF WASHED DRAIN ROCK RUNOFF SPREADER. TRENCH FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED TO DETENTION SYSTEM NOTES: I. Call Engineering Division (771-0220) for a tightline and detention system inspection APPROVED BY before backfilling and for final inspections. 2, Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the responsibility of the property owner. Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed DATE out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. The outlet control orifice must be k t open at all times. 6 _ . Table 1 — Detention Pipe Sizes Impermeable Required Area Sq. Ft. Vol Cu Ft 2000 50 2500 62 3000 75 . 3500 87 4000 100 4500 112 5000 125 Note: Allowable Pipe Materials: .,r Impermeable Area Sa. Ft. 2000` 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Pipe Diameter 15" 18" 24" 30" 40 28 16 10 50 35 20 13 60 42 24 15 Required pipe 70 49 28 18 length in feet 80 56 32 21 90 63 36 23 100 70 40 25 Reinforced Concrete Aluminized Steel Aluminum CMP Asphalt Coated N-12 ADS (Not permitted on roads) Table 2 — Outlet Orifice Sizes Outlet Orifice Diameter (Inches) 5/8 5/8 3/4 3/4 7/8 7/8 7/8 Table 3 — Rectangular Catch Basin Requirements Detention Max. size Catch Basin pipe diameter knockout Type < 18" 20" Type I, CB 15 18" to 24" 26" Type IL, CB 16 24" to 36" 36" Type II, CB 19 19 (48" Basin) 36" to 42" 42" Type II, CB 19 19 (54" Basin) *Source: Assoc. Sand & Gravel Co. Standards 5 Revised 3/16/95 Ul ll1. V'/NLLCJJIUIC f1VUJll ly LU. M Cuo-�o /-J7Jtl tl�,i)11/13/y/ ";'/.Ub AM 02/3 ' Y Dennis M. Bruce, P.E M.S.C.E, M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer November 13, 1997 City of Edmonds c/o Woodway Associates 11422 - 238th Street S.W. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Hank Pelto Subject: Geotechnical Inspections New Single Family Residence 7118 - 174th Street S.W., Edmonds City of Edmonds Permit No. 970823 This engineer has performed an on -site geotechnical evaluation of the lot for the proposed new single family residence at 7118 - 174th Street S.W., Edmonds, Washington. This engineer has reviewed the preexisting geotechnical report prepared by Cascade Geotechnical, Inc., dated July 24, 1990. This engineer is familiar with the Cascade Geotechnical report and is in agreement with their findings and conclusions. As requested by project developer, Woodway Associates, Inc., this engineer to provide the required on -site geotechnical inspections in accordance with Permit No. 970823. These inspections to include: 1. Excavation, grading and fill placement. 2. Soil bearing capacity for foundation areas. 3. Drainage. 4. Erosion control. This engineer has begun on -site inspections. Lot clearing and grubbing has begun (November 12, 1997) by Evergreen/Bill Spagnola. This engineer has discussed site conditions with Mr. Spagnola and is in agreement with excavation to date. SOILS ' FOUNDATIONS ' SITEDEVELOPMENT ' INSPECTION ' DRAINAGE ' DESIGN& PERMIT ' LEGAL 17814 - 8th Ave. N.W. *Shoreline, Washington 98177 ' (206) 546-9217 `FAX (206) 546-8442 f Druce/AcceSSIDIe Housingl,0. 1W LUb-Jb/-Jysd I�1]1 mj/; s/ . /.ui Hive u•�io 1"Woodway Associates, Inc. Page two This engineer will continue to provide required geotechnical inspections including photographs and final certified report. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer >�r3,�Yv°'t.;+.'ti=.,.Pau+N'J'Ak�`'nuC'��•:B�.fYr4Yy',a.1X%.,,,,tir�.nrv�""F"Hyp'^""'3�.,.,.�,..,�r".C+q�•-R�i1'� K1P ��(""��r+'lS•v..•:.,c'4* �"an`�'vV�'Atir.,;�il��ue�ra•:,-.,,ria�f\.,�a�tri''?rrrr-`Zl�nn'�`t�-•�.�rcrs , 46 CITY OF EDMONDS 8g0.1qqo Address of Construction `741 Property Legal Description (Include all easements): Owner and/or Contractor: State License No l�4[ Single Family /❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units ) ❑ Commercial ❑ Public SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT 8927 AVH 3 U 1998 PUBLIC WORKS DEPI Bulling Permit No. 9 %o 5,?-3 Invasion into City Right-of-Way:x No ❑ Yes RW Construction Permit No. Cross other Private Property: ix No ❑ Yes Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement 1 certify th9aflll have read and shall comply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. .I Date * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION bFRCE'USE ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL M -SM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Permit Fee: Issued By Trunk Charge: DO Date Issued: y��fS 9 9 Assessment Fee: // Receipt No.: �3,'il Lid No.: - Partial Inspection: Date Initial. Comments Reason Rejected: Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date 640-10 Initial-D.G- ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Bull Copy: Applicant . _--- - - — Revised 3l90 NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). t- The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO- .............................. ------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION X REPAIRS ❑ LID NO . .................. ASMT. NO . .................. OWNER ................................................ ............................................... CONTRACTOR ..... ).0-444 --- d ... ... PERMIT NO. ..... k7oU JOB ADDRESS ..... ...... 71/t? ..... 17Y4 - --------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO. .................................... I _ 9 Ara- 9C I PWW-0001 -11/75 (REV. 11/78) .................................................................................................................................................................. NAMEOF ADDITION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approved: DATE ... eC72V.-9F .............. By ....44le .................................. City of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number. `" Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: � o.= !%-/ In C. lg9 0 B. Type of Work (be specific): C., Contractor: Contact: Mailing Address: /u7 9 S� AJ - Phone: Liability Insurance:B/ � Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): o 8'L 25 Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable)- E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: �® INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut 1Q Yes ❑No G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO TH APPLICANT. Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the, pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspectirposes. Signature: "f (Contractor CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: `• TIME AUTHORIZED: OID AFTER DAYS RIGHT OF WAY FEE: 'S off' DISRUPTION FEENUND I It: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 9�,C�!�Z—a _J S RESTORATION FEE: 11 T OTAL FEE: RECEIPT NO.: . 1 ISSUED BN : r NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR Td PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. 1997 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES' " '-(Fund' 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO :Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work. Disapproved By:. Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 STH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR I COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant Inc. 189� June 4, 1998 Henry M. Pelto Woodway Associates, Inc. 11422-238" Street SW Woodway, WA 98020-5220 SUBJECT: Your letter of May 29,1998 (re:.7118=174"Struf SM Dear Mr. Pelto; You will need to initiate a street vacation to obtain ownership of the unused right-of-way. The Engineering Division does not object to the vacation of the right-of-way, although necessary utility easements may need to be retained. Forms and directions are available at the Planning Division located on the second floor of City Hall, 121 Fifth Avenue North. The quit claim for the right-of-way on 1741" Street SW, north of the house you are constructing at 7118, must be recorded as a condition of the issuance and approval of the building permit. Final inspection and occupancy will not be possible until the document is recorded. If there are any questions do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220. Thank you. Sincerely, f JAMES C. WALKER, P.E. City Engineer JCW/GCH/cmc G:\ENGR\GOPDWELTO.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan WOOD WA YASSOCIA TES, nvc. COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTORS RECEIVED May 29, 1998 J U N 1 - 1998 City of Edmonds ENGINEERING Director of the Department (Engineering/Planning) C/O Mr. Gordon Hyde Edmonds, Wa. Mr. Hyde: This letter is in response to our work to resolve the City of Edmonds encroachment of 174th St. S.W. onto my two lots, Parcel A and B. Specifically, 7118 174th S.W., and the lot due west which is bordered on the other side by an abandoned right of way, 71st street, which because of its steep nature will never be developed and is currently being used as a debris landfill by local neighbors. I am ready to grant the City of Edmonds a quit claim to the encroached property but feel that in all fairness the City should grant me quit claim to portion of the abandoned 71 st street right of way that abutts my property to the west. If you will look back, the City has made an effort and accommodated other property owners along 174th street in order to clear up the mislocation of the street as it pertained to the original design. The entire street has "moved" south and in one instance a house sitting in a portion of the right of way was granted a repreive by property being swapped in order to correct the flaw in both the house and road mislocation. Presently, my company, Woodway Associates, which owns Parcel B, is nearing completion of a new residence on 7118 174th S.W. I own the lot due west, Parcel A. Both parties wish to resolve this matter with the City of Edmonds on a fair and reasonable basis. Please review your long range plans for the abandoned right of way and let me know which way we have to go to clear up the road encroachment. Sincerely, Henry M. Pelto 11422 - 238th Street S.W. Woodway, Washington 98020-5220 Phone: (206) 546-6571 Fax: (206) 546-1463 City of Edmonds. .RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number- 0 8'�> . .. �": .e '"-,,..• Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: fn^V �4 B. Type of Work (be specific):-F'MPrI �%/. I�H/ Atc., id,(TAI Z L_Al r, U C. PDtj E+$ C. Contractor: spa O. C o. P. U.® Contact: S O B "'k A K A L(V Mailing Address: Z 1 r) 1 i t-1 w y 9 9 Phone:(., 2 S) 670 - 3214 State License #: Eta AAo W DS WA 4802 . Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): J. E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ffl Single Family ❑ Other VQ .INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes []No G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN " r , INDEMNITY- Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its, departments or ` employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Two 'sets of construction drawings of proposed work required .with pernf'it application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the'end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purposes. V Signature: Date: 3 - / % - 9�' CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: t/1 RIGHT OF WAY FEE: ,;t 00 TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER Vb) DAYS DISRUPTION FEENUND I It: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: V4 RESTORATION FEE: T OTAL FEE: RECEIPT NO.: ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR. TO kRMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Di I v 1997 PNA® A Install 3" sec riser on pole(1 U705) Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County 1476-W Rev. 11.97 B Trench 91' E to staked pedestal location Location: 7118 174TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 SOUTH COUNTYArea Install 91' of 3" pvc from riser to pedestal location Pole No.: : 27 N R: 4 E S: 8 SW 1/4 Date: 3/16/98 W. O. No.: $ 3 Z C Set secondary ped as staked Reason For Work: Installing sec ug riser and ped for Woodway Engineer: Kakaley Dwg. No.: i Z.4O(o 3 Associates Drafter: U.G. No.: Run - 140' of 350kcm Al triplex from xfmr to new ped location gas heat Scale: N T�z Date Work Completed: Approved: Date Printed Foreman: Fee's Req'd: ®Yes ❑No Environmental Analysis ❑Exempt ❑Not Exempt Substation: 78 - Meadowdale Para. Item Circuit No.: 12-1839 Phase: 2 Primary Overhead O.H. U.G. Cond. KV ❑Residential ❑Commercial ADD CKT.FT. PH REM CKT.FT. PH Engr's Tel. # LEO No.: NET CKT.FT. (425)-670-3214 '@ /' _$ 0.00 } Engr's Pager # (425)-787-7523 O.H. U.G. Cond. KV ADD CKT.FT. PH Secondary Overhead Basic Fee $0.00 REM CKT.FT. PH 1@ P =$ 0.00 NET CKT.FT. Meter/Conv. Pole $0.00 Permits (Date Granted) ❑Tree Trim Primary Underground ❑Residential ❑Commercial ❑State Basic Fee $0.00 ❑County LEU No.: ®City ' @ P =$ 0.00 II Secondary Underground Easements Basic Fee $740.00 ❑Required ®Not Required ' @ P =$ 0.00 Underground Plat Basic Fee $0.00 Date Released c-ft@ P =$ 0.00 Foreign Contacts ❑GTNW JPN No.: Street Lighting c-ft@ P =$ 0.00 ❑CATV JPN No.: ®Joint Trench GTNW & CATV Work in Right of Way ❑Primary ❑Joint Bore GTNW &CAN ®Secondary ❑ 91c-ft@ 7.10P =$ 646.10 Pole Stenciling From To Miscellaneous Fees Vault $0.00 Take Off Pole Permit $30.00 Pre-Const. Requirements $0.00 ❑Tree Trim ❑PUD Locator $0.00 ®Backhoe ❑Flagging ®One Call Date Total Due: $1,416.10 No.: Index Pole Plat Date Paid: Logs U-Map Receipt No.: XFMR C-Map New Service Application No: I Location Map Page 4556-1 M ]I- SL-MO-a J-5415{-X 3-13 m SL-153.52-D * UB r y�1 edge of asphalt road C C'4 r` LO r -�------------- N 174th St SW 71181 APPROVED BY PLANNING PROJECT DATA: 'V 1— " LEGEND ZONING: RS-8 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SF: 2799 SF HOUSE/GARAGE/DECKS: 2079 SF LOT SF: 6835 SF DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK: 720 SF 1 �7 Z BUILDING IMPRINT SF: -1989 SF ADDRESS: 7118 174TH STREET S.W. LOT COVERAGE: 29.1 x LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 100.00 FEET Z ( BUILDING SF: OF THE WEST 169.62 FEET OF TRACT 143, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE MAIN LEVEL: 1334 SF BEACH AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS ON 2? UPPER LEVEL: 1184 SF PAGE 38. RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LUNG NOTES GARAGE: 517 SF SOUTH OF 174TH STREET S.W. DECKS & ENTRY: 300 SF RW� RAVE A MAXIM HoaIT IF r-a HEIGHT CALCULATIONS: ? - A - 99.0' 397 4 - 99.2W r'- - - - - / - + 25.0' C = 103'0' TIC TWO AS PR�t M ON TKS 9M ! 1 -•- _ _ �" �i 1I�Y1'1 ._ - _,_._•SANITARY ALLOWABLE MAXIMAM HEIGHT = 124.25' SEWER,-._ D v 92.5' PLAN WAS TAKEN FROM A TWO 91thEY OX BY 01AM SIBFWMG AND 1 ® -._._ 397.0 FNGB1EDi01G DAM FEE 141994. i tXtiAi1H0�� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 174T}{ STREET _ 76.24' `_--- SW (30' ' -•- ROW) VAST f , 84 1 yy100.81. vV( Aj i o ---.LOT.A (14) - -- LOT B (11) `^ L----Q6B35 i N (54bi Sf.�- ��.� SF) DRI MAY 1 O �` NMY, *� _ ♦ `.` -�� asaq r A;. i -------=� WALK �`•� - -` -__ I �n as cis n airI `\�< •� • - __ _ - ♦3 NEW RESIDENCE I N \Q \\ \\ ♦♦ 01 �� t �. N m8 174TH STREET S.W. FDMONOS WA \ _ O �I-- O 1 \\ \\\ ♦� <♦ `------- O I \ --- � - ttn� DECK. '.'. Z 9TE PLAN 1 w or ♦♦♦ ♦♦ \� ♦` ��- `-------------- ---- ` `� �`. DECK ♦♦ if t>sn o.,a♦o WOOD WA Y i 7e ♦ ------------ 1� ---__ a�. ";\,#°p <-'�. ♦ '�- ___ 1� ASSOCIATES, 1 �♦ <---------- `_fii62_------------- " ♦� . ` _ '^ --'_`.'`♦' �• :~- `•♦ `, INC. mpINV •,c �� ci�a1Dr2 ♦♦ `�-------_er ---- /� 90 -0 N/♦ 100.00`♦ ♦♦ as i`ebMe>,�o �D 3' pyc ` it le ie 1aa Er-r r f 7e-r e-v Q � mcffm 9TE PLAN C SCAM ,/e -I em �. r.iu,o+r-ta,e CM Fb ft WFM— om �,e STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM WORKSHEET OWNER CAILC BY: ADDRESS I Z �'`� TN EsC 5,'\A/ PHONE: «7 Lcl w►v vl, of DATE: 4E * � �" 'FDESIGN DATA IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE LG ORIFICE it 1 -10. DCTENTION PIPE LENGTH LOCKING LID FINISHED G (TYPICAL) MINIMUM 6' MIN CLEARANCEE TIGHTLI MEASURED FROM iOP OF' y� CONC BOX OR RISER S% TO t% SLOPE !X OUTLET 1 OUTLET CONTROL MIN. h �] / UPPER CATCH BASIN ORIFICE E ¢ � � F L) CONTROL CATCH BASIN `"'`C r MAY 1 4 1997 SYSTEM CROSS SECTION RM04 COUNTER 2'X2'X6' DEEP, 4-6' SPALLS OR EOUAL FROM CONTROL CB 2'X 2'X 3' DEEP, 3/4' CRUSHED ROCK EXISTING GRADE FROM CONTROL OUTLET HASRENCH, MIN 10' LONG. TO BE LEWEL ;TRENCH W/ END CAPS ALL BE LINED WITH MIRAFI RIPRAP OUTLET PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF WASHED DRAIN ROCK RUNOFF SPREADER. TRENCH FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED 710 DETENTION SYSTEM NOTES: L Call Engineering Division (771-0220) for a tightline and detention system inspection APPt`IOVED BY before backfilling and for final inspections. 2. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the responsibility of the property owner. Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed DATE L_ out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. "Ile outlet control orifice must be keot oDen at all times. �1. 0 - , ws�ECEIV'9 STREET FILE MAY 1 4 1997 PERMIT COUNTER GEOTECHNICAL STUDY WOODWAY-EDMONDS RESIDENCE 72nd AVENUE @ 174th STREET S.W. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 9005-37G TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope Page 1 Project Description Page 2 Site Description Page 3 Subsurface Conditions Page 4 Conclusions Page 4 Recommendations Page 5 Site Preparation Page 5 Grading Page 6 Erosion Control Page 8 Foundation Design Page 9 Slabs -on -Grade Page 9 Retaining Walls and Lateral Forces Page 10 Structural Fill Page 11 Drainage Page 11 Environmental Checklist Page 12 Construction Monitoring Page 12 General Page 12 Appendix A Test Pit Location Map Appendix B Test Pit Logs Appendix C Unified Soils Classification System CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE (206) 821-5080 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 FAX: (206) 823-2203 July 24, 1990 Job No. 9005-37G Woodway Associates 11422 238th S.W. Woodway, Washington 98020 Attention: Kent.Kennedy Reference: Geotechnical Study Woodway-Edmonds Residence 72nd Avenue W. @ 174th Street S.W. Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Kennedy: At your request; we have conducted a geotechnical study at the above. site and prepared a soils report which conforms to the Geotechnical Report Guidelines set forth in the City of Edmonds, Ordinance #2661 (Meadowdale Site Evaluation Checklist). The purpose of this report is to summarize the results of our field observations and to provide conclusions and recommendations for the proposed construction. SCOPE €--! The scope of our study was to view the surface and subsurface soil L and ground water conditions at the above site, to address slope stability before during and after construction and to provide specific recommendations for site preparation, grading, foundation design, lateral pressures, drainage, erosion control and construction monitoring requirements. UI) Our fieldwork consisted of a visual site reconnaissance and the 111 drilling of two (2) test borings. A truck -mounted, hollow stem auger was used to advance the test borings. Samples were obtained L", CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 2 from selected depths in accordance with ASTM D-1586 sampling procedures. The test boring locations were determined in the field by our engineering geologist and were located on -site by pacing relative to known landmarks. The soil samples obtained from the test borings were described in the field and were classified using the Unified Soils Classification System. The test boring locations are shown on the site plan in Appendix A. The test boring logs and soil descriptions are presented in Appendix B. A copy of the Unified Soils Classification System is presented in Appendix C. All elevations mentioned in this report are referenced to the existing grade at the time of our field investigation. PROJECT DESCRIPTION We have reviewed the building plans by Woodway Associates dated May 10, 1990. The proposed building will be a 4980 square foot, two (2) story, wood framed single family residence with a daylight basement and an attached garage. The proposed foundation consists of a continuous strip footing and several spread footing post supports. A major portion of the residence and all of the garage will utilize a concrete slab -on -grade floor. An asphalt or concrete paved driveway is proposed between the garage and 174th Street S.W. Li ~ Based on our review of the above building plans and the Topographic Survey Map/Site Plan by Chadwick Surveying & Engineering dated November 30, 1989, we understand the main floor and garage floor j will be at elevation 100.00, the second floor will be at elevation 108.83 and the basement floor will be at elevation 91.17. The City of Edmonds requires a review of the final building plans CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 3 by our office to confirm that our recommendations were properly interpreted and implemented. The existing site topography as shown on the Topographic Survey Map and the proposed house footprint as shown on the Site Plan are presented in Appendix A. SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located south of and adjacent to 174th Street S.W. and east of and adjacent to the right-of-way for 72nd Avenue West in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds, Washington. The upper, northern portion of the site is relatively flat. South of the relatively flat area, the site slopes moderately down to the southwest. As shown on the topographic map, site elevations range from elevation 101.20 in the northeast corner of the.site, to elevation 77.10 in the southwest corner of the site. The site is vegetated mostly with mature fir trees. A veneer of uncontrolled fill appeared to overly much of the northern portion of the site. The fill did not appear to be significantly thick; however, it covered a broad area. No erosion of the fill area was a noted. No ground water seepage or wet surficial soils were TT observed on the site. The site is not located within the Meadowdale landslide complex as shown on the "Landslide -Hazard Map" by GeoEngineers, Inc., presented in the City of Edmonds' "Meadowdale Site Evaluation Checklist". Based on our review of the above map, the site is located approximately 3000' south of the southern extent of the Eli mapped slide area. The Landslide Hazard Map has classified areas outside the vicinity of the Meadowdale landslide complex and Lund's Gulch as a Landslide Hazard Areal (defined as having no landslide hazard identified). x z x CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005=37G Page 4 This site is located outside of the Landslide -Hazard Map area, well away from the mapped -slide area and Lund's Gulch. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site were observed in two (2) test borings. Test Boring #1 was drilled near the top of the slope at the northeast end, of the site (approximately elevation 101). Test Boring #2 was drilled approximately seventy-five (75) feet west of Test. Boring #1. (approximately elevation 100). Test Boring #1 showed gray, very dense silty sand with minor gravel from two and one-half (2.5) feet below the existing grade to the test boring termination depth of. twenty-four (24) feet. Test - Boring #2 showed approximately three and one-half (3.5) feet of uncontrolled fill overlying native, very dense silty sand with minor gravel to the test boring termination depth of twenty-four (24) feet below the existing grade. The uncontrolled fill consisted of loose silty sand with organic debris. The very dense silty sand with minor gravel observed in the test r� borings is consistent with the preliminary mapped geologic classification of glacial till deposited during the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation (Minard, 1983). is I`^ No ground water or, wet soils were encountered in either of the test borings. CONCLUSIONS It is our conclusion that the uncontrolled fill found on -site does not present a landslide hazard due to the minimal thickness of the till I CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 5 fill and the relatively flat slope on which it had been placed. However, the uncontrolled fill does present an erosional hazard. The uncontrolled fill is not suitable for supporting foundations or slab -on -grade floors if significant differential settlements are to be avoided. Site earthwork and.excavation would be expected to remove most of the uncontrolled fill from the site. Based on the findings of our investigation, we conclude no significant identifiable landslide hazard exists within the native slope on or adjacent to this site. Based on this, we conclude that the site should be classified as a Type 1 landslide hazard area (none identified). We conclude that the construction of the residence will not decrease the stability of the site or the surrounding area if our recommendations are carefully followed. It is our conclusion that the native, very dense silty sand.with minor gravel is suitable for supporting the building loads and the garage slab -on -grade floor. The proposed foundation design.appears suitable for the existing site and native soil conditions. E- It is our conclusion that the proposed approach for control of storm drainage from footing drains and impervious surfaces is suitable for the proposed construction. The building plans show an enclosed, on -site detention and conveyance system which routes the water to the southwest corner of the site and then to the existing storm sewer system located near the intersection of 72nd Avenue West and 175th Street S.W. L" RECOMMENDATIONS Site Preparation Eli, We recommend removing all vegetation, uncontrolled fill and topsoil �h ;1 r CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 6 r from the proposed building area. These materials should be removed from the site.. We also recommend leaving the existing vegetation intact in areas outside the proposed building location during construction. These areas may be cleared and planted with erosion resistant vegetation or landscaped in the future. i We recommend that the earthwork be done during an extended period of dry weather. The fine-grained native soils found in our test borings are sensitive to moisture, and may cause construction i. difficulty and significant additional construction costs if site preparation and/or earthwork takes place during wet conditions. Grading Site grading, as shown in the building plans by Woodway Associates, Inc. dated May 10, 1990 indicates calculated excavation and fill volumes on this site to be 285 cubic yards and 285 cubic yards respectively. Based on the presence of uncontrolled fill and our recommendations regarding fill placement on a slope, these volumes �. may .need to be adjusted. The plans show cuts for the basement of the house will -approach nine (9) feet in height. We recommend that all temporary y construction cuts over four (4) feet, in height be laid back to a slope of l(H):l(V) or flatter. The plan shows a relatively flat, filled yard area between 174th Street S.W. and the proposed building. The fill in this area is shown as being retained by a structural retaining wall. The plan also indicates fill will be placed on the existing slope, south of the proposed building area. The plan indicates a minimum fill slope of 2(H):1(V) (50%). We recommend fill slopes be graded to a maximum of 2(H):l(V) (50%). CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 7 Yard fills that will not be structurally retained should be placed on horizontal benches cut into the undisturbed, native soil. The horizontal portion of the bench cuts should be at least ten (10) feet wide. The cut slopes separating the horizontal steps should be no more than five (5) feet high and should be no steeper than 0.5(H):l(V) (200%). The fill should be placed on the horizontal benches in twelve (12) inch lifts, and should be mechanically compacted. The final grade on the face of the fill slope should be 2(H):l(V) (50%) or flatter. Structural fill which will be utilized for garage slab -on -grade support should be placed as recommended in the Structural Fill section of this report. It may be possible to re -use the on -site native soils as structural fill if the material is free of organic material and the, moisture content of the soil is at or just below the optimum moisture. content. If the on -site soils are too wet to achieve adequate compaction, aeration of the soil will be required. This procedure will require continuous working of.the soil by ripping or plowing, and will cause construction delays if not { anticipated. We recommend against utilizing the existing site -fill as structural fill due to the amount of organic material within the -_, fill. If the on -site soils cannot be adequately dried or contain significant amounts of organic material, an imported fill soil will be required. A gradation for imported fill soil is presented in �t the Structural Fill section of this report. The placement of fills on this site must take place during an extended period of dry ;. weather. We recommend utilizing a track -mounted hoe for all site excavation. This equipment will allow work to be performed "at arms reach", and will minimize traffic over work areas. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 8 Excavated soils to be re -used on -site should be stockpiled at the north end of the site, well away from the slope, and should be covered with anchored plastic sheeting. All remaining excavated soils should be hauled off -site. Under no circumstance should excavated soils be wasted by pushing it onto the slope face. Erosion Control At the time of our fieldwork, neither the natural slope nor the uncontrolled fill had undergone erosion. We expect the potential for erosion during and after construction to be minimized if our recommendations for erosion control and drainage are carefully followed. Erosion control during construction. should consist of straw and/or geotextile fabric barriers placed along the downslope extent of all grading activities, and should be constructed so as to prevent any sediments from being deposited on.the lower. slope. Surface water within the excavation should be collected and directed away from the slope in shallow trenches. We recommend placing plastic sheeting over bare slopes during construction to minimize erosion. The plastic sheeting should be anchored at the top of the slope with stakes, and should be weighted down on the slope face and at the bottom of the slope with tires or sand bags. After construction, all bare, sloping ground should be planted with erosion resistant vegetation or landscaped to prevent erosion. Eli Steeper portions of the site may require the use of an erosion control/vegetation enhancement fabric (jute or equal). We should C review the erosion control plan prior to construction. E" CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 9 Foundation Design Strip footings and interior spread footings designed to a maximum safe bearing value of 2000 psf may be placed directly on the native, very dense silty sand with minor gravel if the soil is firm, undisturbed, free of organic material and does not become wet prior to concrete placement. We recommend a minimum continuous strip footing width of eighteen (18) inches for three (3) story construction, fifteen (15) inches for support of two (2) story construction,_ and twelve (12) inches for support of single story construction. Interior, isolated spread footings should have a minimum width of eighteen (18) inches. All perimeter footings should be placed at least eighteen (18) inches below the outside finished grade for frost protection. All water and loose soils should be removed from the footing excavations down to firm bearing soil prior to concrete placement. Slabs -on -Grade Slab -on -grade floors should be supported by the native, very dense silty sand with minor gravel or on structural fill that has been placed as recommended in the Structural Fill section of this report. A four (4) inch layer of clean sand, pea gravel or crushed rock having less than 5 percent material passing the #200 sieve based on the fraction passing the #4 sieve, should be placed below the slab as a capillary break. We recommend placing a vapor barrier between the bottom of the slab and the capillary break �> material. An additional 1 to 2 inches of clean sand may be placed over the vapor barrier to aid in concrete curing. L CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 10 Retaining Walls and Lateral Forces The plans indicate the house will utilize a daylight basement. We recommend that all basement retaining walls be backfilled with a free -draining granular fill which conforms to the following gradation: Sieve Size Percent Passing 4 inch 100 #4 25 - 75 #200 5 maximum based on the fraction passing the #4 sieve. The free -draining fill should extend from the base of the retaining wall to within one (1) foot of the top of the wall, and should extend at least two (2) feet back, laterally from the wall. The upper one (1) foot of wall backf ill may consist of native soil that is free of debris and organic material. A drain should be placed along the outside base of the retaining r, walls and tightlined to the storm system. The drain should consist of a four (4) inch diameter, perforated PVC pipe that is backfilled with at least twelve (12) inches of pea gravel. Retaining walls drained and backfilled as recommended may be designed to resist an active lateral force of 35 pcf equivalent fluid. This assumes a horizontal backfill, and backfilling which precedes first floor framing or other constraints on wall deflection. The native silty sand with minor gravel may be assumed to have a passive resistance of 400 pcf equivalent fluid pressure. We recommend utilizing a coefficient of friction of .40. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 11 We recommend that we be engaged to review the design of all proposed retaining walls. Structural Fill Based on the plans provided to us, it appears that structural fill will be required raise the grade of the garage floor area. It may be possible to re -use the on -site native soils as structural fill if the moisture content of the soils can be maintained at or just below the optimum moisture content and the soils are kept free of organic material. If an imported fill soil is required, we recommend that the soil conform to the following gradation. Sieve Size 'Percent Passing .4 inch 100 #4 25 - 75 #20.0 5 maximum based on 1 the fraction passing - the #4 sieve. Fill should be placed on a horizontal base of firm, undisturbed native soil in -twelve (12) inch maximum loose lifts and compacted to at least 95% of the ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density value. Drainage We recommend utilizing an enclosed, sub -surface detention and '1' conveyance system that routes the water from footing drains, roof Pdownspouts and other impervious surfaces to a buried detention �f facility at the southwest corner of the site. We recommend placing a continuous drain along the lower edge of the perimeter footings of the building and tightlining it to the L", CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 12 detention system. The drain should consist of a four (4) inch diameter perforated PVC pipe backfilled with at least twelve (12) inches of pea gravel. The roof downspouts should be tightlined to the detention system separately from the footing drains. Environmental Checklist We have reviewed the undated Environmental Checklist prepared by Woodway Associates, Inc. and have addressed the significant issues with regards to Earth withinthetext of this report. Construction Monitoring We should be engaged to observe the excavation for the building and the placement of the erosion control to confirm that construction is done in accordance with the approved plans. We should be engaged to observe the removal of uncontrolled fill from the top of the slope, monitor the excavation of terraces, the placement of fill and final grading of the slope. We should be engaged to observe the excavation of the building area to confirm bearing soil �. and verify subgrade conditions. The placement of the drainage r system should be observed by our office to confirm proper placement. The.above recommendations are for engineering review that goes beyond any testing agency work that may be required. General A detailed review of the final plans is required by the City of Edmonds specifications. Once final plans are available, we will flp provide a detailed review with any additional or alternate M"' recommendations that may be necessary. We expect the on -site soil and ground water conditions to reflect I L "i L' CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL July 24, 1990 Woodway Associates Job No. 9005-37G Page 13 our findings; however, some variations may occur. Should soil conditions be encountered that cause concern and/or are not discussed herein, we recommend that we be contacted immediately to determine if additional or alternate recommendations are required. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Woodway Associates, Inc. for the specific application to the proposed residence located at 72nd Avenue West and 174th Street S.W. in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds, Washington, in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices... No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for this opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. `T Sincerely, CASCADE GEOTECHNICAV,,- G g mb , X.E. Principal Engineer Jo a ler f' Engineering Geologist JS:pg Elf, M 9 a WOODWAY - EDMONDS RESIDENCE TEST BORING LOCATION MAP 174TH STREET S.W T.®1 1 -------_PROPOSED RESIDENCE 1B BD &y �� V, `1012 FROM TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY CHADWICK SURVEYING & ENGINEERING & FROM SITE PLAN BY WOODWAY ASSICIATES, INC. APPENDIX B I I H Led 14 Project 1 WOODWAY EDMONDS RESIDENCE Job No. 9005-37G Date . 06/06/9-0 Boring No. TB 1 Dwn. BY AEM Driller DRILLING UNLIMITED _Hole Drill 'Y" TRUCK MOUNTED HOLLOW STEM AUGER Goo/Eng. ROB BLOMQUIST 0 6" O.D. Fluid NONE 0 > Q. E a Penetration: a Soil Description & Classification Notes 0 I 5 SILTY SAND; GRAY, VERY DENSE, DAMP, WITH MINOR GRAVEL. (SM) SILTY SAND; GRAY, VERY DENSE, DAMP, WITH MINOR GRAVEL. (-$M) SILTY SAND; GRAY, VERY DENSE, DAMP, WITH MINOR GRAVEL. (-SM) SILTY SAND; GRAY, VERY DENSE, DAMP, WITH MINOR GRAVEL. (SM) SILTY SAND; GRAY, VERY DENSE, DAMP, WITH MINOR GRAVEL. ($M) 13 50 + -50 10 +5 15 50 +5 20 50 +5 25"- +5 T.D. = 24' Notes: NO GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TEST BORING LOG Pogo 1 of 1 ProiAct WOODWAY - EDMONDS RESIDENCE Job No. 9005-37G Date 06/06/90 Boring No. TB 2 D,wn. By A EM Driller DRILLI'NG UNLIMITED Drill Type TRUCK MOUNTED HOLLOW STEM AUGER Geo/Eng. ROB BLOMQUIS Hole 0 6" O.D. Fluid NONE a > Q. E o Penetration: Z Soil Description & Classification Notes -0 0 I 5 0-3.5'ORGANIC FILL SILTY SAND; GRAY, VERY DENSE, DAMP, WITH MINOR GRAVEL. (SM) SILTY SAND; GRAY, VERY DENSE, DAMP, WITH MINOR GRAVEL. (5M) SILTY SAND; GRAY, VERY DENSE, DAMP, WITH MINOR GRAVEL. (SM) SILTY SAND; GRAY, VERY DENSE, DAMP, WITH MINOR GRAVEL. (SM) SI LTY SAND; GRAY, VERY DENSE, DAMP, WITH MINOR' GRAVEL. (5M) P 65- +5 +5 37 59� _ +5 10 15 50 +5 20 50 +5 25 5C /o, +5 T.D. = 241 Notes- NO GROUND -WATER ENCOUNTERED. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TEST BORING LOG 1 1 Page - of APPENDIX C w :J i UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL LETTER DESCRIPTION 4,. 4 GW Well - graded gravels or gravel - sand mixtures, CLEAN Ab little or no fines Poorly graded gravels or gravel -sand mixtures. GRAVELS GRAVEL &`,wt'«des GP little or no fines GRAVELLY SOILS GM Silty gravels or gravel - sand -silt mixtures GRAVELS WITH FINES COARSE GC Clayey gravels or gravel -sand -clay mixtures GRAINED � � .�..�. Well -graded sands or gravelly, sands, little or SOILS CLEAN �� .; �'.: SW no fines SANDS `"; Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little SAND 6 .^._ SP or no fines SANDY SOILS SM Silty sands or sand -silt mixtures SANDS ' `' WITH FINES SC Clayey sands or sand -clay mixtures Inorganic silts 3 very fine sands, rock flour. silty ML or clayey fine sands, or clayey silts with slight SILTS & CLAYS plasticity clays of low to medium plasticity. CL -Inorganic gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays or lean clays Liquid Limit Less Than 50 III 1 I I I Organic silts & organic silty clays of low FINE I t l l l l l Ol I I I I I I I plasticity GRAINED 1111111 MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine SOILS sandy or silty soils, elastic silts ' SILTS 3 CLAYS CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays Liquid Limit Greater Than 50 Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. OH organic silts .7 �. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS"-- = PT Peat or other highly organic soils TOPSOIL � Humus 3 duff layer FILL Uncontrolled, with highly variable constituents BOL DATUM NOTE I2" O.D. Spilt Spoon Sampler Sample Interval URing or Shelby Sampler Sample Interval PSampler Pushed Sample Interval * Other Sample Type Sample Interval CM DATUM NOTE SZWater Level Date Recorded Ts Torvane Reading CCU Penetrometer Reading iWater Observation Well Tip Elevation CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF KEY CHART CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC 's ag0.l9e- City of Edmonds Critical Areas Checklist The Critical. Areas Checklist contained on and submit it to the City. The City will this form is to be filled out by any person review the checklist, make a precursory site preparing a Development Permit visit, and make a determination of the Application for the City of Edmonds prior subsequent steps necessary to complete a to his/her submittal of a development development permit application. permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: �-l��/2� tit• �'E�7o Name /0520 ALAAJ—A-DALE PLACE Street Address LoOMo,4/O5 WA City, State, ZIP. gfjpya- 9ta:q, Phone Signs re D Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date STREET FILE CA FILE NO. 614-3-L,, Critical Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 7118 1:14*M S,Treft-r S-W 2. Property Tax Account Number: 613 1 000 151-3 /1 06 I Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): Goo SF 4. Is this site currently developed? no. _yes; If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. — Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: No _; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway No floodplain No of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Ato Flows are seasonal? No (What time of year? 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ;mixed X urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs, etc)'. 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: Me RevOl/0094 • • In c• 1890 NOTICE TO PERMITTEE AND/OR OWNER PARTIAL APPROVAL VIOLATION D CORRECTIONS REQUIRED Permit Number Owner Job Address 3115 194-4-� 5-- Sw NO PERMIT -STOP WORK -REMOVE CONSTRUCTION OR OBTAIN PERMIT AND MAKE WORK COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES. CONSTRUCTION IS NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS AND PERMIT - STOP WORK. MAKE WORK COMPLY WITH APPROVED PLANS AND PERMIT OR REMOVE. STOP WORK - UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE BY CITY INSPECTOR. CORRECTIONS LISTED BELOW MUST BE MADE: BEFORE WORK CAN BE APPROVED AND/OR THE NEXT PHASE IS STARTED; TO AVOID POSTING OF A STOP WORK ORDER, ORDER TO CORRECT, OR ABATEMENT PROCESS. JOB CARD MUST BE POSTED ON SITE AND BE VISIBLE FROM STREET. APPROVED PLANS MUST BE AVAILABLE TO INSPECTOR ON SITE. WORK DESCRIBED BELOW HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND IS APPROVED. CONTACT INSPECTOR AND ARRANGE FOR APPOINTMENT. RECALL FOR INSPECTION. 7HC-- e2V Foa- RA vI NTIry -M F- 4 feguA cf1 �lTr— 2� I Or ti�eee-4::�j 1 1'1C- Cyep.�cl'. i Vf- allow: n*% 4X e'n.i r-- X THE ACTIONS OR CORRECTIONS INDICATED ABOVE ARE REQUIRED WITHIN DAYS OR PENALTIES MAY BE APPLIED. j FOR INSPECTIONS CALL 771-0220. LJBuilding Division Planning Department LZngineering Department Fire Department CITY OF EDMONDS Inspector l' �, :�6 Date Item #: EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Memo Originator: James C. Walker For Action: X For Information: Subject: ACCEPTANCE OF A QUIT CLAIM DEED AT 7118 —174T" STREET SW FROM HENRY M. AND SHERIE D. PELTO Agenda Time: Agenda Date: Exhibits Attached: 1. Quit Claim Deed 2. Vicinity Map Consent September 14, 1998 Clearances: Department/Initials Admin Svcs/Finance City Attorney City Clerk Court Personnel Fire Police Community Svcs Parks & Rec Planning Public Works Treatment Plant City Council Mayor Reviewed by Council Finance Committee: Community Services Public Safety Approved for Consent Agenda: Recommend Review by Full Council: Expenditure Amount -Appropriation Required: $ Budgeted: $ Required: $ Funding Source: Previous Council Action: None Narrative: As a condition of a building permit, the land owners at 7118-1741h Street SW, Henry M. and Sherie D. Pelto, dedicated right-of-way to comply with the Official Street Map. This deed meets that condition. Recommended Action: Council accept the quit claim deed from Henry M. and Sherie D. Pelto. Council Action: Return Address: City Clerk City of Edmonds 505 Bell Street Edmonds, WA 98020 QUIT CLAIM DEED Property Address: 7118 - 174th St. S.W. Edmonds, WA 98026 Assessor's Property Tax Parcel No.: 5131-000-143-1106 THE GRANTORS, Henry M. Pelto and Sherie D. Pelto, for and in consideration of mutual benefits to be derived by the establishment of a public Gtght-of-way, convey and quit claim to the CITY OF EDMONDS, THE GRANTEE, the following described real estate, situated in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, including any interest therein that grantor may hereafter acquire: That portion of the North 100.00 feet of the West 169.62 feet of Tract 143. Meadowdale Beach, as recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, lying North of a line 15.00 feet South of and concentric to the following described centerline: Legal description continued on ATTACHMENT A together with the right to make all necessary cut or fill slopes on the land of grantors adjacent to the above -described real property in connection with the construction, maintenance or improvement of the above -described real property for purposes of a public roadway. DATED THIS DAY OF,Us— 19 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) f•/E,a ay m . PEt,-ra AAka On this day personally appeared before me �5HE724C D. PEc-7a to me known to be the individual'lescribed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that — TN EN signed the same as 7H6-/P free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS P1124 DAY OF s r N TARY PUBLIC in and fo the !o —2O State of Washington, residing at - �,, /ylA.2YSviGL�s PELTO.DOC EXHIBIT 1 ATTACHMENT A BEGINNING at an existing concrete monument marking the intersection of the centerline of 174th St. S.W. with the centerline of 72nd Ave. W. in Section 8, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, . W.M., from which intersection an existing concrete monument marking the intersection of 173rd St. S.W. with the centerline of 72nd Ave. W. bears N1"18'22"W, a distance of 320.13 feet; thence S83"05'31 "E, a distance of 302.46 feet to an intersection with the centerline of 71st Pl. W., which intersection is marked with an existing brass surface monument; thence S83"06'06"E, a distance of 359.22 feet to an existing brass surface monument; thence continuing S83"06'06"E, a distance of 8.46 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 11130.23 feet; thence Easterly along the arc of said curve, consuming a central angle of 5"03'58", a distance of 99.94 feet; thence S88"09'29"E, a distance of 37.23 feet to an existing brass surface monument; thence continuing S88"09'29"E, a distance of 122.77 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 1102.03 feet; thence Easterly along the arc of said curve consuming a central angle of 5"11'44", a distance of 99.93 feet; thence N86"38'47"E, a distance of 570.56 feet to an intersection with the centerline of Olympic View Drive as the same was established by Snohomish County Survey No. 1340, from which intersection an existing cased monument marking the intersection of the centerline of 176th St. S.W. with the centerline of 68th Ave. W., bears S22"08'49"W, a distance of 675.51 feet, said former intersection being the terminus of the centerline herein described. PELTA.DOC VICINITY MAP 0 220 72/0 l 7309 7107 7027 7005 173/8 U ( AREA TO BE DEDICATED Q o I 17515 7025 7// 7023 70/1 1735615 74 TH ST Sw- - o - - - 7211 i- 00 7118 50 /7404 701O 71O5 CID N 175TH ST SW w o 0 w 7/03 Q 17417 > 7/07 17500 Q 700; 0 7/08 7009 z 7/06 7/04 F7/1 DATE: EXHIBIT PROJECT DATA: ZONING: RS-8 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SF: 2799 SF LOT SF: 6835 SF HOUSE/GARAGE/DECKS: 2079 SF BUILDING IMPRINT SF: 1989 SF DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK: 720 SF SEWER MANHOLE E. RIM ELEV. 99.83' LOT COVERAGE: 29.1 % HEIGHT CALCULATIONS: INVERT ELEV. 88.53, BUILDING SF: A = 99.0' 397' / 4 = 99.25' MAIN LEVEL: 1334 SF B = 102.5' ALLOWABLE + 25.0' _ UPPER LEVEL: 1184 SF C = 103.0' MAXIMAM HEIGHT = 124.25' GARAGE: 517 SF D = 92.5' EXISTING DECKS & ENTRY: 300 SF 397.0' POWER — — — _ SANITARY SEWER POLE EXISTING W. 1 ADDRESS: 7118 174TH STREET S.W. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I p HYDRANT � � --- .WA TER LINE 174TH — — — — BEE ST T ---_ _ ---------__.__ A 0 (3 ' — Row) 76-24 - - ---__ N B3,05 00-BI 100-BI 104-, 31 W I I 096,I ,LOT A (14) ' I LOT B (11) C� (6835 SF) DRIVE�W�AY " ^ 5457 —S-fED AS WOT -® CONCRETE OR I 9 4 N �� N I� ; APR®U ) d— i d- 92'cp � � �� _25'$ �� CUT=43CY \\ � I � I I � IN, � � � _ SETBACK W 90" \ \ \ I A=99.0' _ — _ _ �_ WALK < B=102.5' \ •I-- J b \ Q I 88 COVERED I POORC \ LEGEND NOTES ROCKERIES ARE TO HAVE A MAXIMUM FILE HEIGHT OF 3'-0". THE TOPO AS PRESENTED ON THIS SITE PLAN WAS TAKEN FROM A TOPO SURVEY DONE BY CHADWICK SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING DATED FEB. 16, 1994. PH LO d- N W I Q �___ ,\ I \\ \ I I �102' FILLI = 5 CY \ I ^ 84 CD CA I1 \ \ \ROCpI` F E 00 9" \ F V. 10 ' I N H. MAXp I Y \ 1 , C/') o LLJ 0 , I¢ �\ \\ ` �, I \ \fe I \ \ \ \ DECK\ I z I 80' 82' 4\ \ \ \ I D= 92.5 -- \ -- =1 3.0' \ \ \ \------------___ - -y-�- -�-%- -� \\ DECK 78, _ o i 24 24 LONG PE ROCKERY I � \ \ `— — — — — — — — — — — — � 01URk;�RB111 _ _ _ _ _ \ 10 FILL CY ILL = 10 CY \ i( 3j).—AZ 102' l� ROC \ \ \ \\ ROCKER 3 -0 H. MAX. \ \ O O 0 W\ 100.0 0 \ 78' 80, 82' 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 1 '-3" 1. 78'-9" // A ------ A—A TIT- S -fir„. 100' ARE/ 98, FILL 9 6' 9 4' 9 2' 90' 88' 86' 84' ARE, CUT AREA #2 AREA #3 FILL = 13 CY RLL = 25 CY 100' NORTH SITE PLAN 4 SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" (ACCEPTABLE TICHTLINE M4TERML N-12 ADS Sch 40 TM ®3034) SDR 35 (AS TM DATA: AREA #1: CUT = 43 CY AREA #2: FILL = 13 CY AREA #3: FILL = 25 CY AREA #4: CUT = 5 CY \ AREA #5: FILL = 10 CY ` DIFFERENCE: CUT/FILL = 0.0 CY ►REA #1 ,UT = 43 CY iiQ GRADING PLAN SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" NO.I DATE I DESCRIPPON BY REVISIONS NEW RESIDENCE 7118 174TH STREET S.W. EDMONDS, WA SITE PLAN WOOD WA Y ASSOCIATES, INC. DESIGN/BUILD COMPANY 11422 238TH STREET S.W. WOODWAY, WA 98020 (206) 546-6571 Project No. 94104 CADD File No. EDMONDS Drawn By RKK Checked By XXX Date 54.Z97 Copyright A-1 -7 z7z 97- iy8 STREET FILE