Loading...
7120 MEADOWDALE BEACH RD.PDFIIIIIIIIIIIIII 12312 7120 MEADOWDALE BEACH RD 1 CITY OF..EDMONDS. N91 _ ZA1971 � ANALYS,�S" CIVILIGEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING PERCOLATION TESTS. DRAINFIELD DESIGNS 3032NE 140th St.. Seattle. Wa. 98125 SUITE 106 dim 54 Mr. Ted Ebbinga 10622 64th P1. W. FILE. Mukilteo, Wa. 98275 Attention: Mr. Ebbinga and Interested Parties. July 20, 1997, Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT. Address: Approx. 7100 Meadowdale Beach Road, Edmonds, Wa. Legal: Lot 1, City of Edmonds SP No. S93-114 Recorded A.F. No. 9309150189 CEM Being a portion of Lot 7 of existing plat of Robindale. Dear Mr. Ebbinga, At your request, we have completed a field investigation of your project site to determine the nature and properties of the soils and.drainage conditions present at relevant locations for the proposed construction of a driveway and single family residence. The following is a written report describing and delineating the geologic features encountered, and providing conclusions and recommendations concerning grading, drainage, slope stability, seismicity, foundation preparation and soil retention. 1 Field Investigation: Our field investigation of the site was conducted from June 1, 1997 thru July 15, 1997, and consisted.of the following work: i 1: A transit, tape and stadia survey was performed to establish a baseline for determining locations and elevations of test holes and other relevant features. The survey line originates from existingcenterline monuments located 106.2 feet apart along 72nd Ave. W., and turns 24° 18' easterly from a station.on the southerly monument fora distance of 50 feet to a set hub near the top -:of the embankmen.t...An angle of 1120 '26' wasturned east- erly .from.the said.monument, and trail was brushed out along this bearing to form`'.�the.baseline shown as section C-D on the attached site plan.::=Base elevation was assumed by scaling from a topographic map of,,.,the proposed short plat (attached). 2: Spot elevations were established at stations along the baseline, and trail was brushed out along lines north and south of the proposed structure, as`.well as along a section through the slope above the proposed driveway, and in other locations useful for mapping the'site. I 3: A base map showing test hole locations and other relevant fea- tures was prepared using the baseline stations in conjunction I with tape, 90° prism, inclinometer and --rangefinder methods. 1 �— —"—' EARTH AN.;LYS/S Page Two 4: Eleven test holes were dug, logged and located in representativ( areas along the slope, and detailed logs of the existing cut banks were noted, including approximate age and angle of repose. Soils were logged according to color, texture, structure, and probable origin. 5: A tape and 90° prism survey was conducted in conjunction with ar optical level and stadia rod to establish contours at.two.foot: intervals and spot elevations.at driveway and footing locations`. 6.: A brief regional investigation of the site vicinity was perform- ed,.at which time springs, seeps, roadcuts, grading cuts, fills and soil exposures were identified and loacted. 7: An on site meting with the engineer and geologist was held to discuss findings and to consider conclusions and recom- mendations. Site Location and Description: The project site is located along a northeasterly facing terraced sideslope which is bounded along the northeast by Meadowdale Beach Road. Lot Two to the south is undisturbed within 40 feet of the subject lots south property line, with the exception of a sewer line insta- llation along a 10 foot easement. The sideslope to the north of the parcel, and west of Meadowdale Beach Road has a wet lower terrace, and an adjacent steep slope. Perched water appears in the ditch along this section. Vegetation here includes hydrophytes, and the geomorphology varies distinctly from the project site. The.northwest boundary of the site is adjacent to undeveloped land, with the exception of an old road grade trending southeasterly:., the sideslope. Two residential structures are located at some distance from the southwest property corner, and do not lie downslope of'any'proposed grading. A building envelope adjacent to the short plat and to the south is a cut and fill, with dry gravelly loamy sand exposed along a 40 foot section. the site,has been graded for road in several locations some decades,) ago as attested by the large red alders growing through the cuts. ✓egetation encountered on the site is a canopy of Red Alder at low- ar.elevations, mixed with Douglass Fir and scattered Western Red �edar at higher elevations. Native cherry, crabapple, laurel and EARTH ANAZY51Y 9 Page Three chestnut are also present in small numbers. The understory is pre- dominantly elderberry, with scattered salmonberry, thimbleberry, huckelberry, three varieties of blackberry, sword fern, nettles and cleavers. No hydrophytes were noted in the proposed grading areas. Site Geology and Soils: Strata encountered in regional exposures and in a review of local soils reports and the U.S.D.A. Soils map of the vicinity indicate the following vertical section: 1: The lowest strata encountered is anticipated to occur at con- siderable depth under the site, and outcrops at a much lower elevation in cuts along Meadowdale Beach Road. It is a glacio- lacustrine silt or silty clay which perches both seasonal and permanent ground water along a contact with overlying outwash sand. 2: Strata and soils encountered in the project site vicinity are a thick sequence of proglacial slightly gravelly medium sand. The sand is stratified at depth, and overlain with 2 to 4 feet of somewhat loose upper horizons. 3: Overlying the sand unit is a layer of lodgement till, with a gravelly sandy loam soil at the surface. This unit is reported to overly the sand (Lot 12 Eagles Crest soils report of 2-8-90, Twelker), and can be observed in exposures along 72nd Ave. W. Soils encountered on the project site tended to be of a generally uniform texture of slightly loamy, slightly gravelly medium sand which varies in structure with depth, being slightly loose in the upper 2 to.4 feet, but able to stand when dry in a vertical test hole; and grading to a stratified slightly compact, friable, loose- ly aggregated (soft) and .dry deposit. Mottled and seasonally saturated soils were encountered in test hole four (See attached site plan). Existing old roadcuts have sloughed to an approximate angle of 1:1, over a span of decades.. No indications of springs, seeps, unstable stratigraphic relation- ships or mass movement topography were encountered during our field investigation, however minor soil creep is anticipated in the upper soil horizons where sloping. More detailed soils information can be found in the attached soil logs. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on the foregoing information, it is our opinion from a geo- technical standpoint that the site can be developed essentially as EARTH ANALYS/S �UJ Page Four planned; if the following recommendations are applied: 1: As ditching along Meadowdale Beach Road has resulted in a devia- tion from the naturally stabilized grade, it is recommended that a grading plan be prepared which results in a minimum weight re- duction greater than the weight of the house and backfill-. This will reduce the driving forces along the lower slope, and produc increased stability. The encountered uncompacted sand deposit can be assumed to weigh 120 P.C.F. for this calculation. If -ex- cess material is generated, a stockpile area exists at a point south of the proposed driveway back around. 2: Any storm water produced by construction or the finished imper- vious areas .shall be conveyed away from the slope immediately below the house. This will prevent the lowering of shear strengt in the sideslope soils from pore pressures or piping of grains. 3: To reduce the potential.. -.for. -.sloughing and severe grades,.it is recommended that the finished floor elevation of the garage`; a ab;:: ,be. tat. e.leva.tion:.a '260`. 'feet ' b To achieve the necesary grade, it will be necessary to remove vegetation and loose upper soils' from the area to be under the slab and portions of the easterly footings. On site materials may be used as structural fill, placed into level keys in the recieving soil, and compacted to 85 to 90% density. A light vibratory compactor is recommended to prevent overcompaction. Optimal moisture content for the encountered very slightly loamy sand is 16%, with a range of 8 - 20%. Lifts of 8 to 10 inches of thickness are anticipated. An inspection of the compacive effort and footing excavations is recommended. 4: Cut banks below the proposed house or driveway are not recomm- ended, and unretained cuts for footings and driveway grade can be expected to slough to an angle of 1 vertically to 1.2 horiz- ontally over time. 5 -A safe allowable soil bearing pressure 500''P.S:FH can be assigned to the encountered strata, with no'i`ncrease`allowed due to seismic overturtning forces imposed on the soil. Foo'tirigs� `should extend aminimum soof iyls "a'1'orig the dwnhilh (.no.rth"easotf `er3T6 y=i)nchest. intoth'e'-'~'native section; anpa mxn mumd ntsfoirches2r.oh.4, arig­sect_!rons.. " All excavations should be cleared of sloughed or loose areas. An inspection of.compaction and footing excavations is recom- mended prior to pouring footings. Total and differential settlements are anticipated to be"-,,11--"and EARTH ANALY51Y 9 3/4;.inches respectively. Additional Comments: Page Five The proposed yard and driveway cuts and fills may be retained utilizing on site materials as fill for geogrid textile: -;cells, as the encountered slightly loamy sand is well drained, mostly free of dust and silt, and.will compact readily over a wide range of of moisture content. The installation of rockery or.retaining walls are also options for retaining the proposed driveway and yard cuts and fills, de- pending largely on economic and aesthetic considerations. Lateral earth forces against retaining walls or foundation walls may be calculated on the bqsis of an imaginary fluid having a density of;,'P.0 E' or P.C.F. where the'backfill is steeply.. sloping. The encountered subsoils can conservatively.be assigned the follow- ing values: 1: A *�41° Angle of internal friction. 2: An active soil pressure of 3 0 P.C.F. 3: A passive soil pressure of 93d'P.C.F'. , Stormwater disposal by installing a drywell or level spreader is f.eas.,ib;l,e n.: the encountered :wel drained soils. An application rate of.,- .2 gallons/square foot/day for trench bottom area is recommended,.based on the soil texture. The conclusions and recommendations presented herein are profes- sional opinions. These opinions are based on generally accepted geotechnical principles and practice, and no other warranty is expressed or implied. We trust that the foregoing information is adequate for your purposes at this time, and appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you need additional information or clarification, please call. icerely, -th Analysis .pared by: Allan Fay, Geo19ist A ►iewed and approved by: N.H. Letinen, P.E. IM EARTH ANALYS/S • �UJ Page Six The followingpages p g append and conclude this: report: Page 6 &7: Soil logs. Page 8: Site plan. showing '`,test.,hole.-locations and Generalized geologic sections Page 9: Grading area•topography. Page 10: Base map copy. SOIL LOGS: Test No: Depth: Soils..encountered: SL1: 0-4': Medium. -sand, `.very slightly.loamy / gravelly, medium brown, slightly loose,.stands vertically, dry, non stratified. 4-5': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, light brown,. .:friable, stands vertically, dry stratified. SL2: 0-3': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, medium brown, slightly loose, stands t 800, dry, non stratified, roots. 3-5': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, light brown,.:friable, stands vertically, dry. 5-8': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, light greyish`.brown, friable, moderately compact, stratified, dry. 3: 0-6': Medium sand, ,,very slightly loamy / gravelly, medium brown,''friable, stands vertically, dry, uniform,..grades'�'moderately_compact. 4: 0-4': Loamy sand,.grading to medium sand, slightly . loamy / gravelly, -'light reddish brown,moderate- ly compact to==firm, dry. 4-5': Loamy.sand and.�gravel, moderately compact to firm grey, Water at ;' 52'' . 5: 0-3' Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly,. medium reddish -:brown, slightly loose, stands t80°,.dry, non stratified, roots. 3-5' Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, occasional cobble., light brown, friable, stands vertically, dry. .m EARTH ANALY51Y Test No: Depth: SL6: 0-3': 3-5': 5-9': Page Seven Soils encountered: Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly;':.. medium brown, slightly loose, stands dry, non stratified, roots. - Medium sand,.very slightly loamy / gravelly,`. light brown, barely friable, stands vertically, dry:: Medium.,sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly; light greyish brown, friable, grading.moderately compact, stratified, dry. SL7: 0=8': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, medium brown, friable, stands vertically,,. uniform, grades moderately compact, dry. SL8: 0-6': Medium sand,, slightly loamy / very slightly gravelly, light reddish brown, cohesiv.e,'stands undercut, firm, very slightly moist. SL9: 0-4': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, light brown, moderately compact, graded surface, stratified, dry. SL10: 0-2': Gravelly sand, slightly loamy, loose. 2-5': Gravelly sand, slightly loamy, light greyish brown, stands vertically, dry. SL11: 0-3': Gravelly sand, slightly loamy, medium brown, loose to barely friable, stands vertically, dry. Gravelly sand, slightly loamy, light brown,* friable, stands vertically, stratified, dry. .W EARTH ANALY51Y I- ' J+� GRADING AREA TOPOGRAPHY: SCALE•. 1"- '. CONTOURS: 2.Ilk ) N ` N •� • a0 MH . Pv ` Nto N t,N O p \ N \`\ J\ � • b � d Vie`!•/N / to ro KEY TO SYMBOLS: �t e O TBM..TOP OF MH ASSIGNED ELEV. 24 0. 7 ' \U 'to N �\ N FOdTING LOCATION. N ' ----- - EDGE OF DRIVEWAY. FOUND YELLOW FLATTIE. ° FLAG. ADDER W. 215.92' �3 fib? _ EAR H A T NAL Y S/S CIVIL/GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING PERCOLATION TESTS. DRAINFIELD DESIGNS 3032NE 140th St., Seattle. We. 98125 SUITE 106 3641054 -7- STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION'SYSTEM WORKSHEE T: 1. I kd; All't 41OV -CA1,C BY: ADDRESS L PHONE: Ki 0 776--0,366 -Lys N- '-'6!D"*'- 9- W 0 --W A, 9 1562, (P DAM, DESIGN DATA IMPERVIOUS -AREA" •7 PIPE DIA i PIPE LG ORIFICE 20' zt, RNA ELEV. rwN CO VER'. ' ' WAX emu &%—MSL0PE F -4ruft SPACE -CONTROL =4=91 - OUTLET &OPER CA M�ff COMMOL CAMM &AS,- OASW ( -T site. yp§ SYSTEM CROSS SECTION lql, L 4owrs i3r-rwr-co '-P(Pc- 6. 9 APPROVED AS NOTED -'r 0 PIPE Not A-& RIFM �/R FROM CONTROL OUTLET VTFWN CH MIN KY LONG 0 BE LEVEL - TOP 4PER� PIPE I PERFPUIFE W/CAPS FF SPREAD OUTLET Xx 2x 6" 4"-Ir QUARRY WALLS 2 DEEP, -3/4-.01WHEO ROCK FOOTING DRAINS SHALL -NOT BE CONNECTED 70 DETENTION SYSTEM NOTES: 1. am Engineering Division (77 1-9=).for a tigh#iqe and detention system inspection before back" and for final inspecti6ns. APPROVED BY 2, Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on prb;ili property is the --respons7ibility.pf the property owner. Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed llow p per.op'eration. The outlet control orifice PATE must be kept 'Oe. from the catch basins to aat all -times: REV 2 /9 2 6 I,iZO Wl��a'x� 6,eaGh City of Edmonds Building Dept. Oct. 2, 1997 0 - A meeeting was held between the undersigned to review and discuss the final plans for site grading, building placement, and foundation detail of the proposed single family residence to be constructed at 7120 Meadowdale Beach Rd. The principle reason for this meeting is to verify that the submitted plans do reflect the statements and concerns. -expressed in the Geotech's report submitted by Earth Analysis, and those of the P.E., H. Nick Lehtinen. The garage slab elevation shall be ZSh �/ / 7ToCeA4Itc r )— Geotech and/or Engineer inspection of work in pro Fari'TIAt— eyc ova -T ionJS %2OUGN- C.11,aa a p A TU " P.0UA t V-b- /coo T � ✓� a- S ress shall be _ n 1 „ /9 C Cr Cv gC-ri v Cl- o�Fvti/�t PA / O mot. T O Po I 6",n I - Other comments i) 5 T�� G v 'T o n.1c,, / ,a L 5/ of 5 T b ,t e C i e vr- /4 L._ 2) ADO /ZO ' T/CGr- rkytir / GOo Vc- /,'�A4ow4.s�v- i°yCrOci,c Ac"44 ' l31400s2 d D2/v l/coNC, pA. e"Dl1VouOS 'PQ-C. S ) 3 / /?.L�rfl , ",,Vc . 44,.4 G (_ ro. n- G V 7- ee 009 -1- *V-- /g L O Aw C— A I V ef -A..2 A Fnqn- 4/4iwi.ti4-- SA40L7G/J(s•,_ (.O^{��4cT___ u/�6o_�c� __ cJiv�e�i► Q Aiuc•c�i4-� �AV CS��C/F'TS �85"-70 av/r7W m6-d1v41 Sltrq 'Coaip.+c7-ten.. 7o gP." S 1a&"C/F'1a 4 r0 wA V4- / S7- /NS�ecr.o IV . .R o ic, P i N 5-4 c rl B ,t.► i9-r 12,9 <jz-14 C. v 7- /ti 5,o Ere�- �6(1n. 7-y l ry 5,oe�7' c.c/f �o Te2N 7) ?L.A-CL.c� _S 1�L S- FI LTr�✓L OWN ST 2 r� p NN 'Aj 0 ►Z IL Allen C. Fay / E nalysis . Nick Lehtinen / P.E. Melanie Ervin / 'Owner 7 ed Ebbinga / DGfter 0 Damian Ervin / Owner AS 4 m " gym► Z / 0 L ,O 6-P T —PISS o�T�^'1�"" •' rI 14011ew p 141/*VJ 4/toll GET PJ 03 PERMIT CDU City of Edmonds Building Department 121 5th Ave. North Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Attention: Subject: EARTH AXALYSIS June 24, 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY GiEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS ORAINFIELO DESIGNS 3032 N.E. 140TH st 106 SEATTLE. WA. 98125 (206) 364 X054 Janine .Graf or Interested Parties. Special Inspection (Geotechnical) of Residential Construction Site. Edmonds Plan Check #: 97-260 Site Address: 7120 Meadowdale Beach Road. Dear Ms. Graf, Submitted herewith for your review and approval is a special inspection report per your letter of September 19, 1997, Page one, item 2, and as proposed per our letter of response, dated October 2, 1997. Our initial inspection was conducted on December 12, 1997, and consisted of an evaluation of soils exposed in the rough grade and the nature, volume and placement of the spoils. A videotape of the cut and vicinity was shot, relevant elevations were verified, and site drainage was noted.. No unstable stratigraphic relationships or signs of seepage were noted in the cut for house, driveway or storm water retention excavations. No mottled or fine grained soils were noted in the spoil pile. The spoil pile placement and volume was as anticipated for proper weight balance along the slope and in the area recommended. No potential erosion or sedimentation problems were observed. The proper elevations and slope angles were verified. An intirim inspection was conducted on January 4 and January 5, 1998, at which time the compactive effort to the recieving soils underlying the proposed footings was evaluated for density, moisture content, elevation, and probed for loose areas as required. At this time, it was determined that the compactive effort was satisfactory for the design load, and that the construction sequence was in order, with the tile front installed, and no indications of instability in the slope between the house and Meadowdale Beach Road. Storm water runoff from the compacted areas was diverted away from the sideslope, and proper erosion and sedimentation control was in place. Our final inspection was on April 26, 1998, at which time soils underlying the proposed driveway and garage slab were inspected for compaction, backfill and -finished grades were inspected for density and finished slope angle. .4m - EARTHANW JV$/S Page Two No loose or unstable areas were identified during the inspection of soils underlying the driveway area and the proposed garage slab. Backfill behind the uphill (western) foundation wall was found to be loose and free draining as specified. Soils and drainage conditions exposed by grading operations on the project site are essentially as anticipated per our soils report of July 20, 1997. It is our opinion that the grading, drainage, slope stability and compaction requirements stated in our Geotechnical Investigation Report and in the subsequent inspections of the work in progress have been adequately complied with at this time. We trust that the foregoing information is adequate for your purposes. If you need additional Information or clarification, please call, Sincerely, Earth L Analysis Allan C. Fay, /� ist. Reviewed and approved by: N.H. Lehtinen, P.E. EARTHAMMS/S CITY OF EDMONDS FAR771 ANALY5,T IIf CIVIL IGEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING f PERCOLATION TESTS. DRAiNFIELD DESIGNS Jul 2C 1 997 ' 3032NE 140th St., Seattle, We. 98125 SUITE 106 y , j 3641054 Mr. Ted Ebbinga 1 10622 64th P1. W. CITY COPY Mukilteo, Wa. 98275 AUG 18 1997 Attention: Mr. Ebbinga and Interested Parties. I I Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT. i Address: Approx. 7100 Meadowdale Beach Road, Edmonds, Wa. Legal: Lot 1, City of Edmonds SP No. S93-114 Recorded A.F. No. 9309150189 $eing a portion of Lot 7 of existing plat of Robindale. 1 Dear Mr. Ebbinga, {At your request, we have completed a field investigation of your project site to determine the nature and properties of the soils and drainage conditions present at relevant locations for the proposed construction of a driveway and single family residence. I The following is a written report describing and delineating the + geologic features encountered, and providing conclusions and I recommendations concerning grading, drainage, slope stability, seismicity, foundation preparation and soil retention. Field Investigation: Our field investigation of the site was conducted from June 1, 1997 thru July 15, 1997, and consisted of the following work: i 1: A transit, tape and stadia survey was performed to establish a t baseline for determining locations and elevations of test holes and other relevant features.,The survey line originates from existing centerline monuments located 106.2 feet apart along I 72nd Ave. W., and turns 24° 18' easterly from a station on the jsoutherly monument fora distance of 50 feet to a set hub near i the top of the embankment. An angle of 112° 26' was turned east- erly from.the said monument, and trail was brushed out along _ this bearing to form the baseline shown as section C-D on the } attached site plan. Base elevation was assumed by scaling from a topographic map of the proposed short plat (attached). 2: i Spot elevations were established at stations along the baseline, I and trail was brushed out along lines north and south of the proposed structure, as well as along a section through the slope j above the proposed.driveway, and in other locations useful for mapping the site. I 3: A base map showing test hole locations and other relevant fea- tures was prepared using the baseline stations in conjunction with tape, 90° prism, inclinometer and.rangefinder methods. i I EARTH AN.;LY515 I Page Two 4: Eleven test holes were dug, logged and located in representativE areas along the slope, and detailed logs of the existing cut banks were noted, including approximate age and angle of repose. Soils were logged according to color, texture, structure, and probable origin. 5: A tape and 900 prism survey was conducted in conjunction with an optical level and stadia rod to establish contours at two foot intervals and spot elevations at driveway and footing locations. 6: A brief regional investigation of the site vicinity was perform- ed, at which time springs, seeps, roadcuts, grading cuts, fills and soil exposures were identified and loacted. 7: An on site meting with the engineer and geologist was held to discuss findings and to consider conclusions and recom- mendations. Site Location and Description: The project site is located along a northeasterly facing terraced sideslope which is bounded along the northeast by Meadowdale Beach Road. Lot Two to the south is undisturbed within 40 feet of the subject lots south property line, with the exception of a sewer line insta- llation along a 10 foot easement. The sideslope to the north of the parcel, and west of Meadowdale Beach Road has a wet lower terrace, and an adjacent steep slope. Perched water appears in the ditch along this section. Vegetation here includes hydrophytes, and the geomorphology varies distinctly from the project site. The northwest boundary of the site is adjacent to undeveloped land, with the exception of an old road grade trending southeasterly up the sideslope. Two residential structures are located at some distance from the southwest property corner, and do not lie downslope of any proposed grading. A building envelope adjacent to the short plat and to the south is a cut and fill, with dry gravelly loamy sand exposed along a 40 foot section. The site.has been graded for road in several locations some decades ago as attested by the large red alders growing through the cuts. } Vegetation encountered on the site is a canopy of Red Alder at low- er elevations, mixed with Douglass Fir and scattered Western Red Cedar at higher elevations. Native cherry, crabapple, laurel and EARTH ANALYSIS Page Three chestnut are also present in small numbers. The understory is pre- dominantly elderberry, with scattered salmonberry, thimbleberry, huckelberry, three varieties of blackberry, sword fern, nettles and cleavers. No hydrophytes were noted in the proposed grading areas. Site Geology and Soils: Strata encountered in regional exposures and in a review of local soils reports and the U.S.D.A. Soils map of the vicinity indicate the following vertical section: 1: The lowest strata encountered is anticipated to occur at con- siderable depth under the site, and outcrops at a much lower elevation in cuts along Meadowdale Beach Road. It is a glacio- lacustrine silt or silty clay which perches both seasonal and permanent ground water along a contact with overlying outwash sand. 2: Strata and soils encountered in the project site vicinity are a thick saquence of proglacial slightly gravelly medium sand. The sand is stratified at depth, and overlain with 2 to 4 feet of somewhat loose upper horizons. 3: Overlying the sand unit is a layer of lodgement till, with a gravelly sandy loam soil at the surface. This unit is reported to overly the sand (Lot 12 Eagles Crest soils report of 2-8-90, Twelker), and can be observed in exposures along 72nd Ave. W. Soils encountered on the project site tended to be of a generally uniform texture of slightly loamy, slightly gravelly medium sand which varies in structure with depth, being slightly loose in the upper 2 to 4 feet, but able to stand when dry in a vertical test hole; and grading to a stratified slightly compact, friable, loose- ly aggregated (soft) and dry deposit. Mottled and seasonally saturated soils were encountered in test hole four (See attached site plan). . Existing old roadcuts have sloughed to an approximate angle of 1:1, over a span of decades. No indications of springs, seeps, unstable stratigraphic relation- ships or mass movement topography were encountered during our field investigation, however minor soil creep is anticipated in the upper soil horizons where sloping. More detailed soils information can be found in the attached soil logs. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on the foregoing information, it is our opinion from a geo- technical standpoint that the site can be developed essentially as EARTH ANALYRY Page Four planned; if the following recommendations are applied: 1: As ditching along Meadowdale Beach Road has resulted in a devia- tion from the naturally stabilized grade, it is recommended that a grading plan be prepared which results in a minimum weight re- duction greater than the weight of the house and backfill. This will reduce the driving forces along the lower slope, and produc increased stability. The encountered uncompacted sand deposit can be assumed to weigh 120 P.C.F. for this calculation. If ex- cess material is generated, a stockpile area exists at a point south of the proposed driveway back around. 2: Any storm water produced by construction or the finished imper- vious areas shall be conveyed away from the slope immediately below the house. This will prevent the lowering of shear streng in the sideslope soils from pore pressures or piping of grains. 3: To reduce the potential for sloughing and severe grades, it is recommended that the finished floor elevation of the garage slab be at elevation ± 260 feet. To achieve the necesary grade, it will be necessary to remove vegetation and loose upper soils from the area to be under the slab and portions of the easterly footings. On site materials may be used as structural fill, placed into level keys in the recieving soil, and compacted to 85 to 90% density. A light vibratory compactor is recommended to prevent overcompaction. Optimal moisture content for the encountered very slightly loamy sand is 16%, with a range of 8 - 20%. Lifts of 8 to 10 inches of thickness are anticipated. An inspection of the compacive effort and footing excavations is recommended. 4: Cut banks below the proposed house or driveway are not recomm- ended, and unretained cuts for footings and driveway grade can be expected to slough to an angle of 1 vertically to 1.2 horiz- ontally over time. 5: A safe allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 P.S.F. can be assigned to the encountered strata, with no increase allowed due to seismic overturtning forces imposed on the soil. Footings should extend a minimum of 36 inches into the native soils along the downhill (northeasterly) section, and a minimum of 24 inches into the native soils for the remaining sections. All excavations should be cleared of sloughed or loose areas. An inspection of compaction and footing excavations is recom- mended prior to pouring footings. Total and differential settlements are anticipated to be 112 and EARTH ANALY51Y I Page Five 3/4 inches respectively. Additional Comments: The proposed yard and driveway cuts and fills may be retained utilizing on site materials as fill for geogrid textile cells, as the encountered slightly loamy sand is well drained, mostly free of dust and silt, and will compact readily over a wide range of of moisture content. The installation of rockery or retaining walls are also options for retaining the proposed driveway and yard cuts and fills, de- pending largely on economic and aesthetic considerations. Lateral earth forces against retaining walls or foundation walls may be calculated on thejsis of an imaginary fluid having a density of �O P.C.F. or P.C.F. where the backfill is steeply. sloping. The encountered subsoils can conservatively be assigned the follow- ing values: 1: A 320 Angle of internal friction. 2: An active soil pressure of 3 0 P.C.F. 3: A passive soil pressure of 33 o P.C.F. Stormwater disposal by installing a drywell or level spreader is feasible in the encountered well drained soils. An application rate of 1.2 gallons/square foot/day for trench bottom area is recommended, based on the soil texture. The conclusions and recommendations presented herein are profes- sional opinions. These opinions are based on generally accepted geotechnical principles and practice, and no other warranty is expressed or implied. We trust that the foregoing information is adequate for your purposes at this time, and appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you need additional information or clarification, please call. Sincerely, Earth Analysis pared by: Allan Fay, Geologist', am'-� /� a, ) -A 0� iewed and approved by: N.H. Letinen, P.E. EARTH ANALYS/S I Page Six The following pages append and conclude this report: Page 6 &7: Soil logs. age 8: Site plan showing test hole locations and Generalized geologic sections. Page 9: Grading area topography. Page 10: Base map copy. SOIL LOGS: Test No: Depth: Soils encountered: SL1: 0-4': Medium -sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, medium brown, slightly loose,.stands vertically, dry, non stratified. 4-5': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, light brown, friable, stands vertically,.dry stratified. SL2: 0-3': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, medium brown, slightly loose, stands ± 80°, dry, non stratified, roots. 3-5': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, light brown, friable, stands vertically, dry. 5-8': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, light greyish brown, friable, moderately compact, stratified, dry. SL3: 0-6': Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, medium brown, friable, stands vertically, dry, uniform, grades moderately compact. SL4: 0-4': Loamy sand, grading to medium sand, slightly loamy / gravelly, light reddish brown, moderate- ly compact to firm, dry. 4-5': Loamy sand and gravel, moderately compact to firm grey, Water at 52". 3L5: 0-3' Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, medium reddish brown, slightly loose, stands ±800, dry, non stratified, roots. 3-5' Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, occasional cobble, light brown, friable, stands vertically, dry. 1= EARTH ANALY515 �UJ Test No: Depth: SL6: 0-3': 3-5': 5-9' : . SL7: 0-8': SL8: 0-6': SL9: 0-4': SL10: SW 1 : 9 E Page Seven Soils encountered: Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, medium brown, slightly loose, stands ± 750, dry, non stratified, roots. Medium sand,.very slightly loamy / gravelly, light brown, barely friable, stands vertically, dry.. Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, light greyish brown, friable, grading moderately compact, stratified, dry. Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, medium brown, friable, stands vertically, uniform, grades moderately compact, dry. Medium sand,. slightly loamy / very slightly gravelly, light reddish brown, cohesive, stands undercut, firm, very slightly moist. Medium sand, very slightly loamy / gravelly, light brown, moderately compact, graded surface, stratified, dry. 0-2': Gravelly sand, slightly loamy, loose. 2-5': Gravelly sand, slightly loamy, light greyish brown, stands vertically, dry. 0-3': Gravelly sand, slightly loamy, medium brown, loose to barely friable, stands vertically, dry. 3-5': Gravelly sand, slightly loamy, light brown, friable, stands vertically, stratified, dry. N EARTH ANALY51Y N N 9 GRADING AREA TOPOGRAPHY: 1 SCALE: 1:2 .o CONTOURS:2' y�6 \ 1 \ ` O�� N •(5' 00 N� ry \ \ N �cn _.�Dv .n \\ \ \ e N, KEY TO SYMBOLS: O TBM. TOP OF MH_ASSIGNED \ N` \ ELEV . 240.7 � N FOOTING LOCATION. ----- - EDGE OF DRIVEWAY. o FOUND YELLOW FLATTIE. FLAG. ALDER. FIR.., W. 215.92' DA, EARTH ANAZYS/S CIVILIGEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING PERCOLATION TESTS. DRAINFIELD DESIGNS 3032NE 140th St.. Seattle. We. 99125 SUITE 106 3641034 SITE IMPROVEMENT BOND RELEASE FORM To: Lara Knaak, Pery it / Coordinator FROM: �� (,cam �Z� ENGINEERING INSPECTOR PLEASE SIGN PLANNING DIVISION DATE: om SENT TO ON PERMIT# ` _ ADB# PROJECT PROJECT I-C TYPE OF BOND TO BE RELEASED V % iI V BOND DATE POSTED S —27 I — G�S v BOND EXPIRES Please field inspect at your earliest convenience for the release of the subject bond. If there are outstanding requirements, please note in the space provided. Failure to respond by the noted bond expiration date constitutes Department approval and automatic release of the bond. It is each Department's responsibility to contact the developer/owner when outstanding issues prevent the release of the bond. Please copy the Permit Coordinator on all City correspondence sent regarding this bond. X BOND IS APPROVED FOR RELEASE BOND IS NOT APPROVED - OUTSTANDING REQUIREMENTS NOTED 1. 2. 3. WORK TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN DAYS SUSPENSE TO COPY TO FILE RECEIVED COPY TO DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR APR ` 61999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Ltemp:b1dg;f6rms;bondre17/98 jln 15 i S Sm tfwJ I N-ire vc fiqa�(csWc c(' Qwo-e& -tz) I�,P C" (��vYt�fr 1 vine-� SrM.�c�e {v kit_ 4-- 101LOINK City of Edmonds IttG b\991 Building Department Pv6 sole Attn: Jim Walker- 0�G`�� Dear Sir, AUG IS 1997 co, I100-7 0 K Ot/ We are submitting plans that detail the construction of a small single;' family residence'on a lot in north Edmonds. The lot was created a V few years ago by splitting a larger lot into 2 parcels. During the short platting proceedure and the Preliminary Review of Proposed Short Subdivision (see attached), the statements and conclusions made by city staff, stressed the need to preserve as many trees and other vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize the overall grading effort. We concur with those statements and conclusions. In support of the city's position, we are requesting relief on the driveway's incline to a maximum of 20% grade. This increase will allow the house to be relocated and shorten the driveway by approx. 20'. The benefit to the city is the preservation of additional trees and vegetation area, an -25% reduction in site disturbance for that driveway, and a reduction in impervious surface area. The benefit for the owners / developers are; a shorter backing distance from the house to the remote situated turn -around, and possibly some reduction in driveway construction cost. F Thank You for your consideration of this request. Owners; Melanie & Damian .Ervin 706-212th PL. SW. Lynnwood, Wa. 98036 Melanie Ery 7-1-I-q-7 Damian Ervin g—►7 —97 CITY COPY -_ CITYDF-EDMONDS. - __�_-- = :=.REM -.OF-SHORT SUBDIVISION -° . HF-- This is to certify that the properties as shown 'on the attached map (Exhibit "A")=and:-_- described as follows, See Exhibit "B° - ----- - -have-been-divided -under: ,the. -provisions -of -the Edmonds-SubdivisionOrdinance ;(Sect= 20.75) File No S-93-114 subject to the following conditions and requirements Exhibit C, Hold Harmless No tree clearing is allowed on the site without a tree clearing permit approved by the City of Edmonds. A tree clearing plan approved with a building permit will' . be allowed in lieu of a tree clearing permit. No tree clearing shall be allowed for the sake of future development without first obtaining an approved building permit with an approved clearing plan. The property shall not be terraced for the sake of creating yard space. A proposed house should be designed to accommodate the steep slope and the natural forestation of the site. Decks will be allowed as part of the house design in lieu of the terracing of slopes. 5 Setbacks shown on the map are for reference only and vest no right. 1.1 we verify that I / we are the legal owner(s) of tiie property described above. I / we warrant that all representations are true and correct and understand that in the event of any misrepresentation or failure to comply with the conditions and regulations set forth herein, the City of Edmonds shall have the right .to declare that subdivisions void and record a statement to that effect in the Grantor -Grantee's Index in -the office of the Snohomish County Auditor. Signed: STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this da personally appeared before me 'P.1.1. ( c��/ n ; (,- ;� ( , -.� to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed —the within and foregoing instrumen , and acknowledged that _ r c. , signed the same as p, ( '. . j free'and voluntary acf�nd deed, for the uses and mimoses therein mentioned 4. Flag lot determination: No flag lots will be created by thisproposal. 5. Consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance? Yes 6. Zoning: The subject property is zoned RS-20 (single residential with a minimum 20;000 square foot:lot Size - requirement). F. CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -I.-- -Conforms to -the -policies of the Comprehensive Plan?- Yes.------ __-- -- ---- ----- G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1. Is this site identified on the Citys Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map? No. -2. —Is an -Environmental -Checklist Required for this"application?-No: - - -`"--- - --" - - H_ REVIEWil 1. Critical Areas Review number: CA-93-37 2. Results of Critical Areas Review: A Conditional Waiver was granted. The �. conditions of the waiver can be found in Attachment 5. 3. Other conditions relating to the Critical.Areas: The subject property slopes down to Meadowdale Beach Road at a slope between 40% and 60%. The intent of the Critical Areas Ordinance is to preserve these steep slopes in as natural a state as possible. Therefore the applicant will be required to identify a proposed driveway location. In addition, all future development shall be done in a manner to preserve the maximum number of trees on site. The property shall not be terraced or filled for the sake of creating a yard. I. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATIONS 1. Engineering, drainage and street dedications: See City Engineer's Report (see Attachment 4). 2. Parks or other facilities? None . II. PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed 2-lot short subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1. Engineering Division conditions listed on Attachment 4 2. No tree clearing shall be allowed without a tree clearing permit, unless the trees present a hazard to the health, safety and welfare of the public. 3. No clearing shall be done for the sake of future development. 4. The property shall not be terraced for the sake of creating yard space. A proposed house should be designed to accommodate the steep slope and the natural forestaion of the site. Decks will be allowed as part of the house design in lieu of the terracing of the slope. BY: John Bissell DATE: 08/02/93 smiia.noc 2or 3 771 Co mry) Lj-n �u�ild.+r1 �1�1S1arl LoC) ®c:�be,p ;Q , Iqq-] RECEIVES) O C T 2 3 1997 PERMIT COUNTER -}-he Wners dcr-str�.�d and ac.ce.p-f- t-'-e-S Pon s i b i I f i-y -co r the- proPcx+-Y l o e olicd CLt 1 I a O (Y1 c�j 0 W t�1 C B a_c -{�o _j �c� mcmds , �i/C— q goau p m c1 an i e Erve I'''1 D a.m i aj-\ ErVi rl ■ OWudnstdlas,LtL ', OY%PlWC4mx,l= DS422-WO Z.9 ZI`� s' a-oPoc,�c1PHy "DAr.4 3''� aCAJINGO -2Y- SOMRCt E� EA2T,/ ANAL sis i?EPoar 1 EAaTH gaALYS, /iF14F/T ox- %o" = 3/. 7 I 3_0 / / 2� .c" = / 7. 6' / a os / / / 2= I`fE/4NT 'D" 3Z.5' s00 295 -� 2 f2S= q q.; is T I'/ SOT 25,�20 SF /3 ACRE ffONSE 89L SF (3% of Lo-r\ / \ 2-t� � fi�F/b.YT 9BOdt� Gj• � ''� /q/i/3/ S /1\ '— � I " .. - `�' _°._� :: - .fir ,_ -.. ,'�i / •...� � /60 �- �- i - �•i• �— � .� _ -'- _'=�'--z ! �,�.�.�_�-�.�/1 I�� y PTiF�2 NTi_l.J T1EC ! � / I - ca t 72ooG-D/t s Ns / I ' uaOEhyReuuo - l / i 'Yalta- i(;eo TrxTi1 FKLr 47.25/ I �QD449 SYGTGM _Q .�/SiSM.. \�P - f�SIDRAM- .7. 6el .3 i CULVERT _ i _- LOT 1` !V ,------�� SCALE; „--PAGT�t R>_S I D F- H6,GNT CALLS -- I X2 INI�ADocl)17A�F )3FACH Rom. MAIL60V D4>4.N -2-(s)M14 31 j_DVI/InNDs, uJ�#. 9g�2� •. AUG 18 1997 CITY COPY • - STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM �. WORKSHEET - OWNER - CALL BY: ADDRESS D - Z I Z L PHONE: DATE: .."DESIGN DA TA IMPERVIOUS AREA'' PIPE DIA ;' PIPE LG ORIFICE , v. DETENTION VIDE LENGTH WASI1E0 T GAVE z 0 - - LONG PNDPRF PEO.SE LEVEL ' , FROM MIN COVER . 4rMNL SF%CE 1 V - RIM ELEV• ,- . 2•MAX COVER :. •j s .'- `' RM ELEV ^' • r CONTROL E OUTLET 4` • . I / I =1- .. . MINEW INV ELE'W244'a„ MA°ER CA7CW coA?ROY CATCH eArn ensav (C -,T"yP� I L� SYSTEM CROSS SECTION`,-.'1` ,. /9LL SD(uTS (3wEE.0 j�tPE ; ,¢NO C, 6. r _rY 4LL W/ M02ib2, APPROVED AS NOTED " 4` • FIFE MIN... • • { .. . �-- "i-0' ROaDSI.DG 21it, by :+ 'PIPE w/CAPS RUNOFF SPREAD OUTLET FROM CONTROL OUTLET FOOTING DRAINS` SIIALL.NOT BE CONNECTED TO DETENTION SYSTEM NOTES= _ 1. Call Engineering Division (771-0220) ,for : a tightline and detention system inspection before backfilling and for final inspections. APPROVED BY , 2. Responsibility for operation and.maintenanceof drainage systems on private propertyls the responsibility of the property owner.. Material -accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out.and removed from the catch basins to allow proper. operation. The outlet control orifice DATE must be k t o at all•times. REV 2/92 6 " RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 9712030608 121 5th Avenue North 12/03/97.. 16: 57 p.0005 Recorded Edmonds, WA 98020 Snohomish County COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEVINIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference #: Grantoe(s)• (1) ,:�:r.a.,��''� (2) Ple�:�^'�''''� "` Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec R TwnRng�'�tr S v✓ �j OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 0 SO 067010om_ (2) Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY: J2-6 DATE: t PAGE I OF Under the review procedures established pursuant to, the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City, of, Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: DATE: 10110197 PAGE Z. OF 1. Description of Subject Property. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of (insert. street address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: LiD E 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the.City of Edmonds as having'a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The .risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to, obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number Coo 8 S .9 (insert I number) on file with the City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or, prohibitions on, development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of N APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: -)Z4 DATE:10Z-7/, PAGE OF 5' the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Planning Department, City of Edmonds,. M 5th Avenue _/I North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive: any and all liability associated with development, stating that they have, fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and :relinquish any and all causes of action against " the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS. on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: -)Z,67 DATE: /01 9� PAGE OF arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. insurance Requirement In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director has/l ry)(t (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests ..or any -other person "or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: X6 DATE: PAGE OF DONE this day of 1997. OWNER(S) STATE OF WASHINGTON .(� ) ss: COUNTY o I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 4, A, ow v twn,,L, yv 1 h signed this instrument and iY acknowledged it to be free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this da '1997-- SIR NOTARY PUBLIC V10, WAS My commission expires: PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST 7� PROJECT NAME:,vPLAN GHECK #:��'(' j, � PROJECT ADDRESS: U Y(/► U 1 R CEIPT DATE: b REVIEW D BY: tI nitial/Da e) I.BLDG. PLAN.' WATER COMMENTS FIRE SEWER STREET ENG., . Setbacks/Variance/Setback Adjustment , •22:cr:G '•••. `ui ..aF%i,:`.•f.•:::•.,•.,•.x'{{C.i��'F.'i}✓.'Si.F S`i ::: ``i:`f .} .:. Conditional Use Permit k�:;,}<,�;<:�>�: ,>;�„��Y?:.;• :�%�. •'$ ; :?':�xn�v >�, M :} f.$n r`w 2 ADB Requirements } :;..;::. 3 Other Zoning Requirements;"_.>> .t ff.{Y`1 .:x+.:i•:>.J r?%�•ii:, •''•iY'{i Underground Wiring Required 5 Lot Slope 1 S% ';n.v . s? }" r SEPA Environmental Check-list/Hydraulics Permit '><< f 2....{:wt� Y <. 7 Tree Cutting Plan Plat/Subdivision Requirements �fr��>:'�>f�� :>�r:�.w::vft. 9 Legal Description Verification ' •� •'h'�{�.�::�Y�:� `� +���v.� �4N>< �;�>;>:�y.v 10 Quit Claim/Street DedicationsY:":::.. r:';:.nf'Y" <""•> •?> 11 Easements - Public Private > Engineering Storm Drain Review Fee �a ,<,;:;<>:��s::< :: ><::r:<<::::r"'mh?%.;`�'r'%r':':`:>�•`:••>3%�>•};�:�:���k:".. ,�r; , ,?' f :g}��5}w}p,,<•,'•'•.:G �r''y . '• �•`:'^'14 •rkw.vv ;�. -:1 . 3 Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee v �� w .. J'�`..}r;•Y: Drainage Plan On -Site �.�:;� 4 �:��.�� :' � ,� }�>��''�"�'�'`•3�•> 15 Setback - Top of Bank, Stream Water Courses ��?�"'a '�'.•:;:'• ;;r,: •�%' Setback - Storm Drain Line <• """ # h >:<;.:,:,:.;:;< w:.:; { ; i : }• Open Ditch - Existin Y. •.... Culvert Required :,:f : >...... <; sy fi ..: : : ,ff�� Culvert Size 20: : Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff •�' .�>;�•'}•..•: 22 _.' Catch Basin Required «f : f,;<:,r,.:,:�}•.;;:,' <<x Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access Sidewalk Required { $ •' ""`f r-i Curb &Gutter Required :. ...: Curb Cut For Driveway Required ."•.;";?.•{:•.• ` M;wr<ri<w;:> '• Street PavingRequired .hx�1}•.• -.7 Right -Of -Way Construction Permit Required Street Name Sign Required Other Signing Required _Y `°' } % 30 Bond Required For Public Improvements F }4r::` f><:::+:;<": ;" :r:<•x:,<>k.'31 FEMA Map Check/Water Table Side Sewer Availability r:• < } Y > f Calculate Sewer Connection Fee If No LID # „<t:?`.+ , :}k ,..,?. .; ::. •; 34:-- Create Street File `>£ • 4"� 36;:; Existing Water Main Size:.: Water Meter Size Y'}xk?!} { :}]tYi 4 j FA : fi:?:�;{.}}:•i Service Line Size r : ; ..::.,...,.. •' fi{ k, "': >'< 760� };:::::,:,:,;Y�/.. v:, ..38 <x :> :;r: Water Meter Charge Required 39 Hydrant Required ' ''<}'.'> ' 40 Hydrant Size Existing Fire Line Charge Required - Sprinkler •"} •" ' "•�: "'a :� ___ �._ ;,<42<.; Street Cut } wr s LS Miscellaneous J Reviewed By: PUB IC WORKS DEpl FIRE PLANNING E INEERING PUB IC WORKS E C 0 R D OF CONTACTS � 21 2 22 3 23 4 24 5 25 6 26 7 27 8 28 RW PERMIT # DATE ISSUED RECEIPT #_ 9 29 ^^ 10 30 11 31 12 32 13 PAID RECEIPT # DATE 33 SS PERMIT t DATE ISSUED ad '78 RECEIPT # /0'? ,(= 14 PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE 34 15 35 16 36 17 37 METER SIZ&q PAID $ (,Q DATE I 0 RECEIPT # 18 38 19 39 20 40 `1'"'. -sr CITY OF EDMONDS ea �8y0.�9 Address of Construction: Property Legal Description (Include all easements): _ Jp,Q� 101 ? Yli Owner and/or Contractor: State License No Single Family /❑` Multi -Family (No. of Units ) O Commercial ❑ Public a�,,.1:�...-R:...,=..��v::mr`ii�'�1.k�'Y�`li3i'l�r•ti,,pJ� R,�X�,�t So Sys SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT 6\ 2 3912 RL LYNNWOOD LINE Building Permit No. Invasion into City Right -of -Way:. No ❑ Yes RW Construction Permit No. Cross other Private Property:)d No ❑ Yes Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I certify that I have read and shall comply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. - �,o - 9S Date * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OFFICE USE ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 7rt-tM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. / 771-C�k3S' . Permit Fee: `'a 0 Issued By Trunk Charg 5• 00 Date Issued: 1 7 Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: /7 q&y Lid No.: �� 7 Partial Inspection: '% J Date Initial Comments Reason Rejected: Date . Initial i j Final Inspection Approved: Date Initial. ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector 'Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3190 t The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENTNO . ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION Ja' REPAIRS ❑ LID NO . .................. .ASMT. NO................... OWNER CONTRACTOR ....................... f.......................................... PERMIT NO. ..8.9/Z.... JOB ADDRESS 7/ 2 /1'�egL✓owe o�g % Bea G.�i.-./�c ..._ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO ....................................... BLOCK NO. .................................... n 10 ......................................•--.......-•--•--•-•--•----.....---•---•-............_.. _ _ _. _,. ILYNt"WOOD Ll E NAMEOF ADDITION ----------•-----------•--••-••---•-•••---....................�!; =---:::.---.....-•-•-------•-- Sc" M/!} J7%adlowedaIC- ,de- ac /7 fa Approved: 'rPWW.0001-11175 (REV.11/78) !- z q- 4 -• B DATE ........-•-•---....-•--••.�.........y l��tZC�e�zt�ee,.t.----•---•------------ .. City of Edmonds . RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION - PERMIT Peat Number. Issue Date:A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: ? I ® M S A �s U w A AL F_' ME AC K • � Cs 7n B. Type -of Work (be specific): 1 N 5''TA LL I AIC t�G o w �tSG!{� eons C. 189p C. Contractor:,, n Co. P. v, A , Contact: 13 /At<A k F V Mailing Address: Ito 14 Ilu.y 9 `f Phone: t'°�,�5", . Ga �Q '" -�� / 4- . State License /i: r n m o vtN S, UJ A %0 2 (_ Liability Insurance: Bond: -$ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit-# (if applicable): 77 E. ❑ Commercial. ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑.?tip fy (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family] Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes 1ANo G. Size of Cut: *11__ x A Charget$,.. 4 APPLICANT TO READ AND, SIGN ,. INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City r f Edr�tonds harmless from injuries; dbmages; or claims 'ofany ' kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by. reason of grant ng';his permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKNIANSHIP AND'LIATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- T/ON AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PA TCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ' Two sets of construction drawings of proposedwork required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City. Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requiremIents and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purposes. Signature: Date: /? _ 2 3 - '3 % L/ lt_untrueiurorAgent) CALL DIAL-A-DIC. PRIOR TO RFCTINNINC. WORK `- 44 NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997 r- r�-T ,ram N" ------ .�s N0146WSH COUNTY '6 UTILITY 4,10!-f-", -i SfkicT 7, 1476- 71*%:.J94 LOCATMH -7/,Z 0 /0 6 A t, O-W-DA L E V�' C)t.'l M b:s' U-) A 0-0;r-4 coo;,) Ty .-AREA POLE 4 VA 1/4 S 8 T Z7 R 4 DATE IZ -ZS ­97 W.O. REASON FOR WORK 0 a SIC c- _Z) ENGINEER KAKALty Fort - DWG. I z z 1 7 k A K4 DRAFTER U.G. # w A,-S)' SCALE ��.--.FOREMAN DATE PRINTED APPROV FEIESIREGURED: RYIES= -ENO PRIMRM,OIFERHEAD" U RESIDENTIAL UCOMMERCIAL LEO $ SEC0WART OVERHEAD BASIC'FEE METOWCOW.-POLE--s PRIMAIRY UNDERGROUND URESDENTIfiL UCOMMERCIAL BASIC FEE $ LEU # SECONDARf UNDERGROUND BASIC FEE $ SOD 1@$-/ = $ UNDERGROUND PLAT BASIC FEE $ eft $ STR>£T LIGHTING WORKlm RIGHT-OF-WAY U PRIWAFW USEDDNOART Oft 0 $ $ ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Cil EXEMPT 0 NOT EXEMPT PARA. 18 ITEM C. o 0 SUBSTATION KV -CIRCUIT NO:. PHASE _ ADD _CKT. FT. PH REM. CKT. FT. PH NET CKT. FT. O.H. U.G. COND. Wit ADD CKT. FT PH REM CKT. Fr. PH NET CKT. FT. PERMITS-- --(DATE GRANTED) • TREE TRIM — • STATE — • COUNTY — • CITY F-(> /V\ o N b3 Q__ EASEMENTS 0 REQUIRED U NOT REQUIRED DATE RELEASED FOREIGN CONTACTS • GTNW JPN #_ • CATV JPN # Z JOINT TRENCH GTNW & CAN C],JOINT BORE GTNW & CATV_ POLE STENCILING FROMTO fAISCELLAINEOUS FEES TAKE OFF POLE VAULT $ PRE-CONSTR. REQUIREMENTS PERMIT $ 3GU TREE TRIM U PUD LOCATOR _BAA �k CKHOE 1.8 FLAGGING $ 13 ONE CALL DATE T071AL DUE: $ INDEX _ LiPOLES I I PLAT nATEPAID LOGS U-MAP RECFrT#XFMR ,C'# flEWlVP%- . CA--'(.77/0 LOCATION MAP PAGE KAKALEY (4ZS) co70_32/4 (4ZS) 797- 7SZ 3 /i A/ 6ffl V I W RMV EX�STI NG SVC �iV►R.E: ,FRAM_ RlS_ER /aNp Re.- Rou r i'i ro G s t3oRE_.-20'ORF- (QY_ PACtF1C :CABL��<- -j RENCK ZIP StiJ �uP THE f3ANK� .SET SEc. PE�(p2> p.N L�V6L A2EA • /A/SrACL 293�PVC 350kcrn. AL -rRPLX r- 0/A XFMR tN`f-O NC W p_t_sT- PEA 4l0 A� -TRPLX FRonn 17t$T. PEA (Pr� TO tv�w PEC7,�rt'2� 2-44 7111 �A q'2-4 P s:, P-GG5G-X —a GCID-8 a COS. o is 'T N-14 A-467 Location: 27N4EO8B Scale 1:60 RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, 'WA 98020 COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION 911293M8 . 12/03/97 16:57 p.0005 Recorded Snohomish County AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference Grantor(s): (1) +�btr2�rn. k ry r� (2) Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): $ec_Twnng V fAtr -s y OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) � �fl 1D� (2) --Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS . APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY: DATER)itPAGE ,,OF Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State. Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: APPROVED FOR =,57- BY: �.4 DA PAGE 1. Description of Subject Property. This covenant of notification and indemnificatio"old harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of (insert street address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washingtonandlegally described as: 'l 91 'G 79 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has.been identified by the.City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The ,risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant .as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number G-70 8 R `.`� _ (insert number) on file with the City of _ Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or, prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of . APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: DATE:/0/19/g PAGE 3 OF S' the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file' as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Planning Department, City of Edmonds, ?ff 5th Avenue /zl North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such . development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: JUI DATE: PAGE OF arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. Insurance Requirement: In addition to. any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community •Services Director has/bps ' t (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage i.n the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land This covenant of notification and indemnificatioa/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject .tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, - heirs, successors and interests „or any other ...person ' `or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: DATE: ®Qi'L419-7 .. PAGE -5- OF DONE this day of -"-- ,1997. OWNER(S) By: By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY O�s��iLk ) _ N I certifythat I know, or have satisfactory evidence that, a N, �r Vaw ry 1 ► V lwn% �1 signed this instrument`and �e►iY acknowledged it to be (h srret-) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. G -.DATED this '� da "rQ a- 199> . N+ S�A'�E Ur WA `1�. " p;A��--• ga.�o-9� NOTARY PUBLIC C, N 155106 ` ' My commission expires: �At, ON CITY OF EDMONDS''' RECORD OF SHORT SUBDIVISION ®�S OFFj F£ This is to certify that the properties as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") and described as follows, See Exhibit "B" have been divided under the provisions of the Edmonds Subdivision Ordinance (Sec 20.75) File No. S-93-114 subject to the following conditions and requirements: 1. Exhibit C, Hold Harmless 2. No tree clearing is allowed on the site without a, tree clearing permit approved by the City of Edmonds. A tree clearing plan approved with a building permit will be allowed in lieu of a tree clearing permit. 3. No tree clearing shall be allowed for the, sake of future development without first obtaining an approved building permit with an approved clearing plan. 4. The property shall not be terraced for the sake of creating yard space. A proposed ref house should be designed to accommodate the steep slope and the natural forestation of the site. Decks will be allowed as part of the house design in lieu of the terracing of slopes. 5. Setbacks shown on the map are for reference only and vest no right. I / we verify that I / we are the legal owner(s) of the property described above. I / we warrant that all representations are true and correct and understand that in the event of any misrepresentation or failure to comply with the conditions and regulations set forth herein, the City of Edmonds shall have the right to declare that subdivisions void and record a statement to that effect in the Grantor -Grantee's Index in the office of the Snohomish County Auditor. Signed: STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrumenn , and acknowledged that signed the same as ._.e. t . c free and voluntary acf -and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS To: Applicant From: Jamal Mahmoud, Engineering Inspector Owner: �C_��'1 t * �Y✓Iy� Plan Check No:c? 2� Address: r 7 n tr ------- ---=�'.-.C�t-1 ----- Date:__ ? `i i After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met: I. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 A.M: 10:00 P.M.;WEEKENDS/HOLIDAYS -- 10:00 A.M: 6:00 P.M. 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 18.60) 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. 4. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site (ECDC 18.30.030d). 5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 18.30.50G) 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC 18.30) 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. (ECDC 18.30) 8. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap r, may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the perm (ECDC 18.90) 9. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to - keep the slope below 14%. Waiver grantec %. (ECDC 18.80.060D) 10. Driveways must be paved from property line to City RIGHT-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) 11. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18.3 12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department. 13. Connection to City water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter (ECDC 7.20). 14. A back water valve is required if downstairs plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20) 15. Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10) 16. Connec ion to the City sanitary system is required. A separate permit is required. LID# Fees paid: Yes No Charge S' (ECDC 18.10) 17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction; and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assesse• value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) 18. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANC OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC 18.90) PPW"P.WC CITY Copy City of Edmonds Building Dept. Oct. 2, 1997 A meeeting was held between the undersigned to review and discuss the final plans for site grading, building placement, and foundation detail of the proposed single family residence to be constructed at 7120 Meadowdale Beach Rd. The principle reason for this meeting is to verify that the submitted plans do reflect -the statements and concerns. -expressed in the Geotech's report submitted by Earth Analysis, and those of the P.E., H. Nick Lehtinen. i The garage slab elevation shall be ZSES / 7--o Geotech and/or Engineer inspection of work in pro �txJT//\.*-- GTXG.4VAIIaIVS /'PDUGI+ G/iAO'9 P'n o& Tu PovA Fp0T'/.vC,- g cress shall be n r v��,� /9 C C, C U PA 1 o -1. -r o Po Other comments v j[e-c / e v0Gr /,�4 /_ • crG s . 2) A o o / ZO /°J u— /OG /,F /GO i4 r f3e-cow 146as¢ d D2iL, //GONG , a .4- e"o M o v D S n Pa-G 3) 3//��rA.�v�- watt. Fo.�- Gv7- .6•y'�� ��0�'G' A I V e L—jr A '4 / kv i /v L-- N o L? t- /l cq� �. 9) COflV �85-707o w�17W mE19/v/n 5/Zr/j V)6#Aran%./ Cowjo.acrun.. S /4C''e P)y A Oy/A+►/a- 5/ L rJ o /C. P / G dr / iv smell tr-c r I B ry /9' -v- /2 0 4,4 - ws. G v 7- / �U �j�p br'C Ti ✓ n. 7� 7-0 I ry 5 Pr V-11 . . z / o ti 0 tr/6 7- %X --P l.S % b P T 1 rn L) '- - -7 L arc L7 _S T2 A-w (3 ,A- L t 'F I LTr_ ►2 w�rN s r/►'� 4-2.1 %� r� r(L 1 o ,%C, ^b Allen C. Fay / -Melanie Ervin / 'Owner Damian Ervin / Owner im !!�" Q7 e Ebbinga / OLfter / �e�r��✓ of�l�w o STRFET FILE f RMIT COW /1-*U7 PROM 1747/757/777 EP 425 342 9585 1957.05-04 11304 9480 P.01/03 ,s _ sEf� 4 y 1997 IF: ri AM A-L MA N n4oua GO K1 M G(N t r % 5� � V � G``�� � R'' P r', �" �,� "dr,� f": �► r,� CA I AJC. . ,-�L` F. , P. V I LU. Ga s f [ ►J C L= , 71 Zp 'PL, A tv c. C? rH ar GA�Ge� t.�4r�pNg �m2 T►'fE r9MsoQ yr of 6;4.41911 JG TD t11: Z)OMS OM 1r«4G s)'re• /T- J.5 *s5u.jyr-p 7►-Ae.47- .f4( xr.L�cti tat.��r->r�r..4z -31 L 0ma MA 4(z e, CQ(ZRr—A7TLV r`'1.AWNIAX TO u-VC. c o4►26l% L,41uo.Tc r OO."V41/zvcKer-IL•5 CON.sT. t tc.. %V. 0,0µreC•y, OP L. YAW woos, `7 D 1 A,1 �T c. 'r-r'I E G 4 6 I/F ►2 r A�. P �u 4 7`i+� Cr .� r"� �'�t- W r TH r pJ 'ri+ry rc r ry3c 7�r4 w+r or- ��ys Arvo AoL L s, r-4.r CS; fL A. 0 ) N ' Cp U.S a /Z tiK (�,16 '-7) r i1 r f h[ r it _„t,r -r'�f}�rsF G�•. I�h'/� I f1 -ru r~ i irr- -rn r n ar 77) LL '-w A - -t L WA Y . 41 S LL-e f J 15. /�* IAk—r,ZL 4*RR AvY /9i)ur'rjo j +e_ cQNEtT'.atUs n n 101 I I I I I, -1 1 IN _ APPROVED AS NOTED G.aoxzk FROM ;747/787/777 EP 425 342 5665 1557,09-04 11.08 #480 P.02/03 A-) OL aw it.. Lid ol/ac 1) 8 x 2Yz X.5,- /0 J 1Z,Z! Jln'� lot Dz 'A L L 1,01 cv ry a aN f f r �1 t� s�SYI� T7kfT <n0C7fi';3k 0Z11- ;0 D rV � CG, s-a-C-� 01 A V 5 ,,. LD�� %✓�} l �� �,,�`�� ,AUG 131997 City of Edmonds its \Sai C6110 jcf 7 Building Department 0� �Q�N4 Attn: Jim Walker �04 0 Dear Sir, We are submitting plans that detail the construction of a small single family residence on a lot in north Edmonds. The lot was created a few years ago by splitting a larger lot into 2 parcels. During the short platting proceedure and the Preliminary Review of Proposed Short Subdivision (see attached), the statements and conclusions made by city staff, stressed the need to preserve as many trees and other vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize the overall grading effort. We concur with those statements and conclusions. In support of the city's position, we are requesting relief on the driveway's incline to a maximum of 20% grade. This increase will allow the house to be relocated and shorten the driveway by approx. 20'. The benefit to the city is the preservation of additional trees and vegetation area, an -25% reduction in site disturbance for that driveway, and a reduction in impervious surface area. The benefit for the owners / developers are; a shorter backing distance from the house to the remote situated turn -around, and possibly some reduction in driveway construction cost. Thank You for your consideration of this request. Owners; Melanie & Damian Ervin 706-212th PL. SW. Lynnwood, Wa. 98036 Melanie Ervi _.. - F1 - T-I Damian Ervin r Cyr a.. r �• M ,0C r-q C) Q } COP off CITY OF EDMONDS+� RECORD OF SHORT SUBDIVISION . OFFj�f This is to certify that the properties as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") and described as follows, See Exhibit "B" have been divided under. the provisions of the Edmonds Subdivision .Ordinance,(Sec - - 20.75) File No. S-93-114 subject to the following conditions and requirements: Exhibit C, Hold Harmless No tree clearing is allowed on the site without a tree clearing permit approved by the City of Edmonds. A tree clearing plan approved with a building permit will be allowed in lieu of a tree clearing permit. No tree clearing shall be allowed for the sake of future development without first obtaining an approved building permit with an approved clearing plan. The property shall not be terraced for the sake of creating yard space. A proposed house should be designed to accommodate the steep slope and the natural forestation of the site. Decks will be allowed as part of the house design in lieu of the terracing of slopes. 5-- Setbacks shown on the map are for reference only and vest no right. I / we verify that I / we are the legal owner(s) of the property described above. I / we warrant that all representations are true and correct and understand that in the event of any misrepresentation or failure to comply with the conditions and regulations set forth herein, the City of Edmonds shall have the right to declare that subdivisions void and record a statement to that effect in the Grantor -Grantee's Index in the office of the Snohomish County Auditor. ... ....... Signed: ,':% iIj ' STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me to. me known -to be the individuals described in and who exeCLited—the within and foregoing instrumenj, and acknowledged that r �. signed the same as ,� (': t . free and voluntary acE=and deed, for the uses and nnmmec therein mentinned 4. Flag lot determination: No flag lots will be created by this proposal. 5. Consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance? Yes 6. Zonin : The subject property is zoned RS-20 (single residential with a minimum 20,000 square foot lot size requirement). F. CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1. Conforms to the policies of the Comprehensive Plan? Yes G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1. Is this site identified on the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map? No. 2. Is an Environmental Checklist Required for this application? No. H. `:CRITICAI:"AREAS;REVIEW. y'1. Critical Areas Review number: CA-93-37 2. Results of Critical Areas Review: A Conditional Waiver was granted. The conditions of the waiver can be found in Attachment 5. Other conditions relating to the Critical Areas: The subject property slopes down to Meadowdale Beach Road at a slope between 40% and 60%. The intent of the Critical Areas Ordinance is to preserve these steep slopes in as natural a state as possible. Therefore the applicant will be required to identify a proposed driveway location. In addition, all future development shall be done in a manner to preserve the maximum number of trees on site. The property shall not be terraced or filled for the sake of creating a yard. I. REQUIRED .IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATIONS Engineering, drainage and street dedications: See City Engineer's Report (see Attachment 4). 2. Parks or other facilities? None . II. PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed 2-lot short subdivision subject to the following conditions: Engineering Division conditions listed on Attachment 4 2. No tree clearing shall be allowed without a tree clearing permit, unless the trees present a hazard to the health, safety and welfare of the public. 3. No clearing shall be done for the sake of future development. 4. The property shall not be terraced for the sake of creating yard space. A proposed house should be designed to accommodate the steep slope and the natural forestaion of the site. Decks will be allowed as part of the house design in lieu of the terracing of the slope. BY: John Bissell ' DATE: 08/02/93 smiie.DW 2of 3 PLANNING DATA NAME:N14t)1G D�^+��✓r✓' `�`�'' SITE ADDRESS: DATE: g/2 ZONING: 95-,26 PLAN CHK#: r 7- Z � O PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ne✓ S,/V . &S- CORNER LOT,,,. �I e� (Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front:�Left Side: I Right Side: lU Rear: .Actual Setbacks:, --- Front: 2,6 Left Side: 11 % Right Side: 975 Rear: Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED — (Y/N) LOT COVERAGE: Maximum Allowed: �5 �� Actual: *3 i, BUILDING HEIGHT: , . /i Maximum Allowed: %f Actual Height: �� to Datum Point: AwettslcotkL, Datum Elevation: A.D.U. CREATED?: No SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS #: 9 3 - 3 -7 Con ql . as xz SEPA DETERMINATION: �C)<rK LOT AREA: Zt, � ZU F r-P OTHER: Plan Review By: w lC,0Of-ca, Cr 7 cAfileApermi ffplandai.doc I (1 csr -7/7 To PoG,KATH11 D,97-A 33/_ \ a2�ti�wUd ar: R�s I I SO�ARCE � KE GiEL q .A 55oC. 1 �D �b'CIR.�G{ i S 1 E1= Eoanv AAJALI-S 97.44° 3� i ,9' G4A p,,J6, DATA --- 1 •P2oVIDFO 5(: 3cf % / 31' \•V. e�' 1 3� aGvdt mN /3i� 3/- i I 3 i ° _L / Z qO 7, 8' 1 —0 /fEi4NT 'D 32.5 300 4 24.9 295 I 10 20 SF 2/3 RCRE) _ C3% bF Lo-rl / g 9 f. S F - � �J99XinruAsl ,$c•Dy q�%' '� I -'�/ � l 2'yo 0 2�= SANG 26� I \ � 1 $ L 1; ';'i .—" `/ •�nnlN l3SlSL 1 - � __ _ _;�.i .. ,��1'_�' OTMF2 .0 Ti l.l'r1EC �•4� TGriTL/NE `" RmoR-VAAIOS / I 1 17FXC- 1 Tu21J- �ETAiIJ IN ttTEU T.O r=J ` �p WGti P'� i 1 /iQnu..D Sys re•r - :..ryyY.f,al .. `��, �1' .,r- - NS1DRAor tgo —I L 0 SCiiLE a 1 FRV W RF-S I DF-IJ GE H>;,GNT CALLS 7I X.Z MF At)OWT)AL•F BEAcn 1 ; MAIL 8oK �_.Cslrr1NEDmoMt>s, WA. 9go26 AP. }, (� ( _t� ri FILE AUG 18 1997 - PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS To: Applicant From: Jamal Mahmoud, Engineering Inspector Owner: Address: Plan Check No: % Date:_ After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must-be-met:' ustbemet: 1. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 A.M: 10:00 P-M-;WEEKENDS/HOLIDAYS -- 10:00 A.M: 6:00 P.M. 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is required for all work on public property, (ECDC 18.60) 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. 4. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site (ECDC 18.30.030d). 5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 18.30.50G) 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC 18.30) 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. (ECDC 18.30) 8. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap r, may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the perm (ECDC 18.90) 9. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14%. Waiver grantec (ECDC 18.80.060D) 10. Driveways must be paved from property line to City RIGHT-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) 11. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18.3 12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department. 13. Connection to City water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter (ECDC 7.20). 14. A back water valve is required if downstairs plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20) 15. Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum, (ECDC 18.10) 16. Connec ion to the City sanitary system is required. A separate permit is required. LID# Fees paid: Yes No Charge S'S (ECDC 18.10) 17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assesse• value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) 18. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANC OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC 18.90) PP WAPP.DOC \ 5W 1/4. 5eC. 9. TW - 27. R. 4 E.. W.K \ \ MH .250 ` \ EP DITCH 64 12' CMP - \ \ R=20.00'\ \ .yh 50 25 0 50 T-6;N&5' 9. SCALE: 1'=50' H \ \ \\ 5HORT PLAT. FOR MIKt. CHAMBER5 DATE: 24 MAY, 1993. \ \ \ \ \ \ row \ H \\\\ \��\\\. \ 0 EDB G \ \ N \ \ C7- Z0, 6�T �5` > DITCH OF OF BANK 0/w,zso O ov HOUSE d 5i I I� I III N 'n FND. I I I I I I I N o THOMA5 M. FICL60HM \ 0/w 5HE0 q� to 42 25' Q /I I o TOTAL 51TE ACREAC,E: 1.12 AC. (40,665 5F.) Ex15T. ZONwC: R520 \ �, 0 0 JFH a Fro iP \ �s _ . i 69a-199.. City of Edmonds Critical Areas Checklist The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out. the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development Permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map Of the parcel with enough detail that City staffcan find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant is encouraged to include any other pertinent information or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: Name Title ?/2,7 —7 . Street Address City, State, ZIP Phone ignature Dat Applicant Representative: Name Title Street Address City, State, ZIP Signature Phone Date RECEIVED }Site Information Project Name: Critical Areas Checklist' Permit Number. FE B 1 0 1993 PERMIT COUNTER Site Location: 7��"! UD . Property Tax Account Number. �� fig- 00e r-9) %- coo Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 417 C l Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before? General Site Conditions 1. Has the site been cleared or logged? �/ �> Date of most recent action: Soils / Topography' ,l%/c%�hscoc 7% sandy iaWaus ,� % Peg`C IV14 P" 5 2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil types)?,4 /cfe 6, /-L� �w#,.r r o Is9e s, 3. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling. slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a horizontal distance of 66 feet.) Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30°/p ( a vertical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.) p -�S es oresent on site. -- t�P= �df greater than 30%o p Comments Hydrology/Vegetation� 4. Site contains areas of year=i ound standing water: e' s 5: Site contains areas of seasonal standing water. Approx. Depth: D 6. Site is in the floodway.-floodplain ( V a of a water course. 7. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Yes flows are year -round? -,:—Flows are seasonal? 8. Site is primarily: forested meadow ; shrubs _;mixed 9. Obvious wetland is resent on site: d "rrJ0—=) 1I x.� P _o CON©1'IONALYVAi\/i=R'nLca] areas sivdy not required �f specerl sondittons satisfied u : WAIVER: Ccidcal areasstudy is not required J� Determination+Number. "? Reviewe Planner Hate Rev 3/27ro2 City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: [Chambers, Michael Determination #: CA-93-37 Project Name: Permit Number: Site Location:. 17129 72nd Ave. W Property Tax Acct #: 5598-000-007-00 Project Description: A 2 lot Subdivision. Waiver Criteria (all criteria must be found to apply): XX There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers; XX The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; XX The development proposal meets the minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; XX .- The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: 1: The applicant must comply with any requirements the Building Official might call for because of construction on steep slopes (ECDC title 19.05, 19.00-UBC chapter 70). 2. The applicant must follow the requirements of the Engineering Division for erosion control (ECDC title 18). 3. The applicant must follow the direction of the Planning Department in the subdivision of this property. Based on the above findings and conditions, the requirement for a Critical Areas Study associated with this development permit is hereby Waived, as authorized by Chapter 20.15B.150 (B) of the Edmonds Commun' Develo t Code. Stephen F. Bullock Jill '5 /C6 Name Sig&ture ate CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PROPOSED SHORT SUBDIVISION I. APPLICATION: A. File No. S-93-114 B. Site Address: 17129 72nd Avenue West C. APPLICANT: Michael Chambers D. ANALYSIS OF DESIGN: 1. Lot sizes and dimensions: a) Existing number of lots: 1, with a total lot area of approximately 48,665 square feet. b) Proposed number of lots: 2. c) Lot sizes: (1) Lot 1 Net Area: 28,620 Gross Area: 28,620 (2) Lot 2: Net Area: 20,045 Gross Area: 20,045 d) Areas and setbacks: Lot areas and setback delineation's are adequate for the RS-20 zone. Lot 1 Street Setbacks: From the Northeast line (Meadowdale Beach Road right- of-way edge). and from the West line (the edge of the unopened right-of- way of 72nd Avenue West. Side Setbacks: 10 feet from the south line. Rear Setback: N/A Lot Z Street Setback: From the West line (the edge of the right-of-way of 72nd Avenue West. Side Setbacks: From the Southwest and north lines. Rear Setback: N/A e) Corner Lots: As proposed, lot 1 would be defined as a corner lot. Lot 2 is not a corner lot, but lot two has just three sides. As the lot lines are proposed, no lot line would be a rear lot line. 2. Lot arrangement to topography: Satisfactory; each lot is steeply sloped, but the arrangement of the lot lines, will allow for a low sloping driveway to enter lot one. Lot two is already developed with an existing access. 3. Lot Coverage of Existing Buildings on Proposed Lots: Lot 1: No existing structures on Lot 1. Lot 2: 15.5% lot coverage S93114.DOC I of 3 4. Flag lot determination: No flag lots will be created by this proposal. 5. Consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance? Yes 6. Zoning: The subject property is zoned RS-20 (single residential with a minimum 20,000 square foot lot size requirement). F. CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1. Conforms to the policies of the Comprehensive Plan? Yes G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1. Is this site identified on the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map? No. 2. Is an Environmental Checklist Required for this application? No. H. CRITICAL AREAS REVIEW: 1. Critical Areas Review number: CA-93-37 2. Results of Critical Areas Review: A Conditional Waiver was granted. The conditions of the waiver can be found in Attachment 5. 3. Other conditions relating to the Critical Areas: The subject property slopes down to Meadowdale Beach Road at a slope between 40% and 60%. The intent of the Critical Areas Ordinance is to preserve these steep slopes in as natural a state as possible. Therefore the applicant will be required to identify a proposed driveway location. In addition, all future development shall be done in a manner to preserve the maximum number of trees on site. The property shall not be terraced or filled for the sake of creating a yard. I. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATIONS 1. Engineering, drainage and street dedications: See City Engineer's Report (see Attachment 4). 2. Parks or other facilities? None . II. PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed 2-lot short subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1. Engineering Division conditions listed on Attachment 4 2. No tree clearing shall be allowed without a tree clearing permit, unless the trees present a hazard to the health, safety and welfare of the public. 3. No clearing shall be done for the sake of future development. 4. The property shall not be terraced for the sake of creating yard space. A proposed house should be designed to accommodate the steep slope and the natural forestaion of the site. Decks will be allowed as part of the house design in lieu of the terracing of the slope. BY: John Bissell DATE: 08/02/93 S93114DOC 2 of 3 PERMIT Post Office Box 6966 Bellevue, WA 98008-0966 Telephone (206)391-8255 STREET FILE' Facsimile (206)391-8270 Michael T. Chambers. 17129 - 72nd West Edmonds, WA 98026 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Assessment northern half of Chamber's Property 17129 - 72nd West Edmonds, Washington Reference: 1) Soils and Foundations Proposed Residential Construction Lot 12, Eagle's Crest, Phase I Report by Neil H. Twelker & Associates, Inc. dated February 8, 1990. 2) 8 1/2 x 11 inch copy of a portion of the local plat map. unsigned/undated 3) 8 1/2 x 11 inch copy of a topographic map of the area with five-foot contours from the City of Edmonds files, unsigned/undated. Dear Mr. Chambers: Job Number 3015 March 21, 1993 This letter presents our Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Assessment for the northern half of your property at 17129 72nd West in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of our services was to generally evaluate the suitability of the site for the construction of a typical single-family residence. The scope of our services included the review of the referenced material and a site visit where we reconnoitered your property and observed the excavation for Lot 12 of Eagle's Crest, Phase L It is our opinion that this level of effort is appropriate to generally evaluate the site from a geotechnical engineering perspective. At the time that specific construction plans are developed, then we recommend a full geotechn ical engineering study of the site be conducted. The site is on a northeast -facing moderate slope' which does not appear to have been developed with buildings in the past. The property is covered with a moderate growth of trees and shrubs. We didn't notice evidence of springs exiting on the slope, although the drainage ditch along the southwest side of Meadowdale Beach Road did have water in it. We did not notice surficial evidence of inherent, deep-seated instability along the slope, although shallow soil sluffing is a possibility. It is our opinion that the slope on the site is generally stable. We do expect that the top three to seven feet of soil cover along this slope may require some reinforcement. during excavation depending on the depth of excavation and the time of year during construction (i.e., ecology block walls, rockeries, and/or shoring). Under the topsoil and surficial looser soils, we anticipate excavations will encounter a dense to very dense gravelly silty sandy glacial till. This preliminary conclusion is based on Reference,1 and our observations of the excavation for Lot 12 of Eagle's Crest, Phase L These lower till soils will be able to provide adequate bearing to typical single-family structures. J0171Vu/�cucl PRELIM INARY ASSESSMENT - CHAMBERS LOT page .2 March.21, 1993 . perspective, that the rofessional opinion from a geotechnical engineering pe p In conclusion, it is our p�, For example,.final design may 'table for development with a single-family residence, although the final design lot is generally suitable typical construction. will have to .accommodate site specific subsu n i e oily encountered in P properly deli require more steel in the basemen�l wallsunstable, does not appear inherently ble, and ce the stability even further. The y designed The it is our OF site single-family residence on the property would enhan the undersigned directly at (206) 391-8255 if there are any questions. Please contact rely: Since DODDS Geosciences Inc• V'K. Dp0 WASy'�° O e� 41 22508 ° ty. EXPIRES Mark K. Dodds, P.E. MKD/wd p� O 1103 ` RFcI n�� 6 / 20 / 93 :01 N A, CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONER!5 —O(j NUMBER 17OS699 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB §U.!TF,.APT # ME OF BUSINESS OWNER NAME NAME ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. 9171-1 Y LID NO 164 Fv MAILING -ADDRESS Z 0—il% PUBLIC RI WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET NW. TESCP Approved 0 RW Permit Required 11 'Y-k ZIP NUMBER CITY I TELEPHONE EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd 0 Inspection Required NAME PROPOSE Siqejalk Required cet� rr I o" Y f C, Or METE E SIj5 LINE Ti �E NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED W F_ < ADDRESS J YES NO L4 4 I-, PI LAL) REMARKS CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER W W 5 V61" Z NAME 1e e (y, ,_r 1" 4- i�-fy­-L C-:,k C­% Aof 0 61 So cc 2 ADDRESS Pc;• a-,)[ 4 ­ ENGINKAPA40 nATED R BY jr CITY ZIP ITELEPHONE NUMBER ' Z 0 5> FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY cr STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE OynA 9- Ji T-C- 3: 6?:ZXM 7 SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ADB NO, ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE Legal Description of Property - include all easements Z _Sl�j 7 14 JEXEMPT Is- SHORELINE # 0 EXP 0. VARIANCE OR cu PLANNING REVIEW BY ATE 7A, I Lu 0 0 (4 SETBACKS — FEEj I 771pi Z'�/'SIDE HEIGHT LOT OVERAGE Z Z LU _j Tax Account REAR REMARKS Parcel No. r_K21 LA_j NEW LjOi RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING E] st b&l ro ve�vwlr# ADDITION COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL APT. BLDG. El SIGN REMODEL GRADING ❑ FENCE CHM W TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE OCCUP PI GROUP REPAIR CYDS. x _FT). WOODSTOVE ❑ SWIM POOL DEMOLISH INSERT HOT TUB/SPA REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPER I AMA 2 Oet X. OCCUPANT- LOAD YES Ll 2 a, 6 FUn GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT ROCKERY El RENEWAL 1p REMARKS 0 Z (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: 4.." PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER. UBC 305 'CLC b? Sil-l',-Alit f WY-11N. f�-.-Af Q 1�7/1 1 Aiaaf T v A *246 U 00 0 W cl NUMBER - NUMB OF -OF DWELLING 4%_ I C RITICArlp-'o AREAS NUMBER CA - 93 - W 0 STORIES UNITS PLOT PLAN) :5*utrrt44j4j_ 61/ H. 44 LIFFOL17-10111e.,Ij DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH (^OAYf rA 1A t r FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE ty BUILDING '33.3 03 8,52- HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING PLUMBING Plan Check No. MECHANICAL (09 4-)COD This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL 34 Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, 4,50' driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days . STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE ., . 1 -30 successors in interest, agrees to indemnity, defend and hold T harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, i employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of cr whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT aim Io permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to of this per modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance 0 T nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE' provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor AUTHORIZES ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is ion Insuraase-sold RCW 18.27, INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. IGNATURr(OWNER ,PR A,rFNTf DATE SIGNED 61-1— DEPARTMENT CITY OF OFF SWIGTURE DATE t EDMONDS 7- CALL FOR `R E I. & A� 7 a Y7: DATE N ATTENTION INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE I. ill I - UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771-0220 ORIGINAL L (�Ile YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY,, HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor 102-87 - ;•; � x . � -. ;.�R.i.� � 4 s, ray; ' ., ]Ea3,wt4a4 if 40 S .... ED A C / , r.f t Y .300 ate. 90 4Ilez--' °}7`j�T'J .1 R7f• f _ � /.�,� Q - - '•� J►7 F��.J 7 - - t c . y. i^'". A'�j, 1!.. J ,j, 1 - i _'�••�ir� F+ a. .. � � .. -S- - t� , • �. a_ t-f.,', 'it 4_,` 0 IE =N • � 'vK ON yf t •i - q' V _ < f<:::: a Y- • J e tIN ir n yam' re - 4 .A x:. �Ys •s f t rt + r • t V �f A j^ , 1 x• r •d 4. L. Lt �• R d e.. l .sr r' •.7 5 r*F r•i• • y !<f �i r'! R .r. fl y. f • t' - f • ,.. ...,_,...+.,ve !exIL t�a t vevi 1"') 4w aj- Rm AUG ,�t,i ,44- G I(A A W C-t BA-S L D VA) .e' Tb Pa ,5i A4P 14 V Dhrh Fi2Q f DE d. Pay F_Ak-rH 4AI41- J(SI, c srr o4rr lcrtr,p Repon-T) Ak cKr � Pli.[. -51,00a.E s jar- r"^dvt-ASD tW ITrj '04Z/47�R r4-AR'jr- ("GE -a -r-x.ri4r-) ���E�►y `�EC�A��- •� ,' Uo Cry i4obts E 5 #Ti: fR&GiZA0E- 1v �Q® cy -r b-'--,q t— 3 9 5—ay "504 -6+9V KN0R7t4 AUG 1. 81997 Poop .DRAtAJ5-'/{at,L 6.9 CVw4)Ec-rS0 LAA 4 ' TQ 71l r p UPPEIL C4-rC.N OASl�3 • isY`fF��- MAID i �jN A jam, �Si2\s Ac ou4 "-?av?tik7,"y LiNs 3si-ouJ Ga.RD1oG ig C.a��sit2uc'�rQ.J met)/SfljrD Q� Gc A� tfr4+tf- 2 'k p IV LSu1CsT* OF DIZJ7E`c.1ky s '�?-zt�t�<�i�6��}13 � 3C®', 1vvc- '� SrAeZ f"CA s;�+y WOig-V ,., � QL44 W jJ OAJ t TON AaDC;jt-S .q Vj0 Ar � tcl1€s'g'}� � r.�' � s t . im i*r.Io.ilimots «.-r a �z tro �'�: ° �� ft 3 #4Z R o A) rs F F D i R.C-c-r r � � f,�-© V NG Ttl r- Z�V Ir AJ'r" 10 JV S s 71j 4i . i Boat= A��� �ff�or{s �o�,T�c.� .,. � �SS,ar � WLo uJ ALL F/LS.Fb 5Lof>r-5. urrrmrk.S tiro ;i. -7-47 I- ��� 'ter 2 tO� `tO sT�F - OF Cxt2/�DI NG, %� `-+T�24•eCTKNC�s• ,►�stPl�„�J�c+a+�S ^gR:E'�.� � o-r1A.)4 2>4.4/ jU$ S tJ At LL 00-r 13r,GWAJCC-r6U "7'�1E �j ' s ffDt3ejo0u-i S r-BK. 'r?rssPIMPPeV. ^' .�. "¢ Je ' �F, o crams s s e 't"eOft) i>t%tv-G7'>~O e(2 r PE d i 2©' VF ,;F+01 7:114PFrrt KA/� QQ� f/ J�..•,/� 'l ro-rlop tat? atop ROW r �.� ......� t o o% r � 1� 7A. I� ice'Lit. I �yQ., � _ . a +�! • wyl_ vAo { - suAaLTr V x�...( S../I V - 9�3 4 2 �r 0 Intl ` rxo WJD � , tie.} A . S C�.gNTA 0sc'or piUG� I1 .- 1MUC.�ti4 C-m�G1t. t isent r. S) �`" • '� � i..�o uo S / .sue '�2U st ou e�nNr2o�. A?I{ ALT p �• x Fat,T�R is1l1C w �. ,�.�o sl.oil_E i }r - t' -. ',f ,I _. ... - .- _ r• 4:Y.:f�.-'t � •r- --•°: '•� S^ r,.. �-i'- !La 0� gl¢Gr�VEL O !„ � ENS .� - • - P FAOA4r- `' `• r .. . ' GRA�FL %Ifi�K/AfQ SC.DPS W0 Nuw4 la t!Ll.: SI.OWR-� !6oa�A fZ"Y 1Z2,.A_g2t� rt : O P [.. / .F TS Al S 4 rL 1- 6 %ks G -5 / Tk-j a TO S rRK•T SC.O Ptc �Nb L, 11=T$ i..IF TS OF3',Otcl2..A rN,t-Q.L • - .,. N q 11p 02 2 A--r 14cc c-S's MAL- i ST�t�r 11lPAGTE ty ��ML C„6Q' ?EGH N a - +... b' / f 1•.f 9tCS G �%C.D !M �►t E wl 0 %4T' o'o s , S Tr 6 TTh� H 64 1 rz '7T*XT1 01 �..M r� � • . SPo Ica - „�r 00 0rL le0'A01 �Ot"€ G2oc835D d� G STTAT 0#-� 4"b •; x -k � 5 N2 Rh•'c.� �(�GA N �C WA- i 'T`'� cZ S1.1,41..L ..�. '9� }Ztt`wtov'SO Fti0 %A `T-H-E GO-..40 Wr4 �,.: S •sYr B. 1-dn j,'. ... is ,..: ,i -.t - J•i-`q. 1 ' 7'•'�Lip '�C •"t S • ,r; '$ �y, .:{ �, .?Yf.r:wv �,� . w - [s • .. ''s /�,�j�hf' F {31..��� - �p1 ',`�- t'}.x' �••rr• -•�. yfi _b ,=z Kr,-' wry - •- - f ✓ • a .a .. - 7 r la.;. +{" ..�. _e�'#'c. � •.-�r'1 • � ^r e } 1 J .r1 y � r , SFA, F< vie✓ 712-0 /Ylmclo�l l�-6A 97-2(oc) cct PERMIT CQUN Kl STREET FILE °" PW (0 a 9 <-) SW 1/40 SAC. 8 v TWP. 27v R° 4 E , Wil. \ MH ,230 �I I- Ul u .V) U4 ,N. \ \ . \ eP \ \ \ \ DITCH CMP \ Rm0.010\ \ dl \ '*=62.A5' \ Dcq4*4R ° \ H \ 30 \ 25\ \ \ \ \\ F- Raw 55\5L \ \ \ \:• \� \ ` o i o. \,X UA% 259 \ 25 8581` \ 0, 45 SF\ DIW I \ \ \ ao 2s SCALED 10=50' so 5HORT PLAT FOR MIKE CHAMBER5 DAi[: 25 MAY, 199,3. NIS ti FH GA d FID. IP PP BP 0 nj House � ll 1 11 1 Na ND ►p �0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �` � 7 ► or w fro THOMAS M. FICKBOH s D p M qDo 1 1 1 w TOTAL SITB ACRBA _ Ge.. _1.12 _AC. (46,665 5F.) �9 555BL-BUILDING 58TBACK UNd 5TU8tx APPROX. 58WBR STUB LOCATION WILLIAM AND JACQUeLIN JOHNSON KEGEL & ASSOCIATES INC. CoNS ONG 04G1NwS � SURMVRS PLM NEn 9800 EVERQREEN WAY , kVERETT• WASkINOTON 98204 PH.(206) 353.. 1119 4R 778-5424 VAS „nq �p g,• E M 0 0 ro K ►v w w. m H m' SITE PLAN SHOWING . -P- ag-e - E- ightSCALE;30 CROSS SECTIONS- 'TESTHOLE-LOCATIONS. rSET •HUB, EL. 336 ti � CMP N T ` �62 '85' SECTION C-D: . _ •--� r, , a Di44• .41 4 _ • �• \ t' - EST HOLE YP `y 3 o E; 300' 9� w 0 -. • -- _ ... —._ . _ {' MARKER T T ,.. ;.p �:. = � SLOPE.. BREAK. --- - -- _ - - ;- :- 3 0 Ln w � • �°4 . � �`�,.� �" CROSS SECTION LINE. E N • :TERRACE �_ 4 ,D�, bjW 0 .�: FINISHED G. 4RA TRAILSTRATIFIED VELLY iv SAND OUTWASH .: z �. FF ELEV.. r � 8\!,z �2 il. to 250 _ I i �SR.S .r \ = \� FOOTING In O . Mg . 8' \ N '•,-' PERIM"ITER r O i 23O' ;-� WATER TABLE .. ' • ;; moo'.. \Oc 230' ;: 6 0� A B. \ - -� ti 1` •6� \�� .� ellSECTION A-B: •: t� TEST HOLE, TYP: T i 5. �' i y , z 1 - gy FOUND YELLOW MARKER, TYP`'.. 4. I -SPOT ELEVATION; TYP. 11 -__ �� 9 ' .b J1f• �jC��j% 7� <<j w 1 1 FINISHED GRAD �MARKER, TYP. a . �\ \ _\\ - \ 2 FF ELEV: \ PROPOSED D VEWAY . STRATIFIED - _ GRAVELLY 3k, \ SAND OUTWASH" If 3 s250a ' FIR, TYP- �' • �� \ 25at. 4-� r TEST •HOLE TYP . x ft • _ t t•� i : y.. ••� - . CUT BANK, TYP : �/ � i`' • `s ��� s �� . � j:, WATER i' TABLE . -j �30- ;210V 2 w CEDAR, TYP / 01, oo do \ LOT 1 as u r i OLD ROAD G `!) ` : 1 } GRADE, TYP: \ E• 1 - N• o(i 1 „ � (PTN. :SW4 STR: 082704 W:M.) 84 y l 19 W• 215.92'_ APPROX 7100 MEADOWDALE BEACHIkOAD, EDMONDS., WA. t p� FOUND STARE. .�CFD. MON, TYP. - GEOTECHNICAL" REPORT ' ` EARTH ANALYSIS os i roe: - TED CLIENT: EBBINGA i± 10622 64th PL. W. > CIVIUGEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING ADDRESS: Q�iV PERCOLATION TESTS. DRAINFIELD DESIGNS r I MUKILTEO 1 3033NE140thSL.Seattle. wa.satesStnTti Ios 'SCALE: 1IN_3CFT 98275 nerc: . I