Loading...
716 DALEY ST.PDF11111111111111 10756 716 DALEY ST I:1717;7x.Y.�l TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 011)gZ2w-ZM IN400 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS(RECORDED)FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: b 1 r DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: VWaiver DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: qZZ SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: I bq D a SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMITS) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED:�-� STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: L:\TEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc • • PLANNING DATA NAME: it a wool t40 W-L I DATE: SITE ADDRESS: PLAN CHK#: OK-K!l PROJECT DESCRIPTION: f Alf PI? REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?: 6s / No J MAP PAGE: 03 CORNER LOT: e / No FLAG LOT: es No ZONING: 11 �— 6 CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #: ❑ Studv Reauired: Waiver ❑ Conditional Waiver SEPA DETERMINATION: ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO list w/ notarized form ❑ (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) Exempt SETBACKS: /dam^ q'l e v�j � C vC ) I S Id ^ � �� Required Setba s: l `S Street: Left Side S Right Side: .� Rear. Actual Setbacks: Street: d, G Left Side: i Right Side: S Rear. 01 s Street map checked for additional setback required? Yes / No / DNA ❑, DETACHED STRUCTURES: \ ❑ ROCKERIES: �Q/`� /��O filed ❑ FENCES/TRELLISES: / ell Q. BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION: ❑ STAIRS / DECKS: - PARKING: Re uired: dam -Actual: LOT AREA: I��G 0 0 LOT .COVE �3Q�/�(��� , '?5 1 Calculations: V BUILDING HEIGHT: �. Datum Point: mr--,- (� ��a' C V r(-"- Datum Elevation: l `Gj , 7 Maximum Allowed: S Actual Height: o R �/ A.D.U. CREATED?: No / Yes SUBDIVISION: N k LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: es / o OTHER: A (� — see dt� SeTuck NewBPPlanningDataForm.DOC AUG-06-2004 15'24 #PZO P.03iO3 is Critical Areas Checklist CAF"eNO: Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) . 1. Site Address/vocation: L+ (71 L b 2. Property Tax Account Number: 4 2 ft 4 00011 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. . Is this site currently developed? _ yes; X no. -.�. If yes; how is site developed? S. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entird site. Rolling: . slo pes on site generally leas than 1596 a vl�ct of 10-feet S Y ( over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). x Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% prasont on site (a vertical rise of 104eet over a horizontal distance of Mess than Weet). Other (please desari'be): •—RECEIVED 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ba : Approx. SE P 0 31004 7. Site contains are of seasonal standing water. ; Approx. Depth: BUILDING DEPARTMENT What season(s) of the year? U17 OF EDMONDS 8. Site is in the floodway obi floodplain _ of a water course. . 9. Sit contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are yen -round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested • meadow �ed urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: AQ„� , For city staff use ONy I. Plan Check Number, if applicable? 2. Site is zoned? - t,5, 3. SCS mapped soil iype(s)? to dtdrwvM - lArb to St. 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. mp indicates Critical Area on alie? _. No ,• l y p„ r! S. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? No DMMRMINATION b'MY REQUIRED WAIVER GfiMaai Ann ArooMrA.25.2004 TOTAL P.03 W AUG-06-2004 15:23 P.02/03 I eb�, City lbEdmonds Date Receive—t2, Development Services Department City Receipt .� Planning Division Critical Areas Sle *:,.,_ Phone: 425.771.0220 Critical Areas Checklist Fe roe, t age Fax: 425.771.0221 Date MzUW to Aovlicant: The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to hisr'her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to- enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Amu. are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to eoaiplete the Checklist should be easily' available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas mventories, maps, or soil sw'vcYs)• . A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity amp, along with the signed copy of this faun to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. in addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography mzp, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their prelindnary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and hiAcr/its heirs. and assigns, in consideration an the prooeeft of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damage$, Including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information Annished by the applicand, bisilwhts agents or employees. By my signature, I cent* that the info=tion and exIdbits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized this 'cation on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATME OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE 41 Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above ApplicarWAgent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public ofl3oials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. S7GNATURB OF OWNBR _Jd� C`� DATE Qwner/Applient: Dwta _ �w � Name Street Ad s ' � 1�a city State Zip Telephone. NS) -)yxw- -_- Applicant Representative: e etc- for, Nam . _AW1 Qwtr L \ham' �. Street Addre s 1WR.,� City Stale Zip Telephone: NIS) -M-KA2 Email address (optional): Bmail Address (optional): T 1 s �fAx 4as 1-7 5 8395 W F4 C-t.r '' . '4LF-- O. July 4, 2004 SEP 0 .3 2004 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS Eaglewood Homes, Inc. 18607 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation / Foundation Recommendations Reasonable Use Exemption Eaglewood Homes proposed 3 residence development 722 Daley, Edmonds .4,,Vo This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Eaglewood Homes property at 722 Daley, Edmonds, Washington: This evaluation was required due to owner/ developer concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements for reasonable use exemption to steep slope standards. REFERENCES: • Location Map • Property Survey (furnished by Eaglewood Homes) • Photographs BACKGROUND: The property at 722 Daley, is rectangular in shape and is understood to consist of several 30 feet wide parcels. (See survey map). Currently, the overall property contains a single family: residence: Access to the existing residence is via the alleyway south of Daley Place. . The property contains some slopes in excess of 40 percent. The slopes are primarily abutting Daley Place (to the north) and the private property to the east. The sloped portions of the property steeper than 40 percent are heavily vegetated with mature trees, shrubs, and grasses. The existing garage structure (at the eastern portion of the overall property)' contains some lower stabilization walls consisting of stacked concrete segments. See photographs. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE DESIGN & PERMIT LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 Shoreline, Washington 98155 (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 Eaglewood Homes, In . July 4, 2004 Page 2 It is understood that Eaglewood Homes proposes to "short play' the "Overall. property to result in 3 new single family residences. It is further understood that access to the new 3 residences will be via the existing alleyway. Visual, evaluation of the overall property reveals no evidence of any geotechnical distress: no slide, no sloughing, no soil tension cracks, nor any evidence of erosional degradation. This engineer. observed that the existing residence.does not have a .functioning tight line. storm water system. Rather, gutter down spouts merely "dump" onto the surface. Nevertheless, no evidence of erosional degradation was observed. EVALUATION: In order to augment site geotechnical information, and acquire data for the. reasonable use exemption to sleep slope standards, 4 soil test holes were dug by power hand auger to depths of 5.5 feet on July 1, 2004. The findings of all four test holes revealed similar sub -grade conditions, namely: 0" to 6" Duff, roots, and intermittent organic silt. 6" to 5.5, Dense sand. Relatively clean dine to coarse sand. No water was encountered in any of the test holes. Test hole walls remained vertical and stable for six hours (prior to backfilling). No sloughing. or caving.oc curred. This engineer has performed numerous geotechnical investigations in the . immediate.areas and verifies that the dense native.sands are stable and provide excellent bearing support for foundation development. The sub -grade soils are consistent with the deposits on the geologic map of the Edmonds East and part of the Edmonds West quadrangles by James P. Minard (Department of the interior, United States Geological Survey, 1983, Map MF —1541 Advance Outwash). CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this engineer's investigation as well as experience in the area with similar projects, the Eaglewood Homes property at 722 Daley is aeotechnically approved for the proposed 3 new residences, subject to the following: a� lewood Homes In*... E• 9 July 4,. 2004 Page 3 • Geotechnical review of specific house plans. by this engineer prior to permit issuance • Temporary shoring may be required, depending on specific house plans. • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 P.O. • : Temporary Shoring: For the south property line cuts (up to 12 feet in depth) temporary shoring consisting of staggered Ecology Blocks maybe used (see attached Eco-Block.Shoring Design. Geotechnical inspections by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual. spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18)-and twenty-four (24) inches; respectively, and should be bottomed. at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some over -excavation may be required below ,footingsto expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill.the over excavated hole, the width of the over -excavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of"two times the depth of the over -excavation and the footing width. For example, an over -excavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (2,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in"this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. ewood Homes In� • Eagl , :.. July 4, 2004 Page 4 Laferal `loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundationsand the bearing soils or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical; embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill`placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Design Value Coefficient of Friction . 0.55 Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Where: - - (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We" recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to- lateral loading: SLABS -ON -GRADE: " Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on. structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be.re=compacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick.. We also recommend using. a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the ..slab with minimum. overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes.. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures: The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height, which restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value _ Active Earth Pressure" 35 p.c.f. Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Soil Unit Weight 125 p.c.f. Eaglewood`Homes, In July 4, .2004 Page 5 Where: (1) p.c.fis pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot defect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and . retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls:' We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic- pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added. to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and . foundation. walls within a distance equal to the. height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand=operated equipment..-,... Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent... Due to their high silt content, if the native. soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Wei. and Enkadrain, should be placed. against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system.. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria. for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: NOTE: Excavation greater than 3 feet will require temporary shoring:. At the time of this report, project developer had not finalized house plans. Experience has shown that temporary shoring consisting of eco-blocks will provide' sufficient stabilization for. cuts up to 10 feet in depth. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical.. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper.than 1:1 (Horizontal: Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 2H:IV. It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly,. and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled overlhe top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended.at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi I40N,. Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point; the perforated pipe invertshould be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in any of the 4 test holes. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation. occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow 'connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation of the site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or, pavements are.to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas re conte All structural fill should be placed in horizontal `lifts with .a moistunt at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is.that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type- compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to -compact the lift..In no�case should.the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following`table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Minimum Relative Compaction . Beneath footings, slabs or walkways 95% Behind retaining walls 90°r6 Beneath pavements 95 for upper. 12 inches - Beneath Sub -grade, 90% below that level ; Where:. Minimum relative compaction. is the ratio,. expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor)., Eaglewood Homes, Inc. July a, 2004 Page 8 Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather,- orwhen the sandy,'on-site soils are wet, site preparation costs maybe higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are sandy and thus are both particularly moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content. ; Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening ands::: °pumping°from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill, which is to be placed in wet weather;. should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from. that portion'of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceotable if the upper organic materials are segregated and moisture contents are monitored byengineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: = No drainage problems were evident with the existing residence and property at 722. Daley. As noted, the existing residence has downspouts "dumping". on the surface. Nevertheless, the sandy sub -grade soils obviously infiltrate storm waterrunoff properly. An open drainage course exists to the east and under Daley Place: It is understood that the future 3 residence develd mentswill comply with City of Edmonds drainage standards and release storm water flow into the existingCity of . Edmonds stone system. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5A/2 sacks per cubic yard.of concrete mix. REASONABLE USE EXEMPTION: Based on the geotechnical investigation in dense su"rade sands present on the site, as well as specific experience with similar properties in the immediate area, this Exviaes 11. W tl a DMB: jpb �00 Dennis M. Bruce, P. E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer I.0c.1S91) CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.ci.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering June 24, 2005 Craig Reimer Eaglewood Homes, Inc. 18807 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: 716 Daley Place —Request for a Driveway Slope to Exceed 14% Dear Craig, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR This letter is in response to your letter dated May 26, 2005, and our meeting on site May 27, 2005, to discuss the driveway slope issue at the above address and to make a determination on your request. In addition, this is a follow-up to our on -site verbal approval May 27, 2005 to allow a small triangular portion of the driveway to exceed the permissible slope allowed by the code because of the grade of the alley and other physical restraints. After inspecting the site, we determined that most of the driveway at the subject address does not exceed 14%; however, there is a triangular portion, located at the southeast corner of the driveway and adjacent to the alley, that not only exceeds the required 14%, but exceeds the maximum allowed of 20%. Based on the severe slope of the alley, which is approximately 22%, and the topographic restraints of the surrounding properties, it is evident that it will be impossible to bring that triangular portion of the driveway into compliance without significant reconstruction of the alley and surrounding properties. Because there is just a small part of the driveway that will exceed the limits established in the Chapter 18.80.0604D of the Edmonds Community Development Code, we do not feel public health, safety and general welfare will be affected if that portion were to remain. In addition, reconstruction of the alley and surrounding properties to bring the driveway into compliance would be significant and cost prohibitive. Therefore, your request for the driveway slope waiver is approved for that triangular portion of the driveway and the driveway may remain as constructed. Sincerely, Lyle Chrisman Engineering Program Manager alc S:\ENGR\PRIVATE DEVELOM ENT PROJECTS\CORRESPONDENCE\Driveway Waivers\716 Daley Place dw memo.doc ° Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinari, Japan fhc.18c10 CITY 'OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.ci.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT. SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning � Building • Engineering June 24, 2005 Craig Reimer Eaglewood Homes, Inc. 18807 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020Y��� '�Iz 0U:�- 716 Daley Request for a Driveway Slope to Exceed 14% Dear Craig, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR This letter is in response to your letter dated May 26, 2005, and ;our meeting on site May 27, 2005, to discuss ,the driveway slope' issue. at the above address and to make a determination on your request. In addition, this is a follow-up to our on -site verbal approval May 27; 2005 to allow a small triangular portion of the driveway, to exceed the permissible slope allowed by the code because. of the grade of the alley and other physical restraints. - After inspecting the site, we determined that most 'of the driveway at the subject address does not exceed 14%; however, there is a triangular portion, located at the southeast comer -of the driveway and adjacent to the alley, that not only exceeds the required 14%, but exceeds the maximum allowed of 20%. Based on the severe slope of the alley, which is approximately 22%, -and the, topographic restraints of the. surrounding properties, it is evident that it will be impossible to bring that. triangular portion of the driveway into compliance without. significant reconstruction of the alley and 'surrounding properties. Because there is just a small part of the driveway that will exceed thel limits established in the Chapter 18.80.0604D of the Edmonds Community- Development Code, we do not feel public health, safety and general welfare will be affected if that portion were to remain. In addition, reconstruction of the alley and surrounding properties to bring the driveway into compliance would be significant and cost prohibitive. Therefore, your request for the driveway slope waiver is approved for that triangular portion of the driveway and the driveway may remain as constructed. Sincerely, 4Lykl�e Chrisman Engineering Program Manager alc S:\ENGR\PRIVATE DEVELOMENT PROJECTS\CORRESPONDENCE\Driveway Waivers\716 Daley Place dw memo.doc Incorporated"August 11, 1890 $icfor 1-ifir - Polrinnn Jnnnn SIDE SEWER 6" WYE W/ 4" Reducer 6" C/O @ grade T deep 22' Bend @ 5' deep of E.D* CITY OF EDMONDS WATERLINE AS -BUILT ADDRESS HOMEOWNER v� 716 Daley St. Craig Reimers CONTRACTOR SCALE Eaglewood Homes NTS DATE DRAWN PERMIT 1890 3/16/2005 BY Nima M.Moghaddam NO- 2004-2890 A-0 4 . • �� a ZL emu ' qj1 ? �l Y n• 4 r bfBr 00 (�ir% � YIiIJLi f /p p �L CITY F E 'WATER. AS -BUILT ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER Z_ ©O 4- — 2 HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR' DATE 3��(p/05 DRAWN C ' ' ate ofOccupancy DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS PER INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE,SECTION .R110 AT: 716 Daley St'. Building,�Permit #:':. 2004-0890 Occupancy established by this certificate: a, .R3 Dwelling Units:; 1 No. Stories: 2 Basement: NIA. i {' =°' `� Type of Construction: VB �v-;fin• t Y 4 Owner of building: Eaalewood Homeslnc.k as 4 •.. 1 1 _ :,i J'�'. ':3� < ... ,I•. The Sinale Family Residence at 716 Daley St hasrbeQn4inspectedrand approved complying with the requirements of the 2003 edition of the International Residential Code as adopted ft thesCitysfor;the; group and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified. Issued this 14`h day of June . 2005 Chief Building Official RESTFILE. By: Any change of occupancy or use requires a building permit and a new Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official. 14C.189v CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www dedmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering October 19, 2004 Mr. Craig Reimer Eaglewood Homes, Inc. 18607 Olympic View Drive Edmonds WA 98020 RE: Installation of Sewer Laterals for 716 and 726 Daley Street Dear Mr. Reimer: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The City has awarded a capital project construction contract to replace the sewer main and existing sewer laterals .on Daley Street. Construction is scheduled to begin in November 2004. You have requested that the City have the contractor install new sewer laterals to the properties that you plan to develop at 716 and 726 Daley Street, where sewer laterals do not presently exist. We agree to have our contractor install the two new sewer laterals requested, provided that you submit payment to the City, prior to installation of the sewer laterals, to cover the estimated full cost to the City of this additional contract work, including the City's administrative cost. The cost for each sewer lateral installed under the contract will be the contract price of $1,800 per lateral, plus the contract price for side sewer tees and sales tax. We will also require an additional 15% to cover the estimated amount of the City's administrative costs. Therefore, the estimated total cost to you will be $4,558.55 as follows: • 2 sewer laterals X $1,800 each = $3,600.00 0 2 side sewer/lateral tees X $20 each = $40.00 • Subtotal $3,640.00 • Plus: Sales Tax (8.9%) _ $323.96 • Subtotal $3,963.96 • Plus: 15% City Admin Cost $594.59 • Total $4,558.55 This $4,558.55 amount is based upon the contract unit prices and estimated quantities. It assumes that no additional unsuitable excavation and foundation stabilization, imported backfill, or asphalt trench patch will be required for your sewer lateral installation, which we believe will be the case. However, if any of these items turn out to be required, they will increase the contract cost to the City based upon the contract unit prices and actual quantities installed for these items, and you will be required to provide additional Incorporated August 11, 1890 • lister rite - Hokinan .lAnAn payment in the amount of the additional contract cost for these items plus 15% for City administrative cost. The sewer laterals to be installed will include a 6 inch PVC sewer lateral pipe, connected to the City's sewer main in Daley Street, with a cleanout and stub at the edge of the right of way (property line), per City standards, for future connection of the houses you plan to construct on these lots. Upon installation, these sewer laterals from the sewer main to the cleanout at the edge of the right of way will be owned and maintained by the City. In addition, the City's. standard sanitary sewer connection charge and other applicable fees will still be required. If you want the City to install the requested sewer laterals to your properties, please submit a check made payable to the City of Edmonds in the amount of $4,558.55, with a cover letter confirming your understanding of the above conditions, addressed to Mr. Duane Bowman, Development Services Director, prior to November 1, 2004. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at 771 0220. Sincerely DAVID K. GEBERT, PE City Engineer Cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director fr�c.189v CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.d.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering October 14, 2004 Craig Reimer Eaglewood Homes, Inc. 18607 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 SUBJECT: Sidewalk Construction 7 6 726 and 730 Rale Street . Dear Craig, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The City is in receipt of your request for a waiver of the sidewalk installation and street widening requirements, dated October 12, 2004. While sidewalks are required as a condition of approval per the Sidewalk Construction Policy contained in the adopted in the December 2002 update to the City of Edmonds Transportation Plan and ECDC 18.90.030, you have requested that the City review this project site and code requirements for a determination of economic unfeasibility (Sidewalk Construction Policy 3.2.b). As stated in your letter, there is a 10 foot and greater grade change between the existing edge of pavement and the property line. In order to construct sidewalks along this section of Daley street the asphalt roadway would have to be widened and a sizable retaining wall would be required in order to support the cut in the slope. The benefit of a sidewalk and retaining wall within the City right-of-way at this location does not out weigh the cost of engineering, design and construction, and therefore, the City is in concurrence that this is economically unfeasible in accordance with ECDC 18.90.030.B DETERMINATION: The City of Edmonds has determined that sidewalks will not be required as a condition of approval for the construction of the single family residences at 716, 726 and 730 Daley Street. ave Gebert, City Engineer R4 Chave, Planning Manager c: street file permit file • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • c:-`- '—: -- T' -1-0- - - 0 0 18607 Olympic View Dr. Eaglewood Homes, Inc. Edmonds, WA 98020 /D �7r (425) 771-6822 060 (425) 775-8395 fax V�� t October 12, 2004 Dave GebeE Y f ® City Engineer am City of Edmonds 121 5 Ave. N. 0 C T 1 2 2004 Edmonds WA 98020 Re: 716 Daley St. building permit, plan check #04-411 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Future building permit applications for 726 and 730 Daley St. Dear Dave: I am writing to request a waiver of the sidewalk installation and street widening requirements for the above referenced building sites pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code 18.90.030 which states that "with the approval of both the planning director and city engineer, the requirements of this chapter may be waived, if it can be demonstrated by the applicant that there are special circumstances related to topography or other factors which make the construction of the sidewalk economically unfeasible or practically impossible." The lots are on the south side and above Daley St. The topography rises from an elevation of 98' at the edge of pavement of the road to an elevation of between 108' and 114' at the property line. Widening the street and installing a sidewalk on Daley St, is practically impossible. It would require the installation of a 6' to 10' tall retaining wall in the City right of way. This retaining wall would increase the city's exposure to liability. The cost of the installation of the retaining wall and the hookup of utilities under the retaining wall make this requirement economically unfeasible. Due to the topography, it is not possible to take access off of Daley St.; but rather all vehicle and pedestrian entries and exits will be from the alley that accesses to 7t' Ave. N. The development of these lots will not affect pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic on Daley St., where these improvements are proposed to be made. The future homeowners will have no impact on, or use of the proposed sidewalk. The benefit to the city is low because Daley St. is a dead end, low vehicle traffic street with no current or foreseeable traffic hazard. As requirement of approval, Eaglewood Homes is already required to improve the City alley to a paved width of 12' along the entire south property frontage. Requiring frontage improvements along both north and south property lines would impose excessive economic requirements. I appreciate your looking into this matter. Please call me if you have any questions. Si erely, Cr Reimer RECEIVE® President OCT 12 2004 ENGINEERING DIVISION STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM WORKSHEET WeVA 1�w cam, ,OWNER � CALL BY: Cw,,. W\\w__ 1�n �01��1 , ADDRESS PHONE: lkN r\t5 VA AM DATE: *****DESIGN DATA***** IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE LG ORIFICE. o� s�3ed PA' • DCTENTION PIPE LENGTH OCKING LID . (TYPICAL) FINISHED G ' MINIMUM TiGMTL MEASURED FROM TOP OF CONC DOX OR RISER .DY. TO IX SLOPE �TL�FT OUTLET CONTROL MIN. UPPER CATCH BASIN ,ORIFICE ' CONTROL CATCH BASIN . SYSTEM CROSS SECTION. 2'X21X6' DEEP, 4-6' SPALLS OR EQUAL FROM CONTROL. CD 21X 21X 3' DEEP,•3/4' CRUSHED ROCK XISTING GRADE FROM CONTRA OITLE VASHED ROCK OUTFLOW TR MIN 10' LdM T �sy PERF. PIPE 8 LEVEL PERRfF��CP[PESS W/ END LCAP�Sp �,�• PRIORMTOHPLACEMENI WASHED ROCK OF DRAIN AIPA p ouriar RUNOFF SPREADER -TRENCH FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED 70 DETENTION SYSTEM NOTES: 1. Call Engineering Division (771-MO) for a tightline and detention system inspection APPROVED BY before backfilling and for final inspections. 2, Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the ICJ/� / responsibility of the property owner. Material accumulated in the -storage pipe must be flushed 6 e out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. The outlet control orifice DATE must be kept open at all times. 6 _ . STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM �► WORKSHEET �e�ra� 1�a cam,CW\1- . QvVNER CALL BY. �01 PHONE: ADDRESS T A1'N1�� VA V)o DATE: WWD� * "."DESIGN "DESIGN DATA «.,► *. IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE LG ORIFICE • DCTENTION PIPE LENGTH LOCKING LID XTYPICAL) FINISHE3,G MINIMUM �EpRp ETIOF FORRDMNS ` CONC BOD RP .SY. TO IX SLOPE OUTLET CONTROL MIN. UPPER CATCH BASIN ,GRtrICE ' CONTROL CATCH BASIN • r SYSTEM CROSS SECTION 2'X2'X6' DEEP, 4-6' SPALLS OR EOUAL FROM CONTROL CD 2'X 2'X 3' DEEP, 3/4' CRUSHED ROCK xISTING GRADE r FROM CONTROL OUTLET WASHED ROCK • OUTFLOW TRENCH, MIN 10' LdNG. PIPE TO BE LEVEL i�PERT PERgFNNCPIPEgg V/ END CAPS p T PR IORHTOHP�LACEME�� OF VIASFIEDASN ROCK NPJUP OurLer RUNOFF SPREADER -TRENCH FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED 70 DETENTION SYSTEM NOTES: .07 1. Call Engineering Division MI -MO) for a tightline and detention system inspection APPROVED BY before backfilling and for final inspections. 2. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the 10/ rtsponsl'bility of the property owner. Material accumulated in the. storage pipe must be flushed ` 4e out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. The outlet control orifice DATE must be kept open at all times. 6 - . riV (425) 775-0531 (206) 622-8480 .(425) 885-3566 PROPOSAL (360) 659-1170 Fax (425) 776-2189/Sc� 6410 212th Street SW, Lynnwood, WA 98036 6 :S www.townandcountryfence.net DATE 5 /'-/09 FENCE TowNCF*344L7 ' CUSTOMER, . �. JPvI►n i .S t-t i � � RES.c/a ADDRESS t'' O. 6y �C �C 7S BUS. :•,' CITY LA ZIP 5�00 FAX. Quality Fencing. since 1965 ATTN: ` CEL.. Length Height Walk Gate;' Drive Gate Fence Style iX�( mop P��i CHAINLINK FENCE Wire Ga. Top Rail Line Posts Term. Posts Barbed Wire / :Tension Wire Concrete 02,10 WOOD FENCE Cedar Boards, Framework a s Post Post Spacing Pipe Base �L To Grade Stairstep " 40 Facing 4- Gate Top Flat Rnd Dip Tear Out ho Haul Away Dial - Dig e6 JOB. SITE . // 1Ur're� Jfofvrarrr�G/5 CUSTOMER RESPONSIBLE FOR PERMIT WHERE REQUIRED i—f I j j • r pus E - I i ' t - -- - Customer advises and warrants that he/she is either the owner - or agent of the owner - of the property described hereon. CUSTOMER ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOCATION OF FENCE and, agrees to, at customer's sole expense, defend and hold Town & Country Fence, Inc. harmless respecting claims of encroachment, claims of damage to underground utilities, and/or any other claims brought on account of the work hereinabove described. CUSTOMER ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNDERGROUND SPRINKLER SYSTEMS. CUSTOMER AGREES TO PAY FOR SAID FENCE IN FULL UPON COMPLETION. Further, customer acknowledges and agrees that, in the event collection of customer's payment obligation hereunder is placed in the hands of an attorney, customer shall pay attorney's fees and court costs thereby necessitated. PRICE GUARANTEED FOR 60 DAYS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED PRICE 33a�7 �;O S. TAX .4 TOTAL Date J ' 20 Customer's Signature Sales Representative 73' DALE AK7V4rlI ' SITE PLAN 1 aoe.a %� auoe SCWE I' _ CON�lCTIOK PROPOSED RESIDENCE OI �<4rs LOT COVERAGE CALC. -,, LOT AREA= 6,600 SO. FT. BUILDING SQ. FT. INCLUDING HOUSE, DECKS, FRONT -, PORCH= 2308 SQ. FT. 2308/ 6600= 34.96% e 35% MAX. ALLOWED TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREAS BUILDING STRUCTURE AS NOTED ABOVE=2308 SQ. FT. o DRIVEWAY & WALK=800 SQ. FT. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA=3108 SO. FT. `t 3108/ 6600= 47.09% MAX. HEIGHT CALC. jj A=110.5' I. B=117.0' 0``' C=113.5 IC7 D=124.0' rr AVG.=465 / 4=116.25' O u = SCALE: I" = 10'-0" i j MAX. HEIGHT=116.25' + 25'=141.25' ACTUAL RIDGE 0 137.0' 4.Lq duaarl, to w'ua i3L r I LEGAL DESCRIPTION _ I I DECK ! i FOR I I TOP PLATE ® 132.0' MAIN FLOOR @ 123.0' iParcel # 00434208400400 f GARAGE SLAB @ 113.5' Lots 4 & 5 , BLOCK 84. CITY OF EDMONDS• according to the P!ot recorded - - Ii, 7 — c.,; ! r in I I WORK SCOPE: -Z 1 ` o i -14 ! V ` � m 0 N. (D � n 4cl•.;me . of r lo.s er. r oc:; , I or.r ! 39 in Snohomish L"rity, 'fir'•,,, i i ruvKAl: � •'' iEl; I TO CONSTRUCT A WOOD FRAMED —11 L' I Rwe.AY 5• wvwLmow- W" 2 STORY HOUSE W/ 2 CAR GARAGE. �� . w �:: �. 10. 1 L*• I 60.0 V ! j i 15' WIDE ALLY Z Z > a > a 1O GLEN Si. ~ Z SITE a DALEY ST. — SPRAGUE ST. CIViC OENFER' , ?LA IFIELD/ j ,EDIdOMl ST. BELL ST. ! PRIMARY CONTACT: APPLICANT/OWNER/DEVELOPER: EAGLPWOOD HOMES 18607 OLYMPIC VIEW DR. EDMONDS, WA 98020 ATTN. CRAIG REIMER PHONE: (425) 771-6822 FAX: (425) 775-8395 SITE `ADDRESS: (. 716 DALE'( STREET EDMONDS, WA 98020 STREET FILE RECEIVED SEP 0 3 2004 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDc, �I� a- Lu 3 > DALEY ST. may P,>- S-,-b IQ -s. ------------------- --------- , —1 - - -------- - -- ------ ------------ - ------- LOT COVERAGE CALC LOT AREA= 6,600 SO. FT. io,WipecnoM I BUILDING SO. FT. INCLUDING HOUSE, DECKS, FRONT PORCH= 2308 SO. FT. 2308/ 6600= 34.96% 35% MAX, ALLOWED rb TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREAS BUILDING STRUCTURE AS NOTED ABOVE=2308 50. FT. DRIVEWAY & WALK=800 SQ. FT. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA=3108 SO. FT. 3108/ 6600= 47.09% MAX. HEIGHT CALC - A= 110. 5' AVIRM PROPOSED B = 11 0' RESIDENCE C-- 113'. 05' D = 12 4' SITE PLAN AVG.=465 4=1116,25' V` -0MAX. HEIGHT=116.25' + 25'=141.25' SCALE: I" = 10* " ACTUAL RIDGE @ 137.0' "+Ls6w- "k-o 4cww)- LEGAL DESCRIPTIONvun TOP PLATE @ 132.0' Parcel # 00434208400400 MAIN FLOOR 0 123.0' Lots 4 & 5 , BLOCK 84. CITY OF GARAGE SLAB @ 113.5' EDMONDS, acc:�rding to tne rl:o� r e c c r d ed In VrIume 2 cJ Plots net. Puoe-" a,; WORK SCOPE: hTO CONSTRUCT A WOOD FRAMED 39: in Sfioorni�;ii W,-j. ORSVIEWAY 2 STORY HOUSE W/ 2 CAR GARAGE. '10 60. 15' WIDE AL4 I.* z ui iO GLEN ST. z SITE DALEY Sd' o-3 SPRAGUE ST S1. S T. PRIMARY CONTACT: APPLICANT/OWNER/DEVELOPER: EAGLCW00D HOMES 18607 01-YMPIC VIEW DR. EDMOND3, WA 98020 ATTN. CRAIG REIMER PHONE: (425) 771-6822 FAX: (425) 775-8395 SITE ADDRESS: 716 DAL-EY STREET EDMONDS, WA 98020 CITY COPY RECEIVED SEP 0 3 2004 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS .-r Jun 00.05 11206p D. Bruce, P.E. 206-546-8442 P•1 1 / .� , r Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer June 6, 2005 City of Edmonds c/o Eaglewood Homes 18607 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 RECEIVED JUN f 4 2005 Subject: Final Report (Pending Final Landscaping) PERMIT COUNTER 716 Daley St.; Edmonds, Washington Now Single -Family Residence Permit No. 2004 - 0890 This engineering report presents the final results of geotechnical inspections (pending final landscaping) at 716 Daley St., Edmonds, Washington for the new residence by Eaglewoed Homes, Inc. City of Edmonds approved Project Plans . Geotechnical and inspection Reports by D. Bruce, P.E. INSPECTIONS* - This engineer t1as performed on -site geotechnical inspections for the new residence at 716 Daley St. Erosion Control; Contractor successfully Installed and maintained erosion control measures consisting of rocked construction entrance, siltation fencing and diligent cleanup. The sandy soils minimized potential for siltation erosional runoff. Final erosion control measures consisting of rockeries have been installed and are geotechnically approved. NOTE: Final landscaping has yet to be installed as of the date of this report (June 6, 2005), It is understood that Eagiewood Homes proposes to install ground cover, plantings and final elope grading at the north side. When all final - landscaping is Installed, this engineer will perform a final Inspection to Yam( - compliance with the approved Plans and good geotechnical practices. SOILS • FOUNOAr/ONS S/TfOEVELOPMENT /NSPECTION DRAINAGE DES/aNB PERM/T LEGAL P.O. Box 38502 • Shoreline, WA 98156 - (20a) 548-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 Z0-d S6£8 SLZ SZb SAWOH aoomH100A Wd LZ:60 S60Z-60-Nnr Jun' OB 05_ 11:06p D. Bruce, P.E. 206-546-8442 �.� City of Edmonds clo Eaglewood Homes June 8, 2005 Page 2 ev n: Previously inspected and verified. All excavation for'this project is eeotechnlcallY stable• Soil earin I g: previously verified and approved. a ina e:. Previously verified and approved. Roo keries a' bill n This engineer inspected and. verified that ail site. rockeries and the keystone block window -well wall were, properly installed. All rockeries and keystone block walls are geotechnically stable and approved. $UMMAFtY: All geotechnical inspection aspects, with the exception of final landscaping, hava been properly completed and are pipprond. If' here are any questions, do not hesitate to call. Bruce, RE. Geotechnical I Civil Engineer DMB:abj P.- 2 20'd 51.62a SZL 9Zb SBWOH aoomnlnun Wd ZZ:60 S00Z-60-Nnr NOV-28-2004 09:49 PM EAGLEWOOD HOMES 425 775 8395 P.02 Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer November 22, 2004 City of Edmonds c/o Eaglewood Homes, Inc. 18607 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Field Reports - Geotechnical Inspections New Residence by Eaglewood Homes, Inc. 722 Daley, Edmonds, Washington Plan Check No. 04 - 411 This engineer has provided on -site geotechnlcal Inspections for the new residence being constructed at 722 Daley, Edmonds, Washington by Eaglewood Homes, Inc. REFERENCES: • City of Edmonds approved Project Plans R EGF1VE® • Inspection requirements per City of Edmonds NOV [ 2004 • Geotechnical reports by D. Bruce, P.E. Photographs I)CITY SERVICES C7R. OF E MONDS INSPECTION$: This engineer has provided dal on-s!te Inspections during active grading and foundation work'for the new residence at 722 Daley. • Erosion Control: Contractor successfully Installed siltation fencing at the perimeter and down -slope portions of the site. Additionally, contractor provides diligent alleyway cleanup for access to the site (see photographs). Temporary erosion control measures are approved through this date (November 22, 2004). • Excavation: This engineer y2rifled dense, native sands during the excavation process. All excavation cuts were stable with no adverse Impacts. This engineer closely monitors the excavation soil pile at the east portion of the site. Excavation is approved through this date (November 22, 2004). SOILS • 10UNDArIONS • SITEDEVELOPMENT - INSPECT/ON • DRAINAGE • DESIONB PE/9MIr - LEOAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, WA 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 NOV-28-2004 09:49 PM EAGLEWOOD HOMES 425 775 8595 P.03 City of Edmonds c/o Eaglewood Homes November 22, 2004 Page 2 • Soil in : This engineer verlfled dense, native sub -grade solls easily providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. "OK" to proceed with foundation formwork, reinforcing steel and foundation concrete In accordance with City of Edmonds approved Plans and inspections. • yubsurfece Drainage: Not yet. • Rockeri s or Stabllf z L ff ! Not yet. SUMMARY: • All geotechnical inspection aspects that have been completed to date are approved. • Geotechnical Inspections are ongoing. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. �•E .�ooQC P�- EXPIRES . 1293/.3Loo penpis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer DMB:abj RECEIVE® NOV Z ' 2004 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS 18807 Olympic View Dr. Eaglewood Homes, Inc. Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-6822 (425) 775-8395 fax October 12, 2004 Dave Gebert / City Engineer R EC E a City of Edmonds 121 5 Ave. N. 0 C T 1 2 2004 Edmonds WA 98020 Re: 716 Daley St. building permit, plan check #04-411 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Future building permit applications for 726 and 730 Daley St. Dear Dave: I am writing to request a waiver of the sidewalk installation and street widening requirements for the above referenced building sites pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code 18.90.030 which states that "with the approval of both the planning director and city engineer, the requirements of this chapter may be waived, if it can be demonstrated by the applicant that there are special circumstances related to topography or other factors which make the construction of the sidewalk economically unfeasible or practically impossible" The lots are on the south side and above Daley St. The topography rises from an elevation of 98' at the edge of pavement of the road to an elevation of between 108' and 114' at the property line. Widening the street and installing a sidewalk on Daley St. is practically impossible. It would require the installation of a 6' to 10' tall retaining wall in the City right of way. This retaining wall would increase the city's exposure to liability. The cost of the installation of the retaining wall and the hookup of utilities under the retaining wall make this requirement economically unfeasible. Due to the topography, it is not possible to take access off of Daley St., but rather all vehicle and pedestrian entries and exits will be from the alley that accesses to 7fh Ave. N. The development of these lots will not affect pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic on Daley St., where these improvements are proposed to be made. The future homeowners will have no impact on, or use of the proposed sidewalk. The benefit to the city is low because Daley St. is a dead end, low vehicle traffic street with no current or foreseeable traffic hazard. As requirement of approval, Eaglewood Homes is already required to improve the City alley to a paved width of 12' along the entire south property frontage. Requiring frontage improvements along both north and south property lines would impose excessive economic requirements. I appreciate your looking into this matter. Please call me if you have any questions. jSi erely, Cr Reimer RECEIVED President ou 12 2004 ENGINEERING DIVISION Dennis M. Bruce,, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer. RECEIVED.:_= KE 0: 3. 2004 July 4, 2004 BUILDING ..DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS Eaglewood Homes, Inc. 18607 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Geotechnical. Evaluation / Foundation Recommendations Reasonable Use Exemption Eaglewood Homes proposed 3 residence development 722 Daley, Edmonds _L This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Eaglewood Homes property at 722 Daley, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner / developer concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements for reasonable use exemption to steep slope standards. REFERENCES: , • Location Map • Property Survey (furnished by Eaglewood Homes) • Photographs , BACKGROUND: The property at 722 Daley, is rectangular in shape and is `understood to'consist of several 30 feet wide parcels. (See survey map). Currently, the overall property contains a single family:residence. Access to the existing residence is via the alleyway south of Daley Place. The property contains some slopes in excess of 40 percent. The slopes ate primarily abutting Dale Place to the north and the private to the east . P Y 9 Y ( ) P ProP�Y The sloped Pions of the property YsteePer than 40 percent are heavily vegetated with mature trees, shrubs, and grasses.:. The existing garage structure (at the eastern portion of the overall property) - contains some lower stabilization walls consisting of stacked concrete segments. See photographs. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 Shoreline, Washington 98155 (206) 546-9217 FAX 546-8442 It is understood that Eaglewood Homes proposes to °short'plat" the overall property to result in 3 new single family residences. It is further understood that access to the new 3 residences will be via the existing alleyway. visual. evaluation of the overall property reveals no evidence of any geotechnical distress: no slide, no sloughing, no soil tension cracks, nor any evidence of erosional degradation. This engineer observed that the existing residence does not have a functioning tight line storm water system. Rather; gutter down spouts merely "dump" onto the surface. Nevertheless, no evidence of erosional degradation was observed: EVALUATION: In order to augment site geotechnical information, and acquire data for the reasonable use exemption to sleep slope standards, 4 soil test holes were dug by power hand auger to depths of 5.5 feet on July 1, 2004. The findings of all four test holes revealed similar sub -grade conditions, namely: 0" to 6" Duff, roots, and intermittent organic silt. 6" to 5.5, Dense sand. Relatively clean dine to coarse sand. No water was encountered in any of the test holes. Test hole walls.remained vertical and stable for six hours (prior to backfilling). No sloughing or caving occurred. This engineer has performed numerous geotechnical investigations in the . immediate areas and verifies that the dense native sands are stable and provide excellent bearing support for foundation development. The sub -grade soils are consistent with the deposits on the geologic map of the Edmonds East and part of the Edmonds West quadrangles by James P. Minard (Department of the interior, United States Geological Survey, 1983, Map MF —1541 Advance Outwash). CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this engineer's investigation as well as experience in the .area with similar projects, the Eaglewood Homes property at 722 Daley is aeotechnically approved for the proposed 3 new residences, subject to the following: • Geotechnical review of specific house plansby this engineer prior to permit issuance. • .Temporary shoring may be required,. depending on specific house plans. • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. • Temporary Shoring: For the south property line cuts (up to 12 feet in-depth) temporary shoring consisting of staggered Ecology Blocks may be used (see attached Eco-Block Shoring Design. • Geotechnical inspections by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete . placement. The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General'Earth*6*1 and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18):inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some over -excavation may be required below. footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean.conc rete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the over -excavation at the bottom must be at least as wide . as the sum of two times the depth of the over -excavation and the .footing width. For example, an over -excavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may. be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (2,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when . considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Eaglewood Homes, Inc. July 4, 2004 Page 4 Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by.fd on between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting vertical; embedded portions of the foundations. For. the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against'undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the. outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Design Value Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Where: (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density.. . We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors maybe supported on undisturbed,. competent native sbiili or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be re -compacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick.... We . also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6=mil. plastic membrane beneath the ..slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches. for sealing purposes... . PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral, -- earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these. structures.' The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height, which restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure* 35 p.c.f. Passive Earth Pressure 350 P.O. Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Soil Unit Weight 125 P.O. ` Eaglewood Homes; Inc. July 4, 2004 Page 5 Where: (1)' p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot defect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and . retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing:the walls. , We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic- pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist then those pressures should be added. to the above lateral P sloping pressures. Also if slo in backfill is desired behind the walls then we Will need to be iven the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the 9 appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not.be operated behind retaining.and . foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment.. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand=operated. equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics: This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system.. The purpose.of.these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is'not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation. walls. ` Eaglewood Homes, Inc: July 4, 2004 Page EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: NOTE: Excavation greater than 3 feet will require temporary shoring. At the time of this report, project developer had not finalized house plans. Experience has shown that temporary shoring consisting of eco-blocks will provide sufficient stabilization for. cuts up to 10 feet in depth. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, -state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical.. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal: Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the .excavation. Under, specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineerl excavation cuts may be . modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 2HA V. It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly,. warning. and without. The contractors should be made aware g of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the'top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil: DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches'of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invertshould be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface - water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in any of the 4 test holes. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation of the site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where. foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be cove with plastic t minimize red st c o min m ze erosion. Final site grading in areas Pe P 9 9 Eaglewood Homes, Inc: July 4, 2004 • Page 7 . adjacent tobuildings should be sloped at least two:(2). percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the.building is paved. >. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material.. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. NOTE: Specific clearing limits to be established at pre -construction meeting with City of Edmonds building officials. Structural fill isdefined as any fill placed under the building, 'behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, 'or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after. excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum -moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry. density. The moisture content Of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the.material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift., In no case should.the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended. relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Minimum Relative Compaction . Beneath footings,`slabs or walkways _ 95° Behind retaining walls go% Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12 inches of Sub -grade, 90% below that level Where::. Minimum relative compaction. is the ratio,. expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils If. grading activities take place.during wet weather, or when the sandy, bn-site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are sandy and thus are both particularly moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content.: .Moisture sensitive soils`will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill, which is to be placed in wet weather, should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles.: The percentage. of particles passing the No: 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. :, The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials are segregated and moisture'contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainageproblems were `evident with- the.ekisting residence and property at 722. Daley. As noted; the existing residennoe has downspouts "dumping° on the surface. Nevertheless, the sandy su"rade soils obviously infiltrate storm waterfunoff properly. An open drainage course exists to the east and under Daley Place:: It is understood that the future 3 residence developments will comply with City of Edmonds drainage standards and release storm water flow into the existing City of Edmonds storm system. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.). shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. REASONABLE USE EXEMPTION: Based on the geotechnical investigation in dense sub -grade sands present on the site, as well as specific experience with similar properties in the, immediate area, this &iig, ,DATE RECEIVED �..r J� Cf PERMI T EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS I USE PERMIT ZONE y��,r (7 NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESStj �� OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS 4A �Q�•�(.I d5��4 �( PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. w MAILIN ADDRESS 3 AAvP11 e V O 4 r1, c V Y� i LID FEE $ PUBLIC. OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCPApproved (3 RW Permit Required CITY ZIP T LEPHONE Na. "C', N� � EXISTING Street Use Permit Req'd d PROPOSED Inspection RequireAw Sidewalkq squired [;y REQUIRED DEDICATION � Underground A° �� � - \l i FT wirin re cared NA�M„E� "�Q)�� METER SIZE� i LINE SIZE r/ NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED Z YES NO ❑ Lu ADDRESS REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE ZIP � C�Wt\, T LEPH NE 1• hl NAME CBL*p�..j.....%.�. 0 g� ^ENGINEERIING.REVIEWED BY D TE C � ! ADDRE�S(� \, yr / rJ FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE cc LL (�T([ZIP Cy QvFV �j �ry T� I� 1 E I! STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE C ED BY VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION BOND ( C RE ❑YES 0 POSTED $ -• ^fir ;�j UA PROPERTTY}TAIX� ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEEM(PT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED ` HEIGHT ALLOWED -PROPOSED / 1� 1�V�1UV EXP /t Off% Ol.0,�ll NEW RESIDENTIAL ► PLUMBING/MECH LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED'SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT `'SIDE REAR / PROPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.) FRO U SS'I`DEr REAR ❑COMPLIANCE OR ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ CHANGE OF USE I 0� �56'0 a'G �I, 1' J �i/ _ PARKING LOT ❑ REMODEL ❑ MULTIFAMILY ❑ SIGN REQ'D PROIDED 166�t AREA P}.,gNNING REVIE D BY DATE IlREPAIR G�D��GFENCE ((Vp�®Al -� CYDS ❑ MA REMARKS ( X FT) ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER s 17 ZO GARAGE ❑ RETAINING WALL ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER 'CARPORT ROCKERY FIRE ALARM ' 04E OF USEAJUSINESS OR CTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CHE KED BY TYPE OF ON VJCTION ISI CC) OCCUPANT GROUP V y ,L/(7 G NUMBE OF NUMBER OF ' DWELLING CRITICAL AREAS ® SPECIAL INSPEC ION AREA O 2 STORIES UNITS NUMBER � ,,J OCCUPANT REQUIRED,YES •�JJ�r• LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/[BC109/IRC109 FINAL INSPECTION REOM 2 9 W& &WIF40K �r u`/C r R.,TbA46OV, 461A ' S VALUATION i —. $ �7 /Z;I1 - Description FEE Description FEE C( 5 Plan Check "z6), State Surcharge z y H T SOURCE G % LOT SLOPFt.% Building Permit City Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO: d t VESTED DATE Plumbing Base Fee THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO Mechanical t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC 7 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE /7 , Grading U SEPARATE PERMISSION. Engr. Review !' PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS nw PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION Engr. Inspection y 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND;SUCCESORS u� IN INTEREST, AGREES Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit ;. TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF i EDMONDS. WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY Fire Inspection Receipt �1�Q7 j ffq -,- FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE o DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE NOR Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due / = LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' s Recording Fee Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy:. and Fees are paid, and IN VJOL4TION OF E LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. W K C E ON INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. GNATU ( AGEN DATE IGNED OFFICIALS SIGNATURE DATE 1A13 bo hn-0-1w. 771-0220 ATT TION LEA BY DA E M 133 �1 IT IS UN WFULTO;USE OR OCCUPYABUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTILAFINAL (/ INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL ORA CERTIFICATE OF OCCU- PANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UB6109JIB6110/IRC110. ORIGINAL -FILE '• YELLOW INSPE OR 09/03 PINK - OWNER :• GOLD - ASSESSOR PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES .J 1' .,�� t r t Q...'1, �',,., ... ,�, ^4.v�,.,i„".,^,,.,,.1�•r�j �'...H.p„��., }'Yw•rY"1�....r. e. •n�.�_•. _.�- ..,i�.,.. .-..- ..i. City of Edmonds Permit No: ,o O RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: A'. Address or Vicinity of Construction: .f/ .) P a !' A! B. Type of Work The specific): Y S V`ea `1 Lia" +�.r .moo �. �•Cp7o�9 "I C. Contractor: Mailing Address: LAMa [ JI U State License #: a� I Lo .kx poi M A w, D. Building Permit #. (if applicable): faclifS E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Multi -Family INSPECTOR: ❑ . Subdivision Single Family .1 ro Phone'�w 9—� ` �. c9019 - 96 - qo; +3 3 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):_ ❑ . City Project ❑ EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT&T, OV WD) ❑ Other F. PAVEMENT CUT: (Q YES ❑ NO G. SIZE OF CUT -2S: X CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES ❑ NO INDEMNITY. • Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the .City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims. of any kind or .description whatsoever, foreseen'or unforeseen, that may 'be made against the Co -of. Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including,defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP; AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE , YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE, OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL, THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required. by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession.. 4 Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched- with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the. workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR -INSPECTIONS Signature., 0 (Contractor or Agent) w. Date: 3 -cry 0 ! i c. , fF"R CITY USE ONLY c-d� Approved by: l :G�f Right -of way Fee: ) &64 + I1 '. Time Authorized: Void After Disruption Fee/Fund 111: Special Conditions: i')' AiATri2on Restoration Fee: OJ-W t 1.-Ttl�t �'7 5 . V hi l � �# GL;��f1a�. Total Fee: �1 SSl416S, lily Q, 4,W. ' Z U4 ,Receipt No S'1� w _ 1 Issued by:: i Y" 'TA 14)60& �S m/ t :Wi 1c &AM OL. P44w�y- -- - - UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS. REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE .EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (P 5-771-0220, Ext. ' 1326 FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK. DATE: oZ tS Inspector's Signature For inspection requirements see Engineering.Inspection Information handout. NO WOIZK SHALL 111, GIN PRIOR TO PEIZMIT ISSUANCE. DAMy D. Pllchuck Contractors, Inc. Notes: Job # 107023097 February 23, 2005 1. All signs and spacing to conform Sheet 1/1 Rob Inglis to the MUTCD and City of Edmonds Control Specs. 2. Channellzlhg devices are 28" traffic cones. 4. All signs are 48" x 48" 8/0 unless otherwise specified. 5. Alert affected residents. NOT 6. Work area will be 18' E of CA of TO 7th Ave N & 159' S of CA of SCALE Daley St. avnn rnor avos SMOHfltlN avoa $ $ LEGEND • 28' TRAFFIC CONE ® WORK AREA TRAFFIC FLOW WORK VEHICLE SIGN LOCATION X 6' WORK AREAS ALLEYWAY CHANNELI7ATION DEVICE SPACING MPH tAPER TANGENT 50/70 40 80 35/45 30 60 25/30 20 40 s s ' s ('wit ' . 13 ---------- ' ------------- �/ � ;��..� 3IwYw. ,r.Trew....w..r�Mr�... �'M+rti►1.w�� r.a:w_� � �� "lk 7:�t 10 ■ 08.00 w ffff g ��4750 1^�0� ! co NON 1 00000 ous Z C9 pp m SZ :i, O C: m __ r "5'� Y� e'.9 �3, �7 I I n K �3 �p Sri C✓45 i DF �� De O m e+ '•r I (D •ao O ffia ` r 7 I -fnI,� �D CD PI nk Z- a I Q ` r CD it PRO FX —11 ZCN �. RESI �U N ,e mm 700 -�z • Fence mul t be locat o rivets pro rty. �K • Property weer m oea�i Ie r r�etor lining party I rem. i� g • Ftsee She hot ItM1 on or pmont mom to a ([' . any City Mom Wo � • . r fat recorded a d s 38 and I R0141NE C 4 3" �1SPH1;Li a tf i CONTRACT R S RES PRIV SWAY r C� OSI�N CON R FONSIB FOR a €' 0 y�,,, LK AND DRAT E 4 f APPROVED AS NOTED BY E RING ' Q _� r tot, iQ a Q Ail 4 IQ F '0 hAe a M - XP+ I v cn ~ n) 0 n C mCm m PRIMARY CONTACT, 0 A IDD 11(--'\n t\I T/ n� A J n i r-- n/ r-, r--i r 1 ,�, a `de r ' Y RECEIVE® MAY 141009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS 8"TREET FILE NOTE: OVERHEAD POWER 24'E DALE Y S T 999 H080HO 11/8" MPE IP SVC 31818 61 'S 2001 1 N3d0 SUNONO3 TIE—IN —/ 2" x 1-1 /4" PE TEE TAP 162'S CL & WE CL (___')S CL (___')E CL 7th AV ASPHALT CL 22' a 22, 5' SIDEWALK S—bound Lane N—Bound Lane 3' SIDEWALK r ► 'A .A ° • ° • ► r .A 60' ROW ROADWAY CROSS—SECTION N.T.S. N W 70/ -717 �. t^V N i.It Lj �►.. -N 0 � U a 0_ t 1� Ito CL I' 1� r' 'NJ IN ` I dNt tt — 8�G} ftm' .M.. .� 1520 020) � I I 110. 9'V-33' W $ SERVICE TWIN SERVICE 00 CL a ® 96 G 98, "Ell�. I I 3'x5' WORK r ja. AREA 5' ESMT E SPRA G UE S T '40' E o3 I ^� ps 873 -a8-7 LLJ I cca a N W 0 f L. PL 0 T PLAN SCALE: 1 = 50 ALLEY EOM 1-1/4" PE CAP 12'N CL & 190'E CL ( ')N CL (r_')E CL 1-1/4" x 90° PE ELL 7'S CL & 190'E CL ( ')S CL (—_')E CL PROPOSED 1-1/4" PE IP MAIN 7'S CL (__')S CL FITTER (CHECK BOX IF COMPLETE) Work area left in dean & anf2 condition Complete all Pipe Tables and Gas Pressure Stamp Field changes Red —Lined on as —built Material verified and Changes noted on paperwork All Valve & Tie—in _ oca_ Lions noted on as —built Note beginning of Main, EOM & Line of Main locations Show Rope Locations & Cul—de—sac Radius Foreman's Signature Company Date STANDARD GAS CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. FIELD LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. EXCAVATOR TO CALL "ONE -CALL" TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO TO CONSTRUCTION, IN WESTERN WASHINGTON CALL: 1-800-424-5555. IN KITTITAS COUNTY CALL: 1-800-553-4344 2. NOTIFY APPROPRIATE PERMITTING AGENCY PRIOR TO JOB START (SEE PERMIT REQUIRMENTS). 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS TO CONFORM TO PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS AND GAS FIELD PROCEDURES. 4• EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE PER PSE STANDARD PRACTICE 0150.3200 TECHNIQUES FOR TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND ANY ADDITIONAL LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 5. NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. USE iSi TO DISTRIBUTE FLYERS IF JOB IS LARGE, OTHERWISE HAND DELIVER FLYERS BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE LIST OF FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND INFORMATION ABOUT THE OPPORTUNITY TO PURCHASE AN EXCESS FLOW VALVE WHEN THEIR SERVICE IS INSTALLED OR REPLACED PER GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2550.1600. ALLOW ADEQUATE TIME FOR CUSTOMER DECISION AND RESPONSE. 6. ANY CHANGE IN ROUTE, PIPE SIZE/TYPE, TIE-IN METHOD OR ADDITIONAL MAIN FOOTAGE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE PSE ENGINEER OR PSE REPRESENTATIVE. 7. COMPLETE "PIPE CONDITION REPORT" ON ALL METALIC PSE FACILITIES. CHECK BOX ON REPORT FOR WIRE BOX (TEST LEAD) INSTALLATION. 8. PIPELINE MARKERS AND WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND RECORDED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2525.2500. 9. INSTALL MAIN VALVES OUT OF TRAFFIC WHERE POSSIBLE. VALVE MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND RECORDED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2525.2600 FOR ALL HP VALVES IF THE LOCATION IS NOT READILY ACCESSIBLE, AND FOR ALL VALVES WHERE PERSISTANT SNOWFALL MAY OBSCURE THE VALVE BOX. 10. TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL OVERPRESSURE OF ADJOINING SYSTEMS, NO TWO MAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS DESIGN UNLESS APPROVED BY APPROPRIATE PSE ENGINEER OR PSE REPRESENTATIVE. 11. SYSTEM MAOP DENOTED BY: rYSTEM MAOP_ pSIG 12• GAUGE AND MONITOR USE OF ALL STOPPERS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FEED. 13. RESTORE ALL DRIVEWAYS SUBJECT TO OPEN CUT TO ORIGINAL OR BETTER CONDITION. 14• PURGE POINTS AND PRESSURE TAPS TO BE INSTALLED PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS 2525.3300. AND 2525.1200. 15. MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE TESTED AND PURGED PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS 2525.3300 AND 2525.3400. 16. IF METALLIC PIPE IS INVOLVED, COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH CID TECH. --------- PHONE--------- 17. NOTE ALL ACTUAL FOOTAGE, LOCATION AND MATERIAL CHANGES ON THE AS -BUILT IN RED. FOOTAGE BETWEEN FITTINGS. ( ') DENOTES CD N C4 C1 CID '*4 CALL (800) 424.5558 2 BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG THIS SKETCH NOT TO BE RELIED UPON FOR EXACTLOCATION OF FACILITIES REAL ESTATE/EASEMENT PERMIT REQUIRED EDMONDS FUNCTION CONTACT PHONE DATE PROJECT MGR K. GRAY 206.418.4233 2/22/05 ENGR-GAS DRAWN BY P- MCGHUEY 206-418-4214 2/28/05 CHECKED BY K, GRAY 206.418.4233 ❑ GAS WK CTR APPROVED BY K. GRAY 206.418-4233 MCNSEG CP APPROVAL PLAT MAP 163.066 MAPPING 11 JOINT FACILITIES ARRANGEMENTS ❑ UTILITIES ❑ CONTACT ❑ PHONE# Fw PUGET SOUND EAGLEWOOD HOMES INC ENERGY 1-1/4" PE IP MAIN EXTENSION 716, 726, 7; )ALEY ST, EDMONDS 98020 DESIGNED BY PiLCHUCK CONTRACTORS INC. PrOJect Manager Contact Information: KIM GRAY CELL: 425-290-2678 EMAIL: kIm.GRAY@pse.com REV# DATE BY DESCRIPTION 3 2 1 COUNTY EMER SECT SNOHOMISH 5 1/4 SEC OP MAP SW-24-27.03 160.062 107023097 � Drawing Number. N/A SCALE: PAGE: 1°° 50' 1/1 ALL EXPOSED SURFACES TO BE COVERED WITHIN 2 DAYS jvt ff i 9 ARill WATER & SEWER §WffloNt REQ'D. �%771 92 '�XT, 1326 M ALC;Er)MATERIALTUNE SDR 35 SCH 40 N-12 F810 HANCOR FOOTING DRAINS NOT TO BE TIED INTO DETENTION SYSTEM Ito LPL II`F Ufp 11$ APPHOVED AS NOTED BY ENGINEERING 10� 22�200 ECEIVE® OCT 12 2004 B cIIv OF EDmoNDSNT 0 RIM C) Lu W-NIGM33 �o AM jf43PIL-VdaO bmaiins 40oz z 1 130 �7�1���Q 1�J Q'1-29-092� , ' r .. nj In r I ­71'—-- 77Z --.--1 M . 1�. .; . I. : L r.. .L', ... .. ,, . i I II I , - ..I .r .I. I r �. Ir I.. I I �1 L L ..� r I. I: .. .�. . z. .. - � ,;-7,�; ml- �t�---,t�,,-",�F,.T— '�,--F—,�� . .. . .I�`7I �" ;1111i;� I - .I �, ��-11,"` V �';tl Im;HH i, , �� 4 ' t' .1-,1;1"',- 1 . � ,4, \k ,,!,A- 1,'tiJ%It :"�,,�, j1.fI I "I)��j l ,1, ;�%) ,e�, I ,!, ,,�. , I ,- . ;i�I �: ;, . I 1 J�,r�­,A,)!"". -1;"J �',1 �, � ,r%,lI T�4q ., ,� ,& ,, , 1I;," .I 1,1` - �i 1Y 1�;"��"— ,r, .' :, " I ' � � �­�l ; � ,C. ,'4 . �, , �� ',�,,i�-l -�, ,,"rl 5y, ,)-, �,-,Tl�� 11 F 0 r% , f­,' �" , ,1;� ,,.­r,Ni"0"I, " r � 1�.. A--�j 1 rj� JQ "� ", �V - LI '�� r.: II �) 1 , � � ,,,,q�,f. ,"7.'" � - ' il L11��i,� ' �, ; ' , �, , , , I i; , ,", ';;' �' I ,�,)� "" j �L 4 ,, �' , �-,�,,,"��ly,'�"Y;"�j"��", ;l�.,�,`�T-I3 , Ip " �,. 4 rj,j I "", I � k ' ,r I f� ��� 1c. ,V ,: �I4 �I 'q-. 7"�� ­r fI �- " 4iLL �j,- ..- .­" ,� I �&lI . ;1 ,,, ' ;N? t�t,L �'I­,j,,��, �I , F. . � '� , j ' �' � �-"��;�����ffy �,, � k�' ;. , ' I -I. I1 " I .I - .."3; W��' l `,"" , ,�; I' �� a; I .: � . �I C� ,, I �,-. 4 ",t� '. " I, ), �r 7 :' � 'r " I. - .. , , .I. IL 2. .� . — 7 PI� r7 I>ULI,nLuau 1:, " nI ' ' ., . �L I. . I I I �r I I -. I , , 7t , I- I .. L z -'�- u =zR0c M c-aL0wu , - $. L)n oI I . ,E a L I . . 1I �- - -- 1 , ,, , I 1,�, I I� � I ) " I l -"----- L, �.wI I I ;�;; " ". , -.;�r ,* __- --- -�. . �w. � . :�� i . � I, r *". �- L 4 �� , . I .� .IL ��"/ - ..LL11 r - .1. --�-';- 11Z , .,�-f,"fi,,,".��;*, t 4rY,, , L - . I I I I DECEIVED0ELL ST ,4 ' I LI ..1 I . ..; . . �1 , 1 I I , . . � I r . OCT 1 2 200 00 . BUILDING DEPARTh, l. 4E N I ?4, CITY OF EDMONDS ** ,- . VIINIY MAP 4";1I rI I ��'L`� t � L�' �I �, - , , ` " .t.,"i, ," � ,, �� ' I «� I . , I ­ I i I L.I . -- I . - - L .. -'LL I rl-� .- . a . I . ­ - ----, � ---- ­ L --­L--.-. . -.­­".­­-­­- .- ­�--- ------- -- - -- - - -- . - - I ... r . * -. I L I I . I , - . r I ,. Lu . ' L . . , .jI . . I 'L - i . z 1. , .jj,jn. r . � . I r I �- I a. I . L uu 1. Lu I I r I L I �- r : 11 . I I l(n L I (n � . I : Z 0 . r r-- r (n tl- I z . 0) - . -ct '. . z 1 1. u I I . I v 2 . "') U r ON . i -- = - N I OL r L. (n (I 1: 'T z >�- In I , u. - U:,-*% L P"% .r r %.- I . � L ; L . . r I . I I .11 m r I CIQ I -�,)z 1. L L - I I :0. I I .L u I . , . I 0 . I - (3 I 'r I Ill 1, r r I =1 = m 91010 I x OCT 12 2004 C 7Y OF EDWNDS �777� "7. IMOMM= LU CC LU U_ Y; C=) Pip U T QD C,AVAT 0 p NON A' N 'OT rX NT ERAGE C D U y ff y D DRAI N S U� W ROO, F R T s M f 0 ALA- 0, OT NCLU ENTIO YSTE OR, 5HIKINKA :QUA T E H TI G'' H L I N E NE W ICH, DO AN f T 1vk I Rt U, ULATION5 Nt LU UN 5 5KLUN0. N IT 5. DO N -DE DE N A -0 0 D­ G f AU 5 U 13 13A5E MATERI AL5 A A',�,' Ul ARATE *KEEP F 00 TI N;G DRAIN EP 60 Of OML .......... S z N -S R FR DO POUT STORM DRAIIN LLJ Kim, STROET WAT15A & SEWER MWTION REQ'D. 4. Imt 'A Z p Uj r /00 0 Z ULJ. C) C\j U) \*to Zin UJ MATERIAL IOU. kCCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE (L Z SDR 35 0 SCH 40 lu (M, N - 12 0 F810 HANCOR ''0 0 z p". o 'R VA -NNW, AENC" FA Vif FOOTING DRAIN$ NOT TO BE TIED INTO DETENTION SYSTEM ITIE S DIN RFACES TO ALL YS cOVERED WITHIN 2 DA BE 0, E� Vilzvu L N 4t , P L p,_ C a 0 0 . ..... . .. X, J. A:L 0, 0 4 �7 ;_j �jj P�Ortej. # -::::0043,4.1"084'0400 5 BLOCK, 84 CITY OF EDMONDS, accordin to the Lots 4 9 plot recorded in Volume 2 of Plats at Page(s) 38 and 39, in Snohomish County, Wa. 51", WWI* 0 15 __/nIGHT-OF-WAY CG.NS71'RUC1`0N PLRMIT J AND INSPECTION REQUIRED Ito (12- 411t , APPROVED AS NOTED BY ENGINEERING Date: r... rib. ...... ...... ..... . . . ........ Ed RECEMED .......... ZC "I ON 'LEG L­ NOWN Parcel.,," # OOA- 14 2' 84' 0 0 :00 Lots .4 & . 5' BLOCK 849 CITY OF EDMONDS, according o e Plat recorded, 'I n Volume 2 of Plats at Page(s) 38 and 39, in Snohomish County, Wa. OCT 12 2004 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITy OF EDMONDS i-its Ej OCT 12 2004 BUILDING DEPARTMENT GTY OF EDMONDS, lu .' .... e . ... . 1. , 1. ,,. ,.:.. .,. , , .� r } .. > ". ,4 .. ., r:'" •�-�.�^]—�--�_. N , :, .• 4 ,,. } -.r 5. ,NI .. ., .. ., .. .. ._. ..,. ., sv .. .d ..,.. Y..: ._ :. - '!- 1 JvF. _-f'K•.,F .,t'-'_.—.t-��,,.'.—. _ _ 1 a "i S _ r a >^• s. ,-ram—rr ,,. — r �z.. l .c'• r V ,. .,} , , ,i .: , ,. I , f 1 { .1. .. , f. � � � 4' i ..Y(•. .{ � 7 i,S y1:. ,,..aJ..:... _._..6 ... _...,,.,._..a..............Y'r•,.,rc._. .. .. .,.1:...L ......-. .. _.:._r.... •u m..,, .v _..., .I.r ,,.. ... ,:,,_,.: , ..1 ., _, .. e., ., .e.,,,r....,f. s:..... ....., .. >.. ,,. ..,. ,.. .r. :.. ._ +„_._,...... a.. .. .. ... ._,. r.. ,..Y_ ... ., >. ,u.. .. ..:... ,._..,., r,,.,.. _.. :. ,:. ,. ... ..5 r.. .,.., _, . .. ..... .... .. ...._. .. ...... ..- ,.. ,..: � .. -,:... ,... ....... .., ..- .... ..: ... a .-_.. _ ,_r. ,. ,.. _ .. ...- .. .• ,.. .. ..r._. ..., .., -. c.,: ,. ,. .�a .., t.. M ,. .. ...... e.. .,.: .. , .. ,.. -. _ a s.'-F ,. ,.x ... ... .. , ... , .,. .._ _ '<�: 1, � .. ._ .. ,.. .. ... :. _. :. W J W � oil 6 Uj L 5MEET NO. 2 of ro OCT 12 20% BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS