Loading...
8432 OLYMPIC VIEW DR.PDFI�IIIN�III�IIIII�NII��N12641 8432 OLYMPIC VIEW DR BUILDING DIV I N Appli n 111 E *ETR 1�nON Inside Heavy Lines PE�MI�' APPlE� 94 , SOB - — NAME (OR —NAME •B, 5111E55) ADDRESS s E W MA 1NG f►D RESS � CITY ELEPHONE NUMBER I- U W ApDRE53 F E CITY U TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME Ir G �� 0 ADDRESS F V < E CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER F Z 0 V SYAYE LICENSENUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER Legal Description of Property (Show Below Or Attach Four Copies) z 0 I - IL E V N W 0 J u W A— ❑ NEW RESIDENTIAL ❑ GAS LINE NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 SIGN ❑ ADD RETAINING DEMOLISH ❑ ALTER (�ij l/\I WALL EXCAVATE FENCE OR FILL ❑ ( X_FT) ❑ REPAIR RE -MOVE �SWIM Z NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING F UNITS a NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE V W 0 o PLOT AIII N "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and � successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless i the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and tt agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, a s arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issu- 0 ance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce 0 any requirement of any city Ordinance nor limit in any way the 0 T Citv's ahility to enforce anv ordinance provision." LEGAL DESCRIPTION \.. SUBDIVISION SHORT SUB NO, PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING X1/A PROPOSED DEFICIENCY OF RIG T OF WAY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED ❑ DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED ❑ DRAINAGE PLAN REQUIRED ❑ UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED ❑ CONNECTION TO SANITARY SEWER ❑ SEPTIC TANK PERMIT REQ'D ❑ NO. ELEVATION OF PROPERTY CORNERS ❑ & FOOTINGS REO'D SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED CHECKED BY [.,1 4 METER SIZE BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE If REMARKS SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED ENV. REVIEW COMPLET EXEMPT ADB NO. SHORELINE REMARKS VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE YARDS LOT FRONT SIDE REAR COVERAGE FIRE ZONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I CODE HEIGHT SPECIAL INSPECTOR JAREA REQUIRED ❑ YES ❑ NO OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANT LOAD PLAN CHECKED BY THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX SHOULD BE CODED 31.04. REMARKS PLAN CHECK FEE VALUATION FEE BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL FENCE SIGN RETAINING WALL SWIMMING POOL Y C 0 U_ J m D IL W W F a 3 F Z W f F a W 0 F Z W f a 0 J W 1 W 0 F Z 7 f f 0 W a '11980 x -. �� U(I. UY 7`l•� +l. }dY tll iSJ - . ,.;•. 1��. I; -•-----------•- Date Subject: <-- r OJ "�` • -� �, � ___._..,� �, f'� �- Ave it>� ._` . • ' --� Al--------------- a G''.PV L Compliments of N RAY KRUEGER f ENNIS BUSINESS FORMS INC. �7 P.O. Box 7107 `- Seattle, Wash. 98133 t; (206)762 5770 or (206) 542 1233 FORM # Sn-C- `� f1i y. H z Q U a a Q C� a O U w O E~ -ITY OF EDMONDS Wfm1C No. -2?--0 -7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT j� (� 0 Issue Date RIGHT OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMITSTREET 0 6 A. *Address or vicinity of Construction 1 • Owner: -• T C 1 Cj 16,v- 1¢v'cn Na' me- Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code • Contractor: Name U ° 94 3-;� n (1n0A[%te- l i q AV Mailing Addressf FZ::�rir' lrin n rA S (A ) - A - Ci 9 Q City, State! Zip Code • Permit Issued To: -76vi 1 R gp ~LA • Type of Work to be Done: M • 14• T h � ��. r) A / • , Work in Connection With: Prkvcct e 6:CQ - f� Sub or Plat El Single FamilyM ❑ Comml. / Ind. ❑ Apt. Condo. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Yes ❑ No S at to License Number Telephone Number * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, in e or ega proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by re n of grang thister tt79A1.-�1� Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for wort' following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the E Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applican Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour not 775-2525, extension 220. to I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: Owner or Agent ae HOURS o yea YOU DIG patch fl completed, a Z4 1 90 * * THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES * * CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By:,..'P Time Authorized: Void after days Special Conditions: �_ V vto Pry ' r r (t�ia .- M i to Y C All. mend,me-n; —g �t R V CT" . �tnnr ( .I I�e,-, ►�t p' _ j d_/! �'`,.+ f ) Vl�t 1 �_n <' R f•TF%�N ,� nth o-Ci'Uf'�''1' Permit Fee:" Security Deposit: ) CNA0 0106 Receipt No.: ' 2-07 0 Fund I I I Fee: 1) (NA Street Cut Dimensions S$• ' x * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. December 1978 FIELD INSPECTION 6s, (Fund 111 - Route cony to Street T)er)-* Diagram: Contractor called for inspection_ Yes NO Work Disapproved By: Date: Bv: Date: Work Approved By: Date: Inspector: Encr. Div. December 1978 IhC. 1890 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771.0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering January 27, 1997 Tom Berry 8432 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR -0-4 / /2-7 /T 7 Subject: Response to Letter from Western Commercial Development Regarding Access Improvement Requirements Dear Mr. Berry, The City received a inquiry from Monte Clouston regarding Engineering requirements for a lot line adjustment or subdivision of your property. When an actual division occurs and a new lot is created, the property must meet the street standards for the number of lots gaining access. If a lot line adjustment or subdivision creates no additional lots and, therefore, no added impacts, upgrading of streets is not required. If division of your property occurs with a short plat of lot 1, the access road to the created lot will need to be to City standards for the number of lots using that access road. If you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220. Sincerely, James C. Walker, P.E. City Engineer JCW/sf c: Monte Clouston Planning Division BERRY.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan t - STREET CITY OF EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE V FILE DATE 7 -0- L-1 - FEE. RECT #,Z3� APO'S HEARING DATE: Cf APPLICANT Thomas B. Berry ADDRESS 8432 Olympic View Drive CITY & ZIP Edmonds 98020 PHONE 778-7067 INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY Property Owner - LOCATION OR ADDRESS .OF PROPERTY", 81432 OLYMP-IC-VIEW DRIVE -- LEGAL DE S CRIPT.ION OF PROPERTY N . E . 2j, SEC. 18, T .. 27 N . , R . 4 E .. , W . M . , EDMONDS , WA . VARIANCE REQUESTED: Improvement of 84th Avenue W. with an asphaltic concrete roadway having a width of 18 feet. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY USE ZONE: ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRETENT: STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY 1OF SNOHOMISH) Signature of Applicant, er, or Representative On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared -1i7',- <,< 3: 6c_,f,,�, who, being duly sworn,.on his/her oath deposes and says that �Phe has prepared and read the attached statements and has acknowledged tome that the recititations contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 -7 a . Notary iullic in and for the State of Washington GERALD W. LOVELL, P.L.S. . JURGEN P. SAUERLAND, P.L.S. `' LOUIS F. CAVIEZEL, P.E. L Lovell-Sauerland & Assoc S Engineers '• Surveyors • Development Consultants • Planners The applicant is requesting a variance to the requirement for.road improvements to the 84th Avenue W. street right -of -.way adjoining the eastern boundary of Lot•4,+'' as depicted in the short.subdivision application submitted July 9, 1979. The 1applicant proposes. improvement of this section of roadway with an-18-foot asphaltic .,concrete surface.. Currently, 84th Avenue W. is a vacated street north from the northeasterly -most portion of Lot 4. It is felt that improvement to 28 feet of paved surface would not be necessary to,facilitate existing or future traffic. Also: Vacated street (84th Avenue W.)-creates a•dead-end situation in which only local resident traffic would need be facilitated; Steep slopes in this area are not conducive to roadway .installation; and -MI The additional widening provided for in the road standard would require the removal of significant trees and ground.cover. 23106 • 100TH W. EDMONDS, WASH. 98020 PHONE 775•1593 /nC.1S90 12-8-97 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant Dennis O'leary 6632 192nd PI. S.W. Lynnwood, WA 98036 Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist #97-236 Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records. IMP;QRTANT INFORMATION TO BE NO PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY. The `DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a project -specific determination. MON.. You must submit a copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL -400 PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: cc: Rob Michel Note Attachments: 12 Pages * Architectural Design Board C:Reception\Jana\CRLTR.doc Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications Any other development permit applications. Thank you. Diane Cunningham Planning Secretary • Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer November 4, 1997 Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Chief Financial Officer Lynnwood Mortgage Corporation 6505 - 218th Street S.W., Suite 9 Mountlake Terrace, Washington 98043 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation - Lots 2 and 3 Approximately 84th Place and 182nd Place, Edmonds, WA This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the property at approximately 84th Place and 182nd Place, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was necessitated by owner and developer concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements. REFERENCES: • Vicinity Map (figure 1) • Topographic Survey Map by Chadwick and Winters, of Lots 2 and 3 dated October, 1997 • Site photographs (available) BACKGROUND: It is understood that Lots 2 and 3 are part of an overall parcel containing Lot No. 1 with existing residence, and Lots 2, 3 and 4 (see Survey map and plot plans). This investigation deals with Lots 2 and 3 with regard to geotechnical slope issues. It is understood that property owner wishes to construct a single family residence on Lot 3 and another single family residence on Lot 2. No development or construction has occurred on either Lot 2 or 3 to date. Lots 2 and 3 contain a "flatter" portion, as well as a more steeply sloped rear (southerly portion). The flatter portions of the lots currently consist of lawn grasses, with a few mature trees. The steeper (southerly) portion of the lots are densely vegetated with shrubs, bushes and trees (see photographs). SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PEPMIT • LEGAL 17814 8th Ave. N.W. • Shoreline, Washington 98177 (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page two ASSESSMENT: While not within the scope of this evaluation, this engineer assessed the existing residence on Lot 1 for any geotechnical distress. No evidence of any foundation settlements or shifting were observed. Visual assessments of Lots 2 and 3 by this engineer throughout the past year revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress: No sliding, no creep, no shifting, nor any significant erosional degradation was observed on the overall property, including Lots 2 and 3. In order to augment existing site geotechnical information, soil test pits were dug (by backhoe) urider this engineer's observation on August 9, 1997. See soil test pit logs (attached). The findings of the four soil test pits (plotted on the Survey Topographic Map) were very similar. Namely: dense brown, silty sand to approximately three (3) to four (4) foot depths. Dense to very dense grayish brown weathered glacial till (hardpan). No ground water was present in any of the four soil test pits. All test pit walls remained vertical and stable throughout the excavated time frame (approximately two hours). CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, Lots 2 and 3 are geotechnically approved for the proposed single family residences, subject to the following conditions: • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall provided the drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use a friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. • The foundations for the proposed structures may. be placed anywhere on Lots 2 and 3, outside of the dashed top -of -bank survey area (see Topographic map). In other words, there are no geotechnical limitations to the proximity of the proposed residences and the top -of -slope line. (It is geotechnically Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page three possible, but not likely, to properly construct a foundation on the steeper portions of Lots 2 and 3. This would require uneconomic stabilizing techniques and methods). To be clear, the geotechnical set -back distance to the top -of -bank dashed line is zero. It is understood that political or zoning set -back distances do apply per City of Edmonds requirements. It is important to restate, however, that no set- back distance is essential for geotechnical reasons. If desired, exceptions or variances could be pursued. • Geotechnical inspection by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. The proposed structures can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty- four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page four recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Coefficient of Friction Passive Earth Pressure Where: Design Value 0.55 350 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height which restrain level backfill: Parameter Active Earth Pressure* Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient of Friction Soil Unit Weight Design Value 30 p.c.f. 350 p.c.f. 0.55 125 p.c.f. Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page five Where: (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding: The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backf ill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. the purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of. hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page six recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in any of the test pits during the field work. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to .minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. Mr. Dennis V: O'Leary Page seven GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. NOTE: Specific clearing limits to be established at pre -construction meeting with City of Edmonds building officials and inspectors. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. - The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page eight Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to` rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident on Lots 2 and 3. Surface runoff flows generally westerly (from the flatter portions of the lots). This engineer recommends. compliance with the City of Edmonds standard storm water drainage controls. The surficial sandy soils are such that it is practical to utilize an infiltration storm water system. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. INSPECTION: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: • Soil cuts • Foundation subgrade verification Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page nine • Any retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement and compaction • Subsurface drainage installation SUMMARY: • The two proposed single family residences (on Lots 2 and 3) are geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and key geotechnical inspection during construction. There are no geotechnical constraints limiting the proximity of the proposed residences to any sloped portion of the property. As a practical measure, this engineer recommends the residences be situated no further southerly than the dashed top -of -slope line. If desired, however, it is geotechnically feasible to construct the residences beyond (more southerly) than the dashed survey line. GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF PLANS: Prior to the City of Edmonds issuing a building permit, this engineer should review the specific house plans for compliance with the recommendations of this geotechnical report. CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. DMB:vIb Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer EXPIRES I=Y 14I`t U ql— oB b �i oA::a; A Ar v15i8 B �a ^wn �i: A ld z N108 A le N nr 15 v -• " L ":,a AI c " er �,; B 00961 lsly d-c a,Acr,�iA N =A I dFd N I_ Ei3l " uro E a 1 is tl awl ,�. to j_ w = N Id Ar RRt�•y_ !i ON28 E j °i2B N AY ONZB • AI r� n w -n y, N N le Ar AY a y(9 `yl i ze Odert a:n^^ NdAY �N Ptll9 Cx:H -: 3m • nnr w!w Av " m „A wsv a , fBtl7A"W xl AV. Hl q.q�o 36Yiaoai re °`, 5S gn �i Ar 'IH `' • sv �; " i "�" iN AV H198"� d Aron' R Crl -I i It. 9 dam. m d 6 a E r d ,EMI e' •' i N " L lnw i �n Q d M ld Nl lil±!15 •_ " u d >• RR . � c 1 d sxns t>b z Rar 1 AV "e a "CNI`� G'b" dA d ld NIBS� (14 IR T (AY= "A16_ ld 1St6i lam A• N106 - to --$ +.+ " Y I . _ . "ant •' `yl. + . '✓%Y i " MIJi _ ♦ ,e 0R6 at N 13 N AY Vv S N 0MZ6 A n AY HIK apt' Ar �2� GCg ! g o °ii A, � e. x oa Nld Nlif u 8 : Id 0 E6 0016I �r To CO EBS wE LY �wir AY s )Id A10 JI`___h ___ �O she A,a .us6 ' : nrtdg a N ld N156. 1 N -6 S A 01 \iy�- N Y H16 aS f17 is A j 5� - iuv g� EA .'� AY c! " N1B6 I� fo \ b a I N r� Ar? s sa' B m e"g9xe ^" i�@� rule11 6^ s r-r g - § Qg c � 6 G I S AV 1 H16 a t " A AV �"twt_, •�� Q �b° NN Anot.lsr i( AV 'SIA vas = P 3 3�' 3 aos v�i ) "ev N W sz sAY G Nt[ u� AV _spy ¢ _: Lyi ���•.uj W :_raj'••rZS �� i me"liCs sAr"1f H19 r Fez AY 5 JH19• J.s, N'b "' �" ♦et.♦ $ N19 SI {8 q�I=6 = 5 r AVE; \ A� O�f" ? b / i x f: F YjBi "� 583E-- • L ONE ti N!I 8 AV I@ N15 $ S f AV sr H!► 8 w �'.y ♦ I AV QNZ• a �S AY ONZ W 51 [ a [ otl nI E i &ar u t a� O \ \ t t \ \ \ Yt t x` t t \ tt 4 \ <+Y4 \1 t 't \ t lf« • L�w'M �-?'y ! i iS Y 4i n\ # a?w! � � t ./� �,-, "•"�'-�f ti �r�•. � a.�`V � rp - rk r r7y.�� 1 � a4� AJSY Y �« • J ..•r.. _ -. .J. x`�~ >••`• 3` J;.ti ?-s,,-'�� �' a• .� 1 `! �'P 3es ` . Z " ,� is b �'• '�i - . i - y'i � vs i. t� / ✓.. '..r .. � �r1 l�T / - a .... \ liar r, �',r � 1 f -� ^l• � � _ �� \mil '��S4fr' � M u � - � ,? � r �r � r 7 may_. �c 3 ~'''' , , y,� -t• "'� �,,,,3�; x '"-'�'— � ,. ;s tvn- l �4 y� 'is 'r.' a''�" _ �..iy 4 ." :SF3: 4S6k� •5y , >AY r i 4S sl ff t=�•N VI City of Edmonds Critical Areas Checklist 4.0e. I S9\3 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this form,'the applicant should also submit a vicinity map or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner Applicant: Applicant Representative: "-YZA� ame Street Address LL Name �?QiV o0l�`f` (5,- 5k) Street Address Ci , State, ZIP Phone City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date Signature Date C4 FILE NO. �Z Critical Areas Checklist -------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 2. Property Tax Account Number: ` N(l 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; X' no If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical. rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ND ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: AID ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway 0 0 floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? ► JO Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ), 10. Site is primarily: forested X ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) IK 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: �)o ^ca chk.doc; Rev 10/03/97 1 f�7/Y •r CA FILE NO. Critical .Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/topdgraphy/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 22s L/ nil e- 14 0 ./—, 2. Property Tax Account.Number- ?-Z 302- r Approximate Site Size acrestor � uare feet): ij J Oti f `� LA-T 3. Ark • ( � )Zno- If 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; yes; how is site developed? - 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise . of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades oPgreater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: o ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water. & 6? ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? S. Site is in the floodway- AZQ_ floodplain _)q_ of a water course_ 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Y d Flows are seasonal? 1�L17 (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow V; shrubs ; mixed ; urban landscaped (lawn,shr ubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: For City Staff Use Only 1. Site is Zoned? rA mapped soil type(s)? rJ li e�•w4 19r.��.,i �a�✓d 3:> Wetland inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site? _ 4»:::GiticalAreas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? leoc ycS� SfceD -t- vNs-fr- S a90.199- City of Edmonds Critical areas ocr, �vto p�9 91995 Checklist The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a developm6it permit to the City — The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City_ The City will review the checidist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parc:el(s). In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc-) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary " assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: o wl 14-s : tF e (Z V Name Street Address City, State, ZIP Phone © ._ ignature IDate Applicant Representative: Name Street Address i . 5 .� City, State, ZIP Phone Signature uate City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Thomas B. Berry Determination #: CA-954" Project Name: Permit Number: Site Location: 8432 Olympic View Dr Property Tax Acct #: 4346 000 001 0202 Project Description: Non -Project Specific Determination: Study Required: During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site appears to contain and/or is adjacent to a Steep Slope Hazard Area pursuant to Chapter 20.1513 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). To determine if a Steep Slope Hazard Area does exist, a topographic survey prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor delineating Steep Slope Hazard Areas must be completed. Any slope over 40% with more than 20 feet of rise will be classified as a Steep Slope Hazard Area. A 50 foot buffer is required from both the top and. toe of the slope. A 15 foot building setback is required from the 50 foot buffer. For development of any kind which is proposed within the critical area, 50 foot buffer or 15 foot buffer setback, it must be shown that the development will not adversely impact the Critical Area or its buffer, by doing one or possibly both of the following depending on the outcome of the study: For development proposals which will occur within the 50 foot buffer, but no closer than 10 feet from the top or toe of the slope, the 50 foot buffer requirement may be reduced to 10 feet if a study is completed by a licensed geologist or geotechnical engineer which clearly demonstrates that the proposed buffer alteration will have no adverse impact upon the site, the public or any private party. All Critical Area Studies must be completed under a three party contract where the City hires the professional required, and the applicant pays for the study (pursuant to ECDC Section 20.15B.150). 2. If development must occur within the critical area, buffer, and/or buffer setback, and is not identified as an exception per ECDC Chapter 20.1513, a Reasonable Use Exception and Variance must be obtained pursuant to ECDC 20.1513.180A and 20.1513.040C). All proposed development of the subject lot must meet the requirements of Chapter 19.05 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. J If the property owner wishes to apply for a specific development permit which they feel would not impact the. Critical Areas located on the site, they may submit their proposal to the Planning Department for review. If the Planning Department finds that the proposed, development permit will not adversely impact a Critical Areas or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis. V' iJ. m ish October Name Signature NO Date 2 BUILDING DIVISION B Applicant Rl f"�5i ZONE NUMBER = ` '' �{r 8 PERMIT APPLICATION I^side Heavy Lines JOB ADDRESS, �y4fJ 0� NAME (OR —NAME O BUSINESS) LEGAL DESCRIPTION SUBDIVISION{' • SHORT-SUB_NO. _ it MAILING ADDRESS /, � �' 1 3 (`'�y J� ��'.' /L' ter.• Y .. MAP O v •r PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET ELEPHONE NUMBER ,•+. .-..� EXISTING % 7� WX' PROPOSED JJ/. w NAME;Yf F U DEFICIENCY OF OIGH4 OF WAY F ADDRESS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED ❑ _ u DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED ❑ DRAINAGE PLAN REQUIRED ❑ E CITY - TELEPHONE NUMBER UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED ❑ CONNECTION TO SANITARY SEWER ❑ NAME 4 4 r ' SEPTIC TANK PERMIT REQ'D ❑ NO. ELEVATION OF PROPERTY CORNERS ❑ O ADDRESS F U & FOOTINGS REQ'D E CITY H TELEPHONE NUMBER ' z SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED 0 U STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER CHECKED BY Legal Description of Property (Show Below or Attach Four Cop F r+ / W ' .J (1 1 •=ems '� ' / -'N O W J, ❑ NEW RESIDENTIAL GAS LINE ❑ NON-RESIDENTIAL SIGN ❑ ADD ❑ RETAINING DEMOLISH WALL ALTER ❑ EXCAVATE FENCE OR FILL ❑ ( X_FT) REPAIR D PRE -MOVE swim INSP. POOL Z NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF 0 OWE LLING-r F UNITS a NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE U c '� 7Lq W � l O�' � e� nr ei ad t1k_ TER SIZE BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE f I MARKS SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB NO. AR ALLOWED I PROPOSED JCOMPLETJ EXEMPT I SHORELINE ARKS VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE YARDS LOT COVERAGE FRONT SIDE REAR FIRE ZONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT REQUIRED GROUP LOAD ❑ YES ❑ NO PLAN CHECKED BY THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX SHOULD BE CODED 31.04. REMARKS PLAN CHECK FEE VALUATION FEE BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL FENCE I a "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and SIGN _ � successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless i the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials,' employees, and RETAINING WALL agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, x arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issu- SWIMMING Pool a ance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce p any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the IR LL .�- I City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the in- TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 00 formation given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly author- ized agent.of the owner. I agree to comply with city and state laws regu- ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL lating construction; and in doing the work authorized thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor Code of the State of Washington THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit relating to Workmen's Compensation Insurance. AUTHORIZES until signed by the Building Official or .NOTE: Permit Limit One Year(Except DEMOLITIONS and FIL9 ONLY THE his Deputy; and fees are paid, and PERMITS without conditional use permit, which shall be completed in 90 WORK NOTED receipt is acknowledged in space pro - days; MOVED -IN BUILDINGS' shall be completed in six monttis'�) -m � i A vided. SIGNATUR (OWNS OR AGENT) DATE'SIGNED x INSPECTION DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR'S SIGNATURE �/J1, �••J' ; 919�'GITY OF EDMONDS Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways.- 8 This Permit coven work to be done on private property ON�LYY;r Of PUS'+r, I J77;5-25�5419 TE -� - marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. n P �' ATTENTION t'1 ORIGINAL - File YELLOW - Inspector IT IS, UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE �y s PINK -Owner GOLD -Assessor t " UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC 304, 306�j to Y. Z 0 3 U_ J m 7 IL C W Q F Z W f F fC Q 6 W 0 F Z W i a 0 J W W O H Z F f O U 1 O Z-7 6 uivi3iuri ur 11­115 NKUPEr�3LJ8Z CT T TO THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN CITY OF EDMUNDS -Pg. No. 2 fl` \ kK, p° RECORD OF SHORT SUBDIV ILE #S--28-79. FILF NUMBER op I o�P of 01�ti T MAP a5ement sepa aIt 41teet may be se '�'f.o its m ; ' ovided it is not larger than �V" x 14" of Ch,-' rortii.icaltion appear- ing ht•1 f, �,. ;;�;rti V.i L lik [Alit L a0 0 0 1 � � I6 �� c a lC 3 . L c enJ. x29"5fee I 10.00' --- m rod wi fh cap u .'.IeGtrICQ� �Cr1 GtOnGr�t'"e �a5ement ►r,onumen-t' ; I� M LIn 2378360 h\ 9 8=32.7Li w° ° -�5883927",�� 1�/— -- -s �o -- > to i 1 L12.32 - - - L � kT) . to ac.ce5s easement r i0( ? and ttio 81 77 r ; I.00 , wa to r- o Fc a rri'fi I:.�"rf2'r!_� .� Gf_'_ T n.rtci '1 wafers �/ v� - t" 7 :3. / 9 ', 1- - _ me to •0 �' !J r ° �_ Ll . III + 1 E? ' L 5 rn 7t _ - ^ 11 �� < J�•��", , Nea.5'_.'?%� 78.8`I tV `X c 0 ;� 1 ,v - l o 3 N8�7 2 E a � o -_._i....,....._._...------ ° Z Side sewer C U) easeNR.co 1 -�easemr�nt t1� - 1 > .5;da 5e we r -- r, to 03� m o cfJ 2 6 p ►�, 952 ft� 18,591 ft2 1E,70S f12 1m _ TII�5PwCr casernenl. o. so _ 1►0 00 I 30 ,tiSt3°=tom c_I � I Ter liar I> 18'f,t h S f. t. 71i,wri t�• helow tliis line - ---...----.—...- - - ------ i I,Nrehy cerCify that this s1;o [' suLdivisiail -- 1ip'i�trs �oith-�la�=conditions _.u8__set forth in the Snohomish county Short Subdivision Code, Title 20, and is approved this T 'lay' of _, 19_=, subject to recording with the Auditor of `;nohondsh County and under the. conditions set forth in the attached Declaration of Short: tiul� ivi5� n�DMON.DS 8103100161 P. W. DEPT. ENGINEEP.i%iG QJ1V/., ExAr,AINtD AUT110P I7LD . 6Y ����-DA12f�1-�_. f:Er.W;ttS V. „ (Director of Planning) l `y- P,, V02 PAGE 5'7 C '�,�y"IHU1i1A5 �. !it►�kY 04�.'� VIEW ®R c) w .4,4,O2TT SUB DI VI S!ON Foe . i OMAS 8.. BEPRY. IN NE'/4 OF SECTION W.M. ,. EDMONDS , WASNINGTON STEFFANSON THO12EY JOHN ET AL SCALES! I "= 50' JULY 1979 Q ' Z ' Q N O 4 EX. ACCESS EASEMENT• Q HA2OLD C. ANDERSON w Lwli V • �l a 2 9. 000 .. 3p1, 5t� ANTHONY . S. TEPAS DAVID C. ALLAIS I-IAEOLD D. 00YCKE 30' 30' 30. E A S E 111 E 14 T ror a good and vriluablo connidoration, tho grantors P rant 7 hereby to the owners, rV and to future owners of: IN An easement for -thb"installat ion, operatibb and, 6aintebance''of a. sanitary._ sewer line over, across, through, under and upon the followin'9 described. property, situated in Snohomish County, State of Washington, to -wit: C) (%j >: in DATED this day of STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY or SNOHOMISH ) On this day personally appeared before me M. Vernon Rhoads and . Bertha A. _Rhoads_ tb:me. known -Ito. be.,the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN .'un'der my hand and official seal this 15th day of March 19 72 NO SALES, *TAX ...REQUIRED' MAR I G 19-12 YER* S RS tq _6� 6epu Y NotatPublic in and for the State of Washington, residing at Edmonds 0(( 70 &A 'tract 1,• 'Edtmonds Sea'piew Tracts, lying Iouth of county road and loge; beginning It the Northeast corner of said Tract 1 and/or North I/4 corner of Section 18, Township 27;.'" Range 4:''Qheneo South 00°2h' 17" West along the Bast line of said ?rack 56,16 feet to ;,k•:,4': the 8orr b line of county road thence South 6St�23'23" Went along South line of C104t t ;road 127,50 fogti -thence along arc to the rights having a radius of 263.18 fept'rwAIgtenas ;,of 98.40 Poet to the true point of beginning; thence continue along said arc`98 A ' feMt .�hln�e .`�+Y biarCh 71°49'97" West 16,1.5 fees; rhonce :toULIt 2"44'39" West 93.31 root; thenae`8otlth 03 26! Nest 98 76 feet; thence along arc to the left having a radius of 32.74 toot d'ists"CO ofw:yet,,.. 49.19 feet; the�ce South 8903P2l" (Gast 142.32 feet; thence North 28°b6'13" Weat; s8.96;. £ANiti at. thence �iorth 13 26'S4" West .134.'t9 Feet to the true point of. beginning; i.>c99 at;l Chat pfiicC�pR`,�`"..„� of Ttria;b l described as fol l.oas; Beginning at the Morth LA of the corner of $oat 00-4$� `• .�" t' ,. Township 27, , flange 4 a, 8- � •' ,"+ r is '' i �. �` h` �r ' l i�`'t x � _ -.i,' - .. '' , - . 4•t , axt r -5 �yki ° C'f�'? • 1 � to �4 t n' iyx� ! . # t b . t. • - . • - - ' , - - -. � - ':fi -r' rt+: tip`-�' ,,. J , � x^ �s �, �`�`; ' ea Es a' , R 5 tY. a+. , CA eP�i Y tp y .1ST! t4 , J i 'ti U i Atf�r .y((i1..A, i « Fr;,. 5 - ,. * •t��t'`°e' Vie.'' f �rj `k 1 s a! i