No preview available
8809 OLYMPIC VIEW DRiiiiiiiiiiiiii 12652 8809 OLYM P I C VIEW DR M TAX ACCOUNTIPARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): L1 S 000 C R COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: c&h--6 j," / DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver Ystudy Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #°S: 19710 -y(�Dalo - 507(0 ( d h DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: 0 PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED PERMITS (OTHER): f 9 /O'G36(Qul / N) /(0 -0Y 9� (ALfli), I99� Da�acSl� MWArAwAwiAr"A"WAIJ����ri�i�ii�i����iii� PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: I ail 1 q ! 10 SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: off- . q L3 SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: 197 SHORT PLAT FILE: ���-Pf1�U lb&J ���( LOT:_ BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DA' SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: _;69cl GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc Nl u r PLANNING DATA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL =STREETfLLEJ Name: J ay Lew j 5 Date: 0+ 1 l 0 I ?i 00:T- Site Address: $ $ O9 0J ympf G View Dy I• V-e- Plan Check #: BLD Project Description: 1,;�-e d✓D ow► 0.d d (fl an Reduced Site Plan Provided: ( ES NO) W-Tj j Zoning: P- S — v Map Page: +D 5' Corner Lot: (YES / l' J Flag Lot: (YES Critical Areas Determination #: L IZAr • y0 0 (D • 13 } CGJ j if ® Study Required Owl Gi l tc, p l a/v%-„ ❑ Waiver ��.v05i�n ha2a✓d area SEPA Determination: ® Exempt ( 4 S0 Cy dova d i V1 9 ❑ Needed (Requires: 1 Fee, 2 Environmental Checklist, and 3 APO List with notarized form). Re wired Setbacks. Street: 25 , Se: (C) , SW: b , Rear: y� , Actual Setbacks sts et: N 4(o s e: p SN e: N q-�- Rear. & ,y �J ❑ Detached Structures: rlOYte2. SVl,CRA5V� ® Rockeries: e)t j cjld h 9 . ® Fences/Trellises: e)(. 6VWk/3/1 ❑ Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation:/ YI,t✓t�' h �'e' A,4x- �1 ® Stairs/Deck: £X (* 4?0 h h 9 Parking Required: 'jam Parking Provided: 2 N I C, Lot Area: 0 • ,2, (p OLC.V-ec2(� , 3 2y`'� Lot Coverage: •�. Lot Coverage C�j9lv3 EP M a X I;OVfyag�� Calculations: 3 2 YA t 5 20 +� a d dC11 (Vi/Yl. 9Y662i2Height Datum Point: M }}- Datum Elevation: I DO.O Maximum Height: (-k! I g Actual Height: d �• ADU Created: (YES / re 1• ILjtLVi.QA S Vwwv) Subdivision: .t a 11o0% yQQIVI eW addl-fl Oyl -� (Dt 4 7 s7zc " oNi Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES Other . 9co 931A-Vfwa.ge Grade, B 9(0 +26' G= 90 D . 9 0 / 11 S6 ' M a)( et v6t-h Dyl Plan Review By: g,,e;w av� 0 PLANNING DATA STREET FILE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Name: Date: Site Address. Plan Check #: aco7 _ Project Description: ex' S•Vn, o� c'6c,,p w� .,ecD Reduced Site Plan Provided: YES NO) Zoning: Map Page: Corner Lot: (YES / ®0 Flag Lot: (YES NO Critical Areas Determination #:0RA-�PGbG—ox3-7- ;P11Study Required ---%,* )Aa-z s dAc-ea- ❑ Waiver SEPA Determination: E Exempt ❑ Needed (for 500 cubic yards of grading or site within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO List with notarized form Re wired Setbacks Street: � Side: � Side: O � Rear: CAI) 25 Actual Setbacks Street: Side: N6 ex Side Rear: ❑ Detached Structures: ❑ Rockeries: No �.e s�. o w� o �. ElFences/Trellises: P ❑ Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation: Stairs Deck: aectri own or, \acM8, huildinq Height Datum Point: Datum Elevation: 100 Maximum Height Allowed: /. ► Actual Height: I� Other Parking Required: Parking Provided: Lot Area: Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% roposed: 0 Lot Coverage Calculations: 0 ADU Created: (YES / 0® Subdivision: �— Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES / O Comments Plan Review By: Planning Data Form 04-11-06.doc Pr 1 o' «N e stew i interp maint nonco; or site ��'-apermit ig in this permit approval process shall be ted as allowing or permitting the ance of aril cpx :re-1tlY t2isting illegal, )rming or• unpenlI Pd building, structure rndition whi4;h W outside the scope of the pplication, regWrlless of :whether such structure Or condition is shown on the or drawing. Such ,building, structure or may ti the subject of a separate ent action." 53'-6k I 127'-10a' N Proposed Deck Teena Christel 8809 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98026-5320 ------------------------ Legal Description Talbot Seavlew Add Blk 000 D-00 - Lot 4 Parcel Tax ID-# 59450000040003 ------------------------ Permit Applicant Jerry Bergstrom Jerry's Home Repair & Remodel License No. JERRYHR967M9 Ph, 425-750-8899 Scale: V = 20' Zonk_ S — 1 Z Comer,_,Fla&_ ,.ack a uired Actual Front s SidesW/E - -- t 10 57fA A fro Rear Af 25- > ZT Other Height 2i c 2 RECEIVED S E P 2 8 2007 BUILDING DEPT. STREET FILE 'Nothing in this permit approval prose all be interpreted as allowing or petmi#M W maintenance of any currently ezistin illegal, nonconforming or unpermitted building, strudIftre or site condition which is outside the scope of the t application, regardless of whether such wilding, structure or condition is shown on the site plan or drawing. Such building, structure or condition may be the subject of a separate enforcement action. 16 Zone — CornerAIr.Flltg./_o Setback Regwred -- Front SidesEi Reara --._--- Other O Height y_---—'... N Ea ve g e -by no-% ex Sea 30 ►�c�r.cs I • 1. TO �_ro i pCISNJb C. Cl cc r- — — — I fLe-i301UJ �II�ST. �,�, ►JEV`I S7fLoc��Y1i-1� WALL6 / N vV3t:42_. ,L- H006C WILY ! I I I • 1 I 4& I I A•_ 1 �I I 1 � N I HOMEOWNER TEENACEMff L/JAYIXWf3 UW Olympic Yew Drive Edmond, WA 98026 TAISOT SHAVIEW ADDITION, LOT #4, SECTION 18, THOMAS ESTEP DESEGN TOMFS EP@adcom 220 Ylm Ave F49 SeMft WA 98112 206 320.9063 plane SWENSON SAY FAGET Gary MacKe=e, Pmmc 2124 Third AVCMIC, Suite 100 Seattle WA 98121 206 443.6212 phone PROJECT SCOPE Ei` LIwin—>ri5r. �N 1� Wkiccl LOT COVERAGE NG CHANGE TO ExmNG BIIIIDING FOOTPRINT UL \/KJQiU MAP Edl "'� STREET FILE NVED :!�L �1111' -1 w MAR 12 2007 C LNOF EDMONDS Mt /I7-1— �_A/JD • • Site Information (soils/ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Site Address/Location: Critical Areas Checklist vegetation) IN TPROMMIGM, DO Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): Is this site currently developed? t/yes; no. If yes; how issite developed? CA File No: CLA-a(,P-131 'I e"., J" &I L,/, Describe the general site topography. Checkl-h that apply. t less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site: Rolling: ,slopes on site generally- ess than,.15/0 (a vertical rise: of 10=feet .over a horizontal distance of 664eei): Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet i_ over, a Horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). --,Steep: grades of greater than30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over.a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).. :Other (please.. describe): Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth., Site' contains, areas of seasonal standing water: �� ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? t Site is imtite floodway 1n . L floodplain. of'a water -course: Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the',grounds".surface?- ;Flows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). Site is primarily: forested _� meadow ; shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: For City Staff Use Only 1. Plan Check Number;; if applicable? �(/A 2. Site is Zoned?. 3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? va - ICWmci l5� g��oeg 4. Critical Areas inventory, or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? 5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? No. DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER Reviewed bv-. ��:�'. �G� i— i�atP� 1 !1 / i 9lnr- • #rzu City. of Edmonds Development. Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on' this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application : for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed . to complete . the' Checklist .should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, 'or . soil surveys). CEnD6 b -0 i 3T Date Received: I NLo City Receipt #: 0 Critical Areas File #: 7-U%9 b1 Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00 . Date Mailed to Applicant: A property--,owner,.or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it; and submit it . to the City. The City will review the checklist, .make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent . steps necessary, to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the.signed copy of this form to assist City staff, in fording and locating the specific piece. of property: described on this .form. In addition, .the applicant. shall., include other pertinent information .(e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with'this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary, assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant; and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration. on the processing of. the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or partupon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees: By my signature, I certify that the information and xhibits herewith 'submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this app ' ti n on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE r �/ Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posattendant to this application. , SIGNATURE OF OWNER Owner/pplicant- Name. Street Address City State Zip Telephone: Email address (optional): DATE . Applicant Representa*e: Name U — ��, Street Ad e s City State Zip Telephone: (0(7:� `,2-p—q -C63 Email Address (optional): .Fb/tAj e1z)b u 0 M 10,O td rl, r- CITY OV E®MIONDS Call PRospeet 0-1107 when work CIVIC CENTER - WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT, is ready for inspection. (No Inspee, 0 .. tions Saturday, simdav or holidays.) N. 3599 SIDE SEWER PERMIT ADDRESS ................... 88.... l epic Vigw...Drive.....----------------•--•-----•-•-•-•--....................... --- • ---•.........-------- OwNER.............J_.__ Edward Nievaard CONTRACTOR........... Cascade.................. ... Sewers............................................... Permission is grantedKarCh .... .................... 19.7.q.., for .........-.............. days to REPAIR or CONNECT a side -sewer' With City Sewers in accordance with application on file and governing ordinances. ATTENTION IS CALLED,TO THE FOLLOWING: - 'N' No. 1—The owners'of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must be employed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected. Nu-E No. 2-Obtain full', information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing aide sewers when you get permit. NOTE No. 3—Top of side sewer: must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2q,. No bends in grade sharper than % will be permitted. NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street, must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for failure due to improper- work. which may develop within one year of completion. NOTE No. 5—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than Is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or Its appur- tenances except -to insert the -pipe into the wye.. . • CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORRS - 2PRM i ACTION REPORT Date: Time: .' 3 c• SUBJECT REQUESTOR: NAME: {�, jd, ADDRESS: PHONE: REQUEST RECEIVED BY: TELEPHONE c2n"- CONTACT IN OFFICE r--j RECEIVED BY: Rn11TF Tn- I N° 1613 SUSPENSE DATE: File N Attachments: /� =Yes ll�/ =No 7 1 7ace 0■�1. _ s . v ®�■ ■■ ©■ Mal r i■ am ■■ ©■ m■o■ ■■ UMMIMMMEMIMMum ■■■ ACTION: of P � / �� All Concerned Notified Action Completed/File STREET FILE CITY of EDMONDS --- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT f B Routing o uilding Permit Applications Proposed Property Address of Application: 8809 Olympic View Drive 3osl. D 6 yew_ DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE WATER S T R E E T SEWER NOTES - -- ��--v / -F/e?3 BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS ki USE PERMIT RvILDING DEP. pplicant Fill ZONE NUMBER AU G 2 3 1976' PERMIT APPLICATION de Heavy Lines JOB I ADDRESS ��_I,�(6� • }f t t'1v�/1�r. NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) �►- t Y LLL"' ;�',ap n� V 1 J VIEA LEGAL LOT LOT AR A SUBDIVISION NO. i\A El YES ❑ NO W MAILING ADDRESS �' \�) , �7 1 OR ADB NO. o� AA Pic , r. �G yo �1/�, V CONDRIANCE USE NO, CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER `' •� +>�•� "�� !7 1. PROPOSED YARDS - - HEIGHT Z N`AMEE FRONT SIDE. REAR Z F' - ALLOWABLE PROPOSED J a' U SIGN AREA SIGN AREA W F ADDRESS ' OTHER _ REQUIREMENTS U It CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER ¢ PLANNING DEPT. APPROVAL DATE NAME STREET R/W EXISTING STREET R/W FT. DEFICIENCY THIS PROPERTY Q ADDRESS f COMP, PLAN ST. R/W FT, FT. U i• ¢ REMARKS t% Z CITY - TELEPHONE NUMBER F Z - U STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER CHECKED BY W Z_ U STREET AND/OR UTILITY El YES W Legal Description of Property (Show or Attach Four Copies) ,Below L� WORK REQ'D El NO 1 UNDERGROUND.. ❑ YES Z WIRING REQ'D El NO ' 0 TA � )) V ��V L-13 � �( ��"' � `ti a TYPE CONNECTION VERIFIED BY m El YES PERMIT NUMBER W W W SEPTIC SYSTEM \ 0 APPVD BY CITY ENG, ❑ NO W J ¢ REMARKS V1 l7 W J METER SIZE SERVICE SIZE CLEARANCE. CHECKED BY W - F REMARKS¢ 3 D NEW RESIDENTIAL ❑ GAS LINE ' FIRE ZONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE ❑ NON-RESIDENTIAL SIGN ILL..I ADD RETAINING ❑ DEMOLISH Q WALL - SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED -OCCUPANCY GROUP LOAD ALTER EXCAVATE FENCE OR FILL ❑ ( x_FTI JAREA ❑ YES ❑ NO JOCCUPANT f w PLAN CHECKED By THIS SITE IS LOCATED I.N THE CITY REPAIR .04. �: PRE-MOYE PowoL SHOULD BEDCODS. ODC31 SALES TAX REMARKS - Z NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF 0 DWELLING UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE m . Qt tit PROPOSED USE VALUATION FEE - - Z - PLAN CHECK - O I L' NO, - aF• PLOT PLAN INDICATE BUILDING SETBACKS, i ABUTTING STREETS) BUILDING U m W PLUMBING " 0 m Q HEAT &"GAS LINE FENCE 1 SIGN RETAINING WALL SWIMMING POOL - I hereby acknowled¢e that I. have read- thle annllratinn• Ch..# she +.._ TOTAL AMOUNT Dt1E - - s n`�Y�'x; �, , - ��'�� r.����� r� _ ?'u� . �, � .+y�l`i�'�1'',ii'j�ig� � nx ����'��"'�"����'fY�3�`'�!'t�[�YV"��;�',�•,f�'i.fl' ,�;1���-, � , _n ., ., City of, Edmonds �om� RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number: - Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction:. 8809 Olympic View Dr. (9415628) 18 90 9 B. Type of Work (be specific): -�Install New Service C. Contractor: WashingbQn Natural Gas Company Contact: Frank Swan of Mailing Address: 815 Mercer St Seattle WA Phone: 224-2278 State License N: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit It (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑l City Project ® Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑i Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: t�JC► 'I',G, F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : faYes ❑No G. Size of Cut: 1(2 x 4) H. Charge $ In D/W of.8809 for Svc Tie —In APPLICANT TO READ ANZcoss, N INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hoy of Edmonds harmle�rorit j 2 maeses, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be madehe City of Edmonds, an is tments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defensnd attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PgRIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES -WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL Bt P"D P$qED FOR ISSUANCE f0kiJE�1P CANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be w NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE ,. Engrg. Div. 1991 I E Addendum to -cityof Edmonds .�Right of Way Permit Application -Submitted by: MITCHELL S. •LANKFORD Engineering Aide Washington Natural Gas 521=5246 n off F�2 1:/14V —6V winuvw ain depth unknown „ 21 gas main - Key: -w- water -g- gas -ss- sewer $ water hydrant O . water valve 315 'Acrccr S1. 0 '), 1'Z,a 18e9). Scut) WA S 9111 (206) 6:2.7767 REVISIOP FEB 01208 BUILDING DEPARTMENT C" OF EDMONDS -apa-70 v LIL-�-3za-- 34, 0 i A .6 OA F OF - CL U3 -Z 4, �ojt, 770,,L--, C��I risll-Jb -� zzz O co � � • ABLTIGHTLINE ACCEPT, ERWE MAT 50yi 35 acs 40 W-12 '6l)Y) Qb�-1 i, I 0 L-L Dear Sir/Madam; We have conducted a review of the revised foundation plan prepared by Swenson Say raget (Gary Mackenzie, PE -Structural Engineer); specifically, Plan Sheet S4 for the proposed master suite addition at the above referenced address. This revision involves the use of a 2-inch diameter steel pin pile and grade beam system instead of the conventional strip footings shown originally on Sheet S3. Pin piles driven into load bearing soils beneath the existing fill will provide a suitable foundation system that will preclude potential future settlement problems. We consider this foundation system to be suitable assuming the following recommendations and procedures: • 2-inch diameter pipe piles shall consist of extra strong, schedule 80 pipe. • The contractor's proposed materials, equipment and methods should be available for review by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to the commencement of work. • We recommend that the pin piles be driven as single non -spliced lengths. Where the driven length to refusal exceeds that of the individual section that is readily available or tensile or uplift forces are not operable, splices will be permitted. However, where splicing is performed, -it should be restricted to the lower 10-foot segment of the pile. Deformed or bent piles should not be driven. All piles should be inspected by HWA and approved prior to driving. • Continuous inspection of pin pile installation should be conducted by representatives of the Geotechnical Engineer, HWA GeoSciences, Inc., to confirm that sufficient driving resistance is achieved to ensure the design compression capacity of the piles. 19730.-. suit 200 Lynnwood,' 98Q36_957>;_ TeL4257:Z!�:0 06=` - ivww hwa'- "osccnces com. dr: _ "Sg — - is June 4, 2007 AA Project No. 2007-000, Task 500 Please contact us if you require any further information. Sincerely; MWA GeoSciences Inc. Steven E. Greene, L.G., L.E.G. Senior Engineering Geologist/Vice-President [XFIRES 03 / 2414e Lorne A. Balanko, P.E. President Jay Lewis-Geotech Review 2 HWA GeoSciences, Inc. HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. ��cF i��`:>k•ilt�lic�91 e`� 1'nri'!r�•nf li�r;lu�rriir�; • tti�•riris�rnh�;;r . (��������+i'rruri+�+ri�r�il l,;<p„-7i��u :� 7?.itin,q � � ��'� oEVFt0P CiryMOF EMoNOSS orR. February 8, 2007 HWA Project No. 2007-000-21, Task 5 Precision Construction Services; Inc. L126 Wl "A -venue. South Edmonds WA 98020 Attn: Mr. Jay Lewis Subject: GI';OTECHNICAL INATStIGATION Residential Addition 8809 Olympic View llrive Edmonds':VVashingtOi 9802E Dear Mr. Lewis: STREET FILE At your request, HWA GeoSciences Inc: `(HWA) has undertaken and completed a. geotechilical investigation withhin and beyond the footprint of the proposed residential addition at the. subject;she'at,8809` Olyiiipic View Drive; in Edmonds, Washingto�i. This inVestigation.l as been perfoiiiied in support of application'.requited.to obtain a building permit from the City of Edmonds for the proposed basemeni floor addition to the existing residence: For the purposes of this investigation HWA performed a review of tlrepertinent geologic neaps, conducted. a si e-reconnaissance to observe local topographic features,. excavated 3 shallow -hand borings, and conducted.3 DCP (Dropwe.ight Coiie,Penetrometer) somidings to delineate site soil conditions within the footprint.of the proposed addition. PROJECT LOCATION The subject:property consists of the developed portion of a.lot located within the NW Vi., Section 18, Township 27 N, and..Range 4 E; situated at municipal: address 89.09 Olyihpic View Dkive,.in Edmonds;. Washington (Snohonish Couuty.N0. 00594500000400). The approximate site location is depicted on Figure 1; the Project Site & Vicinity. Map.. Based upon the site.map provided by Thomas>J. Estep (Architect), the new addition will occupy .. . the area north of the existing garage and. east of the existing residential 19.i3R - 64 tli Avenue suiw Mb Structure, as shmvn on. Figure 2, the Site R' Exploration Plan Map: i_?nmioid 1VA 98036 ;957 Tel: 425:774M06:.'.' .. F ix 425;771:271 J." WAVY i cnces.coni` February 8, 2007 HWA Project No. 2007-000-21, Task 5 PROPOSED ADDITION As currently proposed, the basement floor addition will be attached to and extended along the east side of the existing residential structure north of the garage. The addition will consist of a basement level, concrete -walled, structure supported on a foundation system consisting of cast -in -place concrete strip footings. The proposed addition will be roughly 22 feet long and extend out from the existing residential structure about 16 feet, occupying approximately ±350 square feet according to the site map provided the Architect. SITE OBSERVATIONS The existing residential structure occupies approximately 1,477 square feet (roof coverage) in the south-central portion of an 11,230 square foot lot. Currently, a two car, 456-square foot, garage is attached along the southeast side of the house. When completed, the addition will occupy the area north of the garage, attaching to the northeast wall of the existing basement level. The house is set into a slope, which is moderately inclined to the southwest at about 15% or less in grade. A low rockery traverses the slope approximately 20 feet north from the existing house at its closest point. The position of this rockery suggests that it was installed to retain fill placed to level the back yard adjacent to the north side of the house. No ground water seeps or surface water erosion features were seen on site, and the existing house showed no apparent signs of settlement or foundation distress. There are no distinct signs of recent or past movement on the hill slope and the upper surface soils along the slope were found to be firm at shallow depth, when probed with a 3-foot long, '/z-inch diameter, steel T-handled bar. GEOLOGY The published geological map "Composite Geologic Map of the Sno-King Area", .prepared by Booth, et al, 2004, shows that the upper plateau north of Puget Drive is underlain by Advance Outwash. Advance Outwash deposits typically consist of dense to very dense, yellowish brown to gray, clean to silty, fine to coarse sand, but may contain gravelly layers at the top and silty layers near the base. Subsequent to deposition, this soil was over -ridden by the advancing glacial front and, therefore, is expected to exhibit low compressibility and very high shear strength. These soils transmit ground water freely and are prone to erosion when denuded of vegetation. SOILS According to the Soil Conservation Map for Snohomish County (MRCS, online web soil survey, 2007), the site is overlain by Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, on 8 to 15 percent 8809 Olympic View Drive. 2 HWA GeoSciences Inc. February 8, 2007 HWA Project No. 2007-000-21, Task 5 slopes. The Alderwood sandy loam soils formed on glacial till plains. The runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight for these soils. SITE EXPLORATION On January 22" d, 2007, an HWA geologist conducted a limited shallow hand -exploration program to evaluate near -surface conditions on the site. At that time, 3 hand borings were conducted to depths ranging from 2.5 to 6.2 feet, before refusing on coarse gravel or cobbles. Site soil conditions were noted at each of the hand boring locations, which were selected based on the location of proposed addition as shown on the Site Plan provided by the Architect. The approximate locations of our hand borings are shown on Figure 2, the Site & Exploration Plan Map. Hand boring logs were prepared from our observations, and are presented on Figures 5 through 7. A legend of the terms and symbols used on the exploration logs precedes them as Figure 4. For ease of interpretation of soil conditions on site, Figure 3 provides an inferred geologic cross- section through the proposed development and several of our borings. The stratigraphic contacts shown on the hand boring logs and the cross-section represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; actual transitions may be more gradual. The hand auger borings at the locations of HH-1, HH-2, were supplemented by utilizing a Dropweight Cone Penetrometer (DCP) to check relative soil density/strength conditions. The DCP consists of a steel extension shaft assembly, with a 60 degree hardened steel cone tip attached to one end, which is driven into the subsoil by means of a sliding drop hammer. The base diameter of the cone is 20mm. The diameter of the shaft is 8mm less than that of the cone to ensure that at shallow penetration depths the resistance to penetration is exerted on the cone alone. The DCP is driven by repeatedly dropping an 8 kg sliding hammer from a height of 575 mm. The depth of cone penetration was measured after each hammer drop and the soil shear strength is reported in terms of the DCP index. The DCP index is based on the average penetration depth resulting from 1 blow of the 8 kg hammer and is reported as millimeters per blow (mm/blow). The data obtained from the DCP tests was correlated to approximate Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) blows per foot, in order to evaluate the strength of the subgrade soils. The DCP data is plotted on the appropriate Hand Boring Logs in Appendix A. In addition, a third DCP sounding was conducted without an associated hand'auger boring, and is designated DCP-3 and is presented on Figure 8. SOIL PROFILE Typically, the near surface soils observed in the hand borings consisted of loose to medium dense fill soils overlying weathered and unweathered glacial outwash soils. The soil conditions are described briefly as follows: Topsoil: At the surface at the location of all the hand borings,. topsoil consisting of loose, dark brown, silty sand with gravel, containing abundant organic material, was encountered. The topsoil layer encountered ranged from 0.25 to 0.33 feet in thickness. 8809 Olympic View Drive. 3 1 HWA GeoSciences Inc. February 8, 2007 HWA Project No. 2007-000-21, Task 5 Fill: -Below the topsoil layer in all hand borings, and at the surface in DCP-3, fill was encountered, consisting of loose to medium dense, brown, silty sand with gravel, rootlets, woody debris and charcoal pieces. This soil unit was only fully penetrated in HH-2 where it was about 5.5 feet thick. The other hand borings were terminated due to refusal on coarse gravel or cobbles and did not fully penetrate the fill. At the location of DCP-3, native soil was encountered at an approximate depth of 9.5 below the existing ground surface. Apparently the fill thickens to the south along the alignment explored on site. Advance Outwash — Advance Outwash soils, consisting of dense, yellow brown, fine to medium sand with gravel was encountered below the fill at an approximate depth of 5.7 feet in HH-2. DCP refusal, presumably in dense native soils, occurred at a depth of 9.5 feet below the existing ground surface, in DCP-3. The thickness of this unit is unknown as it was too deep to fully penetrate with hand tools. We expect that the depth to dense sand increases somewhat from north to south due to the amount of filling required to level those areas near the adjacent property to the east and the on -site garage. GROUND WATER Ground water seepage was not observed in any of the hand borings. However, it is anticipated that ground water conditions will vary depending on the season, variation in local subsurface conditions, and other factors. During wet season periods, it is possible that ground water may become perched on the surface of the low permeability deposits at other locations of this site. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS In accordance with the criteria contained in the City of Edmonds Code, Title 23-Natural Resources; Chapter 23.80 — Geologically Hazardous Areas, the subject site is not within an area designated as a potential erosion or landslide/steep slope or seismic hazard. The existing native soils consist of soils that were indirectly glacially consolidated, and are dense. Present site development plans do not include any modification of the steep slope portion of the existing hillslope, and will not extend significantly beyond the present footprint to the north. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General In summary, the soil conditions within the portion of the site proposed for the addition consist of dense, granular, glacial outwash soils, overlain by loose to medium dense fill and topsoil layers at least 5 to 9 feet thick. The actual depth to dense, native, sands at other locations within the footprint of the addition will need to be verified in the field 8809 Olympic View Drive. 4 HWA GeoSciences Inc. February 8, 2007 HWA Project No. 2007-000-21, Task 5 during construction. In our opinion, the dense native sand will provide adequate bearing for the residential foundation system. Excavation and Temporary Shoring Requirements Preparation for construction of conventional foundations will require the excavation and removal of all undocumented fill beneath proposed footing and slab areas. Based on the results of our investigation, these excavations will be at least 5 feet deep or greater and require lay backs and/or shoring to protect workers and existing structures in accordance with Part N of WAC (Washington Administrative Code) 296-155. The fill materials at the site classify as Type C soil. Unsupported excavations in Type C soils must be inclined no steeper than 1 M: IV (horizontal to vertical). Flatter slopes may be required where ground water seepage occurs. We expect shoring will be required along the east side of the excavation to protect the adjacent property and underpinning on the south to protect the existing garage foundation. Temporary slopes should be protected fiom erosion, as necessary, by covering the cut face with well -anchored plastic sheets. Maintenance of safe working conditions, including temporary excavation stability, is the responsibility of the contractor. Based on the soil conditions observed in our explorations, we anticipate that the on -site soils can be excavated with conventional equipment such as backhoes and loaders. Foundations Design Considerations: The proposed structure may be supported on footings bearing directly on dense native soils, or either properly compacted structural fill consisting of compacted crushed rock base course, meeting the requirements specified in WSDOT Standard Specification Section 9-03.9(3), or controlled density fill (CDF; 1-sack concrete mix) placed over dense native soils. The advantage of using CDF backfill is that once excavations are made to bearing soils, backfilling can occur immediately, with minimal shoring and no workers in open excavations or trenches with steep back slopes. The recommended compaction level for crushed rock base course placed under footing and slab levels is 95% Modified Proctor maximum dry density (per ASTM D1557). Exterior strip footings bearing on native dense sand may be proportioned for an allowable bearing pressure of 3, 000 psf. This may be increased by 1/3 for short-term loads such as wind and seismic effects. Exterior footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade, and interior footings should be founded at least 12 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade. We recommend strip footings be a minimum of 18 inches wide and interior spread footings be a minimum of 24 inches in the smallest dimension — these recommendations may govern footing design. Alternatively, if excavation of the existing fill is not desired, then the structure could be founded on a pin pile (small diameter steel pipe pile) and grade beam foundation system - that would transfer wall loads directly to bearing soils and support the slab should the fill settle in the future. 8809 Olympic View Drive. 5 HWA GeoSciences Inc. February 8, 2007 HWA Project No. 2007-000-21, Task 5 Construction Considerations: Footing excavations should be trimmed neat and the excavation bottoms should be carefully prepared in order to minimize the amount of over -excavation required. The ground surface where structural fill, foundations, or slabs are to be placed should be proof -rolled, or suitably probed. This procedure will help determine the presence and approximate extent of any soft or unstable areas. Proof - rolling or probing should be performed under full-time observation of an HWA representative. Any soils that cannot be adequately recompacted should be over - excavated and the unsuitable materials removed and replaced with compacted structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base. Over -excavation and compaction of the structural fill should extend outward from the edge of the footing a lateral distance of at least two feet. We recommend that HWA be retained to observe footing excavations, and placement and compaction of structural fill prior to pouring concrete. Assuming construction is performed as recommended herein, we estimate that the total and differential settlements for foundations will be less than 1-inch and %s -inch, respectively. An important component of ensuring stability of the on -site slopes is the provision of adequate surface and subsurface drainage to prevent water buildup in the slope deposits. To help facilitate this, footing drains should be installed around the perimeter of all exterior foundation walls and tied into an appropriate offsite disposal system. Seismic Considerations Should it be necessary for a development of this type to design for seismic conditions, we anticipate that the new structure would be designed in accordance with the 2003 International Building Code (IBC) standards. In this regard, for seismic design, the site is considered Site Class C, as described in Section 4 615.1 of the 2003 IBC. For the site location, the design maximum considered spectral response acceleration at short, periods, Ss, is 1.26g. The design maximum considered spectral response acceleration 1 second period, Si, is 0.43g. Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon wherein loose, saturated, granular deposits temporarily lose strength and behave as a liquid in response to earthquake shaking. Based on our observation of relatively dense material at or close to the base of the hand borings and the apparent absence of regional ground water at shallow depths, we consider the potential for seismic liquefaction on the site to be negligible. Hence, seismically induced liquefaction instability is not considered to be an issue for this site. Erosion Control during Construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) as described in City of Edmonds Code must be followed. These measures include an erosion control plan that addresses, limiting activity during wet periods, placement of a silt retention system on the eastern side of the 8809 Olympic View Drive. 6 HWA GeoSciences Inc. February 8, 2007 HWA Project No. 2007-000-21, Task 5 property, and proper disposal or recompaction of any material that is disturbed on the site. CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS We have prepared this letter report for Precision Construction, Inc., and the property owner Mr. Jay Lewis, for use in construction and permitting of the proposed basement addition on the subject lot. Experience has shown that soil and ground water conditions can vary significantly over small distances. Inconsistent conditions can occur between explorations and may not be detected by a geotechnical study. The scope of work did not include environmental assessments or evaluations regarding the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous substances in the soil, surface water, or ground water at this site. HWA does not practice or consult in the field of safety engineering. We do not direct the contractor's operations and we cannot be responsible for the safety of personnel other than our own on the site; the safety of others is the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor should notify the owner if any of the recommended actions presented herein are considered unsafe. O.O We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at (425) 774-0106. Sincerely, HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. Steven E. Greene, L.E.G. Vice President/Senior Engineering Geologist 8809 Olympic View Drive. 7 HWA GeoSciences Inc. February 8, 2007 HWA Project No. 2007-000-21, Task 5 Attachments: Figure 1: Project Site Location and Vicinity Map Figure 2: Site Plan & Proposed Addition Location Figure 3: Geologic Cross -Section A -A' Figure 4: Legend of Symbols and Terms Figure 5: Log of HH-1 Figure 6: Log of HH-2 Figure 7 Log of HH-3 Figure 8 Log of DCP-3 REFERENCES Booth, D.B, Cox, B.F., Troost, K.G., a S. A. Shimel, 2004, Composite Geologic Map of the Sno-King Area, University of Washington, Seattle Area Geologic Mapping Project. City of Edmonds, 2000, Title 23-Natural Resources; Chapter 23.80 — Geologically Hazardous Areas. International Code Council (ICC), 2003 International Building Code. NRCS, 1983, Soils Map of Snohomish County Area, WA661 (on-line version) WSDOT, 2004, Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, M 41-10. 8809 Olympic View Drive. 8 I-IWA GeoSciences Inc. 1N MN p011[tl 0 'YA 1000N[tms /I8' V Priat.d fromTOP0102701 HUiordOa�yNc Holdotp (aw.lopomud & VICINITY MAP SOILS INVESTIGATION F.OR`RESIDENTIAL ADDITION �T 8805 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE U HWAGEOSCIENCES'INC• EDMONDS; WASHINGTON L FIGURE NO: 2007-000, T5 L ] • H A.P HH-3 HH-2 j3 C011WAII ,p Approximate location and extent of proposed Addition. North Key: Base Map provided by Client. Not to Scale. Designations: 4HH-3 Exploration location. FIGURE NO. SOILS INVESTIGATION FOR RESIDENTIAL ADDITION PROJECT NO. I HWAGEOSCIENCES INC. 8809 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 2007-O0o, T5 :.......'.... M ;. w ... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Ir ....... j : M Z O o W M r.? C/] 11 P� to U z •� U � A U to O kn o N N --" .-. (T) NOI.LVAa I3 •3 z rn Z 0 0 0 a a U pro R. Win lil N �>� O OCO g0 U 00 F 0 0 j ��w w w t7 > z rn 0 (A • R1=1 ATIVF DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY VERSUS SPT N-VALUE COHESIONLESS SOILS COHESIVE SOILS Approximate DensityN (blowwsm) Approximate Relative Density(%) Consistency N (blows/tq Undralned Shear Strength e Very Loose 0 to 4 0 - 15 Very Soil 0 to 2 <250 Loose 4 to 10 15 - 35 Soft 2 to 4 250 - 500 Medium Dense 10 to 30 36 - 65 Medium Stiff 4 to 8 500 - 1000 Dense 30 to 50 65 85 Stiff 8 to 15 1000 - 2000 Very Dense over 50 85 100 Very Suit 15 to 30 2000 - 4000 Hard over 30 1 >4000 I Icr'.t; cnu rl ASSIFiCATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP DESCRIPTIONS Gravel and Gravel •'I GW Wes -graded GRAVEL Coarse Clean o Q GP Poody-graded GRAVEL Grained Gravely sous (Bills or no Ones) Sops More than Gravel with GM Silly GRAVEL 50% of Coarse a Fraction Retained Fines (appretlable amount of Ones) GC Clayey GRAVEL on No. 4 Slave �• SW Well -graded SAND Sand and Clean Sand .• SP poorly SAND More than Sandy Sops (little or no fines) 50%Retained on No. 60%or More Sand with '•': SM Slily SAND 200 Steve of Coarse Fines (appreciable Size Fracton Passing amount of fines) SC Clayey SAND No. 4 Sieve ML SiLT Fine Grained SRI Liquid Undt and CL Lean CLAY SOBS Less than 60% Clay OL organic SILT/0rgentc CLAY Mil Elastic SILT 60%More SIR I" Limit and CH Fat CLAY Passing Pas in g or More 50% Clay No. 200 Slave OH Organic SILT/Organ CLAY Size Nighty Organic SOBS �r PT PEAT r r COMPONENT DEFINITIONS COMPONENT SIZE RANGE Boulders Larger than 121n Cobbles 3 in to 12In Gravel 3 in to No 4 (4.6mm) Coarse gravel 3 in to 3/4 In Fine gravel 314 In to No 4 (4.6mm) Sand No. 4 (4.5 mm) to No. 200 (0.074 mm) Coarse sand No. 4 (4.5 mm) to No. 10 (2.0 mm) Medium send No. 10 (2.0 mm) to No. 40 (0.42 mm) Fine sand No. 40 (0.42 mm) to No. 200 (0.074 mm) Slt and Clay Smaller than No. 200 (0.074mm) TEST SYMBOLS %F Percent Fines AL Atterberg Limits: PL o Plastic Limit LL - Liquid Limit CBR California Bearing Ratio CM Consolidation DO Dry Density (pcf) DS Direct Shear GS Grain Size Distribution K Permeability MD MolsturelDensily Relationship (Proctor) MR Resilient Modulus PID Photolonlzation Device Reading Pp Pocket Penetrometer Approx. Compressive Strength (ISO SG Specific Gravity TC Triaxlal Compression TV Totvane Approx. Shear Strength (tsf) UC Unconfined Compression SAMPLE TYPE SYMBOLS ®2.0" OD Spilt Spoon (SPT) (140 lb. hammer with 30 In. drop) IShelby Tube a3.1i4" OD Split Spoon with Brass Rings OSmall Bag Sample Large Bag (Bulk) Sample Core Run Non-standard Penetration Test (3.0" OD split spoon) GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS $Z Groundwater Level (measured at time of drilling) t Groundwater Level (measured In well or open hole after water level stabilized) COMPONENT PROPORTIONS PROPORTION RANGE DESCRIPTIVE TERMS < 6% Cleari 6 -12% Slightly (Clayey, Silty, Sandy) 12.30% Clayey, Silty, Sandy, Gravelly 30 - 60% Very (Clayey, Silty, Sandy, Gravelly) Components are arranged In order of Increasing quantities. NOTES: Soil classifications presented on exploration logs are based on visual and laboratory observation. MOISTURE CONTENT Soil descriptions are presented in the following general order. Density/consfsfency, color, modsorof any) GROUP NAME, additions to group name (if any), moisture DRY Absence of moisture, dusty. content. Pmporflon, gredstkn, and angularity or constituents, additional comments. dry to the touch. (GEOLOGIC INTERPRETATION) MOIST Damp but no visible water. WET Visible tree water, usually Please refer to the discussion In the report text as well as the exploration logs for a more Sol Is below water table. complete description of subsurrsce conditions. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION LEGEND OF TERMS AND goo RESIDENTIAL ADDITION SYMBOLS USED ON fnirr-8809 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE EXPLORATION LOGS HWAGEOSCIENCESINC. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98026 q PROJECT NO.: 2007-000-21-tOO$IGURE- — • DRILLING COMPANY: HWA Geosolences Inc. SURFACE ELEVATION: * feet DATE STARTED: 01/22/2007 DRILLING METHOD: Hand Bucket Auger DATE COMPLETED: 01/22/2007 SAMPLING METHOD: Grab LOGGED BY: D. Coltrane LOCATION: See Figure 2 ♦ Non -Standard Penetration Resistance ( Brows per foot ) (17.5lb. weight 22(" drop) W W V K V Z !� Jw p N ~ z = a a] h D d W _ " c � j DESCRIPTION ° 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 0 SM Loose, brown, slily SAND with gravel, organic material and A ' SM rootlets, mo1sL SOIL Loose to medium dense, brown to light brown, silty SAND with gravel, burnt wood bits, organic debris and rootlets, moist. S-1 [FILL] O 1 1: :♦ 1 Hand Hole was terminated due to refusal on a cobble a12.5 &. feet below ground surface, no groundwater seepage was encountered during this exploration. A; yy 5 5 10 10 0 20 40 00 s0 100 Water Content (%) Plastic Limit I— 0--i Liquid Limit Natural Water Content NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions applies only at the specified location and on the date indicated and therefore may not necessarily be Indicative of other times and/or locations. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BORING: RESIDENTIAL ADDITION HH-1 8809 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE PAGE: 1 of 1 HWAGEOSCIENCES INC. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98026 2007-000-21400%iGURE 5 PROJECT NO' DRILLING COMPANY: HWA Geosclences Inc. SURFACE ELEVATION: i feel DATE STARTED: 01122/2007 DRILLING METHOD: Hand Bucket Auger DATE COMPLETED: 01/2212007 SAMPLING METHOD: Grab LOGGED BY: D. Coltrane LOCATION: See Figure 2 ♦ Non -Standard Penetration Resistance ( Blows Der tool ) (W.6lb. welahl, 22.6' drop) J 4 x �p U LUIG 0 � DESCRIPTION 0 AL Loose, brown, slily SAND with gravel, organic material and • SM rootlets, moist. O SO Loose to medium dense, brown to light brown, silty SAND with gravel, burnt wood bits, organic debris and rootlets, moist. [FILL] 5 SP I Dense, light brown, SAND wgh gravel and trace 911L moist. Hand Hale was terminated due to refusal on a cobble at 6.2 feet below ground surface, no groundwater seepage was encountered during this exploration. 10 W co a W to Z in o a a w oCO A 0 S-2 0 S-3 NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions applies only at the specified location and on the date indicated and therefore may not necessarily be indicative of other times and/or locations. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BOA RESIDENTIAL ADDITION 8809 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE MAGEOSCIENCESINC EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98026 i W t0 20 30 40 50 a 20 40 60 ou lu' Water Content N Plastic Limit I--.-i Liquid Limit Natural Water Content BORING: HH-2 PAGE: 1 of i 14005:IGURE: 6 10 rI LING COMPANY: HWAGaosclences Inc. SURFACE ELEVATION: i feet DATE STARTED: 01/22/2007 LLING METHOD: HandBucketAuger DATE COMPLETED: 01/22/2007 PLING METHOD: Grob LOGGED BY: D. Coltrane LOCATION: See Figure 2 ♦ NonSlendard Penetration Resistance (Blows per toot ) N7.e Ib. welaht. 22.6° drop) J 0 J N - :) DESCRIPTION 0 :. SM Loose, brown, slily SAND with gravel, organic material and rootlets, moist SM Loose to medium dense, brown to light brown, silly SAND with gravel, burnt wood bits, organic debris and rootlets, molst. (FILL] Large cobble encountered at 2.0 feet BGS Fill becomes grayish brown at 3.3 feet BGS. Hand Hole was terminated due to refusal on a cobble at 3.7 feet below ground surface, no groundwater seepage was encountered during this exploration. 5 10 ui ui ui Z K CL o rn fi h Z a s +�+ a O O � a n i t w 10 20 30 40 50 0 -0 I-10 20 40 s0 80 100 Water Content t'96) Plastic Limit 1-- 0— i Liquid Limit Natural Water Content NOTE: This log of subsurface condiliDns applies only at the specified location and on the date indicated end therefore may not necessarily be Indicative of other times and/or locations GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BORING: RESIDENTIAL ADDITION HH-3 8809 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE PAGE: 1 of 1 HWAGEOSCIENCHINC. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98026-1—,,, )nm_nnn_ r LING COMPANY: HWAGeosciences Ina SURFACE ELEVATION: LING METHOD: Dynamic Cone Penetrometer PLING METHOD: NA i ncATinN• Rea Flaure 2 DESCRIPTION Exploration was terminated at 9.5 feet due to refusal on dense native sand. i feet DATE STARTED: 01/22/2007 DATE COMPLETED: 01122/2007 LOGGED BY: D. Coltrane ♦ Non -Standard Penetration Resistance ( Blows per toot ) (17.6 h weight, 220 drop) w U W y Z_ Q h 1A � a a a w z O w 0 10 20 30 40 so -0 I— 10 20 40 60 80 100 Water Content (%) Plastic Limit 1--0--I Liquid Limit Natural Water Content LNOTE: This log of subsurface conditions applies only at the specified location and on the date Indicated and therefore may not necessarily be indicative of other times and/or locations GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BORING: RESIDENTIAL ADDITION DCP-3 8809 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE PAGE: 1 of 1 HWAGEOSCIENCH INC. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98026 g PROAFCT NO.: 200 / -000-2 1 400.�'augE• ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE 2003 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING & RESIDENTIAL CODE ( IBC & MC ) AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS, OSHA, NATIONAL FIRE CODE (NFC) AND ALL OTHER CODES WHERE APPLICABLE . DRAWINGS: VERIFY ALL EXISTING - SITE DMNSIONS AND PLAN DIMENSIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK. REPORT ANY VARIANCE OR DISCREPANCY TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE BEGINNING WORK! DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE, OR TO FACE, OR TO CENTERLINE OF STUD, OR TO GRID LINE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE WORD "SIMILAR" OCCURS ON THE DRAWINGS, IT SHALL BE USED IN ITS GENERAL SENSE AND . NOT IDENTICAL, AND ALL DETAILS SHALL BE WORKED OUT IN TEIEIR RELATION TO THEIR LOCATION AND CONNECTION TO OTHER PARTS OF THE WORK. WHERE A PORTION OF THE WORK IS. DRAWN OUT AND EXTENDED BY OUTLINE, THAT PART SHALL DENOTE SIMILAR WORK, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (UNO). ALL QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND MEANING OF DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE DECIDED UPON BY THE ARCHITECT OR IN THE CASE OF THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, THE ENGINEER. DIMENSIONS FOR WORK SHALL NOT BE, DETERMINED BY SCALE OR RULE, BUT BY FIGURED DIMENSIONS WHICH SHALL BE FOLLOWED AT ALL TIMES. IF FIGURED DIMENSIONS ARE LACKING ON THE DRAWINGS, THE ARCHITECT SHALL SUPPLY THEM BY REQUEST. IN THE CASE OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SMALL AND LARGER SCALE DRAWINGS, THE LARGER DRAWING SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. SHOP DRAWINGS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS, CATALOGUE INFORMATION, ILLUSTRATIONS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC., UPON REQUEST OF THE ARCHITECT FOR VERIFICATION OF THE DESIGN INTENT, FIELD MEASUREMENTS, ' AND CONFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL INDEMMIFY THE .ARCHITECT FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH WORK. MECH. & ELEC ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ALL PERTINENT CODES AND REGULATIONS OF MUNICIPALITY, COUNTY, AND STATE AUTHORITIES, THE NATIONAL BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITERS, THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, UNIFORM BUILDING CODE,. AND OTHER REGULATORY BODIES WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK, REINSTATEMENT: RESTORATION OR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF WARRANTED WORK HAS NO IMPACT ON NOR DOES IT DEPRIVE THE OWNER OF ACTIONS, RIGHT AND REMEDIES OTHERWISE AVAILABLE .FOR THE CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO FULFIL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT CONCIDENTIAL. PRODUCT WARRANTIES CONSIDERED TO BE CONFLICTING WITH OR DETRACTING FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CLEAN EACH ELEMENT OFF THE WORK AT THE TRYIE .OF INSTALLATION. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE FREEDOM FROM -DAMAGE AND ALLOWING FOR ONGOING ACTIVITIES UNTIL TIME OF COMPLETION. GENERAL LIMITATIONS: WHERE POSSIBLE, PROVIDE ENTIRE REQUIRED QUANTITY OF EACH GENERIC PRODUCT, MATERIAL, OR EQUIPMENT FROM A SINGLE SOURCE; AND WHERE NOT POSSIBLE TO DO SO, MATCH SEPARATE PROCUREMENTS AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE. TO EXTENT SELECTION PROCESS IS UNDER CONTRACTORS CONTROL, PROVIDE COMPAATIBLE PRODUCTS, MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT. WHERE AVAILABLE AND COMPLYING WITH REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDE STANDARD PRODUCTS WHICH HAVE BEEN USED PREVIOUSLY AND SUCESSFULLY IN SIMILAR APPLICATIONS, AND WHICH ARE RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURERS FOR THE APPLICATIONS INDICATED. - PRODUCT SELECTION: COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING FOR THE SELECTION AND HANDLING OF PRODUCTS, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT. SINGLE PRODUCT NAMED; PROVIDE ONLY THAT PRODUCT, UNLESS DETERMINED TO BE UNAVAILABLE, NON -COMPATIBLE WITH THE WORK, OR NON- COMPLYING WITH REQUIREMENTS OR GOVERNING REGULATIONS. TWO OR MORE PRODUCTS NAMED: SELECTION FROM NAMED PRODUCTS. IS CONTRACTORS OPTION, PROVIDED SELECTION COMPLIES WITH REQUIREMENTS. "OR EQUAL" NAMED; PROVIDED NAMED PRODUCT THAT COMPLIES WITH REQUIREMENTS, OR GAIN APPROVAL FROM ARCHITECT TO SELECT AND ' USE UNNAMED PRODUCT. SUBSTITUTIONS: REQUESTS. BY CONTRACTOR WILL BE CONSIDERED WHEN REASONABLE, TIMELY, AND FULLY DOCUMENTED AND QUALIFYING IN TERMS OF SUITABILITY. PRODUCT HANDLING: RECEIVE, STORE, AND HANDLE PRODUCTS, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT IN A MANNER WHICH WILL PREVENT LOSS, DETERIORATION AND DAMAGE. SCHEDULE DELIVERIES AND WORK TO MMM= LONG-TERM STORAGE AT PROJECT SITE AND SO AS TO REDUCE THE INCONVIENCE TO ALL OTHER CONTRACTORS AND SURROUNDING BUSINESS ACTIVITIES. ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BEAR THE STAMPS OR SEALS OF NBFU, ASME, AMCA, NEMA AND AIEE. ANY OF THE WORK NOT SUBJECT TO THE ABOVE SHALL BE GOB BY THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE OVERALL NATIONAL FIRE CODE (NFPA). ALL INSTALLATION, PROCEDURES, METHODS, & . CONDITIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS OF THE FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA)-, Z How pp�Uo� UU p O ►.� r W . ¢�U oW r'a Z�vv�� � o @0�PG aHO� Wes°Q. Qrr'�aLr:�O�Ea"'i�U•'"aUaxUoAWEaa z� 0o OVa pHs w 44 94 O o>.q , k0F. WQ� >�aoW + Q�z00z-A C? oW UQ �� u U o0a U R9 - 00 a c14 �� �xa<C �Ot� s�0 sa�Ut�pc0 a o a � o t� x a A a • x t3 A Nf), G /.eey Zone 5 ► ?' Corner,,,— PIa Setbacks Rec(uired Actual Front 5 2 13 ^` 1' Sides 1✓IV4 10 I o / ^' LF-7- Rear N (V v Other He: t i APPROVED BY PLANNING VMVN'� 04 •1y3- 0:�- Lj "am I= � � � ■M�t��� A!tip;Y` u& ^A P-'^.3,7/k4'.tY�Ew7:tveys.vaA�`"�n°�!'!b -M Nzw Jj� , ppjE�•�'I(� r J6 Y, VNER/CONTHACTOR IS APR 16 2007 EUILDINQ DEPARTRAET CITY OF ED(4gflNDPA HOME OWNER TEENA CHRISTEL / JAY LEWIS 8809 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98026 TAX PARCEL ID NUMBER 00594500000400 LEGAL DESCRIPTION TALBOT SEAVIEW ADDITION, LOT #4, SECTION 18, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN & DRAWINGS THOMAS ESTEP DESIGN TOMESTEP@aol.com 220 270' Ave East Seattle, WA 98112 206 320.9063 phone STRUCTURAL ENGINEER- SWENSON SAY FAGET Gary MacKenzie, Partner 2124 Third Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, WA. 98121 206 443.6212 phone PROJECT SCOPE \ACA W1 ITV MAP I Edmonds area, Washington, United States Z C� .Q M n w 00 v, Ll J .p � to a a .Z w 0 0 tj � a w � (2 .wE� � w Q w d � . 0co t � � 24 HR. NOTICE REQ. FOR INSPECTION%Z� vt M H U- LOT- JIG(E 513 _ oo _ � 61 ALL l� ft I t3q r- 4-m 2F/kL aR�'�.._ Date , . Scale ile Drawn TJE Job 06"Thr"EET FILE Shset 4e:4/(,? V AS NO .., A GINEERI G -5 r. raw ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE 2003 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING & RESIDENTIAL CODE ( IBC & IRC ) AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS, OSHA, NATIONAL FIRE CODE (NFC) AND ALL OTHER CODES WHERE APPLICABLE . DRAWINGS: VERIFY ALL EXISTING -SITE DIMENSIONS AND PLAN DIMENSIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK. REPORT ANY VARIANCE OR DISCREPANCY TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE BEGINNING WORK! DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE, OR TO FACE, OR TO CENTERLINE OF STUD, OR TO GRID LINE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WHERE THE WORD "SD IILAR" OCCURS ON THE DRAWINGS, IT SHALL BE USED IN ITS GENERAL SENSE AND NOT IDENTICAL, AND ALL DETAILS SHALL BE WORKED OUT IN THEIR RELATION TO THEIR LOCATION AND CONNECTION TO OTHER PARTS OF THE WORK. WHERE A PORTION OF THE WORK IS. DRAWN OUT AND EXTENDED BY OUTLINE, THAT PART SHALL DENOTE SIMILAR WORK, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (UNO). ALL QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND MEANING OF DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE DECIDED UPON BY THE ARCHITECT OR IN THE CASE OF THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, THE ENGINEER. DIMENSIONS FOR WORK SHALL NOT BE DETERMINED BY SCALE OR RULE, BUT BY FIGURED DIMENSIONS WHICH SHALL BE FOLLOWED AT ALL TIMES. IF FIGURED DIMENSIONS ARE LACKING ON THE DRAWINGS, THE ARCHITECT SHALL SUPPLY TEEM BY REQUEST. IN THE CASE OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SMALL AND LARGER SCALE DRAWINGS, THE LARGER DRAWING SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. SHOP DRAWINGS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS, CATALOGUE INFORMATION, ILLUSTRATIONS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC., UPON REQUEST OF THE ARCHITECT FOR VERIFICATION OF THE DESIGN INIENT, FIELD MEASUREMENTS, AND CONFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL INDEMMIFY THE ARCHITECT FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH WORK. MECH. & ELEC ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ALL PERTINENT CODES AND REGULATIONS OF MUNICIPALITY, COUNTY, AND STATE AUTHORITIES, THE NATIONAL BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITERS, THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, AND OTHER REGULATORY BODIES WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK. - REINSTATEMENT: RESTORATION OR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF WARRANTED WORK HAS NO IMPACT ON NOR DOES IT DEPRIVE THE OWNER OF ACTIONS, RIGHT .AND REMEDIES OTHERWISE AVAILABLE .FOR THE CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO FULFIL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT CONCIDENTIAL PRODUCT WARRANTIES CONSIDERED TO BE CONFLICTING WITH OR DETRACTING FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. -- - -- - - CLEAN EACH ELEMENT OFF —THE WORK AT THE TRVIE-OF INSTALLATION.-- -- PROVIDE SUFFICIENT MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE FREEDOM FROM DAMAGE AND ALLOWING FOR ONGOING ACTIVITIES UNTIL TIME OF COMPLETION. GENERAL LIMITATIONS: WHERE POSSIBLE, PROVIDE ENTIRE REQUIRED QUANTITY OF EACH GENERIC PRODUCT, MATERIAL, OR EQUIPMENT FROM A SINGLE SOURCE; AND WHERE NOT POSSIBLE TO DO SO, MATCH SEPARATE PROCUREMENTS AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE. TO EXTENT SELECTION PROCESS IS UNDER CONTRACTORS CONTROL, PROVIDE COMPAATIBLE PRODUCTS, MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT. WI�]ERE AVAILABLE AND COMPLYING WITH REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDE STANDARD PRODUCTS WHICH HAVE BEEN USED PREVIOUSLY AND SUCESSFULLY IN SIMILAR APPLICATIONS, AND WHICH ARE RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURERS FOR THE APPLICATIONS INDICATED: PRODUCT SELECTION: COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING FOR THE SELECTION AND HANDLING OF PRODUCTS, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT. SINGLE PRODUCT NAMED; PROVIDE ONLY THAT PRODUCT, UNLESS DETERMINED TO BE UNAVAILABLE, NON -COMPATIBLE WITH THE WORK, OR NON- COMPLYING WITH REQUIREMENTS OR GOVERNING REGULATIONS. TWO OR MORE PRODUCTS NAMED: SELECTION FROM NAMED PRODUCTS . IS CONTRACTORS OPTION, PROVIDED SELECTION COMPLIES WITH REQUIREMENTS. "OR EQUAL" NAMED: PROVIDED NAMED PRODUCT THAT COMPLIES WITH REQUIREMENTS, OR GAIN APPROVAL FROM ARCHITECT TO SELECT AND 'USE UNNAMED PRODUCT. SUBSTITUTIONS; REQUESTS BY CONTRACTOR WILL BE CONSIDERED WHEN REASONABLE, TIMELY, AND FULLY DOCUMENTED AND QUALIFYING IN TERMS OF SUITABILITY. PRODUCT HANDLING: RECEIVE, STORE, AND HANDLE PRODUCTS, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT IN A MANNER WHICH WILL PREVENT LOSS, DETERIORATION AND DAMAGE. SCHEDULE DELIVERIES AND WORK TO MIMIMIZE LONG-TERM STORAGE. AT PROJECT SITE AND SO AS TO REDUCE THE INCONVIENCE TO ALL OTHER CONTRACTORS AND SURROUNDING BUSINESS ACTIVITIES. ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BEAR THE STAMPS OR SEALS OF NBFU, ASME, AMCA, NEMA. AND AIEE. ANY OF THE WORK NOT SUBJECT TO THE ABOVE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE OVERALL NATIONAL FIRE CODE (HI'p'A)• ALL INSTALLATION, .PROCEDURES, METHODS, & . CONDITIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS OF THE FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA). O� �C7W as. 62490, O" �7,� �UgOU�ip/ �UU�r� @�x o�OoNo r `�0 In ;, oOa40 v i 0 W-4 az P. Wo"a oQ 0 01O UDW w Q�mwW 004 "<O¢uoo C4 ZOow > 0 41 * JA 05 wa a� Ad �in oAtt U ooOa a OO 0 c� W a4aa a�Q f� >4 " 6 zeM W W O"a� 0� U �Eij O a � � a O � � r x � Q x � ki . _ f,a(Z. CR!fi �:A.'! tinJW,.�wAYn!!$M,Y> � •xj}SY ^.iw••1A17'•�4T.a•O:lOgrWi co 0 I------1- "�: k WALL, AZ G i fl ~"� H 6C y I4 I N \/,,AL VAv i , .._._..,.._.... ........r.-.� �� HOME OWNER TEENA CHRISTEL / JAY LEWIS 8809 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, WA 98026 TAX PARCEL ID NUMBER 00594500000400 LEGAL DESCRIPTION TALBOT SEAVIEW ADDITION, LOT #4, SECTION 18, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN & DRAWINGS THOMAS ESTEP DESIGN TOMESTEP@aol.com 220 270' Ave East Seattle, WA 98112 206 320.9063 phone STRUCTURAL ENGINEER SWENSON SAY FAGET Gary MacKenzie, Partner 2124 Third Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98121 206 443.6212 phone PROJECT SCOPE VN-A,l LOT COVERAGE NO CHANGE TO EXITING BUILDING FOOTPRINT �J ITV MAP inunus area, wasnington, United Sta all 'k,w 4 ands t �;`. i yi.J?at YA>•45."y �'•�y�i i 4. v. �:.`� ... �tQ Lam• ml tes A. AV �-3 �40 Ef PPPOVED BY PLANNING r •-. '1 '"WY re,� Zone d Comer„��,F1 o f .. � �' � *�,•�'"P^" �� � C nc,�ne�S . e 1 `Nothin ,i in this permit aPA o process shall be Front Raired ct 1.�,.._ _ interpreted " allowing or permitting the Sides ftwntenance of' any currently mistin; illegal, Rear �n \ nonconforming or un�termiu, building, structure or site condition ahich io oule the .sco a of the Other �cJ{'' permit applicnttou, re �a d p e --�-- SITC M�� building, structure or ccoond lion is shown on the Hem - --- — site lan or drawing. Such building, structure or separate condition may be the subject of a enforcement action." F4'?IiFTIN 1 1 4 . MAR 12 (l SP t. �^ • ^ _ Nt — • �v I /V." ev q I rn rn IND o rn