Loading...
9106 OLYMPIC VIEW DR.PDFIiiiiiiiiiiii 12659 9106 OLYMPIC VIEW DR ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: or a oc) & d6 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): Ige O' OSV 2 COVENANTS'(RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: `"� -I DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: I I l'1 19 PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:_ SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: / 1 -3 SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: I OTHER: �� ! / q l" O q l LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc C CA FILE NO. Citical Areas Checklist -------- ----------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) I 1. SiteAddress/Location: �1/d� Cir�tir►�o1'�V�'�,,,�m�nd_� WM 2. Property Tax Account Number: 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? ,� yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? i % s r 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all tha apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. >— Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). C Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of.33 to 66-feet). _ C Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ff/0 ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: M ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway NO floodplain Np of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? j/Vp Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow : shrubs _ : mixed i'c urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: ft�_chkdm; Rev 10/03/97 R7z37, RECEIVED City of Edmonds AUG 2 0 1999 T=7 _ PERMIT COUNTER CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant; or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed COPY of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: -1414 >YMA1 Name P0.1 61 9l o b Street Addr ss YC-m \11-4 �0� City State Zip k —` el-64p wk �is -77R 37 2.I� �rr► Telephone 4-97-6,kdY ,4fX Signature -Yl v/?g Date Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Date ;:receptionVanalcacl.doc � � � � � v' (over) City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Anita Armour Determination #: CA-99-237 -] Project Name: N/A Permit Number: N/A Site Location: 9106 Olympic View Dr Property Tax Acct #: 182704-2-006-005 Project Description: None provided Determination: Study Required Based upon a field visit to your home and information here at City Hall, there appears to be a slope in front of the house (west side) that may qualify as a Steep Slope Critical Area. Prior to making application for development activity near this area, a more detailed analysis of the site must be provided. If the activity will not be located in or around the suspected critical area, please refer to the section in bold below. Steep Slope Hazard Area Delineation Requirements To determine the extent of a Steep Slope Hazard Area, a topographic survey of the property, prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor must be obtained. Any slope of 40% or more, with at least 20 feet of vertical rise will be classified as a Steep Slope Hazard Area. From the toe or top of the Steep Slope Hazard Area, a 50-foot buffer plus a 15-foot building setback is required. The survey is to confirm the presence of a Critical Area and locate the buffer and building setback as mandated by ECDC Chapter 20.15B. For development of any kind that is proposed within the, 50-foot buffer, the 15-foot building setback, or critical area itself, the following options may apply: A licensed geologist or geotechnical engineer may provide evidence to demonstrate that a buffer alteration down to 10 feet plus a 15-foot buffer setback will have no adverse impact upon the site, the public or any private party. This effectively reduces the requirement from a total of 65 feet from the top or toe or slope down to 25 feet. A geotechnical analysis of the site and statements regarding the setback reduction and lack of adverse impact on the public is required prior to any development permit application. 2. If development must occur within the critical area, buffer and/or setback and is not identified as an exception, a variance or Reasonable Use Exception and variance pursuant to ECDC Section 20.15B. may be possible. If the property owner wishes to apply for a specific development permit which they feel would not impact the Critical Area located on the site, they may submit their proposal to the Planning Division for review. If the Planning Division finds that the proposed development permit will not adversely impact a Critical Area or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis. Karissa Kawamoto .� 9/20/99 Name Signature Date fnc.189v Date: To: Subject: Transmitting • 9 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering Letter of Transmittal September 21, 1999 Anita Armour Recently issued critical area determination Revised checklist For Your Information: X As you requested: For your file: Comment: The waiver box was inadvertently checked when it should have been study required. If you have any questions feel free to call. Note attachments: X Sincerely, Karissa Kawamoto, Planner BARBARAFAHEY MAYOR • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan `nC.1S91) Anita Armour P.O. Box 6126 Edmonds, WA 98026 Subject: Dear Applicant: CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering September 20, 1999 Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist # 99-237 BARBARAFAHEY MAYOR Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). y You must submit a copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. 40 Permit applications include the following: Enc: Determination * Architectural Design Board C: ReceptionUana\C R LTR.doc Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications Any other development permit applications. Thank you. Planning Secretary • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan �,..,Ne.q-�i�,kl'�'fl �fi t ` '�{ E:t '"� M ��`•°�'i�is`�t��r'Y{3�.�.4u � ?c�] 0 STET FILE 9-t. DEC 17 1JAU CITY OF EDMONDS - SIDE SEWER PERMIT PUBLIC. WORKS �e 90 14,°° PERMIT NO 8277 G Address of Construction: Property Legal Description (Include all. easements): TREATMENT PLANT Owner and/or Contractor: S' L �� U �� L� Z/U C State License No. I AN�I�'�Z z �` Building Permit No. 900 So CY �4Single Family ' Invasion into City Right -of -Way No ❑ Yes rQ Multi-Familyy(.No of Units ) RW Construction Permit No. ❑ Commercial ---'-Cross other Private'Property: No ❑ Yes F ❑ Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I c fy that I have read and shall comply with all city requirements asrndicated on the back of the Permit Card. Date * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION * Lid No.: Partial Inspection: Date Initial Comments Reason Rejected: -I Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date L - D Initial n , 0 ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3'90 ILR • T rl d To p I r �m 3 n r--- Q 'v cn Z �l K,; ;v LX t+:'J 0 a °z w x a TY —d CITY OF EDMONDS ` IBE SEWER PERMIT �8 g0STREET 194 FIL PERMIT N° 8277 Address of Constructior: Property Legal Description (Include all In o 01Pit ,� �nents): 00 (� C/ l - - - 1 Owner and/or Contractor: State License No. Rl 3. Z Building Permit No. 900 �O Single Family Invasion into City Right-of-Way:0, No ❑ Yes ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units ) RW Construction Permit No. ❑ Commercial Cross other Private Property: No ❑ Yes ❑ Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I c fy that I have read and shall comply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. /2-/7-C Date * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OFFICE .USE ONLY, * FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-3202, PUBLIC WO DEPT. Permit Fee. `,1'� Issued By Trunk Charge: �`��y`� Date Issued: Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: Lid No.: -- i Partial Inspection: Date Initial Comments Reason Rejected: Final Inspection Approved: Date Initial Date Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Bull Copy: Applicant Re,Secl 3'90 STR�..LARLE 41�,Oc Obv*scv' DAft MITIGATED FILE# N/A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Single Family Dwelling Proponent Anita Armour 919 6th Ave. S., Edmonds,. WA-- 98020 Location of proposal, including street address, if any. 9106 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA Lead Agency Edmonds Planning Division The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement -(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. x This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by September 15, 1990 Responsible Official John Bissell Position/Title Code Enforcement Tech. Phone 771-3202 Address 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds WA 98020 Date August 24, 1990 Signature ( )� X You may appeal this determination of nonsignificance to Hearing Examiner at 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds, WA 98020 no later than 5:00 p.m., September 18, 1990 by filing a written appeal citing reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact John Bissell to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. There is no agency appeal. CONDITIONS OF MITIGATION ANITA ARMOUR BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK # 196 This determination of-nonsignificance is subject to the following conditions: 1. All excavation and grading shall comply with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code, 1989 edition. 2. The Applicant shall obtain a building permit from the Building Department and comply with all conditions of permit approval. 3. The Applicant -shall submit ---a drainage plan to -the City Engineering Division and follow the required guidelines. 4. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of Hong West & Associates, Project Number 90084, report dated August 10, 1990. S. A qualified engineer shall be retained on site to observe excavation and soil conditions, and the Applicant shall follow the foundation recommendations of said engineer. 6. The Applicant shall submit a tree cutting plan, a clearing plan, and a landscaping.plan to the Planning Division prior .to any clearing or grading on the site. The required landscape -plan shall have -a time table for compleation, and completion will be required prior to finalization of the subject building permit. 7. The Applicant shall make every reasonable effort to keep exposed soil covered during construction. 8. The Applicant is to make every possible effort to keep dust controlled and to keep the streets clear of dirt and debris. Ills 10 pl 6,oEce J S`oo���� R-� , 0o NE TO � AINAGE CONTROIrCATCH BASW .E 14' LO. CLA.VER�C— J CATCH BL W/ lip. PRECAST CONCRETE. AS.6G. CB-10. OR EOUAL �s NOTE: ----- J= \ �v \ c F G `Ci VERIFY LOCATION / -ORDINATE BERVICEB C0UN)o 17 SITE PLAN TOPOGRAPHIC AND PROPERTY SCALE: V = 20' LINES ARE FROM SURVEY BY L.S.A. DRAWING, DATED 2/5/90. aa4 �z*f-wFIatT CHp9ur 0D,/0r eTJPU05 P-LOH61 *W)f1-CUT M I , Pam!; r-7k ~,d T .G -,Vt Lol µ,,T ke451V649 row WXM-L 51,WLJ- DE �xNmc1G0 Bu i uO� 1�0-� K&t N WL4%C-r%'T. @ FN. c,R6o� B.rr�r'Vne�, ai� 1—o1 -for 4nN.L r%4�Irlcl.� N ►a.. ~ a W Zn z Q 1 <. 0 a,Lu r w•C H = Na I SHEET K I FILE NO. 2309. TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THESE DRAWINGS. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area." respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: 9'nr�Tf} �rv►oHk. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 9� 9 617t �-✓� S• �Dw�v�As, v�l� 980Zo 4. Date checklist prepared: 8// 1 %90 5. Agency requesting checklist: G!r-y or- Aavy,�M 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. ME 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. So I LS ",1AvX7- 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. e r oT SPG r gpp,¢ovr� Foie - 9"J7K42eq- PeaP�Rry .p.,AI r31A6 L.dr Aror +0TEK0-dr 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You'do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information cn project desc-iption.) A/I tv coti s 7nvr-r 2 23G 0 6:✓'ors �e,�.r/ on vri�ta- ��"� oy�' .i��c, 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 9/ 0(o t9ky ple_ Vir ry AiR. y ;8AM av DS TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other 'OC, ,P -140 ro //sue s/a`o� •c�o�.,r �.a •-./ ,[o b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 60 4/a ok�t !;,k ,4( P'-*�-,- -� 51: c c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. /1r r psai/1' 3r )icr,/F-<- 'C.-W,oy 5,crl 61.,, o (o c sh r,r+ / f Ge- SO,A !I@�/O✓�' . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. /Y,37 Aetcjo'twiM, 740 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 3 So cK / a e- Ct/i 61Z�v�oy�f f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. CL, r 9-1' 8 4.Dri. S-i nE. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project const((r//uction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? l7'al° h. Proposed measures -to reduce or control erosion, or other impac=s to the earth, if any: I 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 7,— 4c--Y� 't17 /ne hh GL%- b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If '/ so, generally describe. ra c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NVfJ& 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. ro/4 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N1A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/4 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Are 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Al Ll 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Ajj,,,, p✓jikrw S�Ti-�,O �O /ems 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. !' O d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass _ pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? '34'45 E 0/vi.r(,"a y a,'/y --1 yv�Ess @ %aA e, cn-ly c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. A10N6 A/Owd d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: /1-�✓C7i5 / GamA; la'.J 4'-"41 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle,4ongbir , other: ............................. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: ................................. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: .................... b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Na ",-f— c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. pla d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Nlh 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: �e5cG2/lf� 4, G +,O/'ate. �..+i`ff. S'fa�e X—� e,,y [0,A) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. /t/ O 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. rVO r"^ 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: IJ/14 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NVA�_ 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? /'Ls b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Na . c. Describe any structures on the site. Aa Sf­tW d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? ri � S� e. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? j /Z h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Na i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Z/ j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N.- k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, 7 middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. /A - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 2-0 H^ f2 akQe. a / 10l✓ b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Alk b. Could light or glare from the,finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N0 c. What existing off -site sources -of light or glare may affect your proposal? NO --e.- d: Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: /A//A 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. /10 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Allh 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/)O- I c. Proposed measures -to reduce or control impacts, if any: A11 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing stre t system. Show on site plans, if any. 4�i5 7;--7 ir' ,Is,IAr ko"e—% ,6 S71G sw sd't b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 7 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Nd e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N� f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. *'_7 ? g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NQ .. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 1 04-8-�z b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. VIA 16. Utilities a. c rrent ilable a site: at refus ice elepho ectric' , natural gas, ary s er, sep other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. !/77 G< 7Z ,-'-_5 /17z-� /00" �� lA`'Li9 L?'`� ✓+. �1��e3-rim Co '.ivse <'ho ti S Q'J C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead ency 's reMn them to make its decision. Signature:... .................................... .............. Date Submitted: ..................................... D. Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (Rezones, Code Changes, Annexations, etc.) -- Do not use this sheet for project actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed Eeasures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed ceasures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed reasures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: • 6. Now would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. ENVCHK3/PFORMS La CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The information the environment possible. 1. LAND on this form of the City PROJECT NAME yy�tg �,Q,�, pyieip, i� DATE SUBMITT—Eff— will be used `t8-4mine of Edmonds.,j#4ease rXWDr the effect of your action upon each question as thoroughly as s,Ae� 5L s Area W/2-(a(a 5F- Soils Type 6c�rA4-, Limitations °O Description of topography (% slope) Note: If grading or filling will exceed Grading: Estimated cubic yards 5'o t 500 cubic yards, a grading & Filling: Estimated cubic yards ZO filling plan must be submitted with the application Estimated area to be paved (including buildings) z ci? 3-') _%r Estimated area in open space (previous surface) 1-7 � ��� S,- 2. WATER 0 4. Stream - Estimated flow (cubic feet per Will stream be altered? If yes, 0 pact on storm drainage acent to shorelines zone VFGFTATION second) ly�,, tg/what degree/ p'er water bodies? thod of handling runoff n zuu tee o Type and approximate number of trees 0-0 r (0/�0) Minimum diameter of trees to remain % of trees to be removed lo Groundcover (,7,, -0g,5 % to be removed Proposed landscaping, if any EXISTING LAND USE WITHIN 300 FEET RADIUS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Single Multi - Vacant Family Family Commercial Other North X South X East �. est 5. CIRCULATION Estimated increase in auto trips daily Availability of public transportation o �✓ vK 6. AREA OF IMPACT Neighborhood City-wide Regional 7. EFFECT ON AIR QUALITY "')"e, 8. CHANGES IN NOISE GENERATION C'��Sf ��';��, 04/17/89 ENVIRON/TXTMBO61 CITY OF.EDMONDS . �P.�M11V� Permit No. 70 / �.CON4UNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT / Imo., . �! �- Issue Date _ LO�� RIGHT=OF=WA' CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Wom-!- NOT 0("C' Washington Natural Gas Company A. •Owner: B. 4 Contractor: Name. Name 8815 Mercer Street eati8l.eddressWA 98111 Mailing Address � City. State Zip' City State., - Zip' State License. Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity, of Construction: 9106 Olympic View Drive Type of Work to be Done: Install New Service D. Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat. ® Single Family ❑ City Projects'. ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ❑ Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ® Y ❑ N F. • Sized Cut: 2 X. 4 . (1) @ Gas . APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN. INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and .by his sigture to this app}licaign, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds . harmless from any injuries, damages; or claims of af, iffidlor descrtpfion whatsoever,.forseen or•unforseen, that may'. be made against the City of Edmonds, for any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any, legal proceedings including defense costs; court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE .CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP . AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD' OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final. street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit. or credit will be processed. for issuance to the applicant.' • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 . • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to.be in accordance with City Code: • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be, available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: Date: December 17, 1990 Owner. or Contractor This Permit Must. be Posted of the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work >, APPROVED BY: .a Z Time Authorized: Void after MMCN I days. O w Special Conditions: NA E, C4 0- w RELEASED B PERMIT FEE:J� Restoration Fee: Receipt No. Fund III Fee: Street Cut. Dimensions:' Date (Q �0 INSPECTED BY NO WORK TO BEGIN. PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Date FIELD INSPECTION (Fund I I I - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July 1983 0 M M n AVAd*-g-EnergyGm p&V SIo� oL-r vw o� Addendum to: City of' Edmonds Permit Application Engineering Aide: Kerry Walsh Washington. Natural Gas 622-6767 x2761 CP- �/-14� n depth unknown Key: s- sanitary sewer w- wa er g- gas water valve hydrant 815 Mercer St. (P.O. Box 1869), Seattle, WA 98111(206) 622-6767 a Z O w E- U aG O u. CITY OF EDMONDS COMMNIY SERVICES DEPART 7Qf 'RI .GHTUOFTWAY CONSTRUC IOI ET • ` G V 94krrhit No. 3 L&I 4 7 wIssue Date I - a 7 - f)i A. •Owner: S- P. (.AND BUILDL-ft..; INC. B. • Contractor: Py Name- Name \%314 21 ST AV NW 'Zlol$ I-�wyri�i Mailing Address Mailing Address �P�ttl.� cl451l'1 C'Dmom fnS WA gf�OZd City State Zip City State Zip v-,r-.-r - M A a--r# N !ol 0 -3Zol State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: �1 10 to (O L 4 M P I C. V I & W D 9- Type of Work to be Done: III STA-t_l_ UP'Q(=9ti-RCUFv 0 FAL1L-1 T 1.6S OrQ PO LL- -ro G (-- PLY E nl L-W GVS'To m E=(A- D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat (dingle Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ❑ Utility E. • Pavement Cut: El Y 911' F..• Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legalproceedings, including defense costs, co °4 `"colsts., 4tor ey fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees'will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for. inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to, be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean. at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to endof working -day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: ' ' !_1 Date: - ZS Owner or Contractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: Time Authorized: Void after 30 days. Special Conditions: PERMIT'FEE: 0 F-,V- 51LL&-9 Restoration Fee:. Receipt No.:_ Fund I I I ' Fee: _ � Street Cut Dimensions: x = $ RELEASED BY:NA ,�'' Dat�"i�) INSPECTED BY Date NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE rng. vrv. rviarcn ivov WFIELD INSPECTION NO (Fund I I I - Route copy to Street Dept)* ` Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 1476 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY • REV.7/37 LOCATION 9 106 QL. M P I C V I (--W D P_ SC7 CC) AREA , POLE NO. OW1/4 S it TZ7 R4 DATE Z-91 W.O. NO. 3Z-3p REASON FOR WORK P90V I OC U 0 0 6 Q RoU IJ 17 ENGINEER MPt-R_TI N DWG. No. 090'2 �a Z SVC: FV P_ S- P. LA -ND 13V IL-DC-i2. DRAFTER U.G. NO. RS_ SCALE Z G�p� DATE --WORK- COMPLETED DATE PRINTED APPROVED FOREMAN IFNVIRONMFNTAI ANAI YSIS - - .I FEES--REQ DIT $'YES Cl NO IN LALMF' I U NU I LXLMF' 1 PARA. 18 ITEM C PRIMARY_ OVERHEA O.H. U.G. COND. Kv ❑ RESIDENTIAL' ADD CKT. FT. PH ❑ 'COMMERCIAL - - .: ..... . LEO#` 0. — .$ REM NET_ CKT. FT. PH CKT. FT. O.H. U.G. coND. Kv } SECONOARY 'OVER EAD - BASIC . EE $ ADD CKT. FT. PH . _ . ............ .___.._ ./. ®,$ REM CKT. FT. PH _:.. NET-= - CKT. FT. .. METER-,CONV. POL PERMITS (DATE GRANTED) ❑ TREE TRIM - - PRIMARY- UNDERGROJ ND ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ COMMERCIAL BASIC I EE $ .STATE - - - ❑ COUNTY LEUV _. _ 9 CITY- . Epn,oupS - EASEMENTS ❑ REOUIRED :. NOT- REOUIRED _ .... SECONDARY_ UNDERGROUND---. - _ oo UNDERGROUND--.PLT -- _.. -- _..__.., _..... DATE; RELEASED _. - .. BASIC --FEE, --- - : ' FT; ®$ ._ $ FOREIGN CON1 ❑ GTNW JPN ACTS - STREET LIGHTLNG FT.:®$ ..: . •- $ .= - :O_ CATV JPN ❑ JOINT TRENCH 3TNW & CATV WORK- IN --RIGHT; O -WAY*- - ❑ JOINT BORE GT 4W & CATV O PRIMARY.. _..__ .J ❑ POLE STENCILING ❑..SECONADARY___ ... FT: ®$ _ $ FROM TO MISCELLANEOUS- FEES TAKE OFF POLE - VAULT $ ComoniD5 PERMIT $ SC> PRE-CONSTR. ❑ TREE TRIM REOUIREMENTS O POD LOCATOR PC O Fps✓ $ 4 by - O BACKHOE ❑ _ $ O ONE CALL DA $ # TOTAL DUE $ To INDEX POLES PLAT ILOGS U-MAP _ DATE PAID Z-Z(o -91 RECEIPT# _ '�3 0 _59 -3 XFMR C-MAP NEW SVCE APPLICATION# 111 `i 1 5 LOCATION MAP PAGE 5 • Q t�.►ST A 3�� SEA- Q�SE.R ON E��ST�NG- PoVE / pLA(-E RED-TAnt&VLAZ SQL uNOEQ.C.RCVNO P6p�srAL PT 6 ASE m.F POLE N-S STRKED a'uN Sp :...+10._, 015 ..:DOWN...... P-%Se2 TO-- 3 SIN R n,N(--<-'Togs - i W.b. it- zo DPB IN.. LVST D'.TC.N FR.v.eA _. P G 0 L-ST`P• L. TO M L--' E4L �S E T-3oji ,, .r,ITY tF EDMONDS . . ,COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT'- OF -WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A. • Owner: Washington Natural Gas Company NIT eMercer Street eaiheddress WA 98111 City State -- Zip Permit No. JX ? Issue Date B. • Contractor: Name Mailing Address City State Zip State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: 9106 Olympic View Drive Type of Work to be Done: Install New Service • �i►r�A� D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat K Single Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ❑ Utility E. • Pavement Cut: El Y ❑ N F. • Size of Cut: 2 X 4 (1) @ Gas APPLICANT TO READ AND. SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and .by his. signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or.unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of. its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces; at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. . • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all'times. • Traffic. Control to be in accordance with City regulations. 0 All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt.or City approved material prior to end of working day, NO.EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at .all times. Signature: Date: March 20, 1991 Owner or Contractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: . \A,< PERMIT FEE:. •�E P109_ZZ> OTime Authorized: Void after days.PJl Restoration Fee: W Special Conditions: Receipt No.: lelie ,4L. -� 919—.59 ¢ Fund 11.1 Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: x = $ U RELEASED BY: Date 27/ INSPECTED BY Date a , O w ,r NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE 0 Eng. Div: March I989 r aim FIELD INSPECTION NOW (Fund III - Route copy to Street%ept.)` Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ' ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 Wc'15*- M NaWa &ii glob OL�-r vW �� UM!'_ to-4-A— Addendum to: City of Edmonds Permit Application Engineering Aide: Kerry Walsh Washington. Natural Gas 622-6767 x2761 l C n depth unknown Key: s- sanitary sewer w— wa er g— gas water valve hydrant 815 Mercer St. (P.O. Box 1869), Seattle, WA 98111(206) 622-6767 • 0 ACTION: STREEjSF/*ASSET CITY OF EDMONDS ORMATION FINANCE DEPARTMENT o EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 o (206) 775-2525 SHEET ASSET NO. BATCH DATE E-V�Nl NEW E ADD 0 TRANSFER E RETIRE A S s E CATEGORY CODE: SERIAL NO. DESCRIPTION: � o� t;'LQ� X L\ -,Ne__, T I LOCATION: 9 10(,0 <- A r,\ N F "L" - LOCATION CODE: 0 R ACCOUNT M, A 'DEPRECIATION CODE: FV,' EN LIFE OF ASSET: S YEARS T I 0 WARRANT/ PROJECT: N 3NO. DATE: COST $ - INITIATED .BY APPROVED BY I R ACCOUNTING USE ONLY E T RETIREMENT DATE I R RETIREMENT METHOD E M RECEIPT NO. TOTAL DEPRECIATION $ E N GAIN (LOSS) T DEPARTMENT FILE . 1 LONG VV EST & ASSOCIATES • Geotechnical Engineering • Hydrogeology • Materials Testing • Construction Inspection • Geotechnical Soils Investigation New Residence For Anita Armour 9106 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, Washington August 10, 1990 Our Project Number 90084 Prepared For Behm Design 201 Fifth Avenue South #Z Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Mr. Jay Behm 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General A soils and foundation investigation was conducted on the project site. Location of the site is shown on Figure 1, the Project Location Map. As designed, a new two story residence is planned at the project site with a conventional spread foot- ing supporting the sructure. 1.2 Authorization The authorization to proceed with the study was received in a signed letter by Mr. Jay Behm; of Behm Design, dated July 24, 1990. 1.3 Purpose of this Investigation The purpose of this investigation is to: a) Determine the subsurface conditions of the project site. b) Recommend the footing design parameters. d) Evaluate slope stability of the project site. c) Recommend the lateral soil pressures for retaining wall design. 1 P.O. Box 596, Lynnwood, Washington 98046 • (206) 774-0106 U 1 1 2.0 PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS 2.1 Surface Conditions The project site consists of a irregularly shaped parcel situated east of the Olympic View Drive and south of the Sunset Way in Edmonds, Washington. The southwest portion of the site is roughly trapezoidal, and the proposed residence will be situated in this portion of the site. The northwest por- tion of the site is of triangular shape. The site slopes toward the northwest, with a total topographic relief of approximately 30 feet over a horizontal distance of approximately 60 feet. At the time of HWA's visit, most of the southwest por- tion of the project site was grass -covered. Trees and bushes are found in the northwest portion of the site and along the property lines. 2.2 Subsurface Exploration The HWA project engineer supervised and logged the soil exposed in four test pits excavated on August 7, 1990. Figure 2, the Site Plan Map, shows the approximate test pit locations. The test pits were excavated with a tire -mounted backhoe. The soils from each test pit were examined and represen- tative soil samples were sealed in air tight containers and brought back to HWA's office/laboratory for further examination. Figures 3 to 6 show the detailed soil logs. 2.3 Soil Stratigraphy Soil units encountered in the test pits are as follows: Unit A: Topsoil The project site is partially underlain by a unit of loose, dark gray topsoil. Unit A was encountered in test pit TP-2 and TP-4. Unit A was approximately one foot thick. Unit B: Fill Fill material was observed in test pit TP-1. The unit was loose, dry, grayish brown, fine sandy silt. Some cobbles were observed in the unit. The unit was approximately 3 feet thick. Unit C: Glacial Outwash Outwash sand was encountered test pits TP-1 and TP-2 below Unit B and Unit A, respectively. Unit C was a loose, brown, silty fine to coarse sand with a trace of fine gravel. The unit was three (3) feet ' thick in test pit TP-1, and was one (1) foot thick in test pit TP-2. Unit D: Glaciolacustrine ' Glaciolacustrine deposits were encountered in all test pits. The unit was medium stiff to hard, gray, slickensided, sandy silt and silty sand. This was the lowermost unit encountered in the test pits. 1 1 ' 2.4 Groundwater ' No ground water was observed during the test pit excavation. ' 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 Slope Stability Based on the subsurface conditions observed during the test pit excavation, it appears that the project site is situated on a stable slope. In addition, an area field reconnaissance did not reveal indications of distress in the nearby structures. However, a medium stiff lacustrine deposit was encountered at a 1 depth of 7 feet in test pit TP-3, which was relatively wet. This may indicate that an abondoned stream bed may exist in the close proximity to TP-3, and one time may have extended between TP-1 and TP- 2. During construction, this area should be re-examined by HWA. The footings may need to be deepened at certain locations. The design provided by Behm Design, dated July 5, 1990, depicts an up slope southeast of the proposed residence, and a down slope northwest of the proposed residence. Both the up slope and the 1 down slope will be graded to approximately 2HA V (Horizontal: Vertical) by cut and fill operations. Some of the spread footings of the proposed deck will be supported on the compacted fill on the down slope. Based on the soil conditions observed in test pits TP-3 and TP-4 (which are native medium stiff to hard lacustrine deposits) it is acceptable to cut the up slope to 2HAV. However, vegetation should be planted on the cut slope to minimize the potential for surficial erosion. The down slope is designed to be filled to a 2H:1V slope, and will have a topographic relief of ap- proximately 10 feet. From HWA's previous experience with similar situations, it is relatively difficult to satisfy the compaction criterion near the outer edges of the proposed fill slope, unless the cut opera- tion is carried out after the compaction is completed. However, compact -and -cut operation is relatively expensive. On the other hand fill materials that are improperly compactedl may result in an unstable ' slope. Therefore, HWA recommend that concrete retaining wall be used to retain the compacted fill. The vegetation growing on the existing slope has positive effect on the stability of the slope because roots reinforce the in situ soils and prevent erosion. Removal of the existing vegetation, which will ' lead to decay of the roots, undoubtedly will have adverse effects on the slope. Therefore, in HWA's opinion, removal of the existing vegetation should be kept to a minimum. Building set back is not necessary if footings at the down slope side of the building are founded two (2) feet into the very stiff to hard lacustrine deposit. ' 3.2 Spread Footing Design Parameters Conventional spread footing foundations can be used for the project site. The following design parameters are recommended: a) All footings should be cast on hard lacustrine deposits at the down slope side of the building. Footing on the uphill side of the building may be cast on medium stiff lacustrine deposits. I 1 b) An allowable bearing capacity of 2500 pounds per square foot (psf) can be used. c) All footings should be embedded at least 18 inches from the footing grade to the ground surface. d) Minimum footing widths are 1.5 and 2.0 feet for the strip and square footings, respectively. e) Footing excavations should be finished in a neat condition. No soft and disturbed soils should be remain beneath the footing foundation. f) The existing lacustrine deposit can be easily disturbed and softened when it becomes wet. When such conditions exist, the bearing surface should be over -excavated at least two (2) feet below the footing grade, and be filled with lean concrete. g) All bearing surfaces should be tested and verified for the recommended bearing capacity by a representative from Hong West & Associates (HWA). 3.3 Retaining/Footing Wall Design The down slope concrete retaining wall should be designed such hat the un-retained height above the wall is not more than four (4) feet, and the back slope should not more than 2H:1V. The retaining wall should be designed to withstand the following lateral pressures, calculated in terms of equivalent fluid unit weight: a) 35 pcf, yielding wall, level backfill b) 55 pcf; yielding wall, back slope not more than 2H:1V, un-retained height less than 4 feet. The footing wall should be designed to withstand a lateral pressure of, in terms of equivalent fluid unit weight, 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Retaining and footing walls should also conform to the following criteria: c) Retaining and footing wall backfill should consist of free draining, clean sand and gravel with less than 3 % by weight passing a #200 sieve. d) All backfill should be compacted to as specified in Section 3.4. e) Footing drain should be provided by installing minimum 4 inch perforated pipes along the outer footing line. ' f) Retaining wall should be founded at least two (2) feet into the native, stiff to hard lacustrine deposit. The bearing surface should be inspected by a HWA representative. 3.4 Compaction Standard ' Native soils beneath building foundations should be proof -rolled to 95% of the Modified Proctor maxi- mum dry density (ASTM D 1557). ' 4 11 Any structural fill supporting the foundation should be compacted to 95% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. The structural fill should consist of clean sand and gravel with less than 3 % by weight passing through a #200 sieve. Any foundation wall backfill should be compacted to 95 % of the Modified Proctor maximum dry den- sity beyond 5 feet away from the wall, and to 92 % within 5 feet of the wall. Prior to fill placement, the down slope should be benched to allow better "bonding" between the native soil and fill material. All fill material used in constructing the down slope should be compacted to 95 % of the Modified Proctor dry density. Over compaction behind a retaining wall can result in unfavorable high lateral stress on the wall, and could tilt the wall. Therefore, the backfill within five (5) feet of the wall should be placed in thin layers, and utilize a hand operated compactor to achieve the required compaction standard. The procedure to achieve the proper density of a compacted fill depends upon the compaction equip- ment, the number of passes, thickness of each layer to be compacted, and certain soil properties. If small compaction equipment is used, the soil must be placed in thin enough layers to achieve the desired density. ' Generally, under compacted soils are the result of poor workmanship or of soils compacted at an im- proper moisture content. Soils with a high degree of silt and clay may easily become too wet, or coarse grained soils become too dry for maximum compaction. Silty or clayey soils with a water content higher than the optimum must be dried as necessary. Sprinkling is sometimes required to wet a coarse grained soil to its optimum water content before compaction. ' HWA recommend that compacted density of all fill material should be monitored as construction proceeds. 4.0 CLOSURE This soil investigation was conducted by generally accepted engineering standards. Experience has shown that programs planned and executed by these standards reveal with reasonably representative subsurface conditions. ' The analyses and recommendations contained in this report are made based on the assumption that the soil conditions encountered in the test pits are representative of actual conditions throughout the site. However, experience has also proven that subsurface conditions can vary radically over a small dis- tance. Inconsistent conditions can occur between test pits and not be detected by a geological study. If, ' during construction, the subsurface conditions encountered are different from those predicted by the results of this investigation, this office should 'be notified so that we can review the variances and reconsider our recommendations if necessary. ' Such unexpected conditions frequently require an additional capital expenditure in order to attain a properly constructed project. Therefore, some contingency fund should be made available to cover these potential costs. 1 5 This report is prepared for the exclusive use of the owner's design engineers and the architect for specific application on this project in accordance with generally accepted soils and foundation engineer- ing practice. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. In addition, geotechnical supervision is recommended during the construction phase to ensure that a safe, high quality construction is attained. Should there be any questions, please contact this office at your convenience. Since�H4�P reely, fit'.EEa H.E. Hong West & Associates President •®OOm^loeB rh mo • li 3 N 0 oemoam o�°�rAs ooe 0e e • e e T aid'��`�a �?OAJdl E0 C. LEGEND OF TERMS USED ON EXPLORATION SOIL LOGS The classification of soils in these logs is based on visual field and laboratory observations, based on ASTM D 2488. Soil descriptions con- sist of the following: Density/consistency, color, modifier, MAJOR CONSTITUENT, minor constituents, wetness, soil structures, additional remarks. Density/Consistency Soil density/consistency in test borings is usually based on the SPT, the standard penetration test or resistance, ASTM D1586. The test result is the sum of the of the blow counts for the last 12 inches of sampler drive. Non -Cohesive Soil Standard Cohesive Soil Standard Approximate Shear Density Penetration Consistancy Penetration Strength in TSF Resistance Resistance (Blows/foot) (Blows/foot) Very Loose 0-4 Very Soft 0-2 <0.125 Loose 4 - 10 Soft 2-4 0.125 - 0.25 Medium Dense 10 - 30 Medium Stiff 4-8 0.25 - 0.5 Dense 30 - 50 Stiff 8 - 15 0.5 - 1.0 Very Dense > 50 Very Stiff 15 - 30 1.0 - 2.0 Hard > 30 > 2.0 Wetness Dry Little perceptible moisture Damp Some perceptible moisture probably below optimum Moist probably near optimum moisture content Wet Much perceptible moisture probably above optimum Minor Constituents Estimated Percentage Trace 0-5 Some 5 - 12 Modifier (sandy, silty, etc.) 12 - 30 very plus modifier (sandy, etc.) 30 - 50 Terms Describing Soil Structures laminated composed of thin (less than 1 cm.) layers of varying color and texture. bedded composed of laminations greater than I cm in thickness of varying color and texture. interbedded composed of alternating beds of different soil types. well graded having a wide range of grain sizes, with substantial amounts of all intermediate particle sizes. poorly graded predominantly one grain size, or having a range of sizes with some intermediate sizes missing. fissured containing shrinkage cracks, frequently filled with fine sand or silt, usually more or less vertical. slickensided having inclined planes of weakness that are slick and glossy in appearance. calcareous containing appreciable quantities of calcium carbonate. HONG WEST & ASSOCIATES 9 LEGEND OF SYMBOLS APPEARING ON THE SOIL LOGS GRAPHICAL SYMBOLS FOR SOIL TYPES NON —COHESIVE SOILS (<50% passing the 200 sieve) GW well graded gravel and gravel/sand mix GP poorly graded gravel, gravel/sand mix GM silty gravels, gravel/sand/silt mix GC clayey gravels, gravel/sand/clay mix SW well graded sands, gravelly sands SP poorly graded sands, few fines SM silty sands, sand/silt mix SC clayey sands, sand/clay mix COHESIVE SOILS (>50% passing 200 sieve) ML inorganic silts and very fine sands CL inorganic, low plastic clay mixes OL organic, low plastic clays, silt/clay mix MH inorganic, micaceous silts, silt/sand mix CH inorganic, high plastic clays OH organic, medium to high plastic clays Pt peat and other highly organic soil Note: The graphical symbols used for the vz based on the symbols recommendated it Classification system. Graphical log: jective field indentification of soil .data where available. Letter designat the basis of laboratory data and calc SAMPLE TYPE SYMBOLS BOREHOLE SAMPLES ® 2.0' 00 Split Spoon (SPT) IShelby Tube 3.0' 00 Split Spoon with Brass Rings aGrab Samples (cuttings) mCore Run TEST PIT SAMPLES 0 Bag (bulk sample) OGrab (small volumn) IShelby Tube .HAND BORING SAMPLES Z Non—standard penetration (40 lb. hammer with 12 inch drop) OGrab Sample (post hole) IShelby Tube ROTARY BOREHOLE SAMPLES Continuous Core Samples rious soil types are the Unified Soil are based on sub s, and laboratory ions are assigned on ulations. GROUNDWATER INSTALLATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS ntonite Seal out Backfill ttings Backfill or Caved Hole iezometer Casing Groundwater Level (noted during drilling) Groundwater Level (measured in piezometer after water level stabilized) lotted Piezometer Tip d Backfill ATTERBERG LIMITS PL ILL o — Natural Moisture PL — Plastic Limit LL — Liquid Limit HONG WEST G ASSOCIATES 11 I Ll 1 1 1 1 I i ----- i ---------r--- --- =-f — --f — 1615- T _ MECOUN'YALE ^ PARK I I MEADOWDAL'n - — ----------------,-------- ---I -- — ---- � f LAEB!/G7EH 2 WHARF o r v 111 1 BR 01 t=;, .. i : O I 1 I- 1/j9oo R ttt BAY I 1 ' ✓ I sF9 rPeISr ST SW 1 %TV I I 471 .P FREDERIC P i f SH $T SW -� —, -.PARK PROPER�I I Approximate Project Location I P� s 'Sw _ . 1 0 2 ter sT, to isw •.tro 2 ta�tsT 3 Pi OVERLOOK wr Ho SW w, V 1 x ��,N19ATH� 5 s %t T Sw19, �u`i3 •,:� ' I i 14N5 I> KT 3 Q�suinnv; x 85 1 qqF 1 I >,ast M5185TH PSW W a3 i 35We' �. I T. t 4 s U;Kr:. w IB6T bi :itB6 N W z x 3 �tF. `: 1 _ 1/ryO_... OSl Q`• i87T1 .�:..:N VI;W PL $W svh — — — — — — ---01891H -- —3 i-- 188TIi RSt a__.tn PLjyy T 199TH �Q r = �-+ a 189TH �C �pL 'fr-�'•r WATER . STS�SLAKE S SW '= 191ST ST 191ND �PLT%SW WSW 51e SI,R 181S=•O' JS ,-.•tea V I I 4f j rt 18IH t_�pz 3e _ �192ND PL SW -' . I : �' ] IV W ST 193 D PL SW „H 1 Y i ORr M L O` A. 4T Si KT (; SW I-T. jH 3 = •'.)gaTH, PL 3 SW • ' �a 2 y F t _ 5 �7 /F/y \vT; '' 9 NSW sr 1 L r� cp P W 9Z/ 196TH ST SSW 8 i Project Location Map New Residence for Anita Armour HONG WEST & ASSOCIATES Edmonds, Washington Figure 1 1 1 ru Site Plan Map ; New Residence for Anita Armour - Edmonds, Wasington ■ ■ ' svrset � ay • (o a. Property Line; ■ ;TP-2 % .` TP-3 1 : ji : % : 1 ■ : " eck • Proposed • % d: . c c % Residence ..............• • Ex►sting 15 ► P a d ve Roadway ra e t T n P-4 ....... se ............... • TP-1 , •. • . Garage 00 ro � Note: *Topographic and property lines are from survey by LSA drawing ••• dated 2/5/90 File #2389 I SCALE 1 " = 20' • * Test pit locations shown are '• • approximated I • 1 lONG WEST & ASSOCIATES Figure 2 i HONG WEST G ASSOC I ATES . TEST PIT LOG W NATURAL MOISTURE % a c MOISTURE % co w J Q d W 0 10 20 30 40 10 60 70 so ZcnSYMBOLS DESCRIPTION 0 I� ........ 2 .. .. . I, .. i� q I� is is . w w LL is z I; w 06 •.... . i FI Loose, brownish gray, fine sandy to gravelly LL SILT. Dry. Some cobbles up to 12 inch. (Fill) SM Loose, brown, silty fine to coarse SAND. Trace fine gravel. (Outwash) ML Medium stiff, brownish gray, sandy SILT. Interbedded medium dense, silty sand. (Transition bed between lacustrine and outwash) End of test pit 10 i PROJECT NAME: New Residence For Anita Armour TEST PIT TP-1 LOCATION: Edmonds, Washington DATE EXCAVATED: 8/7/90 PROJECT NUMBER: 90084 SURFACE ELEVATION: ft. TOTAL DEPTH: 9 ft. Figure 3 W W U- Z H a W 0 I 1 fl 1 i HONG WEST G ASSOCIATES TEST PIT LOG w NATURAL MOISTURE % co 4 o MOISTURE % W a cc 0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 e0 'c<n SYMBOLS DESCRIPTION ICI III I I Soft, black TOPSOIL. SM Loose, grayish brown, silty fine to coarse SAND. Damp. (Outwash) ML Stiff, gray, sandy SILT. Interbedded fine to SM medium sand. Some oxidation in sand layer. Damp (Transition bed between lacustrine and outwash) ML Very stiff to hard, gray, clayey SILT. Slickensided. (lacustrine) End of test pit i PROJECT NAME: New Residence For Anita Armour TEST PIT T P - 2 LOCATION:!Edmonds, Washington DATE EXCAVATED: 8/7/90 PROJECT NUMBER: 90OB4 SURFACE ELEVATION: ft. Figure 4 TOTAL DEPTH: 9 ft. HONG WEST G ASSOCIATES TEST PIT LOG NATURAL MOISTURE % c MOISTURE % °' w J 0- 0 io zo 30 40 50 Bo 10 eo SYMBOLS ML �- 4 W W LL Z H •I d W •' o g .. DESCRIPTION Medium stiff, brownish gray, fine sandy SILT. Damp. Numerous tiny air voids up to a depth of 3 feet (Lacustrine) . Stiff to very stiff. Medium stiff, highly fractured. End of test pit PROJECT NAME: New Residence For Anita Armour LOCATION: Edmonds, Washington PROJECT NUMBER: 90084 TEST PIT TP-3 DATE EXCAVATED: B/7/90 SURFACE ELEVATION: ft. TOTAL DEPTH: 7 ft. w J co a cc W a ure 5 HONG WEST G ASSOCIATES TEST PIT LOG NATURAL MOISTURE % c MOISTURE % W J n. i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 SYMBOLS 0 ICI III III ML 2 .. .. .. 4 w w w z H............ 2 H a w 0 6 DESCRIPTION Soft, black TOPSOIL. Medium stiff, brownish gray, fine sandy SILT. Damp. Some fine to medium gravel. (Lacustrine) End of test pit 1 10 i 1 PROJECT NAME: New Residence For Anita Armour 1 LOCATION: Edmonds, Washington PROJECT NUMBER: 90084 I - Figure 6 i i TEST PIT TP-4 DATE EXCAVATED: 8/7/90 SURFACE ELEVATION: ft. TOTAL DEPTH: 6 ft. w J m Q W Q �3 • j / .� rJ WffOow LA),LA, TOcJvtt(�R,¢Z6t.r J --- -- --- --- .-- N 64e- I STREET FILE 00 2 �E TO n >. !i ' �INAGE 24' LO. CULVE CH BASIN 9� �`/1/�(}'�yC-�yL1,`�- 14' L0. CUIVER�IPC� 6.(7C ///Q PRE BASIN W/UD. O• vLl/L+lf,^ 111 S.6G. CB•10, OR EQUAL / ,s. WtM i \\1 NOTE. X�+m I DETENTION PIPE SYSTEM u� PER CITY DESIGN STANDARD C G �I VERIFY LOCATION / Z ORDMATE SERVICES p 1 N 54 —1 I lom6t Gg'jovz- 0-t 4 % wl", t!pp- Tr15�7 (1-s ? U.'# c- [S INV. vF "f+ A. SUMP NL NIETDS W! A.O.S. COVER hAul 4•/ T LINE FR T A LLE 'I`t � CK b /Proposed/ Residence y; e / e �rti DRIVEWAY/ / ASPHALT / / PAVE T Garage 56-A I -&- A4,46 1 T s I 0/ I I j nk" ��; Co R I 17 SITE PLAN TOPOGRAPHIC AND PROPERTY SCALE. V =ZOO LINES ARE FROM SURVEY BY L.S.A. DRAWING, DATED 2/5190, FILE NO. 2289. TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THESE DRAWINGS. I a 44&rz RANT Ic-ir Uf4%A,/E%e- 141P-Ves P• Wt- y 05PWVfdr- C11T Aare. t%ik at IM 1 to NOT N 06", %le, 15V^ L eE �xro1�?r-O W-" e rG.e. Bui LAle --eV- -L K*01 N ra�a+�P-rE+v-Tor4aL. Port. B5+t r1k9KI DL. loo.o' a N r z W Zc z Q o0 -j LU w r ¢ x to o. SHEET NC DETENTION WORKSHEET l J STANDARD DRAINAGE Pf-MT UPPER CATCH BASIN Or-ItNTION PIPE LENI:T/i COXr1IOL CATCH �VRNT � 6A.51 N •� to µlw, , 2. MAX COVER 1 1 11 OUTLGT COw-rROL� _ I�G 5LOPE---w I �" �— 4- 47 •_ iD OIJTLET (R! PRAP OR RUNOFF SYSTEM CROSS SECTION SPREADER ._ 2' a 2' a &;'DEEP, 4=6" SPALLS (M.OU.L) 0 V 2' >< 3" DEEP, '_ CRUS►+ED ROCK FROM T OLfTL ET CONTROL RIP RAP OUTLET W^SH£D GRAVEL OUTFLOW TRENCH, MIN 10' LONG, TOP 4- PERF PIPE TO HE LEVEL FRONT ' OUTSET" CONTROL 4- PERF PIPE' WITH CAPS RUNOFF SPREADER' OUTLET kjAUG ��D PERMIT 1100. � Nro FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE DETENTION SYSTEM for ii y+2'o'01�2 location_ 'VOG 01 " v,e�j plan by r. phone — k 0.90 date_Ta DESIGN DATA System Imperm Pipe Pipe Orifice Number Area Diam Length Diameter NOTES 1.,Call Engineering Division (771-32021 for prebackfill and final inspections. 2. Responsibility for operation and *maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the responsibility of the property owner(s). Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from catch basins to allow proper operation. The outlet control orifice must be kept open at all times. CITY OF EOMONDS Page 9 of 9 CONNECTED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM CITY OF EDMONDS —CONSTRUCTION PERiMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS y MAIL NG ADDRESS Z S. CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER �15 77d-37�o NAME 1 ADDRESS 01 15 f- iiYF S. SfG_ z UMBER NAME — ADDRESS CITY ZIP I TELEPHONE NUMBER Legal Description of Property - include all easements (show below or attach two copies)I o I a W J Tax Account Parcel No. IVI VN I I NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADD/ALTER COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL REPAIR APT. BLDG. SIGN EXCAVATE. F�DEMOLISH OR GRADE FIL PENCE x _FT) CARPORT SWIM REMODEL GARAGE POOL WOO INSERT D ROCKERY RETAINING WALL/ ❑ .RENEWAL L (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: L � I Lh NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING f u UNITS j DONEE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) NATURE OF WORK TO BEE-- �-SI 14w / F, T R LE- E T FILE USE PERMIT ZONE NUMBER JOB SUITE/APT # ADDRESS U1O,,C1E7C1K ©ZI J , / .EGAL DESCRIPSUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. IV 16,1 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP APPROVED BY EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED Z RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED w STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED) Z SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEW BY i REMARKS N'G SUPPLY SIZE FIXTURE UNITS cr REMARKS 3 SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB NO. ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT SHORELINE W VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE SETBACKS — FEET HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE i FRONT SIDE REAR z REMARKS a CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT N g ZS SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPAN Y OCCUPANT REQUIRED GROUP LOAD OYES ❑ NO REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 i FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION iFEE PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING CDs PLUMBING Plan Check No. r„ MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADING/FILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days I Permit Limit: 1 Year- Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and U) J successors in interest, agrees to Indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, M IX employees, and agents from any anl,d all claims for damages of s whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the issuance PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT 0 of this permit. Issuance of, this permit shall not be deemed to o modify,, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance x nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." I TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- THIS PERMIT ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLYTHE Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED tion.Insurance. SIG NA RE (OWNER OR AGENT) DATE SI ED INSPECTION DEPARTMENT 9 90 CITY OF EDMONDS ATTENTION CALL FOR IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPYi A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE INSPECTION UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771-3202 A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 'HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. / 02.87 1 - Zoo.00 l l zS("(, APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE DATE RELEASED BY: DATE 0 D m ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector U PINK — Owner ' GOLD — Assessor` OFD 8 co rn G�N7o � .i Z Z mz G) M.; L () N � m mN rn D -mi �Tu Z v 6i D� Z Nm -N mn 9 Om �v LA Am z ;. �° NUD 7" E Sq 1.30' (GALL.) OEo ZmDO, Z:M>(D 0 -nmAO nAZA �-iT-M 46, : ;.' Nmm M Dm LAA N 3 Q =ON�N; G 00 VIC) (1)-1> ( r DN , 33 MI �c�•. z ,W Arm6 -----+------ m c > m io A0 /DD!nD: �r N M r O F Z3 Z3-100 q--Im0� (- \ m D O m= c p -_ N O 2.- O m O D m m mO Z O M 0i m 1a C "1 A 7p z0m=izm� Nmz=0 > = D m zirDim�(AXm-i L o zzZ f \ 060ZAm-q04C•-jX, �N�Wi'"0-�i m N z�WmnizDr-0 0)- 4.�i �'N NmOmm0 oO m m0pm C� 4 Z:wmN0MmmN'_�ZNr-�O ANmE-IUD-mfi�COO��rn -� nONmm.�DJmcO-I<T— Z:� 0 �m�mWEmOTL--•I(Am�mN �� Z 4 mONM > knmjD O m zO 0 JmzmmW-Itn a 0 -� D 0-n92NAp-TI =LO pCS N z RM() 0m=mng=-�m70 =AO-a�mnmm=<Nmmm- mp-ci=�Rm, �()(w�1z �-+Omm "��D•Di 'I= -IC O.G�- _D c D z p-n m< N D m�OZ7paczmQ70- ntpm�m �Om0 pDT,4m TmrA Cb� 118442 0V o � N 68 °S4 / v�, S s s4!�T \ 0/0 moo' - \ tZ=l04.0��001, V- — /8 FD. nwd- Mw iiV CASE ow CORlVE,e GOV'r GOT 1 11:10. c©NC . 1 i 9 1EA57". 5,590/0'p4,�E 1/50./ I 1 I I 0� 30l.05' G.�LC. /550. ZQ M� y0& /< 4y � r /'o ILI ' GRAPHIC SCALE CONTOUR W rER I/A L e ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Beginning at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 1, Section 18, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; THENCE East on the South line of said Lot 1, 301.1 feet; / _ THENCE North 1001137" East 590.64 feet to the true point of beginning; THENCE North 88115'20" West 50 feet; THENCE North 14042110" West 100 feet; / 1 THENCE North 43008150" West 161.09 feet; / THENCE South 68057'30"'1�6t 110.61 feet; I THENCE through an arc of curve to left having a radius of 60 feet for 84.5 feet; / THENCE North 30020140" East 75.42 feet; THENCE through an arc of curve'to right, with a radius of 50 feet, for 56.5 feet; ( HENCE South 84°54'50" East 13.7 feet; { ( `,: THENCE through an arc of curve to right, with a radius of 190 feet for 105.49 feet; ( (� THENCE South 36033' West 308,13 feet to point of beginning; EXCEPTING therefrom all that portion lying Northeasterly of a line drawn at right angles ' from the Easterly line of aforesaid tract from a point which is North 36033, East 120 feet from the true point of beginning of above tract. TOGETHER WITH an e3--'�t for a roadmAy over and across a strip of land lying Easterly of a line which is parallel to and distant 15 feet Westerly of the Westerly line of the tract above described. TOP SANITARY SEWER IWANtfOL E ASSUMED ELEV. = /00.00 PkQlo e'0 AUG 231990 PERNIT COUNTER FO CONC. MOW. IN CASE Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. Cr ��'• "< Bata`.:` `'.�" TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ( PARTIAL) .1(' 1990 FOR APR IN NW %4, NW%,SECTION 187T.27 N,,R.4 E,,W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY , WASHINGTON ID ReVIGGO 0OUK IOARY 3-30-90 KM TO qfo to 00j AUG PERAll't