00017Edmonds Planning Commission - Page 2 - June 19, 1974
consists of impactYeonastorm drainagesand
wouldgravel
minimalmixture
amounth
some loam. P
of drainage added to the present system. Trees consist of
approximately 50% small alders, 50% second growth ever,
tos at
approximately 6 to 12 inches in diameter. Forty percent
fifty percent will be removed for road•and building area.
diameter of trees to remain will be 6" or larger. Ground cover
is mosed`llandscaping7is a£smal.luamountoofhtiers
racing utilizing
Propose
rockery anticipated for grade separation between lots. There is
P
single-family development in all directions around this development.
The estimated increase in auto trips daily would be 48 and
estimated demand for
onblic adjacentspstreets nwould dbeesmall 12 aincrease
The degreeere wa
to 184th Sthe tree �u tong restrictions.ic View Drive.ThMr. Wallis nstatedithatslon
regarding ��
it would be 6 at the request of the applicant. turtheaattentionllis ed
there was one other item he would like to bring
of the Commtreetnstandardsstated
andthat
askedthe
tostaff
reviewscopiesmofdarticles
review of
showing varsaandndravings bythe anthedstaffeshocringrvariationsefor�1e
the article
street standards, stating that while this is no twith feasible
eas blelats
this time for this particular subdivision,
thatremaining to be developed in t.3 Cltyof mentEclmThere wasgeneral
if
need to be explored for street eve op
width of streets under the new concept
discussion regarding the
disc
and ssionwhether they would be adequat-, for fire equipment access.
that he would like to
>
Mr. Wallis answered questions stating
the street standards to the council,
i
recommend some changes to
would like direction from the Commission as to their
and
beingeheardion
agreement or disagreementot�thethe
applicationvariations.
was asked how this relates
stated that during discussion with Mr. Thuesen some
taking the
r
,
Mr. Wallis
time -earlier lie proposed that instead of Mr.. Thuesen
the
he xstate-d
thalore
standard culdesac turnasacnd�Mr. Wallisthat
t Mr.'
r
of an alternative culde but would like to
approval of the standard culdesac,
is,seeking stated that at
pursue this one. Mr. Wallis furtherto take this point
r a
to tculdesache landoget
;
he felt it would be advisable reflecttthis
a standard that Wallis said that
'
review of
an indication from the council of approval. Mr.
the Cit. neer have
at the present time the City
to what fa ilitiesraredrequired.yonnaiculdesac.
i
some latitude as
Mr. Wallis stated that whether this relates to the particular
to our
Y
f
plat is that it is a good example to apply an alternative
the fact that it is before us and
present street standards, and
case, he would like to pursue it as far as the council
standards.
is a real
is concerned to see whether we can alter our street
the engineering
'{
Mr. Allen, Assistant City Engineer, revie�•�ed
roblems isthat
that there are none
`
<,
requirements stating
the layout of the property, factorshelpointed out
t.
there is no storm drainage syetemAddinndonethetamountlofthomes
to Olympic View Drive. g might,
4,
way down
in the development there is the possibilitrestri.ctrainage
s on
be contained within the site with
which would rei�cetheedrainageimactoweredcarriedroff
development
Mr. Allen stated that if a re
be sAndovernStreetlislan
Andover Street there would not oil
to handle that load. In addition, on it,
fmainace
�
snotchaooldl1addato the rd
coated street and tenance problems
ofo
and the increase g, I Allen stated
there and condition of the steetsurhecsees with the layout as
that these are the only two problems