00693•
W
0
a
�+1
THESE MINUTES SUBJECT
TO NOVEMBER 24 APPROVAL
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES .
November 17, 1981
i
The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:55 p.m: by
Mayor Harve Harrison in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center. All present
joined in the flag salute.
PRESENT STAFF'PRESENT
Harve Harrison, Mayor Irene Varney Moran, City Clerk
Larry Naughten Mary Lou Block, Planning Director
John Nordquist Jim Jessel, Parks & Recreation Director
Mary Goetz Ron Schirman, Assistant Fire Chief
Bill Kasper Dan Prinz, Assistant Police Chief
Katherine Allen Pat Wilson, Assistant City Engineer
-Jo-Anne Jaech Mark Eames, City Attorney
Ray Gould Jim Murphy, City Attorney
Marc Gluth, Student Rep. Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk
CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION: Item (B) was removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER GOULD MOVED, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED.
The approved items on the Consent Agenda included the following:
(A) Roll call.
(C) Acknowledgment of receipt of Claims for Damages from James Bride in the
amount of $42.26 and from Robert V. Hovey in the amount of $1,437.94.
(D) Authorization to execute Supplement #1 to Agreement GC6514 (SR 524).
APPROVAL OF MINUTES NOVEMBER 10, 1981 Item (B) on Consent Agenda]
Councilmember Naughten thought there had been an omission from the minutes regarding
the budget, but the item had been discussed in the budget work session prior to the
regular meeting, for which there were no minutes. He therefore stated at this time
that during the budget work session the Council had discussed the possibility of each
Councilmember taking on a particular part of the budget and following it during the
F year. He said the general consensus was that there was not time to do that now but
MOTION: after the first of the year they would. COUNCILMEMBER GOULD MOVED, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER NAUGHTEN, TO APPROVE ITEM (B) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED.
the -applicant hadrequested a two-year
extension on the approval of this PRO which was granted July 30, 1979. She said the
Code requires that a PRD is considered abandoned if the project has not been completed
at the end of two years from the adoption of the ordinance of approval. The applicant
applied for an extension on July 8, 1981. The application had gone to the Hearing
Examiner who recommended approval of the application after having two hearings on the
matter. The reason the PRD had not been completed was because of extensive litigation
involving the PRD, resulting in the applicant's being limited as to the amount of
work which could be accomplished on the property. The applicant had indicated the
project was held up in litigation for 14 months. Ms. Block read aloud the Hearing
Examiner's conclusions and displayed a site map of the PRD. City Attorney Mark Eames
stated that the litigation involving this project was now terminated. The hearing
was opened.
Jack Strother, attorney for the owner/applicant, stated that those present to represent
the applicant were Webb Reed, representative of the owner; Bob Hovde, builder; and
David Kinderfather, architect for the project. Mr. Strother stated that although
this was listed on the agenda as a change, there actually was no change to the project,
but the term "change" was a technicality of the Edmonds Community Development Code.
He said there were no changes at all in the design of the project and.they were only