01437./
1
-:.. �.
-.
+ .
�dJ d� t ./
i 1 H 1 V �,
,:
r ;.r
;.
;�
,:
�S
�. r _._.. __...... _. .. _ .. ,, ._. . - ...
?� �
• Yes Maybe No
nui�iburs of any species of fauna (birds, land '
animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish,
henthic ��rganisms, insects or micro -fauna)? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
��>'-
rare or endangered species of fauna? X
;�-•
`:'
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna
i�;`
into an area, or result in a barrier to the
i �t:��
migration or movement of faunal X
��� .
1••
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or
r
wildlife habitat? X
�,''
i
ExNl,,rrat icon: The existing native wildlife on this site�including
>�
�`
•
common squirrels and other native small animals and birds will be dis-
s
..
placed and more than likely will relocate in the same area. Domestic
�„�•
•
,pets can be expected with the development and may present a migratory
i,=
barrier and limit the rebuffldinq,of existing native wildlife habitat.
�'`
• �
�
'�
_
,''
i
(G)
:Noise. Will the proposal increase existing
1 �.,
�..
noise levels? X -
� ,;; .
-
� �": •
Explanation:- Construction noise levels will be intermittently high
�,;
i
during construction. Ambient noise levels vYill increase due to
� `;'
•residential traffic. �
��
t�'
1 t;
.
�
� �5>•
(7)
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
new 1 fight or glare? X
;.1�.
Explanation: •• Glow from interior li4htina and headlight glare will
�}•°�
,�
result from this development.
i.
'��
(8)
Land Use. Will the proposal result in the
i
r
alteration of the present or planned land use
of an area? X
`
(
f,
�
.
Explanation: The current zoning in RS 12 and the proposal will be
4'
`��
i!i
developed to utilize the pe►-mitted densities by the above mentioned
�
i
i
zoning with limitations being imposed by setbacks from the bank areas.
•
1'
,:
i
�::
���
,; ;.
..
.., �
,:, - r