02109f Memo to Board of nujustment
"{ Page 2 - September 19, 1978
fl
V-65-78 CHRIST114E DURST - Variance from definition of rear, front, and
side yards at 7831 238th St, S.W.(RS-8 ) - RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR
�. THE FOLLOWING REASONS: ,
1. It will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
! welfare because adequate buffered area is provided between
l the existing homes and the proposed home.
2. It' will allow for a mare adr:.quate building area, 55' x 1251,
t
thus allowing for the construction of a single story home.,
! similar to those existing in the neighborhood.
3. The revised setbacks will provide the needed area to keep
cars parked on the property out of the right-of-way.
4 Proposed setbacks will be front yard (east) - 50'; rear yard
(west) - 611; sideyards (north 8 south) - 71' each.
V-67-78 CLIFFORD CAMERON - Variance from required rear yard setback at
8912 192nd Street S.W. (RS-12) - RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THE
FOLLOWING REASONS:.
1. The new additions will not invade the setback anymore.than
the existing house.
2. It will not create a traffic hazard or obstruct construction
{ views in the area.
3. It is a minimum variance to make the most reasonable use of,
1 - the property.
{
V-70-78 PAUL & SHERRY.ZANE - Variance from required rear yard and front'
yard setbacks at the southwest corner of Puget Lane and 8th Avenue
North. (RS-12) - RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
1 The.variance will not be detrimental to adjoining property
{ owners -since the setbacks•wil) be consistent with those
properties.
<�!2. It will provide for the most reasonable use of the land by
allowing the applicant to construct'a home best suited to
this lot.
3. The propose) setbacks will not cause a site problem or a
safety hazard for neighboring lots sti.nce it will meet the
accepted setbacks for the street.
J IM NICHOf S Variance from streets standards':: at approx1matei y
:17340' Cyrus P I a'ce RECOMMEND T RL1 O6 DEN' , THE LOWI 'FOLNG
REASONS..
1. It will create a hazard to the public health, safety, 8 welfare
by not providing adequate access for the fire vehicles.
2. Because 2 lots have access to the easement. Engineering
requires a 20' access easement 8 a 5' utility easement.
3. Engineering also requires an on site turn around.
4. There is sufficient property in other ownerships1to bring
the easement up to City standards. It would then be possible
to serve more lot, others of which are also land locked.