02131I
I
1
1
1
PLANNER'S VARIANCE REVIEW FORM FILE # V-9 9- 1 °1
APPLICANT: gvLauf Gus +M�sb",
ADDRESS: 1�21C re is „Ql&.ce ZONING: RS•10
VARIANCE REQUESTED: ihybatt, (M,ia1tiH l,m,;4" }'0 33� tt'
ZONING CODE REQUIREMENT: �,o,,,�i w„�•,,. ?,p'.
OTHER PERTINENT FACTS: pmblpw, is ca��scd bu G vr►�_4le.d Mr►to�suriins %.i4k+.
kA i44 wexe. w.eo,t wr ed er. 6a�� s e� ar s i fie. ae 4v�o, Uy
coyertA 44, a Set. �tho►c.he.d ske.%c�.
VARIANCE CRITERIA - Section 12.16.100
1. Does this amount to a rezone? /(/o.
2.(a) Are there conditions and/or circumstances not generally applicable to other
lands in the same district? It S . #PvJC 1*C4,t7 Oh. VIA CeS AV$& Gsrw.-
eL bttii t .t.r.w r t Ow r\ a SI o,Ded bar
(b) Would strict enforcement of the zoning code deprive the property owner of rights
4LL commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district? i�J ov,.W al/ohi
w0 Ar4 koust- WkLt:k It hip ei-! oIP rw.A
3. Do the special conditions result from the actions of the applicant?
4.
Are there unnecessary
hardships and practical difficulties in carrying out the
(
provisions of the
zoning code? Yfs 010-100 %"-�A rt/0M,Friy. er
'Pe GO K i+vn L4"► v,, of
�,ov+se
5.
Will the granting of
the variance be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare
of property owners in
the vicinity? R!e
t
6.
Is this the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of land?
YES
}4
3
f
7.
Will the granting of
the variance generally be in harmony and compatible with this
zoning code?��
E
x
S get
k
.,1
Planner's Variance Review 12/77
L` L"