02301PLANNER'S VARIANCE REVIEW FORM FILE # . V•fo4-
APPLICANT: 4 PMA-r( C-k,-.
ADDRESS: IS 17riikwood ZONING:
VARIANCE REQUESTED: edJAL*. Ar+i SgJ*otck 4a /,6 en At .2 ' brf CAS¢i
SoI4-k
ZONING CODE REQUIREt4ENT: 2 5 ' j=ror+ se+bowk.
t
OTHER PERTINENT FACTS Lof rvi !I �Ccoh,� Gu rhty !.o f ��fe,• saroou, sped .%be��.r.rfiwa,
JAS+ Vgaf Mlt �Syw wt.W MCIA ( vww %y% Ili owiVt.W ) aw.al Sah�h
MOO
/J^L r� ai eo1 by dhtd,'ti fi'o►, o f '!' +� << &� j
VARIANCE CRITERIA - S ction 12.16.100 j
1. Does this amount t a rezone? �d•
2.(a) Are there conditions and/or circumstances not generally applicable to other
lands in the sae district? IQC.A4n'ey. erl fe,•Sf+n1T "94Xf. fie/
r' wa
(b) Would strict enforcement of the zoning code deprive the property owner of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district? New rnaa/
O&AA fie. b�1- or aA.eE 49',4r I
3. JDo the special conditions result from the actions of the applicant?
GO�t4f- •OJO%J oV&U bt t W An fucf: _ o.,•A,'hw ��c.�
b .aC k.e A-R dr i vtst:! A4 I
4. Are there unnecessary hardships and practical difficulties in carrying out the
.provisions of the zoning code? w,&..d d dA* r &. A &&^-t fir. P-12.02% 4
5. Will the granting of the variance be detrimental. to the health, safety, or welfare
Of. property owners in the vicinity? No.
6. Is this the minimm variance that will make possible the reasonable use of iana-:
yPs .
1. Will the granting of the variance generally be in harmony and compatible with this
zoning code? yk c.
Planner's Variance Review 12/77