02417VARIANCES
Hearing A 1.
File # ✓���%� 76 Date 7 --z- By
Appl. For ✓c_tt .0yZ .sMca,K ned /�5 —�o
RECOMMENDED
%Applicant present? � pprove (/ Close Public Hearing
resentation by Planner Deny 'Discussion by Board
Questions by Board Reasons for Board Action
Applicant comments clearly indicated?
Questions by Board/Staff Review Reasons/Restrictions
-Open Public Hearing
O . K • NOT
• a • aYV1
O.K. O.K.
Rezoning? Was he previously aware?
S ecial cond. exist? s exist? Hurt adjoin, property?
Special cirIn'.ur neighborhood?
_size? _shape In'urious to Edmonds?
topog, location Sight/View obstructions?
Hardships exist? Physical hazards?.
Practical -difficulties? Profit/Value a motive?
lApplicant.being deprived? Is this a minimum?
Any caused by applicant?
Motion
Made ei��J
Seconded
By By
r
to pprove Denny/Continue until , File # V—/4l - 76
BECAUSE: ZItf(does ( meet the criteria in section 12.16.100
zoning
code. .t (does) (does not) appear to be the minimum variance
that would provide this applicant the same rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties under similar
xcircumsta
V It +rs7'' is no detrimental to the public health,
morals, a eneral welfare.
h
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDIT ONS:
I v"Height ,D
Setbacks
Lot coverage
} Relocate
Screening/Landscaping Wltd k�-�4e °T'/-vse.K•
Time limits
Others .... �,r k, -