04.17.2015-email to Roseall Olson re property dispute.pdf
From:McConnell, Jeanie
To:"r o"
Cc:Conrad, Sean;Lien, Kernen
Subject:RE: To summarize Margaret Henson land grab from Rosella Olson
Date:Monday, April 20, 2015 12:27:24 PM
Hello Rosella,
I have reviewed the information you provided to me via email on March 13, 2015 and by mail on
March 31, 2015 related to your property ownership concerns between your property and Hensons
to the south. For info, I also forwarded the email you sent to Sean Conrad in our Planning Division.
You mention below that a building permit is currently under review by the City, but that is not the
case. The Engineering Division is currently completing review of the civil construction plans for the
Henson subdivision, file number PLN20080014. The proposal includes access to the proposed back
lot along the south side of Henson property, not along the north side of the lot adjacent to your
property. Preliminary approval for the short plat was issued April 7, 2009. Through passing of
Ordinance 3925 by City Council, the validity of several short plats were extended from 5 years to 7
years. The subject Henson short plat expires April 9, 2016, which means the short plat needs to be
recorded by this date or it will expire. No new applications have been received by the City, the
existing short plat is still valid.
In reading through the preliminary approval for the subdivision, it was noted that the surveyor
stated the recreation easement had been relinquished. The recreation easement is the disputed
area you discuss. The Planning staff reviewer at the time, Gina Coccia, noted in the report “… it
seems as though it would be in both parties’ interest to clear this up by recording a document with
the County that once and for all revokes/relinquishes the previously recorded recreation
easement.” This is not stated to be required as a condition of subdivision approval.
City Planning staff will review the title report for the Henson short plat and proposed legal
descriptions when the final plat is submitted to the City for review.
Regards,
Jeanie McConnell
From: r o \[mailto:shobiz2001@hotmail.com\]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 11:29 AM
To: McConnell, Jeanie
Subject: FW: To summarize Margaret Henson land grab from Rosella Olson
Hi Jeanie:
Thanks for responding to my complaint against Margaret Henson's application to build a
house next door to me.
To summarize, in 2008 Henson filed fraudulent documents with Snohomish County; Quick
Claim Deed which neither I gave her permission, authorization or had any knowledge of until
after she had filed this document (I found it filed on the County's internet site) in order to
attempt to fraudulently obtain an easement on my property for the purpose of building a
road on my property to her back property where she was planning to build a house for sale.
This fraudulent Quit Claim Deed was falsely Notarized by Michael Patrick Mulligan in Ken, WA
dated 01/11/08.
Henson's original survey in 2008, Western Engineers, was not signed by the surveyor. I have a
witness that he was shown the original markers on Henson's property which were not
reflected in their survey. How could he sign a false document? My survey company PACE
ENGINEERS are highly respected and have performed many surveys for the County. They
found all the original markers from my block in the HANDBURY'S SOUND VIEW TRACTS.
On April 28th, 2008 my attorney, Rebecca K Wiess response to Ms. Henson is in the
documents I emailed you. She stated "Very recently, my client discovered that you had
recorded an Easement under Snohomish County recording number 200802010378. Please be
advised that my client has made no agreement with you, was not informed your were
recording such document, and hereby refuses delivery of the Easement".
Ms. Wiess goes on to say, "My client and her parents have owned and occupied the property
at 23904 since 1955. The boundary between her property and yours has never been
questioned prior to your recent survey. Regardless of the survey results or accuracy, title to
the land claimed by my client was long ago established by both adverse possession and the
common grantor rule. Ms. Olson will vigorously defend all of the land which has historically
been part or her property".
I am asking you to deny Margot Henson's building permit under the premise that she filed
fraudulent documents in 2008 with Snohomish County; The Quit Claim Deed, the Notarized
document upholding the fraudulent Quit Claim Deed and the false Survey. When you The
Planning Commission, grant a permit, I'm sure it means that the grantee will have to proceed
in a legal and honest manner. This is not the case with Henson.
Thanks so much for your time and effort,
Rosella Olson