09.17.10-bld20080287-revision-e-mail.htm
MessagePage of
??
From: McConnell, Jeanie
Sent:
Friday, September 17, 2010 9:31 AM
To:
'warrenlafon@earthlink.net'
Cc:
Umbaugh, Theresa
Subject:
RE: FW: Jantz revision
Warren,
The plan the City approved under bld20080287 shows the detention system further north than what is shown on
the plans submitted with the current revision. Assuming that the location of the detention pipe is "asbuilt" then one of
?
two things occurred. Either the large diameter pipe was reduced in length or the piping to the south of the large
diameter pipe was reduced in length. My understanding is that the pipe to the south of the larger pipe is still a part of
the detention system and not just conveyance pipe.
Clearly indicate what portions of the overall detention system are being revised or have been revised. Indicate pipe size
(length & diameter) for the entire detention system so capacity of the entire system can be verified. After receiving this
information it will be determined if additional drainage calculations are needed.
FYI what I recall from my discussions with Rob Michel at the front counter is that the north SDMH was in conflict with a
?
portion of the building/foundation. As a potential fix, the SDMH could be shifted to the south and another section of pipe
and another manhole would be installed to account for the reduction in pipe.
Please let me know if you have any other questions.
Thank you,
Jeanie
-----Original Message-----
From: Warren LaFon \[mailto:warrenlafon@earthlink.net\]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 4:22 PM
To: McConnell, Jeanie
Subject: Re: FW: Jantz revision
JEANIE,
THE PLAN INDICATES WHAT YOU AND ROB MICHEL AGREED TO ON SITE. THIS
WASRELAYED TO ME FROM ROB. NO PIPE WAS SHORTENED WHICH RESULTED IN
MORE CAPACITY IN THE SYSTEM.
THANK YOU
WARREN LA FON
THE PLAN NOW REFLECTS THE SANITARY SEWER ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
PROPERTY NOT ON THE EAST AS THE ORIGINAL PLANS SHOW.
On 9/16/20102:25 PM, McConnell, Jeanie wrote:
Warren,
I still haven't received a response to the attached plan comments. Please submit revised
documents as required so Engineering can continue review of the project.
Thank you,
Jeanie
-----Original Message-----
From: McConnell, Jeanie
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 1:27 PM
file:///C:/Users/mcadmin/AppData/Local/Temp/09.17.10bld20080287revisionmail.ht...7/13/2017
?????
MessagePage of
??
To: 'warrenlafon@earthlink.net
?
Subject: Jantz revision
Warren,
Please find attached comments from the Engineering division in review of the Jantz building
revision.
Regards,
Jeanie
JEANIE McCONNELL | Engineering Program Manager | mcconnell@ci.edmonds.wa.us
th
Public Works Department ê Engineering Division | 121 5 Ave N | Edmonds, WA98020
City of Edmonds | www.ci.edmonds.wa.us | Tel: 425.771.0220 | Fax: 425.771.0221
Please consider the environment before printing this email
??
file:///C:/Users/mcadmin/AppData/Local/Temp/09.17.10bld20080287revisionmail.ht...7/13/2017
?????