Loading...
100 DAYTON ST.pdfso i 0 EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF EDMONDS HEARING EXAMINER APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE DATE FEE RECT APO'S HEARING DATE 2�I71 APPLICANT City of Fdmnnd,, ADDRESS 250-5th Ave. N. CITY & ZIP Edmonds, WA 98020 PHONE 771-3202 INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY Owner OWNER ADDRESS PHONE LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY 100 Dayton Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Sep Attarhad ' To be completed by the Planning Division: Use Zone p„hl;r/Rnl Legal description checked and approved by: Date: CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED: CU for Secondary Se_w�gP TrP�tmPnt plant DETAILS OF PROPOSED USAGE: See Attached Declarations gnature of Applicant,r'ner or Representative Release/Hold Harmless Ac7reement The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from any action or inaction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. Permission to Enter Subject Property The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. Signature of Applicant, Owner or Representative ,�' .1' /r+• ..e .,..,..o,u.,.�.w..':..rLE. i....e.... _....._..�.: .,. _. �F .. .. ... .. .... ....s _�.�, w:i� �. .,..�,. .�.....r. ..._,, f y�wf—5.....w..SkSY( ' I `'!. DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT Please answer all questions 1. What are the physical characteristics, (i.e. topography, shape of lot, etc.) which create a hardship for you in regard to development of your property? The subject property is bounded on three sides by streets and on the fourth by a wetland area. 2. How does your property differ from other property in the same vicinity? See Item #1 ,5 3. Will this variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to other property or improvements in the vicinity? No. The Treatment Plant will be landscaped and designed to fit into the neighborhood. i. 4. What hardships will result to you if the variance is not granted? 1'. Will these hardships have been caused by your own action? In order to comply with all mitigating environmental conditions and to physically construct the treatment plant to meet required State standards, the site must be i' developed as proposed. If the variances are not granted, the plant cannot be j built. 5. Can you make reasonable use of your property without the variance? No —."';—;,,.?_,�++;.a.:.,�s�j�rsr..ht�Y..�::a...:.a,..�..,a.,......s�....-.....,:.ar.v.J..,.....a.—.....W,.'..i...s......s..c,...lr_.,..x...,.....w.,......,.....<._...E....._....>�.e..,�,._...�..,<.,..��...�..w'?.�&. ^,�;.�ci.ust-x9wr.cz... CWC-HDR, Inc. Suite 204 Telephone Water Resources An HDR Infrastructure 300 Admiral Way 206 774-1947 Wastewater Company Edmonds, Washington Industrial 98020-4127 Hazardous Waste November 12, 1987 Mr. James M. Driscoll Hearing Examiner CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5th Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: City of Edmonds Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Dear Mr. Driscoll: The City of Edmonds plans to construct a secondary wastewater treatment plant at the intersection of Dayton Street and State Route 104. The site is occupied by the City's primary wastewater treatment plant and the Public Works Department's storage yard. This letter transmits information to support the City's application for a conditional use permit and request for setback variances. It also attempts to clarify a few issues that may be of concern. ✓✓� Enclosed are three copies of the following documents: ✓✓� A. A color aerial photograph shows surrounding land uses. The plant ' ✓� site is located near the middle of the photograph at the southeast corner of Dayton Street and State Route 104. B. A topographic map of the existing site shows present ground elevations and existing facilities. C. A site plan shows how the secondary wastewater treatment plant will appear on the surface. D. A location plan defines the locations of all significant above grade and below grade structures and identifies setbacks from the property lines. E. A predesign report provides a detailed description of the function, design and aesthetic treatment of the treatment plant facilities. Differences Between Current Site Plan and Predesign Report Since completion of the Predesign Report, a few modifications have been made to the treatment plant design which are incorporated in the current site plan. The shape of the Operations Control Building has changed. This structure has also been moved about 30 feet to the south to provide better access between it and the Solids Process Building. ■ James Driscoll NovemUer I1, 1987 Page -2- �'�€ An access tunnel has Ueen added along the west edge of the site between the aeration Uasin/primary clarifier structures and the property line. � Electrical supply facilities have been added along the east edge of the site Uetween the final clarifier and the property line. This creates a need to construct a Uarrier (security) wall along the east property line for approximately 105 feet. ' Architectural Treatment of Dayton Street Frontage A plaza area will be constructed along the street front on Dayton Street. The site plan shows the proposed concept for this area, however, this plan is still somewhat preliminary in nature. CWC-HDR is working closely with several groups including the Architectural Design Board, the Citizens Advisory Committee and the Edmonds Arts Commission to finalize plans for this area. These groups are also providing input on other architectural, landscaping and aesthetic issues associated with the plant. Landscaping Landscaping will vary across the plant. On the north end, formal flower landscaping. will be incorporated into the plaza design. Along the east and west property lines, green slopes and plantings will Ue used along structures and the perimeter .wall to soften the appearance of these facilities. On the south end of the site, plantings will be installed that provide transition to the adjoining wetlands. This approach is consistent with the conditions set forth in the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. Building Heights The existing ground surface varies.. from elevation 13 to elevation 20. The mean elevation for the site is approximately elevation 16. Three. structures, the Solids Process Building, the Blower Building and the Influent Pumping Station, will have. a maximum elevation of 40 which is within the 25 foot height limit. The height of all other structures will Ue lower, as shown in the Predesign Report. Setbacks Construction of the Treatment Plant on the Dayton Street site requires maximum use of the availaUle area. When laying the plant out, efforts were taken to maintain all facilities within the City's normal setback requirements. Unfortunately economic .considerations, process design requirements and constraints of existing facilities made this impractical. Consequently, setback variances are requested along the north, east and west Uoundaries of the property. The requested setUacks are shown on the location plan. 4 rty C { t *• h, i V L .. v L � t br}�.:9.LLnv^wxuli 1 .'i l ytiY �i�.u�,syys�i iWu� ti•�s..+iaic3�tixwa.`ea:fdlri4.$:n4rYCE+- �, .+`sr� 1..ew�.._1r James Driscoll Page -3- November 11, 1987 All facilities on the south end of the plant are located more than 35 feet from the edge of the wetlands as stipulated in the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. Other Mitigating Conditions The Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant will comply with all other mitigating conditions set forth in the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. Very truly yours, Bruce R. Willey Assistant Project Manager BRW:ko CC: Peter Hahn Bob Alberts Mary Lou Block Gordon Culp Bud Ben jes I EXHIBIT 3 V-33-87 & CU-68=87 VICINITY MAP 4 NORTH Toil Ferry fo k DS S ""µ "''° �1,—_ ri• = UNION OIL OIL t+ ON :iiiiiiii: B .........i :iii? ii ei EDMONDS NDERWATER Re Q' eF44 rL=p P S � psT.l JPMEg h Depot 1 DAYTON N W < 0 w ST < y r PUBLIC a o WON w w > v z < a ALDER ST l � F- m Y 'e RTH STRFq� Pond c° ri MELODY LN {Pond 2 HINC rtle } I Z Ex z Q:0 < !. =dam U CASPER S7 GILTN L SATER ALOHA W ALOHA ST ORCI- w W W CAROL ROSAii 1� (D m JJ GLEN. ST CHURCH ra v � zI z DALEY PRAGL ST W SPRAGUE wir. High > �� = ST <Playrld < ® EDMONDS w ST Station T A BELL ST < S e MAIN n ST m rn m p ANDERSON CTR. LIBRARY < MAPLE ST (, 2 n ALDER < ST < = 2 G WALNUT" ST 3wb� D R CEDAR ST 1 J �f SPRUCE , HOM NO > '.I, ST w CITY DR < HEMLOCK > J. HEML K Wy ST PARK < % ERBE SEA L LAUREL LAURE'. %QT HOW —ELL ` r � t J rr e t_ Cr Y , ., r �; �,�� .ii � °�xh�;� it "1�i•+� �� _;tY .._-1.,_..� _.......... . ,�,.......<--......:+...�.u�..r ,...,�:�,.-e. N..i ... . .. Mt n iy} f lF �l L4M-]' . I r i i a a Ct yiA .•I i 1 v K a Y I I ' r'. •• .-3.�.�� �. ..1 �.. ..0 _. .. .rr r_.........c. s1Lu i. .va..�n .i.rz.n i.lo3.•t u3. .a .. Tu..�� .( .....r...•.3_mve ... _ • .��._ _...Lra. ..-^•^�.�' _. DAYTON STREET { t WATER FEATURE O - /C% EFFLUENT / \\ PUMPING STATION��---r---•W(:r` 7� �� PERGOLA F�%I I { CLEW. 27.E : Y� yi [ \ F.7j i t �Iw I I fy / i f/s I /C _r �ti r z > r 1 0 N. i r N > ti m ` Z 9 9 DLOWER BUILDING [LEW. L[ AERATION BASINS CLEW In I:r�• o I,Ifx _ > I1, 2 4 c > > n r rt r., n m ��I > 9 --— —— — — —— RAW SLUDGE ICI. PUMPING STATION I nv. u Ili ,s SOLIDS PROCESS BUILDING CLEW a[ li 1 I i Ij L r � i ' I OPERATIONS I CONTROL • I BUILDING I CLEW. is N n z z 0 r � z = 9 •C C i H = Ir z III z I I I 1 / I / MARSHLANDS pp ,. A tt. f m� «< to too I «` j. i J 14 1l5.74[ II'lS O4 t FINAL CLARIFIER z O U 2 w m l O � ct = n u �� JirDAGtaO fT.• � M7ls �. 9i17.1N +r 14D74.J2C 1007J.379 ll SITYCC:SfT. 1- i fY�7N sLraL<:oFr pIO.pLN Z041.60f1 y 1L2.62 E FINAL CLARIFIER RAS PUMPING STATION J44.22N �114.Bet FINAL CLARIFIER �I9f•/fN 71.11 f FT4LK: f.2Fr 5fT17ACC: •F•5fr--, lL4Cr10CAL. SfAwc.L LPu/PAIWr 745 21N /l !/D, 24i SECOND AVENUE SOUTH 7/4•B/N L76. B2N 59rUCF:3.7F 34; 1.31 Q SO&.BON �30B.p1 9476.00N cWGNDILY WA s 10.101.2 i [.k....+K 1N 4 307.79i 307.7 4F INFLUENT PUMPING STATION SO 7.4014 �274.W6 EDMONDS BN WASTEWATER 9 e� ?e7DAc1c; ZO FT ?Q/.pLN IREAr w 211.7.75E PT /4LDZ.77N /O,ZZ9.61 f PRIMARY CLARIFIER ________—__I . I 1 Z 1 W g 1 9603.94N 1 0 F J a J 1 W (7 PRIMARY CLARIFIER I 1 ¢ p I n i -----------•1--- PRIMARY CLARIFIER G2S0614 333. es 75.36 7.N 1/.L1i 60.IIi � 896 , , t f UVNGL -'11. SON &I.09N 1 L 1.76 IF SQTGCX:Ap•IAFf •JeTDACX: B.2rr ?LTDACK:I4.JfT' S LOCATION AND SETBACK - PLAN NND red or— 01Cr �.. N0VLN0LL 011TJ7 ray I EXHIBIT 7 { MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Construction of secondary wastewater treatment facilities at the present site of primary wastewater treatment facilities. Proponent City of Edmonds Location of proposal, including street address, if any southwest corner of Dayton Street and Second Avenue, 200 Dayton Street, Edmonds, WA. Lead agency City of Edmonds The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. �... xx This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by S� p Responsible official Mary Lou Block Position/title Manager, Planning Division Phone 771-3202 Address 250 Fifth Avenue N., Edmonds, WA 98020 Date Cl 1 n _ Signature X_You may appeal this determination of nonsignificance to James M Driscoll, Hearing Examiner at 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds, WA 98020 no later than 5:00 p.m., September 22, 1986 by filing a written appeal You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Mary Lou Block to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. There is no agency appeal. MITIGATING CONDITIONS SECONDARY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT FOR THE CITY EDMONDS 1. No structures shall be higher than 25' in height. 2. No structures shall be allowed within 33' (ten meters) of the marsh. 3. The entire -Treatment Plant site shall be screened by a buffer which is a combination of fencing and profuse evergreen landscaping. 4. The building and site development plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Design Board of the City of Edmonds. 5. A 33' (ten meter) natural landscape adjac ent marsh eThebuffer area buffer shall be between the plant and the a shall be supplemented as necessary by native vegetation, selected for its compatibility with wetland areas . 6. All mechanical equipment must be screened and baffled to comply with the City of Edmonds noise ordinance. 7. All truck traffic associated with the treatment plant shall use Dayton Street to SR 104. 8. The treatment plant shall use the latest state-of-the-art techniques for reducing odors associated with the plant such as, but not limited to, electrostatic scubbers, filters, etc. 9. No non-native fill will be used. 10. Any areas exposed during construction, which will not constitute part of the developed facility, will be revegetated upon completion of construction. 11. The plant shall comply with all State and Federal air quality standards. 12. Stormwater runoff shall be collected and conveyed to the existing City storm system, which drains into Puget Sound. There shall be no increase in Stormwater runoff into the marsh. 13. A conditional use permit will be required. i 'A ?� i e a' ,; C t '� i r 1 ., i •x.�4yi YA L (r x.l$ f .� P of Edmondi'-J Gary M. - Fire M. INTER -OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE , 'Bobby M. - PW, Dan Smith/Jerry Hauth - Engineering TO FROM Diane BQWI[lsln _ DATE I1�aO/_87 SUBJECT _ V-33-87 CU-68-87 .r !g. I— �;-/ VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED STREET SETBACKS PER ATTACHED SITE PLAN. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SECONDARY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT. HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1987 PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 8, 1987. THANKS. R�'xv PLgNP% DE'PT ..`:%CS`ivi.aY:.•+:L'Ja1.I�dmLi.N..13u—.cxW�ticJ.♦=.+.L.n+,elm......:!�'J •,u..... .+ .+. __..__ _ _. .... _... ity of Edmond. Gary M. - Fire ,M. INTER -OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Bobby M. - PW Dan Smith/Jerry Hauth - Engineering f TO FROM Dua.n-e—Bowman DATE ---LLLaOZ87 SUBJECT V-33-87 VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED STREET SETBACKS PER ATTACHED SITE PLAN. CU-68-87 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SECONDARY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT. HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1987 PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 8, 1987. THANKS. RECLIVED DEC 41987 �� ,�� /. jc°C '��S PLANWNG DEPTH CLJVED 87 j'Li19 :EDMONDS FIRE DEPT- iH r Mt,. ,: y ..+ � s ... -+... + �. _.. ,... �`.._.... ._ - . LF_.... ..-.,_.�5..�.w.��XAI'•W+ai:X, �'r"": + 4 (;�°�i t�/ of Edmond". ;; fy T INTER-OFFIC�EC ORRESPOWDENCE n 1987 Gary M. - Fire M. Bobby M. - PW EN031NEERING - Dan Smith/,Jerry Hauth - Engineering TO ci io icrT FROM DS.I_ me—B—o fman DATE 1J13Q�87_ _ _ V-33-87 VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED STREET SETBACKS PER ATTACHED SITE PLAN. CU-68-87 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SECONDARY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT. HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1987 PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 8, 1987. THANKS. ., a � 1 � . }�.p.g:• a ,tfv' ,.�'V Y ?,' .-+ . , , i .,}; t, ry 1, .,,r�.. St s"f5f"S,R�9"r'f t'+r"1'wki n�.r. t Rq'r1?YFtN'r«J4!+IY'S'llW!`"'.'s�tk '�Cti i � IS••j I I, I �•• ! Owl Resident .1. Edla Pederson or Resident 327 3rd, Ave. S. 1I 314 3rd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 ' IJ Edmonds, WA 98020 Beatrice Davis or Resident L. A. Hanke or Resident 317 3rd Ave.S . �aa I !i� � N • S . Preston or Resident 324 3rd Ave. S. #� i� 314 3rd Ave. S.� Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 i, Edmonds, WA 98020 Alan Lindberg or Resident M. L. Palace or Resident M. R. Ratigan 324 3rd Ave. S. 317 3rd Ave. S. */o/ 1: 314 3rd Ave. S.-,,,6�-6 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 z i K. Kittleson-Holidy/Resident H. E. TurnRror Resident ;i; Thula Stone 318 3rd Ave. S. • kl 317 3rd Ave. S.4f7'J03 f� 314 3rd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 i_.i Edmonds, WA 98020 M. L. Stovel or Resident Marc L. Venable or Resident ;i" Resident 3t8 3rd Ave. S. 317 3rd Ave. 233 3rd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 �t M. White or Resident Neil Warren or Resident Mrs. Bentler or Resident 318 3rd Ave. S. 3 317 3rd Ave. S. 016� :� 230 3rd Ave, S. #E Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 9802 j` Edmonds, WA 98020 Spencer Bronson or Resident John Hutchings or Resident 'ii Sigrid Cornstock or Reside 317 3rd Ave. S. 2 314 3rd Ave. S. �= 230 3rd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 ;ii Edmonds, WA 98020 Bert Dodd or Resident Clifford Lane or Resident G. M. Connelly or Resident 317 3rd Ave, S. 314 3rd Ave, S. i41/ 230 3rd Ave. S. L Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds., WA 98020 i , T if, J. W. Gibson or Resident i John Lincoln or Resident S. F. Cook or Resident 317 3rd Ave. S.-1k- 303 314 3rd Ave. S. -917 230 3rd Ave. S. # 7- Edmonds, WA 98020 ' Edmonds, WA 98020 " Edmonds, WA 98020 George McManus or Resident -; Reuben Hauan or Resddent 314 3rd Ave, S. , 230 3rd Ave. S. . �2- Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 ; ?.•:;t' 1 �'=s.,wur..�.:'^.y.._..waLl._...._ .i.. _ _,_..,. . _.... ,_u ,-- �.., ,.y.t..;.....,.�....._____=..:.i.:..:.............r..i.o��...yw...�:aJ...lw,.ti'.i:'.:..s.vs ....._ys__.. ., _.ti _ .�� ,, r..r..1vS,. �:i:. b. ._ n r } +f }5 j bavid'Jasper or Rgsidint Michael VanPelt or Resident B. E. Jones or Resident s 224 3rd .Ave . S . fir' 221 3rd Ave . S . #1C, 203 3rd Ave . S. Edmonds, WA, 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 a-4"1* Edmonds, WA 98020 4 • E. A. Nelson or Resident �. "i Ronald Bell or R sident �' Donald Megorden or Reside; 203 Ave. jr 224 3rd Ave. S. 210 3rd Ave. S.4 3rd S./D Edmonds,'WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020`'i' Edmonds, WA 98020 J. B. O'Neill or Resident 224 3rd Ave. S ! Erling Heide 210 3rd Ave. or Re i ent S. ,11 I't I John Cetanyan or Resident 217 Alder S..a05 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 I' Edmonds, WA 98020 I R. S. Tippery or Resident i Donald Williams or Res. John Dodge or Resident 224 3rd Ave. S. 210 3rd Ave. S. II ,.� 217 Alder St. 43o1 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 i Edmonds, WA 98020 S. A. Allen or Resident Charles Adkins or Resident Earl Garr or Resident 223 3rd Ave. S. 209 3rd Ave. S.-*-2— f;;? 16 217 Alder StJ20 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 i� Edmonds, WA Joel Hadfield or Resident Vernon Daley or Resident ; Paul Kavadas or Resident 223 3rd Ave. S. 209 3rd Ave. S. 217 Alder St. -#- 3 6 5 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 � Edmonds, WA 98020 Jeffrey Holtz or Resident ! G Foerster or Resident John Kiernan or Resddent ! 223 3rd Ave. S. 2- 209 3rd Ave. S.4L4 ,; 217 Alder St. #"doh ' Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 �; Edmonds, WA 98020 �< Catherine Miller ! George Hanson or Resident! R. E. Lewis or Resident 223 3rd Ave. S. 3 ! 209 3rd Ave. S. 217 Alder St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 B. J. Nelson Harry Deland or Resident S. K. Livingstone or Res. t 223 3rd.Ave. S.(o 203 3rd Ave. S. !; 217 Alder St. Edmonds, WA 98020 ;; I' j' Edmonds, WA 98020 (,' 0 Edmonds, WA 98020 `` Resident 1! Holger Hjalseth or Resident ► C. A. McConnachie or Res. 222 3rd Ave. S. ! 203 3rd Ave. S. �'.1 217 Alder St. +-a o3 �.. Edmonds, WA 98020 ! Edmonds, WA 98020 I:' Edmonds, WA 98020 1A, Sarah Bee or Resident ;, P. Hughes or Resident M. K. McCool or Resident 221 3rd Ave. S., #2 203 3rd Ave. S. L1; 217 Alder St. Edmonds, WA 98020 , Edmonds, WA 98020 ' Edmonds, WA 98020 t`. Eugetie Howard or esident G. F. Palmer or Resident John Lowe or Resident 230 3rd Ave. S .,� j y 217 Al der St . - Soy (;; 220 Al der St. # E.dmond's, VlA 98020 t` ( Edmonds., WA 98020Y'` f, Edmonds, WA 98020 Robert Johnson or Resident i Merle Petterson or Resident j!! N..B. Lyons or Resident 230 3rd Ave. S. i 217 Alder St. 1NO 3 �;,j 220 Alder St. � Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 ,, Edmonds, WA 98020 ., David Louttit or Resident 230 3rd Ave. S. 41'17 Edmonds, WA 98020 A. E. Markle or Resident 230 3rd Ave. S. #1> Edmonds, WA 98020 I . Burla Porter or Resident 230 3rd Ave, S. i Edmonds, WA 98020 j I .r E. A. Ritterbash or Residen�'- 230 3rd Ave. S. —7/--// Edmonds, WA 98020 i Mrs. Lewis Roll or Res. 230 3rd Ave. S. i Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 227 3rd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 225'3rd Ave. S Edmonds, WA 981 W. A. Rinderknecht or Res. !! 217 Alder St. # a,oL� Edmonds, WA 98020 [j Chris Savage or Resident 217 Alder St. Edmonds, WA 98020 John Station or Resident 217 Alder St, tk30� Edmonds, WA 98020 Eric Thuesen or Resident 217 Alder St, Edmonds, WA 98020 L. Wells or Res dent 217 Alder St. �1015' Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 219 Alder St. Edmonds, WA 98020 D. M. Bousman or Resident 220 Alder St, #�- 1 i Edmonds, WA 98020 j Arthur Finlon or Resident 222 Alder St. -f5 Edmonds, WA 98020 A Hareid or Resident 220 Alder St. AFC Edmonds, WA 98020 Malcom Morrison or Resid 220 Alder St. 4'? Edmonds, WA 98020 I. K. Eide or Resident 323 2nd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 "d M. E. Gardiner or Residei `323 2nd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 M. M. Holtrop or Resident 323 2nd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 J. Orr or Resident i�323 2nd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 i { ij ��� Resident iI 1 222 Dayton St. ji' Edmonds, WA 98020 G' jJ.Resident i'I226 Dayton St. Edmonds, WA 98020 THE M lu (o i5iDA %f 'a FILE NO. VISop PROPERTY ADDRESS AND LOCATION ZONE DISTRICT. mat WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING 1997 --, ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: 1 sow /_0w427 THE HEARING WILL BEGIN AT7 °0 M., IN THE PLAZA MEETING ROOM, LIBRARY BUILDING, 650 MAIN STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL, YOU MAY COME TO THE HEARING AND SPEAK. YOU MAY ALSO WRITE A LETTER STATING YOUR VIEWS WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LETTER TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND INCLUDE THE ABOVE FILE NUMBER. IF THE ITEM IS CONTINUED TO ANOTHER HEARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED, OR FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, THE DATE OF THE CONTINUED HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED ONLY AT THE MEETING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 250 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS (PHONE 771-3202, EXTENSION 252). THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION, OR WA mnmo" N 11h vAn Ago'CONCEALMENT OF THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE ® OF THE HEARING IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER .� IT7 � Y S �ft Ft�fry!&°fir, tb°: �2i�Sr• � �`i_ n r _..._..,_...,.s..�., w...u,..�.__.�..���.._.._ .�.. ... .., ..•_.z.»...��........°.esk..v...2.qw�.w.r,.v+,rx:�,'d..i....i..wwi�tywi..°,....mac'' iuo�wm:�i:«w tt:✓�a'!... ��...a•.:' � !{'.�.: 1 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) FILE NO. V-33-87 & CU-68-87 APPLICANT City of Edmonds Duane V. Rnwman being first.duly sworn, on oath, deposes and says: That on the 4th day of December 19 87 the attached Notice of' Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event, in the Frances Anderson Center and.Civic Center, and where applicable on or near the subject property. Signed Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of tary Public Noin and for the State°of Washington. Residing at,/�:: z MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 6-16-89. 1•.• :_ a t; 1 A FILE NO. V-33-87 & CU-68-87 APPLICANT City of Fdrnnnd,, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) Diane M. Cunningham being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: That on the 4th day of December ,19 87 the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed as required to adjacent property owners, the names of which were provided by the applicant. Signed tV1 Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of�o 19 �7 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. Residing at 2!L MY. COMMISSION EXPIRES 646,89. '_"^ �1. r�?^•`'eIb tier..��.`t*�,���� w ..�_,,.t;..,.hi.,.s,..iat�..:e.»'aw"�1 �:a:'� ,..s�':::.n>.�.a::t::,cS=.a:.t�<aee.�,>6Kr. w.,,a«......,�.yfa.��r.�,.�.i�...�.�s:Ja THIS PACKET SENT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ON 12/11/87 EXHIBIT LIST CiU-68-87 & V-33-87 EXHIBIT 1 - STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT 2 - APPLICATIONS & DECLARATIONS EXHIBIT 3 - VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT 4 EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 5 - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 6 - PROPOSED SITE PLAN WITH SETBACK LOCATIONS EXHIBIT 7 - MITIGATED DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE EXHIBIT 8 - PREDESIGN REPORT (OCTOBER 1987) EXHIBIT 9 - PHOTOGRAPHS ME EXHIBIT 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FILES: V-33-87 & CU-68-87 HEARING DATE: December 17, 1987 I. REQUESTED ACTION: Variances to reduce the required street setbacks for proposed secondary sewage treatment plant at 100 Dayton Street, Edmonds. Specifically, the City of Edmonds is seeking to reduce the required 25' street setback to a minimum of 0 feet on 2nd Ave. S.; 4.8 feet on Dayton Street; and .8 feet on SR 104. Conditional use permit for secondary sewage treatment plant at 100 Dayton Street, Edmonds. II. APPLICANT: City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 III. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit 2 IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: A. Description of the Subject Property and Surrounding Area The City of Edmonds is seeking a conditional use permit and variances to allow for the construction of a new secondary sewage treatment plant on the southeast corner of the intersection of SR 104 and Dayton Street. The site is the current location of the Edmonds sewage treatment Plant. The subject property is relatively level. It is bounded by 2nd Ave. S. on the east; Dayton Street to the north; and SR 104 to the west. The area to the south is undeveloped. The existing site conditions are shown on Exhibit 4. The proposed improvements are shown on Exhibit 5. The requested setback variances are depicted on Exhibit 6. Surrounding development is commercial to the west and north. The City Public Works building is located to east, across 2nd Ave. S. To the southeast, there is multifamily development. As noted above, the land immediately to the south is undeveloped. B. Official Street Map f Staff Report V-27-87 Page 2 Proposed R/W Existing R/W West - SR 104 175' 175' East - 2nd Ave. S. 60' 60' North - Dayton Street 60' 60' C. Conformance to Chapters 20.05.010 & 20.85.010 1. Special Circumstances Special circumstances do appear to exist in this particular case. There is limited space to build all the required improvements for the treatment plant. The proposed plan allows for passive recreation on the site with the development of a pedestrian park along Dayton Street. Further, all structures on the site with meet the building height limitation of 25 feet. ' 2. Special Privilege The proposed setback variances do not appear to represent a grant of special privilege. This is a significant public structure that has been designed to blend into the neighborhood. 3. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Policy Plan map designates the subject property as High Density Residential. The proposed conditional use permit and setback variances do not appear to conflict with the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan as listed in Chapter 15.20.030 of the ECDC. 4. Zoning Ordinance The subject property is zoned BN/Public Use. The surrounding area is zoned: North - BC South - BN West - CG (Contract) East Public Use/ RM-2.4 The proposed conditional use permit and setback variances do not appear to conflict with the purposes of the zoning ordinance or the BN/Public Use zone districts. 5. Not Detrimental Staff Report V-27-87 Page 3 The proposed conditional use permit and setback variances do not appear to pose any significant impact to the public or to any nearby private property or improvement. The treatment plant has been designed to be visually sensitive to the neighborhood. A declaration of nonsignificance has been issued on the project. 6. Minimum Variance In order to provide all the required improvements on the site, the requested setback variances do appear to represent a minimum variance request. 7. Transferability The conditional use permit should not be transferable. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City is required by both the State and Federal governments to build this secondary'sewage treatment plant. The plant is needed to help implement cleaning up pollution in Puget Sound. It has been designed to be both functional and aesthetically sensitive to the surrounding properties. Staff recommends that the CU-68-87 and V-33-87 be approved the setback variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. Comply with all mitigating conditions listed in the Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance (Exhibit 7). 2. Comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements. } CITY OF E O M O N O S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN sYg MAYOR sty;. 250 5lh AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 9B020 • (206) 771.3202 �+ HEARING EXAMINER ✓� CC'� FYNDTNGS AND RECOMMENDATION �1 4 �*46 OF THE BEARING EDMONDS OF THEp�'9/ye�,9i 9(98 G �Fpr IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FILE: CU•-G13•-2-7 r OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR V-33-•87 APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND A VARIANCE :'tC,t.;i3i";;�:+�iii'1}°�.tr��•i 'iil.=' Ct)�'�1�i•..L%!:i•1�. 11onrmli1.- e.!16 var irtnl:? shc•uld l,e approved subject- t.o t-he Cond.itions listed. INTRODUCTION The City of Edmond , 250 -- 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, W,ashingt.on, 981120, (hereinafter referred to as AFp1 icant:) has requested anr,rava1 of a co.,ndLtional use permLt Eor the. operati(:rCl of a socon.dary .sewage r•.reatment- plant gat-. 1.00 L)ayt•an Street, W;.shi.ri,:!ton Th' - \pplirant•. also s,?el!S a Varizance to reduce t})' r.sqaired street- setback for the proposed secondary sewage treatment. plant at the subject: propect:y. . The F.pp.t.i.c ant: seeks to reduce t:he reyt.t i red '25--f.00t street- set -back to 1) . ceot: on Avenue; a fr-%•'m the 25-foot- street setback to 4,8 eet'. on Dayton Street; and, a rec)t.tc't-ion from the 25-foot: street set.back to .8 feet on `:R 104. A hearing on the request was held before the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds, Washirrgton, c,rl December 17, 1987, At. c ho ''hf-? i,-ing i-hr': .i: ()i in,,,! ny ures:;nt,e i ::!i?:: -A"son y -and e V i d ric"I: Duane H::;Ymatt Bab A!Aiert:s Fir•uce wil.1ey F.tar:n?rlg�1�'or,l.. Ci.t.y of Edmonds St., 204 Ci,t-..Y of: fc3;n-onds Edmonds, WA 98920 :300 Admiral t-%Iay Edmonds„ FIN 98020 Editlonds, WA. 98020 n!: the h6ari.ng t-he f:ollot•:iw exhibit-s aer.e submitte•3 and admitted as Part bE the of, fici_al recxor.r1 of t.h.is proceeding: 1 -. f. Peapn? t 2 - Appl i^_a.. i on/Dec.larat.ions 3 - Vicirlit._� MaE, oanuary 8, 1988 Page I i. INCORPORATED AUGUST 11, 1 890 HEARING EXAMINER'S RP170MMENDATION .RE: CU-68-87 & V-3-� 7 4 - Existing Site Improvements 5 - Proposed Improvements 6 - Proposed Site Plan with Setback Locations 7 - Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance 8 - Predesign Report (10/87) 9 - Photographs After due consideration of the evidence presented by the Appli- cant, and evidence elicited during the public hearing, the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions constitute the basis of the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Applicant has requested approval of a conditional use permit for the operation of a secondary sewage treatment plant at 100 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. In addition, the Applicant has requested variances to reduce the required street setbacks at the proposed secondary sewage treatment plant. The requested setbacks include: a reduction from the 25-foot required street setback to 0 feet on 2nd Avenue South, 4.8 feet on Dayton Street, and, .8 feet on State Route (SR) 104. (Staff report.) 2. The subject property is the site of the current Edmonds Sewage Treatment Plant. It is the intent of the Applicant to expand this facility in order to be in compliance with an order from the Washington Department of Ecology that the City provide secondary treatment of waste water by April, 1991. The facility will serve Edmonds and all, or part, of Mountlake Terrace, Olympic View Water District, Ronald Sewer District, Woodway and Lynnwood. (Willey testimony.) 3. Should the City fail to award a contract by October 1988 for the secondary sewer treatment plant, it could be subject to fines and a building moratorium could be imposed for the areas serviced by the plant. (Alberts testimony.) 4. The site for the sewage treatment plant was chosen in 1979. In 1986 an engineering report on the proposed secondary sewage treatment facility was finalized. The report was eventually adopted by the City Council of the City of Edmonds. (Alberts testimony.) 5. Admitted at the hearing as Exhibit 6 and attached -hereto and incorporated as part of these findings is a location and setback plan of the proposed sewage treatment plant. All the buildings and structures to be developed on site are shown in Exhibit 6. (Exhibit 6.) 6. The wastewater treatment plant will have the following buildings and structures: January 8, 1988 Page 2 2 HEARING EXAMINER'S R `OMMENDATION rrf RE: CU-68-87 & V-33, 7 a. An operations control building which will be a one-story # structure located at the southern portion of the site; b. A solids process building where sludge residue will be removed; C. A new primary clarifier which will be constructed immediately west of the existing primary clarifiers. (Primary clarifiers are basins for the sludge); d. A raw sludge pumping station; e. An influent pumping station where waste water will be pumped into the site; f. Aeration basins used for biological treatment of the sewage; g. A blower building located immediately north of the aeration building. The blower building will have mechanical equipment which will feed air into the biological treatment conducted in the aeration basin; h. Three final clarifiers which will be used for the final settling process; and i. Effluent pumping station which will pump the treated water from the site. (Exhibit 6.) 17. The subject property is zoned BN/Public Use. The Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 16.45.010(C)(2) require community facilities such as the proposed secondary sewage treatment plant to be developed with a conditional use permit. (ECDC.) B. ECDC 20.05.010 sets forth the criteria that must be satisfied in order for a conditional use permit to be issued within the City of Edmonds."IThese criteria include: A. The proposed use must be consistent with the Comprehen- sive Plan of the City of Edmonds; B. The proposed use in its�'location must be consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance in which the pro- perty is located; and, C. The proposed use must not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, nor injurious to nearby private properties or improvements. (ECDC.) January 81 1988 Page 3 1 r 1 . I® 9. The Comprehensive Policy Plan Map designates the subject property as High Density Residential. (ECDC.) 10. The subject property is level. It is bounded on the east by 2nd Avenue South, to the north by Dayton Street and to the west by SR 104. The area to the south is undeveloped marsh lands. (Staff report.) 11. The subject property currently has a waste water treatment facility on site. In addition, the southern portion of the site is used for storage of City of Edmonds Public Works Department equipment. This portion of the site would be developed into the operations control building and the solids process building. (Exhibit 4.) 12. The proposed secondary sewage treatment plant will not pose any significant impact to the public, nor to nearby private property or improvements. The City submitted that the plant has been designed to be visually sensitive to the neighborhood. A declaration of nonsignificance has been issued for the project. Further, there was no testimony in opposition to the granting of the conditional use permit. (Staff report and Bowman testimony.) 13. In order for a variance to be granted within the City of Edmonds the criteria as set forth in ECDC 20.85.010 must be satisfied. These criteria include: A. Because of special circumstances relating to the pro- perty, the strict enforcement of the zoning ordinance would deprive the owner of use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. B. The approval of the variance would not be a grant of special privilege to the property in comparison with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. C. The approval of the variance will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Edmonds. D. The approval of the variance will be consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and the zone district in which the property is located. E. The variance as approved or conditionally approved will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and same zone. January 8, 1988 ;. Page 4 HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION RE: CU-68-87 & V-33 `7 .. F. The requested variance is the minimum necessary to allow the owner the rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. (ECDC.) 14. The subject property is zoned BN/Public Use. There is no classification in the ECDC for a Public Use. Therefore, ECDC 17.00.020(D) applies to this application. This section sets forth that all lands not classified according to established district classifications on the Official zoning Map shall be classified as RS-12. ECDC 16.20.030 estab- lishes the minimum street setback for RS-12 zoned property as 25 feet. It is from this standard that the Applicant seeks a variance. 15. ECDC 17.00.030(C) requires that variances for public structures and uses be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner with a final recommendation to the Edmonds City Council. (ECDC.) 16. Special circumstances exist for the granting of a variance from the street setbacks. Because of economic considera- tions, process design regulations, and constraints of the existing facilities, a variance is warranted. (Willey testimony.) ' 17. It is the intent of the City to continue to use the existing clarifiers on site and incorporate them as part of the secondary treatment process. To replace the clarifiers would result in a $500,000 to a $1,000,000 expenditure on the part of the City. These are economic factors to be considered in the granting of a variance. (Willey testimony.) 18. Because of the location of the two existing clarifiers, all other treatment facilities need to be developed in a northerly direction. This results in a constraint on the City of their existing facilities and it requires a design that necessitates the granting of a variance in setbacks from the various streets. (Willey testimony.) 19. The State of Washington's guidelines require that the treatment facility must be a certain size in order,'..to adequately handle sewage flow. In order to design�.a facility for that size, variances from the setbacks must be acquired. (Willey testimony.) 20. A proposed park will be located on the northern -most final clarifier. The park, a vest-pocket park, will be designed to blend in with the neighborhood and provide aesthetic relief to the site. (Willey testimony.) 21. The requested variance will not be detrimental to other properties or improvements. Although the variances are January 8, 1988 Page 5 l "�•. `' , �._____�_._.�.�' _ ..__..ram_. ... _...._.. .� _. .. .. ..... .. ..4 l V ... +. .. .c .....u....,,-rt .0 ....w . .. .. ...r. , �v... ,.,.....,w..r.L._...........�.....+...1Lrn.ub.a._.��..-a..aie s. a .i. t uhx+s i 1 .. HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION RE: CU-68-87 & V-33-Q7 4 sought for the -entire setbacks on the streets mentioned, only a few buildings will encroach within the setback standards of the BN zone. (Bowman testimony.) 22. The requested variance is the minimum necessary for the Applicant to adequately make the secondary treatment facility improvements. (Bowman 'testimony.) 23. The Planning Department of the City of Edmonds has recommended approval of the conditional use permit and the variance subject to the following conditions: 1. Comply with all mitigating conditions listed in the Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance (Exhibit 7). 2. Comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements. 24. The proposed operations control building will be between 45 feet and 50 feet from the marsh land immediately to the south. The construction of this building will not have an environmental impact on the marsh lands. (Willey testimony.) 25. No testimony from the public was presented at the hearing. CONCLUSIONS 1. The application is for the approval of a conditional use permit for the operation of a secondary sewage treatment plant at 100 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. In addition, the Applicant has requested variances to reduce the required street setbacks at the proposed secondary sewage treatment plant. The requested setbacks include: a reduction from the 25-foot required street setback to 0 feet on 2nd Avenue South; 4.8 feet on Dayton Street; and, .8 feet on SR 104. (Staff report.) 2. The requested conditional use permit and the variance are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of the subject property as High Density Residential. In parti- cular the proposed' facility will satisfy the goals and policies as set if;orth in ECDC 15.20.030. 1� 3. The requested conditional use permit and the variance request are consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinances of the City of Edmonds. Although there are no purposes specifically listed for BN/Public Use in the ECDC, the proposal is consistent with BN zones in that it will provide a service to the residents of the City of Edmonds and surrounding communities that is necessary for them. 4. The requested conditional use permit and the variance will not be detrimental to the public, nor to the health, safety and welfare of the public. It will not impact other private January 8, 1988 Page 6 ®m RE: NG.-EXAMINER S REC 09-1�1 1U14 CU-68-87 & V-33-R7 properties or improvements in the area. The facility is a public necessity that will be used for the treatment of sewage in the City of Edmonds for the eventual pollution control of the Puget Sound. 5. The conditional use permit should not be transferable. 6. The requested variances are the minimum necessary in order for the Applicant to develop the property in a manner that will satisfy State guidelines, utilize existing facilities, and minimize cost. RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION The requested conditional use permit for the allowance of a secondary sewage treatment plant at 100 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington, is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall comply with all mitigating conditions listed in the Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance, which is attached hereto and by this reference hereby incorporated as part of this decision. 2. The Applicant shall comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements. 3. A conditional use permit is valid only if the City Council of the City of Edmonds approves the variance for a reduction in the street setbacks on 2nd Avenue South, Dayton Street, and SR 104. 4. The conditional use permit is not transferable. It is hereby recommended to the City Council of the City of Edmonds that the requested variances for the reduction of the 25- foot street setbacks to 0 feet on 2nd Avenue South; 4.8 feet on Dayton Street; and, .8 feet on SR 104 should be granted subject to the conditions as set forth above for the conditional use permit. Entered this 8th day of January, 1988, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearing Examiner under Chapter 20.100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds. ��ES M: I�RISCOLL ring Examiner January 8, 1988 Page 7 t "'+�.... _ ___::_ t __ r_.fi, Fs....,%.»`.'•r.+s...i..une�xn..._.ns.�>,..,vy.u.. ...zs..�a.aa. n._ ""m:e..nui.:..amt ......+..,�.,==tir ' i a U 11\ •1 . V U[ 1/ 1 l 1 1 L. L l\ ~.J l� L V V l J�I � L I r/ RE: CU-68-87 & V-33-87 i { NOTICE You are hereby given notice that pursuant to RCW Section 35.63.130 the foregoing Findings, Conclusions and Recommenda- tions have been submitted to the Mayor and City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, for their consideration and approval. Council action on this item will occur at a later date. PROCEDURE FOR RECONSIDERATION Motions for reconsideration should be filed with James M. Driscoll, Hearing Examiner, City of Edmonds, Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington, 98020, within ten business days from the date -of these recommendations. The final date for motion for reconsideration is 5 p.m. on January 22, 1988. + 11 '�....�..' S I�SZ'a'ItrrywL "+x..f ;..:U. / '~ -. �..._ .e... 2..... ku.i.,. ,u,_,...:; ..«.. ... _. ..._ .ram. ....--«..r�_v.i.5...2.,; ��.S...e ¢ _.�_J ..... «....,__._.a.:ln.cse....f �,�c.u(,.Yr1"'• - I H D R CWC-HDR Suite 204 Telephone: Transmittal An HDR Engineering, Inc. 300 Admiral Way 206 774-1947 i Company Edmonds, Washington n1 lJ 1 t 98020-4127 'O'HUM vi t8f1 l ; \ � To � O K _. . . fell I Attention ��LA, ,\D kNKS O to I Date 3 - \ P g I Job No. A"� D lei C Regarding nUC[lr-ViL Ll We are sending you: U Attached U Under separate cover via the following items: U Shop drawings U Prints U Plans U Samples p U Specifications I� ` I u Copy of letter U Change order U Other i Copies (Date No. Description II� These are transmitted as checked below: U For approval U Approved as submitted U Resubmit copies for approval r U For your use U Approved as noted U Submit copies for distribution As requested U Returned for corrections U Return corrected prints UFor review/comment Other UForbids due 19 U Prints returned after loan to us Remarks A L �5 \1 A Sy9ae.S ��l t. (L,rtT UP u I t>vw���— � inS�z_�Rf-et awe- Y)b —1 t-S t. _. I Copy to Signed Y,. s:r If enclosures are not as noted please notify us at once t i r: ., t 1 4�F \ 1 �, .}' Y _��C r t'� i ir\ i� 5ryti"A+ F {4 j.:• •... dr •1.,.... f"'.'r...:r.�L...•.a....+. .:v.�4M ..}iw•.i v.r....._.u.. vkI `'1 '!F;7t�S' Us,cn� .:. �2cn� �"R•P� N��oNwt � �2r�-,�T P - oy 8 - Z- ct aq�� f-,�( bo= S� c ut•�� Cca�►� Di �� — Sq o - t�--C, y� L `T�cU�t•-t -rU p� � r,,;ri 1;. Ci,t`�-� �o .sue t� c�.��f; �vNr'z. U.� �T Tt' eV5 t\lv 0 c Pm /3 • Kta 6q ` f-L'5Sc.�aex o t aw �T- D�PT . Ot� Ftst �s _ 1�iF ADO wcb 3� l w J rJ, l.lrl `i1 • \-�.� C.).�A�r(, l�r,� T�'t(+�.�. P�'�yrr Pxi"�mF``' '• �� r-�,,.rc,5. s%,r C�{: Lc�S Ir4b (K� StM� fr Y'r to 'I'll \NJ6t P. O 1�518�1 sr. 1 t 'a 202 Second Aver-9 South Edmonds, Wash, in 98020 { Phone (206) 771-8145 FAX (206) 771-9016 Wright Schuchart Harbor Co. March 6, 1989 tij 4187-034 CWC HDR Suite #204 300 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020-4127 Attention: Mr. Henry Benjes, Jr. Subject: City of Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant Installation of 36" Outfall Dear Mr. Benjes: After discussions with General Construction Company (the 36" outfall installation Subcontractor), WSHCo proposes to complete installation of the outfall between September 5, 1989 and December 1, 1989. The current contract requires that the 36" wye and butterfly valves be installed in 1989 and the north outfall and south diffuser be installed in 1990. WSHCo and its subcontractor feel that completing the work in 1989 will be advan- tageous to the Owner and minimize construction impact. We await your review, approval and inclusion of this change into a no cost Change Order to the contract. very truly yours, WRIGEU SCHUC HART HARBOR CO. ohn Langer `Prof ect ger JLL: j cm cc: B. Rowland - CWC D. Harmon - CWC B. Alberts - City of Edm. J. Dick - GCC R. Pollack - Corps of Eng. !----------- Ln r 61989 ;; ; .