Loading...
1208 PUGET DR.pdfAPPLICATION TO BOARD OF ADJUST14ENT APPLICANT: Indicate t or degree of i OWNER: LOCATION`OF PROPERTY(ADDRESS): LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPEW: File No sr -- Date 2490 Fee $25.00 Rec't No.a�P1 HEARING DATE71�_Sd PHONE: ua� S PNONE: l c . l!:g ,r * e*,e,r,r..r•xt,r,e,r*x*,rsr**,rt,re**t*****,r****ttnt********sr**,e*+,tw***«**,t,t,t**vr+*,e,e«.,e,er,r«***..«* **— To be completed by the Planning Dept: Use Zane-jge2= Lys Legal description checked and approved by: Date: tst,r«+er****,rr,�****,r,e*,t***,r,►******�,r*****«* *,r* �*,t*****,r,rr,t*,t**,t******,t***,t,r***** * �,+*+*,r**� t**«* VICINITY SKETCH: PLEASE SHOW BELOW A VICINITY SKETCH AS PER EXAMPLE, INDICATiN� NORTH. Example: MAY .� cirr OF INNING D D S CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED: STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH j On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and fir the S� of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personalty appeared �� ,who being duly sworn, on-Mv/ er oath deposes and says that s e as prepare an rep the foregoing statements and has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as-M#/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of l� Af PUBLIC, n an 0r fate o� Washington, residing at � k, 777777 [ I 4 STANDARD AND CRITERIA USED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO EVALUATE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATIONS Section 12.16.080 Conditional Use Criteria. The standards and criteria governing the isguance of Conditional Use Permits are as follows: A. That the use will not endanger the public health, morals and general welfare if located where proposed and developed, and recognizes and compensates for variations and degree of technological processes and equipment as related to the factors of noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibration, odors and hazard or public need; and B. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications set including the general forth in the zone where it proposes to in Chapter 12.14 locate; of this Code; and 1"I provisions set forth C. That the use will not be injurious or detrimental to adjoining or abutting property; or that the use is a public necessity; and D. That the location and character of the use if developed accor ding to the plan as submitted and approved, will be in harmony and com- patible with the area in which it is to be located as set forth in the applicable zoning classification in Chapter 12.13 and the Com prehensive Plan for the development of Edmonds and its environs; and E. In addition, the Board may impose specific conditions precedent to establishing the use, and said conditions may include: V" 1. Increasing requirements in the standards, criteria or policies established by this Ordinance; 2. Stipulating the exact location of the use as a means of minimizing hazards to life, limb, property damage, erosion, land slides or traffic; 3. Requiring structural features or equipment essential to serve the same purposes set forth in item (2) above; 4. imposing conditions similar to those set forth in items (2) and (3) above, as deemed necessary to establish parity with uses permitted in the same zone in their freedom from nuisance gener- ating features in matters of noise, odors, air pollution, wastes, vibration, traffic, physical hazards. F. All conditions required by the Board shall be entered in the minutes of the meeting at which the permit is granted and also on the certifi- cate of the Conditional Use Permit; APPEAL PROCEDURE 12.16.130 (c) The action of the Board of Adjustment shall be final and conclusive unless, within ten days from the date of action taken by the Board of Adjustment at a public hearing, the original applicant or an adverse party makes application to the Superior Court for Snohomish County for a writ of certiorari, a writ of prohibition, or a writ of mandamus. (Ord.1554 (part), 1971; Ord. 1546(3) 1971: Ord. 1372 (1), 1968: Ord. 1074 (part). 1964.) Ww- "W y; Date of Publication: ('4 SO .__ Continuances: Data of Posting: (0 —9 —Vn�__ Date of Appeal from Decision of the Hoard: Secretary, card of Adjustment f rr 1 I k C PROJECT NA ITY OF EDMOS SiE� U� ENVIRQNMENTAL ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITT D `' —GA o determine Thur e information on this of the on on the questioncasotha thoroughly possible. environment of the City Edmonds. Pleaseanswereach 1. LAND "�' /f �, r Are % / l'' �`z.P �' Soils 7yp ►� ations_�.�,��'?� � Description of topography (1° slope) NOTE: If grading or filling will exceed 500 cubic yards a grading Grading: Estimated cubic yards and filling plan must be sub- the application. Filling: Estimated cubic yard mitted with �� Estimated area to be paved (including bui dings) ���/�� / ���L_�__ Estimated area in open space (pervious surface) -� 2. WATER ,f ter Stream - Estimated flow (cubic feet per seco '�e-f be altered? yes, to what degree. Will stream _�,,�--if Other water bodies? drainage Method of handling runoff�__�'-��' Impact an storm kd' cent to sh elines zone? L i in 200 feet of MHHW? /-�--� 3. VEGE� GAL' / �G�..•f s / Type e and approximate number of trees Minimum diameter of trees to remain /ter,' " °% of trees to be removed % to be removed Ground cover_ Pro sedll ndscap� g, , A/z, 4. EXISTING LAI4D USE WITHIN`300 FEET RADIUS e PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 5. CIRCULATION Estimated increase in auto trips daily Availability of public transportation l 6. AREA OF IMPACT Regional Neighborhood_ �--~_ City-wide 7. EFFECT ON AIR QUALITY 8. CHANGES IN NOISE GENERATION �- VF IP " t f M1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. 311 The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe.an explanation would be helpful to government 4 decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to those questions now will help all agencies involved undertake the required environmental r review without unnecessary delay. 1 °'- The following questions apply to your total proposal, psi not just to the permit for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts that will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all agencies involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating :< paperwork in the future. j NOTE: This is a standard form being usgd by all state y and local agencies in the State of Washington for various' kfit; r types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just' "? answer it "not applicable" (N/A) and continue on to the t; next question. .kerpry 8© m`9,� .. .... . ... ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 7R in A. BACKGROUND /'I Name of Proponent 2. Address and Phone fumber of Proponent AIW ---3. Date Checklist Submitted -5— -2 4. Agency Requiring Checklist,,, L-5. Name of Proposal, if applicable " Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factQrs that will give an accu!iteg f its 1500 erstanding sco a and nature: -nv6e Co. C-/ /7. Location of Pr' osal (describe the physical sefting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- w. including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal X 4,/u,�11 List of all Permits,* Licenses, or Government Approva/fi Required for all, Proposal (federal, state, and local including rezones): 'rZ VIV. Do y6u have any planfor future additi6n s expansions, or further activity elated to or connected with -)this proposal? If es xplain. 7 AK L-1 -ZICAI' - �'- -6 �/� /m -c 11. Doyou know o �'/any plans by others whid may affCt the property covered by your proposal? f yes, explain. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date,.,dlscribe the nature of such application form: YES MAYBE NO C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? -- --- d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? — e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, V- dissolved oxygen or turbidity? - -- -- f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? --- g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? — h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter- gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? kGrrl oiQ W, �� � �+�'C't0N4k Explanation: 4, Flora. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (in- cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, �.- microflora and aquatic plants)? — --- b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered //pecies of flora? ,�jClG�t'��C'GC c. Introduction of new specievff flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of exist- ing species? d. Recution in acreage of any agri- cultural crop? Explanation: -3- B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of ell "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? _✓ .._ c. Change in topography or ground surface v relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or phys cal features? _ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion , • of soils, either on or off the site _ f. Changes in deposition or erosio of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the oceanor any bay, inlet r lake? Dell Explanation: C- tJ 1 '�� &) t s Am&t- f �; i 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? p b. The creation of objectionableodors? s.� c. Alteration of air movement, mo sture or temperature, or any change in c imate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the colrse or direction of water movements, ii either / marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, rainage patterns, or the rate and amount o sur- face water runoff? Ab­ 1aw'-9W --'.. :. ,i RR YES MAYBE ND V5. Fauna. WIll the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? .�. — b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species y of fauna? -- c. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement, of fauna? — --- d Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: 44 R {r 6, Noise. Will the proposal increase V. exVsti ng noise levels? -- ;�,_ x4 �ti—. Explanation: �5 t�srtt �� G�t�E:►'G+� �L,p cr AZ,YVE�IA�� t rJ L1� O 1M , f; v 7. Li ht and Glare. Will the proposal V, pro ice new Tight or glare? {, Explanation•_ -'CAcJ�1 t'It�rwtiE' )�tl G�G,�'7'G -►�1 ZG�{1 r ,4 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result n t e alteration of the present or �' � fanned land use of an area? — _ f : Utj i d s, 1Jy�C xplanation: �-.PyQD i S- N"TVL`� 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal " result n: ?_ a. Increase in the rate of use of any 1Y1 natural resource? — — -- ' b. Depletion of any nonrenewable �i i 1 r T r;4 • IF a YES MAYBE N-0 1 .M Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation} in the event of an accident or upset condi- tions? Explanation: VI/i Population. Will the ro osal alter the p P 13. location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? JZ Explanation: } Housing. Will the proposal affect existing oous3' g, or demand create a for additional ; housing? tJrn Explanation: { `t Transportation Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in:. a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? _ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? .� e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor r vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _i /J _ . , , . />� t •� •5- ,i+� . '�R�` r, � yF � r� , r , , +. � F k{ t , t * x :r�l, � r,,+`4 �, +r'`,e ua �fi'�r�.£x + �,� jt> "��d�yF�i 'L ��{• ��sc�,�'a�s t� 7� r i a w. ✓� � � >� Is �,'c Y gF �'� � _ v.:� .k?�I�i>,��,{`Ali ,,vLL ,t ry 1 hF� 'R YES MAYBE NO s 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have , Y an a ect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in, any of the following areas: F a. Fire protection? — w� �'- b. Police protection? _._.. —.— c. Schools? ---- -- r d. Parks or other recreational facilities? — — e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ---- f. Other governmental services? Explanation: r q ° r UZI/"Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel V, or energy? — b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: _ .�- t a t i tt ' 1`5. Utilities. Will the proposal result in k a ne— ed'Tor new systems or alterations to `. the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? -- --- b. Communications systems? C. Water? fU d. Sewer or septic tanks? t i e. Storm water drainage? f. .Solid wasteLnisposal? — 1 Explanation: VF 7 ' YES MAYBE NO Human Health. Will the proposal result _ in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? L Explanation: _ s ' Aesthetics. Will the proposal result p p t n the -obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?. Explanation: Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quan- tity of existing recreational oppor- tunities? Explanation: s ,t{ 'f c-20-.J Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an a teration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or y� building? Explanation: i C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may wit raw any declaration or non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this c List should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disci r on my part. PROPONENT• G / i 1, TQ VIA 4 7 }y j Fl ;1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF; TRACT 25, PUGBT SOUND, MACHINERY DEPOT FIVE i` ACRE :TRACTS, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN'VOLUME- ?` FIVE OF PLATS, PAGE 47,,RECORDS OF"SNOHOMISH COUNTY.` WASH., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGINNINd':'Alt A POINT'ON"TH8"NORTH` l LINE OF SAID TRACT 25, '330 FT. WEST OF THE N.E. CORNER; r `THENCE WEST 275.FT.; THENCE SOUTH 330 FT. 'PO'THE SOUTH LZN& OF SAID LOT 25, THENCE EAST 275 FT ; THENCE NORTH 330'�FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.'` f ,.a i � .r�'< �I��t`'�2Tvs7 �11 '1 F i ��,. � � 1 fXJ Nlr�t <t � � t � F - t v � r k � � :=. '� � ,^s ��, 3yr..,, �l� ,�r':x/rri 73 b�P`� i�� .� G �� � 2 � �ha + .4i� �' 4r � <�i � - if i�,n� �' > t' �' +Y .�4 ,Y. �3 a �'r„ _. r r � � _ _ � _ \ _ _ _ _ _..�L)�_ __ A�4 _ _ _ _ 0 x r . r . s� pi lb A PORTION OF TRr.�:IT '25 OWNED BY: , NINA GRADER, 17244 NE 1,16th, REDMOND, WA. 98052 PHONE: �- 2018 C -.. m z t i i i { Said hearing will be at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment and all interested persons are invited to appear. IRENE VARNEY MORAN City Clerk, City of Edmonds FILE NO: CU-35-80 PUBLISH: 6-2-80 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF SNOHOMiSH, The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and. says, that she is Principal Clerk of the EVERETT HERALD, a daily news- n" paper printed and published in the City of Everett; County of'Snoho- t mish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper. is a _ newspaper,' of general circulation in said .County and State, :that said' newspaper has been approved as a legal, newspaper by orderof ;the Superior: Court of Snohomish County, and that the notice .::...... .............. NOTICE OF HEARING. ;:. ...................... ....... ........................................................ ......... ...... ..... ........... a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said newspaper proper and not in supplement form, In the regular and entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: JUNE 2 1980 ................�........................,....................................................................................... € ;1 4 ................... .............................................................. .......... ..... and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers 4'.. during all of said period. ................... ....._...................................................................... .............. Principal Clerk u 3rd,. Subscribed and sworn to before me this JUNE 80 t. j day of ....../...................................... 19 ••...... Public in and for the State of Washington, at Everett, Snohomish County. F ;7g } " CITY OF EDMONDS' TIs si 5" THE ' �s' @ WILL HOLD A PUBARING PUBLIC HE t Utle sc� 19 g o f ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO. / Il • Q � try J. s4 I j t 4 ' PROPERTY ADDRESS AND LOCATION f O f � F V t,� t f# ZONE DISTRICT s fi < THE NEARING WILL BEGIN AT OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER, 250 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH. .M. , IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7 1F YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL, YOU MAY COME TO THE HEARING AND SPEAK. YOU } MAY ALSO WRITE A LETTER STATING YOUR VIEWS WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING. I, PLEASE ADDRESS THE LETTER TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND INCLUDE THE 1 ' ABOVE FILE NUMBER. fIDI' IF THE ITEM IS CONTINUED TO ANOTHER HEARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED, OR' ; FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, THE DATE OF THE CONTINUED HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED ONLY AT THE MEETING. t c., ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT } ` 505 BELL STREET, EDMONDS (PHONE 775-2525, EXT. 227), 4 THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION, OR }{ r WA an %'k N I N G 7` CONCEALMENT OF THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE �� �° 54, • OF THE HEARING IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER -0 a f: � � � � �� & : .. �� �. /, . � �: \� � ^ � � � \ � ' }� � . <� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � «2� � � � � � � � � � � � 2� � � � d«� «� � � � i� � > � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . :�w , « ©� © �� © �� <<� � � � � � � � � � � . � ,� � \� � � � � � \ � �\ »,» . ,y2 « ..w. 2\ m� .?«\ . � d«.� � � . }� <»` ` � � � � � \� � »2: 2 °� � . � � .y. . . . » a y « � « ��w�� \ y�� -W 717A,7 or: 7� "T 77" June 10, 1980 MEMO TO: Planning Department ��MFROM: Engineering Division W* SUBJECT: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT COMMENTS FOR MEETING OF JUN-,' 18. 1980 V-15-80 RON & JACKIE WILLIATIS - Variance from required sideyard set- bac 7Tr5_TEF_ _Avenue '7 at North. j. Proposal would make the existing garage into a non -con- forming structure. Engineering has ' no further comment on this variance. V-17-80 EUGENE PAGANO - Variance from required sidevard setback at 7TT27-93th Avenue West. Engineering has no objection to this variance. A V-18-80 GARY A. VISSER JR. - Variance from required rearyard set- 5ac_at 2Tr2T_ 2nd Place West. P Engineering has no objection to this variance provided that no permanent construction is contemplated to cross exist- ing ten foot wide utilities easement. V-19-80 HAMMER'S CONSTRUCTION - Variance from required sid eyard setbac at t Street S.W. Engineering can see no technical difficulty in developing a lot of this large a size either with or 'without the re- quested variance. Fifteen foot dedication at North end of property would be required if property is subdivided. CU-35-80 NI14A GRADER - Conditional Use Permit for filling of more Ma�n �cubic yards at 1208-18 Puget Drive. Site review by Engineering staff disclosed an apparently re- cent fill of larger extent than that which is shown on ap- plicant's drawings. An existing large spring or stream crosses the fillbetweenlines shown as Sections A -A and A-B on applicant's plan. This stream is fed by several AWL 7 Memo to: Planning Department From: Engineering; Division Subject-: Board of Adjustment Comments for Meeting; of ,Tune 18, 1980 Page -2- CU-35-80 (cont'd.) smaller streams to the South of specified fill area, and uphill from the fill area. This area to the South is very wet and boggy and Engineering considers that inade- quate provisions have been proposed for intercepting the many streams and for carrying the water through the fill in a manner that would prevent saturation of the fill. This is further evident by the wet and loose character of the fill which has already been placed. There is al- so evidence of fill placed over boggy areas as well as over stumps, debris and other organic material which may aggravate the stability of the fill. Such debris should be removed before fill is placed. Drainage lines shown on applicant's plan do not appear to reflect conditions as observed on the site. Staff hydraulics engineers' comments are as follows: "y Elevations: Contour line labeled "0" becomes a line armed "; fill should remain above low point elevation on 12th Avenue North. Land Stabil_i�t_yY Any slopes over 30 percent in this area �w are c.assi'tied as presenting severe landslide hazards. Slopes shown on applicant's plans indicate up to 80 per- cent slopes in the fill area. r�? Erosion Control: To prevent sediment from entering; the streams wit in the property, exposed soil surfaces should be provided with erosion control measures. Drainage out lets require proper design of measures to prevent scouring. Drainage: Properly designed details are required to nre- ? vent sediment buildup in cross -drain pipes. Such details should be shown at all inflow locations, around pipe per- forations, and at pipe ends. Drain lines extending through the fill should be tight lines to prevent saturation of the fill. Proper measures should be designed to prevent street p runoff from entering the site. On slopes over 15 percent, drain lines should be tight -lined to the valley floor and 51 proper anchorage of lines should be designed and specified 'r on the drawings. Prior to proceeding with the installation of any further' drainage provisions, or the placing of any additional fill,a applicant must submit to the City for review and approval }t a detailed plan prepared by a licensed Professional Engineer who is qualified to address the several problems evident on Memo to: Planning Department From: Engineering Division Subject: Board of Adjustment Comments for Meeting of June 19,80 Page -3- .14, CU-35-80 (cont'd.) this site. The plan should be supported by such An engi neer s calculations,for runoff and for the sizing of drain-•�r: age piping. ADAMS, P.E.- City Engineer: POW/j f } �. '. _j -. .. 1 f .T".'H'k'� J ., :i:i4.y ,., Luc(r"n..le14t9N`Xi4Y.'.Vi'14�'ei(Xi7t�'1+Dh'ArNW�dlCix ww..�XFY'7r�n:e'x�t �3'XPp�X'l9d�i �%i.�i !� r j � , ' C611 V,W '..'1 V1 V VGl ✓V.V 4AiJ iV J'QL43J VY lili • L}L. 4Gi vw LY ♦r r.a.. vt+.i of her application. Due;to a_large number of concerns by the Engineering Division, the Conditional Use Permit application has been continued until the July lb, 1980 Board of Adjustment meeting. A copy of the Engineering Division comments are attached I would like to request that you inspect the property at the above address and post a stop work order until all the required,` permits have been obtained. DB/mt attachments w .. ... _ a y RK CITY.,OF. r r n S TAB E OF W,NSH 1 r ,� +J y'F t' All Personas Are 'H o r it r r'i - + Ti } Pertaining to Construction, Alterations or� ,Repairs. On These Premises at THIS ORDER IS ISSUED BECAUSE By- BUILDING OFFICIAL A.M. POSTED P.M. 19 The failure to stop work, or the resuming of work VIA R N I N G without permission from the Department of Build- ings, or the removal, mutilation, or concealment of, this notice is punishable by fine and imprisonment. s ,� lip ' v fir�Y7Y�i� v➢�R:jfl�J�}k FT4t��l�'��r��-t .r � j� tY + t. 'J v i , ��t; •:,• ._ ... -'`''. rt„' dt'"y j h. ' - , .. �1"`�' W�- f f,, 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. WELCOME AND HEARING PROCEDURE TO APPLICANTS' % " 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5 REPORT FROM STAFF 6. -AGENDA {< V-15-80 RON & JACKTE WILLIAMS - Variance from required North. (RS-12) sl eyar setback at 315 9th Avenue V-'17-80 EUGENE PAGANO - Variance from required sideyard West. (RS-$) set ac at 224 95th Avenue Vr1$-:80 - GARY A. VISSER JR. - Variance from'required 21124 82nd Place West. (RS-8) rearyar setbac at V-19-80 t 1 � "`�' _`-3'�;e Fs> "='` -r,s-^ �y-,.a t� } .eri=S�Z'a _ ;�-.;,�. � � �-` �..�=,�... Vic.- — _ ; _.. C` \ U\VC GJ :� ,, � � i d } �� .J � . ,,, e� �-'i � C ` �ti �J BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT August 20, lmm ` as called to order by The regular~~meeting-—of the Edmonds—— Board' of the Center.Chairman Jack Byrd at 7:30 p.m. in'the Council Chambers Edmonds Civic functions of the '--- — Board, the procedure of the hearings, and the method of appealing uocimmo of the ' Board. PRESENT ABSENT� STAFF PRESENT Jack Byrd Paul Row Duane Bowman, o,su/um "an.=, Muryl Medina Anne McGee mm Smwnn^ Engineer Technician - ` Harold Hatz°nb Ner Tanaka, City - Jackie Parrett, opnvtx City ��em �mnnr��h ' Bill Leraa ^Chai man Byrd advised that Mr. Roy's and Mrs. McGee's absences should be designated "vnexnvsed " pwmemt to Uru nm`co2l5V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MR. HATZENBUHLER nOYso, SECONDED BY mm. ncD w4, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES 0ruoLY'l«~ 1980, MOTION cxnnoa.REPORT FROM STAFF Mr. Bowman advised that there is some questionto the status of Paul Roy and his had resigned Board and that a 'letter beensent month felt it could be that oe'had -resigned and if a letter has not been submitted one will be requested. Mr.-Bowman,advised that aletter had been received from winaGrau=r (i-3s uV)^ r st nyvwt^ora4m/ ,cf the wwoconvn. CONTINUED AGENDA � v-21-80 Variance from underground wiring requirement at irementat 203,31 83Fd Ave. N. (RS-o) Chapter 6.30.060 of the Edmonds City Code requires underground wiring for all new construction, and the building permit for this home and the short subdiv' divisiond this requirement. The Engineeri 'sion —��d �����n�h��i�li'�t»vr`h newer homes in the area have underground electric service. Mr. Bowman reviewed_-- '— —variance criteria. It would no applicable onditions not generally 'other lands in the same district. Strict enforcement of the zoning code would not deprive the property owner of rights enjoyed by other properties `nthe same district. The special conditions result~~ '— -- ---- of the applicant, inasmuch as the Building Permit clearly required undergrour wiring. There were no unnecessary hardships or practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of the zoning code. Granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the mw/rn mren' or °°..".= of property owners� ^' the ^^~^'"�except for the unsightliness spanning tsr-Bowman said this was not the minimum variance tc AOL i.£ 1� j kl. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - June 18, 1980 The regular meeting of the Edmonds Board of Adjustment was called to order by Chairman Paul Roy at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center. Chairman Roy welcomed the audience and explained the functions of the Board, the procedure of the hearings, and the method of appealing decisions of the Board. PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Paul Roy Harold Hatzenbuhler Duane Bowman, Associate Planner Muryl Medina Bill Leraas Jim Adams, City Engineer Jack Byrd Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney Ann Derleth Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk Anne McGee APPROVAL OF MINUTES MR. BYRD MOVED, SECONDED BY MRS. McGEE, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MAY 21, 1980. MOTION CARRIED. REPORT FROM STAFF Mr. Bowman reported that with regard to 86 on this evening's agenda the concerns raised by the Engineering Divsion had not yet tieen resolved so he suggested it be continued to the next meeting, and he had so advised the appl�cantr �aMffS MOIN}l MOVD, SECONDED BY ;MRS McGEE, TO GQNTINUE CU 35=80 TO JULY 1b,'98O`' MDTION''CAisRTE'D AGENDA V-15-80 RON AND JACKIE WILLIAMS - Variance from required side yard setback at 1315 9th Ave.(RS-12) The application was to reduce the west side yard setback from 10' to 51, -resulting in a 5' variance. Mr. Bowman reviewed the variance criteria. This would not amount to a rezone. The conditions not generally applicable to other properties in the same district were that the subject property is a corner lot and must meet front yard setbacks from both Hindley Lane and 9th Ave. N. Strict enforcement of the zoning code would restrict the design and location for a garage on this property. The special conditions were not the result of actions of the applicant. The practical difficulty was that there really was no other place to construct a garage unless it was to be off 9th Ave. which is a very busy street. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the health and safety of property owners in the vicinity. Mr. Bowman considered this to be a minimum variance to make possible reasonable use of the land, and he felt granting of the variance generally would be in harmony and compatible with the zoning code. The applicant intended removing an existing nonconforming one -car garage and constructing a larger garage, meeting all the setbacks except for the requested variance. Mr. Bowman recommended approval. The hearing was opened to the public. Dick Geigte, P.O. Box 2309, Lynnwood, representing the applicants, said the existing garage is too close to 9th Ave, and too small, and the applicants wish to construct a two -car garage accessing from Hindley Lane. Lou Oskowski, 710 Hindley Lane, asked how far back from Hindley Lane the new garage would be and he was told it would be 25'. He said there is a traffic jam at Hindley and 9th every weekend and if the garage were too close to the street there would be cars parked there and a sight obstruction created. (At this time Mrs. Derleth arrived.) Mr. Geigte was asked how large the garage would be and he said it would be 18' wide, not actually a two -car garage but a large one -car garage. The public portion of the hearing was closed. DATE: September 23, 1980 TO: Nina Grader 17244 N.E. 116th Redmond, WA 98052 " `TRANSMITTING: Board of Adjustment Minutes RE: CU-35-80: AS YOU REQUESTED: _ E FOR YOUR INFORMATION: XX AS WE DISCUSSED: FOR APPROVAL: J FOR.YOUR FILE: . REVIEW AND COMMENT: C0114ENT AND RETURN x MINUTES OF MEETING: —August 20, 1980 t _ REMARKS: