Loading...
160920 MAD (Wetland Buffer Averaging Enhancement Plan).pdfWetland Buffer Averaging and Enhancement Plan New Madrona K-8 Project Edmonds, Washington September 20, 2016 Submitted To: Ms. Taine Wilton Edmonds School District #15 20420 68th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 By: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 N 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98103 21-1-22082-006 21-1-22082-006-R1f/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 PURPOSE ..............................................................................................................................1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................1 3.0 WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGING ...................................................................................2 3.1 Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Requirements ...........................2 3.2 Existing Wetland B Buffer Condition and Functions ................................................2 3.3 Wetland B Buffer Averaging Strategy .......................................................................3 4.0 WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT .............................................................................4 4.1 Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan ............................................................................4 4.2 Wetland Buffer Enhancement Sequence ....................................................................5 4.3 Maintenance ...............................................................................................................6 4.4 Monitoring Plan ..........................................................................................................6 4.5 Performance Standards ...............................................................................................8 5.0 CLOSURE ..............................................................................................................................8 6.0 REFERENCES .....................................................................................................................10 TABLE 1 Vegetation Performance Standards ..........................................................................8 FIGURES 1 Vicinity Map 2 Wetland Buffer Averaging Plan 3 Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan APPENDICES A Wetland Buffer Enhancement Area Photos B Important Information About Your Wetland Delineation/Mitigation and/or Stream Classification Report 21-1-22082-006-R1f/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 1 WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGING AND ENHANCEMENT PLAN NEW MADRONA K-8 PROJECT EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 1.0 PURPOSE Shannon & Wilson, Inc. (Shannon & Wilson) was contracted by the City of Edmonds School District (District) No. 15 to assist with the wetland buffer averaging and enhancement strategy associated with a site wetland, Wetland B, identified by Shannon & Wilson on the New Madrona K-8 project site in Edmonds, Washington (Figure 1). This plan was prepared for the exclusive use of the Edmonds School District and their representatives for the purpose of complying with the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC), which regulates activities within wetland buffers. 2.0 INTRODUCTION The District plans to construct a new Madrona K-8 school on the south side of the approximately 40-acre property, located at 9300 236th Street SW (Snohomish County tax parcel 27033600404600). The project is located within Section 36 of Township 27 N, Range 4 E, Willamette Meridian. The property is dissected by two steeply sloped wooded areas running in north-south alignments; one is a ravine located along the eastern property boundary and the other is a forested incline located near the middle of the property. The existing Madrona Elementary School is located in the northeast corner of the property and the former Woodway Elementary School is located in the opposite southwest corner of the property. Recreational areas including a track and baseball field, and soccer fields are located in the southeast and northwest corners of the property. The areas surrounding the property consist primarily of residential development. A wetland and stream delineation completed in July 2015 identified three wetlands (Wetlands A, B, and C) on the project site. Wetland delineation findings are described in the Revised Wetland and Stream Delineation Report for the New Madrona K-8 Project (Shannon & Wilson, 2016). The current design for the new school is constrained by the property’s steep slopes and would unavoidably extend into a portion of the standard buffer for Wetland B. This plan describes the Wetland B buffer averaging strategy and also describes proposed Wetland B buffer enhancements that would complement the wetland buffer averaging strategy. 21-1-22082-006-R1f/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 2 3.0 WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGING 3.1 Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Requirements The City regulates wetland buffers under Chapter 23.50 of the ECDC (City, 2016). Wetland B is a Category III depressional wetland (Shannon & Wilson, 2016). The City requires a 60-foot standard buffer width around Category III wetlands (ECDC 23.50.040(F)(1). Under ECDC 23.50(G)(3), the City allows for wetland buffer averaging with wetland buffer enhancement if the following requirements are met:  The buffer averaging and enhancement plan provides evidence that wetland functions and values will be: ― Increased or retained through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is generally intact; or ― Increased through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is inadequate to protect the functions and values of the wetland.  The wetland contains variations in sensitivity due to existing physical characteristics or the character of the buffer varies in slope, soils, or vegetation, and the wetland would benefit from a wider buffer in places and would not be adversely impacted by a narrower buffer in other places;  The total area contained in the buffer area, or the total buffer area existing on a subject parcel for wetlands extending off-site, after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within a standard buffer; and  The buffer width at any single location is not reduced by more than 25 percent to less than 50 percent of the standard buffer width.1 The following sections of the plan demonstrate how the Wetland B buffer averaging and enhancement strategy meets these criteria. 3.2 Existing Wetland B Buffer Condition and Functions The standard buffer associated with Wetland B is primarily located in the forested ravine located along the eastern property boundary, and a portion of the wetland buffer extends beyond the steep slopes of the ravine and into playfield south of the existing school. A chain link fence is located at the top of the slope at the edge of the play field. Most of the Wetland B buffer is densely vegetated, with the exception of several areas in the ravine adjacent to the wetland’s 1 As shown on the City’s ECDC website. Communication with the City has clarified the sentence to mean, “The buffer width at any single location is not reduced by more than 25 percent of the standard buffer width.” 21-1-22082-006-R1f/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 3 eastern boundary and the playfield area. The wetland buffer’s vegetation within the ravine is generally dominated by a forested strata of western red cedar (Thuja plicata), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), a shrub strata of salal (Gaultheria shallon), Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa), English laurel (Prunus laurocerasus), and Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis); and a ground cover of sword fern (Polystichum munitum). The vegetation, in combination with the topographic variation in the ravine, visually screen and reduce noise in the wetland from the surrounding residential developments and school. The vegetation also has the potential to provide wildlife habitat to passerine birds and small mammals and slow surface water flow through the area. The portion of Wetland B buffer that extends beyond the steep slopes and into the playfield is comprised of lawn and due to its vegetation and proximity to school activities, provides minimal wildlife habitat, water quality function, or screening. Several unimproved footpaths are located in and around the Wetland B buffer. The paths are part of a large trail system located throughout the project area. The paths provide educational opportunities to students and the community and are part of an orienteering course. Chapter 23.50.040.G.5.c.i of the ECDC allows walkways and trails within wetland buffer and the project does not plan on removing the paths. Based on the site survey, there are two existing stormwater outfalls located in the Wetland B buffer. One outfall, an 8-inch metal pipe, is located in the field and will continue to be used to discharge stormwater following project construction. However, as part of the project, the site’s stormwater treatment prior to reaching the outfall will be updated to meet current standards. Additionally, the area around the 8-inch outfall has been scoured by the discharge. To prevent further erosion and sedimentation, the project will install quarry spalls underlain by geotextile fabric, which will not require vegetation removal. The second outfall, a 10-inch polyvinyl chloride pipe, has not been identified in the field and may be buried or dysfunctional. 3.3 Wetland B Buffer Averaging Strategy The project proposes to average the Wetland B buffer width where improvements associated with the new school design would unavoidably impact the wetland buffer, mainly at the top of the steep slope and in the play field area. This strategy would involve reducing the standard wetland buffer width to no less than 45 feet (25 percent of the standard 60-foot buffer width) in the locations closest to the new school design, which would be a reduction of 3,835 square feet, and extending the wetland buffer by 3,835 square feet at its northern boundary (Figure 2). 21-1-22082-006-R1f/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 4 Given the variation in wetland buffer condition between the ravine and play field area, the wetland would benefit from a greater wetland buffer width where dense vegetation is present to the north and would not be adversely affected by a reduction in buffer width to the west, at the top of the steep slope, and in the existing play field area. Section 23.50.40.H.3 of the ECDC includes a requirement for the installation of permanent fencing at the wetland buffer boundary when buffer averaging is implemented as part of a development proposal, and also states that the director may waive this requirement (City, 2016). The majority of the Wetland B buffer boundary is located on densely vegetated steep slopes, largely negating the need for a fence. Additionally, the few available access points to the wetland buffer are used to support the education opportunities described above in Section 3.2. For these reasons, fencing is not part of the wetland buffer averaging plan and we recommend that this requirement be waived. 4.0 WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT 4.1 Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan A wetland buffer enhancement plan has been developed to meet the City’s criteria for wetland buffer averaging, as described above in Section 3.1. The proposed enhancements are meant to compliment the averaging strategy as well as offset the removal of two 10-inch red alder (Alnus rubra) trees at the top of the slope within the western wetland buffer boundary. The project arborist identified the two hazard trees as diseased and has recommended them for removal. The trees will be cut off at or near the ground surface, leaving the root ball intact and avoiding earth disturbance. The proposed enhancement plan consists of dense plantings of native shrub and fern species in the currently bare areas adjacent to the eastern wetland boundary. These areas were selected because although they are shaded by a forest of Western red cedar they have limited shrub and ground cover and are in a part of the buffer that would most benefit from the enhancements (Photos 1 and 2). Our wetland buffer enhancement will provide greater vegetation structure and wildlife habitat and will improve screening for the wetland. To provide continuity and to increase the planting success, the plant species selected for the enhancement area include native species already thriving in the wetland buffer and surrounding area (Figure 3). These species have also been used successfully in similar wetland buffer planting projects. The wetland buffer enhancement plan includes removal of existing patches of English holly (Ilex aquifolium) from the planting areas (See Section 4.2 below and planting note 2 on Figure 3). 21-1-22082-006-R1f/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 5 The wetland buffer enhancement plan also includes placing large woody debris (LWD) around the outer borders of the planting areas to discourage disturbance and to provide insect, passerine bird, and small mammal habitat (Figure 3). In total, the wetland buffer enhancement area is approximately 1,380 square feet. The proposed wetland buffer enhancement plan will increase wetland and wetland buffer function and value in an area where existing buffer vegetation is inadequate by providing the following ecological benefits:  Increased woody species at the wetland boundary will help contribute woody debris and other organic material to the wetland;  Invasive species will be replaced by native species in the planting areas;  Native woody vegetation will provide wildlife habitat, forage, and cover for birds and small mammals; and  Increased vegetation in the planting areas will filter pollutants in surface water runoff through capturing of mobilized sediment, phytoextraction, transpiration, and soil microbial interactions. 4.2 Wetland Buffer Enhancement Sequence The sequence below summarizes the steps that should be taken to implement the wetland buffer enhancement plan. Additional detail can be found in the Planting Notes section of Figure 3. A. A wetland biologist will re-flag or stake the eastern wetland B boundary in the vicinity of the enhancement areas prior to the start of enhancement work. B. Install erosion control Best Management Practices (BMPs) and protect existing native woody vegetation in and adjacent to the planting areas. Earth disturbance should be minimized to the extent possible to avoid damaging existing tree roots in the area. C. Remove existing non-native invasive species such as English holly (Ilex aquifolium) from the planting areas using a combination of hand pulling, cutting, and application of triclopyr or similar, depending on size of individuals. Relocate existing downed woody debris within the site to locations outside of the enhancement areas, to be replaced and reoriented following plant installation. D. Place LWD along the boundaries of the enhancement areas. LWD must be at least 12 inches in diameter. Existing downed woody debris that was removed from the site prior to planting may be used in this delineation, if size criteria is met. E. Procure plants and store properly. Biologist shall review plant material and plant layout prior to planting. Install plants by hand in the planting areas in natural, random clusters. Planting should occur between September 15 and January 15 to take advantage of cool temperatures and precipitation. 21-1-22082-006-R1f/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 6 F. Mix 3 inches of compost into soil at plant pits and hand-dig circular plant pits. Take care to avoid cutting through existing native tree roots. Backfill with native soil/compost mix. G. Water plants thoroughly after planting to avoid capillary stress. H. Mulch the wetland buffer enhancement areas with 4 to 6 inches of wood chips to discourage weed establishment. I. Remove construction debris. Remove BMPs after site is stabilized. 4.3 Maintenance The contractor will be responsible for maintenance of the enhancement areas for the first year following installation. The District will be responsible for maintenance of the enhancement area for the remaining four years of the monitoring period (see Section 4.4). Maintenance will include watering during the first dry season following planting, weeding around base of installed plants, pruning, replacing plants to meet survival requirements (see Section 4.5), removing all classes of noxious weeds (see Washington State Noxious Weeds List, Washington Administrative Code 16-750-005), and implementing any other measures needed to ensure plant survival. All proposed maintenance shall be reviewed by the biologist. Water shall be provided to installed plants during the dry season (June 1 through October 15) for the first year after plant installation to enhance plant survival and establishment. Water should be applied at a rate of one inch of water, once per week. 4.4 Monitoring Plan Monitoring shall be conducted in years 1, 3, and 5 following installation of the enhancement areas (ECDC 23.40). Below we have outlined proposed monitoring methods, success criteria, and reporting schedule. Monitoring will be conducted by a qualified biologist and will consist of documenting plant mortality in the first year after installation and estimating plant cover thereafter. Monitoring will also include identifying maintenance needs as they relate to plant survival and weed control. Monitoring will be conducted soon after installation to document baseline conditions and in years 1, 3, and 5 to assess whether the site is meeting the success criteria in Section 4.5. A. Baseline Documentation. Within 30 days of completion of the vegetation enhancement installation, the site will be visited to document the as-built condition. The final plant count by species will be verified, and any approved departures from the plan will be mapped and recorded. Recommendations for correcting any unauthorized plan deviations will be included in a Baseline Monitoring Report. Permanent photo points will be established during the as-built site visit to provide a 21-1-22082-006-R1f/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 7 record of the entire monitoring area. These points will be noted on the map and baseline photos included in the report. B. Vegetation Monitoring. ― Year 1: Each installed plant will be assessed and counted, and its condition recorded. Invasive species cover will be visually estimated. ― Years 3 and 5: Total percent cover of native shrub and fern/ground cover species and percent cover of invasive species will be visually estimated. Native volunteer species may be counted in the cover assessment. ― All vegetation monitoring shall occur between May 15 and September 30 (prior to leaf drop), unless otherwise specified. ― Photos of the vegetation enhancement shall be taken from consistent locations established during baseline monitoring. The monitoring reports will include: A. Reports. Monitoring reports shall be submitted to the City December 31 of each reporting year (baseline and years 1, 3, and 5). Monitoring reports will include the following description/data: 1. Site plan and location map. 2. History of project, including date of plant installation, current year of monitoring, and restatement of performance standards. 3. Plant survival and/or cover and vigor of the installed vegetation, in the context of assessing achievement of performance standards. 4. Observed wildlife, including amphibians and birds. 5. Assessment of nuisance/exotic biota and recommendations for management. 6. Color photographs taken from permanent photo points established during the as- built visit. 7. Summary of maintenance and contingency measures proposed for the next season and completed for the past season. B. Deficiencies. Any deficiency discovered during any monitoring or inspection visit must be corrected within 60 days. C. Contingency Plan. If any monitoring report reveals that the enhancement plan has failed in whole or in part, and if that failure is beyond the scope of routine maintenance, a Contingency Plan shall be prepared and submitted. The Contingency Plan may range in complexity from a list of plants substituted to cross-sections of proposed engineered structures. Once approved, contingency measures may be installed and will replace the approved wetland buffer enhancement plan. 21-1-22082-006-R1f/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 8 4.5 Performance Standards Plant survival and cover standards are established to measure enhancement plan success. The proposed performance standards are summarized in Table 1. TABLE 1 VEGETATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Monitoring Year Survival (%) Native Cover (%)* Invasive/Non-native Cover (%)** Year 1 100 -- ≤10 Year 3 -- ≥20 ≤10 Year 5 -- ≥50 ≤10 Notes: * Includes native plants in that category that are naturally recruiting. ** Applies to all exotic invasive species. If weed cover exceeds 10 % during vegetation monitoring, this performance standard can be met by removing weeds within 60 days of vegetation monitoring. 100 percent (%) survival criteria shall be met by replacing all mortalities the first year after planting. ≥ = greater than or equal to 5.0 CLOSURE This report has been prepared for specific application to the New Madrona K-8 project. This report has been developed in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. The wetland buffer averaging and enhancement approach presented in this report incorporates professional opinions based on interpretation of information currently available to us, and was completed within the operational scope, budget, and schedule constraints of this project. No warranty, express or implied, is made. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the District and its representatives. We have prepared Appendix B, “Important Information About Your Wetland Delineation/Mitigation 21-1-22082-006-R1f/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 10 6.0 REFERENCES Edmonds, Wash., 2016, Wetlands: Edmonds, Wash., City Code and Development Code Title 23.50, available: http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Edmonds/. Shannon & Wilson, Inc., (Shannon & Wilson), 2016, Revised wetland and stream delineation report for new Madrona K-8 project, City of Edmonds, Washington: Report prepared by Shannon & Wilson, Inc., Seattle, Wash., 21-1-22082-002, for City of Edmonds School District, Edmonds, Wash., August, 94 p. 104 NE 205th St 238th St SW 236th St SW 240th St SW Lake Ballinger PROJECT LOCATION 99 5 VICINITY MAP FIG. 1 New Madrona K-8 Project Edmonds, Washington Map adapted from aerial imagery provided by Google Earth Pro, reproduced by permission JUDQWHGE\*RRJOH(DUWKŒ0DSSLQJ6HUYLFH NOTE September 2016 21-1-22082-006 Fi l e n a m e : J : \ 2 1 1 \ 2 2 0 8 2 - 0 0 2 \ 2 1 - 1 - 2 2 0 8 2 - 0 0 2 F i g 1 - V i c m a p . d w g D a t e : 0 9 - 0 2 - 2 0 1 5 L o g i n : S A C Seattle Tacoma Washington Project Location 90 5 MT 97 0 2,000 4,000 Approximate Scale in Feet Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community New Madrona K-8 Project Edmonds, Washington WETLAND BUFFERAVERAGING PLAN FIG. 2 September 2016 21-22082-006 Fi l e n a m e : I : \ W I P \ 2 1 - 1 \ 2 2 0 8 2 M a d r o n a K - 8 \ G I S \ M X D \ B u f f e r A v e r a g i n g P l a n . m x d D a t e : 9 / 1 6 / 2 0 1 6 b e o WE T L A N D B ( C A T . I I I ) PR O P O S E D BU I L D I N G S 60-ft Standard Buffer 240TH STREET SW 238TH ST SW 91 P L W 0 100 20050 Feet µ 60-ft Standard Buffer 60-ft Standard Buffer Proposed Buffer Proposed Buffer Proposed Wetland Buffer (width varies and is not less than 45-ft wide) 60-ft Standard Wetland Buffer Width Proposed Buffer Reduction (3,835 sq. ft.) Proposed Buffer Expansion (3,835 sq. ft.) P!P!P! ®! ®! ®!®! ÎÎÎ P! P!P! ®! ®!®! ÎÎÎ P!P!P!P! ®! ®! ®! ÎÎÎÎ P!P!P! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! P!®! P! P! P! Î P! Î P! ®! Î ®! ®! ®! ®! P! Î P! P! Î Î ®! ®! ή!Î P!Î Î P! Î ÎÎÎ P!P! ®! ®!®!P! P! ÎÎή!®!ÎÎ ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®!®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®!®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®!®!®! ®!®! ®!®!®!®! ®!®! ®!®!®!®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®!®!®!®!®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®!®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®!®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! ®! WETLAND B 89-FT WETLAND B 18-FT 13-FT 13-FT AREA 1Approximate Buffer Enhancement Location AREA 2Approximate Buffer Enhancement Location New Madrona K-8 ProjectEdmonds, Washin gton WETLAND BUFFERENHANCEMENT PLAN FIG. 3 Se pte mb er 20 16 21-2208 2-006 Filename: I:\WIP\21-1\22082 Madrona K-8\GIS\MXD\BufferEnhancementPlan.mxd Date: 9/16/2016 beo A WETLAN D BIOLOGIST WILL REFLAG OR STAK ETHE EASTERN WETLAND B BOUND ARY IN THEVICINITY OF THE ENHA NCEMENT AREAS PRIOR TOTHE START OF ENHANCEMENT WORK. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENTPRACTICES AND PR OTECT EXISTING NATIVEWOODY VEGETATION IN AND AD JACENT TO THEPLANTING AREAS. EAR TH DISTUR BANCE SHOULDBE MINIMIZED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE TO AVOIDDAMAGING EXISTING TREE ROOTS IN THE AR EA. REMOVE EXISTING NON-NATIVE INVASIVE SPECIESFROM PLANTING AREAS, INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO ENGLISH HOLLY (ILEX AQU IFOLIUM).SMALL IN DIVIDUALS OF ENGLISH HOLLY SHOU LDBE HAN D PULLED AND LARGE INDIVIDUALSSHOULD BE C UT OFF AT OR NEAR GROUND LEVELAND TRICLOPYR OR SIMILAR SHALL BEIMMEDIATELY A PPLIED TO CUT STEM BY APESTICIDE APPLICATOR WITH A VA LID WA STATEDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PESTICID EINSPECTOR LICENSE. RELOC ATE EXISTINGDOWNED WOOD Y D EBRIS IN THE PLA NTING A REASOUTSIDE OF THE ENHA NCEMENT AREAS, TO BEREPLACED AN D REORIENTED FOLLOWING PLANTINSTALLATION. PLACE LAR GE WOODY DEBRIS (LWD ) ALONG THEBOUNDARIES OF THE BUFFER ENHAN CEMENTAREAS. LWD MUST BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES INDIAMETER. EXISTING WOOD Y D EBRIS THAT WA SREMOVED FROM THE ENHANCEMENT AREASPRIOR TO PLAN TING MAY B E USED IN THISDELINEATION, IF SIZE C RITERIA IS MET. PROCURE PLA NTS A ND STORE PROPERLY.PLANTS SHALL CON FORM TO THE COD E OFSTANDARDS OF THE A MERICAN A SSOCIATION OFNURSERYMEN. PLANT MATERIA L WILL BE NATIVETO THE PA CIFIC NORTHWEST AN D FROM PLANTSTOCK GENOMES FR OM WESTER N WASHIN GTON.BIOLOGIST SHALL R EVIEW PLANT MATERIALPRIOR TO PLAN TING. BIOLOGIST RESERVES THERIGHT TO REQUIR E REPLACEMENT ORSUBSTITUTION OF PLANTS DEEMED UNSUITABLE. INSTALL PLAN TS BY HAND IN TH E PLANTINGAREAS IN N ATURAL, RANDOM C LUSTERS. PLANTLAYOUT SHA LL BE REVIEWED BY BIOLOGISTPRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANTS. IF POSSIBLE,PLANTING SHOULD OCCUR B ETWEEN SEPTEMBER15 AND JANUARY 15 TO TAKE ADVANTA GE OFCOOL TEMPERATURES AND PRECIPITATION.PLANTS SHOULD BE INSTALLED THE SAME D AY THEY ARE DELIVER ED TO THE SITE. PLANTS THATARE NOT INSTALLED ON THE DAY OF D ELIVERY TOTHE SITE SHA LL BE HEELED INTO THE SOIL IN ASHADED LOCATION FOR PROTECTION AGAINSTDRYING. MIX 3 INC HES OF COMPOST (CEDAR GR OVECOMPOST OR EQUIVA LENT) IN TO THE SOIL ATPLANT PITS. HAN D-DIG C IRCULAR PLANT PITSWITH VERTIC AL SIDES AND INSTALL PLANTS,TA KING CA RE TO AVOID CUTTING THROUGHEXISTING NATIVE TREE ROOTS. BACKFILL WITHNATIVE SOIL/COMPOST MIX. WATER PLANTS THOROUGH LY TO AVOIDCAPILLARY STRESS. PLANTED AREAS SH ALL BEWATERED WITH APPROXIMATELY 1 INCH OF WATERIMMEDIATELY A FTER PLANTING. MULCH THE B UFFER EN HANCEMEN T AREA WITH 4TO 6 INCHES OF WOOD C HIPS TO DISC OURAGEWEED ESTA BLISHMENT. REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. REMOVEEROSION CONTR OL BMPS AFTER SITE ISSTABILIZED. LANDSCAPER SHALL SUBMIT A COPIES OF TH EPLANTING INVOIC ES SHOWING PLANTED SPECIESAND QUANTITIES. THE PLANTED AR EAS SHALL BE WATERED WITH 1-INCH OF WATER ON CE PER WEEK DURING THE DRYSEASON (JUNE 1 THROUGH OCTOBER 15) FOR THEFIRST YEAR A FTER PLANT INSTALLATION . LANDSCAPER SHALL REPLACE ALL PLANTMORTALITIES A ND PERFORM MAINTENA NCE FORONE YEAR A FTER INSTALLATION. PLAN TING NOTES 0 20 4010 Feet PLAN T SPECIES, QUANTITY, SIZE, AND SPACING 1. Quantity is based on an estimated planting area of 1,380 square feet.2 O.C. = cumulative on center S ymbol Common Name Scientific Name Quantity1 Spacing2 Size Condition salal Gaultheria shallon 30 >12 inches 1-gallo n co ntainer Oregon grape Mahonia nervosa 30 >12 inches 1-gallo n co ntainer Indian plum Oemleria cerasiformis 26 >24 inches 1-gallo n co ntainer sword fern Polystichum munitum 190 2.5 feet O.C.>12 inches 1-gallo n co ntainer 4 feet O.C. @ @ @ 888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 APPLY 4-6 INCHESOF MULCH. KEEPMULCH AWAY FROMPLANT STEMS TOPREVENT ROT. HAND DIGCIRCULAR PITSWITH VERTICALSIDES. 2X ROOTBALLWIDTH CON TAINER DETAIL (n .t.s.) Wetland B PROPOSEDBUILDINGS Parcel Boundary 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. ®! P! ®! Î 240TH STREET SW 238TH ST SW 91 PL W µ 12. 13. AREA 1 AREA 2 = Larg e Wood y De bris 21-1-22082-006 APPENDIX A WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA PHOTOS 21-1-22082-006-R1f-AA/wp/lkn 21-1-22082-006 Photo 1: A portion of buffer enhancement area 1, viewing northeast, taken on September 12, 2016. Photo 2: A portion of buffer enhancement area 2, with Wetland B shown on the left, viewing north, taken on September 12, 2016. 21-1-22082-006 APPENDIX B IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR WETLAND DELINEATION/MITIGATION AND/OR STREAM CLASSIFICATION REPORT Page 1 of 2 1/2016 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attachment to and part of Report 21-1-22082-006 Date: September 20, 2016 To: Ms. Taine Wilton Edmonds School District #15 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR WETLAND DELINEATION/MITIGATION AND/OR STREAM CLASSIFICATION REPORT A WETLAND/STREAM REPORT IS BASED ON PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS. Wetland delineation/mitigation and stream classification reports are based on a unique set of project-specific factors. These typically include the general nature of the project and property involved, its size, and its configuration; historical use and practice; the location of the project on the site and its orientation; and the level of additional risk the client assumed by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory program. The jurisdiction of any particular wetland/stream is determined by the regulatory authority(s) issuing the permit(s). As a result, one or more agencies will have jurisdiction over a particular wetland or stream with sometimes confusing regulations. It is necessary to involve a consultant who understands which agency(s) has jurisdiction over a particular wetland/stream and what the agency(s) permitting requirements are for that wetland/stream. To help reduce or avoid potential costly problems, have the consultant determine how any factors or regulations (which can change subsequent to the report) may affect the recommendations. Unless your consultant indicates otherwise, your report should not be used:  If the size or configuration of the proposed project is altered.  If the location or orientation of the proposed project is modified.  If there is a change of ownership.  For application to an adjacent site.  For construction at an adjacent site or on site.  Following floods, earthquakes, or other acts of nature. Wetland/stream consultants cannot accept responsibility for problems that may develop if they are not consulted after factors considered in their reports have changed. Therefore, it is incumbent upon you to notify your consultant of any factors that may have changed prior to submission of our final report. Wetland boundaries identified and stream classifications made by Shannon & Wilson are considered preliminary until validated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and/or the local jurisdictional agency. Validation by the regulating agency(s) provides a certification, usually written, that the wetland boundaries verified are the boundaries that will be regulated by the agency(s) until a specified date, or until the regulations are modified, and that the stream has been properly classified. Only the regulating agency(s) can provide this certification. MOST WETLAND/STREAM "FINDINGS" ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES. Site exploration identifies wetland/stream conditions at only those points where samples are taken and when they are taken, but the physical means of obtaining data preclude the determination of precise conditions. Consequently, the information obtained is intended to be sufficiently accurate for design, but is subject to interpretation. Additionally, data derived through sampling and subsequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by the consultant who then renders an opinion about overall conditions, the likely reaction to proposed construction activity, and/or appropriate design. Even under optimal circumstances, actual conditions may differ from those thought to exist because no consultant, no matter how qualified, and no exploration program, no matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by earth, rock, and time. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help reduce their impacts. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their consultants through the construction or wetland mitigation/stream classification stage to identify variances, to conduct additional evaluations that may be needed, and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. Page 2 of 2 1/2016 WETLAND/STREAM CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE. Since natural systems are dynamic systems affected by both natural processes and human activities, changes in wetland boundaries and stream conditions may be expected. Therefore, delineated wetland boundaries and stream classifications cannot remain valid for an indefinite period of time. The Corps typically recognizes the validity of wetland delineations for a period of five years after completion. Some city and county agencies recognize the validity of wetland delineations for a period of two years. If a period of years have passed since the wetland/stream report was completed, the owner is advised to have the consultant reexamine the wetland/stream to determine if the classification is still accurate. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and natural events such as floods, earthquakes, or water fluctuations may also affect conditions and, thus, the continuing adequacy of the wetland/stream report. The consultant should be kept apprised of any such events and should be consulted to determine if additional evaluation is necessary. THE WETLAND/STREAM REPORT IS SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION. Costly problems can occur when plans are developed based on misinterpretation of a wetland/stream report. To help avoid these problems, the consultant should be retained to work with other appropriate professionals to explain relevant wetland, stream, geological, and other findings, and to review the adequacy of plans and specifications relative to these issues. DATA FORMS SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE REPORT. Final data forms are developed by the consultant based on interpretation of field sheets (assembled by site personnel) and laboratory evaluation of field samples. Only final data forms customarily are included in a report. These data forms should not, under any circumstances, be drawn for inclusion in other drawings because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. Although photographic reproduction eliminates this problem, it does nothing to reduce the possibility of misinterpreting the forms. When this occurs, delays, disputes, and unanticipated costs are frequently the result. To reduce the likelihood of data form misinterpretation, contractors, engineers, and planners should be given ready access to the complete report. Those who do not provide such access may proceed under the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming responsibility for the accuracy of information always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing the best available information to contractors, engineers, and planners helps prevent costly problems and the adversarial attitudes that aggravate them to a disproportionate scale. READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES CLOSELY. Because a wetland delineation/stream classification is based extensively on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against consultants. To help prevent this problem, consultants have developed a number of clauses for use in written transmittals. These are not exculpatory clauses designed to foist the consultant's liabilities onto someone else; rather, they are definitive clauses that identify where the consultant's responsibilities begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved recognize their individual responsibilities and take appropriate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in your report, and you are encouraged to read them closely. Your consultant will be pleased to give full and frank answers to your questions. THERE MAY BE OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO REDUCE RISK. Your co nsultant will be pleased to discuss other techniques or designs that can be employed to mitigate the risk of delays and to provide a variety of alternatives that may be beneficial to your project. Contact your consultant for further information.