Loading...
18140 84 Ave W information.pdfLj4-- kcx,(� �6 C�- A� pLuApe-O U,,\ V-iey ac It L) V-�-� /Ar Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client Date .31qlls TiME Address/Tree location qiLif) ig Li �j Tree no. Sheet of Tree species n!lt� C, t�)� uj:�, dbh Height 5V-&01' Crown spread dia. Assessor(s) Time frame Toolsused Target Assessment Target zo e Occupancy E E x'j X ;U rate -ra 0 -ji g Target description 61 2—occasional 3 — frequent U > 9 �Xq g 4 — constant 0 E (D 2 3 4 --------- rf VV141- (I Y tb kv Site Factors 7�5- History of failures L-j \,W Topography FlatO SlopeO 9&' 6 % Aspect_ Site changes None IR G�acle change 0 Site clearing 0 Changed soil hydrology 0 Root cuts 0 Describe ed Soil conditions Limited volume IR Saturated 0 Shallow 0 Compacted 11 Pavement over roots 11 % Describe Prevailing wind direction Common weather Strong winds P ice 0 Snow 0 Heavy rain q Describe Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low IR Normal 0 High 0 Foliage None (seasonal)FQ None(dead)O Normal % Chlorotic % NecroticW,--W% Pests Abiotic Species failure profile Branches [I-rr-unkE1'Root8Q-Describe Load Factors Windexposure ProtectedO PartialMI FuII0 Windfunnelingp Relative crown size SmaIII9 Medium(Z LargeO Crownclensity Sparsep NormallZI DenseO Interior branches Few)M NormalO Dense�O Vines/Mistletoe/Moss53 Recent or planned change in load factors v-�,!AVN [ k !�W cv- /Ij L­,-CVj I i4-- Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure — Crown and Branches Unbalanced crown 0--- LCR % Cracks 0— Lightning damage 0 Dead twigs/branches P ��% overall Max. dia. 6,�;I Codominant 0 Included bark6- Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments4D- Cavity/Nest holelify. circ. Over -extended branches 19' Pruning history Previous branch failures 03' Similar branches present 0 Crown cleaned 0 Thinned 0 Raised 0 Dead/Missing bark El- Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0— Reduced 0 Topped 0 Lion -tailed 0 Conks El--- Heartwood decay El -- Flush cuts 0 Other t-c — Response growth Main concern(s) I Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 11 Moderate 0 Significantfl-- Likelihood of failure Improbable 0 Possible 11 Probable 11 Imminent —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — �M Dead/Missing bark ET- Abnormal bark texture/color 0'- Collar buried/Not visible 0' Depth Stem girdling 0 El Codominantstems M- Included bark 0' Cracks Er- Dead 0 Decay Conks/Mushrooms n- Sapwood damage/decay EY'C'ankers/Galls/Burls 11 Sap ooze 11 ooze 0- Cavity 0 % circ. Lightning damage 0 Heartwood clecayn Conks/MushroomTEr-- Cracks EJ'- Cut/Damaged roots 0 Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth _ Poor taper 0 Root plate lifting 0 Soil weakness E3 Lean — * Corrected? "ev Response growth Response growth Main concern(s) Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 0 Moderate 13 Significant'g Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 11 Moderate 13 Significant 0 Likelihood of failure A�, I �ikellihood of failure Impr P", inent Improbable[] Possible 0 Probable 11 Imminent* ba �bleE: ible �11 le 11 1 �mm Page I of 2 Risk Categorization E 0 0 u Tree part Conditions of concern t M 0. 0i U -ti U- -0 E t'w 9 Target protectio n Likelihood Consequences Risk 2 rating 72 u of part M r- (from ZW -CR An' Matrix 2) Failure Impact Failure & Impact (from Matrix 1) E .2 E w to E V-) I ?7 -g 2 3 4 1'2) >6 Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood of Failure Likelihood of Impacting Target Very IowT Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely I Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely I Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Failure & Impact Consequences of Failure Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low Low Low Notes, explanations, descriptions Mitigation options CA—t"-L IL L— C� 4vo C�,Um, o4 's 15�oLA-- Residual risk Residual risk -e-- Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low 0 Moderate 0 High [I Extremeig Work priority 10 2 0 3 0 *1b Overall residual risk Low 0 Moderate 11 High 0 Extreme)b Recommended inspection interval Y—V Data 1P Final 0 Preliminary Advanced assessment neededfgNo E]Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations-ipNone ElVisibility OAccess []Vines ORoot collar buried Describe ('�- r-e'v vv%' This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists — 2013 Page 2 of 2 ISABasic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client erv�k, VA r3c'r-04 � d �,- Date Time Address/Tree location I qjLJO Q 1jL- 4,,, Tree no. - Sheet — of Tree species dbh Height S-6-GOt Crown spread dia. 24-W Assessor(s) '�'A) -&40L�A Time frame Toolsused Target Assessment Target zone Occupancy cu E 4j X rate I —rare 0 Target description Ll x 61 2 occasiona I 3 — frequent r, a) Q > r 'q 4—constant 0 2 3 4 VAL— IY i�,6 Site Factors 71b History of failures LJ XtZi Topography FlatO Slope]2� V/S Z % Aspect_ Site changes None ER G�acle change 0 Site clearing 0 Changed soil hydrology 0 Root cuts 0 Describe qj��� o-4-w--e Soil conditions Limited volume IR Saturated 11 Shallow 11 Compacted El Pavement over roots 0 % Describe Prevailing wind direction Common weather Strong winds IP ice 0 Snow 0 Heavy rain V Describe Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low IP Normal 0 High 0 Foliage None (seasonal)�g None(dead)O Normal % Chlorotic % NecroticSZ�-O% Pests Abiotic Species failure profile Branches ED-Tr-unkErRoots-G-Describe Load Factors Windexposure ProtectedD Partial" FuII0 Windfunnelingpg Crowndensity Sparselp NormaI0 DenseO interior branches Few)M NormalD DenseO Recent or planned change in load factors Relative crown size SmallER Medium[S LargeO fines/Mistietoe/Moss $3 Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure - Crown and Branches - Unbalanced crown 0-'- LCR % Cracks 13' Lightning damage 0 Dead twigs/branches overall Max. dia. 6,-19 Codominant 0 Included bark '1�7 Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Over -extended branches 2- Weak attachments4a- Cavity/Nest holeI6��% circ. Pruning history Previous branch failures 8' Similar branches present 0 Crown cleaned 0 Thinned 0 Raised 0 Dead/Missing bark F3- Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0-- Reduced 0 Topped 0 Lion -tailed D Conks E�� Heartwood decay 2— Flush cuts 0 Other ­0 Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 0 Moderate 0 Significantq'f- Likelihood of failure Improbable D Possible 0 Probable 11 Imminent c —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark ET- Abnormal bark texture/color Er� Collar buried/Not visible 0' Depth Stem girdling 0 Codominant stems 01- included bark IR' Cracks Er- Dead 0 Decay 0- Conks/Mushrooms n'- Sapwood damage/decay El"Clankers/Galls/Burls 0 Sap ooze 0 T, ooze Eg- Cavity 0 % circ. Lightning damageO Heartwood decayO Conks/MushroomTET-" Cracks El" Cut/Damaged roots 0 Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth _ Poor taper 0 Root plate lifting 0 Soil weakness 0 Lean — . Corrected? V­ev Response growth Response growth Main concern(s) 'E 'I Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A 13 Minor 0 Moderate 0 Significarittl Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 0 Moderate 0 Significant Er-' Likelihood of failure A,\JLikelihood of failure I� mpro �ilu Improbable 0 Possible 0 Probable 11 Imminent* bableol Posible �OP�robabl, �01�mmdinent �E-� Page I of 2 Risk Categorization Likelihood E W M Failure & Impact Failure Impact Consequences 0i U E (from Matrix 1) Risk 0 Conditions W M 41 M E Target 2 (U ff—E.-- M rating — = C of part 'Q *E 0 0 u Tree part of concern M a. fu LL E E protection 2: E 0 (A M c > (from Gj I Z tn (A Matrix 2) 2 3 4 Matrix/. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood of Failure Likelihood of Impacting Target Very 10, =ow Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhatlikelyl Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely 1 Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely I Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely —1 Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Failure & Impact Consequences of Failure Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhatlikely Low Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low I Low Low Notes, explanations, descriptions 10�AL Mitigation options 0�- A-zJ ai-k "Y AV, o G\9C Overall tree risk rating Low 11 Moderate 13 High 0 Extrerneig Overall residual risk Low 11 Moderate 0 High 0 Extreme)b 1-cAl -5-o-01%— Residual risk 23' Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Work priority 10 2 0 3 0 A Recommended inspection interval V—V Data'rlFinal OPreliminary Advanced assessment needed jRNo E]Yes-Type/Reason r Inspection limitationslpNone OVisibility OAccess OVines ORoot collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the international Society ofArboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment QuAified (TRAQ) arborists — 2013 Page 2 of 2 JSJJ Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client 1/,2— uc-" 4­� a L, Date 3141ts- Time Address/Tree location I qlLif) ig ci'-- AL LJ Tree no. - Sheet —of - Tree species !2NW-6-4 C (��j dbh Height 5-6-toOl' Crown spread dia. Assessor(s) 6kt:—,,— '?/U —&Lj0U�A Time frame Tools I Target Assessment Target zone I Occupancy j r- W E .5 E X :E rate I -rare -0 10 r. C Target description x Lq 2-accasional 3 - frequent Q r; 0) U > -C t; 4 - constant 0 E W 2 3 4 Lo W1 Y Site Factors .7�9 History of failures ��,j 0-4 Topography FlatO SlopeO 9L Z % Aspect_ Site changes None ER Grade change 0 Site clearing 0 Changed soil hydrology 0 Root cuts 0 Describe Soil conditions Limited volume IR Saturated 0 Shallow 0 Compacted 11 Pavement over roots El % Describe Prevailing wind direction 5 (A) Common weather Strong winds IP Ice 11 Snow 0 Heavy rain V Describe Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low IP Normal 0 High 0 Foliage None (seasonal)jg None (dead) 0 Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic�W-20% Pests Ablotic Species failure profile Branches [9-TrUnk F3' Roots-12--Describe AA 4, lfq-L-� c,,- V-Z," 41611" Load Factors Winclexposure ProtectedD Partialp] FuII0 Windfunnelingm Relative crown size SmaII19 Medium[O LargeD Crownclensity Sparsel� NormaI0 DenseO Interiorbran ches Few)M Normal[] DenseO Vines/Mistietoe/MossP Recent or planned change in load factors- in5LA[%L,, ng"-, Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure — Crown and Branches Unbalanced crown M--- LCR % Cracks a— Lightning damage 0 Dead twigs/branches overall Max. dia. 6A Codominant 0 Included batkitt- Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments'a Cavity/Nest hole367 % cirt. Over -extended branches El-' Previous branch failures 8' Similar branches present 0 Pruning history Dead/Missing bark 9- Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0-- Crown cleaned 0 Thinned 0 Raised 0, Reduced 0 Topped 0 Lion -tailed 0 Conks EJ--- Heartwood decay 2' Flush cuts 0 Other ­011 Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 0 Moderate 0 Significantqr— Likelihood of failure Improbable 0 Possible 0 Probable 11 Imminent c —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark ET- Abnormal bark texture/color Collar buried/Not visible 0' Depth Stem girdling E03 Codominant stems 111— Included bark M' Cracks El--- Dead 0 Decay LI- Conks/Mushrooms n— Sapwood damage/decay El"Clankers/Galls/BurlsO Sap ooze 0 T Ooze 0- Cavity 0 % circ. Lightning damage IJ Heartwood decayO Conks/Mushroomslr� Cracks El'� Cut/Damaged roots 0 Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth_ Poor taper 0 Root plate lifting 0 Soil weakness 0 Lean — o Corrected? V7'0 Response growth Response growth Main concern(s) Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 0 Moderate 0 Significant8 Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 0 Moderate 0 Significant El---' Likelihood of failure A Likelihood of failure ImprobableD Possible 0 Probable El Imminent'O Improbable 171 Possible 11 Probable 0 Imminent Page I of 2 Risk Categorization Likelihood E Failure & Impact Failure Impact Consequences Qj E (from Matrix 1) 0 M 41 M Risk rating C Conditions Target .2 of part 0 u Tree part of concern M 0. 'ra U. E il, protection -t 2 >- 3 =0) C-A (from Z 'n Matrix 2) 2 3 4 1---IA- kv-e- AA'.Z 12) 150 1 1E J>6j Matrix/. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood of Failure Likelihood of Impacting Target Very low Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely 1 Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely I Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Failure & Impact Consequences of Failure Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate UnI ow I Low Low Low Notes, explanations, descriptions LIA4 Mitigation options S'(A.- .4 /1- 1. 1 -L. Overall tree risk rating Low El Moderate El High El Extremelp Overall residual risk --LowE] ModerateD HighEl Extreme'o wc'/L I '* '-" Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Workpriority 11:1 20 30 A Recommended inspection interval Y—V Data 'P Final 0 Preliminary Advanced assessment needed-PNo r-lYes-Type/Reason Inspection limitationsTNone DVisibility OAccess OVines ORoot collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the International Society ofArboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists - 20 13 Page 2 of 2 ISABasic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client -- &V, �, L, �,e, " , Date Time Address/Tree location ._ I q1LA() qkj�L- 4,0 L. Tree no. — Sheet — of Tree species dbh Height �6400'( Crown spread dia. 241-�O" ';W -ta404,A Time frame Tools used Assessor(s) Target Assessment Target zone Occupancy E :h! x a rate 1—rare 20 '10, C, 7E C Target description t 2—occasional 3 —frequent W > U -a rd C 4— onstant 12 0 6. E a) 1! 2 3 4 P41-41— 7, Site Factors '76 History of failures ��!j �-W Topography FlatO Slopea 9"0 % Aspect_ Site changes None ER G�acle change 0 Site clearing 0 Changed soil hydrology 0 Root cuts 0 Describe Soilconclitions Limited volume IR Saturated 0 ShallowO Compactecirl Pavement over roots 0 % Describe Prevailing wind direction Common weather Strong winds IP ice 0 Snowo Heavy rain V Describe Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low P Normal 0 High 0 Foliage None (seasonal)19 None (dead) 0 Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic�W-96% Pests Abiotic Species failure profile Branches U-Tr-unk Er Roots-93-Describe Alt Load Factors Wind exposure Protected 0 Partial [M Full 0 Wind funnelingJ3 Relative crown size SmallER MediumN LargeO Crowndensity Sparsef� NormalO DenseO interior branches Few)KI Normall1l DenseO Vines/Mistietoe/Moss5i Recent or planned change in load factors L--,ol Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure — Crown and Branches Unbalanced crown W--- LCR % Cracks Er— Lightning damage 0 Dead twigs/branches P overall Max. dia. 6-9 C.dominant 0 Included batk6-7 Broken/Hangers Number - Max. dia. Over -extended branches El- Weak attachments42- Cavity/Nest hole3&n% cifc. Pruning history Previous branch failures Er^ Similar branches present 0 Crown cleaned 0 Thinned 0 Raised 0 Dead/Missing bark Eg- Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0-- Reduced o Topped 0 Lion -tailed 0 Conks Er-- Heartwood decay 21 Flush cuts 0 Other ­0 I -AL Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 0 Moderate 0 Significantqr- --- �ooc Likelihood of failure Improbable D Possible 0 Probable 0 Imminent —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark ET- Abnormal bark texture/color 12� Collar buried/Not visible 0' Depth Stem girdling 0 Codominantstems 111- Included bark 01 Cracks Er-- Dead 0 Decay El- Conks/Mushrooms M� Sapwood damage/decay Ercankers/Galls/Buris 0 Sap ooze 0 Ooze E9- Cavity 0 % circ. Lightning damage 0 Heartwood decay El Conks/MushroomsiEr-- Cracks B" Cut/Damaged roots 0 Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth _ Poor taper 0 Root plate lifting 0 Soil weakness 0 Lean — . Corrected? V-m Response growth Response growth Main concern(s) Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 0 Moderate 0 Significant8 Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 0 Moderate 0 Significant Er� Likelihood of failure P:A, Likelihood of failure �o ' ImprobableO Possible 0 Probable 0 Imminentio ImprobableO Possible 0 Probable 0 Imminent Er--" Page I of 2 Risk Categorization Likelihood E -0 Failure & Impact Failure Impact Consequences 4) E (from Matrix 1) 0 N V0 .2� Risk C rating Conditions 4- W E .2 Target 2 P M of part 'Q 0 u Tree part of concern M LL 9 E E Z 2� protection A--: 0 (from W Z gp >W En V) Matrix 2) 2 3 t'T 4 1-2) X 1-1� I Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood of Failure Likelihood of Impacting Target Very low Low I Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Un'iikely Somewhat likely Likely 1 Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely I Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Failure & Impact Consequences of Failure Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate Low I Low Low Notes, explanations, descriptions Mitigation options Residual risk -L A-J� I-Zj ou A�& 0 cxvlc� -n� Residual risk U VL/ yt, I'dco— Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low 11 Moderate 13 High 1:1 Extreme"O Work priority 11:1 2 0 3 13 Overall residual risk Low 11 Moderate 11 High 11 Extreme)O Recommended inspection interval 4--D Data F Final 0 Preliminary Advanced assessment neededfgNo OYes-Type/Reason Inspection limitationsV None OVisibility OAccess OVines ORoot collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the International Society ofArboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists — 2013 Page 2 of 2 t