19-04-02 CHC ICC - Pre-application meeting questions.pdf(Continued on next page)
Miller Hayashi Architects LLC
118 N. 35th St.
Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98103
T 206 634 0177
F 206 634 0167
millerhayashi.com
CHC Edmonds - Integrated Care Center Expansion
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING QUESTIONS
Meeting Date: 4/11/2019 at 3:00 P.M.
Site address: 23320 HIGHWAY 99
EDMONDS, WA 98026
Parcel Number: 00576700002003
Zoning: CG
Building type: V-B (fully sprinklered)
Building size: 25,299 sf existing, 7,000 sf expansion
Occupancy type: B
Questions:
General:
1. Full breakdown of fees applicable to project, including:
a. Building permit
b. Planning fees
c. Transportation and park impact fees
d. Stormwater fees
e. Sewer and water utility fees
f. Other fees applicable to the project?
Zoning/planning:
1. Confirm approach to parking requirements per section 16.60.030 B of the
Edmonds Zoning code.
2. Confirm design review process is staff review, type I decision.
Building:
1. Overall review of expansion layout and plan
2. Are there any unique IBC requirements?
Fire:
1. Confirm fire flow requirements
Civil:
1. Civil Review Attendance – We’d like to have the same reviewer(s) for the pre-
application meeting as will perform the civil and stormwater review for the
project.
2. As part of the site redevelopment stormwater system design, in 2013, the
existing stormwater management system incorporated the following:
a. Pervious pavements;
b. Infiltrating Bioretention (rain gardens);
c. Wetvault detention (for flow control and water quality treatment);
d. Media Filters (for sensitive lake water quality treatment); and
e. Infiltration.
These elements combined to provide a system that met WWHM flow control for
durations exceedances and return periods up to and including the 100-yr/24-hr
storm. The system design included, in the sizing, an anticipated 10,775-sf of
future impervious areas, which is what the current proposal is anticipated to be.
Can the city please provide detailed guidance of expectations for application of
the 2104 SWMM requirements to this project? What are the specific sections of
the 2014 SWMM that the city will consider applicable? We want to know what
the city considers most important and applicable, rather than attempting to
interpret the SWMM from the perspective of the reviewer.
3. Based on initial conversations and a review of the 2014 SWMM, the applicable
requirements appear to be limited to incorporation of LID elements to the extent
feasible. Is that a correct assessment?
4. The 2013/2014 redevelopment included the following in the design:
a. Street frontage improvements;
b. Driveway and parking improvements;
c. Water and sewer improvements (per OVWSD);
d. Power, lighting and emergency power facilities;
e. Waste and recycling facilities; and Site landscaping.
Are there any other civil requirements that will be applied to this project?