Loading...
20000342.pdfDATE RECEIVED / I —.- PERMIT EXPIRESUSE PERMIT CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE NUMBER '1r p".• PERMIT APPLICATION A080RESS SUITE/APT. CONSTRUCTION PUT NAMEISUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. OWNER NAMEINAMEOF BUSINESS (::\+ `� ,j i. I'rr ... I .� .,r •F _':, 0...f LID FEE S MAILING ADDRESS ft.a p PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP v.rma R.qur.a ✓TELEPHONE 6W ,.- ❑pGQ EXISTING PROPOSED sbiw.Ik B.qulr.a M.rpreeM CITY ZIP 6; 4.o?n,L, y REQUIRED DEDICATION FT REQUIRED wla.pr..a..a METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED u NAME YES ❑ NO 0 S r ADDRESS — REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROVDRAINAGE ul - l CITY ZIP 1 TELEPHONE NAME 1 1:I n. !,I„l'ititi 'w•.", IJ,z v ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE ADDRESS r1 % U I i j -; •( I ` y' 1•FIRE REVIEWEDBY DATE Q CITY ZIP TELEPHONE ..1 ,1.. 19p J f ° F. 9'• f), ,1 ° -.. VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADEN INSION BOND m. RED 'PECTD POSTED OYES ONO STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY p I� i �.. v4. VR- ,! r� t. I 0 7+'0'4i . 1. 11 i.. .i BE TA REVIEW SfGN AREA HEIGHT 1 COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED < PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. 1 ll I-;; j", �1. YI��l.. I r, ,.�1 �1 `U ., ' E%P )� LOTCOVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT) mO FRONT UPSIDE REAR "' ` ❑ NEW 4 RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING/MECHY ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR i -10. COMPLIANCE OR ❑ AUDITION ❑ COMMEflCIAL ❑ CHANGE OF USE i O 0- REVIEWED BY DATE a --I3 ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT ❑ SIGN PARKING LOT AREA PUNNING REGO PROVIDED R=I Z FENCE p ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CVDS ❑ FT) S D Z ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER r. GARAGE ❑ RETAINING WALL �' RENEWAL i ❑ AR C y T o(TYPE OF USE BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) E%PLAIN: C CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION COQE OCCUPANT ! Ivi NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL ' . I AREAS I,. SPECIAL INrn SPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT OF DWEI.LIND ,+ I+ UNITS NUMBER 1 J REQUIRED LOAD ❑ YES 1 O I. STORIES" ry. DESCRIBEWORK TO BE DONE .0 .,.% lV •,.* .. 1.+ ). I,w:r `J r-.. '\ REMARKS z C PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108IFINAL INSPECTION REO'D S m rn. Z r -i fDll l � , z VALUATION FEE - y Z' PLAN CHECK FEE O i HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING 1 M m ; PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL THI$ PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BEGONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADINGIFILL OOMAIN(CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS. MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE e SEPARATE PERMISSION. STATE SURCHARGE a j': PERMIT APPLICATION: 10. DAYS n PERMIT LIMIT 1 YEAR • PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION �• ENG. INSPECTION FEE 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR NER SPOUSE, HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND BUCC RS CITYOF 1 IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF •L-pNOSCAPING { ,) AGENTS FROM ANY AND EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES. AND INSPECTIONFEE\ 1 ALLCLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RECEIPT i FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT ' ° DEEMED TO MODIFY,WAIVEOR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE o_ NOR LED NANYWAVTHE CITY'S ASILITYTO ENFORCE ANY OR PROVISION: RECEIPT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE:f ACKNOWLEDGE THAT] HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION: THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL I HEREBY GIVEN IB CORRECT: AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF Thle IPP11-ipn 1a.01 a permll until elpheB by the : CALL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSI'RUC- BUIMi, 00IPIal or his/her DepulY: entl Fees era paid. and PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO FOR INSPECTION ecelpl Is ecknOwlaEpetl iP epece Plue.,.rdaB. THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO .. IN VIOLATION OF WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OFFICU,I91SIGNA9URE DATE AGENT) DATE SIGNED (425) ,I,r1, ,.. \\, '�� SIGNATURE (OWNERIDR '.... 7/ 1-0220 RELEASE BY DATE EXT 333 ATTENTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 77•�.11221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERT(FI- ORIGINAL - FILE • YELLOW • INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK - OWNER GOLD •ASSESSOR ) Y SRB k LASN}:N NULLAYFEL R� 0436 �nj�"�•` - I �� _ ,FfIGmMe . �Ad•f alt � � 8�21.pj 47 ue aiiao twins seeenmcr � t', NE x•a�a— I "I' ,- m LQ, fir. � ca- ma- [Y O: 4.. ,f #svn Airy . 10 � \ L iIJW!Y WA-l) y C •H30 GIyY eAlmmCAi�na� M. f 4n`-',... _ /i wir a !.siesta g"'o` TBIry 1'L,,CE1W.E. WAs {� gyp./► � . �.`_R y x (aft � P•H'a- .naa,A i �e- ,..sfi,�rw UNINWId A9 GAON& �9��O� o""` ` APPROVED BY PLANNING h � o' EXPIRES ---a —O RECEIVED ElailBti' � On L" JUL 19 2009 PERMIT OOUNTER CITY COPY J i 'ROM HOWE 1ti4GINEERING PHONE NO. 425 BB1 1830 May. 08 2001 08:57RM P2 HOWE ENGINEERING �ouTn Wr4LL SUBJECT ✓OBAD v. �-� 0/ I" CONSULTING ENGINEERS ?8CJ7 E LK. SAMMAMISH N.E. JOG.v1.1jL•' Ad3iiYL/ ,', I.. SAMMAMISH, WA 99074 x KY �-� i SHEFT.�Zl �(1F_. Ft; I' t1j z 00 I 11> 1 -4-n co c m, U _ m o 0.. 0 �� r m Z 0 T. mm F 3 5 N 00o c 0) zn Ody weep A0k-C 6 ic^0til z 0 46 Az " m' a, I dr+*i, / eo, ek A � ,4 f 4�_ DotIvCi 09--aCk4,r.0 PERM Eg cool 1 RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 4 .e. COPY COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDE FICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference#: '77-39 agOg12 Grantor(s): (1) 4 J S44Z . A (2) A,4MUL 41VSA41 Additional on pg._ Grantee(s): City ofFdmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec S Twn Z 17" Rng_Qtr Sy✓ OR Lot i Block__ Q, _Plat -Z 3 4 O Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 51 3 f - 05 4 - 003 - goo y (2) _Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY: DATE: PAGE L OF Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: 01. DATE: L PAGE �_ OF 1. Description of Suluect ProTeM This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of _ zo ` /6o0S ems'" 014(e 4�/eST (insert street c0_i' ms address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: om m O I j U-.. - 0 Q O ci p' , See the attached paper for the legal descriptions of the property? -n D m m o C t �� Z 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site -i 4n (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the.City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical Cn' consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to O obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports m and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit rile number q0 (insert number) on file with the City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of APPROVED FOR AECORDIN BY: DATE: PAGH_ OF �rj the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmlem. The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or APPROVED FOR RECO INfl BY: DATE: b u PAGEOFF_ arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. insurance Requirement In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director X/has not (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the band. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. I 1 ' (1, o' II I„ i p m' m 0r OO C' m€ m z , 10 i D Z` i ifl? Co n T m a 0Fn cm, m o' .—zi � r, t. z a ;: ' ' 0 1 3F n m I APPROVED FOR RECO EVG: BY: DATE:WJ0190 PAGE 5 OF DONE this day of 1991. OWNER(S) By: By: By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) i ) ss: COUNTY OF f�ti3 ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that AAJoN6j ,, - 4ns4y r signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this < < day of aze-e i 1992, VQYYICS � /'FGAo I'- OTARY PUB IC My commission expires: C! v �p L:\TEMP\BUILDING\MEADOVACO V ENANT i APPROVED FOR RECORDWG: DATE:b_ PAGE OF DONE this �� day of , 199 y OWNER(S) By: By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thatO 2Z,6 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (hisAofree and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. u DATED this /0 day of nn M _,19p9 —Y S-, ------------ (� Q Noby RAM Mot* aA0= q, evir" nnw30.amt NOTARY PUBLIC Mycommissionexpires: L:\TEMP\HUILDINGWEADOw\CO VENANT EXHIBIT A That portion of Lots 7 and q, Block 59, Meadowdale Beach, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Edmonds for 75th Place West by deeds recorded under Recording Noe. 7906190311 through 7906190315, TOGETHER WITH a portion of abutting 75th Avenue West as vacated iby the City of Edmonds Ordinance No. 2073, recorded June 19, 1979 under Recording No. 7906190310, and a portion of 75th Place West as vacated under Ordinance No. 2799, recorded December 7, 1990 -I under Recording No. 9012070096, the whole being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 3; THENCE North 87.3514311 West along the North line thereof 10.33 feet to the Westerly line of the Easterly 10 feet of said block and the Westerly margin of 75th Place West, as established by said Ordinance No. 2799, being the point of beginning; THENCE South 16-5911711 West along said Westerly line and road margin 100.49 feet; THENCE North 87.3514311 West, parallel with the line common to said lots, 149.88 feet to intersect the Westerly margin of said vacated portion of 75th Avenue West at a point on the arc of a curve from which the center lies North 74"29139" West 5258.80 feet distant; THENCE Northerly along said Westerly margin and curve to the left through a central angle of 1*05.,081, an arc length of 99.64 feet to intersect the Westerly prolongation of the North line of said Lot 3; THENCE South 87-35143" East along said prolongation and said — North line a total distance of 153.52 feet to the point of -(ALSO KNOWN AS Parcel 1 of City of Edmonds Short Plat No. S-23-90 -recorded under Recording No. 9105020326). TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress and egress over and across that portion of abutting Lot 2 in said Block 59, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the above described parcel; THENCE North 87*35143-6 West along the line common to said parcel and said Lot 2 a distance of 15.00 feet;. THENCE North 16-59f17" East, par,.'.',' with the Westerly margin of 75th Place West, a distance of 15.00 feet; THENCE South 87035143" East, parallel with said common line, 15.00 feet to said road margin; THENCE South 16°59117" West along said road margin 15.00 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. 8214 064'3 VOL. 2779PA6EO144 I i f : i Zi k{ m m 0n C. rn 10 I C Z:. O 'n n � 5l, M m' 1->: O 6Fn' I } C CA Z O r 1 m � S { O: -d m' I ( �k i '� c �• 5��,. S L� CITY COPY UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEMENT o IN CONSIDERATION of mutual benefits, the undersigned, hereafter referred to as "Grantors", hereby grant to the City of Edmonds, Washington, a permanent easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of utilities and for public access and/or a pedestrian walkway over, across, through and below the following described property and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction and maintenance of said utility or utilities (together with the right of access to said easement at any time for the above stated purposes) and the right to improve said property for a pedestrian walkway and/or other public access. Grantor shall not construct any permanent structure on or over said easement. The easement and right-of-way herein granted is located in the City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington, and is more particularly described as set fortis on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. DATED this / day of (. c,� 1980. / /, /'�i `, \/ice !•': RECEWFO MAY 2 3 1980 Edmonds City Clerk -1- _I Ii r i i j I 0`l' 4,, m. rs 4 m0 1 f_ OC s =M ; 2; mm, 0 � p mm t i R I fin, I mm , 0, p I z`'{ W I j 0 m` { 7 k` A STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF Or: ttis day personally appeared before me — to me known to be the individual describ in and who ex cuted the within and foregoing instrument, and acknow- ledged that �, signed the same as il ,� free and voluntary act and deed foi the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of %Olt 1980. L y NOTARY P*B LIC in and f6r tr(e State of Washington, residing at STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. 'COUNTY OF 4 On this day personally appeared before mel_can in to me known to be the individual described and who eIxecuted the within and foregoing instrument, and acknow- ledged that signed the same free and voluntary act ............ and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. , 04, GIVEN under my hand and official seal this .L/ day of 1980. NOTARY PUBLIC in an or e State of Washington, resiing at STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual scribed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknow- ledged that signed the same as free and voluntary and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. RECEIVEr) MAY 2 3 1980 Edmonds City Clerk 8005290186 i GIVEN under my hand and official seal this S day of 1980. NOTARY PU LIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at WASHINGTON ) `'.-ATATH30� ss. L`O 47�xYi r , ' ) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknow- � ledged that signed the same as. - = free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this S day of 1980. ........ �v RecEEn ` t ".'! NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the = MAY 2 3 1980 State of Washington, residing d: .< a monds City Cierk P0p1�G +� 1 r .... ......... o y= o N 0 to O z -o 70 frl - •• t 8005290186 -3 VO! 16,0:"Or 27V EXHIBIT "A" � Z' O, i The easement and right-of-way hereby granted is located in the County of Snohomish, State of Washirigton, and is more particularly m o` i 4 described as follows: g All 75th Avenue 0; Oc that portion of -West and North Meadowdale _ Road northerly and westerly of the following.described line: m Beginning at a point 15 feet southerly, when measured at a C right angle to the northerly boundary of North Meadowdale. Road, of the intersection of the northerly boundary of North, � S5 Pieadowdale Road and the westerly boundary of 75th Place West,'. thence southwesterly parallel to and 15 feet from the northerly � boundary of said North Meadowdale Road to the intersection of^ m M,,. i. the easterly boundary of 75th Avenue West, thence continuing �. southwesterly, parallel to the northerly boundary of North Co Sc { Meadowdale Road extended southwesterly, to a point 15 feet easterly of the westerly boundary of 75th Avenue West, when measured at a right angle to the westerly boundary of said avenue, o thence southerly parallel to and 15 feet easterly of the westerly boundary of said 75th Avenue West to an intersection of a line; beginning at'the most southwesterly corner of Lot 7, Block 59, Plat; of Meadowdale Beach, thence northwesterly to a point of intersection of the westerly extension of the lot line common to Fs said lots 6 and 7 with the westerly boundary of said 75th': Avenue West, which is the end of this description. z, m, h RECEIVED MAY 2 31980 r; � f:dmonds City Clerk I R CF—IvE:0 j AN 2 6 1998 PERMIT COUNTER PLOT PLAN l2O— Lo/ f c, y. Sho,��/a� s-23-9oi erg... .-: •� -1' _ _•' �, • _. _... : .......... I ''. �ECO/� G17d/G'i' Vo/UMC 5 �''•��._. .---.._.._.• _. n aYaa�.✓aece. �� ' WASN/N C, r pN WA s J UL 15 z a� � l S--' �- • — �;.. _ _! �i gyp`'` -- _..� �" '-1 - :.ham" - . �` .. /f i • APPROVED BY'PtANNIN•G = el CIT V COP' _ __.._. '_�.,__�� ��. e6'`..__, i FIN-_ L PROJECT APPROVAL ..ORM TO:- DATE: - MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE _ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE Z 22 D Z e evcn PLANNING DIVISION DATE PROJECT AN S' SITE ADDRESS u0 PERMIT # X j 1 S Q-1 Z ADB# DATE INSPECTED DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED AiR S A field inspection was conducted to determine rural compliance with approved plans. Final approval denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of: GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED ❑ Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector 1. FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDINGSSUon actor by inspector Li Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given 1. 2. 3. RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL Date Sign ocaprvl.doc.l:temp:bldg:fonns I0/Ol CIT.y2r biiC S Nei I Ft Twelker and Associates, Inc. Consulting Soils Engineers RECEIVE© OCT 2 5 1996 610 Wheeler St., No. 404 Seattle, Washington 98199 PERMIT COUNTER October 7, 1996 DOWN DEC 12 1997 Al Ansari 9304 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Proposed SFR Construction aq_ i'6008'75th Place 1, Edmonds, WA. l Dear Mr. Ansari: At your request we have investigated the circumstances of proposed SFR at 16008 75th Place W., in Edmonds, Washington. We present herewith a report of our findings, conclusions and recommendations. Site Description The property is a parallelogram -shaped tract having a frontage on 75th Place W of 100 feet, and a depth of approximately 155 feet. It is bounded on the west by a vacated street right-of-way, beyond which lies the right-of-way of the Burlington Northern Railroad, and on the north and south by private property. The site slopes with moderate declivity from east to west, through a topographic relief of 40 feet. The site is presently undeveloped, and covered with native brush. Soil exposures are of random dumped fill and colluvium consisting of silt and silty sand. Subsurface Exploration In order to ascertain the nature of the soil units which comprise the site, we conducted a subsurface exploration consisting of two borings made with a hollow -stem power auger, at the locations shown on Fig. 1, attached. Samples of the soils encountered were taken at intervals of 5 feet, using the Standard Penetration Test, in which a 2-inch OD split - spoon sampler is driven into the undisturbed formation at the bottom of the boring with repeated AlAnsari October7,1996 Page 2 blows of a 140-lb hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler a given distances provides an indication of the consistency of the soil. Soil Conditions The logs of the test borings have been combined with topographic information to produce a geologic cross-section through the site, also shown in Figure 1, attached. Input from a number of explorations performed previously in the immediate vicinity by other engineers has also been reviewed, although not reproduced here, Six soil units have been identified from the exploratory effort which has been performed: these are described as (1) an upper unit of more or less discontinuous, miscellaneous fill having a thickness of 3 to 6 feet; (2) an underlying unit of loose fine sand (found only at the top of the hill) having a thickness of approximately 7 feet; (3) a unit of firm dark gray silt with a thickness of approximately 15 feet; (4) a unit of dense coarse sand with a thickness of 7 feet; (5) a unit of hard silt/clay with a known thickness of 10 feet (at the downhill side of the site, but not entirely penetrated at the uphill side); and (6) a lowermost unit very dense fine to medium sand, with a thickness in excess of 25 feet at the downhill side. Groundwater Table The test borings at the site (which were performed in July of 1994) encountered the groundwater table at Elev. 48t (at the upper end of the site) and Elev. 2 (at the lower end). Proposed Construction We understand that the site is be developed with a three-story, split level, single family residential structure having a footprint of approximately 3000 sq ft. The building will be centered between the side property lines, and located near the upper part of the lot. The building site is to be prepared with moderate excavations of up to seven or eight feet below existing grade. The Meadowdale "Slide Area" Information on the geologic and recent history of the Meadowdale area, as well as prognostications for the continued stability of the various parts of the area, is available in a report prepared by Roger Lowe and Associates, Inc., for the City of Edmonds, dated Oct. 16, 1979. The slide area has a length variously estimated at 2100 to 3400 feet (depending on topographic interpretations), and a width of 400 to 600 feet. The project is located near the southerly quarter point of the slide area, a short distance from the lower (westerly) margin. The history as related in the Lowe report refers to principal episodes of slide activity in the ? winter of 1946-47, and the winter of 1955-56. Minor or local episodes are also reported from 1948, the 1960's, and in the winter of 1970-71. Failure modes described in the Lowe report consist of (1) slumps, (2) debris slides, (3) debris avalanches, and (4) debris flows. A "slump" is defined (usually) as a mass of material which moves downward on a slope, with a backward rotation. A more common term for this phenomenon is "rotational slip" (or slide). The failure modes to which the term "debris" has been applied involve (presumably) masses of earth which have been loosened by previous slumping (or rendered vulnerable in some other . way). Most of the "debris" events have taken place on the steep slope which forms the head scarp of the slide area, located several hundred from the subject property. The Lowe report expresses the opinion that the slide was precipitated initially by shoreline erosion and reactivated from time to time by the infiltration of surface water. We are inclined to the opinion that subsurface hydrostatic pressures (which could be fed from distant recharge areas) may also contribute heavily to deep-seated failures. The Lowe report predicts the area z 0 1 0 m cm m0 �0 0n 3: m A D r_ O x m u, 0 0 r 3 Va �r a i r m S 2 m m Of this project to have a 95 per cent chance of undergoing Pa e 3 material" within a twenty five year period. material" is taken to 9 "ground failure in previously failed mean movement of a The expression "ground failure in Previous occasions (i.e., reactivation of mass of material previously failed a rotational slide),ich has moved on one or more Conclusions a construction at his site, mendations On the basis of our review of the circumstances we draw the following principal conclusions: of 1 • Project excavations will Probably although some y extend to the overconsolidated native soil units, below thePrepared be n-r exists that the preferred bearing units may lie several feet Which can be idea ed as fill, we Where bearing has been recommend that then excavation rfaces are prepared in material n removed, Foundations would then be constructed on the underlying or on structural fill Foundations continue until the fill reasonably clean sand, gravelly sand, or sand g native soil 2• Contact pressures of i 000 sf y gravel). footings should have a P width may be used in the design of spread foundations. All the making of the excavation w II greatly 16 inches. Inasmuch as the weight removed in vertical Will will be assured. Y exceed the weight of the house, excellent 3. Possibilit o enewed ids will provide adequate vertical supportActivit Although the soils which will be encouhtered located that a mass of earth whiculd conceiably shiftits osed ructure, the fa means that the house could be displaced frompositPositict that the site is meats in surfaate ce water management and subsurface ion. have apparently that improvee- effective in preventing a recurrence of ground movement. The area has number of severe water years (includin PParently been At this point it is difficult to sayg the one just survived a whether or Past) without significant damage. rota- tional sliding or block sliding) in the immediate area could occur. are able to state that slides of the debris or avalanche tyher pe are extremely unlikely at this �. t as tions A ainst Ground Move ment has been known to occur in thement On a number of occasions rotational move , ably off -level. The releveling of a large area, leaving operation; however, 9e house can be a very houses tilted and notice minimize the difficulty number of inexpensive awkward and expensive Y and expense of provisions at the time of construction can peripheral foundations be P the corrective effort. reaction for the jackin provided with a double footingWe recommend that the Coll can be releveied by needed to relevel the ' whose purpose is to provide a column from the footing house. The interior independent y the provision of a simple detail to allow disconnection of the Additional precautions g' followed by reconnection after the adjustment has been made. would consist of flexible utility connections and strengthening of the peripheral foundation walls. We should point out that if block occur here, the entire structure, together with its foundation elements would move as a single entity; co movement were to Y consequently, no benefit would accrue from the use of a Presence of a piling foundation would, on the other hand, releveling the structure. Pile foundation. The greatly complicate the task of -i —5 �a cm mO o 8c -49 m z O -- cz o-n T m rn OrN r 09 m v' Zr z z -i x z O m Al Ansari October 7 1996 Paae 4 5. Springs or seeps encountered during the site preparation should be provided with These be constructed by digging directly into the discharge positive drainage exits. may area as far as possible, and inserting a filter -wrapped perforated pipe, followed by the backfilling of the annular space with coarse washed sand (not open -void gravel). 6. Structures which are to support lateral earth pressures may be designed to support an equivalent fluid having a density of 35 pcf for level backfill. z 1 7. Base friction may be calculated from a Coefficient of Friction of 0.6 (ultimate). 0 8. Backfill of earth -retaining structures should be made with reasonably clean granular m _ material, except for the top two feet, which may be made with native impervious -fi Vi materials. c m 9. All below grade spaces (including retaining walls) should be provided with seepage filter pipes. The amount of water to be m o O c: protection in the form of -wrapped perforated in the subdrainage system will be very small; it may be allowed to discharge at m collected any convenient surface location. 10 cZ 10. All surface water (roof, driveway, patios, etc.) should be led to an approved point of surface water be led into foundation drains, o discharge; under no circumstances should 0 infiltration pits or dry wells. 11. We anticipate that the necessary excavations can be made with near -vertical slopes. however, be backfilled as soon as possible. Permanent cuts should be no m m m o r They should, steeper than 1 vertical to 1 horizontal, up to a height of 5 feet. Cuts greater than 5 feet n m' [ In height should be made 1 vertical to 1.75 horizontal. corn 12. Fills should be dressed to a permanent slope of 1 vertical to 2 horizontal. ;' We have reviewed the design drawing prepared by Howe Engineering and find them to be in con- �y v formalness with the recommendations contained herein. 4 We believe that the project shown in the Contract Drawings can be accomplished in accordance with, subject to the conditions contained herein, with pl 1 the recommendations set forth in this report, '{ minimal risk of instability on this site or on adjacent properties. m The precautions recommended in the foregoing paragraphs are intended to minimize the cost of in the event of a major earth slip of the kind which has been known to occur in this area. I releveling These precautions (which consist primarily of an extra set of spread footings) can have no adverse We also out that the features of ! influence whatever on the stability of this or other properties. point this which relate to work to be done in the siting or in substructure construction (e.g:, project regrading, earth retainage, landscaping, surface water management, etc.) will be of distinct benefit to be (or even expected) to local stability. Nothing which can be done locally, however, can guaranteed the kind of major earth slip which the Me adowdale area has been known to have experienced. prevent We are aware that many or most of the recommendations for the improvement of stability which were in the Roger Lowe report have been executed, thereby greatly reducing the possibility of a presented i i Al Ansan October 7 1996 Page 5 recurrence of large scale earth movement. The evaluation of the current statistical probability for site stability is therefore an extremely difficult matter; however, we estimate that the chances of significant rotational disturbance of the site within a 25-year period would be considerably less that 10 per cent. We shall be pleased to provide such additional information or advice as you may request in the balance of the design phase of this project, and to assist in the resolution of unforeseen difficulties at the time of construction. Very truly yours. N T WE, vI, wp4 W 5'11n1,� NEIL H. TWELKER AND ASSOC.. INC. by �Kf02— 0 RFctsa� ro Neil H. Twelker, Pres. Incl: Fig. 1 EXPIRES 31131 NHT:nt K. tS. I � t F O n m I k pm mo i OcOi � c " I m 1 J A z� r O a oFYI 0� m �COY j z, =f 1. N' t o m' `F a: - DAILY 4� F BRING No. 5U®5URFACE EXPL MION cooetb SHEET I €a; y61L H.TWl1KER AND ►+SSoG1ATEj O�PTH FIELD L«+ ! :� ^,,. F GO}�1'R,AGT NO. LpC,AT1 O N ®A-M 7 A) SHIFT 5 5 DRILL C.O. P( )2G,G VN).),?))TW FOREMA," .�fe-VE RICy ► 7; 1 'O . . ►q ZlD OF SP.NIPLIN6 SPz)T 5Ftoc J REMRa1ZlL5 SvnNr ? �Jv�7 2:1 9 A; 1-l�IJS �1 I (O cc' )5 �o C, D �� yti j r 1 C �q Sd O` r. S J Ty�Hivo hey 1 m t EA V)3: js fyit F)tl 0 a C M', lyr m z: f tJ Pc nips GJR{]V81i ,0� mm_ -TVP vF .s vim PLF, n�_.I r•. v Gc m r O 1 m W I I rat. 4�. I I I l I c� rrT C� 0 I ZO y S'y(-h VEny F,NE 5AV ? PL DAILY RE D SMFEY2 cfEAPW ION //2 DEPTH FIELD MVU& TWS-VEX To Ai A LMr -r NID C+4Tr 4 — _XrC-T" zs -- 43 1 ®ATE 7)2))9y SMFT� 1114SPECTOM _f> PRIL.L. C,(U- FOREM" RIC— ME,VKOV> 05 2 �/ SAMPLIMCa 30 16 .�q "-v C, C, 4 -W hr vu In rn c: rn 0 OCo) C, I01Y, rn z -4 X r rn. co rn m A, V5 to Z, o d o M Goq I L :5lJB5uP-FNc-F- EXPWRATION t<EJL. N.TWFJ...14F3t ARID ,9-fj§OC.►ATE� a fZ I N G No. o r. jl hi ( PTH FIELD LOC+ To AL- Anfwyln� - GONTRAGT NO. Z. -I �OGAT►O N O -1 i 1 1 i m [, ®ATE 7)x) A Y SHIFT h '� 13 cL� C�P�e�Y rflc�)u� =ate -11 i u INSPECTOR 6 }')CSC-f-nJ C' _ .'gyp •. m�110.. PRILL. C.O. f O F'ORF-M Ok" O C mz R1� 11ETp40A OF SAMPLING jo C Z: o t mM. i` ,..REMAc2►cS mm o - O Z CL i � c Z O m �h i, DA ILY REP(- ZT ELffiV a- 'Ut55UR.FNCE EXPLORA ON coowj:), SHEET 1/3 14VUL H.TWELKEn M10 P$50GlATE5, DEPTH FIELD L.OG TOLL d�N sP�aL LI QAo SAMPLE Gp►.07RA.CT No. �' `i 10 (F, t L LoGATIpN DA-M 7 ./2) 9 / s►+I FT '. INSPECTOR � i'�Ca¢tn DRILL Go. �C1.�Ll6flS uNtIMiT�P FOREMAN �i6vl< METHOD OF SP+MPLING 4 10 RE tnacticS SvH.,Y f>-1C)C) G Ivy ) t L)5 y s )y 9 o Fir�sC SnNI� w)vN SL,�7d9,-y mo,s"7� .- Awr9taw49, ap"N Cmy Syrt,,iTt-�� Mo)S'7' S}Gj� ci L 5 L� v e(\,y �) N E S ANO q SIN �3 t S)CT -7 h- AY M of �✓- Zo t m fir. cm m o 2 M m, A f, c2 1: mm O o C: z� O' ,. ?5 m I� 4: i E i i ELEV. �3V !UBSV szFACE EXPWRAT90N coow-- SHEET Z/3 DeFrr FIELD LOcT r N VUL. ". TWELKEM NOD ASSof-vATE5 . To A1, GpN'�1?�gGT N®. 5 5T 9 Z O SHIFTpA a-i DRILL C,O. - i, C: c;. ti a: FOREMAN 0 R I C> vEsey rno,sr O a w' In METHOD OF SAMPLING s True C O(Dy SANG pmzz 11 RNO 5/N" DZ "�'• s N - ' -REMhR6CS - H2V 'TRc3tL- O T _�,.: I m m o (n ! MO z �' i W C-i �oaansE sue' cow(L �' % lra 3� c�n�ay iry z 19 z 35 m i-{p"o cl CZ LWNb 2z 59 SII�NT�/ m-3T- vT!4'Y 37 H canO U(�ta� GL�Y -r—. c )RING No. 1 �A I Ly -�p d• EL 61/ Oa . f�i`7 9 F1HET 3�') �UB5uJf P+CMOM WOW, -FIELD L.00> 4,UL H.'[WM—KEX WD J4S5pGIATEaj T0 ii L ANSI I3 9 z2 (,I Gp�TRAGT N6. .7.�D L,OG mom r SNtFT f�Au INSPEC'ibR VV-IL.I_ C.O. FOREMl.P6 W-%C— ME'T"OIA of SI'.P'1PLIN4 REMARKS ryro��-r C�n�y c>rA� �wio oG OaSL�Nb 1i1Y1�111�IIRY'IS November 22, 1959 r.....ww,t:w,nkasw Mr. Roger C. M.Corkle Hawley 6 McCorkla 2121 Norcheosc Perkins Vay Seattle, Vashington 98155 Dear Mr. M.C.,kI.: Report Ceotethnlcnl Con......l on rrnpe..d Short Plat Block 59 of Meadowdale Rencl, Ed...do, Washington File 1411.001-R02 INTRODUCTION This report presents our finding, and opinions relative to resldentlnl d.ve Iop,ent of your property located in the 160DO and 16100 blacks of 75th Place Vest, In the Meadowdale Are• of Edmonds. Washington. The property a Includes existing Loem I through 10 of Rlock 29 of the plat of Mead —dale Reach, end Is shown In the attached Slty Plan and Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The subject property It located weor of 75ch Place Want, between that street and the Rutlingcon Northern Railroad right of way whlrh parallelo the shoreline of Puget Sound. The site extend• northward fro, 162nd Street W.at ' eo the (vacated) wratwnrd rxtenelon of North Meadowdale Rnnd. We understand ' the you propose to ahnrt plat the property as four lots 1, place of the ' oxl a tIng ID lets, po.slbly excluding the souchertuso•t portion of the property, and that you require Informetlon on site conditions that nay of fact residential development. Tht purpose of our servicoa 1s to prevlds you with information regarding geotechoital eondlelom at the site relative to residential davelopaenc of the property. Specifically, our scope of services includes: 1. Exploration of oubsurfaee soils and ground water conditions at the site by ».ns of one boring and I. test Fab (- AUTHORIZE® FOR RECORDING 1o"'sAn CITY OF EDMONDS n'4q.nt M1Ox,e, 6.1.netA N voi. 2d36PAGE lal BY f PAGE_ OF '( 9105OZO326 ° ) :- i is gI —77 ' SL' S®NOW03 :1O ).UO DNI00003H UOA o '.la9+V Pauw .apnl wT Pur 'ali• LPuv �% r , ®3idW3a .aa a>,l.n.a.. Dlu .0 •.na. °wn.a m a4a 8u{Lln.o Y111.14. J •.TD °1 . 4a '01 09 41 1 s+guru .lo•l Vulm.. T r to ran a47 uI Llts..Isd 'aaF• a41 3° uo Psed uaayano. .qi .1 •4adap 4aiw ....Ps•4 ul .....sau{ SIT. L.s9 9u1LIsaPun .,u •.u•P —1p— Lllrsaw9 cc:) m •l l•lna.. arga Io U01"Od sawl 042 puv 06001 Lll.aauaq 97 Pura .(Illy —_ . m 00 a4a to a••I 9 0o L s.d& •qL -Ill. Lug Jill. 9u7'(Is... pu.. La1D. ueosq 80, J° aaal yl 01 9 la ayl.uoa (11.S...2 1 7..43 1• ...13Tp... •..psn.q.y 1 K. ; •.Ipu.ddV a41 u7 p•sua.•ad u. 'Sulsoq = fn 1" rya pu. lid asal .43 1. .401 .,IS P.. ....2..d uola•soldxa •a.lan.gn. 0 Z aya to uoTadiaa.ap V '1 aan3ll uo uwoy. .. paayaol 9u,soq wo pu. .aid r 7ua xla J° curs. Lq pasold...... . IT. a42 a. cu0Dal Puoa »rlsnsgn5 j 1�' -aa1• a41 uNllw IT— aaa.w a1.Yn. 0 so aV.d... to •.as. ou pa .qo •A -IT.. u.4 to ... .... 441. .....2 y Lq LIuT•. Paa•aaga. •T -IT• .41 to aa.d usaa.awyano. aLL •Lasadosd aya 7=ll In to uolasod u3a43aou aya ul Llulv...aaa . onploap pur u asgnwa 101 r 4111 — •ysnsq Lq Lllsy.lsd pa3ua3aw sl nl. aqL 'all• a4a to uolasod uaayano. vqa n ul4aiw p.a.ao1 •ay •anaansay .nelw.sd • 70 .au.urra uola.punn7 .a vsaue> anq +•14 .141 a• -IT- •41 uo .aua.a.ead.l 1.4ao so "ulPilnq ou ....sa4L Z i a.aw.lano. •31 -au aaal O[ uo11..a13 Cla3wwTxoaddw oa sausoa 20r 13aou - A +al s.au aaal Oq uOP •na13 Ll.j..;.oSdd...I] 9ul9u.s 'a... aqa oa pnwuwop —I L }aays ap°u .ado, • Lasadosd aya ulyaiw ......, punoa9 9u 1. { l.. . ' Z r;. SNOILIONOO 3LIS 'u3i•ap u°laapunol pu, aua.dola.ap 431. Sol . - cuolavpua...oaas T.aau+x apu(.n.y •aop aaodas .Tya avanbas snot a. •se.awory Z ;b.. •.lo aauo> uolaosa puv 0V,ulwap aal. •asaddn. uufa.punol '9ulpu9 all. sol O �,� .. .uoiarpu aaw.oaas a17)a+d. aynllul leu .sup ... I av jo rdo.. 3.... Sd no f7 �t •rpuo.P3 J° L31D a4a Lq Pas{nbas .}s aaTa> a43 oa ITT a>adcas 411w sal. aqI I• .110y a41 to La1119•a. aya to uol3.nl•w3 •[ '! •Lasadosd a4a to aua.dola.ap l•lawp{.as oa au..alas ? +q L•. a.qa •apTlapual a..d qulpsr3as uoTavuoluT Io nal.a-d •L EFL `f; I 6261 'LL seg..e 91 rl •l+lao�aµ q L•,w.µ .. 51.L1111ii1P1��0.N) 1 .:P. x-i n i I m o N' CO.. 11., m o, Q C, C7' Z m' td m Z t1 O m3mn mmm c M. Zr- Z O C) m (hvlv�t� . C�l.11i;iixYm Hawley 6 M.C.rkle Itwevber 22, 1969 Page ) Croufd water seepage was not observed to any of the test pit. within the northern portion of the ate*, but ground water was encountered 1. the southern part of the site at depth. of 10 end 11 feet in teat pits I and 2, respectively. HISTORY nu .lie 1. let. t.d wi chin the Meadawdale Ia,d.lide cowpl ex. .n .eea In which .weer... large and ...11 ... III move.mt. hove he.,, documented for ever 40 years, and in which movement has undoubtedly occurred for many centuries. A general description of landslide eonditlant In this area 11 provided in a landslide hazard, report by Roger Inv Assoclates. Inc. (RIAI) In their -Final Report, Landslide Hazards Investigation. Yeadowdale Area, Edmonds, Washington,' dated October 16, 1979, The site that Is the subject of this comultation is located in an are elas.ifled in the 1979 RUI report as 04AW. This classification designer•. a landslide hazard from movement of prevlo..ly failed naeerfal, indicates that the failure would likely include a considerable depth of material, and esti.stes that there was . 90 percent probability of such a failure occurring during a 25-year pertnd. Portion. of the subject site have experienced ground movements within the past 20 year.. During the winter of t970-71, a landslide occurred In the southeastern portion of the site, with the head •carp of the slide extending 50 feet east of 75th Place West. This elide area reportedly experienced ) more inches of ground arovevent during the 5-year period between 1971 and 1976, and pavement cracks Indicate that within the past few years the embankment which supports 75th Place We.t has exporlenced a .,It -not of additional ground movement. During 1913.74, another landslide occurred In the northwestern part of the .its, vainly vIthln the area of the v.eae.d 75th A— West (Seaside Avenue) right of way. The 1979 landslide hazards map waa developed on the basis of condition, that existed prior to construction of the Meadow Mle mevFr inj storm r� duirug. project. Th. relative landslide h... Id wa rh value d gad OPOZED our firm and we concluded that the conditions which exLcFCffRfECMDING hard..., due pri..rily 1. . declining water ab WY1611 ENAOND$ BY �i1U502U:3zU PACs 7- OF_ f U / .. .. n rl ��. ❑ .. r_. 1 �ilVl��l:lll;IlR'('f� I iti,, Hawley 6 N<Corkle t( Hovewber 22, 1989 Z: Peg • ♦ installation of store and sanitary seven. However, eon• risk of O- I' land eliding still exists. we concluded that ae or 1985. the risk of land- m q sliding as evaluated and cI,sslfLed in the RLAI report had been reduced to I approximately 30 percent probability of failure In a 25-year period. —i ro Observations of greund eater levels in nearly monitoring Wells during the course or this consultation confirm that the water table In the vicinity of O 1, the site hea declined to levels coenensurete with this lover risk. m cONCL.US10:1S AND RECOMMENDATIONS 0 C' in our opinion, the property is suitable for residential development m IM ` provided adequate c and practice In the design and construction of io drainage, earchvork,ae cructural walls .nd [oundatlons are rwployed, These C Z ' measures will woke tl,• Iota within this property ^ore expensive to develop than siwtlar houses on lots without the conditions and history of ground movements that occur within this area. However. It !a pus•thlr to develop n'� c` lots within this property for residential use In a wanner that will nor _ seduce the stability of the site, or adjacent erne. during or following m m. site develop went. -- The racerlal that uederllee the ales has previously been Involved In 0 r m landallding. The risk of reoccurrence of such a landslide has been reduced 0) - by the declining water table In the area. This Water table decline has Z r`. - been caused, at least In part, by Implementation of a scorn and sanitary �; �• system. The risk reduction will remain as long as the overall storm �. F :over and sanitary drainage system Is functioning effectively. The risk level may further decline as development progreaaes, if that development includes Z more efficient drainage .eaaur,s, The general reeew.endn clan. in this report are directed t•:vard avoiding , . _ - loeslited nlap* stability problems and elnlmiting damage to residences Z O within the .ate In the event that significant movewents occur. Large excavation. or [Ills placed within the site could cancolvahly m reducs the stability of the atn or adjacent ere an. ; r affeete, the net result of any •/te grading thou I d min1,.AUTMORWED G+. surface •lave[ on .. FOf�A6�R¢ING s, changfrom the existing ground anal u demamtute that no redueclnn In ataD111[ -I GITYIOF EDMONDS `2` yee Y01rZf].3bPAGE24J4 E1s y By PAGE zz pF �NI I a ' "i A I Gvo k?f•.11gillren Hawley g HcCorkle Hoveaber 22, 1989 page S We recommend that structural design of foundations consider the possibility that future ground movement any occur. This movement could consist of differential settlement and/or irregular downslope movement. The risk of damage from ground movement to A structure at this It, e could be mI.i.I..d by deigning the entire h... a And foundation .yet.. a. a rigid unit. This design concept would permle sAne rotation or ",.placement of'the entire structure without sustnlning major atructural damage. This technique would require substantial bracing and stiffening of the structure, and In our opinion may not be coat off-etive. To acc—d— .... possible ground movement• we recommend that continuous spread footings be sufficiently stiff to Accommodate complete Ions of support beneath a substantial length of the footing, and that the foundation design be able to accommodate complete loss of support at any one Isolated spread footing. The design should provide for re -leveling of the atmeture if necessary. We recommend that structures in the northern portion of the property (approximately existing It. 1 • 6) be supported on spread footing. founded on the native, medium dense silty and or stiff gray silt that underlies the property, or on structural fLli supported by that native naterlal. because of the thickness of fill in the southern portion of the property (approx• imat.ly existing Lots 7 • 11)), foundation support in that area may locally require grade bends supported by drilled pier footings extending through the fill material. . Construction excavation within the southrrn portion of the property may encounter significant groundwater seepage and any require special aubsuriee. draln.g. measure.. Th. eslating fill eahnnkvnt Along the vent s Ida of 75th flee• Vast has exprrl•ncrd recent settlement, possfbry related to the declining water table• and that settlement 1. likely to continue for at I ... t ssv...l .or• yesrs. i.reavatl ens near th, toe of thnt embankment would require special provision+ for oboring, and aubaurfate w*IIs adjaten[ to that embankment would ve to A4 VIOSVED rem 1.1 high I.t. r.I lo. d.. FOR RECORDING CITY OF EDMONDS vat. 243i PnE2465 BY rn PAGE..2-_ OF.%r i 9105UVU,326 t I (ko@-;DgilwiTs l -r f? - Marley 6 McCerkle .. Noweb.r 22, 2939 LIMITATIONS We have prepared this t for r use I, l.nnln for roper you p g possible IT1. short -platting and residential development of this efts. specific lot F, - b... d.riea of the proposed short plat and design details of the residence. _ • wars net available at the r.I— this re r pert was prep panda Thera a • peaaf ble variation* and subsurface conditions free those observed In the CmA.• `. .xplorations, and also with tine. O �. Us recoenend that additional site specific Investigations be perforeed O 1, I' ' to rovld.. basis far ee p specific foundation r oeaeMetlena for each of the in Z Lots. We reeoenend that we be retained to review the final site development O plant to confirm that our opinions hew* been properly Interpreted. C Within the 11n1tatie of .cope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed In accordance with generally accepted practice. In this are, - at the ties the report we. prepared. No other condition., express or O n t ` I leplied, should be understood. � = z' o e o e lIl m We appreciate the opportunityto be of me rvlce to you onthisproject. If that* are any questions concerning this report or if v n provide F. additional * rvicya, plc... call. �.. Tours very truly, ' Inc. Csv/o�Evn-g^-t A. /m�e'rs�, z..'. Don.ld V. Tubb:t \ Senior Ceologl et 6un V. R,I..kl O principal -1 j 'o; t. Attach" "" ! AUTHORIZED Three copies sub.itted FOR RECORDING Copyright a 1969 C*ofnginaers, Inc., All Rights R.sary d CITY OF EDMONDS ! Vol.2436p66E24US BY ZS . ... PAGE ZV OF, 3( - (l"� fl ;� 2 6 F I hlFAD0. 50 100 SCALE IN FEET N -L .Property Line VIC"I TP-2 TP-V Gco f." I Igi I Ice I 9105o2o326 FC CI BY PAG UM PLAN AND VpM voL. 2 4 0 _:r , V, z fJ: om --I -n cr "Y n: M, 00 o my o C > C: -14 0 -n -n 30 I x m m o 0 M C c) m m C) z AUTHORIZE D z R RECORE ING Y OF EDMC NDS.-" m 7 G; 0 MAP i F{ i EalaHnp A�Ohelf 40 Tp-4 �TP-3 SFAS%A � n �...�t +Tv,/moo EXPLANATION: . � ` �• °-�'-¢- PORING. LOCATION AND NUMBER -T•l# TEST PIT LOCATI011 AND NUMBER AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING CITY OF EDMONDS- REFERENCE: LOMEF MEADOMDALE OEACN PLAT A 10 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP BY GROUP FOUR, INC., DATED S 1q3'r6. j-M l r ; z s � t: o i• y 3:.. Cm,,, ,s m0 p 0 p y� 4 C. '. m m e� O C_ z � Ps -n m T, v� 0Fnn In co, I z� 1 I z M. a P. I�ttl��lary;iiRrt� � � j AFFeN DIb S11gsuRFAce mpLo ATIDN ritmRAN i Subsurface condition. at the eit...cr. explored by s.... of six test m pits and on• boring. The test pus rare excavated on August le, 19ee co I; depth. of 11 co 17 [gee using a tractor -sourced b.ekhoe. The boring vas F. drilled on August 2I. 19ee to a depth o[ 11 feet using a hollovstes auger drill rig. field by an C m' �a The e.plorattons vere continuously logged in the engirearing geoleglac or geoteehnic.l engineer [ran our [Irs. The •ells OC'. eneountered wn elud[(ed in aeeordanee with the syaces deer ibed in m Zi Figureg A-1. A key to the boring locysbola is presented !n Figure A•2. Th. logo of the test pits are shave to Figures A•I and A-4• and el.a boring log is presented In Figure A-5- Th. exploration logs are based on our Incerpreteciona of the field N. k5i obser+•.tiona and lnditate the various types of soils encountered. They al.. ehenbe. O -ry, T lndi.ate eh• depths at vhlch these soil. or chair eherac ceri.eles DUt': ti Ct although the change nlbht actually be gradual. m pp I-- O r C 0) M 0.. RIZED ORDING DMONDS LYE) e OF-31_-- J. - vot. 24,16PIGE2459 91<i502t)3'st,2�x1❑ __., .. I' i} S I ;y 3 a i i � 1 R Oil LABORATONY TESTS: SOIL GRAPH: AL Alhrbaro ilmlte am Soil Group Symbol Iy Cis Comp.cllon (Sea Note U e .. Z. �• CS Consolidall- DS Direct shear Distinct contact betw.on OS Or.ln-else analysts ell. Sol $Iral. HA HYdman roeler dysle pr.duel Cheap. between •�- K Permeability Soil $Isla - �_ M Momwe content a•- 5M MD Moisture and density Water L—I $P Swelling pressure T% Trle.lal compression Bottom Boring C ITI' m O�- UC Unconfined compression•-• CA Chemical AnelY.l. of '-1 0' () n' BLOW-COUNT/SAMPLE DATA: Blows :.puked le drlee 0.mes A 12 S Location of relally ly Moore ..mpler 12 inch.. or ocher ed di.tences using �� C _ \ 20 undisturbed sample Location of dlal.b d ..mple pIndictound hammer falling inch,.. P [ILocallon of sampling attempt 'P' Indicates sampler pushed wIlh w.Ighl of hammer or hyd—dlc. drip rig• Ip 0 with no r.e- y Location of aemola attempt of using Standard Penetration Tell proc,dur.a soW Locallon of relatively undisturbed ample using 140 pound hammer laliing 201nch. s. NOTES: 1. Soil el ... Nie.tion system 1, 1umm 1-cl In Figure A-1. 2. The leader must refer to the diaeu.11.n In the report last A w.a ea the e.Pior A lion log. IOr a prof of ..b....... condition.. AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING CITY OF EDMOND" By PAGE —2S r- 3f ���,,NN'° KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS iJCG��IpEngIIIem FIGURE A-2 Uz 0 3 z 6 etE I Il `� O 1 t 'I i J ' r j a q, goo of resr rrt k OFIM SpI.O/tq,Y Fy - SWAM QYYTInI SYYY'ICY QJSSICATI@I IlErl SYIMQ mm YYYG- m •.• 1.s a c Lard Y,n cM,tt. Ye•e xeulewo Lmrl Ywm[. �n, �.• cuvrYitn r Lumr nLr nn e.,.m, woo orLLr• .!o .00rs t,orr. r/r = f L• ,Yniii p r11 ' (y. ... ... K eM, ae.Y, nLr nn •mn IYYrt, n,Lrr m �:. 11 . L. au„n r.w Rtn I.Ye vin nurn rrae,wt oust. nn,t O-. nrl rli mnLtlm GT 11.1 I[[t 11,Lpt IIRK[ OnDr.'m At I•.• nR M m Z` L.• .., a YMt L.w L.Yer Lnl vim •m„ �wrt. Yuvr - - C Z .., • I.I M cM, eYY I•w nLtr save nn Ioo,1 en woe et•MI ,mo1[, ouYr - r -�. =. ` �'�� rvrnm eMr eYY ILw Leon Lnt vin rmn <wrt. Yerer � t I,, . ,.� a, eut LeYY, ctu Ymrr, ronn Q T :Di/ �; w1 Inn Len Ir®,w RiR, ronn I .... u.1 n e.a Len I,tmlua en11, rzrt m m. --'- 1,.• - r1.• w LxYr nLi Im1 Inrr. rout, 11.L - ro.L ro• cur n 1 I.11, r nn nr ctwLRn •r u.• no! n i Z rtli !n aMr,•Y ••GVY nln Len Yln GM,[L e•e 10•r• ILmI[, Bull r � Fn, _ • • ) • I,t 1.L - ..! LrI Lmetn nG,n eYY cur Inn IMe v1n roon IYmn, eeror �. 2.. L.• - !.• w Gur Lum nu <nln, n,nr r •.• n.L a row,.. w1 nLn wn orY w YnL[• ,or R, Z." � 1 [.1 N.I IM1 Ct11 IMor I1LI 1111111Y MV HIM MIIVI I I.• 1L.• M Lear Y,LTr Ie[I fr[mIP1 Yon, nt[i ro Yt11. co i rmT rlT m,Y•LRm et IL.• IQT �: i :� - m I[nK[ OIYttRY ' 0' Y] AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING m CITY OF EDMO14DS r 1 rn wtL, KrYa,cL nLiYili . e IrwL. n m..rYG+m ILw ro •., raor. Krv...n m ..Y lmY, utm a r enMR s Ravv.wrl K.on I -. n1 BY F1'$ P4rag W-r z rrrcc Gco pbi mccis f10U11[ A-9 „ - - �. rof.-4436PAGE2461 . fki rr LOG OF TEST PIT DEM OCLOW == T,.. DEscrwmom sysm 0 m .... .... m 00 o,:: A > Z 3:1 o -n IT 33 It It -1. Al I'.. I'll rn m a 0 0 M m Zrm -I D. ;o AUTHORIZED -4 FOR REC RDING CITY OF EDMOND!' z FBY 0 -T-5 m PAGE-311— 0-- OP TlBT PR G e o c rs E i 1 111 c, c - �� 0 03 26 1 462� PAGE ... ......... 0 sM'. r Tssr nnTn BORING B-1 a E, �( o� a4 p �J 1(rux(rnor+ i cre.r s„tw. tx..r:� f I� a7uMlh.�r. w:w1 MMI-Am �I= 15 Ml. f:r•, uidf uh (wlf, w:w) u 10 70 n in 75 25 U ■ AUTHORIZED 30FOR RECORDING w CITY OF EDMOND n ■ BY L'i5 IS 35 PAGE 'd OF,.,A IS ■ �frM. M.v7 will �_ _ . ry.rl vwrk�N M )10IM w N.VN Ns I^� �wv �rwMmd ryinx(v I.wthad w da}aA N7/ lml 00 p Ndr>r fin A.7 (v rgA�"MIs Y �M,h Log of Boring ZGeosf Engineers Figure A-5 vot. 21136rrot24dn O m om m o' Oc n=7 z p 1: c: T n mm , !i o m C9 co Ji 5 (1) r Ili . • z' N z O ra' d m LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH DELOW SRL OrK" onokm SUiKI! 11/S9n=CJ1Tg11 rg aLL rn Tr-/ 1.1 - ..1 w lRw. tYa e.wno Nr nur iue vin wvn, was cnnl •.D Roar/ Ilaai[ m Ymiul Dan. Dual e 0 11 e M wT L CNr •tLTT tum vtn wr[L um IDDn IDmIIF • Daft ,�tollTl ILI 4.• R aRAT nLT tYD nitt NT IMm. Durl nn in meLDrm a Il.. nn YO tWOL[ IMtarm ttar rTT n e.1 . t.e u Iwn [TLtt ium v�n wr[L. YDaD Dntlt IYD L ILaOt[ m I¢OIN1 Dan. 1 - 1.1 - 1.1 1T Rn01tR lRP/D HYD vin IroOit IIGDI VX D[Yt[, DRTI •.1 - 1.1 R wf IILT vin lOVYI T'.nT liln. DRNI I.e . l.R a IluiaTu wr Lae nn Ram[ man, DRTI •.e • u.1 ra wT n[T 1•nn m mT mn, Durl [l.1 P.1 R MIT 11U i14R0, swl rov m mrtnn .T n.1 rue p tares[ wlnrm tLLt rlT tt e.• - t.l N 1®ta•1 IRO.tr liltt tap Yln C4RL eRp RODtt IlD9IL, nTl e.1 - l.1 i11 tIDetul teYR eW NT nitt ¢MD YSM wrLL ere RODII IMmfa l.D t•.t A 11awlM wT Dittt tuYl v!n tlUrR It®IOv MYt[, tleerl 1•.e - Ir.l 11. wT .1. 1YD /ILTT Nl frnT /}In A ReM, IIDI/tl ntT rn m�tLTm er n.1 rtn A INK[ A AUTHORIZED FOR RECbRDING CITY OF EDMOND'? BY F-n PAGE- 07 31 lY[ D[1•IRt DI 11t 4[n rli LOLL, LL Afn� n 1.1 raaT l ta0tt 11l iatT rll eY1 trtMD It mYtlelLm eecw.Tt'n •.1 rOOT. ua --- � LOG OF YlBT FITGeo Enginecrs FIGURE A-4 -9105 020 3 2 6 rot PAGE 4 G 2 I %S O 1 �I m r Cm ma O `0C' xm m Z A-4 AZ rn 00 -n t 4+: mm N o 0 N. c ca m 0 999� TC� Z. N. z 0 0 m I i , rrsronrA BORING B-1 qr� urunlrnoe o sr a�nrh...rt�.e.rt -5 S � f:nJf uYiluM(L.we, nni.il it IM�n fw uM lh..e, «:ail 10 m 05 MI. f:rn uMl Yh (nill.+µl IS Z 14 M1. CnI Tfwill. r.i�/ � 20 � 27 17 e 25 25 v AUTHORIZED 20 FOR RECORDING '0 CITY OF EDMOND 2a e BY r-�5 �s 35 PAGE '-I 0F..%I a e • cnen b.l./ witfi--- .. . ry.M/m�NM 901n(r NVM b Ib /n+M awn 4r��w..lwe ilurin lr✓N bh4]I 9. � I.x.3ev �ry.n A�E lu �plurlimin�beY Geo llEngineers Log of Boring FigureA-5 voi. 2113 6 Pere 2 d 7. i z O 1 -- m vm 00 j m m r ,p0 c �m mz A --i Dz r ^ T `i 1 mm aaUS I r C �' ; - co m zr z co a m FF ■ ( �� lit�•..lt$I Ii ., l."26 Jko Pic r) � ,7e'Jrlo 1/6. D f -eH 4o -rIGHTLIN6 MATERIALACUMFrAO 1442 ADS —VF- KEV1CW�b15 PgAR)INCI r40 pvc rdj' r lrFM6 MUST AVPP96CW " Sj)Ft 35 (ASTM 3034) Cfry oFepfflotJ Vg*(6d 9"M"P"• sHow A'Rgk op Alw 1(4rff—Vtw', M.OlArtmJ NOTE rHAr 51M ffkS AfO Co9C6J7r-AlW Fw" pkpl SNoW Ngw arrpinnu yNew gYf6-r1lj& *Tmo Oz4tN5 NAL pgoplt,5- Ot AI&O 'IrOgM Ct4o*lr44 -,qftoW p9*1MMIC 544MVI EXPIRES AljRfltj:j C7. XW OH ,r, Cjtj9crW& 7b 55 rp-m —8 DRAINAGE PLAN' OTEO APFFfIOVED AIS 1, r, ED �PS,,�r DEC 12 1997 I RECORD OF INSPECTIONS i INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED . .. SETBACKS ..................... i FOUNDATION: ! Footing ...................... Wall .......................... Pier/Porch ................. i Retaining Wall ........... Slab Insulation .......... -� PLUMBING: Underground ............. , Rough -In ................... Commercial Final ...... HEATING: GasTest .................... Gas Piping ................ Equipment ................. Commercial Final ....... EXTERIOR SHEATHING NAILING .......................... FRAMING........................ FIRST FLOOR FRAMING... - INSULATION ................... Floor Insulation ......... Wall Insulation ........... ' Ceiling Insulation SHEETROCK NAILING ... SPECIAL INSPECTION ... MISCELLANEOUS .......... C FINAL APPROVAL FOR i!� /1 �' j.— lid-Z - OCCUPANCY .................. j fr�QD3�/ot r'�