20000377.pdfDATERECEIVED
M
PERMIT EXPIRES
... PERMIT
CITY OF EDMONDS
ZONE .MIER Z_Q=
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
F .11
JAOBRESS 11 SUITEIAPTN
F ;t 5'r S w
OWNER �NAMEINAME ZINE.S
,Q,-A11V19
PLAT NAMEISUBDIVISION NO. LUI No LI NO.
LID FEE $
DRE
M N � ES
l MAILING AD SS
, "6
6-0,16_-,,E
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER 111RCMIL STREET MAP
X 3() 31�
0
CITY TE EPHONE
ZIP
EXISTING PROPOSED 0
REQUIRED DEDICATION No" IT
LINE SIZE NO.OFKRES P
NAME
SYEOUIORED
YE N 0
AOAJ Ah Alty-'el OJ
ADDRESS
REMARKS
OWNERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
CITY ZIP ITI EPHOIE
S"WI-10ml's �Z_ 3eos�5'2-0,R20
NAME
3 /00
ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE
ADDRESS
DATE
FIRE REVIEWED BY
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
&A)
CLI OR ADES I N' BON.
STATE LICENSE NUMBER
VARIjAN�CEEOR
RED PO E
YE 27zT?e
Ll
V) 7A -0/
R "EIGHT
REVIEW AU-0 F...
IGN AREA IT0,
PROPERY N_' // C) 6
�X :�
COMPLETE EXEMP ALLOWED PROPOSED I
EXP A
RES30EN IA PLUMBING I NI -CH
LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (17.) PROPOSED SETBACKS I')
ALLOWED PROPOSE FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT �RS;PE REAR
NEW
COMPLIANCE OR
�5 �, --7<', -Ye.- Zl'
ADDITION C] COMMERCIAL E3 CHANGE OF USE
z
ING LOT AREA P I EVIMED BY DATE
P KING
REMODEL C] APARTMENT C] SIGN
PROVIDE
G I Z q 10 L
0 REPAIR 1:3 (END FTI
MAP-
C] DEMOLISH TANK
RETAI IN
IZ GA�RAGET N - WALL RENEWAL
CA .R SOCK
0 � SINE..
p JT;PE OF USE BU CTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
CHECKED BY TY 0 0 TRUCTION E 0
E S/,j 6e 7 �f / 4w
ROUP
NUMBER IZ NUMBEROF CRITICAL
DWELLING AREAS
OCCUPANT
SPECIAL INSPECTOR LOAD
OF R
STORIES U.— NUMBE
REQUIREOf2YES
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
INSPECTIONS PER USC; 11081FINAL INSPECTION REO'
COA) 5rA 0 G 7— S-IAICL F -,olz4AftL
ROGRESS
/_/cIzJSR_ -
III
VALUATION FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
HEAT SOURCE GLAZING I LOT SLOPE %
BUILDING
1- . 7-17. -
PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE
PLUMBING
(3,0/
MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOT D. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
PUBILIC
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY NSTRUCTION ON THE
ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
GRADINGIFILL
DOMAIN (CURBS. SIDEWALKS. DRIVEWAYS' . n.UEES,
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
STATE SURCHARGE
P"'MITAPPLICATION: ISO DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT'. I YEAR ' PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
ENE. REVIEW FE95
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
II&ASSIGNS AND UCCESORS
FLIUAN 1, THE CITY OF
�,,N,,
�N..�H
ENG, INSPECTION FEE
�,.U.S.
D
AGREE S To 'No"""' L HARMLESS
;A M EREST "EM Y, Dg EN
EMPLOYEES NG AGENTS FROM ANY AND
IN I TNO, OFFICIALS
INS FE
I
WA HN ON IT' ' .
C NO WHATEVER NATURE, AFU�A 'RECTLYOR INDIRECTLY
' GT S F.'TE
- UA.S FOR DAMAGE No B
RED T pl-NV
A 'L ISSUA IS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
THE SBU N THIS PER .IT N.E .1 T.
F R.- A CIE
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
I 11.1—CE
E.E. To MODIFY . WAIVEO.. EDU.EANYRSQUIREMENTOFANYC TYO
RCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION
RECEIPT
.F', VTN ANY WAY THE CTY.A.H_,TY TO ENFO
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
1 HEREBY ACKNOW THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION: THAT THE INFORMATION
LEGCE
APPLICATION APPROVAL
UT..R ZED A -ENT 01
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER OTHATHE OftLYA N�,.UC
LAW ULAT,�,, CO
C ED
CALL
-on -� 1-1 - P-Inn" Unt" '9n'o oV'n'
0111 hsj,,,� D,.p.ty: F ,, d. no
THE OWNER [AGREE TO COMPLYWITH ITYAN6S
T No PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
TION. AND IN DOING HE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY.
G To
:.d
d, 1, .k d P
i, ac no. 0 9 poo,ndod.
FOR INSPECTION
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATIN
DATE
WORKMENS Co. PENSATION INSURANCE AND PCW 18.27.
05FICII IIG R
SIG-TUIlE RACE DATE I N
(425)
771-0220
HE SFDSY DATE
EXT 333
ATTENTION
�d)
iris UNILAWFULTO USE OR Q A BUILDINGPOR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND AP ROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW - INSPECTOR/
ASSESSOR
OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
FAX
PINK OWNER- GOLD
CATE
z
0
C= m
rn 0
0
80
M
M
0
a
C-1)
0 -n
m Ill
a
0
a m
m
0
z 0
-4
X
z
z
0 1
0
m
FEB 2 3 2000
DEvELoPMENT E�l
C)
CITY* OF 18-,V..
SECTIN C-c
call
81.7
T,
7-7
A
R ED By PL NNI
---------- ----
W25
AREA CALCULATIONS SUMMARY
Code Desedisuon &W TOW.
alai �12314.00 1234.00
P/P ft..t P ... h 120 00 120 00
s
GIA 0—." 550.00 151.100
"0. 0
'.0. 0.
TAM . a 9900.00
13Y
I 'OTAL
SKETCHIAREA TABLE ADDENDUM
State WA Zip 08020
MAR 0 2 2Z1 J
0EvFL0,PMENT SERVICES GTR
C Ty OF EDMONDS
2�i
O�
0,
Average Foundation 40V R1
Datum: Sanitary Sewer Manhole
On 232m; ST SW approx
I 16' east of the site
See drainage plan
Actual Building Height = 424.81
APN = 362703-1100 a M
Area = 9,900 Sf 1 M.0;
-i C'y
Lot Coverage 1,748 sf (18%)
0
M�
im
Grading
Will excavate for crawlspace —Z
5o, x 3Z x 4'deep = 6.400 cu ft
storm retention W x 20' x W deep
352 cu It
.0 n
Total is 6,752 sf or 250 ou yds -0,
of this, 50 cu yds will be backfill
The remainder will be
A M
Spread over the site
0
n!
0
ko;
Z.
1-20
z! �� i�'
LIVING AR BREA OWN 01
Smakd� subtatals
ri..t 71.. i M
2.0 8.0
3.0 30.0 390.00
11.0 28.0 309-00
20.0 26.0 520.00
Pz'
1234 4 Areas Total (rounded) I
say
F�IECIEIVE D\
SITE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MAR 2 0 2000
ENT SERVIO's Cj
TNO17MY TFL
OF US
March 18, 2000
Dennis Wick
Wick & Associates
6016-F NE Bothell Way
Kenmore, WA 98029
Re: SFR 9428 — 232' St SW
Dear Dennis:
Please find enclosed my an ltration system. The system I designed for
this lot wAill accommodaFLa2-year sto or more, using the procedures in the DOE
Storm Water Manu . D ed area on the site, a larger infiltration system is
ater Manual. D ed a'
not feasible. However, this will not be a.problem, as the overflow will not create any
significant downstream adverse impacts. Finally, no easement or stom drainage channel
exists on the downstream properties to which we can connect, so infiltration is the best
solution.
Sincerely,
David C. Dougherty, P.E.
310 - 20Sth S.E. Bothell, Washington 95012 (206) 481-9687
0
Ln 0)
In
WE
f�Qlr- OCE-7 VAc."vev
= —3 —1 (.'
uv
As=-
ac
L.Aok�T-
L" -9 1 e-
-Z4
e,
L".�
A-2
�Q(
r. 4,V i;e.�/
I . 44-
T-r-a ,, 'L
Coe,
dO,vG cSs
t;
6,j
'-d
A�2,F" c
3%
`72
r e
-i M,
-ro M'�
M, 0� J.
Ol
8a
M i
M
MMA,
>1 I
Z.
0
I
13
co
CL
E
0 ID
M
co
z
kc-L I a -2 J
tj�A� 4(f-� go V -e �A
L� ", o.- t.9
0. 0 �- 04- e-
Lh cv s,�koL.—csL Co,
v4A
r�
Q V .. Ir, 1*0
g-� V�-
q -9 �o r t"\
J,
L; -e- A-, -�L— ca-orev-,e, e.
c \l. C- (CUU P�eyl- V-*A-,a %& or '%A4
09 7-
V-0,
wtL( ae
-r�ojs ;-r—ro--w j4- 67 1
w�L� V\.o� ee 0- , ""' v.
1. w r - ') " - , I L . 0 -�- e. . LIS -- 1, -Y ff �,c .1 J'
o V, 6 k, vi v , , A , - 4o r,,l PTOfel
m
-n
VC: m
m CO3,
0 -n
M,
ff I
0
m
1 L
Received Mar-12-00 03:29PM from CCITT G3 SDS page 3
SKETCHIAREA TABLE ADDENDUM
Cm ft WU
Idwnds, COWL.!� _Olft WA
6"dwXu.'d
0
Average Fotmodan 40F
Daturn: Sanitary Sew Manhole
On 232na ST SW apPrcx
M�
I is, fait Of the site
See drainage Phn
AcWM1 Sl H.19M - 424.8!
APIN 362703-1100
M"
Are 9,900 Or
0
r
Lot Coverage 1,744 Wf 0 0%)
M 01
Grfidlng
M.
M
Will excavate for araY460900
w 32'X4 -deep -6,400 cult
x
Z�
6 4
storm retention Wx 20'x 41' deep
352 cu A
Total is 6,762 if or 260 ou ydo
rE
of this, 50 ou Yoe Will be WWI
The rem Inderwiii be
0 M:
Spread .,the Otte
M Im
0
0
C
0.
71
a.[.: 1-20
F777Ww. AREA 13REAKDOM
—ass, . ...... 111". "whal tumult
z
Z:
1214 a 1114 4
.:I
2-9 X 1.0
V/V "..t 350.00
81a, ""t
"a d. I
Liao Liss 0'
0 go 11.0 21.0 304,00
10.0 29,0 520.00 M
TOTAL LrVABLE (hounded) 1234 4 Ames Total (rounded), 1234
I L ---- -------
2
.09 r
I,
IV4
r
LLI
co
"Iml U J ZUUU
May 2, 2000
I Y
PERMIT COUNTER
0;
Dennis Wick
Wick & Associates
6016-F NE Bothell Way RECEIVED
Kenmore, WA 98028
W 0 3 2000
\1'
Re: SFR 9428 - 232' St SW
ENT SERV CES GTP.
1-10,141 114
M0
- 0 F. E Q h kQ 0 3
Dcar Dennis:
oc�
M
In response to a memo from Don Feine, Drainage Engineer for the City of Edmonds, I am herein
ID
outlining the procedure we used for the percolation tests on the subject site. Per instructions from
Snohomish County, the EPA Manual for Onsite Wastcwatcr Treatment and Disposal Systems
'Me
was used. It is very similar to the King County method. holes were soaked for a four-hour
period, then, with about six inches of water in each hole, the rate of fall of the water level was
0
'n
recorded over a period of about 30 minutes. The rates were 2.4 min/inch, 16 rnin/inch, and 13.3
min/inch.
rn M
The capacity of die trench was summarized in a letter dated March 18, 2000 using the rational
infiltration trench
0
0
C
method to estimate the developed runoff rate. This analysis showed that the
was unable to handle much more than a two year storm. However, using the SBUH methodology
-M
in Waterworks, the 100 year storm is about 0.02 efs, which means that the system will handle a
dZ
100 year storm. 'Mis is true because the infiltration capacity ofthe trench is 0.03 cfs after
including a I 00—� safety factor. The difference in these analyses is due to die fact that the rational
method is esfimatni6 ,cak flowq for the purpose of conveyance, while the SBUH is measuring
longer duration storms for the purpose of detention. Since the infiltration trench has a detention
Z�
tg
capacity (see attached calculation page), the SBUH is more accurate in estimating the manner in
which the system will perform.
z
01
In conclusion, the proposed system should perform adequately.
0
M�
Sincerely,
havid C. Dougherty, P.E.
cnel.
310 - 208th S.E. Bothell, Washington 98012 (206) 481-9687
L "J I�s
VIA vs vV
Sova ('s v C7
jowo
� C"
0 C::
S/ 2/00
Site DeveiopmenL
Wick - 232nd St.
'vN
BASIN SUMMARY
o go.y ostdeveloped
BASIN ID: Cl
NAME:
SBUR METHO DOLOGY
0.04 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 CfB
TOTAL AREA .......
RAINFALL TYPE ....
TYPEIA PERVIOUS AREA
0.00 Acres
PRECIPITATION ....
TIME INTERVAL ....
1.40 inches AREA..:
CN.... 86.00
10.00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
TIME OF CONIC .....
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
6.30 min
0.20 AREA..: 0.04 Acres
CN.... 98.00
PEAK RATE: VOL: 0.00 Ac-ft TIME' 480 min
M;
M�.
M 0;
0 C
BASIN ID: c2
NAME.. ,LL,j�r ostdeveloped
r�
M.
SBUH METHODOLOGY
0.04 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
F,
TOTAL AREA .......
RAINFALL TYPE....
TYPEIA PERVIOUS AREA
AREA..: 0.00 Acres
C:
PRECIPITATION.-.-:
2 .10 inches
10.00 min CN.... 86.00
xt
TIME INTERVAL .... ;
TIME OF CONC .....
6.30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
AREA..: 0.04 Acres
o ni
COEFF:
0.20
CN.... 98.00
PEAK RATE: _g _N _cf�q VOL: 0.01 A C-ft TIME: 480 min
mm,
0 &
0
P
t g
0 Fn'
�6'
a OF
r. Coi
t
BASIN ID: c3
NAME: 25 Year Postideveloped
SBUH METHODOLOGY
0.04 Acres BASEFLOWS, 0.00 cfs
z
t li'v
TOTAL AREA ........
RAINFALL TYPE ....
TYPEIA PERVIOUS AREA
0.00 Acres
X,
I
PRECIPITATION ....
INTERVAL
2.50 inches AREA..:
10.00 min CN.... 86.00
TIME ....
OF CONC
6.30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
TIME .....
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20 AREA..; 0.04 Acres
98.00
rn'.
CN....
PEAK RATE: 0.02 CfS VOL: 0.01 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
L
BASIN ID: c4
NAME: 1�ear�ostdeveloped
SBun mETHOI)OLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
0.04 Acres BASEFLOWS:' 0.00 CfS
t
RAINFALL TypE ....
TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA
AREA..: 0.00 Acres
-zl.
PRECIPITAT ION ....
3.00 inches
10.00 min CN ..... 86.00
TIME INTERVAL ....
TIME OF CONC .....
6 .30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
ABSTRACTI ON COEFF:
0.20 AREA ... 0.04 Acres
98.00
CN ....
PEAK RATE: s VOL: 0.01 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
Project Review Checklist
Plan Cheek#: 3
Project Name:
Project Address:
Receipt Date:
Underground Wiring Required
Hydraulics Permit
Plat/Subdivision Requirements
Street Dedications
PUBLIC 'VoRks
Easements - Public/Private
DEPT
Engineering Storm Drain Review Feel
Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee
Drainage Plan (On -site)
Setback - Storm Drain Line
Open Ditch - Existing
Culvert Required
Culvert Size
Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff
Catch Basin Required
Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access
Sidewalk Required
Curb & Gutter Required
/A
Curb Cut for Driveway Required
Street Paving Required
Right -of -Way Construction Permit Required
Bond Required for Public Improvements
FEMA Map ChecklWater Table
Side Sewer -Availability
Calculate Sewer Fee if No LID#
Water Meter Size
Water Meter Charge Required
Hydrant Required
Street Cut
Miscellaneous
RW Permit #
SS Permit #
Fire Connection$
Meter Size Paid $
Date Issued
Date Issued -
Date Issued -
Date
Receipt
Receipt #
Receipt #
Receipt #
Z
0
C M
PH 10
80
C
M
M F
0 4
J)
0
M M
a
0
6 Fn
C co
M 0)
M 0
Z
7-1
Z
-4
X
Z
M
IKWAL PROJECT APP
RECEIVA e,
SEP i 120 TO. (-A�&
057=- 74:1 DATE: 0
TvMMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION
FROM: DEPARTMENT DATE
___ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE—IWW-
PLANNING DIVISION DATE
PROJEC
SITE ADDRESS a-5s o-z
PERMIT #__����.ADB#-------J)ATE INSPECTED q11 100
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECT D r0KA\,-
A field inspection was conducted to determine compliance with approved plans. Final approval, denotes that
there are no objections from the above signed Department to the granting of:
_)L—Final approval of the described work
____-Performance Bonds associated with the project may be released
___$,GRANT FINAL PROJECTAPPROVAL
—GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
I
FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES
2.
3.
_____RE_lNSpECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
ocaprvl.doe.l:tenip:bldg:forms6/98
z
9
0
M
C: M
M a
--1 0
0
M M
z
10-4
C Z
0
mT
0 Ca
0 r-
0 M
C co
K U)
rn 0
Z
-1�
X
z
z
9
0
M
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR
DATE APPROVED
SETBACK$ .....................
FOUNDATION:
Footing ......................
wall..........................
Pier/Porch .................
Retaining Wall ...........
Slab Insulation ..........
PLUMBING:
Underground .............
R.ugh-in ...................
Commercial Final
HEATING:
Gas Test ..............
-3- 6D
Gas Piping
Equipment
Commercial Final
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
NAILING ..........................
FRAMING........................
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING...
INSULATION ...................
Floor Insulation
Wall Insulation ...........
Calling Insulation
tz- cz:) C i5f Q
SHEETROCK NAILING
SPECIAL INSPECTION
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY ..................
-7—
WOO—
......... ...... .
Z
0
0
Cc M
M a � ; t�;�
01
80
C
M Mz
to -4
z
4
ca
0 'T'
n
M M
0
0
0
C
Em -0
z
z
0
ITI
L
[PERMlf'EXPRES
US' PERMIT
ZONE
CITY OF EDMONDS NUMBER ;7 7
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITEIAPTa
ADDRESS 1v (
,7 7
OWNER NAMENAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAMEISUBDIVISION NO LOT 00, LID NO.
I LID FEE S
MAILING ADDRESS
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OlFIDIAl STREET MAP F.aa
6_01'6_-,-- 1!�" r-11 I'V Y X 30 3c
EXISTING PROPOSED
CITY zip EPHONE X11� a. a o
d
REQUIRED DEDICATION FT
A-6-im o4s- .111=d 0.- -
ETER SIZ QUIRED
NAME No
A0,u A , lvaoeL
REMARKS
OWNERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUVRAINAGE V&S
4 A
CITY zip
ITZINE
<6, -0a
0
NAME 31004 /",p
6 REVIEWEDIDAT5
ENGINEEFII��
ADDRESS
Islis 9' DATE
FIRE REVIEWED By
P: CITY zip TELEPHONE
Z
0�b77_ 206 9' 7 G70?_ INSPECT I N
01
PBGND
TATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION !A VARIANCE 01 Cl SHORELINE OR ADBI ..�
T RE 0 E
0 YES o 2
-
0
'n SIGN AREA HEIGHT
ILL
m
DOM SEPA REVIEW
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PA ..mp ALLOWED PRo,o ALLOWED PROPOSED
I '2
;,k)o EXP Alk
vi -4
IT!
'A LOT COVERAGE REQUIRIO SETBACKS 1-1 PROPOSED SETBACKS I I
UR I FEAR
FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT E
NEW ESIDENTIAL PLUMBING I ME.- ALLOWED PROPOSE _/ ,
1.
c:
COMPLIANCE 08
'COMMERCIAL
m
0
0 cl CHANGE OF USE
El ADDITION A KING LOT AREA EVIEWIDIBY DATE
0
E] REMODEL 0 APARTMENT SIGN REJ PROVIDED q 10 ;� 4T,
7
c
'm An
0 REPAIR C3 FENCE FTI) MARKS
-
M Z
0, --1
I
THEIR
Z
DEMOLISH 0 TANK c3
A
r
is
E] RENE.1
G�.ARAQ�FT FR,�)IAINIOG WALL ENEWAL
0)
op "m T
(TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS 08 ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CHECKED BY ITY akl
ce 'T� "'o / 4.,- P OF GRou
0 -n
-n
UMBEROF RITICAL I
NUMBER D 0 SPECIAL INSPECTOR -yr occ,IANT
OF n��ILINU PEAS E.L, , o LOAD
lZ -, / I CUMBER RE ) ECYTEE1
t
rn rn
Un��ILIN�
�0 STORIES 6
0
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
0
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECI I ......
0
c:
M
Z 0
ZZ:
Ise
>
Z
VALUATION
FEE
(1)
PLAN CHECK FEE
Z
HE URCE GLAlIlllj BUILDING
IS's
0
PLAN CHECK NO: PLUMBING o m
u MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO - %
L BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADINGIFILL I b? 0
. DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVE 6, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
m PERMISSION.
L SEPARATEWAY STATE SURCHARGE
RE MTAPPLICAIION: IBODAYS
RPIRIOVIDED
P. PERMITLIMIT. I YEAR WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
END. INSPECTION FEE
PLICANT. ON BEHALFOF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS.ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
�A
NPINTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HO' D HARMI ESS THE CITY OF
FROM ANYAND
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITSOFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS INSEEC.T4e�E
ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
ALLCLAWS FOR DAMAGES OFWHATEVER NATURE.
x THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT 0o
FROM
. DEEMEDT MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
1. olN TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISIOW R
NOR LIMIT ANY WAYTHE CITY'S ABIUTY
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT: H E READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT =ORMAINON
APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT AAVT
A
M HE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTH GENT OF
AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC CALL
THEOWNER IAGREETOCOMIUY ITHCI Y dn,g 0 111 Insthl, Dlplly and Fall p.,d. nd
W .,,
E
RIZEDTHERE8YNO,FERS0NvnllBE EMPLOY D
T N, AND IN DOING THEWORK AUTH
K` o To FOR INSPECTION liv
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING
wonKMENSCOMPENSATION INSURANCE AND FICVY 18.27.
DATE SIGNED (425)
771-0220 DATE
RE SED5Y
ATTENTION EXT 333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OOdUIPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- DR16INAL-FILE YEL' (1111 NFPllTlR'
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK -OWNER - GOLD ASSESSOR