20000901.pdfDATE RECEIVED
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
K4�/NAVF BUSINE
o
LPERMIT EXPIRES
U SE PERMIT 266,361
ONE NUMBE I
SUITEIAPT#
JOB
ADDRESS
PLAT NAMEISUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO, LI NO,
LID FEE S
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
EXISTING — PROPOSED —
CITY III,
OSEPHONE
FREQUIRED
jtIA qg 1125-7 '0/
DEDICATION— FT
"R
,bpAnf,fis
NAME
�A
METER SIZE I LINE SIZE NO, 01 FIXTIRES
is
I YEP"." NO
ADDRESS
REMARKS Ig
OWNERICONTRACTOR REII NEIBIE I.F1 EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE I
6—
603 F u 11 v
is
:�a
,
C f&W eA —ql
11-11AIg
NA
ADORES
/gs
FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE
CITY TELEPHONE
kalk. ix; bAf%?qk7
OR ADBI INSPE.CTION
I <
VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE
RE .
SX�1;�E NUMBER
"'E. . 11 NO
RF
S"A REVIEW S GN AREA HEIGHT
C ... LET, EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED, ALLOWED PROPOSED
PROPEL:,�OUNT�R U-
I ,
EXP
MECH
LOT COVERAGE REQUIRE SErlACKSR`T.) PROPOSED SETBACKS IFTJ
FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UPSIDE REAR
0 NEW .. IDE.TIAL 0 PLUMBING
ALLOWED PROPOSED
COMPLIANCEOR
[3 ADDITION 0 CHANGE OF USE
PARKING LOT AREA EDDY DATE
0 REMODEL APARTMENT 0 SIGN
REDD PROVIDED
REPAIR 0 GRADING CYCE F NCI
X FT)
A KS
DEMOLISH 0 TANK OTHER
WALL 0 RENEWAL
Y PE OF USE. B 0 ACTIVITY) EXPLAft
PE OF USE.
CHECKED BY TYPE ON!
NS I 11i CI I D-�couuppy
LAQ
UMBER NUMBER 0 CF'T`CALq
DIVELLING AREAS
SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT
LOAD
OF REQUIRED 0 YES
STORIES ITS NUMBER
D9SCRIB RK TO BE DONE
4—
1111A
"R
PROG EBB INSPECTIONS PER UBC i..IINAL INSPECTION REO'D
VALUATION
FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
HEAT SOURCE -LAI-N LOT SLOPE %
BUILDING
PLAN CHECK NO: C VESTED DATE
PLUMBING
t5c,
MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
GRAqINGsFILL
DOMAIN (CURDS,
SEPARATE PERMISSION,
CHARGE OKI
PERMIT APIUCAIION: UK) DAYS
s, PERMIT LIMIr. I YEAR � PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
ENG. REVIEW FEES
SEC BACK OF PINK PERM MOREINFORMATION
-APPLICANT. ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS. ASStGNSAND SUCCESORS
5
T 0 MN,�y ,,,,D 4YNDHOL,.,=Ll ES T. CITY F
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
LANDSC PING
IN INTE ... TAGR"S :ND
E A Ts FROM ANY AND
ALD S,
2 ED..N EWAB�I..T.N TS.IFIC 'EMPL.
INSPE CTAION FEE
D " R"
- ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGESOF WHATEVER �!ATU' ITN�"S'Follilly.11 "Z�
I 16E, OF MIT EHA L NOT BE
RECEIPT
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
M THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT UAN
PRO IE S
DEEMED To MODIFY.WAtVEOA REDUCEANY REOUIREMENTOF ANYCITY ORDINANCE
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAYTHE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE A YORDINANCEPROWStON.
RECE
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I N AV E THAT TH E I NFO RM AT [ON
AD T R IS A ppTI
APPLICATION AP R AL
RE UOLNY,
E OWNER AUT
GIVEN I CORRECT. AND THAT I AM TI .0, C HORtZED AGENT OF
S E LAWS REGuLATIN
WITH CITY AND STAT G CONSTRUC;
.7
This 'PPI "I", " "I' Paris' d �y
L Ott s,,d
CAL BuIdi osp.1y: sdF_.'.'sid
THE OWNER, I AGREE To COMPLY E
H EMP Oy
TION 1 00 NG TH K AUTHORIZED T EFEBY No PERSON WILLBEE LC To
A LATIN
,
ksmtdged Yi spac, Tim'dod.
FOR INSPECTION
T T 0 W 5141 'TON
LABOR C S A E F A NO
IN OLAT OF TH TH E
DATE
EN E7A&�F
W KME COMPEN ATION IN 5 AND ROW 18,27.
S, E
0 tALS SIGNATURE
(425)
;ED
OWNER
[)ATE
74
771-0220 RELEASED By D
EX-11333
MtENtION
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE 08 OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221
FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW INSPECTOR
ASSESSOR
A
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
FAX PINK - OWNER GOLD .
5i98
z
-24 1 _1 �
0
M
m 0
C-)
c
m m
z
0 -n
n
m M
0
M
z
z
0
m
Degion build 5ervice'o Ific.
Eneimeorine & Ccrletruct�am Managerment ?home /Fax: (360) 793-9659
W119 - jwth 5t. S.E� Mohroe, WA 98272 Fager. (425) 220-0768
E-Mail: rhalcled$11,6110M V E D
DEC 0 7 2000
PERMIT COUNTER
Vv" fa,
4-A fy 0'�'j 6r �J—J�6'
LAIA-
wAk
-t
Wei "L
—t1iL
j 6&—V-
0 a
WAS
diZ5
—]RES
Rick Heide, P.F-
President
Agency Use Only Sound Air Pollution Control Agency AGENCY USE ONLY
Union Street, Suite 500, Seatlbe,WAMOI 2038 - 1) Residential
CASE#: (206) 689-4058 . Fax: (206) 343-7622
�2.
instructions forcompreting this form are on the be& 3.—
Please We or print clearly.
Application for Resident -Owner Asbestos Project
Enclose $25 Processing Fee
v/ Clearly Print your name and address below. This will be your return —
in
mailing 11el. /? Name of Person Conducting Removal;
Name
C* .-7 Daytime Ph ... 2-7/ 6(2
Address Evening Phone
city, state, Zip Code
OZ�11
RECEIVED
Quantity to be removediencapsulated: 1'70.. Square ft- linear ft. (for pipe work only) DEC 0 7 2000
Project starting date: / /- � - 0e) __ Completion date: IL- PERMIT COUNTER
Is this building scheduled for dOM011110n? Ea yes Q No
Site address: THIS MU91,812 COMEL0912) (Attach a brief expi anation ff site address Is different from mailing address.)
bcf -z7? wA Q U 3�
&10-code County
street
Hag material to be removed been sampled and analyzed? y-s 0 No
if No, Please explain
Facility type (check Ali that apply): /!" Single Family C! Two or more units
Q Non -Owner Occupied 0 Owner Occupied
Type of material to be removedlencapsulated 0 Popcorn Ceiling 0 Sheet Vinyl Flooring Vinyl Asbestos Tiles
0 Boiler Insulation Q Mag, Pipe Insulation
U Cement Asbestos Board 0 Duct/FurnSCOW(al)
Q other Wipe Insulation 0 Stucco U Plaster C1 Other (specify)
is removal: Xindoors C! Outdoors
Control measures & personal Protection Equipment'. n Disposable Gloves (3 Wetting
X112 Few Respirator isposable Coveralls Eye Protectio A"
�`(D Qebfla Wrap & Cut (Pipe Removal) CI Other (specify)
E3 Rubber Boots U plastic to Contain
Briefly describe your method of removal: e,-,: 4-A L 7L A
Asbestos disposal Sits: I A 6, N /If"' t,16114 62
AM WNER ?F Tffls RESIDENCE AND THAT THE ABOVE
C,ER,TI
_CT.
_Ok�=C
Date
PSAPCA F— fv-� 66-1764 (Re, 294) in
1:Whit"gency. 2:YellW.P1oNnY owner Pennit and Disposal AUthoriZeUM (On APPrOV81), 3:Pink-ProP6rtr Owner
Z
0
0
m
in 0'�
0
0
x rn,
0 -n
In In
a
0
J�
rn C,:
i
co
Z
0
In
L
RECEIVED
DEC 0 7 2000
R,
PERMIT COUNTE R
Asbestos Survey
16920 Talbot Rd
Edmonds WA 98026
0111�1:��
to locate and Identify
t
suspected building materials
Inspected on October 6, 2000
�0-n
prepared for
Bevan Construction
a
19312 Skinner Rd
GraniteFalls WA 98252
J
(425) 743-1479
Z
zi
by AHERA accredited building inspector
Larry Whitley
Of
Affordable Abatement, Inc.
3732 SmilhAve 4B
Everett WA 98201
(425)303 -8072
Survey
to locate and identify
Asbestos Containing Building Materials (ACBM's)
Subject property §FR � 0 Property Owner: Unknown
]not Ka
Edmonds VVA VbUZO
Date of Inspection October 6, 2000 Submittedto: Bevan Construction
Lab analysis by: EKO, Inc. Z1�931 ?_ S%nne�Rd
r.;i,. 'F
s A 98252
2000 70 PINE (425) 743-1479
Marysville vvA '9521 1
(360) 651-9390
K)W K)W WW WW B*W WW WW �)Ca WW WC,3 WCg WCS WW WCS (19 U KX's BOW
K)(Z WW v,)w w )(A )W WW W 3
Purpose
The above address Was inspected to locate asbestos in accordance with federal and state laws. The sampling methods
specified in 40 CFR 763.86, a sub -section of the Asbestos Hazards Emergency Response Act (AHERA), were employed
with the following specific purpose in mind : s report was prepared to
Safety - Intended operations present the potential for disturbance of an ACBM. Thi
facilitate:
[I Removal. Specifically this survey anticipates
0 Renovation. This may not include use of destructive search methods (i.e., - breaking into walls, etc.)
unless expressly directed by client in writing.
Demolition. Destructive search techniques are highly recommended and nay be implied by statutes
which require identification of all suspected ACBM's prior to demolition. [as in 40 CFR 763.85 (a)(4)(f)j
Management. Information herein will be used by the property owner to develop an appropriate Operations &
Management (O&M) policy to reduce the likelihood of exposure to building occupants for ACBM's which will
be left in place.
Public buildings, including commercial and industrial facilities are required to use an accredited
a
0 Property Sale
inspector i[see the Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorizeation Act (ASHARA)]. Private buildings in y
be inspected to compliment an appraisal.
Method
Currently only persons having the AHERA Building Inspector training are considered acceptably accredited by all
governmental agencies.
Mandated AHERA procedures are:
• training (for the inspector)
• examining (materials which the inspector suspects)
• identify (by sampling or by assuming material is an ACBM)
• assessing (friability, condition and potential for damage)
• documenting (the above with locations)
Procedures for sample collection often seem complicated to the lay person. What appears to be the same material located
area, Sprayed and troweled
in different areas may, or may not, require additional samples, depending on the usage of each
on materials re4uire at least three tests to confirm they are not ACBM. Differing quantities of suspect homogeneous
matedals also affect the number of samples rieeded�
Analysis of samples must be done by an accredited laboratory.
Assessing friability is done per the EPA definition that the material can be crumbled to a powder using hand pressure. The
forces expected to act on any material cannot be anticipated by this inspector.
An accredited Asbestos Management Planner should be consulted for assessments of condition or potential for
disturbance. ad
Estimated quantities are givzn,,as a courtesy and should not be relied on for bid purposes. An accred ___Asbest_oS_P_rc)je_ct
Designer is re iiied for guan it w ACBM's.
The inspector who prepared this report:
has received training pursuant to40 CFR Part 763, Sub -part E, Appendix C
has had at least ten (10) years professional experience in the asbestos abatement field
use,#is/her best its in locating suspect ACBM's
iZZY'07ek; M09907012 February 6, 2001 .
L�7 Larry vvnitley _--de—rfification # axpiration [)are
I
Structures
A survey of 1 building(s) occurred on the date listed in the hea d of this report.
Historical
Historical records [I were were not (check one) examined for use in this survey. The building(s) were estimated to
have been built ap proximately circa 1950's
i
Litnitati
Destructive methods El were I [I were not (check one) employed in collecting samples for laboratory analysis.
Sampling location drawings are not to scale.
Samples are believed to be representative of similar materials found throughout the areas inspected.
be assumed to contain asbestos until determined otherwise by an
Materials not addressed in this report should
professional. The results of such analysis must be incorp orated by addenda into this report prior to disturbance of
0
accredited
these materials.
Functional S
Functional spaces are identified in order to determine a sampling plan which will be representative of the materials fo und
q :!i�
in areas of similar usage, The following fu rictional spaces were identified at this location
1 0 M,
LA Livigg AEaa
C
M a
I ol
ILIA Utility Area
Honnoneneous Areas
Suspect materials are listed as shown below in order to detemn me the homogeneity of products discovered. These are
M r
z
1
materials which are similar in age, color and texture. This property contained the following homogeneous areas:
Oq
m rn
0
0 R
M 0;
z
re
Materials commonly suspected to be ACBM's which were discovered during this inspection are:
V Floor coverings
M insulation, structural
w
Z
Insulation, Thermal System
Mastic (adhesive)
0
Putty (or caulking)
M
14
Roofing
v
Siding brans
Vapor barrier main
Wall & ceiling finishes
Wiring insulation
General Notes
Asbestos containing materials were found.
This was an inspection of a single story home without basement which has a detached garage
Roofing on the house is 3-tab shingles over a tar paper vapor barrier. The garage roofing is the same.
smooth sheetrock except in the living room where light texture was found. Walls
Ceilings and waft in the res ence we
were the same.
Exterior siding materials were not suspected to contain asbestos.
19
Flooring of a variety of types was found, Only the floor tiles in the recreation room and nearby bath room was confirmed to
contain asbestos.
Domestic water pipes were not found to be insulated with ACBWs.
Heating was supplied by both a forced air system and electric baseboard heaters.
House structural insulation in the attic, walls and floors was not an ACBM.
No windows on the house and garage did utilize glazing putty. This was found to contain asbestos.
Wiring was not found to be insulated with suspected ACBM.
Identification
be representative of suspect
materials. It is also a
The following chart Was used to develop a sampling st . rategy which would
useful summary of materials tested.
ID Type FS HA Fri Desci Jan Location CBM
OtY
01-01 Misc L 1 N Cork Dining room N
N/A
01-02 Misc L 11 Slip felt Under floor coverings N
NIA
04-02
02-01 Misc L 2 N Floor tile Kitchen, bath #1 both layers N
NIA
05-01
06-01
03-01 isc L 2 N Floor tile, tan 911 Rep. room & bath #2 y
Unk
Misc L 5 N floor tile in Rec. room & bath #2 N
NtA
03-02
Misc L 8 N Sheet vinyl Kitchen, 2od layer N
N/A
04-01
07-01 Misc 0 7 N Roof shingle Roof N
N/A
07-02
07-03 Misc 0 6 N Roofing fell Under roof shingles N
Miso L 4 y joint compound On Interior wall & coiling sheetrock N
NIA
Mol
08-02 Misc L 10 Y Sheetrock Inside house N
NIA
08-03
08-05
08-04 Surf L 9 N Texture Living room ceiling N
NIA
09-01
Misc U 3
N Glazing putty
Garage
09-02
Miso
L
3
N
GI azing putty
Kitchen
N
NIA
10-01
Miso
0
11
N
Tarpaper
Under exterior wood siding
N
N/A
3
M
M
-n
ii
M
M
11 0i
M
Z
0 0
M ml�
�O
0 R'
CV)
MO
Z;
-04
0
M'.
7
G07-01 07 -02
Glifl.f',
M�
U
10
Y
SheelrOCK
Garage
'it
G07-03:
G08-02
Legend
Abbmv
gerin
Abbre Definition
Thermal Syste m Insulation (pipe or heat system insulation)
FS
Functional S ace
TSI
Surf Surfacing (troweled or sprayed on)
HA
Fri
Homogenous area
Friable
Misc Miscellaneous
ACBM Asbestos Containing Building Material
Assumed ACBM
TRA is, 1% by weight
"Tracei
Unk.
Unknown
-4.
Asbestos
Survey & Laboratoty Services
2000 70" PINE
Marysville WA 98271
(360) 651-9390
Environmental Knowledge Organization, Inc,
WCA! Wes WW Bow tocz WC.14 WC59 WC19 tow WC16 WCS WC`a BOW ID13W BOOS WW BOW weg WC9 159W W09 toeq WC9
Qualifications
Surveys by accredited AHERA Building Inspectors.
y the McCrone Institute and
Bulk sample analysis using EPA's method 600. Microscopists receive training h
participates in the AIHA's BAPAT program.
Air sample analysis by the NIOSH 7400 method.
assurance proceedures as outlined in the WISHA reference method, including:
Quality
. Participation in national test group - PAT sponsored by the AIHA.
2 other laboratories.
. Interlaboratory exchanges of air samples with at least
Fit testing using PortaCount and irritant smoke metho&
Rotometer calibrations using the Bubble Burret primary standard.
Work plans prepared by accredited AHERA Project Designers.
Project management by Washington state Certified Asbestos Supervisors.
'M
Drainage and Grading Flat'
"A
for the
13eard Now Keeldence
& Drive/Parklmo
city of Umonds
M,
County of Onohomish
0
i W
W I
Mark & Lattle. Deard
16920 Tall;ot Rd.
a,""
-A
980 26
V
Edmonda, WA
(425)771 -05014
W
5
CITY Copy
W
4
i W
Z;
-793
Revised March 20, 2000
1
N
fEXPI�FIESkt) CO
7
C)e,91,311 ftilci 5orvicem Inc.
-�rur
Emolmecrinio & Cono tloii Manaoment
Phone Fax: (360) 793-9659
Pao= (425) 290-0765
25119 - 20th 5t 5.E., Monroe, WA 98272
E-Mail: rhalde0premlerl.ma
bear6i KeoWeticc
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Purpose and Scope
"I
2. Existing site Conditions
C
3. Developed Site Conditions
4. Design Philosophy
1 :;0
5. Erosion Sedimentation Control
M 5�
C3 (0,
6, Upstream and Downstream Analysis
C *)I
7. Erosion Risk Assessment
8. Grading Quantities
Z"
01
Appendix:
Legal Description
Siteffiasin Map, and SCS Map
Site Existing and Developed Hydrographs
Conveyance capacity Calculations
Grading Quantities Report
Soil Logs
iL
1. Purpose and Scope
e existing drainage that
The purpose of this report is to address the changes to th
will be caused by the construction of a new home and associated driveway.
This development will change the runoff characteristics of the site. The addition of
impervious surfaces could increase the rate and volume of stormwater runoff.
Without the provision for mitigating measures downstream drainage's could be
adversely impacted. In addition, during construction, on -site erosion could result
in sediment being transported downstream with associated negative impacts.
Temporary and permanent water quality measures are proposed to mitigate
potential impacts.
2. Existing Site Conditions
The SCS soil types from Snohomish County Map Sheet #50 is Everett and
nd Aiderwood is a
Alderwood (map symbols 4/6). Everett is a Group A soil a
group C soil. Soil logs confirm the front part of the lot at the bluff is a deep sandy
soil and further back from the bluff is a very hard layer at 3.5 feet down. At the
bluff caving of the test hole was noted due to the sandy nature of the soil.
Appropriate trench sideslopes should be proposed to minimize hazards
associated with sandy soils. The test hole adjacent to the existing house showed
uld be expected at
some seepage at the top of the hard dense sand layer. This co
Refer to the AES report previously
the interface with the overlying loose sand
submitted for a full discussion of these conditions.
The site is 0.5 acres on the gently sloping portion back from the steep slope and
e house has been
has an existing house, garage with associated a/c drive. Th
e area of development is all developed with house paving
there at least 10 yrs. Th
or landscaping. Flows from the site would sheefflow to the west, down the steep
infiltrate in the fine
bank to the railroad r/w and then to the beach. Most flows now
sand and no erosion channels are evident.
3. Design Philosophy
The design is in accordance with requirements of the City Drainage Handout and
Edmonds Counter for projects with over 5000 s.f. of
articulated at the City of
n used as specified
impervious. 2, 10, and 100 yr precipitation amounts have bee
the existing developed state of the lot it was agreed
in the City Code. Given
condition as meadow/pasture instead of forested was
modeling the existing
M
C
M
0,
0 0
C,
K
M
10 3�'
C Z
0
M
0
cmi
mo�
Z
R,
Z
0
0
M
reasonable. I was to attempt to meet the "existing" condition with the 10 and 100
yr flows. The minimum size orifice allowed is 5/8".
Existing and developed areas were modeled using a SCS based hydrograph
program called Hydragraphs for Windows, version 6.0, by Hydraflow. The Cn
alues for Group A and Group C soils were averaged to get a site spe fic value
v
to reflect the site soils shown on the SCS map and confirmed by the soil logs
The peak flows were mitigated by designing a detention tank that would store the
difference between the design "existing" pasture condition, and the developed
I i
condition within the limitations of the primary 5/8" orifice. The 100 yr re ease s
met due to the use of a secondary as well as primary orifice.
nk with 36" access and sump risers
The tank designed is a 5' diameter, 45' long ta
welded to it. This will allow the entire structure to be welded and asphalt treated
with only one coupling band. it is important to minimize seepage adjacent to the
nk. Footing drains will be combined
steep bluff so a liner is specified under the ta
with the tank discharge in a 6" HDPE pipeline going down the face of the steep
bluff. The pipe will be installed in accordance with an a reement with Burlington
Northern RR for discharge to their easement. Blocking normally used for pressure
piping is now specified.
The cables required by the BNRR agreement provide 100% redundancy since
the pipe is designed to handle all the stress of the weight of water and pipe in a
-J I completely plugged, or fully flowing pipe with the associated impact at the bottom
T.
Water quality for the paving will be accomplished by use of a floatable separator
paving, then combination with roof water and further separation in the tank
at the
I due to the orifice discharge.
Following is a summary of the hydrograph results.
Lot Existing" Developed Mitigated by
Drainage Pastu Tank
0.02 cfs 0.12 cfs 0.02 cfs
0.23 efs 008 cfs
yr. 0.08 cfs
51 00iNiM17 I
6i 4. Developed Site Conditions
A The developed site conditions will consist of a new residence, and modified
access drive. All impervious surfaces will be captured and piped to the detention
tank.
0
I M
i k�
M,
C
I
C',
M
01
-4 K
0
5
M
M
3i�
C: Z
>
O'n
n
MM
c:
Z�
M
I L
5. Erosion Sedimentation Control
Straw bales will be provided at the discharge of the spreader T to the existing
ditch. Silt fence will be provided at the west edge of the areas of disturbance
before the steep slope to the beach. Seeding, straw and jute netting have been
specified at the slope disturbance where the pipe daylights.
Permanent erosion control will be provided by pavement of the access drive, a
floatable separator at the drive, and flow through the detention tank direct to the
toe of the slope. Quarry spalls have been specified at the discharge.
6. Upstream and Downstream Analysis
The site has about 165' of area upslope between the lot boundary and Talbot
Drive. No evidence of concentrated flows were evident crossing the lot line. Any
sheefflow will be picked up as part of the drive flow to the catch basin and be
piped through the detention tank direct to the toe of the slope.
The downstream system starts at the west edge of the property with sheefflow to
the west to the Railroad easement. There is a culvert under the railroad tracks
near the dispersed site discharge that takes the flow under the tracks and then
out into the Puget Sound Tidelands.
Given the size of the culvert and no proposed increase, there should not be any
adverse downstream impacts from this project.
7. Erosion Risk Assessment
Slope, Soil Type and Relative,Risk of Erosion during Construction
Slopes in the area of development are 0-8%. The soil type in the areas of
development are Group A and C. Erosion hazard for these soils given these
slopes are considered slight. The erosion hazard of the Everett bluff is considered
moderate. Given the collection and mitigation of all impervious flows, piping to the
foot of the slope, and dispersal there, the risk of erosion from this site is slight.
During construction the risk of erosion due to concentrated flows is moderate due
to the steep slopes along the bluff. However, the specified containment of all
flows to the tank and tank construction at the beginning of the project along with
the silt fence at the area of disturbance will act to disperse flows, and the
detention system will trap silt, but these measures must be installed and
maintained.
Location of Critical Areas and Related NGPA A
Puget Sound is to the west. The site borders a steep slope in excess of 33% at
the bluff. The discharge pipe will run on the surface of the bluff after daylighting
from the tank.
'p,
0,
M:
—i "n.
ca
M
m
0
-46
0 C="
M.
rn
10
Z
F",
3:
0 .............
'01
M M
0
011
0,
Z!
Z
Risk to Fishbearing Streams or Bodies of Water from Proposed Construction
The runoff from the site going to the Sound to the west is limited to treated flow
which will be similar to the existing. With the adequate erosion control measures
proposed for this project there should be no adverse impact to this waterbody.
Potential for Slides or Ground Movements
There are no features evident on this site indicating a great potential for slides or
natural ground movements. Leaks in the drainage system that could saturate the
bluff could change this evaluation.
Sources of Erosive water other than Rainfall
No other concentrated sources of water from upstream exist. No evidence of any
channels or ditches providing water to the development were evident.
Conclusion
The risk for erosion for this site will be greatest during construction and build -out.
BMP's will be specified to keep erosion potential at a minimum. Given the Type A
and C soils with the proposed landscaping and asphalt, and the flow direct to the
toe of the slope, this should be achieved at a high level for minimal risk. With
proper installation and maintenance of BMP's it should be possible to keep
material transported off site at their pre-existinq levels.
Upon completion of the project, areas of greatest risk will be disturbed areas and
concentrated discharge points for collected rainwater. As such these should be
kept at a minimum. To mitigate these occurrences all areas should be
mulched/planted such that this risk is minimized prior to the rainy season with
constant re-evaluation of risk. All dispersion trenches or other areas of potential
point discharge are to be armored/mulched such that erosion at these points are
minimized.
8. Grading
The grading quantity was calculated as 2449 c.y. cut using an ACAD14/Eagle
Point 99, tin -to -tin computer model for grades shown on the architectural plans,
and will be the amount necessary to meet height limitations.
Z'
am
C& i
m
0
C�
m
Z'
'mm:
a
0
6 R
cm�
Z:
Z
omms
mom wwwwww'w
wo
1
TICE�z, -IF THE-DOCUN IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR
'No . I 1 111 �. TH DOCUME 17 Ylo
ATISDUE E OLIAL"'60, THE:
'TO
7L--
cis
7g
0
W
U5
2L
1777
NOT sy 1 4 TRAP
-77,
MI,
zz - lo'ladl
k
N",
lo
hy
V, f1l, M1 A
AO W., 1A,
/onov
"'O&WONP Z11w Al OY o4z ��z
121
hy ZXQ,
Alozr"�r 'OeIr 7-27-.d
UWN By -411VAD VATE
ra
wl�
-------- ---- -----
'Ile 41
f�g
, ti
Q'O;
NO
4 1
ly /A
I "' 71
mn\
, It
Ap,
op