Loading...
20020032.pdf1�1 DATE RECEIVED PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS us zl PERMIT NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION joB ADDRESS OWNER NAMEINAME 01 7SINESS PLAT NAME'SUBDIVISiON NO, LdT NO. LID NO, W MAILING ADDRESS LID FEE S 2 /' PUBLIC FIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP CITY zip TE HONE LEE 77,1, ib—I ul. EXISTING — PROPOSED- FE..rEDC-IC-QN- FT NAME METER SIZE I LINE I� FRV REQUIRED YE�g NO 0 V ADDRESS REMARKS E OWNERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROIJDRAINAGE CITY 621—V404rr3 '��5 7 71 -,505�� -nl,'i`rUAjl 62 .l-7bV7?-;,l1 A ajl� "' qllj NAME � 0 M ENGINIEERI X ADDRESS REVIEWEDIDATE 'ab CITY zip TELEPHONE FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE WP,? //, 7 Z -- 7TA E LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY VARIANCE OR CLI SHORELINE OR AOB4 INSPECTION * JPBOND GrREo-o os A4- ZK-1-97 ES ONO 0 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO, SERA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED P;OSID A��'D PZ�OSID 1 ev Exp I I HE RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING I NEC. LO COVERAGE REQUIRED SET ACKS(FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SID8E REAR X REAR FRONT UPSIDE 0 0 cm 2"A.DITION Q2"COMMERCAL o COMPLIANCE OR CHAN E OF USE tvA ArA 1> , 1 -) ma PARKING IT ARE PLANNING REVIEWED By DATE LICTAll IT AREA] 0 []��R MODEL C] APARTMENT El IGN FIT RE �I.E. I 80 F NOI I i 1 11, 1 -7' Z26 113 C3 REPAIR el, EYES ( X FT) �TRW' m mZ C3 DEMOLISH 0 C3 OTHER 0 c > C) GARAGE Ej gTA,,HNGWALL CARPORT 0 RENEWAL. 'QC BEY fTYPE OF USE, BUSINESS 08 ACTIVITY� EXPLAIN: ECKEDBY JTYPWSTRUCTIO lCq:� O"`UPAH�l OR OUR om IIECIAL.INIEECTOR JAREA OCCUPANT ER RE.0 D C] YES LOAD m m DEIE71T',Rg�l (.p4e�A' REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108IFINAL INSPECTION REO'D 0 C co ?!�Itl 722 1177 !!�A m ca M 0 YAb -rlxl�e kmiximL lt-bfir- 45x ja�m[shl 1-n- 4z:Lnuz- z::: to Ir— VALUATION FEE Z PLAN CHECK FEE LOT SLOPE 1� OA G�E % Z 'e I I BUILD,.. 160,302 loq3 'PLAN CHECK NO: IVEIT11 DATE PLUMBING 0 3t;�7 m THIS PERMIT AUTHO IZES ONLY T HE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TG MECHANiCAL t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES. ETC,) WILL REQUIRE (f 116 ll�j-ucrl 4-�) SEPARATE PERMISSION. STATE SURCHARGE PER IT APPLICATION: 181) DAYS — PERMIT LIMIT. I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG, REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION PLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FE* ;A N' AS TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING ED ONDS ASHING ON ITS OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE LCLAIMS FOR DAM A LCLAIMSFORDAIV GESOFWHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTI-YOR INDIRECTLY FRI M THE ISSUANCE 0 THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMEDTOMODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCEANY REQUIREMENTOF ANYCITY ORDINANCE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT RECEIPT/ WV( JRECEI 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANYWAY THE CRY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE IHEREB ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION, THAT THE INFORMATION APPI IdATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF T E OWNER, I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC CALL TI bw , p,bbXb,W,,bod by th, NON AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATC Or WASHINGTON RE ATING TO dI,,g 0111-111 h'Ilhll Dlp.ly� Ild F ... ... -d, ald FOR INSPECTION 1-ri 1� b-b- WCAKMEN'l COMIENS�FANCI AND FEW 11.11, --1 DATE SIGNED OFF, All (425) A 7-1 HELLAS BY IF ATTENTION EXT 333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI. ORIGINAL FILE YELL SPECTOR I/ CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR MEMO TO STREET FILE 655 Edmonds Way Decemb er 10, 2002 P -0032 SUBJECT: Chermak ermit # 2002 Engineering Final Approval A final inspection was performed on November 8, 2002 and the following items were not completed to plan: 1. Drive -aisle width in front parldng lot was less than 24 feet. 0 2. The width of the paved surface between the southeast comer of the building and the fence did n�� , not measure 13 feet as shown on the plan. —1 Due to the location of a power pole on the east comer of the property, the driveway entrance C= M Oj could not be located per plan. This change caus ed the width of the drive aisle to be less than 24 O�! 8 C, feet in width in the front parldng lot, which only has parldng stalls on one side of the drive aisle. The paved surface between the southeast comer of the existing building and the fence did not change with the permitted addition. The plans did not accurately indicated this width and no z change could be made. Final approval was granted on November 12, 2002 and the above referenced items were approved as constructed. -n MM 0 Fn M 0! -q Engineering Technician Z� Cal Z� 0 0 M, t, MICROFILM 'Fe, "AL PROJECT APPROVAI"ORM TO: DATE: !�EMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOIZ, BUILDING DIVISION FROM: FIRE DEPARTNIENT DATE — ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE — PLANNING DIVISION DATE—jJ2j-L/----z-- PROJEC SITE ADDRESS (-9'-S E441xyd� 041,1 PERmr I r #-aM 05Q. ADB#-J1z �(-?_DATE INSPECTED---IILL�L/ �- DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED—:CLv4 A A field inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of PERM CE B6NDS and the granting of: /-----GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED ci Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES a Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector 2. 3. RE-INSpECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL Date— Sip— ocaprvl.doc.l:tenip.bldg:formsIO/OI z 0 0 M '49 M co M 0 -10 0 C -4 K X M M z ,0--1 o -n n M M 0 a; 0,- 0 a 9 CD rn 0 z z --I M co z 0 i 0 M Flt'�*,L PROJECT APPRovAv"IbRm TO: DATE: NMMO TO: PERMIT' COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION FROM: _FlREDEPARTmwTDATE_jd_(/—(?-z0 z, ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE — PLANNING DIVISION DATE — PROJECT SITEADDRES p ER M r r oo 2 o o 3: —A DB _D ATE I N s P E c T E DI L, L - - _o�- DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED .. 1_11(j_�_ A field I inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of PERFORMANCE LIONDS and the granting of: GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL. GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED a Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES a Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector I 2. 3. RE INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES -GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL Date— Sigq_ ocaptvl.docl:tcup.-bldg:fonnsIO/OI z 0 0 rp :q Vi M M 0 0 80 C -4 M X M M z 0-4 z --I x M 0 M M M 0 6 0� CM Cn C Cn M 0 Z z —4 X co z 0 1 0 M FI?6'kL PROJECT PROVAL*43RM TO:_ DATE: MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION FROM: _,,,,_FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE — DATE ���MGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION DATE— PROJECT_R2_Q_29X_ OIL" SrrE ADDRESS PERM1T#Aq—)9--MaZ� ADB# DATEINSPECTED DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO 13E INSPECTEDJ������� A field inspection was conducted to determine flual compliance with approved plans. Final approval denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of: GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED u Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by *inspector I FAMED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES Q Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractorby inspector 2. 3. RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES -GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL Date_ Sign� ocaprvi.doc.I:Wmp.bldg:formsIO/OI z 0 i 0 M OM C 0 M 0 0 C X M M Z -q z 0 -n M M 0 0 0 M C c) 9 co Q 0 Z z -4 x (n z 0 i 0 M INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED SETBACKS ..................... FOUNDATION: Footing...................... cZ- wall ...................... Pier/Porch ............. z Retaining Wall ........... Stab Insulation .......... PLUMBING: Underground ............. M C: Iln 0 0 Rough -in ................... Commercial Final ITI M 0 HEATING: 4-1 Gas Test .................... Gas Piping ........... Equipment ................. Commercial Final MM EXTERIOR SHEATHI NO NAILING r— CM (A .......................... FRAMING ........................ co, 0 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING ;0 INSULATION ................... Floor Insulation z Wall Insulation ........... (D Ceiling Insulation z 0 SHEETROCK N41LING 0 M SPECIAL INSPECT! ON L;