20020095.pdfFP—ERMITEXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
' 'USE
HE
ZO P E R 1.1'T -0 OCI
". ER gj 5
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB SUITE/APT.
RD
_4AGDRESS
BUIII EBB
t�01
�=A Cwnwfi
ED 1 4_11IC, 110�
/�(I,NAIAEI ED
LOT j
110 NO,
m MAILINGADORESS
0
LID FEE S
PUBLIC FIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET Al
M
EXISTING
TE�,�.P_Ah
ZIP
TELEPHONE 110;
FE-UIP-.-IK3AR.N- AT
_.jt!LL.2:ZLJ���
NA
METER SIZE I
LINE 11
go
p
NO 0
Allf:j�
REMARKS
Qp
OWNERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLIORAINAGE
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
A;
ENGINEERING REVIEWEIDIDATE
ADD Ell
w
'hz4o-2-
'DATE
CITY
FIRE REVIEWEGGY
z
STATE LICENSE NUMBER
EXPIRATION DATE
I CHECKED BY
VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADS, BOND
0
_ I
7INS�P.E.CTIO10
.ETE.
PROPERTY TAN ACCOUNT 1ARCELXN.,
_o/
SERA REVIEW
COMPLETE EXEMPT
SIGN AREA
ALLOWWSOPROP
EIGHT
P
AL ED DEED
0 046'z,36 002dA01
EXP I I
2,5 S;/
m
N E
AESIOENTI L
1'�.LUMSINGIMEC"
LCT COVERAQO,�'
ALLOWS. 'FOR
SETBACKS 1;�
FRO SIDE REA
PROPOSED ETBACK.Il .1
FRONT URIBOE REAR
c
I
C3 A)DITION
COMMERCIAL
PLIANC 0
El
'REQUIFITED
rn 0
0
CHANGE OFEUSE
�WY.
c:
E DEL
APARTMENT
SIGN
/PARKING
REOD
.1
1
PLANNING REVIEWED BY OATE :5
-4 m
m m
REPAIR
G
FENCE
A z
CYDS ( - N IT)
e4kk- i2e.,- V-01-911
DEMOLISH TANK 0 OTHER
RP..T [3 .1121,N'ING WALL
RAG 0 RENEWAL
�GE K Y
0 - ;-
OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
p ITY�;
0 -n
P.
J�SINESS
-AqLtf L?mj mtl��
CHECKEDaY
TYPEOFEW10N
0 CCUPANTIZ211
NUMBER
OF
NUMBER
'WE LUNG
7)
1C GROUP
q�-1
MITI
:TOR
15f-Ft!
o STORIES 4�
UN ITS
IES
JAPEA
jAjjj4 LOCACDUPANT
y V)
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
JAL
0
C 0)
PROGRES 3 INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D
9 CA
M 0
7, 0 W A
Z
ki-A Cvt`T(,C��A
>
�T
z
--I
VALUATION
FEE
m
CD
PLAN CHECK FEE
z
13.11.1N.
0 -1 /6 -;230
PLAN CHECK NO:,,4-
rED DATE
PLUMBING
m
MECHANICAL
&0
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
SIDEWALKS,
GRAOING1111L
30 t i
OMAIN (CURBS. DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
STATE SURCHARGE
MIT APPLICATION: ISO DAYS
ZRE
T PERMIT LIMIT. I YE - PROVID 0 WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
ENO REV15W FEES
s
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS, A SIGNS AND SUCCESOR$
ENG, INSPECTION FEE
;APPLICANT.
N NTEREST. AGREES To INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD RAINLEES THE CITY OF
-LANGECAIIN.
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
INSPECTION FEE
AILC�IMIIORDA.AGE�.I.ATEIIIIN�TUIE,ARI�IN D RICTLYOR INDIRECTLY
G I
FR M THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
B I
0 TO MODIFYWAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REGUMEMENTOF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
N=T IN ANY W Y THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.'
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT. AND THAT' AM THE OWNER,OR THE DULY UTHOBIZED AGENT OF
APP [CATION APPROVAL
THEOWNER. IAGREETOCO PLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC
CALL
Th., 1ppl,�Ihb- h1t A P11.11I 119had by 1h,
TION, AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
WORKMEN'S COMPENSAT12��ANCE AND RCW 18,27,
FOR INSPECTION
8e1V.hg 01111,11 el III/he, Dopty� ed F- 11, PlId -d
SIGNED
(425)
OF'I�PLIS EMNAT.N� DATE
�ATE
,Z
/ Z�
771-0220
pf,� till fxw,/yy, 11� I't
-;IIRJ�A��r
_711,11171,10 - -
_.
1, ` AIE
,�ffENT
EXT 333
IT IS UNLA '124CTO US ILDING OR STRUCTURr UNTIL
�OR.00C PY A SU
771 -0221
N�PUL
AS
A FINAL I E TION _ENUMADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
C
'rILE DIOR
YELLO JNSPE
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
5198
�
FAX PINK OWN GOLD ASSESSOR
LOT AREA: 8360 SQ�FT.
LOT COVERAGE: 214'rSQ,FT.
TAX * (PLAT): 004r.330260020e o
453
AVERAGE GRADE CALC.I
451. 4/4 = 451'
MAX, BLDG 14EIGWT ALLOWEDt
451' - 25' - 419,'
A6-TVA I- zr q-7 5- G�"
AEI kk �
TEMPORA A
MAIN, 1311 50.rT.
�ONISTRUCTION
ENTR REQUIRED
UPPER, SOXT.
1113
GARAGE, 110 SO.FT. 3'
I MIN,
z
'01 1� W-O"
RCOMCMR W�V WONSIME MR
mil 4.
D DRWQE
21.2'
4EII 451
DRIVE
56 L 830 80.FT.
APPROVED AS NOTED
a- 33,-0" �UTILITY
EASMrN�T
BY, ENGINE -
td 451 16.00,
Date: I (o./aR,
Ct PRIVATE ROAD
cr-
CL
a -
xi
CITY COP"i
DATUM POINT EL. 450.1a'
XCONC, MON. CASED
+TArTAL-L fLArDMVVf')
W 'TtA Per -ma-
--o—
THIS OFFICE ASSUMES NO RE51-ONSUBILITY AS TO PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF T14E SOIL, NOR DOES IT
VERIFY ACCURACY OF ENGINEERING DATA SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. USE OF PLOT ACKNOWLEDGES ACCEPTANCE
:�E HEALEY ALLIANCE 1-6, INC,
N,11-20THWREET - BELLEVUE, LUA. 59001 � (425)494-3056
PATE
10-14-01
NAME
PLAN
5049
A FR C H I T E r- T 8
L 1 0 T
CONTRAC
NATHAN CONSTRUCTION
eCALE
1 ..2,1-0.
-111
z
0
0
C m
M a
0
80
a
�m
m m
z
1c)
0
m m
u 0)
0
0 Fn
M 0
;u
v,
DRAINAGE REPORT
i N"
FOR
LAMMERSDORF SHORT PLAT
0�
FILE # S-2000-151
CITY
BEING A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 SW 1/4 OF SEC. 31, T. 27 N., R. 4 E., W.M.
CITY OF EDMONDS
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON
m cc)
Parcel #s: 4633-026-002-0000
JRR#01-12
M
m
PREPARED FOR:
NALUND & ASSOCIATES
9792 EDMONDS WAY, PMB #266
EDMONDS, WA 98020
r n
m rn
PREPARED BY:
to
m
JRR ENGINEERING, INC.
18609 76TH AVENUE WEST, SUITE B
LYNNWOOD, WA 98037-4149
PN. (425) 697-6108
FAX (426) 697-4606
ro
z
0
K
//21 /7011
All,
1200
o z;-/zaoa
This report has been prepared by JRR Engineering for Nalund and Associates, Inc. as support
information for a Short Subdivision within the City ofEdmonds. Any revisions to the proposed
project may not use or depend upon this report without the written permission ofJRR Engineering.
City approval for the short plat will require items which are generally as follows:
Provide an off -site analysis
2. Identify existing conditions and possible development impacts
3. Show compliance with City code requirements for drainage
z
Calculations and design plans are based on good engineering practice, City ofEdmonds code
0
requirements, methods and procedures in the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management
Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (1992), and investigation ofthe existing system in the project area.
55 :0
fieneral Site Description/Condition
M
C
m 0
80
C
The subject property (site) consists ofone lot totaling approximately 39,000 SF (0.895 acres) and is
m
located on the South side of242 ,d St. SW approximately 400 ft East of87"Ave. W. Said property
m z
0 -q
has a street address of 8618 242'd St. SW, Edmonds, and is within the SE quarter ofthe SW quarter
C
of Section 3 1, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M., Snohomish County, Washington further
CV
described as:
Vi
Tract 2, Block 26, Plat ofHanbury's Sound View tracts, per plat recorded in Vol. 7 ofplats at
0 -n
"n X
pg. 20, records of Snohomish County, Washington
The site is bounded to the north by a public right-of-way , and on the north, east and west by
m m
0
residential improvements of a similar nature to the subject site.
0
C
M ca
M
Existing drainage at and around this site consists of urban runoff. Atthistimethereisno storm
M
drainage system on the site to collect runoff. The existing building on the site utilizes splash blocks
z
s tifi
and no downstream drainage is currently impacted. No wetland have been iden ed on or adjacent
to the site. The project is outside the floodplain and contains no shorelands.
CD
z
On the north edge ofthe property is an open conveyance system (road side ditch). Driveway culvert
-04
diameters, invert elevation, and flow direction information can be found on the Site Plan. The site
m
currently drains to the road side ditch on the north side ofthe property.
Proposed Drainage -
Developed runoff from the site will be routed northerly similar to the present condition, Anincreasein
impervious area is proposed. Runofffroin the proposed residences and the paved access and parking
areas will be collected via catch basins and conveyed to a detention pipe and then to a Type 2 catch
basin which will contain an outlet control tee. A portion of the conveyance system will also act as the
detention system. The runoffwould then be conveyed to a storm drainage pipe system to the east of
the subject property.
Development 11RAWK-115
The parking configuration, landscaping and drainage improvements are proposed to provide access
and parking for the proposed use and improve the collection of surface water runoff on the site.
No significant erosion has been observed on -site and no significant erosion is anticipated on the
subject property or adjacent properties, due to the proposed development.
Post development peak flows are expected to have no significant impact on existing downstream
conditions as described in the following off -site Analysis & Downstream Conditions summary
information.
It is also anticipated that:
runoffto be diverted onto
(1) Modification to the existing drainage system win not cause
or away from the adjacent downstream property.
(2) The proposed improvements are not expected to aggravate an existing drainage
problem or create a new drainage problem adjacent to downstream properties.
(3) A double orifice control structure is proposed for treatment and for releasing runoff at
pre -developed rates (see plan).
(4) The proposed project conveyance system will contain and convey the 100-year design
storm.
The Clearing Limits which are anticipated consist of and coincide with the property
(5)
lines, which will be marked prior to construction to indicate and delineate proposed
improvements.
&.ji.n/SMi...t.ti.n Control Design
Silt fencing, construction entrance and typical cover techrfiques will be employed to minimize the
potential for erosion and sedimentation. Erosion and sedimentation control details have been provided
in the construction drawing submittals.
0
am
in
0
-40
0
C
m in
01
n
in in
a-
0 co
0 r—
in
in
73,
z
_q
CA
z
9 e
0
m
Summary ofDed9n_
Sods:
Alderwood Series
Hydrologic Group "C"
Runoff Characteristics:
E)dsting & Proposed C.: 95 Meadow
86 Landscape (good condition)
89 Gravel
98 Impervious surfaces
Z,
0
-4
ff
Design Storms:
10-Year Design storm precipitation 2.0 inches
Pi
I 00-Year Desi gn storm precipitation 3.0 inches
C in
pre -Development Condition:
Area = 3 9,000 SF (0.90 ac.)
0�
-40
0
0
Site
Landscape Area = 36,590 SF (0 .84 ac) (9k C-
M
Impervious Area= 21410 SF (0.06
C z
io-Year Design storm Peak runOff= 0.12 Ofs
I 00-Year Design storm peak runoff 0.26 cfs
0
post -Development Condition:
Site Area = 39,000 SF (0.90 ac.)
Li
in in
Fn
00
Landscape Area 21,140 SF (0.495 ac.)
CW
impervious Are a= 17,860 SF (0. 410 ac.)
in 0
10-Year Design storm peak runoff= 0.29 cfs
100-Y ear Design storm peak run7.50 cf§
Detention Required: 839 fO
z
Detention Provided: 964 ft'
co),�
z
-04
0
in
NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE
IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT.
er to wo y oBed'9Z096'sP-WP-9'lS PUZOZMS 909 -*911S
I I I 1-14-m.
fs
m
TO
S! !Rml-N
= jsl
VNIN
N
(AV HSIWHDAS
ms is omzvz ms is (INetz
JV,
7 N H31103
00%
Ah
ru '1�g,
P ms is H182
z 17.� Is flm z K s
M co 4
Rw (M
N1 VNm" ms
(is ) ms It
:3 laVW ps is R
I'S �W ) ms i
8W —NI t' d
awn'! su MICH . . . . . . . . . . .
U IsIll
-v H
Js
is
AN
Jjj5oz
(PiEte
gils1t,
z
AW"
z
1 T
0
Jell
SRI -44
_N 0
!C:
O"n
ITE mm
17
2
9 CD
M 0
z
IL
co
z
0 m
Printed from TOPO 1997 Wildflower Productions (WWWAO O.Com)
N"T'S'
The site is generally at the same grade as the abutting properties, and is generally not affected by
"upstream off -site areas". Storm runoff generally is limited to that which is generated "on -site".
Downstream conditions consist of a road side ditch and pipe drainage system draining to the Edmonds
Way/SR-99 interchange ROW. Mnimal erosion has been observed around the existing grading. No
significant erosion is anticipated on the subject property due to the proposed development.
Post development peak flows are expected to have no significant impact on: existing downstream
z
conditions
01
Downstream Conditions
THE SUBjECT PROPERTY PRESENTLY DRAINS INTO A NORMAL ROADSIDE DITCH LOCATED
ra -q
ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE WaSTING IMPROVEMENT IN TEE 242ND ST. SW RIGHT OF WAY,
C
m
WHICH DIRECTS THE STORM WATER WESTERLY INTO A 12 IN. CULVERT SYSTEM, THE INLET OF
WHICH IS LOCATED 24 LF EAST FROM THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, HAVING AN I.E. WHICH HAS BEEN
0
80
C
FOUND To BE Too HIGH IN ELEVATION To SERVE THE OUTFALL WATERS MOM A DESIGNED
-4 z
X m
DETENTION SYSTEM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.:
m
0
THE PREFERRED ROUTE HAS BEEN FrUND TO DIRECT THE OUTFALLFROM THE DETENTION
THAT WILL
SYSTEM, EAS TERLy ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF 242ND ST. SW TO A POSITIVE OuTFALL
MEET THE NEEDS OF THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. FROM THE NE CORNER:OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS
ROAD THENCE EAST IN THE 242ND ST. ROW, 107 Fr. TO AN INTERSECTION WITH AN EXISTING 12-
0'"
-n
OUTFALL FROM AN EMSTING PCB; THENCE NORTH IN AN E)(ISTING 12" SD: 20 Fr. MORE OR LESS INTO
AN E)aSTING CB-T-11; TTIENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING STREET
AS ALO THE UTH ID IN
IMPROVEMENT 53 LF TO AN EMSTING CB-T-I; THENCE CONTINUING E T NG So S E
m rn
0
A 12"ADS DRAIN 60 LF TO AN ENT STING OPEN DITCH; THENCE CONTINUING IN AN OPEN DITCH TO AN
0
0
EMSTING 12" SD INSTALLED UNDER THE CUL-DE-SAC AT TEE FAST END OF 242ND SWAND DIRECTED
a ca
K a)
TO CONNECTION IN AN EMSTING WSD()T CB-T-H ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE EDMONDS SR 104 R[W;
M 0
z
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY IN THE DOT STORM DRAIN SYSTEM ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF SR104,
-4
z
0)
z
0
m
0 1 Z
7,
r� co
17, 1 0/
co ol
01- 01 -T
0 02
ofido)
1 2 1 W25 4 4 02 0/ aa(&
LU
:00 0
(841W
00 1041
3
DO
2
U*
2
00 11 02
42 d. ST S.W.
--T
001
w 2-
0.2
ol
03 2
71
Ix2c.
ENGINEERING PLANNING SERVICES
NO.: 12
Drnlimrt wmp-
I
z
�n
om
0
ol
0
c
m
z
0-
nx
m M
0
0
0
M
z
9
0
8g�WNO FnJ
I Mo�-'IricQsa I
M Typical (�Mons)
IDSM n OWNER
45o. z HANS LAMMERSDORF
4ga.A P.O. BOX 534, EDMONDS,98020
APPLICANT
NALUND & ASSOC.
9792 EDMONDS wAY, PmB #266
EDMONDS, WA 98020
I rn- tr, I '
10 01
r E-3 LAND USE CONSULT.
M. B. MEYRING
23423 HWY 99
EDMONDS, WA 98026
425-778-3101
U+i 1.+le5
6wCr1v-r 01.9mp*1c. vidw
SQ'^Qr' 014Mpteview
4598 pavQr PK30 No. I
-T
(2k2pVcrx2 C=;TE
C
j
Gro!5sArQa Z9000SR
U2 qcd Ck2eartrz±ion.
Me
A
17h;c+ ?-, iBlck 2G
F)Hoinbur't35 Sound
-T rctci—. par Pla+ racorded
tw
-19 in Voljmg- 7 ci� Pia+5
CL+ Pa"a F-0
k' I-- U Racorr-Ys o-F Snohomish
bt� co'r�+3
-r M -a
q, A,,+ No 4eZZ5 -02G-OL--OL
0 %A�
U) F--rtjn-r- 2!5v-r.
fRq r - I E) F+z
ig
1"50.00
.455,0
.�O
BGjb 4 S.W.
'E�)CA E: "=40-'-
Z
0
M
om
c
M0
0
0
a
M M
o'n
.A
M M
065 , I
0
0
C:
3: CA
M 0
Z'
9
0
M
-T-2
01* 04 w
ZAA
N 89 07 04 w
FMD 'gi
AIt
LOT I
CA 4
1-.40ozWous
N
=.Zcl3s,.2R,30-f Z130
tzs
SCALF, I'L 409-
40
LOT 2-
(733at $rime.)
0
40, 80
N 93V-a7-'OV'W
�A
1 9--
20
LE6EWD
LOT 3
*-r2�X047RB/l-'J02(9---6T
SF W
2-4WAZ t)1.5k'lFt4Al-HEV
A(A 17068 19 -U4 C&r� O*W
14 -99-17'04"W
LOT,+
azes SF
89107
zo
(Z.j,fot,:F IMP)
71
E — —i
N 89* 0*7'04�W
Y4
aq
LF-G/NL DESCRIPTION
pp- o pos ct.)
ALT. nv TVACT 7. RTnr.y 74; PT.AT nw mAmuimvt*
z
V7,
gi
om
M
0
80
c
--j C
m
n
-4
3:
m m
0
0
a
m
m
'SPECIFY STORM OPTION:
S.C.S. TYPE71A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION
r
ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES)
10,24,2
---------------------------
------------------------------------------
S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION
10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP.
K X Ct, 0 V
--------------- ---------- _et ----------------------------------
ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1
Z'
0
.84,85.3,.06,98,31.18
m
DATA PRINT-OUT:
AREMACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)
A CN A CN
c
.9 .8 85.3 .1 98.0 31.2
m 0
PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
0 C
7.83 2842
m
ENTER (d:1(pathlfilename[.ext1 FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED MPOGRAPH:
10yexna
ro
.9 .9 85.3 .1 98.0 31.2
0 -n
PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
7.83 2842
m m
.12
0
ENTER [d:1(pathlfilename[.ext1 FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH:
0
10yexna
m 0
Z
SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP
c mopaseo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2
Z�
.49,86,.41,98,7.53
5i
DATA PRINT-OUT:
Z
0
AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)
0
A CN A CN
M
.9 .5 86.0 .4 98.0 7.5
PEAK-Q(CFS) /T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
.29 7.83 4150
ENTER (d:1[path1Eilename(.extj FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH:
10yprna
SPECIFY STORM OPTION*
S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION
ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES)
100,24,3
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION
loo-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP.
------------- trm�4 ------------------------------------
---------------
ENTER- A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1
.84,85.3,.06,98,31.18
0
0
DATA PRINT-OUT:
AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)
A CN A CN
m
.9 .8 85.3 .1 98.0 31.2
c
PFAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
.26 7.83 5473
c
m
m
ENTER (d:1[pathlfilename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH:
100yexna
z
.9 .8 85.3 1 98.0 31.2
co
VOL(CU -FT)
0 _n'
N, I
PEAK Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS)
.264C-- 7.83 5473
m M
ENTER (d:][path]filename[.ext3 FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH:
C-1)
0
0 Fn
100yexna
C V)
C co
SPECIFY: C CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P PRINT, S - STOP
M 0
c Po r. erb
- - -----------------------------------------
ErRR: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2
z
.49,86,.41,98,7.53
DATA PRINT-OUT:
AREA(ACRES) PERVIOU§/ IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)
z
A CN A CN
0
9 5 86.0 .4 98.0 7.5
m
PF.AK-Q(CFS)/" T-P'EAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
.50 -fiv— 7.83 7075
ENTER Cd:][pathlfilename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH:
1100yprna
SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS
1) TYPE OF FACILITY: TANK
2) TANK DIAMETER(ft), STORAGE DEPTH(ft): 3.00, �3.00
3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in); .00
ol
d,
4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: 100yprna
0
m
5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE(cfs): .26
6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 1
TEST WM 1 FILEXAME: 10yprna TARGET RELEASE(Cfs): .12
M
7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 2, 3.00, 8
c
ma
8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO
oc
-4c
m
ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED):
jo-4
0
15) NUMBER OF TEST IIYDROGRAP1113: I
0
TEST HYD I FILENAME: 10yprna TARGET RELEASE(Cfs): .12.
7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 2,' 3.00, a
m m
8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO
a
0
o
ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED):
cca
M 0,
0
INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 2220 CU-FT
BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q -MAX(Cfs)
16
DIA.= 1.85 INCHES
TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft)
1.5
DIA.= 1.74 INCHES
0
m
PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE
DESIGN ftYD: .50 .26 .26 2.99 IP 839
TEST HYD 1: .29 .12 .12 1.55 430
SPECIFY: D DOCUMENT, R REVISE, A ADJUST ORIF, E ENLARGE, S STOP
ROUTING DATA:
STAGE(FT)
DISCHARGE(CFS) STORAGE(CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT)
.00
.00
.0
.0
.30
.05
43.7
.0
.60
.07
119.7
.0
.90
.09
212.1
.0
1.20
.10
313.9
.0
1.50
.11
420.2
.0
1.50
.11
420.2
.0
1.80
.17
526.5
.0
2.10
.20
628.4
.0
2.40
.22
720.8
.0
2.70
.24
796.7
.0
,.,3.00
.26
840.5
0
:0
3.10
.47
840.5
3.20
.85
840.5
.0
3.30
1.20
840.5
.0
3.40
1.35
840.5
.0
3.50
1.48
840.5
.0
0
AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY:
.0 MINUTES/INCH
m
SPECIFY:
F FILE, N NEWJOB,
P PRINT IF/OF,
R REVISE, S STOP
'o
Z
>
O-n
'n
m m
0
0
c (At
mo�
Z�
--- --- ----
ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES
DmlPrt Narnelfi-�lca�boeF �!;Hog-r No.:
01,
M:
M:
rn
a
.mo
A
a-
0 -n
n Lu,
mm
0
0
c:
0),
�7
z
0
fn
DeSigned UJ-p. Ch.kLd Mt. Sheit-of-
PAGE 02
12/10/2061 11:03 4254542810 THE HEALEY ALLIANCE
AvEPAGr GRADE CALC
LOT AREA: 53&0 SQ.FT, 4SI x 414 . 451'
LOT cOvERAGE: 24-1 SQ,FT. (25,190 MAX� FBILOG HEIr-HT ALLOWED,
0 45f 25' 41r-' k_
TAX - (F-LAT)t 00463302&0020
491
45S
ir, oo'
45
z
E3SIBL
----------------
4511 ...... ...... ............... 1451 0
m
my IT! 0
80
OF
m
m
c
mA% ISM SaYl.
WPM Jll� O&I.K. >
oARAOry 110 eQ FT-
251 o
MIN. _n
M m
0
...... ...... 0
c
A51
49.1 .. .... ...... D�IVE
030 EO.FT.
�55 L
33'-0" 1 ITY
491
TE ROAD
z
0.3
DATUM pOINT 5L. 45 9
AppROXIMATE CUT� %r m
2141 SQYT. X 1,5'm 3221 60-Fr- ONr,. mm CASED 0
�REDI$TRIBUTE CUT DIRT ON SITE)
t4OR DOES IT
LilY A5 To PHY51CAL CHARACTERISTIce, OF T14E SOIL,
T;415 OFFICE A6$UMES NO RESPONr'lel OTHFIRS. VgC! OF PLOT ACKNOWLEL>r.Es ACCEPTANCE
VERIFY ACCURACY OF ENGINEFRINr- DATA 5UPPLIED 15
DATE 0045
T E HEALE LLIANCE PS, INC, j(:)44-01
N.C. 20T,4 STREET '0001 IA25) 4EA-30�
T E C T 7" NA-rWAN CONSTRUCTION
A F, C 14
SCALE
OEC 11 2001
PERMIT COUNTER
Height Calculation Worksheet
Address:
Date: 4
Inspector(s): On's
1. Datum Point: 450, C�
2. Datum Point Elevation:
0
M;
3. Average Grade:
—49
i
4. Maximum Elevation Allowed:,4971 47(p .60
(average grade) + 25'
41
a m
m 0
5. Reference Point Elevation Shot to House:
0,
9.'jdatura elevation) + kgrade to transit,level line shot to house)
m
6. Measurements from line shot onto house to roof ridge:
C
>
0
m M
0
0 Fn
C V)
z
z
z
Total
0
7. Actual Elevation: d 7(reference point elevation) + (measurements
from #6)
Conclusion:
a) (actual) is greater Qsj jtl�n�n (allowed); therefore the house is/
is not over the height requirement per ECDC 16.20.30 requirements
UTEMPWILDINGNISOHeight Calculation Worksheet.doc
FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM
TO:_
DATE:
mEmo To: PERMIT COORDINATOR, 13UILDING DIVISION
FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE—
E).6(LAC-Xr ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE
PLANNING DIVISION DATE --
PROM
SITEADDRESs—
PERMIT A022-6095- —ADB#--------PATEINSPECTED�—,�Jzl.l.—ov—
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED—E-1&�—A I—
A field inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval
denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of
PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of:
�-Z GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
u Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector
FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES
ci Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector
2.
3.
RE-INSpECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date Si
ocaprvl.doc.l:temp:bldg:formsIO/O1
z
C M
M 0
--1 0
0 0
M
M z
ID -
C.2
>
0 -n
M M
0 V5
0 �
M
0)
9 Cl)
M
z
X
z
Ch
z
0
M
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR
DATE APPROVED
SETBACKS .....................
FOUNDATION:
Footing......................
Wall.........................
Pier/Porch .................
Retaining Wall ..........
Slab Insulation ..........
PLUMBING:
Underground.............
J,
Rou gh-In ...................
Commercial Final
HEATING:
vz
GasTest ....................
Gas Piping ........... —
Equipment .................
Is
Co rc I Final
Imme
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
NAILING .............. ...........
FRAMING
vv.\
?
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING'...
INSULATION ...................
Floor Insulation
Wall Insulation ...........
Ceiling Insulation
PAS
SHEETROCK NAILING
SPECIAL INSPECTION
14A e . .... ...
4-
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY ..............
Side Sewer f)
Ar.-ou!Pr,!d t�
-nemlptv-
Date
D
()jdd1:2L
x77h,,r,rrUwf.zrE1
,ze
It-
t.=.nt Pf-1 2 $--rkecelfit
z
0
0
0 M
M
0
80
C
M
10
0 -n
M M
0 J)
M
0)
0)
M 0
Z
z
z
0�
IT!