Loading...
20020179.pdfPERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS ERM T ZONE S NUMEIER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITFJAPT# ADDRESQ I t OWNER NAMEINAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAMEISUSDIVISION No. LOT NO� I 'Du 1c5 7L 0 140 777173 MAILING ADDRESS � fpj) JX) LID FEE $ IT W Y PER OFFICIAL MAP LIC aj�;j i P­ft-.z--­ g ;m ' �REET EXISTING 50 PROPOSED S­ U.. P-It R�v CITY ZIP ITELIPHO L it: 1�i_ I REQUIRED DEDICATION FT NAME A LINEIS I NO.OFj4RES ETM` PWEQUIRED :5 1 YES NO E3 ADDRESS REMARI(S OWNERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTRO-s-IN-E CITY ZIP jT1111HON1 41c', _L:(._A_ 4 wAxL9-6D6mm(I�p FwAL NAME _D6 tENGINEERING Rc��Cc� ett� REVII WED/ ATE AIIDRES(S,,,, FIRE REVIEWED By DATE or- STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# I INSPECTION -k 11GO NO OSTED /-,')/ - I3YPS` NO r 41 PROPERTY ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. $EPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMI�, SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED A PROPOSED e2 IG"' 5 S 'V� EXP , *.EW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED FRON� SID' REAR OPOSED SEHIACKS (FT. F. AM 1, COMPLIANCE R 0 S-3-5/0" t5 /5 0 ADDITION 0 COMMERCIAL Ei 'MANGE OF U E PARKING LOT AREA I PLANNING REVIEWED BY 'DATE RE MODEL [3 APARTMENT SIGN RECT, I PROVIDED '_7-f 0 1 NCE REPAIR T FT1 —X_Fr) -2 REMARK�S V�-- / 0 DEMOLISH [3 TANK rl OTHER ABASE RETAINING WALL '1�fG.A ... T 1:1 SOCKERY [3 RENEWAL 6 2�'7. a -ennIe UWE OF USE, BUSINESS OR FVTTR EXPLAIN: '--,i CHECKED BY -TIPE 01 CONSTRUCTIW CODE OCCUPANT _U, q 1- GROUP NUMBER � _) J OF I N OFJ 0 ITICAL 'CAL AREAS — SPEDUME `N'P OCCUPANT STORIES UNITS NUMBER REC Ur. D LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE Is REMARKS EPRnGRFSS INSPIECTIONS PER USC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D 3. VALUATION URCE 0��IaO OTS 0 E 1 4 L ID I Building �' PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE Plumbing 01 _q5-�j Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO k: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading ri M D :3 OMAIN (CURBS. SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE — SEPARATE PERMiSSION. Engr. Review P MRAPPLICATION: INDAYS PPERMBILIMIR I YEAR. PROVID - WORK IS STARTED WITHIN INDAYS Engr. Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION -PLICANT ON BEHALF 011111 Oil HER 1POU6E. HEIRS, A11IGNS AND 1UcESLMS Traffic Mitigation IN INTEREST, AGREES To INDEMNIFY!, DEFEND AND HOLD IIAROUE�S THE CITY 01 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Review ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAUES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY 9 FROM THE ISSUANC OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODI�. WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF Y CITY ORDINANCE Fire Inspection NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE C17YS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION. - I HERE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVE IS CORRECT� AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. No PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION WORKMEN'S COMPENSAT_19N,�NCE AND RCW 16.27. (OWNER 00 AGENT) 0 E SIG ED (425) T, :rzal !l� 771-0220 ATTENTION M 1333 T IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771 -022 1 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX 10101 FEE Recording Fee City Surcharge state surcharge Plan Chk Deposit Receipt # TotalAmountDue Receipt #It qZ54 I q;q .dF .. ... P'Id. And ,-P-1d.d. __ "'M-311zto 0AIGrIN.-FILE YELLOW. INSPECTOR PINK - OWNER GOLD � ASSESSOR In z 0 ch -4 0 3: C: m M 0 0 --1 0 0 C: -4 C m m M Z JO, -4 0 n -I m m IT a Fn I 0 FT, C (1) C cirl M 0 z CO z ITT RECEIVED FES 7 Ro N SIDE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. AE OTHER OR TA A C T 997 roMWN -- ao-bo OPEN SPACE BUILDING �7-T, SCALE ,�;�,',SEIBACK UNE(TYP-) 330 LOT _COVMAG� LOT AREA 5,730 S.F. Lot TAX ACCT. PARCEL 332 -WEW —FLAr(NOT ASSIFNED) 01- 4 30 LOT ;.F LOT _SLCPE 5 IOX MAX ROVED AS NOTED BY ENGINEERING APP —,,Zate: .7;r C;�� 810* --'rTM �UAII I.E. 32*.13(19'S) PLACE W. ED FIRE L HYDRANT A P OVED PLA NING JWMOUS SUREA CA—LOS- FKUrUZ,tJJ PLOT PLAN PROPOSED PAno- NIA pRoposm offljNAY 25 &F. PROPOSED VE N)A 4 FOR HEIGHT CA ILOS COLN ESTATEs LoT..4 420 IN NEI OF SECTIOR 36.T.27 N.,R.3 E 'c' : B&24 NDS 0 - 329.55 CITY 10HOMISH, UN INGTON AM GRADE 7442 AMAL - — - PER VARI MAMUM . W ,#.W (25' + 2.3W V / �,) A) sHEET 1 OF 3 LI 6 zF py !WVBZ:6 ED* IZ-Cqlg:i !966L us saf, !vSj :As weS 0 om 0 Co M A Io on "n m M c; 0 0 M c: M 0 z q z z 0 d 0 m RECEIVED FEE'? 1 7-1 pyDEVEOPMENT SEVICES CTR. 47W TAACT 997 so. coMWDN OPF-N BUILDING SCALE 1"-20' SMACK :UNE(TYP-) z LOT COVERAGE ?5 LOT AREA 5.730 S.F. 4 m 5, 0 LOT' V. LIR� &SI PARTSL& m 0 33279 A 'E, ".�"T SIGNED) 0 LOT SLOPE MM 5.1 mz A 'o --I APPROVE00"WED 5; BY ENGINEERING 330.24 0) c 0 -n Date:, Ja, 02— n N Dols m M 4,8 . 0 V—) --- --33 0 5 oe EX. SIDENNALK M 0, 81.0* IM 324.13(lirS) z 99TH PLACE W. Ek FIRE. z HYDRANT/ APPROVED BY PLA NI m RFACE CALCS. AWM%Mwlo�- PLOT PLAN S.F. pRCpoSM PATIO: N/A pROMED DRIVEWAY- 425 S.F. pRoposeD DECK; N/A FOR HEIGHTCALC�L L NCOLN ESTATES LOT 4 A IV I NI Akl�-"lll IN NEI T N.,R.3 E.,W.M. 74 SEC y Tlop'=DMON 'c' BE24 0 M.55 CIT , E D ! N GTON 7y. A GRAM OHOMISH OLINTY. WAS NGTON AMAL ER VARI E) MA)WUM W (25' + 7-38 P 0 1 �f0l'L' SHEET I OF 3 APPLIC NIT CO (,,I '!D 5. lvql :AfI Wes RECEIVED FE", 2 1 FR SIDE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. REAR ------ OTHER HEIQK TRACT 997 OPEN SPACE BUILDIN SCALE 1-20! .SETBAM UNE(TYP. qgS2 LOT COVERAGE Iz LOT AREA 5.730 S.F. zo 4 5,730 LOT OT ASSIGNED) 332 0 NEW PLAT(N P? LOT SLOPE A 10% MAX APPROVED AS NOTED. 1 33024 BY ENGINEERING c D, C, -I L a Ceq- N 1) 53, 0 1 EX. SIDEWALK 61. I.E. 324.13(10'S) 9 PLACE W. 9 TH EX FIRE HYDRANT APPROVED BY PLAN I VIOUS SURFACE CALCS. -ROOF S.F. PROPOSED PATI N�A PLOT PLAN " Y PR ED DRIZA 425 S.F. n OSED DCM* N/A FOR NOCK CALCS. COLN ES TA TES - LOT 4 IN NE1 _90-TION 36,T.27 N.,R.3 E.,W.M. A LAN IN N c - =24 IN INE 4 0 . :529.55 - CITY OF EDMONDS e C oleeS OHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON AM GRADIE ­320.0 A 'R v� AMAL PEMR VARI MAXIMUM - 3%.M. (25' + Z3W T r 1 OF 3 _STR_ ET [ZILE I !Vsj :As JUGS !A6(3L eta gn, z ma 0 C) oc ic MM M z 10-4 O'n M M 0 0 3: co 0 z z 9 0 m Height Calculatfon Worksheet Address: Date: Inspector(s): 1. Datum Point: v� 2. Datum Point Elevation: 0'' 0: 2 3. Averag ge Grade: ?X. Maximum Elevation Allowed: YX'�S�averg.gad.)+25'= 35;7, TG 0 M 0: 5. Reference Point Elevation Shot to House: -1 00" '1�3(datum elevation) + 4 A5(grade to transit.level line shot to house) 'T�,O 'L, rn 6. Measurements from line shot onto house to roof ridge: Cal 0 rn rn 0 C= ca M 0 z Total: Z M 7. Actual Elevation: 6 (9 ireference point elevation) J�P (measurements 79 from #6) Conclusion: '355,3o (actual) is greater�ilessthap 357 (allowed); therefore the house is/ is not over the height requiremenTFer—ECDC 16.20.30 requirements UTEWBUILDINGWIS011eight Calculation Worksheet.doe 14:!)u 14*�bbQ411Jt11 11UXNtK=JUNM =UIM� I.QM V, Cornerstone 17625-130th Ave. NE, 6102 Woodinville, WA 98072 Phon 425444-1077 Geotechnical, Inc. Fax: 4254"-1987 Mairch5,2002 Mr. Michael Hennessey z! Metro Homes C) 1910.120'h Place SE N" Everett, WA 99208 'n Letter A C M 0 100' Avenue West Site (Woodbury at Edmonds, aka. Lincoln Estiaes) .q 0 0 C Snohomish County, Washington CG File No. 1071 m in Dear Mr. Hennessey: You have requested that we prepare this letter in response to comments made by the City of 0'n� n ri Edmonds. You informed us that the City is seeking individual lot review and site monito ng prior to issuing the building permits. We, as Nelson-Couvrette and Associates, Inc., have m M 0 5j, previously completed a geotec hnica) report for the project, dated December 20, 1999. During the 0 0 Fn investigation, we encountered fill material at the site as discussed in the geotechnical report. C th 0 Site monitoring to observe earth and soil work during the development stage of this project began the X on June 15, 2001 (Field Report #1) and ended on July 25, 2001 (Field Report #18). During earthwork phase, we observed and monitored mass grading work to document compliance with z out recommended engineering standards. We al so observed and documented installation of CO z TO&CfiCS, utilities, roads, and retaining walls. 0 m It is our opinion that a plan review is not necessary for the individual lots prior to issuing permits. However, because of the documented fill at the site, it is our opinion that the foundation subgrade should be evaluated by Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc, prior to placement Of the footing forms- During these site visits, we will confir -in the design bearing capacity and document our observations in a field report. 03/05/2M 14:50 142t)8441JU t UUXNLKtD I UNt UCU I W, Letter 10e Avenue West Site (Woodbury at Edmonds, a.k.a. Lincoln Estates) Marob 5, 2002 CG File No. 1071 Page 2 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report or ifwe can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Z-i m 0' 0 C; M, M 10 3 530 > NA rj) 0 'n M M' Rick B. Powell, PE 0 Senior Engineer AAS:RBP:nt 0; W T o Copies Submitted cc: Ms. Tricia Bermon Z 0 ITT Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. L FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM TO: DATE: MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATO11, BUILDING DIVISION FROM: IRE DEPARTMENT DATE._ Z 6 1 LPF$Ll— G DIVISION DATE -7 -0 2-- —ENG z 0 PLANNING DIVISION DATE =j 0 P 55 --1 qq�L pl- (Ai, 0 a: C M SITE ADDRESS M 0 0 PERM[IT AOO'� 1 ADB DATEINSPECTED� 80 a DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED FlOkL-:� M M A field inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval X 0) denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of BONDS 0 -n n � PERFORMANCE and the granting of: M M GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL 0 V5 0 0 C 0) M 0 Z ;U GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED > z u Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector C/) z 0 4 FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES 3 M u Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractorby inspector 2. 3. RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL Date Sign ocaprv1.doc.1:temp-b1dg:fbnns 10/01 Oat RECORD OF INSPECTIOM INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED —0 SETBACKS ..................... FOUNDATION: S �oz Footing ...................... .......................... Pier/Porch Retaining Wall ........... Slab Insulation PLUMBING: Underground Rough -in ................... Commercial Final HEATING: P/) GasTest .................... <1 Gas Piping Equipment ................. Commercial Finair EXTERIOR SHEATHING NAILING ........... MS, t', FRAMING ............. .......... FIRST FLOOR FRAMING... INSULATION ................... Floor Insulation Wall Insulation ........... Calling Insulation vy) SHEETROCK NAILING SPECIAL INSPECTION MISCELLANEOUS FINAL APPROVAL FOR V)0 —7 OCCUPANCY ............... Side Sewer 0 AmoutPaId $ --pires DatehSUed-------r Amount Pdd�rlecp Omit, C,4 DdePum 'Od ------------- t.mount Paid z 0 M C: a I , ., ; In 0 0 C ITI 1TI z ,C) --I l,r, I C: — 5z rj) 0 *T! i�', n �o MITI a 0 o Fn a 0) C co ITI 0 ;a z z 0 M