20020287.pdft DATE RECEIVED
42�Lp__
PERMIT EXPIRES
areses
CITY OF EDMONDS
us
ZONE
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB
ADDRES
11 _4�sco SUITEI T#
Fa,,/
..rMJT�OF BUSI
0
or 0
PLAT NAMEISUBDIVISION
NO.
I LOT NO.
L�D 0.
15
A a I
7 74
L
_LID EE S
-se
ZG 1�vp_
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
W P.171I a -
'.ear' iie. a
ZIP
"Ed., ol 4.f
TELEPHONE
0?j(
L/2 D
EXISTING -
REQUIRED DEDICATION-
PROPOSED -
FT
NAME e-00
METER SIZE I
LINE SIZE
I NO. OF FIXTURES
Y PAY REQUIRED
ES C3 No
ADDRESS
'2-
/ /J
REMARKS
OWNERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLIDRAINAGE
JIM
C
T)
FIRE REVIEWED BY
FIRE R " 0 By
DATE
CITY
ZIP
TELEPHONE
r
VARIANCE OR CU
SHORELINE OR ADB#
SIECTION
RE
I SEND
STED
STATE LICENSE NUMBER
EXPIRATION ATE
Aplfnq P
0 YES XN.
rEEWE
M
SEPA REVIEW
SIGN AREA
HEIGHT
1143FITY ACC NT,1A.R1Ek,
W"y
COMPLETE "S."T
ALL BED
AL=POSED
()Z4-
V'_ 'T'
.
X'
NEW
RESIDENTIAL
U
13 PLUMBING I MECH
LOT COVERAGE
A
ALLOWED PROPOSED
REQUIRED SETBACKS IM.
FRONT SIDE REAR
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT
FRONT UPSIDE REARI
ADDITION
C .... RCIA1
TE:
QQMUA`CEQR
COME' C. ON
F a
CHANGE OF USE
PARKING
LOT AREA
PLANNING RI
REMODEL
SIGN
RE __k_. I.E.
.f 'RZ
REPAIR
GRADING CY.S
FENCE
( - X Fhj1,EMARKS
0 DEMOLISH
0 TANK
OTHER
[3 GARAGE
FORT
RETAINING WALL
E3 RENEWAL
CAR
ROOKERY
fA_nLI1-1'
-jo Fz4Ne- ADmi i-) AF P6 PW
(TYPE OF USE. 17 aSS RACTRTFy) EXPLAIN:
CHECKEDBY
OC UPANT
ITYPE�
GROUP
NUMBER
OF� ...
[N)UMSER 0
G�)/'4
CRITICAL
1 AREAS
.....
PED'AL IN TOR
VC
REQUIRED _
JAREA
LO-UFANT
OCAD
rO 09 DONE I.E.A.K. I
1�111OGRIESS INStECT12NS PER UBC 11011MINAL INSF
J/ 4-v
Ocif-ecf 6-
C
Plan Check
I a IT
HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE %
I hit I
Building
u IT
zSTED DATE
BID I
Plumbing
I U
Mechanical
Mo.".'
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE W6RK NOT THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
t: Be DONE ON PRIVATE PROPER" ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
Recording Fee
DOMAIN (CURDS, SIDEWALKS. DRIV EWAYS, MARGUSES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
[Gradim
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr, Review
City Surcharge
PER RAPPLICATION: ISSDAYS
PERMIT Lasm I - PROVID WORK IS STARTED WITHIN too DAYS
MR
Engr. Inspection
I
State Surcharge
566 BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICAN7. ON BEI ALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
Traffic Mitigation
Plan Chk Deposit
IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
Fire Review
Receipt #
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANC OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY
Fire Inspection
Total Amount 1) us
DEEMED TO WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY ORDINANCE
MODIFY
RMNA " PROVISION'
0 NCJ
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITTS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.-
Landscapoinsp.
L
Receipt #
FORMATION
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT HAV READ THIS APPLICATION; THMAT THE INFORMATION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
AD NT OF
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
-EINSTRUC
THE OWNER, I AGREE To COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC.
CALL
T ph..tion I.... p.haft ..III signed by the
his ap
EMPLOY..
TION; AND IN DOING THE ORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
IN N W, .
EAT . To
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION
Sea ding Offid.1 /I ""'ay: and Foes are paid. and
."'s a,
..Ipl I—ka-11dried in spa- p—Ided.
WORKMENS COMPENSATION I NCE AND RCW 18-27.
OF IAL ATU DATE
N TE mNE
(425)
771-0220
!ZL112-Z,
BED By bAT5
A; E NIT li) N
EXr 1333
OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR
771-0221
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
FAX
ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW 4INSPP&TOR
PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR
1010,
11
I
z
C M
IT, a
0
80
C
X m
M Z
0 -n
IT
M ITI
03-)
0 r-
0 IT
a cio
C 0)
M 0
Z E
z
:0
65
z
ITT
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT
By: Rick Lippold, R.W. Beck Inc.
Date: July30,2002
Client: City of Edmonds
Project: Lift Station No. I Renovation
Contractor: Hisey Construction
z
Weather: Overcast, 60's
Inspection Notes:
The purpose of the field visit was to do a rebar inspection of the new dry well roof slab and wet
well hatch opening slab. The concrete pour was planned for Wednesday, July 31. Contractor
0 in
crew included Superintendent Steve Reedy and two laborers. Pam, City of Edmonds was also
C
m
0
present during a portion of the site visit.
0 C
The reinforcement was mostly complete. It generally looked good.
m m
On the wet well 10" slab, I asked that the rebar cage be moved because it was not lined up over
the north wall at the east end. They did this while I was there. I also asked that the existing
concrete surface be cleaned up prior to concrete placement. Steve Reedy assured me this would
0 -M
be done. The #3 hooks for the curb were not in place yet. They would be located exterior of the
-4
hatch frame.
in M
On the new dry well roof slab, again I asked that the surface be cleaned up prior to the pour.
Vi
rim)
0
0 FM
Steve said they would also caulk the form joints. On the north hatch opening I noted that an extra
C ca
bottom bar was missing. An extra #5 straight bar was available which was being inserted into the
in 0
bottom mat while I was still on -site.
M
I asked Steve how he was going to cure the slab. He said a curing compound would be used. I
said this was acceptable and to be sure to put enough on, I also asked about consolidation during
z
placement. Steve said they would be using a vibrator. Steve asked if the side forms could be
pulled on Thursday. I said this should be ok. Steve asked for an extra cylinder (for a total of 5) so
they could do additional concrete strength tests if necessary.
z
0
m
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT edmonds.doe
City of Edmonds — Lift Station No. I Renovation
Wall Rebar Field Inspection Report
By: Rick Lippold, R.W. Beck Inc.
Date: July 16,2002
0
Client: CityofEdmonds
Project: Lift Station No. 1 Renovation
Contractor: Hisey Construction
49,
Weather: Clear and Warm
-0) -4
Inspection Notes:
M
m
The purpose of the field visit was to do a rebar inspection ofthe walls. Application ofthe
shotcrete is tentatively scheduled for Thursday of this week. The inspection included discussing
m
M
the project with the site superintendent Steve.
The reinforcement was mostly complete. It generally looked good.
E:
Two laborers were working on installing dowels for the crane rail corbel. The corbel
0,
reinforcement consisted of threaded dowels and couplings. After shotcreting, dowels will be
threaded into the couplings for the portion of the rebar outside the face ofthe wall. Steve said
M M
they would provide a roughened and keyed area at the corbel construction joint. This approach is
M
0
approved.
I told Steve that for the top hooked bars to be effective, they needed to be set within the top 1/2 of
the roof slab. They are currently variable in location. He said he would be checking this.
I asked that the diagonal bars at pipe penetrations be provided with some clear between the bar
and pipe. They are currently in contact with the pipes.
z
I also told Steve that the bottom construction joint needed to be cleaned up, especially the north
CO
z
comers where soil had fallen into the hole. Steve said this would be done, and the crew was
working on this cleanup while I was on -site.
0
m
I asked Steve about the plan for curing the shotcrete. The exact method was not yet determined,
but he said they would be moist curing the surface. Curing compound would not be applied to
avoid issues with the painted coating.
- - I UY1415
U I Lynnwood, WA 98036
101,115-774-0106
200 -094
1 of2
Ropon No.
0.1.
HWAGEOSCIENCESINC, Fax 425-774-2714
4
June 4, 2002
LooalionorAdd—
D" —wooV
Lift Station No. 1 Renovation (ElGA)
Edmonds. Was,.
Tuesday
Fo(MI
Wth.' TO.P. M
ZZI ofEdmonds
Mostly Cloudy / 55F
Clio;
CHoni R.I.
HWAPM�GCAEAOInft'
Ci ofEdmonds
Pamela Lemcke
Richard McKinley J
_FWd
c 0"� "*
4WA R.I.
�onstruction
S`,`cve`;..dy
Pat Pierce
z
WE NOTED THE FOLLOWING: (Contractor Activities, HWA Activities, Outstanding issues, and Resolutions)
Arrived:0900 Departed: 1000
Pat Pierce on site at the request ofParn Lemcke to provide observation and testing oftrench backfill during the
am,
installation ofnew 12-inch ductile iron force main along Sunset Avenue.
m 0
At the time ofthis visit, the contractor had removed about 12 inches ofpreviously placed backfill and replaced it
M m
with about 9 inches of 5/8 inch minus crushed surfacing top course (CSTC) from Edmonds St., north about 600
feet. No testing of the CSTC was performed at this time since a visual assessment indicated that the CSTC was
C
too dry for proper compaction. The contractor indicated he would bring a portable water tank on site and water
the surface prior to compaction, A follow-up visit to check the CSTC compaction was scheduled for later today.
0 -n
n
-4
One density test was performed on a section ofthe trench that was prepared to have CSTC placed on it. The
contractor compacted the disturbed surface ofthe native backfill with a small walk -behind roller. This test
m m
indicates compact ion in this area at 95% ofmodified proctor. The results were reported to the contractor and
0
0 Fn
are summarized on page 2.
C 0
mo
z
z
0
m
Signed:
Reviewed: z'2--.,- :;zq-
FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT - NUCLEAR METHOD
ASTM D 2922 and ASTM D 3017 (.U), ASTM D 20dO (-ph.IQ
HWAGEOSCIENCES U14C.
CLIENT: City of Edmonds PROJECT NO.: 20D2094 DATE: 6/4/2002
PROJECT: Lift Station No. I Renovation (EiGA) MATERIAL BEING PLACED: Native
PROJECT IMPROVEMENT TESTED: Force main trench backfili - CSTC and cut native trench barktill
Test
No.
Detailed Test Location
Elev.
or
Depth
(it)
P be
C:pth
(in)
Ova']
'i"
(Rock
(%1
Lab
Control,
Field
Values
Relative
C ompactio
Spec
%
.1
I
Sta. 3+00 (in front of 354 Sunset Ave)
-1 ft
8 in
0
84
126.3
131.7
119.5
96
95
11.8
12.2
10.2
Densometer Tmx1sr34II-8 Dens. Sind.: 213
MCPN mct-oft-p Motw — serial N: i8ru 7 MOM. SW: 706
COWENTS: Statim numbers we approhmate, SIG Subgrade
'SON Control: E3ASTM DeW, Standard Proctor MXASTM D iS57. Modified Pfocla
'Aspiraft control MASTM 2041AIVSDOT 705, WX� Theor. Density (Rioe) EIASTM DIM, Marshall Density
Completed By: Pat Pierce Reviewed By: 4z-- --7 — Z-:42e Page 2 of 2
ThIs report vWlez wtj ba Ow 0— Wsted. and may be tapmdamd in We. Wth writion approval d K4 GEOSCIENCES NO/
Lynnwoo d WA9 803 6
JobNo.
2002-094
ftgoN.,
1 of 2
INC. Tel, 125-774-0106
HWAGEOSCIENCES Fax. 425-774-2714
rp.d No.
Dole
5
June4,2002
Pm'.Cl No—
L.M.—I Add
03Y.1 ft Wftk
Lift Station No. I Renovation (EIGA)
Edmonds, Washington
Tuesday
O.Ae'
City of Edmonds
pemil No,
—.1her Temp. (F)
Slunny 65F
clieffl
Ch..1 R.P.
HWA Pr.;Mt R�ai�r
City of Edmonds
Pamela Lemcke
Richard McKird ey
C.111AC10
Hisey'Construction
R.P.
Steve Reedy
M ^ "' -1,
John H. (Jack-) Carlock-
0
WE NOTEO THE FOLLOWING: (Contractor Activities, HWA Activities, Outstanding Issues, and Resolutions)
Arrived: 15:40 Departed. 16:30
-'fi
ra v
At the request of Pam Lemcke, Jack Carlock (with Richard McKinley) was on site for a follow -up visit to
0 In !A;
perform compaction testing of Crushed Surfacing Top Course along Sunset Avenue.
m 0
0
At the time of this visit, about 9 inches of 5/8 inch minus crushed s urfacing top course (CSTC) had been placed
C,
M
from Edmonds St., north about 600 feet along Sunset Avenue. Earlier today, a visual assessment by HWA
indicated that the CSTC was too dry for proper compaction and no testin.g of the material was performed. This
C —
> Z i��
asscssmont was reported to the contniLtor, who then indicated that he would add water to the material, and then
E: v
continue his compaction efforts there.
U5
0
"n
A visual assessincrit showed that the material had been hydrated prior to the visit but that the surface of the
M M
material rolled or shifted under foot suggesting a poor degree of compaction. HWA preformed a series for four
0 Vi
Nuclear Field Density Tests and found that the material did not meet a densi ty of 95% of Modified Proctor
0
0 Fn
(ASTM D 1557). The results were reported to the contractor at the time and he agreed to continue with the
C (n,
C CD
compaction efforts as necessary. Test values and locations are summarized on page 2.
mo�
z
co
z
0
In
Signe-d:
Reviewed:
FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT - NUCLEAR METHOD
ir ","I
ASTMO 2M -d ASTIVID 30,17 (,.Ilt,ASTMt) ZM (.p].N)
IWAGEOSCIENCES INC
CLIENT: City of Edmonds
PROJECT NO.: 2002094
DATE: 6/4/2002
PROJECT: I-Ift Station No. I Renovation (El GA)
MATERIAL BEING PLACED: CSTC
PROJECT IMPROVEMENT TESTED: Force main trench backfill- CSTC placement
Elev.
Over-
Lob
Field
I
Relative
Test
Detailed Test Location
Prob
Size
Control'
Values
Compaction
No.
Dor
epth
Depth
(Rock
Sample
Densit cf
Wet Dens (Dcn
I
Dry Dens (pcQ
Field
"P,-
(III
(in)
(%I
I.D.
Moisture%
Moisture (pcf)
I
Moisture%
%
I
Sta. 10+00 (Neat N.W. comer of Sunset Ave and Edmond Street)
- 4"
Sin
0
127.1)
123.9
119.5
94
95
QA
4.4
3.6
C
2
Sta. 8+20 (320 Sunset Ave)
-W'
Sin
0
S-6
121.2
117.1
—
92
95
9.1
4.1
3.5
3
Sta. 6+50 (336 Sunset Ave)
-4'
8 in
D
S-6
127.0
122.9
93
95
9.1
4.4
4
Sta. 6+50 (336 Sunset Ave)
-4"
Sin
0
1 S�6
127.0
—
119.4
115.1
91
95
9.1
4.3
3.7
O.risomeler: MR TroIder 3411-8 MCPNMCi-OR-P F�Other
Srial X: 122W Dam, Sind.:
2U9 Moist. Sind: 629
Sdl Corri FlASTM D698, Standaul Pro&&
nXASTM D 1567. M.&Wd Fred.,
COMMENTS: Station numbers am appro*nate, SIG Subiinide
-Asphslt Central nASTM 204iAVSDOT 705, Max. Thsor. Density (Rice)
F-JASTM 131559, Mmshall Density
Completed By: Jack Carlock
Reviewed By: zz�
Page 2 of 2
TW—W Wpil..*IotM V-6Wd, M ..y b—q,.d..d h W..fth-Mm.pproyald kwAGEOMENIMS INC. R.Wd 7/01
CiAND
03.9(3)
C
RAVEL
Percp S ci fion
ICOBSLESI
Coe I Fine 1 uoarre Me-dium Fine
Sieve Size
Passin Limits
U,s. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES
8 Inch
w 39r, 04 Co 020 440 0130 #100 02?0
Inch
100
5 ch
4 Inch
go
3 Inch
2 1/2 Inch
So
it
I
2 inch
11/2 inch
C) To
I
1
11/4 Inch
I n coh
314 Inch
logo%
518 Inch
w so
1/2 Inch
S 90-100%
z
318 Inch
LL
40
1/4 Inch
1JU
No. a
3D
w
CL
No I
20
No. 20
10
8-24%
No. 50
0
100
5
10 oJ
0.60
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
No. 80
No. 100
A%
.. .. .. .. ..... .
I
Ut
SoUnd P.I.
FMC(UrO
MA,IERIAL CL#,ssjFtCA�l ION I DESCRIPnON
1 S-2 1 YMM21
cnahed Gurlacin;i Top Coume (CSTC)
SIEVE ANALYSIS OF
CAty of Edmonds
SOIL I AGGREGATE
Aggregates- ASTM Cl 36
BUT,
Lift station No. i Renovations
soils,-ASTM D422
RMIGMSIME NaSINC Quality Assurance Testing
PRoxcrmo,t 2002-094-23 mu—
awm
I GRAVEL SAND
COBBLES 1----c-o
��erre �Fine coarse I Medium____
i7l
10D
90
so
r
70
w
ftf
w 50
30
w
0-
20
10
01
DATE
PLED
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
Sieve
8 In(
7 Inc
6 In
5 Inc
-4 In(
3 im
2112
2 In
11/2
P i In
' I I
3/41
5 51 1
181
8
1
1/21
3/8
8
1/4
'n
No
No
No
No
No
Nc
Nc
N"
Ni
N,
SAMZD FROM
MokTERIAL CLASSIFfGAMON I DESCRIPTiON
Mn
Irm Mountin ChNny, by HWA
Cfmhd Sud&dna T-P COU— (WeM)
1.0
SIEVE ANALYSIS OF
City of Edmonds SOIL / AGGREGATE
Lift Station No. I Renovations Aggregates- ASTIVI C1 36
ffi%GWSGENCES1NC Quality Assurance Testing Soils-ASTM D422
PROJECTNo, 2002-094-23 F1rURr' -I
SKEDW
AASIC W0M"PJ WM
�A
.......... -------
LABORATORY COMPACTION CHARACTERISTIC$ OF SOIL ffr
(ASTM D SM. ASTIA D 1557, AM D 4716) U
CLIENT: CifyofEdmonds_ MAGEOSCIENCES INC
PROJECT: Lift Station No. I Renovations SAMPLE ID: S-3
PROJECT NO: 2002-094-23 — Sampled By: HWA-IJHC Tested By: E.B.
Date Sampled: &31102 Date Received: &31/02 Date Tested: &31/02
MATERIAL TYPE OR DESCRIPTION: Bank Run Gravel for Trench Backfill
SAMPLE LOCATION AND DEPTH: Iron Mountain Quarry, Sampled by supplier
Standard: ODS98 MX D1557 Natural Moisture Content: 4.6 %
Method: MA MB MR C Oversize 20.3 % retainedon: 314 1 n.
Preparation: E]Dry F RammerE]Auto, E]Manual Assumed &G.: 2.6s
_]Moist
Test Data
Dry Density (pcf) 1 128.7 1 131.1 129.9 1 126.7
IM0lStur8.CoT)te.nt(%) 1 4.6 1 5.4 � 11 7.6 1 B.9 I
145
140
mmmmmmmscmmmmm�mm IMMMMMMMMMM
ommmoon WW==WMWWWW somolommoon
manolmmmmommal- Mom mmo�no.om
W 21111111111
11111111111CINIZEM 202
womommoomm ammimmommmm
------------- 0 ------
W=M===
I
Data Summ
OtherOversize Percentage$
Percent Oversize
20.1
0.0%
1 5.0%
110.0%
1 15.0% 1
20.0%125.0%130.0%-
Max. Dry Density (pef)
138.3
132.a
1 134.1
135.5
1 136.
138.3
1 139.7
1 141.2
Optimum Moisture (%)
5.1
6.17—
5.1
1 4.8
1 4.6
Reviewed By: FIGURE I
TtOs r*W.W� o*jaft i%M t"ad, SrA My be n4vodwad hi full.a,.n"" QPPZ;W;;G 7 EoscV4ES Vc,
It
It
LABORATORY COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL
(ASTM 0 60, ASTM 0 1557, MW D 4718)
CLIENT* City of Edmonds HWAGEoSciwaslNc
PROJECT: Lift Station No. 1 Renovations SAMPLE ID: S-6
PROJECT NO: 2002-094-23 Sampled By: HWAIJHC Tested By: E.B.
Date Sampled: 5a112002 Date Received: 5/31/2002 Date Tested: 61412002
�FMAJERIAL PE OR DESCRIPTION: gray, Crushed Surfacing Top Course
SAMPLE LOCATION AND DEPTH: Moo Mountain Quarry
Standard: r--JD698 [ED1557 Natural Moisture Content: 1.8 %
Method: [-]A C]B MR C Oversize: 0 % retained on: 3/4 In.
Preparation: [XjDry E]Moist Rammer.[X]Auto [-]Manual Assumed S.G.: 2.7
121.0 124.0 125.9
5.1 1 10.5 1 13.1
Datasummal --I
Percent Ove rsize 1 0.0%
MaX. Dry Danilty (Ii-C41-j-27.0
OptIrnuMM0I*tUr8(%)j 91 1
other Oversize Percentages
0.0%
5. 0.
1 5.0%
1 Lto%
20.0%
25.0%
30..%
W--T
0
12-8.6
100-2
�5 10.%
11 —9
! 133.6
135.3
137.1
.7
8.3
7.9
1 7.5
7.1
6.7
Reviewed By: 1-2, FIGURE I
Thk "wt wp#o o* b Ow 1W.. %". WA ftW k. Ipd..d 1. (.11. je;�M.. w.1 WMA WOWENCSS INC.
FEB- 13-02 lBzO3 FROM:HWA GEOSCIENCES INL
HWAGEoScaNCES INC
19730-64th AVE W STE 200
Lynnwoocl, WA 99036-5904 El,�
FAV-AIITTAL Tet 425-774-0106
Fax. 425-774-2714
Date: February 13,2002
To: City of Edmonds
Attention: Pam Lemke Z�
0�
Fax No.: 425 771-0221 0
M
ction Services ChouP
Flom: Richard McKinley, Manager, Materials and COnsbv
0)
ProjectNo.:. 2000 189
Off
m 0,
Total number of pages including cover sheet: �Xpages -40.
c: 06
Subject. Welding Inspection m
10
C
d American
cbed is Tony's resume and a copy of his newly xenewe
Pam: Atta p,"
Welding Society cerfifcate. Please feel free to call me should you have any 0 _n
-n
comments or questions.
e e 14 rn M.
V5
0
0
Regards, C
Richard McKinley mo
z
NAL' ------
Z'
4
z
90
m
�,d b.v.. IfY-- Y-08- thi- r" in ym
18 71, imfermulien in thie f" ene—RE i� confidential and internled ody for the u" d the xetiPler5
w,nW% OftWs cr,,,,uOlcwjonis strictly piobibilod. 1fYOUTcc&ivtth6`ne$"V in war-
pl_. ntrify us by tWcph-.- iturnedinlelY -d noxn th. Iigifl ..,.p re, ra the Oe�. ft-S$ Vi- the U-S. PostAl S&-ViOO'
Geotechnical Engineering
Hydregeolow
Geoenvirontnental Services i
Testing ra inspection i
0) L litV
PS
Anwrican We6ring Socwty
Certifies that Werding inspector
Tony M Martin
has COMPI& with the requirernents of SwHon 6.1
of the AWS Standardfor Qualfiwtion and
0
Cert�f=twn of We[ding inspectors QCt-36 C.
- 14
CRITIFICAlf NU.BEQ
November 2001 CKNQMAN QUALF(CAT(ON -OOMMnTEE
VALID DATE,
DAPLOYM. PETER TO WAILET CARD K)R
VAUDfry AND EMRATK)N DATE
APON COMM[ME !=Vl
W/
1* 119 1 � A lq S,y
MOD
HWAGEOSCUNCES INC
TONY M. MARTIN
SENIOR INSPECTORIFIELD SUPERVISOR
EDUCATION
Mr. Tony Martin has 20 years of expe6once in the construction industry as a
construction inspector. Mr. Marlin has performed quality control inspection
A.A.. orange Coast College, 1974
and materials testing services during the construction of buildings, roadways,
land fills,
dams, coal fired generated power plans, nuclear power plant ,
z
PROFESSIOK41 REGISTRAVONS
ones
sewer and water lines, pump stations, airports, fish hatch , and transit
facilities. Mr. Martin is AWS certified in welding, ACI and ICBO cartified in
Licensed 14miew Demometer
concrete. and NICET cortified in soils, concrete, and asphalt. Mr. Martin is
0
thoroughly acquainted With the inspection methods and material testing
and earth fills and
ICBO Reinfoited Concrete
programs required during construction of steel structures
Special Inspector
during the placement of asphalt concrete and reinforced concrete. Mr. Martin
;I
Amedcan Concrete Instrute Certified
also has extensive oVerionce parformling laboratory tests on soil, concrete,
Fill,
C:
Field Testing Technician. Grace I
asphalt, and steel. In addition to his ccristruction industry experience, Mr.
r, z
Amorican Welding Society
Certified Welding Inspector
Martin has 10 years of experience in the aemspace industry as a Quality
Mr.
-4 C)
0
NICET Card ficalion, for ftil,
Assurance Inspector and Manager. As a Quality Assurance Manager,
:0
Marlin administered a quality assurance program, verified that tabrIcated
M
kz-
Concrete. and Asphalt
products met contract and code requirements, and managed and supervised
up to 25 employees.
Z
lo
u)
0 -n;
"n
'MM
0
6
>
z
-4
X
Z:
M
IS 01
HWAGEOSCIENCIES INC
Woodinville Valley Trail, Woodinville, Washington. Providedconshiction monitating and testing services during
construction of the Woodinville Valley Trail. This pr7clact Involved the construction of a paved pecilsstrian/bike path and a
single span reinforced concrete bridge over the Sammamish River. Servicas provided included sampling and testing
concrete dudng construction of the Nidge abutments and dock, moniloring the placement and periodically testing the
compactlon of structural fill matadals� base course, and asphalt concrete materials
South Fork Taft Dam intake Tower Seismic Upgrade, King County, Washington. Provided construction monitonng
and testing services during constructIon of ft second largest post -tensioning project ever undertaken, This proled
included installing six vertical anchors to a depth of 275 feet below the intake tower surface. These anchors were
embedded ova( 90 feet into" underlying andazits bedcck, Each anchor was stressed to a load of 1,100 tons.
Responsibilities Included monitoring the pilot and tendon hole drilling, documenting construclion activities on a daily basis,
and monitoring turbidly motors to ensure water quality.
D.O.C. Dairy Waste Lagoon, Reformatory Farm No. 2, Monroe, Washington. Provided construction monitoring
services during construction of a dairy waste lagoon at the Washington State Department of Corrections! Reformatory
Farm No. 2 in Monroe, Washington, The project consisted of constructing a new, approximately 19 million gallon (MG)
dairy waste storage lagoon immediately south of an "sting 6 MG waste lagoon. Excavated on-sita sails were used to
construct the lagoon embankments, which ranged from about 10 to 15 feet In height Services provided Included
documenting construction activities and monitoring the placement of embankment fill materials.
1997 Water Main Replacement Program, Edmonds, Washington. Provided construction observation and testing
services during the installation of approximately 6,100 lineal feet of 8-inch diameter dudle Iran pipa and appurtenance&
Services provided included monitoring and periodically testing the compaction of trench backfill materials, documenting
construction activities,
Market Str-t Water Line, Kirkland, Washington. Provided construction observation and testing services during the
replacement of approximately 7,000 lineal iset of water line in Kirkland, Washington. The new water line was 10 to 12
inches in diameter, Services provided Included monitoring and periodically testing the compaction at trench backfill, base
course, and asphaltic concrete materials.
SR 99 Water Main Improvement Projeol, Lynnwood, Washington. Provided construction observation and testing
services during the installation of approximately 5,200 lineal feet of 12-inch water main and 325 lineal feet of 18-inch
diameter water main and appurtenances. Services provided included monitoring and periodically testing the compaction of
"rich backfill, base course, and asphaltic roncrate materials.
76-, Avenue West Sewer, Snohomish County, Washington. Providedconstruction observation and testing services
dudng the replacement of a 244nch diameter concrete sewer that was partially pile supported. Services provided included
monitoring and periodically toating the compacton of trench backlill materials, and documenting construction a&AIJes.
Tulalip Landfill Closure, Marysville, Washington. Provided construction observation and testing services during
installation of the landfill cover system for the Tulalip Landfill Supedund site. This project involves the Installation of an
engineered, low-permsobility, cover system over a 147-acre landfill. Responsibilities included documenting construction
activities on a daily basis, monitoring the deployment of geosynthatics materials, monitoring the placement and testing the
compaction at stuctural fill materIals, periodically collecting representative samples of processed materials for laboratory
testing, and tracking compliance of the construction requirements per the projects technical spoeification.
Edmonds Public Safety Complex, Edmonds, Washington. Pmvided construction monitoring and testing sanAces
during construction of the Edmonds PubJic Safety Complex. TKis project involved the construction of a now fire station and
a new bulking to,hou&a the police department and municipal court functions. The now throa-bay tire station consists of a
singio-story s"ure with a small second-stofy mamnimB. The now Olco/court building consists of a two-story wing that
houses the police department and a single -story wing that houses the municipal court chambers and associated offices
and services. Services provided Included monitoring the placement and Periodically testing the compaction of structural rill
materials and sampling and testing concrete during placement
z
0
C M
M a
0
80
C
M M
z
0
,n
m M
0
0
C
M 0
z
z
V)
z
0
=j
0
M
UM
HWAGfOSCIENCES INC
Beverly Park Road Improvements, Mukilteo, Washington. provided construction observation and testing services
audrig the widening of Beverly Park Road from two to five lanes. Resfoonsibilibas included monitoring the preloarallon of
the roadway subgrade. documenting construction activities, and periodically testing the compaction of structural fill, base
course, and asphaltic concrete materials.
Holly Parit Fedevelopment - Phase 1, Seattle, Washington. Provided construction observation and testing services
during Phase I of the Hoily Park Redevelopment project, which included the demolition of about 414 housing units and the
construction of 480 units of two—tory, ood-framod cingle homes, two-story duplex units, and townhomes. The project
also included constructing a n6hvork of new streels and utilities throughout the 47-acro site. Services provided included
density feeling during placement of structural fills, documenting construction activities on a daily basis, and tracking
compliance of the construction reWiromants per the projects lochnitcal specification.
Green Lake Trail, Seattle, Washington. Provided construction observation and testing services during the reconstruction
of the 2.6 miles of existing paved trail that encircles Green Lake, This project included constructing a now, wider paved
trail and adjacent crushed granits, surfaced trail. Services provided included observing preparation and shibilizatton of
subgraclas for the proposed new trail section, documenting construction activities, and tracking compliance of the
construction requirements per the project's technical specification,
Lynnwood Ubtary Expansion, Lynnwood, Washington. Provided construction monitoring and testing services during
expansion of the Lynnwood Library. The project involved adding approximately 11,500 square foot to the altisting City
Library, constructing a now ontryway, updating the storm drainage system, and constructing additional parking areas.
Services provided included monitoring and perioclically testing the compaction of structural fill, trench backfill, bass course,
and asphaltic concrete materials, and performing testing and inspections related to cast -in -place reinforced concrete and
welded structural connections.
Metro Van Distribution Center, Redmond, Washington. Provided construction observation and testing services during
the construction of a permanent facility to( storage and distribution of up to 500 Metro vans. Services provided included
density tes6ng during placement of structural fills, documenting construction advities on a daily basis, and tracking
compliance of the construction requirements per the project's technical specification.
Green Hill School Roadway Improvements, Chehalis, Washington. Provided construction observation and testing
services during the construction of roadway improvements that included soft subgrade conditions and an at -grade railroad
crossing, Responsibilities included monitoring ft preparation and stabilization of the roadway subgrade and periodically
testing the compaction of structural fill, base course, and asphaltic concrete material$.
Puyallup Wastewater Treatment Facility, Puyallup, Washington. Provided construction observation services during
expansion a wastewater treatment facility. The project included constructing an aeration basin structure, two secondary
clarifiers, a secondary splitter box, a blower building, and an aBraflon basin pump station. Services provided included
documenting construction activities on a daily basis, monitoring the excavation and placement of compacted crushed rock
for the below -grade structures, periodically collecting representative samples of imported materials for laboratory testing,
and monitoring the eflectivenem of the derviratering system.
African American Acadamy. Provided construction observation services during the oonstruiction of the African American
Academy (school). Services proMed Included documentintgi construction activities on a daily basis, monitoring the
excavation and placement of compacted soils/crushed rock for all structures.
TM.MST.1 00
z
0
:1
0
M
C M
M
0
0
C
M M
z
4
0
M M
0 rn
0
o Fit
C ca
M 0
Z r
--I . I -,
ca
z
0
M
FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM
TO:
DATE:
MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION
FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE —
ENGINEERING D ]VISION DATE*—/f
z
I
---------YLANNING DIVISION DATE—
0
PROJECT
=i —n
Vi
M
srrEADDREss
M 0
-4 0
0
ADB _-------PATE INSPECTED—ZQ=- �—
PERMIT #
M
'o
r
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED MEL r
ToNe-,,%INT, �VAe--
At5P*lAV
65
A field inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval
0 -n
denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of
PERFORNL4NCE BONDS and the granting of
M M
0
0 M
GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
C (4
9(o
M 0
>
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
z
a Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector
co
1. aMpLVIV7 AW FVt--Wl- WNeM I-IST rrgEil.4S -rV CWNIEMS
z
FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES
a Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector
I
2.
3.
RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date Sign_
ocaprvl.doc.l:tetW:bldg:foffmIO/OI
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR
DATE APPROVED
SETBACKS .....................
FOUNDATION:
Footing .. ....................
wall .................
Pier/Porch ..........
Retaining Wall ...........
Slab Insulation
PLUMBING:
Underground .............
Rough -in ...................
Commercial Final
HEATING:
Gas Test ....................
Gas Piping ...........
Equipment .................
Commercial Final
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
NAILING ... ....................
FRAMING ........................
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING...
INSULATION ...................
Floor Insulation
Wall Insulation
Ceiling Insulation
SHEETROCK NAILING
SPECIAL INSPECTION
MISCELLANEOUS
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY ...............
z
0
M
C
ITI
0
80
C
MT
M ITI
0
0
0
C
C
IT
z
z
z