Loading...
20020385.pdfDATE RECEIVED PWA PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS us, ZONE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB 'T'17T 'ER BUSINESS ADDRESS fiMeg!� ZT 1-1 A 71) 7— PLAT NAMEISUBDIVISION NO. 1�1) NO, 0 FEE S PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP ZIP TELEPHONE 11214 A 4 fa EXISTING — PROPOSED In REQUIRED DEDICATION_ FT — Un F.- E METER SIZE LINE SIZE PRV REOUIIED' I l';j, YE� N o 13 'APR REMARKS OWNERICONTRACHOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROWORAINAGE ZIP TELEPHONE T 241JII�� n ENGINEERING -IIJ14 CITY Z� T'E'LEPHON' FIRE REVIEWED BY S :aI77-��X� �y , L z1V - .3,:Xl - &/34/ STATE LICENSE NUMBER FXPIRkTK RJANCF OR CU NEW RESIDENTIAL "Bi PLUMBING / MECH 1 LOT COVEACH ALLOWED PROP, /"�_ADDITION COMMERCIAL 0 MPLIANCE OR 0 OHANGE OF USE 'P') REMODEL APARTMENT 0 SIGN PARKING IDE FENCE REPAIR C1-S X FIT DEMOLISH 0 TANK 0 OTHER .-ININ. WAL, 4GARAGE CARPORT _ U ROCKERY RENEWAL OF USE. USINESS OR niffy) EXPLAIN: CHECKED By Tyr NUMBER a -OF CRITICAL OF STORIES DWELL NG UNITS, AREAS NUMBER SP DIAL INSPECTO REQUIRED 0 YES DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE DATE SHORF,LINE OR ADS# INSPECTION D Re o I PIO OSTEC DYES ONO SION AHEA HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED P7,07 , Q , i HIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS JFT� FROM SIDE REAR FRONT LT�10� BEAR AREA I PI,ANNING REVIEWED BY DATE .... INT<IC LOAD 14) 'Z ER UBC 11081FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D ��'rv) 21 VALUATION $ /C/6 1 IKK) lu it z2i Descriptlon FEE Description, FEE C Plan Check 13 ZIC 0 0 LOT "'P E --- Building /671,1 &,s--e k _ SITED DATE Plumbing 11150 THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOT G), THIS PERMITCOVERS WORK To Mechanical BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY, ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN SIDEWALKS, Grading ')`0 M (CURBS. DRIVEWAY$. MARQUEES, ETC,) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. Engr. Review I j Recording Fee City Surcharge FIC'MITAPPLICATION: INDAYS PERMIT UMM I YEAR - PROVI E 2RD WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180DAYS SCSSACKOFPINKP MIT FOR MORE INFORMATION Engr.insp ion 6Ct State Surcharge —PL-NT. ON BEHALF 01 HIS On HER SPOUSE. HEIRS. -SIGNS A No .... I.... Traffic Mitigation Plan Chk Deposit IN INTEREST AGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND I ALL CLAJMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY Fire Review Receipt # 9 FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS P RMIT SHALL NOT HE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REOUIREMENT OF A CITY ORDINANCE Fire Inspection Total Amount Due 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CIT�S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINNYANCE PRONISION.- Landscapainsp.1 Receipt # I HERESY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT .1 APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER IAGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC. TION; AND IN GOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL This nPinficatiOl is rnt a Pshnift Unfli 119"d by ush IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO 8.4ding Offidsi ., Issih., D.puny� nd Fss. .. p.ld FOR INSPECTION —1pt Is in WORKMENSS�N�ATIQN INSURRANICE No RCW UIL271 ack—led9od spshe Pholldad� 'r -- R (0& on I V (425) OFF1 IIIIATURE DATE �ATIZNED/ Sig \�',111 771-0220 ATTENTION RELaIS By EXT 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- 771-0221 CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTEO UBC SECTION 109 10101 FAX PINK,OWNER - GOLD�ASSSSSOR z 0 C 171 M 0 0 80 a M M 0 In rn ITI 0 0 0 9 (D M 0 Z 71 C" z DATUMT P 0 1 N11 0 rx. (111,01, 191-108, �ci C. 191-1.38, OZ om a M 8 OL Idl 1. m 'ate 0 fall A. 19 L ,AV. B tl 99.50, m M 0 OC co APPROVED BY PLANNING, z 10 Iii, 'F- !SP"IT44, I pigy jee oA o -vJ wuaup 7 it J Gil ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT CONSULIANIS Mr. Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Program Manager May 17, 2002 City of Edmonds Community Services Department LSA No. 4328 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Smith Residence— 9505 216" Street SW Z� Waiver request- Maximum driveway slope. 0, Plan Check #02-184 0 Dear Mr. Chrisman: This letter is a request for a waiver to the City's maximum driveway slope restrictions. Mr. and Mrs. Kent Smith are proposing to relocate their current driveway from the east side of -40 their house to the west side as part of a remodel/addition to their residence. Their 0 C: residence is located within the City of Edmonds at 9505 2161h Street SW -4 K X M . 1, , M The natural topography of the site slopes to the back of their lot, about 8 feet from the front c: — Z to the back. The existing driveway (to be removed) is approximately 20% for a distance of about of 20 feet. The Smiths propose to reconstruct the driveway along the west side of their house at a slope of 15%. The design of 15% provides an economical and 0," environmentally reasonable alternative to fit the current topography of the site, with respect to the existing house location. (It reduces the amount of required excavation and height MM 5j, and length of retaining wall/rockeries). 0 5 Fn The proposed driveway of 15% will have no adverse impactto public health, safety and/or general welfare. Therefore, on behalf of our client, we are requesting a waiver to authorize C 0 0, a maximum driveway slope up to 15%, by City Code 18.80.060 (D). X, Thank you for taking the time to review this matter. Please call me if you need additional information or have any questions. Z 9 Sincerely, 0 M ajo i!� V KD MAY 17 2,092 Robert L. Long, PE 06 rs Lovell-SULIefland & Associates, Inc. 19400 33rd Me. W., Suite 200. Lyntumd, WA 98036 800-77S-7663 125-775-1591 425,672-7998 lux Height Calculation Worksheet Address: Date: e")U- �'z Inspector(s): 1. Datum Point: Q_ 2. Datum Point Elevation: 0 - 3. Averag Re Grade: M,: 4. Maximum Elevation Allowed: �I'haverage grade) + 25' M C MCI 0 5. Reference Point Elevation Shot to House: K C, —(datum elevation) +4, S (grade to transit,level line shot to house)= 0 M M� 6. Measurements from line shot onto house to roof ridge: z 4n C�, ku mm, 0 0 C M 0' z Total: OY z 0 M 7. Actual Elevation: (reference point elevation) +Pd-!?T (measurements from #6) (actual) is greater 6e—,s th,�i 1�Z2d'3- 5 allowed); therefore the house is/ is not over the height requiremenT "Per ECDC 16.20.30 requirements LATEWXBUILDINGWISOHeight Calculation Worksheet.doc FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM TO:— DATE: — MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION FROM: FIRE DEPARTNENT DATE — ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE_4U�I_i_ PLANNING DIVISION DATE— z 6 PROM 0 C M srrE ADDRESS- M C, ADB# INSPECT --10 00 C -4 C = M DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED f�Mi_ M z A field inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Depa rtment to the release of 0 n P RMANCE BONDS and the granting of: M M GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL 0 -M C W Q 0 Z r- GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WnH CONDITIONS NOTED > z 0 Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractorby inspector ch z 0 FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES, q 0 M a Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector JAN 1 2003 PERMIT COUIVTEI, 2. 3. RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL Date— Sign_ ocaprvi.doc.l:temp:bldg:fonnsIO/OI RECORD OF INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED Ms �v SETBACKS ..................... FOUNDATION: o Z- V�" Footing ..................... wall .......... Pier/Porch ................. Retaining Wall Slab Insulation .......... PLUMBING: Underground ............. Rough -in ................... yvf. flf`i�i 6Z Commercial Final .......... HEATING: Gas Test .................... -Til-atz Gas Piping —'7 Equipment ................. Commercial Final EXTERIOR SHEATHING NAILING .................. r I FRAMING .................. FIRST FLOOR FRAMING INSULATION ............. Floor Insulation Wall Insulation Ceiling Insulation 6Z SHEETROCK NAILING SPECIAL INSPECTION MISCELLANEOUS FINAL APPROVAL FOR OCCUPANCY .............. Ql? 1 '7� SIdeSewet#_ AmoutPWd$ 3.-2_Rce1pt#_!&d— fres Waterp4et&Sizze AA:!: Receipt #_ AmountWId- .0 DntePum%=Cd gold-- I/ I .01v Amount P--.d —neempt V z 0 am MO 0 80 r_ _11 x IT, m z 10-1 2 03 Im m 0 0 09 C rj) C (j) . M C) zr- :)D z z 0 :j 0 m