20020586A.pdfEIVED
DATE REC ::I�
PERMIT EXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
US, PERM T
/,?S NUMEER,�PJW, -Z
JOB SUITEIAPTO
ADDRESS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OW E'
Rj&yRZN` . SH_ty4a-. :i4a�-_
NAM1111 I BDIVI ; �IOPN NO
PLAT NAVEISUBDIVISION NO
PLA
LOT NO,
LID NO.
LID FEE S
'N
L
MAILING ADDRESS
�l
PUBLIC RIGHT, VAY PER OFFICJA��ET MAP
C T W Y Er.
PU.7�
?v
UV. 1-
T 1.11
TELEPHONE
NO j
EXISTING - FRUAE.
B
__ _ _ _ ,
PMA
J�� cNo -,,c
-, p
_?`Z�o_ 1;�q
___ ___ FT
DIFIG OCDICATIO ,
B'D N
N N AME
El ID S I
LINESIZE
NO�OIIIXTURES
P 'F.U."Fl-
Al.
R lAFXl
OWNERICONTPACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CON' LJORAINAGE
k� E):(Dle�oclat�
C C Ty
ITY ZIP..
TELEPHON)
FIRE REVIEWED By AIE
ZIP
TELEPHONE
20tIT
VAPIAJ�:R CU
SHOI`Ek�� ADS#
INSPECTION
RE
Cl YES%NO
I SON"
POSTED
T
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION D ;-
SERA REVIEW
C."IL111 I EXEMPT
up
SIGN AREA
ALL ED PROPOSED
KCIGHT
ALLOWS
PROP P
_00
g2E; RESIDS.T.L PLU..'N- I MECH
ADDITION C] COMMERCIAL C PLIANCEOR
CHANGE OF USE
0 REMODEL C] APARTMENT 0 SIGN
ENCE
REPAIR CYDS 0 F X FT)
I IT COVEPA)4
ALLOWED PROPOSED
LARED SETBACKS (Fl`.�
FRONT SIDE REAR
-7 P '7 .
PROPOSED SETBACKS HFT,)
FRONT UP SIDE REZ
A.
�
PA
RED ,
2.
ING
PROV
1 �_ 4
.. ....... DATE
REVIEWED BY
Q.- �b, -
REMARKS
DEMOLISH TANK c3 OTHER
Z KGARAGE M RETAINING WALL RENEWAL
CARPORT ROOKERY 0
0
r E OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
A.
L3
r--;- szVell 4 / - k
1 4 V "if- 1�
CHECKEDBY
ITYPE!=TION
GROUP e
C�n 0 CUPANT
je
NUMBER
OF
STORIES
NUMBEROF
0 1
UWELUNG
NITS
CRITICAL
AREAIB.
NUBI. qq�
S IIIAL INSPECTOR JAREj5t�
REQUIREI [] YES
OCAC(UPANT
Lo
OR BE WORK TO BE DONE
MMikZ_ $Mf
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER U.0 108TINAL INSPECTION REQ'D
Aj,w2c mow
Y, 6 7 - -
A�vvlz_ C120
47-1 1 4r,/7 e
s, r
VALUATION
FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
PU
E-
LO SLOPE I
..II.IN.
".IN.
E-LOR
41ES�F._L-
rlANCA
NO: YES
. RING
PLUMBING
PL
PLAN CHECK
Of I L
MECHANICAL
ME
0
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED, THIS PERMIT COVE�S WORK TO
tl BE DONE ON PRIVATE P OPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PuBLIc
GRADINGIFILL
DOMAIN (CURB$. SIDEWALKS, DBIVEWAVS, MARQUEES, ETC�) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
STATE SURCHARGE
BE MIT APPLICATIONt 180 DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
ENG, REVIEW FEES
SEE SACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MO_AE FORMATION
-APPLICANT. ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
ENG, INSPECTION FEE
0
2550
IN NTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY 05
I
2 EDMONDS. WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANYAND
UANDSCAP NG
INSPECTION FEE
ALLCCAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT HANCE Or THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE A'NSYS E EVENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
E51 NOR LIMIT IN ANYWAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION �
-
fl
TOTAAL AMOUNT DUE
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT; H E READ THIS APPLICATION: THAT THE INFORMATION
APP ICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT. AND THAT AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT 05
Thllppll�i 11 11 llglld by thl
THEOWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC
WILL BE
CALL
[FO
off,-- D�VF F P.Id
AND IN o0lNGTHEW K AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON E.ILOYED
I DOING T C DE TH T
6LATION E 0 CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RE ATING 0
R INSPECTION
OR
�pt,, k,I,dg,d, �pb. p-b-
INWoLq
WORKME ' 0 TIO $URANCE AND RCW 1827�
OF I IALSSiGNATURE DATE
6TtON
SIG T � NE NT 777��
(425)
6
771-0220
A LATE I
77AFTENTION 1 11 1
EXT 333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
771-0221
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
FAX
PINK OWNER - GOLD ASSESSOR
198
z
13 m
C
m
0
80
M
m
JO
CA
0 -" I
n�
-i
mm
w co
0
o Fn
C 0)
M 0
Z
z
ii
co
z
9 1
0
m
t
Buildiug tile Quality Dreani
7'
it. I
Contactt Ron Trickett
-6:1� -un 7
P.O. Box 6068
Edmonds, WA 9802
AS NOTED
Z-46 I
M
Phone: (206)ARPONED
License: MARSEMIUMNEER110
INAGE
EASEMENT
Of
zs
Date:
r
at 4L 0
e%4)
e
Grading Ca1c.
Descrip. Area Depth' Cut C.Y. Fill C.Y.
156
V",
A0
Bldg. Pad Excavation 2100 2
Garage Pad Excay. 850 2 63
-j
"t to ry I
V Q1 OD
Fdn, Perimeter Backfill 1194 2
Garage Backfill_ 636 1.8
88
42' z
�V IOUs
Impery Surlac
Cale. (Proposed)
-
Lot ,fill & Grading 6000 0,25
56
'C)
K I_D) Bldg. Pad 1804:
Driveway Fill
Interior Fdn. Fill 1270 0.67
0
32
Garage 6go!
Driveway 824
Totals 219
218
Cov. Porch 80
Cono, Patio 140
Gar. Stoop 12
Sidewalk 21
;4
T 'MPORARY CONSTRUCTION
E
(6*---
11 Total 3271
ENTRANCE REQUIRED
Lot Area: 9047 s.t
Building Area: 2274 sA
N89*25'09"W
36.00' it
1?A7T4M; c.
Lot Coverage: 28.3 %
Lot Slope; S. 6 07o
4) 3 Lqi I
7 F C, r.' 1V r-- D
0 10*. 20' 40'
01 GRADV46 I
SiteAddress: 18108-6VhP].Wz
� I I I I :: j 1:
J U NI 2 8 illililililli
LSC
WE PLAN
Legal: Lot 9 Of Olympic View Crest
I i i
zu
ALE: V= 201 - 0"
Tax/Parcel 009064-000-009 00
BUILDING DEPT.
Zrmin.!
From: Ron Trickett 425-775-2687 % Mr, Duane Bowan Date: 8/212002 T.M.: 6:30:38 PM P.99 2 .12
ARSHALL
HOMESAL -IL 11
Buildilig the QualityDi-eani T.ZECV,
AUG - 5 2002
August 2, 2002 BUJLDiNG DEPT-
Mr. Duane Bowman
Director ofDevelopMent Services
Z
121 - 5"Ave. N�,
0
Edmonds, WX 98020
0
Re: Plan Check 02-324
rn
Sent Via Fax: 81212002
Dear Mr. Bowman:
M:
I resubmitted a revised site plan reflecting a Minor correction for the above plan check on Wednesday, July
3 1 " 1:00 p.m . The time required to complete the final review based upon this correction
M
at approximately
ve minutes to review and sign off. I have waited 2 1 /1 days to get this
should not have taken more than fii ose of business day today, it si,11 has out been
reviewed and completed and as of the cl
M
minor correction juired correction in the
done, What is more frustrating is the simple fact that this should not have been a req
lot 3 this development by Westar Development (Permit
z
ID -4
first place. This same Plan was constructed on of
2002-0336). His site plan was approved without the building rectangle being drawn to encompass the same
C 2�
architectural projection, I would like an explanation as to why I am being required to do something that
not required for the some plan for another builder. I would also like an explanation as to
-n
was previously
why it takes more than 2 1/2 days to complete a five minute review.
0
o of the reviews on this plan check was July 29ft I did not recieve the
The target date for the completio ately made the correction and resubmitted on
correction until m.onJuly3lst Iimmedi!
10:00 a r ti n
true 0
M M�
planning a o e the co ns
the same day at 1 :00 p.m., The combined delays has cost me aPPro\mI rely ne we k in
-tors to start work based
various subcontral
0
0 Fn
lxi
cycle at an average daily cost of $ 75.00, 1 had also scheduled
this would be ready to be released by no later than July 29th The time to
K 0
upon the expectation that permit
reschedule these people and to get back in the cue will now cost me another week in the construction cycle.
department has cost me $ 750.00 in extr a holding costs simply because someone
-4
The net effect is that your
can't take 5 minutes to finish a review.
I would like an immediate response to the above concerns an d I will expect to be able to Pick up this
permit by no later thin, 12:00 no on on Monday, August 5th.
Respectfully,
z
Rm '7i&4aa
Ron Trickett
M
President
Cc: Gary Haakenson, Mayor
J.nnme Graf, Building Official
Michael Plunkett Council Member Position 91
Larry Linville, Linville, Linton & Clausen, P.S., Attorneys
MARSHALL HOMES, INC-
P,O, Box 6068 - Edmonds, WX 98026
PHOI,-,E: (206) 718-0287 FAX: (4125) 775-2687 contractors License: MARSHH1076RI
CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
1,17'.1 91� Planning Building - Engineering
46p'V�
20,9
August 5, 2002 tp
Ron Trickett z
Marshall Homes 01
P.O. Box 6068
Edmonds, WA 98026
Dear Mr. Trickett
RE: Plan Check 02-1214-
0
Q
0
I have the following responses to your letter dated August 2, 2002: 0
M M,
0 Inequity in Plan Review 10
>
I reviewed the plot plan of the property you mentioned that is the same design as your
proposed single residence, That plan should not have been approved and the builder will
be required to re -submit a new plot plan showing proper height calculations. 0,
Five Minute Review
M M,
Our plan review times are targets for completion. We schedule work to cover not only 0
0
your review but that of all permit applicants, while covering for employees on leave, non- C
permit related projects, etc. We attempt to try to meet the balance the needs ofall of our Fn 0,
K
customers. You expressed a concern regarding getting your permit today and we
responded.
I have passed your concerns on regarding this plan review to the appropriate Division Manager to
z
note and monitor.
to
ly Z'
0
M
'�Now
Development Services Director
Cc: Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
A,
mARSHALL
HoMES
Building the Qual*
ME N
Contact: Ron Trickett
P Box 6068
.0.
dmonds, WA 98026
ZOP 4
SE 10,
FIIONT'—��'r, �--
RAINAGE -p
lvbv,
NT
EA
SIDE ASEME dki,
_ , I
REAR
at
OTHER IN
�2
0'
op
HE16HT— — — — — — — — — — -
zy�
HEIGHT CALCS. Grades
Point Existing Allowed
I
A 341�80 'T td f FY
B 344.60 7,3y -1,., & I
oti
C 346.00 0 Impervious Surface I
m
�T:t Calc. (Proposed)
0 344.08 0)
Avg. Grade 344.10 344.10 Bldg. Pad 1504
J., 'A ",N fij c)/
Act. Bldg. HL 24.96 N/A a
Allow. Bldg. Ht. N/A 25.00 Driveway 824
rage 690
Addit, Adj. to Avg. Grade 0.00 — C6v, Porch 80
Max. Ht. 369.06 369.10 Conc, Patio 140
Proposed Allowed Gar, Stoop 12
Mr. Thk. & 6"grd. cir. 1.46 Sjde�valk 21
Total 3271
Proposed Fin. Fir. Elev. 346.56 Vj0Ar.H1-;/ ApF2LAr-AI-A1—
J -T+�,� t-r tc, I %�QeL 14la?-e, 100
i6:
ot A
oil
LBd,.,
'7—W Lot Coverage: 28.3 %
Lot Area: 8047 s.f.
Building Area: 2274 s.f
N89'25'09"W 36,00, Lot
Lot Slope: J5, 6 07o
ED
R IV
20' 40 60 PFV: 7/31/0-Z-
JUL 1 2 Site Address: 18108 - 60 Pl. XV.
SITE PLAN Legal: Lot 9ofOlynipic View Cres
BUILDING DEPT. 0'r SCALE: 1"=20'-O" Tax/Parcel If: 009064-000-009-0
1"= 2
Zoning: RS-8
n?w
-----------
2
MA'RSHALL --- _,1N8l'5l'Lq"j
Y 2`0 _104 31'
�H �OM �F-S
Building the Qua
-E-
5;-6 9
Contact: Ron Trickett
P.O. Box 6068
dmonds, WA 98026
V
RAINAGE 10, t!1�4 4L Of
FR
ASEMENT
SIDE Le
All 4L
REAR
OTHER
HEIGHT Grade
HEIGHT CALCS, a
Point owed
Existing All
A 341.80 _j y W
344.50 od t'j'
B impervious Surface
ml Cale. (Proposed)
346.00 Qe N - I
C V5 (I- I I �
P)
0� Bldg. Pad 1504
D 344V
Avg. Grade 344.10 344.10 Garage 690
/A
824
Act� Bldg. Ht. Driveway
24.96 N
Allow. Bldg, Hl. NIA 25.00 Cov, Porch 80
'<�7
Addit. Adj. to Avg. Grade 0.00 N/A A Cone. Patio 140
V
Max, Ht. 369.06 369.10 Gar, Stoop 12
Proposed Allowed Sidewalk 21
Fir. Tbk. & Tgrd, dr. 1.46 (,Dr— L+b Total 3271
Proposed Fin. Fir. Elev. 345.56
V je,
L
7 -BKff'.L. f- Lot Area: 8047 s.f.
Building Area: 2274 s.
L Lot Coverage: 28.3 %
N89'25'09"W 36,00' DA Lot Slope: '/0
P,7-UM,,Cj,0,' - I �'
t
R66WED -Z-
20' 40' 60, 0 Site Address: 18108 — 6SV' Pl. W.
JUL1�1�2��� SITE PLAN Legal: Lot 9 ofOlymnic View Crest
SCALE: 111 = 20' - 0" Tax/Parcel #: 0090641-000-009-
Zoning: R
BUILDING DEPT. V'= 20' S-8
Height Calculation Worksheet
Address:
Date: ih-lo- p-e
Inspector(s):
1. Datum Point: C B
r!
2. Datilm Point Elevation -
0,!,
it
3. Average Grade: 71 t o
g.
4. Maximum Elevation Allowed: 7 q( average grade) + 25' 0
M,
5. Reference Point Elevation Shot to House:
M 0,�
-04
t+*/O(datum elevation) +;i,?g (grade to transit.level line shot to house)
1,
M
6. Measurements from line shot onto house to roof ridge:
C Z'!
3, It
33
0
-7, 1;2-5
0
X
Total
M
7. Actual Elevation: q($Aeferece voint elevation) (measurements
from #6)
Co elusion:
0 '36
3 � 9 - 6 o (actual) Is greater /je-s-s-!—aj� (allowed); therefore the house is/
is not over the height requireme'. �pEr ECDC 16.20.30 requirements
LATEWBUILDINGMSOHeight Cakulation Worksheet doc
L
FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM
TO:
DATE:
MEMO TO; PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION
FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DAIT�_
NGINEERING DIVISION DATE—LZ��
PLANNING DIVISION DATE
SITE ADDRES
PERmrr# ADB#_DATEiNspECMD 2— oZ,
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED-1, �kAL=._
A field Inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval
denotes that there are no. objections from the above signed Department to the, release of
PE MIANCE _BONDS and the granting of:
-GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
a Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/conbactor by inspector
,FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES
u Copy of COMECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector
2.
3.
RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - 'GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date Sign—
ocaprvl.doc.l:temp-bldg:for=10/01
z
U)
M
C M 0
0
80
C
M M
M Z
0--i
z
0 -n
M M
a
0
M
Cn
C Ch
M
0
z
z
0
1
0
M
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED
SETBACKS
.................
FOUNDATION:
C,
Footing......................
Wall ..........................
Pier/Porch ..............
Retaining Wall
Slab Insulation ..........
PLUMBING:
Underground
7 tan k
M
C
M,
Rough -in ..............
0
Commercial Final
-4
M
HEATING:
Gas Test ...........
Gas Piping ...............
02
Equipment . ................
0
Commercial Final
M M
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
31 -
0 r-
NAILING ..........................
P-C
0
FRAMING .............. I
M-S )7-1
IT 0
z
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING
INSULATION ...................
Insulation
Floor
Wall Insulation ...........
VAO-TUP OZI LM
10 /1,+
z
Ceiling Insulation
NAILING
z
SHEETROCK
SPECIAL INSPECTION
M
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY ...............
Sideswati,
AluoutPWd$Z4Z�?—Receliptg-44ml'—
Dot, 11501!41-404�9�'XPIMS
AMP -4 6z)&
Am
DatePUrC_haS0d_zj_4a_
AM0UntP1dd$�RCCe'Pt#—