The URL can be used to link to this page

20020597.pdfAT 0 - RECEIVED I 6,�A bz__ PERMIT EXPIRES 'USE PERM ZONE T CITY OF EDMONDS 9_5/_�2 ".. 'El,� 0, CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLIUATION 'OB _ ADDRESS S' V' OWNER NAMEINAMEOF BUSINESS A&I T — \)-e1A4 l-'Aw, JV0 C <--41 /X/A s PLAT NAME;SU801��m "DID AUURE- . ........ LIDFEES [-MAIUNG 1146 VI(�W&A-NIr "USLIC RGIJ) OV -1 PFII 01�111A! Sl TEF. I MAP CITY P_ ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING EO.IRED DEMCATIO 11/45 N`�T)s_,D_ 11 NAME E 1*1,'Ar,�,_ KIETERSIZ I 111 AIA AELtvt�-f s ADDRESS LINE 171 -1 NO, OF, FIXTURES PPVREOUIFED ESV NO 0 9* REMARKS OVINERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLKITAINAGE MA/9 Y PLEPHONE 7, Z-Tr--OVo (.�,I IXjArL7�L (d,) SC-.,Ejt_ NAME ENGINEERING X ADDRESS /I REVJE�E)j a 1. FIRE REVIEWCOSY DATE IF 0 STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHE-CKEDBY VARIANCE OR CU SHORETNE OR ADS' INSUCIPN -REVIEN RED. POSTED YES kl-r. PROPERTY TAX ACCOUN 1 -1- SERA COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED P9010SIll EXP I _2 �_ RESIDENTIAL ILU..W. I E.R LOT COVERAGE ALI-OWED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT) PROPOSED, ERON SIDE � FRONT UP SIDE I, . ADDITION 0 COMMERCIAL C3 COMPLIANCE OR E USE CHANG O� USE U U A' 10 4A lolia Z 0 REMODEL APARTMENT SIGN PARKING LOT RED D AREA PLANNING REVIE'A ED BY 'DATE REPAIR Ei F NEE 14 !2#a CY-S, PROVIDED X ITI ARKS C3 DEMOLISH C] TANK OTHER iv, otntwt- OARAGE Y RENEWAL .LG WALL 1. CARPORT 0 32FO (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN; /5t/m /I il)67L/64�;- CHECKEDBY co;�O N NUMBEROF CRITICAL In2_ 1,2 DWELLING ItYPEOFOOM-TAUCTIO1 POOP VZ I GCCUFAW� A IAS STORIES IS NUMBER .1Z,.IroKToR REOL 0 OCCUPANT./ f� DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE JAIII Y s Z AD a LOAD ,V.1 REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D AA01�: &2�19,EW 2000 u�Ajn�� VALUATION PEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT 6A;�r"161�417ING I -1w BUILDING -9 a PLAN CHECK 90: n� AV- PLUMBING - - THIS PERMIT AUTHOR1111 ON KTO LY THE WORK NOIEU THIS PERMIT COVERS WOR MECHANICAL 1= BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY, ANY CONSTRUCTION ON T E PUB H LiC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, U SEPARATE PERMISSION, ETC. WILLAEO IRE GRADINGIFILL AT -LPlll-.E MIT APIL=TION: 180 DAYS PE PERMIT LIMIT, I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SN REVIEW FEES SEE SACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG� INSPECTION FEE IN NTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS rHE CITY OF LANDSCAPING 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANYAND IF A FOR INSPECTION FEE LCI-I,IMS DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE.ARISING, RECTLIOR INDIRECTLY III FR M THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT ISSUANCE OF THI GPER.IT -ALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY. WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT FAIYCITY ORDINANCE PLAN CifECK DEPOSIT RIC11,51 el 1 -2 NORUMITINANYWAYTH CITY�S ABILITY TO ENIORCE A Y ORDINANCE FROVISION,� N -_ 10.1 AMOUNT DUE IHFRES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION. 'HAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR 'HE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER, I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRU T G BASS c DING THE WORK AUTHORIZED TH Y NO PERSON WILL CALL Th-11pl-L.- - . ,l ,ION,ANDIN BE EMPLOYED IOLATIO THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHWGION RELATING T 6111-1 1111.1��.Dllll'l "I F I,,I __ _ �IPI FOR INSPECTIO14 ORKMEN P NSATION 'SURANCE AND RCWIS.27. IICNAIUIR� ATE SIGNED (425) jALS DATE z 7.1022- 41,4 pa � 36&4T�-L2� ATTENTION EXT 333 411ESID BY IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771 0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. USC SECTION 109 FAX 5196 0 X c m ma 0 80 c -4 9 X M M Z ID a 05 0 -n m M Z� 01, 0 M C CIO 9 ch M 0 z co z 0 0 m HEIGHT, I T IME...' 3281 ST. 3281 SF� f6o9 s., 179 s., I 'o 3v 059 S.F. sl 179 S.F. N41 S.F. —30 181 ST. 181 S.F. T,W 6-750- C—ASC-A—DE-D—RIV-E—1 — - — - — -- ct -1 —ww- v-1—V=3"-- Lu CL CL R Wnll- Wiff J2011 L -FIVED BUILDING DEPT. �ED P-W-PL%AN\"l'Nl SCALE 1'-30' ITY COPY llo I DONNA L. BRESKE, P.E. 14712MeadowRd. Lynnwood, WA98037 Phone: 425-742-6386 Fax: 425 -797-9330 RECEIVED NOV 2 1 2001 'M DRAINAGE DETENTION DESIGN STop ENGINEERING DWISION FOR SALINAS DATE(S�EP �BER20, 2001 SITE: Om AVE. W. & Cascade Dr. 20204 92ND AVE.W., Lot A EDMONDS, WA L14 13 6, SALINAS LOT 44A't Attached are design and supporting calculations for the installation of a single family lot detention system. impervious area used to size the detention system includes Z (�'�750 square feet for a proposed impervious area including the house and driveway. 0' A 36" diameter detention pipe and release orifice are designed in accordance with M, the SCS method for storm water control. The system is designed to detain the 10-year and 100-year 24-hour storms and release at the pre -developed rates for both the 10 and in: 100-year storms. 0 0 ci Outfall from the detent ion system is released to an existing catch basin within the in t of 9�"d -year storm event is .07 -way Ave. W. The controlled release for the 100 right -of io C cfs. 0 -n, mm 0 ra� 0 6 R In Z; m A L-1 f1s S&PT 2-0, 2-00) smic 1 '201 o g, 51-m- vt-w'l VRAI p I 13Y 0TVIER5- IN WATER ��l 1401 1975 PLAN ----------- ---------------- N 'E" --------------- SSMH RIM--364.98' 12"C", -------- ------------- ... VV .......... b R =364 5 ;OXES a E=363.11 1 6" PVC E-W H wv MAIL BOXE 8:'PVC E, I vm CTR. CH, IE=358.7' N -sD ------ ---------- " A5�1 s; ECT IC TRANSFO CRETE PAD I'm Ccof�N T9oR;pTQ u1c 115R Tj \Ni 774 6RATED LIC) TJB i m ---- --- --- 26' NOT ROUTE FOOTINCT DRAINS -NR00r214 DUTENTIC"'I FOOTIN5 00W5 CANBEnED Op C I USE OOWMSTEAM m r-LEAN-Our (IT jqoAI'rDF'(cNmrc garage I k SALINAS HOUSE A05- Nf2 (PRELIM. FOOTPRINT) APPROX. IMPERMEABLE SURFA E ryp 6J50 60.FT. Lp CO 4t 2 - TYPE I NVITH40rC0140 TOP= 9Y.8,4 MIN -09 LOT A driveway N 8" C 1.2" DONNA L. BRESKL-P-1, (P NOTi=-S: 1, MAIN-rIlIN 1,7' �A 14712 NfEADOW ROAD MINIMUM covelz ova-fK LYNNWOOD, WA 98037 ENTIRE LEN671-1 oP PHONE: 425-742-6386 ':;ETr-NTtop P(PI; FAX. 425-787-9330 INcOMIM6 FLOWS Vl� cONVbYAN I,jp cAm BE coNNGr-'rE:D cg� A I MIN IE=365.6 9 salielas Dro�nage Cq (cs te i 0( Aue W. i 12, 0(00 A (derwood 6�Mue lly EXISTING CONOMONS: Assume xwl C-'r&'j+l' reef'st Ow -5o7'l Group C Rerw6us .275- Ac lrnperv�oos 0 Z_ Z: E DFUF-LOPEO CONDTTION(s ,750 5F IS�, CN=qB 6 q PervioL* 12,, 00 (c 76-0 = 3-2ZS-0 .12-0 hc am m a Z LU RCP�Sldeflj�dl Lc('ldS—Pinq jrj+-eeisiij (7. r 2,q. hr. sfotw ederif 2 lot 0 2.4 U,5 e- Tr ywl ror 0 3,0 P101 bo+h eVis+ing a0d deueloped. m M, 00 ro. 0 n 9/26/01 page SALINAS SEPTEMBER 20, 2001 EDMONDS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A10OX NAME: 100 YR 24 HR EXISTING SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... 0.28 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION .... 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.28 Acres Z fit TIME INTERVAL .... 10.00 min CN.... 81.00 TIME OF CONC ..... 0.00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA..: 0.00 Acres m CN.... 98.00 PEAK RATE: 0.07 cfs VOL: 0.03 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min am C m 0. BASIN ID: AIOX NAME: 10 YR 24 HR EXISTING m SBUH METH ODOLOGY 10 TOTAL AREA ....... 0.28 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs C- z RAINFALL TYPE .... TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION .... 2.00 inches AREA-: 0.28 Acres 0-n TIME INTERVAL .... 10.00 min CN.... 81.00 -nx TIME OF CONC ..... 10.00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA 32 ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA..: 0.00 Acres mm CN.... 98.00 PEAK RATE: 0.02 cfs VOL: 0.01 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 0 Fn M 0, BASIN ID: B100D NAME: 100 YR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY z TOTAL AREA ....... 0.28 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... TYPEIA PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION .... 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.12 Acres z TIME INTERVAL .... 10.00 min CN.... 86.00 TIME OF CONC ..... 10.00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA ... 0.16 Acres m CN .... 98.00 PEAK RATE: 0.13 cfs VOL: 0.05 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 9/20/01 page 2 SALINAS SEPTEMBER 20, 2001 2', EDMONDS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: B10D NAME: 10 YR 24 HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... 0.28 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE.... TYPEIA PERVIOUS AREA 0— PRECIPITATION .... 2.00 inches AREA..: 0.12 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... 10.00 min CN.... 86.00 AREA 0 M� TIME OF CONC ..... 10.00 min IMPERVIOUS ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA..: 0.16 Acres p CN.... 98.00 PEAK RATE: 0.08 cfs VOL: 0.03 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min rn O� M .0 M M 0 Fn M X M page 4 9/20/01 SALINAS SEPTEMBER 20, 2001 EDMONDS STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. PI Description: DETENTION PIPE Diameter: 3.00 ft- Length: 76.00 ft. slope... 0.0050 ft/ft 0 -4 Pt'pe_ /ell orn -e gr Vo Ca I colai-e Dec( 1 #1 -rjpe CBS, a M ,C: 01�� MO 31, X 12 ADS -N12 Reducer M PEAK EL 5" 04 31o" AD5-N12 Z, '01 0 �jl MM: 67? M0 30.3 za x Y Z, le#A o� 36 ppe, Z; 707 3 per LF6� 3' M, 7,07 36 d"Onjef er P (Pe is & 3 �72,64 JseJ73 LF] 9/20/01 page 5 SALINAS SEPTEMBER 20, 2001 EDMONDS DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST COMBINATI ON DISCHARGE ID No. Cl Description: COMBINATION DISCHARGE Structure: 01 Structure: structure: NI Structure: Structure: 0;. M, NOTCH WEI R ID No. NI Description: NOTCH WEIR Weir Length: 0.1670 ft- Weir height (p): 0.5000 ft. Elevation : 365 -60 ft. Weir Increm: 0.10 M MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 01 ma 0' 00, Description: ORIFICE outlet Elev: 363.30 M, M Elev: 362.30 ft Orifice Diameter: 0.7500 in. 0 � C z 0 nx M M: 0 C rw M. page 6 9/20/01 SALINAS SEPTEMBER 20, 2001 EDMONDS LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STG- -DIS- I -PEAK- STORAGE t4ATCH -------- DESCRIPTION --------- I (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id-STAGE� id VOL (cf) PEA K 0-0 2 0.08 Pi Ci 365.15 11 303.83 0.02 10 YR 24 MR .................. 0.07 0.13 PI Cl 365.85 12 451.40 0, o7 -4, 100 YR 24 HR ................. c); C A > z r 0 -n m 0 0 'mo 0� 0 -4 GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: �.dedrnondSWaxs DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning Building Engineering August20,2003 Attn: John and Judy Salinas Z 1140 Viewland Way 0 Edmonds, WA 98020 Building Permit: 2002-0597 Site Address: 20202 92nd Ave W m Expiration Date: 8/9/04 M Dear John and Judy Salinas: m m R 11 The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the last remaining inspection on your project is a final inspection(s). The final inspection(s) determines that there are no 4— outstanding life -safety issues and approval allows the City to close your permit file. -1� 0) 0 The City considers the final inspection to be one of the most important inspections conducted on a project. In order to grant final approval the following must be complete: M m smoke detectors, house numbers, guardrails, handrails, self -close doors between garage 0), 0 and residence, egress from sleeping rooms, safety glazing, weather-stripping, any 0 C Engineering department requirements etc. Of course not all of these things may mo specifically apply to your project but it does give you an idea about the kinds ofthings that must be complete as well as some items that do not need to be installed such as: paint, carpet, moldings, wallpaper, etc. Please be advised permits expire one year from the date ofissuance. Ifyou will need more time to complete the work, permits can be renewed prior to expiration for one half fees. If the permit expires without a final Z� approval granted by the Building Inspector, Rill fees are required in order to renew the permit. This can be very costly to you and we strongly encourage you to check your Z permit expiration date and call for the required final inspection(s). Note: If more than one department is required to final your project, this is noted on yo ur Job Card. 0 m Please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220 ifyou have any questions. Sincerely, Permit Coordinator Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 Wabsile: �ci.edmonds—us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning Building Engineering January 28, 2003 Mark Johnson z 9220 Cascade Drive E Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Concrete Wall — 20202 92d Avenue — Edmonds (Building Permit 2002-0597) n Dear Mr. Johnson: M in response to your two requests outlined in your letter of January 28, 2003, 1 have the following responses: C rn 0 0 1. Is your letter your formal interpretation of issuing your permit? Ifnot I am requesting one from you or the C city attorney. M My letter of./artuary 22, 2003 stands as ourposition on the retaining wall. M 'D �i 2. What are my rights ofappeal? I have asked your staffthree times and nobody had an answer. How many C > �e� days do I have to appeal? What are the fees? What are the filing requirements? You have two choicesfor appealing the slaffdecision regarding this permit. Theyare:, 0 "n n ;a The approved buildingpermit could be appealedpursuant to Edmonds Community Development M M Code (ECDQ 20.100.040. (A copy is enclosed). Three persons living in separate dwellings within C4 300feet ofthe subject property mustfile the appeal stating their reasonsfor the appeal The F, appealfee is S500.00; or C (a Another appeal could befiled under theprovisums ofECDC20,105.030 (A copy is enclosvd). Q 0! You mustfile the appeal within 14 calendar days ofthe date ofthe staffilecision andfollow the provisions ofECDC20.105,020 (A copy is enclosed). For the purposes ofthis stafftlecision and appeal, the date ofthis letter constitutes thefinal staffilecision, Thefee is $150,00. I respectfully disagree with you on your opinion of how I and my staff acted on this permit. We researched the issue decision. While z and required very detailed information from the permit applicant before we made our you wanted us to hold the permit for your review, we are not obligated to do so and in fact are obligated to issue the permit when C4 t it is ready, which is what we did. There is one thing I wish that had happened and that was to call you when we z issued the permit, even though we were under no code requirement to do so. In fact, I did call you as soon as I was aware the permit was issued, which was the next morning. 0 M Further you insinuate that I lied to you in your postscript that "If you did call Mr. Salinas before issuing the permit..." I resent your insinuation. I did called MT. Salinas and asked that he call you. As I told both you and Mr. Salinas, he (Salinas) was under no obligation to do so but I thought it to be the neighborly thing to do to discuss the situation with the wall. Mr. Salinas chose not to call you. The bottom line is Mr. Salinas was issued his permit that staffd`,� rrmned to be consistent with code. If you choose to appeal the approved building perri-xit, I have outlined ons above. Sincerkly, ',-/4)dLMan r Development Services Director Attachments Cc: File 2002-0597 Mayor Haakenson Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan MARK J. & SHERRI L. JOHNSON 9220 CASCADE DRIVE EDMONDS, WA 9S020 #206-940-1115 January 28, 2003 RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2003 Duane Bowman Development Services Director DEVELOPNIENT SEFIVICES City of Edmonds RE: Concrete Wall - 20202 92�' Avenue - Edmonds (Building Permit 2002-0597) Dear Duane: My legal council and I are requesting in writin a clarification as to your letter. 1. Is your letter your formal interpretation of issuing your permit? if not I am requesting one from you or the city attorney. 2. What are my rights to appeal? I have asked your staff three times and nobody had an answer. How many days do I have to appeal? What are the fees? What are the filing requirements? I initially felt I was dealing with you in good faith. With over ten personal visits your development services department and two written complaints I think I made my concerns very clear to you and your staff. I find that )p-pyr actions in handling this matter have been less than honorable. I completely understand and ati acti our acknowledge that you were legally obligated to issue the permit upon s sf on of y required conditions though I completely disagree with your interpretation in allowing this permit to be issued. I do appreciate the efforts that your staff went through to review this situation. My issues with you are that you stated to me in more then one conversation that though not required, you or one of your Staff members would contact me upon issuing this permit. You did not! Why am I making this an issue? Well because you eliminated a legal right and a possible final effort to stop Mr. Salinas by court order - BEFORE HE POURED HIS WALL I did not have a minute, an hour or even a day to review with my legal council your terms and interpretation of granting a permit to Mr. Salinas. You new tell me the permit was issued very late on Tuesday - January 21" and to no surprise Mr. Satin -as had concrete trucks on site the next morning at 7 am. pouring his wall. The slightest common sense and seeming standard procedure that any professional city office would be to first address the person who filed a complain% even if it was not in his or her favor, before a permit was issued. Keep in mind your staff required me to fill out a formal complaint on this issue. From December at f 10, 2002, and every couple of days thereafter I either stopped by or c led your of ice to ge updates I talked to either you, Kathleen Taylor or Ann Bulfis. It is unconsuable to me that you and your staff overlooked the fact that I was to be contacted upon this permit being issued. A permit. that had as much discussion and debate a-, this one did and not even call or letter was issue until after the work was completed. Only when I called you and Mayor Haakenson did your letter finally appear. Furthermore, I asked you weeks ago if you allowed the wall remain at. the current height, and I appealed your decision what would you do. You also stated to me that you would be "hard pressed" to allow this to go forward having this issue "unresolved" and knowing that I could file an appeal that would then go to the Hearing Examiner. I realize, at least I think I still have that tight even your statement of possibly stopping work on the wall no longer holds true. Z� am ca mo 0: m 0 -n m M a 0 0 FT, C C4 m 0 Z 0 m January 28, 2003 You also made an untrue statement when you stated to me and to Mayor Haakenson that I had the same legal option now as I did a month ago, untrue. I have had no option and I could not make any decisions on what to do next until you issued the permit. At one time, you and your staff lead me to believe that you may make Mr. Salinas lower his wall. Another time you said he could probably do it but you would never give me the exact ECDC that would allow it to happen. If you issued the permit and required Mr. Salinas to lower his wall then I clearly would not have had any ftirther issues. You state "Definition 21.90.150 Structure" aflows Mr. Salinas to add an additional three foot "retaining wall". Key word being "retaining wall". Ye% in "Definition 21.30.020 Fence" it clearly states "Any portion of a base or foundation for the fence which does not serve as a bQna fide pwposic QUctaining-cwth shall mt bc cQuiii[der—ed a EcIaMmug waff but rather a part of the fence." In that case, per zoning regulation 17.30.000 C - a variance must first be obtained. You have allowed a Yl 1 " retaining waIl then a Y backfdl wall and then a 4? fence/wall totaling 10'11". Bona fide means "being exactly as appears" and furthermore it states "retaining earth", not back fill. The extra Y that you are allowing is not only = retaining earth but it has never "exactly appeared!' to retain earth like the "lower T11" retaining wall". Thus, it shall not be considered a retaining wall but rather part of the fence. YOU SHOULD NO`I* HAVE ISSUED THIS PEMIT as you did. You still have not addressed this point and explained why it is not valid, I do not feel that anybody after seeing this wall would say that doing this was within the intent of any of the definitions or ordnance's. This is in addition to the other disputed grade elevation issue. Z The way you and your staff handled this at the end leaves many unanswered questions. What would have been the harm in allowing this issue to run it course legally without allowing work to be done just on the (a west wall. Keep in mind I have never asked for work to be stopped on the house but only on the west wall. I am not sure; if an architect, who, you may feel, knows more about your own definitions and ordinances, intimidated you into pushing this through, or is it just small town politics. Kathleen Thylor did tell me that architect Mr. Waite has done many "approved" projects with the City of Edmonds, and "knows what he is doing". I most certainly now feel you were playing both side of the fence, so to speak, and when I turned to my city government to protect my property you turned your back. Is it not the intent of ordinances and city codes to protect the property owners of the City of Edmonds? If so, why do I now have a "freeway wAP' on my property fine? If the City of Edmonds allows this type of manipulation of its codes and thinks it is okay, then we are all in trouble. just look at the results and tell me it look s just fine. Please respond A-S.A.R so that I once again do not miss out my legal options. Sincerely, co Z W��— 4�-- 9 M J. Johnson M P.S. If you did actually contact Mr. Salinas before issuing the permit, he never even attempted to contact me to try to work anything out - I am not surprised. I haw included three pictures: A. This is what we now look at towering over the front of our house and driveway -10'-11"wall. B. The wall from Mr. Salinas side. Clearly not retaining any "bona fide" earth. C. The Boe's property under the same short plat and topographical layout as the Salinas property. Nicely conftirming to the neighborhood and not raised three extra feet Now because of your ruling the fine property could raise their lot three feet to better their view. You would tell them no because?????????? CC Mayor Haakenson -xW -.''T ILI Z�z -F!,Il�!j1j11jpiql 07 ..... ...... 74; tip 0 RPTm,' 111111. rrowd GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 STH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: �ciedmonds.wa.ua DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Isq,) Planning Building - Engineering January 22, 2003 Mark Johnson 9220 Cascade Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Proposed Concrete Wall — 20202 92 n' Avenue — Edmonds (Building Permit 2002-0597) Z� 0 Dear Mr. Johnson: As promised the purpose ofthis letter is to respond to your inquiry and complaints regarding the proposed concrete wall/fence being proposed by your neighbor at 20202 92d Avenue, Edmonds, under Building Permit 2002-0597. M C Based upon your inquiries, City staff halted work on the proposed wall adjacent your to property until the ITI applicant could provide documentation that the proposed wall was being constructed per code, The issued M; applicant submitted all requested information and the revision to permit 2002-0597 was yesterday M M afternoon. I apologize for not calling you yesterday afternoon to inform you that the permit was issued, but I did not find out that the permit was issued until late this mornin .9 This staff decision was not taken lightly. We listened to your concerns, checked with the City Anomey and reviewed all the pertinent information before issuing the approval to continue construction on the wall. The permit applicant submitted very detailed information showing spot elevations along the wall identifying height and details. 0 -n where original grade was located, where retaining walls were placed, elevations, plan The information submitted showed compliance with code and the permit was approved. :r M M The permit applicant is building a retaining wall to hold the original grade along his common property line a 0 6 with your property, He is further allowed to place a retaining wall under three feet in height within the setback and can backfill behind it (ECDC 21.90.150). He is further allowed to construct a fence on top of this retaining wall (ECDC 17.30. 000 (D)). In this particular case, the applicant constructed his allowed existing earth. He then added four additional feet 0 Z three foot retaining wall atop the retaining wall retaining for a fence as allowed under ECDC 17,30.000 (D). M You have disputed the grade elevations. As I told you, the City is using the topography from the short subdivision that you completed to create the subject property as our basis for checking height elevations. Z The permit submittals show the wall to comply with the height elevations based upon the original grades that existed at the time of the short subdivision. You are welcome to review the file and all documents related to this permit: As I explained to you today, because the City received all the pertinent information and the proposal complies with the Edmonds 0 Commu D I t C de (ECDC), the City is obligated to issue the permit. eve opmen a M Since a. Development Services Director Cc: File 2002-0597 Mayor Haakenson Incorporated August 1], 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan Waite Architects 324 Main Street phone (425) 774.5533 Edmonds, WA fax (425) 774.1930 98020 USA waltearch@compuserve.com TO City of Edmonds Planning Department ATTN Kathleen Taylor 0.1 DATE 07 January 2003 0 nff FROM Stephen Waite, AIA ED ;I R E Fie -Revision to Permit #2002-0597 C Salinas Retaining wall/fence. m _01 Your letter dated 02 January, 2003 0 C" M m M, Please find below responses to your letter dated 02 January regarding the above subject matter. Attached for C: IN reference are two drawing sheets 24" x 36" dated 06 January 2003 and the structural engineers revised detail drawings #7 and #8 dated 01/07/02. 'R -0. RgtAining WalliFence Details N�" a) Western Wall M 0 All heights are measured from original grade as indicated in sectional details. Construction field superintendents measurements utilize original plat survey as in prior submittal. 4 b) Southern Wall Z noted in attached drawings Z 0; If we can provide further information or clarifications please do not hesitate to call. RECEIVED JAN - 7 21312 PERMIT COUNTER Waite Architects 324 Main Street phone (425) 774.5533 Edmonds, WA fax (425) 774.1930 98020 USA waitearch@compuserve.com 0: d C) To City of Edmonds Engineering Department ATTN Lyle Chrisman DATE 07 January 2003 0�' FROM Stephen Waite, AIA 0 RE Re -Revision to Permit #2002-0597 Salinas Retaining wall/fence. C z Your letter dated 31 December, 2002 0 M Please find below responses to your letter dated 02 January regarding the above subje t matter. Attached for reference are two drawing sheets 24!' x 36" dated 06 January 2003 mm Ali submitted to the plan intake coordinator. 0B 0 r..", CK k�" 0 th M& 1) Attached 2) See section drawing with adjacent grades. 3) See revision notes #1 and #2 on sheet # 2 of 2. 01, Wall drains will not be connected to the detention system, 4) The owner/contractor will comply. Z, 01 If we can provide further informatio n or clarifications please do not hesitate to call. RECEIVED AN J 7 W" PERMIT COUNTER firm, GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 5THAVENUE NORTH - EDIACNDS,WA98020 - (425) 771-M) FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: w�wxl.edrrondsma,us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning Building Engineering C. 1 December 13, 2002 Z1, Mi. Steve Waite Waite Architects 324 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Retaining Walls M In 0 0 —1 00� Dear Mr. Waite: M In response to your facsimile dated December 10, 2002 1 have enclosed the current City handouts .10 C Z on fences and retaining walls/rockeries. It is our intent for both design professionals and citizens > r- =i to use our handouts in preparing complete plans for permit submittal. Please be advised, the City is currently in the process ofupdating our public handout on retaining 0 walls and rockeries and it is highly likely that some policy and/or definition changes will occur m m with this revision. I will try to remember to mail you a copy of the revised handout once it is 0 approved. It is the intent of all of our public handouts to assist citizens in obtaining permits and 0 In, C (a to eliminate confusion. m 0, Regarding the ECDC provisions of 18.40.020 and 21.90.150 that you referenced in your letter, 5r the first is describing permit requirements and the second is defining the term 'structure'. I do not understand what conflictoccurs between these two code sections. Additional commentaty from you on this matter would be required in order for me or the appropriate staff member to respond in greater detail, p", As for possible Uniform Building Code (UBC) contradictions I refer you to UBC Section 101.3 Z: which states, 'Where, in any specific case, different sections of this code specify different 0 materials, methods of construction or other requirements, the most restrictive shall govern. Where there is a conflict between a general requirement and a specific requirement, the specific requirement shall be applicable.' Again, please specifically cite any UBC provisions that you believe are in conflict regarding retaining walls and I will be happy to inform you which code provision rules. Sinc"e Building Official Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sinter Citu - Hp.kinan Janan 4710t— Waite Architect�: Z44 3 m i, Ph- 24 Main Street fax (415) $20 --774,-1 s Edmonds. WA 9 9 20 wa,6' Ift 8020 USA 0-- Z 0 TO City of Edmonds Building Department FAX No. 771.0221 m ATTN ANN BULLIS, ASSISTANT BUILDING OFFICIAL, T. m 0 0 DATE ioDECEMBEF12002 16:50 C FROM. Stephen Waite, AIA m SALINAS RETAINING WALL, AND FENCE CORREPTION: M Z RE Ann, 4W 0 �P Dear advise on how we might prqpe",lin m For our future information could you please 0 0 rn permits for retaining walls. C 01, The authors of the ECDC and Department Handouts a re somewhat sp9,Clfic-Aqd-6i�:.:-- UBC. confusion lies in perhaps some contradictions ;o the ed For example in ECDC 18.40.020 no permit is requir for retai Also stated in 21.90.150, retaining walls less than three teet.lh helgb1*kfidC., z in height. n considered structures. Other examples that discuss fences seem to be Po 091 thoughts. z Thanking you in advance for your c ourtesy and efforts extended. :7 0 m Sieve ToT'i4L' P. Waite Architects 324 Main Street phone (425) 774-5533 Edmonds, WA fax (425) 774.1 930 98020 USA waitearch@compuserve.com HAND DELIVERED TO CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DEPARTMENT z 0 ATTIN KATHLEEN TAYLOR 0 DATE 17 JULY 2002 FROM Stephen Waite, AIA RE PLAN CHECK: 02-274 20202 92 nd Ave. W. OM U'D �t 11 OWNER: SALINAS mo 80 C Dear Kathleen, m m Find below our responses to your letter dated 05 July 2002 and receive d by us on 16 July C� 2002. For your records could you please note our fax number as printed above (the number indicated on the fax sheet is my home phone number 1) Datum Point Please see Sheet #1, upper right hand corner, intersection of Cascade 0 n and 92nd. SSMH RIM = 364.98'. "Datum" point was hand written on plan mm at time of application. 0,- OM C C* Heiaht Calculation Addition error on our part. Will correct on submitted sheets to m P; z reflect an average grade of 366.92' instead of 366.96'. Z Rocker! j Retaining Wa Please see Sheet # 1 (Revised 7/08/02). All retaining walls at the property line are less than V-0" in height. "Top of wall' elevation notes Z: indicate the top of concrete " fences", Said fences are typically a maximum 4' tall placed on top of a 3' retaining wall. m Gradinct Please see Sheet #C-1 dated 7/15/02 for calculations depicting less than 500 c.y. Please do not hesitate to call if you require further clarifications. Your courtesy and efforts have been s incerely appreciated. Respectf V F D Stephen Waite, AIA JUL 1 2092 Attachments: Site plan d. 7/08/02 (three copies 8.5" x 11 NOTE: Two copies (M'06") of Sheet # I d. July 08, 2002 were delivered DEVEL, �Ptlp,; to Lyle Chrisman on 7116/02. MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC. Evezeff Office 917-134th Street SW Suit A-1 Everett, WA 98204 ph 42.5.742.9360 lax 425.745.1737 MTE No.: E3051 rac—ts Offlee Project: SALINAS RESIDENCE 10029 S. cma Way Ta Address: 20202 92'd Avenue W, Edmonds, WA Suite E-2 Taw�a, WA 98499 Permit #: 2002-0597 (City of Edmonds) ph 253.584.3720 7. F� E C 155 R I T7 D tax 253.584.3707 Owner: John Salinas Construction Pontland Office Z�' Architect: Waite Architects 791 NE 33rd Drive Suit le:190 0 Engineer: Canfield P.Mand, OR 97211 m! Contractor: John Salinas Construction BUILDING DEPT ph 503,281.7516 fax 503.28 .7579 Page 3 % M Date: 3/20/03 :m 0: Weather: Inspection: Project Management Reviewed p' *ect file, job status and drafted final letter to the City of Edmonds building r0i M m 10 '0 department. > N To the best of our knowledge, all items inspected today are in conformance with approved plans and specifications. ni INSPECTOR: Stuart Carter mm' C V, z Z' Mr REVIEWED BY: Mark K.Galusha, P.E. cc:Bldg Dept -City of Edmonds, John Salinas -John Salinas Construction ...... .... . Everett Office MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 917-134 in Street SIN Suite A-1 Everett. WA 98204 ph 426. 742.9360 fax 425.745.1737 March 20, 2003 PZECEIVED Tacoma Offloo 1OD29 S. Tacoma Way S ulte E-2 Tam a, WA 98499 City of Edmonds Building Department MAR 2 6 ph 252 .4.,72, fax 121 5th Avenue N 2515B4,3707 Edmonds, WA 98020-3146 E,111LIDING DEPT. Portland Office 7911 NE 33rd Drive Suite 190 Aftn.: Jeannine Graff Portland, OR 97211 0' ph 503281,7515 fax 503.281.7579 Re: The Salinas Residence Permit # 2002-0597 K nd 2020292 Avenue West con Edmonds, WA M, 01 0 C' Gentlemen, M M Effective February 27, 2003 Mayes Testing Engineers. was selected by the owner to complete the special inspections on the project noted above. We understand that Cascade Testing performed inspections prior to this date. This letter is to inform you that registered special inspections performed by Mayes 0 -n Testing Engineers have been completed for this project as per our reports, copies of M R which have been sent you and are also enclosed. MI. 'Cca To the best of our knowledge, all work inspected by Mayes Testing Engineers was K K either performed in accordance with, or corrected to conform to, the city approved M 0, Z drawings, or engineer approved changes. Special inspection was provided for: 1. Structural Steel Welding Z� We trust that this provides you with the information you require. Should you have any 0 questions please contact us. M� Sincerely, MAYES TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. Michael S. Dolder, P.E. Vice President Enclosure: (1) Mayes Testing Engineers Inspection Reports Everett office MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC- 917-134th Street Sw Suite A, Everett, IWA 98204 ph 425.742, 360 tax 425.74591737 MTE No.: E3051 Tacoma Office 10029 S. Tacoma WaY Project: SALINAS RESIDENCE Suite E-2 Address: 20202 92"' Avenue W, Edmonds, WA Tacoma, WA 98499 Perni 2002-0597 (City of Edmonds) ph 253.584.3720 tax 253.584.3707 Portland Office Owner: John Salinas Construction 7911 NE 33rd Drive Z� w., Architect: Waite Architects Suite-190 Engineer: Canfield Forflarxi, OR 972t I ph 503.2811515 M: Contractor: John Salinas Construction fax 503.281 �7579 Page 2 -4 n! Ca Date: 3111103 rn 0� -4 Weather: Cloudy 0 t"4 Inspection: Structural Steel Welding Continued with inspection of entry tower frame-up to high roof elevation. Found completed work M M. :51 modification sketch from engineer (sketch #4) dated Z Jin conformance with approved pla ns and 0�_ 3-4-03, Inspected roof level erection and welding of ridge beam, hip beams, ridge splice, and jack rafters 0 (WIU12)—found completed work in conformancewith plans and engineers revision sketches. In M, Welds we re visually inspected for conformance with AWS D-1.1 criteria. 0 0 To the best of our k onformance with approved plans nowledge, all items inspected today are in c . . . . . . . and specifications. INSPECTOR: Tom Cain M th Moi z 0 M .0 REVIEWED BY. alusha, P.E. alus cc:Bldg Dept -City f Edmonds, John Salinas -John Salinas Construction I Everett office MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 917�134th Street SW Suite A-1 Everet, WA 98204 ph 4M 74Z9360 tax 425.745,1737 MTE No.: E3051 Tacoma Office IOD29 S.TacomaWay Project: SALINAS RESIDENCE Suite E4 Address: 20202 92" Avenue W, Edmonds, WA Tacoma, WA 98499 Permit M 2002-0597 (City of Edmonds) ph 253. 584X20 tax 253.584,3707 Portland Office Owner: John Salinas Construction 7911 NE 33rd Drive Z� Architect: Waite Architects Suite 190 Portland, OR 97211 Engineer: Canfield ph 503.281.7515 Contractor: John Salinas Construction lax 503.281.7579 M Page 2 Vi Date: 3111103 M Weather: Cloudy M in, Inspection: Structural Steel I Welding Continued with inspection of entry tower frame-up to high roof elevation. Found completed work m m i conformance with approved plans and modification sketch from engineer (sketch #4) dated n 3-4-03. inspected roof level erection and welding of r idge beam, hip beams, ridge splice, and jack rafters 0 (WIU12)—found completed work in conformancewith plans and engi neers revision sketches. -n 2), Welds were visually inspected for conformance with AWS D-1,1 criteria. ;I M r", —00 To the best of our knowledge, all items inspected today are in conformance with approved plans 0 'p and specifications. 0: Mo. INSPECTOR: Tom Cain Z; Z' 0 M, REVIEWED BY. alusha, P.E. G-lush., P E. s7 cc:Bldg Dept -City , IfEdmonds, John Salina s-John Salinas Construction Etareff Office MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC 917-134th Street SW Suite A-1 Everett, WA 98204 ph 425.742.9360 lax 425.745.173 IMTE No.: E3051 Deanne 0117 Project: SALINAS RESIDENCE 10029 S, Tamma Way Suite E-2 Address: 2020292 nd Avenue W, Edmonds, WA Tamma, WA 98499 Permit M 2002-0597 (City of Edmonds) ph 253.564.3720 fax 253,584.3707 Portland Offlee Owner: John Salinas Construction 7911 NE 331d DrW Architect: Waite Architects Suite 190 Engineer: Canfield Portland, OR 97211 503.281,7515 ph Contractor: John Salinas Construction nZECOVOTTll 503-281-7579 0 Page 1 M MQZ I 'X33 Date: 2127/03 PE-HOM"r COUNTERI VVeather: Clear Cl M "-a 11 �� 0 Inspection: Structural Steel Welding rn 0 Onsite for structural steel/welding inspection. Talked to project superintendent, Jim M. (Cascade Testing), regarding work inspected to date. Owner has elected to have MTE complete m inspections. At time of inspection, welders have fit up and begun welding high level roof frame for c: entry tower and TS frames below. Reviewed fit -up work, electrode storage, and inspection > C details with welders. Reviewed anticipated inspection requirements with Jim. 65 Noted some minor discrepancies between connection details being utilized and those on the 0 p", plans. Also, there is some question as to member size and details for some connections at the Discussed this Jim, and he is to contact architecttengineer for resolution. mm entrytower. with going Further inspection will be scheduled as discussed. c' 0 r 0 Preliminary Inspection M 0 INSPECTOR: Tom Cain Ze Z M REVIEWED BY: M a sha, P.E. cc:::Bldg Dept -City of Edmonds, John Salinas.John Salinas Construction Evereff Office 917-134 Stree[SW MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, WC. th Suite A-1 Everett, WA 98204 ph 425.742.9360 fax 425.745.1737 IMTE No.: E3051 Tacoma Office 10029 S. Tacoma Way Project: SALINAS RESIDENCE Suite ET2 Address: 2020292 it Avenue W, Edmonds, WA Tacoma, WA 911499 Permit 2002-0597 (City of Edmonds) ph 253,584.3720 fax 253.584,3707 Owner: John Salinas Construction Portland Office 7911 NE 33rd Drive Architect: Waite Architects 190 Z 01 sulle Engineer: Canfield Portland, OR 97211 ph 5D3.281,7515 Contractor: John Salinas Construction fax 503.281.7579 Page I Date: 2/27/03 m VVeather: Clear 0 801, Inspection: Structural Steel Welding C: M, Onsite for structural steel/welding inspection, Talked to project superintenclent, Jim M. (Cascade M Testing), regarding work inspected to date. Owner has elected to have MTE complete to c: — Z, inspections. At time of inspection, welders have fit up and begun welding high level roof frame for TS frames below. Reviewed fit work, electrode storage, and inspection > E: :0 entry tower and -up 4 details with welders. Reviewed anticipated inspection requirements with Jim. 0 -n ;a Noted some minor discrepancies between connection details being utilized and those on the In In plans. Also, there is some question as to member size and details for some connection S at the t3 T ca, entrytower. Discussed this with Jim, and he is going to contact architect/engineer for resolution. sm Further inspection will be scheduled as discussed. C Preliminary Inspection Cain 10 a :tl INSPECTOR: Tom Z M REVIEWED BY: Mark 6,_QrAlusha, P.E. cc:Bldg Dept -City of Edmonds, John Salinas -John Salinas Construction CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. / ENGINEERS 13 51A TESTING & INSPECTION PREVIOUS 12919 N.E. 126TH P�Cl REPORT No___� N.. KIRKI.ANO' �SHINOTCNN 9603. (4251823-9800 EVERETT (425)259.0817 OKE 4 FIELD REPORT P`9�% v r) LOCATION TO. OWNER WEATHER TEMF, AT AM OEM— PM ENGINEER ICR—OHITECT ATrN: CONTRACTOR INSPECTION PERFORMED (3) ITEMS INSPECTED — FOUNDATIONS RESTEELICONCRETE RES.TdL ONLY — FOOTINGS — SLAB RESTEELIMASONRY 1I.T...ELMN. — AUGER CAST PILES — COLUMNS OTHER STRATIBOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS I — BEAMS (4) LOCATION,I(EAS) &NCRETEJMASONRY MIX NO, DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SLUMP(INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CO��T SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. 2� <ES —NO —ITEMS INSPECTEDWERE IN CONFORMANCEWITH BLDG, DEPT, APPROVED PLA.NS % TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED. THIS REPORT SHALL NOT T NAME(S) PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL' WITH' OUT THE WRITIEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESnNG LABOFtATORY, INC. 7INSPECTOR(S), INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED am SIGNED BY —4� COPIES TO: ge/ I C � 4 IT, V m C rn 0� 0 C m m z I 0 —1 C z m M DO—) 0 0 Fn m 0 z z 0 m TESTING LABORATORY, INC. =CASCADE TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS PREVIOUS 12". NX. 1.61. PLACE 0�1 REPORT N�. No._11353t3' KIR—NO, WASHINGTON 98034 (425) 823-9800 -E..- (425) 259-0817 lc� FIELD REPORT Iry IL aa rZ8202 q'Z'�-v L3 ZAWV� Tel SLOG. PERMIT NO. OWNER 2m2 ol:� ll�_l WEATHER TEMP. AT AM AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT ATTN: (4 (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITE MSINSPECTED — FOUNDATION$ RESTEELICONCRETE —P. 15TEI.NLY — FOOTINGS — SLAB — RESTEELIMASONRY STRST'W.U..N. — AUGER CAST PILES — COLUMNS —OTHER STR.STIBOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALL$ — BEAMS (4) LOCATION (AREAJ� NOS RbNCRETEIMASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SLUMP (INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT I%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. —YES —NO ZITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCEWITH BLDG, DEPT. APPROVED PLANS TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED. THIS REPORr SK4LL NOT INSPECTOR(S), NAME(S) PRINTED SE REPR DUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITH OUT THE WRITMN APPROV� OF CASCADE TESTNO LABORATORY. INC. INSPECTOR SIGNMATURE - REIASEO 1100 SIGNED BY COPIESTO: 942 z IT! a MID 0 oc A M z ,0-4 0 m m 0 0 0 C c M 0 z z 0 m CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. RS nlllli� I I TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGI PREVIOUS 12.19 N.E. i26YH PLACE REPORT No I J- XJ�XLAND, —HINGTON 98034 (425) 8 3-9800 M=J] �e ET'T (425) 259-0817 DATE/ _ 7 OT FIELD REPOR PR0SCLk,ir\4 LOCATION lot 2-lo'Zb?— aLue. PERMIT NO. OWNER 200?- OS7 9� 1 WEATHER TEMP. AT AM AT PM ENGINEER AMATTECT ATTN: CONTRACTOR (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED 43) TTEMSINSPECTED FOUNDATIONS RESTEELICONCRETE RWEEL ONLY — FOOTINGS SLAB — RESTEELIMASONRY ��/.-STIWELDING — AUGER CAST PILES COLUMNS OTHER STRSTIBOLTING — DRILLED PIERS WALLS BEAMS (4) LOCATION (AREAS) &NCRETFJMA$ONRY MIX NO, DESIGN STRENGTH (fe) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YO. PLACED SLUMP (INCHESI SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT(%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO, —YES —NO —ITEMS INSPECTEDWERE IN CONFORMANCE WIT14 BLDG. DEPT.APPROVED PLANS FIEOr, 3,11yk MARKS: req -k \j kc,) TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED. THIS REPORT SHAUL HOT INSPECTORP. NAM Be REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE INSPECTOR SIGNATURE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REIASED SM SIGNED BY COPIES TO: z 0 0 M 0 80 a m m 0 -n IT m 0 0 0 z -4 om oe/06/02 15�3 . 4 P. 5CWS I 1U--10-2M2 12:03 CITY CF UMNDS 425-,7'.022" CITY OF EDIVIONDS SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT The project at 0a0a q2/10AV6, W. a#U)0�4J5V0—i4n1d UL64 building __reqwm &C Chap%ar 17 Is PtrMit number -stin Ver mid WAC Ainendmer" 1 02, The complete list of speolaffropectiona to intsch to this documatit. HEFORt A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED' The owner and contractor and %ati a] inspector &hall complote, two afecinent and the attached 11tructirdl W91(s) And InsPWfi0W 9 e 14 including the , C required acknow ediprisrus. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL INSPECTORSt Both special Inypeptor shall be approved by the Building Official prior to duties or,inspzetions. Eich special inspector ithill subruit Statement of us'lific ions to the mi ding Official for review. Special Wupectors lhisii-,divlw�l Identification p nuin to �% , 1001al innions on 9 iia, Special inspection and testing shall M thominimunircquiramcnesofucRop, l7andthe Ilowffir. A. pudund I R 1. Observe Work ito work far confOrman,06 Witll th an* coo approved "'a" 0 arvo t "'o work in c b"' wor�-sn p pro Road and a` d 1 isy �itiin y 'pe"' 4 "'po" 0 a a'h a an' r. hog- oc� us t It p att "cons -a I I to ad I k I in ��fal In . be we by the C .1 1'! sit _'or its . h p 'tlom' if h-S 1 41 6 to cer or ey y pill awed 4 Pproya b 2. Re arrNoo-coalormin Items Thp a special inspector 5,111 bring nougonfon:nin itools to that Immediale attention of the contractor and note nth items in the daily Bali report. Any mn riot resolvad in a timely mariner shall be Immediate caus of the special inspoclor to notify thv Building Officlal ofthe plandeviation etrair,chtingoor mission, It shall strobe the duty oftho special impactor to promptly noil� the enlineor or , tot 3. C.snplote Daily Roparta Each Mcfal impactor shall complete and s�gn both the special inspection record and the ditily report for for each day's Tgose records shall rew;Wn at the jobeitowith the 4. Furnish WeaWy Reports The special inspector or iWection agency shall fumish the City with weekl� re;.Oru of tests mid impecturai. Tlia tjoject eneincer or architect and odicri so dosigna ad mhall' &!to be copied an reporu. Wee, ly reports must ingludo the Following! ID46ii tion of daily inspectiorva and tests made with applicable locations List 171all nonmf�rmlng items Report on statua oftionciin*rmin turrio Ived or,unresolved C ,%elo 2 Wed. ItAtized changes authorized by 0 Are ito;I. Engineer and itY If not i1101 in nonconformance iwitne Furnish Final Conottracdon Report w ans. U.-bl. w 'u"tIo' 'and It, 2.0- s rh pec"On The a b-I P1 *a P _ st -.111 It of bi in p e I,— .r on 1. report. 4 ell ziuhi q u h. Pa. y Td WV0z:90 ZWE so '6"�V ZOM-228-0t7 : 'ON Xdzi :Rom scws 77, on 1 C I TY OF EDMM'05 AND TR$MG SCHEDULS brawAL imbeEmION ZIL RZWORMD CQNCRM, GUN= GROtrs AIM MORTARs &TRljqrURAL STEWWROING1 $Mo. ad To Ow wdm "94" W-0 cdnwm NVA Tim 0 Flow ulvm* 6,wud- 08b" z Im 0 Mm, Dk wwiq U.Mw- I "T" . — MAO swi AQ41 =; -5 , [� pRECASTIPRUTRFMWCONCUTZI — - co*wit kwwdiAl lupwot 55 a rn, pft rw.Tm- ft�T4 CIA4 FiRiPROOTINGi c m Fw4mm h-mugo 0 DoOl Tm -4 K ubal M, R*fwt� Ask I p1sem INSLIATiNG CONCRET91 C > C— cow"Wrimm r- Fl ,omd-sperjon 0 -n FILI-MATRIUAL, M m MASONAY., 0 lk"Olo. smin Uw o P1,11.-Y A-P�- T-115 (Mil-7 U0111, WO NM1 MUCTURALWOOD; hwo UU rd") Shur WIll fUlliq INW.U" ODMONALINSTRUCTIONSORMER TIM AINDINSnCTIONS, Z z 0 m 2TOF 60 '"tj 'ON XIJ3 P. 4 i-*-3t-2?02 12104 CIT'Y OF vmql)s B--jCwMajely tetle tspecalrd �Uspictar is ready fbr special 1. Notl tar to no* the special inspeotor whm work It to the duty Of the rcnU- schedule L%d as noted on the approved inspection. Note, the item a listed on tba ttacbei Are required to bave SPI ,Ikl Lospecticw. Adequate notice shall be the plans and spCeificationg actor hu tisne to becorne familiar wi'h by thlb cOntmtO* So that the; sptclga inwp PT.vlded project. Z, 2. provide MCGO to Approved Pleas edal inspector access to aPPTQv0d Plene 9% e contractor is responsible for providing the sp 0 jobsite. 1. lwala Special tn"ction Records beite all Vecial in oction Tbc contractor is m onsiblo to retain 4% ee IN 10 the CiTy building a)spwor upon These records we to ca a by the sptclol ittep" or. m request. ma -4 0 0C 1,linspee morimpectIMAVOCIES 00%ots and spedul inspection 1. Ag rove STtc shall approve all special Inalp a buil its 49PU=Cnt C, -4 Z. Monitor special Inspection and approve wetidy reports 'at Insyecton shall be na the 'wformanoG of Wol be obtBkv4 prior to ,PW f approval must epcefts' B".Ildi. or. C — P Z 5i by y inspector, placement ofoollerole or other gjnilgr kotivitisi In addition to that ofts special 0 "n 3. Issue Certificate of 0ecupattoy occupancy &ftar all weekly WOW inlPal:tiOn 7 he Buildin mk&�'. Issue a Cer"'Cotc 01 ittcd end accepted. ins the ftn& report have boon subm m m a Vj 0 rep rt3 itclu 1%0111681 0 The "t oymor or the engineer of rolitoot of rboDrd acting as the C*Tor's agent shall fund "InspeCiOn C M 0 011 11MV1008- or architect a! wrowd ftabau =iz6IUd&�s11.cjAj jn6p@obgA requirements on the plans end onsincor specifications. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS andagrett 10 ea*rm1PXYwi1h the forms and condftlon$ ofthis ag"mehf. V; z 0 Own et;ir. m ate pec" Specia r. pcctcr 04vetplContracto ate City Building OM9�i T-ITPL 4 'ON XUJ Height Calculation Worksheet Address: r?Cd od- Date: -4—S ITISP 1. Datum Point: z -4 2. Datum Point Elevation: rp" 3. Average &ad.: :YLo 83 4. Maximum Elevation Allowed: ��(P&&(average grade) + 25' CM: O�, 5. Reference Point Elevation Shot to House: 0 � C!, In M. ., , 3U4. aturn elevation)+ -CY1 (grade to transft.level line shot to house)= 56C), 6. Measurements from line shot onto house to roof ridge: to 0 M, rn:, 0 0 Z� z 0� -4 Total Q) 7. Actual Elevation: I (reference point elevation) + -1 V '3(95 (measurements from #6) = 79 1, 57 Conclusion: (actual) is gn Deter /6e._s!_d_h J"91 (allowed); therefore the house is/ -AECDC 16.20.30 requirements is not over the height requireme.Tper L.,\TEW\j3UMDlNGWSC\ffeight Calculation Workshee.doc Of ED �p -11U811110E TO PERMITTEE AND/OR OWNER DO NOT RE, MOVE PARTIAL APPROVAL CORRECTON REQUIRED Q ENFORCEMENT VIOLATION Owner S19 4- AZ4.2 Permit Number.. a L'90 Z Job Addres--2 Site Contact �;-fWORK DESCRIBED BELOW HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND IS APPROVED APPROVED PLANS AND JOB CARD MUST BE AVAILABLE TO INSPECTOR ON SITE In CORRECTIONS LISTED BELOW MUST BE MADE: BEFORE WORK CAN BE APPROVED AND/OR THE NEXT PHASE C ma 0 OF WORK IS STARTED -q 0 0 C D RECALL FOR INSPECTION $45 REINSPECTION FEE MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO INSPECTION RrQuEsT m mz STOP WORK -UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE BY CITY INSPECTOR 10-4 NO PERmrr.sTop WORK -REMOVE CONSTRUCTION OR OBTAIN PERMIT AND MAKE WORK COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES 0 -n -n m T 0 0 a Cn 3: Co 57 [710 z ;u z The initials RSR are Rick S. ca Roberts, a temporary contract z inspector for the City. m THE ACTIONS OR CORRECTIONS INDICATED ABOVE ARE REQUIRED TO BE CORRECTED WITIIIN ---_-.�CALENDAR DAYS OR PENALTIES MAY BE APPLIED. FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220 )(Building 0 Planning L1 Engineering El Fire 13 Public Works Inspector ______Date White: Pemit File Pink: Enforcement Buff- Applicant .1 FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM TO:_ DATE:_ MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION FROM: —FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE— PLL N ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE—SJ4211-15 PLANNING DIVISION DATE— PROJECT 3alifid S z 0 0 SITE ADDRESS M C M 0 C PERMIT #__Iod ADB# INSPECTED K X M M Z DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED 2 -approved plans. Final app ova A field, inspection was conducted to determine compliance with r I C) denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of 0 -n n� PERFORMANCE BgNDS and the granting of: x M M 0 0 GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL 0 M C CD 9 co M Z 0 GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED z 0 Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector I z FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES 0 M 0 Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inpector 2. 3. RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISS I UES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL Date Signature 1:temp:b1dg:fbnus:ocaprv1 3/25/04 RECORD OF INSPECTIONS. INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED SETBACKS ......... . .... FOUNDATION: MQ, Footing...................... Wall......................... Pier/Porch ................. z Retaining Wall ........... -71 Slab Insulation .......... PL UNISING: Underground ............. 0 3: ITI c: MRough -in ................... 0 0 Commercial Final HEATING: ITI ITI z -1k? Gas Test 4M > Gas Piping ................. E: Equipment ................. 0 0 U Commercial Final Cz MITI EXTERIOR SHEATHING D'-3 0 C0 0 NAILING _ ................ ... LC ;-�- f; FRAMING ........................ C 0 K CO) 4N- M 0 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING.. 0 _-L -8 - _13 VPSULATION ................ eFloor Insulation Val' Insulation ........... z 0 Calling insulation U5 SHEETROCK NAILING v-� 0 000 SPECIAL INSPECTION ITI MISCELLANEOUS .......... FINAL APPROVAL FOR MIS OCCUPANCY ................ ell, Side Sewer 2.25,00 jj( AmoutPhId$ Reccip" ires Datelssucd Ott Size Watermeter LJ k4A- -\-V �Jld DateftrChased I _X�03 row # vv�r"Axj nount Paid $�Recclpt