20030848.pdfDATE RECEIVED
9z
PERMIT EXPIRES
-7
CITY OF EDMONDS
4E PERMIT
NUMBER
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS
r.'!-",ME OM,/ ,
Z;W
& -
se/OWN
/
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO, LOT NO. LID NO.
MAILING ADDESS
LID FEE S
TESCP Apr
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP RW ,ad
P.rffM F=
'CIP ITELEPHON E
A
Street Use Formh Raced
EXISTING — PROPOSED Inspeeflon Requked
SklewrAR squired
DEDICATION— FT Underground
20 z
2z'p 6,21
REQUIRED 1 vvmg required 13
NAME
METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES RV REQUIRED
YEPs 13 NO C3
z
ADDRESS
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
e_
NAME CBL#
f 4= 1010 f
ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE
C) 55M
ULA
FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
cc
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
VARIANCE OR ICU SHORELINE OR ADS# INSPECTION BOND
REQ'D POSTED
113YEsXNo Is
Lq a LDY
BEIRA REVIEW SIGN AREA , HEIGHT
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT. PARCEL NO.
COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED
31-7 MO 003 cool
EXP CVA V
NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH
LOT COVERAGE a REQUIRM0 SETBACKS ??T) PROPOSED SETBACKS(tfT.)
ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/RSIDE REAR
COMPLIANCE OR
13 ADDITION COMMERCIAL
t e I
5 �x ;41.0- ;?� 10' 15 /V-.O ch
z
CHANGE OF USE
1 1
0 REMODEL muLnFAmwy SIGN
FIARKING IV LOT AREA PLANNING REV] D BY DATE
REOD PROVIDED
GRADING [3 FENCE
REPAIR 1-3 CYDS x FT)
REMARKS
0 DEMOLISH TANK
og
[3 GARAGE RETAINING WALL
0 FIRE
CARPORT ROCKERY ALARM
(TYPE OF US INES OR ACIMM EXPLA h"
A
CHECKED BY OF -CONSTRUCTION OCCUPANT
.
_j*
ITYPE
GROUP
NUMBER NUMBER OF AL
R 40tT
I
OF DWELLING AREAS o
0 JAREA OCCUPANT
SPECIA L INSPECTI N
LOAD
UMBI
STORIES NUMBER
REQUIRED YES
9
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE'P:
.
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 1108/FINAL INSPECTION REG'O 9
— 2—"- Is
$ 01 19
rz=1 I
Description
FEE /Description FEE
Plan Check
State Surcharge
HEAT SqYRCE GLAZING % LOT 87PE %- /
101/10
Building Permit
eclLi City Surcharge
PLAN CHCC"O- VESTED DATE -
�9�_ —
Plumbing
N-L
im '��z I
Mechanical
THIS PERMIT AUTHORCM8 ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
t BE INE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
a
Grading
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
t: SEPARATE PERMISSION.
211
Engr. Review
5 PERMITAPPLICATION: ISO DAYS
CL PERMIT UMM I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
Engr. Inspection
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESCIRS
Fire Review
Plan Chk. Deposit
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
Fire Inspection
Receipt #
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFY. WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
Landscapelnsp.
Total Amt. Due I OtdR
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION."
Recording Fee
Receipt # AIVA
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
This application Is not a permit until signed by the
TION. AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building 0111clal or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR/QODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION receipt Is acknowledged In space provided.
W094MEN'S COMPENSATION PqURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
0�f SIG QAT
U,
SI�ItAE AG DATE IGNED/
IA95)
%-We-
jtj� 'z
771-0220
me=
R-ELE SE-D DAU
ATitEN*hdN
Off 1333
10 I_31 /40-3
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
;W1 A FIL - �IELLCIV/INSPE&Fl
ZiR
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
PINK - GOLD - ASSESSOR
04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN - ACCOUNTING
z
0
5
M
M
C
M
0
-40
0 C
M
10
0
In
MIT!
rn
C
C9
0
z
0
M
Af
S89006'00"E
C-4 IA-0.5
z
cz
7pi
X
CHAINLINK
CENCE
VOP
w
A-ir
A-8t
A 9�
J
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical I Civil Engineer
re Is , L q*o
�,20(03
Mr. Gary Stebbins
iij
16220 Main St.
Bellevue, WA 98008
Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation I Foundatio n StaWilization
1121 Brooknvem Dr., Ed monds,, WA
This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation
w:
Of the Stebbins residence and property at 1121 Bro okmere Dr., Edmonds WA.
"Ffl 4
This evaluation was required due to homeowner concerns regard ingfoundation
settlement and desire to stabilize I repair foundations.
REFgRENCE S:
-5,
20(2- visual g ment by AES, Inc.
March 13, eotechnical assess
r
March 18, 2002 inspections report by Pioli Engineers
Site photog raphs by D. Bruce, P.E. dated March 8, 2W3
ga:
Property map with topography (b y owner)
BACKGROUND:
The Stebbins residence is located on an irregular shaped lot that contains
a relatively flat portion (off Brookmere Dr.) and a sloping section (approxim ately
21-1: IV) that extends down slope to a localized pond. See map and photographs.
The re sidence has sustained significant historic foundatio n cracking and
along the slope "break point" approximately m idway along the house
settlement
foundation.
The foundation cracking and settlements follow the natura I ground slope.
Refer to March 13, and 18, 2002 engineer reports for detailed description of
foundation cracking and settlements.
EVA UATION:
The experienced foundation cracking and settlements of the residence are
typical of similar aged homes on similarly sloped lots in the Puget S ound area.
CITY CAMY
SOILS FOUNDATIONS SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION DRAINAGE - DESIGN PERMIT - LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 Shoreline, Washington 98155 (206)546-9217 FAX546-8442
compactecl native su"raae Soils eaSily CaPaL)Jt:J Ot F)J UVJUJJ 19 IMALoV1101 IL
otings. Unfortunately, during the original
foundation support for standard fo
rd portion of the house was not
construction of the residence, the westwa
-grade soils.
sufficiently founded in these dense sub
The settlement amounts vary with location throughout the house.
Typically, the western (down slope) portion of the residence has settled an
average of 5 to 7 inches.,
STABILIZATION:
The Stebbins residence requires stabilization. Without proper
stabilization, the foundation settlements will worsen beyond the point of rescue
and repair.
The technique of Made
j3al:nning withp:IvI:piIes; is recommended, based
on similar successful stabilization projects in the area.
0.
A series of 2 inch diameter galvanized steaell pin -piles shall be driven to
refusal depths (Refusal depths are determined by onsille geotechnical
engineering inspection. Typically, refusal is defined as less than 1 inch
penetration per minute of full driving effort, 90 pound jackhammer minimum).
U S r::' :3" q6 711-IFS,
The attached design sketch provides a base plan for approximately4wa LT
in rmined by AM
p -piles. The actual number and location of pin -piles will be dete &
onsite geotechnical inspections.
I L CR
will be in h structur*tracke/s t9Ahe
st
TP6=riVbf the pin -pi al wit
existing, foundation s m wall. Some n-piles will be ifstalledkithtpile
rednor
ca rovid pport for i or posts.
p NEW IF0UtJth-h7r(0IJ 6'57E-
tionally tV engineeonticipa;K between 3 a?&6 fie bp&ereqL0ed
to provf/*e horizontprlateral s4port.
The proper installation of pin -piles and subsequent foundation "lock irf
should be. performed by a qualified experienced contractor. After proper
installation of all pin -piles, some house leveling shall occur. This engineer
anticipates that a majority of the experienced settlements can be reclaimed.
Onsite geotechnical inspections, in conjunction with a qualified experienced pile
contractor shall determine the specific amount of foundation leveling.
SIOR2:
As previously discussed,. significant historic erosional degradation has
occurred along the slope (below the house, and above the lower pond).
Additionally, this engineer observed rodent holes that have undermined the
slope.
Without proper slope stabilization, ongoing erosion in conjunction with
animal activity will "eat away" at the current slope configuration. Eventually,
slides and sloughing will result in excess siltation of the pond as well as property
loss and exposure of the Stebbins foundations. This engineer recommends
installing a pipe pile stabilization wall with tie backs along the current top of slope
location. See attached typical sketch.
All of the proposed underpinning work and slope stabilization work will
occur Wi.%Nn prop" lines. This stabilization work will have no detrimental
impacts to -adjoining properties or residences.
This engineer anticipates that refusal depths will be achieved within 20
feet below existing grade.
PERMITS:
Obtaining appropriate City of Ed.rnonds permit is the responsibility of
property owner.
zo
I