20040244A.pdf0
DATE RECEIVED
ERMIT EXPIRES
FP
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
—T—
CA iiiii te,,
MAILING ADDRESS ii!5owr If
CIO I
----- ------- AV cw g c
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
r
i5M" 5-
NAME
L)
W
7RESS
I CITY
ZIP
TELEPHONE
NAME CBL #; `,`2
Pelj-014 111je-
ADDRESS
po go
CIB �t I U� k zip
STATE LICENSE NUMBER
0, 0/io
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
TELEPHONE
-30 cin
0-1
El
NEW
"v�<ESIDENTIAL
ADDITION
COMMERCIAL
REMODEL
MULTIFAMILY
REPAIR
GRADING CYOS
)5k �EMOLISH
TANK
EiGARAGE
rARPORT
RETAININGWALL
ROCKERY
(TYPE OF,U2E. BUS!WSS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN
L)
U)
La NUMBER NUMBER OF
OF DWELLING
03
o STORIES 2� UNITS
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
1)
15
0910le
PLUMBING / MECH
COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF USE
SIGN
F
FENCE
( X FT�
OTHER
FIRE SPRINKLER
FIRE ALARM
,5'r/—_7
CRITICAL
AREAS
NUMBER 104
USE PERMIT
ZONE uz
7
NUMBER 4
JOB SUITEIAPT#
ADDRESS It'll
k I
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO
LID FEE $
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY FIER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
IESCP Approved 13
RW Permit Required E3
Street Use Permit Roq'd E3
EXISTING - PROPOSED
Inspection Herimrod 13
sidewalk Required E3
REQUIRED DEDICATION- FT
Undotgrotind
Wiring requ,iod
METER SIZE
I I
LINE SIZE
NO� OF FIXTURES
I
PRV REQUIRED
YES 13 NO 13
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTHACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE
VA;;-6- < - S t f 1---,
A&u V�V_ gw�(6,10
ENGINE E RlVq.AEVI EWE D BY
FIRE REVIEWED BY
DATE
VARIANCE OR CU
SHORELINEORADB11
INSPECTION I
BOND
REO'D .,f
I
POSTED
OYES 2<0
IS `
SEPA REVIEW
SIGN AREA
HEIGHT
COMPLETE EXEMPT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
ALLOWED PROPOSED
EXP I .--
I ID
1`4A
,
LOT COVERAGE
REQUIRED SETBACKS (Fr.)
PROPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.)
ALLOWED PROPOSED
FRONT SIDE REAR
FRONT LIR SIDE REAR
aA
I
I 'JiVA
PARKING
LOT AREA
PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
REO'D PROVIDED
I
REMARKS
CHECKED BY TYPE OF :OPSTRUCJION
SPECIAL INSPECTION
REQUIRED [] YES
OCCUPANT
GROUP
OCCUPANT
LOAD
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 1 08/FINAL INSPECTION RECIID
VALUATION
Description FEE Description FEE
Plan Check State Surcharge
HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % Building Permit 0 City Surcharge
PLAN CHECK NO: 19 VESTED DATE Plumbing Base Fee
Mechanical
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
t= BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
2 Engr. Review
cc PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
Lu —
IL PERMIT LIMIT. I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection '50
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION .....
cn 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit
13 IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt #
tr
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIREC1 LY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT HE a,
0 DEEMED TO MODIFY. WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscapeinsp. Total Amt. Due
-A -
XO NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY 10 ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION..
Recording Fee Receipt #
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STAlE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a perrnil until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORI;ED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Olficial or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATlONj`OF THE LABOR CODE�,Py THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKYN'S,ZOMPENSATI AND R2 18 27. CIALS SIGI JURE DATE
Pf _E
OFFI 3
SlG1f(*A'TU )WN IR E DATE 'IGNED (425) 1114 hloy
�m lc. )UP+
771 -0220
RELEAS DATE
ro 11W
I I f .1 � I
ATTENTIOW EXT 1333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- OFt1qI4AL - FILE YELLOW - IN'SPECTOR
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK -OWNER GOLD,ASSESSOR
09/03 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES
cc
ul
z
z
G
z
w
ul
Ir
rZ
0
LE
z
z
5
(L
M
M
z
0
M
=i __9
C/)
M
M
0
0
0 C
M
M Z
ID
C
0 _n
n
M M
0 U5
0 r.
0 M
C C/)
9 Cn
M 0
Z
z
W
z
0
i
F5
M
Mar 12 04 12:03p COODORS INC. 3GO-897-0967 P.2
c 0 y riECEIVEE)
CIT
MAR 2 6 2004
PERMIT/COUNTER
cA,
NOTE -ID
APPHOVED AS
ILI 13" ENG NEERING
s,�
Dat
APPFIOVED BY PLANNI \IG
VAC
5 (L
To
rJ T72-0 L,
-iDwJ Lo FF (�4
150 LiT4
Z
0
0
m
=i `9 1
0
CONDOR, INC. 360-897-0967 p.2
Feb 12 04 02:4 P. 2/2
JRN 21 '04 07:50AM FROM WDFW MI.LLCREEK
state of Washington
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
Rc91oM4 Office: laoie Mili creek Boulm/ard - MiR Creek, Washington 98012 - (425)775-1311
January 21, 2004
City of Edmonds
1215"' Ave, North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Deur Dcvelopment Services:
SUBJECT., Request for Concurrence; Shed Demolition, NW 114, Section 25, Township
27 North, Range 03 East, Snohomish County
This letter is being written at t1w request of Todd Gendw-of Condor h1c. As the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) understands, Condor Inc. has been contracted by lean
Loll- to demoli.sh and remove a dilapidated shed from the above referenced property. The
WDFW also understands that the shed is not in the vicinity of any designated waters of the state,
and tile activities involved in demolishing and removing the shed wil I not impact any designated
Therefore, tile WDFW will not require a Hydraulic Project Approval be
waters of the state.
obtained -for this work.
-tunity to provide this information, If you have any qucstions, please
Thank you for the oppoi
contact me at (425)379-2305
Sincerely,
2-'ric D. Pentico
Area Habitat Biologist
oNopwr
EDI):edp
RECF-IVSD
FEB 1212004
PERMIT COUNTEW
Mar 24 04 10:44a
CONDOR, INC.
360-897-0967
p.2
Case No.
PUGUT SOUND CLEAN AIR
%Date c6v6d
Agency
AGENCY
110 Union Street. Suite 5W
77
Stmtdc, WA 98101-2039
200400353
www.pscleanainorg
i 'Filgi Jk1M
!, s.:,.
NOTICE OF INTENT
A.ProieetType: 1. E3 Friable Asbesto
�2F�riable Asbestm Removal & Demolrition 3.
ion .0n1V
Demoht�io
B.
Phone: 40-3FE
7-74-
Property O%vner-. �
[Mail L7DI
A7,!QV'1t;9_
S 19 Vt_1_
citv: 1�6mao SI-0-
1�6 F1,7
INA
7in-
9 Address:
P
C. Asbestos /LzJaFPR/,%]
I I E17: iii
rL - 7 L48FL
!iE10LoJ1AL:7L7V,,.0
Jj 7LLfiL 11A,11NL71,XVZ11�1G"48EL 0wncr/CEO:
Contrite or:
Contractor
11-N
f
7mi-ou)
Pholle.
Phone:
No.:
Mailing Address:
E:Job
Zin: Fax:
D. Site zip-
ddress:
A - 411;
Site
Manager: Jltqq.� 9pL7W L 4qn[ c) FLocal Phone:
LJ 2Wo1.A5t)CS10!V . Was Friable Asbestos Identified?
E. 6 Asbestos Survey or I No. of Dyes WC
S
_s e Was Nonfriable Asbestos Identified.
M2t,l
M2t1I Presumed I Surve
Structures: Attach a capj- of (he surv-n- whenfriable asbestos
AREZPulle Ing Certifica o -/
,A Build' 16- Exp. Da ti. n # ;7 has not been identified.
Inspector. 6 Exp. r
ector_
An AHERA Survc�t, Lv requfred hefnre a// demniman prqiecls
In TrIdirking Firu (List Fire DepL)
F. Demolition Start of ___T2. Ll Ordered Demolition (attach copy of 006e�
Information: Date: or c- (--tvr- Structures:
rn;r � ! hudS�(
Demolition vert dmolifiOnrnntractors r1runing toddrets an hud. Will nonfriable asbestos be left in place during demo? LJ Ws/0 No
Contractor: if yes, Ust type and qty.
N C�,
Work Days: M T W Th F Sa Su
G. Friiable Asbestos
o.
Pro*ect Information: Start Date: Completion Date: I` Hours:
Will all friable asbestos El Yes
�t� to
Lincu Ft. Squavre Ft. materials be removed? El No
Total Oty. to be Removed*.
Bo Jer\Fuma �u =�e �sulat3on impr flng
Boiler\Fumace Lnsulation LJ Duct Insulation Pipe Lnsulabon Ll Fimproofing U paints Ll Plaster Textured Coatings
I P Pe na a g 001 rial Other
LJ Cement Board LJ cemen Friable Floorning F�nablc Ro,ofing M7�atcn
H. Ashe-stosfDernolition Project Categories:
NotifiC21tion Period
'c
project Demolition
urchnr2c
L Single-Fiimily Residence (owner -occupied):
A. No tice
A. �Q�bestos Removal Project Only
Project (with without asbestos removal proj ect)
:Prior
B. 10 Days*
B 1 9
B,V_J emolition. or
0 �(A - &%_7il can begin *6pon_n'&1ificiti6-. demolition Must wait 10 days 'L . -
�_ �__ 0 -ill he using the res
gb�cst�s rem idence as their domicile, the above boxes
has been or it I
Note.. �_Ihesin.rvlefaniil.v residence is otvned by onefarnil.v who
,,r 1B may le. checked. I cupied midence, one of the caregorie-i lkvied below mast be
IA f this is not an owner-oc
used. .4 singlefiamily
r ;ide d 1; not ro ern-, mulli-fantill. units, or am, niLred-use buildi?
C., 4. oe, include reirtal
or
r1c,
g.
S200
2. All Other emolitions with no Asbestos removal or NonfTi able Asbestos
A h _r D
0'
10 Days
oniv
Fnriabir chrrtnr Prq: n Single Family Residence):
e -4
E10
F4.
Asbestos Demo
sloo
3. �: - 259 linear feet and/or 2: 48 - 159 square fact of asbestos
Prior Notice 10 Days
_�.�100
0 SIDO
260-999 - linear feet and/or 160 - 4,999 souare feet of asbestas
0 999 li
10 Days
$-so $250
5. LJ > I moo linear feet and/or >5,000 square feet of asbestos
10 Days
Twice Project Fee
6-0 Emergency Asbestos P12rojrr, or Ll Emergency Demolition Project
Prior Notice
F,. �cv fr -Amers must pruv We a
..I- rAL;I. P M r�_ c. h0wvvt1. pTopcny 0
IATOICD a=r1;cDcy request)
-c omp C.
C cm. oLirIcaliott & supplcmtmud data is, to the best or my knowiccig , accum
�31 the U.-nut on ed in Zthi
0 We
ature
777' --- T-i
Putict sound Clea/Air AgenLy FonD No.: 66-160 (Revised 1/04) TS
I nV60 00
AMOUNT_�
CK. NO. 71 'S S
RCPT. mo. �_ CP% JOT NJ
z
0
i
0
M
—i -n
0 rn
C:
M 0
0
10
0 C:
--I g
M M
M Z
JO
C
V)
o -n
n
M M
0
0
0 M
C/)
(n
M 0
Z
X
>
z
0)
z
0
i
0
M
Mar 09 04 04:05p CONDOR, INC. 360-897-0967 p.3
Asbestos Survey
901 6th Ave S
Edmonds WA 98020
Z'
0
M
0
M
to locate and Identify
M 0
suspe cted asbestos containing building materials
O�
0 C:.
M
Inspected on September 19, 2003
M Z
:> Z
-4
r
Cn
0 -n
mm,
prepared for
0 6
0 r
Jean Loff
0 M
C Cn
901 6th Ave S
r. Cn
Q0
Edmonds WA 98020
Z
(425) 774-8042
W
-tPY
CITY Cdx_p
Z
Z
0
by AHERA accredited building inspector
M
Bill Schroeder, of
Environmental Knowledge Organization, Inc.
2000 70th PINE
Marysville WA 98271
RECEIVED
MAR 2 6 2004
PERMIT COUNTER
Mar 09 04 04:05P CONDOR, INC. 3GO-897-0967 p.4
Survey
to locate and identify
Asbestos Containing Building Materials (ACBM's)
Property Chvner: Jean Loff
Subject property CarTiage House
901 6th Ave S
Edmonds WA 98020
Inspection date : September 19, 2003
.101-
901 6th Ave S
Edmonds WA 98020
(425) 774-8042
Submittedto: Same
Lab analysis by: EKO, Inc.
2000 70'h PINE
Marysville WA 98271
(360) 651-9390
vz)cz BqC93 wo,3 BOW WW pc)w B�)W W09 B%)C99 Weg toes WCZ Wos W(Z mxs Weg BOW WCZ .
EgMose
The above address Was inspected to locate asbestos in accordance with federal and state laws.
The sampling methods specified in 40 CFR 763.86, a sub -section of the Asbestos Hazards
Emergency Response Act (AHERA), were employed with the following specific purpose in mind:
Safety - Intended operations present the potential for disturbance of an ACBM. This
report was prepared to facilitate employee's safe performance of normal activities.
M Removal. Specifically this survey anticipates : h methods (i.e., -
Renovation. This may not include use of destructive searc
breaking into walls, etc.) unless expressly directed by client in writing.
Demolffion. Destructive search techniques are highly recommended and may
be implied by statutes which require identification of all suspected ACBM's prior
to demolition. [as in 40 CFR 763.85 (a)(4)(i)]
C3 Management. Information herein will be used by the property owner to develop an
appropriate Operations & Management (O&M) policy to reduce the likelihood of
exposure to building occupants for ACBM's which will be left in place.
E] Property Sale - Public buildings, including commercial and industrial facilities are
required to use an accredited inspector [see the Asbestos School Hazard Abatement
Reauthorization Act (ASHARA)]. Private buildings may be inspected to compliment an
appraisal.
M e _th o d s
Currently only persons having the AHERA Building Inspector training are considered acceptably
accredited by all governmental agencies.
Mandated AHERA procedures are:
• trai0ing (for the inspector)
• examining (materials which the inspector suspects)
• identify (by sampling or by assumi . ng material is an A CBM)
• assessing (friability, condition and potential for damage)
1%
Z
0
i
0
M
--i -n
m
C
M
0
0
0 C
M
M Z
C _Z
3:
o -n
n
i
3:9
M M
0
0 M
C Cn
9 Cn
Q 0
Z
X
>
Z
X
Cn
Z
0
M
Mar 09 04 04:06p CONDOR, INC. 360-897-0967 P.5
documenting (the above with locations)
Procedures for sample collection often seem complicated to the layperson. What appears to be the
same material located in different areas, may, or may not, require addiUonal samples, depending an
the usage of each area. Sprayed and troweled on materials require at least three tests to confirm
they are not ACBM. Differing quantities of suspect homogeneous materials also affect the number
of samples needed.
Analysis of samples must be done by an accredited laboratory.
Assessing friability is done per the EPA definition that the material can be crumbled to a powder
using hand pressure. The forces expected to act on any material cannot be anticipated by this
Inspector.
An accredited Asbestos Management Planner should be consulted for assessments of condition or
potential for disturbance.
Estimated quantities are given as a courtesy and should not be relied on for bid purposes. An
accredited Asbestos Proiect Designer is required for quantifying ACBM's.
The inspector who prepared this report hereby certifies by signature below, that
• has received training pursuant to 40 CFR Part 763, Sub -part E, Appendix C
• has had at least ten (10) years professional experience in the asbestos abatement field
• used his/her best efforts in locafing suspect ACBM's
1005580
Bill Schroeder Certification #
OR �_4 00
July 16, 2004
Expiration Date
ton
Certificate of Comptet'
ipiz i.5 to rertifp tT
. jait
Bill Schroeder
I)aE; gatigartorilp completeb
4 fjour!9 of rzfre0l)er trainingjo iin
Asbestos Building Inspector
tn mulpip uitb the trnining rcquirentenug o[
i&T_Z[ 79�jie 30 / 40 Cjr, 7G3 (GPer-,R)
rfificate Number 1005580
Date(s) of Training
Exam -lwrt:: N/A
Expiration Date, Jul 15,2001
-93119
L�jmitations I
Destructive methods Z were were not (check one) employed in cc le ting samples for
laboratory analysis.
Sampling location drawings are not to scale.
n
z
0
i
0
m
--I -n
M
a
0
0
0 C
--I K
X M
M Z
ID 4
C
X
o -n
m M
0
0
0 M
C cl)
9 Cn
.mo
Z
z
W
z
0
m
Mar 09 04 04:CGp CONDOR, INC. 360-897-0967 P-6
Samples are believed to be representative of similar materials found throughout the areas
inspected.
Reasonable discovery efforts were used in preparing this report. Standard industry pracUces
recognize that every square inch of a building cannot reasonably be exposed during the survey
process, especially in occupied structures. Wall interiors, underground pipes, septic tank liners,
every area under carpets or burn debri, are all examples of this. Consequently, some materials
may remain concealed which are not identified in this ireport. Materials not addressed in this
report should be assumed to contain asbestos unbl determined otherwise by an accredited
professional. The results of such analysis must be incorporated by addenda into this report prior to
disturbance of these materials. A copy of this report must remain onsite during such activities.
-This report can be expected to become outdated as regulations, building improvements and
Z
0
intended usage of this information may change over time.
Most demolition projects must submit this report with their "Notice of Intent to Remove or
M
Encapsulate Asbestos" form required by local air pollution agencies. Typically these are filed by the
95-
abatement or demolftion contractor. Permit filings are not included with preparation of this report.,
however, the permit forms may be attached herein.
0 M
m 0
0
Structures
0 C
rt two
A survey of 1 structure(s). occurred on the date listed in the head of this repo This is a
—`19
= M
story carriage house (or barn ?) which has no basement. The dimensions of this structure are
M Z
K) --I
approximately 20'x 25'.
C
Historical
Historical records El were were not (check one) examined for use in this survey. The building
0 -n
n
is believed to have been built In 1895.
X 9
M
M
0 5
General Notes
0 r-
0 m
Following is a description of the construction sys tems noted at the site.
co
Roofing - The entire roof is asphaltic 3-tab roof shingles which have no tar
Q 0
Z
paper or other vapor barrier.
X
Ceilings & walls, interior - All interior wall and ceiling su rfaces are unfinished wood only.
Wall surfaces, exterior - The exterior of this building is lapped wood materials only.
Z
Floors - All floors are covered using wood products.
Insulation, structural - No insulation was found in the attic, walls or floors in this
CD
Z
0
building.
--I
Heat sources - This building may have had a woodstove in the distant past, as
0
M
a chimney still exists, but currently no heat sources are
apparent.
Insulation, thermal system - No TSI's were found. Domestic water lines were also absent.
Glazing compounds - Windows are all wood framed and have glazing compounds
attached.
Wiring - Wiring is older cellulose sheathed materials.
Doors - Doors are wood only.
Adhesives - Adhesives were not found. Cove base was not found.
9
Mar 09 04 04:06p CONDOR, INC. 360-897-0967 p.7
Functional Spaces
Functional spaces are identified in order to determine a sampling plan which will be
repr I esentative of the materials found in areas of similar usage. The functional spaces identified at
this location have been deemed are (nominally):
I Indoors areas
0 Outdoor areas
Suspect Materials
,paterials commonly suspected to be ACBM's which were found during this inspection are
R Doors
E] Floor Coverings
F� Insulation, structural
0 Insulation, Thermal System
E] Mastic (adhesive)
Mortar or grout
Putty (or caulking)
Z Roofing
F� Sealants
F I Siding material
Fj Vapor barrier membrane
[:] Wall & ceiling finishes
F-1 Wiring insulation
Homogeneous Areas
Suspect materials are listed as shown below in order to determine the homogeneity of products
discovered. These are materials which are similar in age, color and texture. This property
contained the following materials which appeared homogeneous:
1 Glazing putty
2 Roof shingle
Findings
Asbestos containing materials WERE NOT discovered.
The following table summarizes suspect materials identified during this inspection.
Characterization of each material as surfacing, TSI or miscellaneous is made for the express
purpose of developing a sampling strategy and may not accurately reflect the product's designation
for abatement project design purposes.
ID
Type
5�1
FS
HA
Fri
Descripfion
Lorabon
ACBM
QtY
I a
I misc
02
G1 P^
Windows
N
I N1A
2a
Mmisc
0
JEEN
N
Roof shingle, green
All roof areas
Legend
Abbray Deronition
TS1 Thermal System Insulation
Surf Surfacing (troweled or sprayed on)
Misc Miscellaneous
AC13M Asbestos Containing Building Material
Abbre Definition
FS Functional Space
HA Homogenous area
Fri Friable
0 Assumed ACBM
N
Z
0
1
0
m
F�oject Card
001 61h Ave S,
Edmonds WA 98020
f Job#:
Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos Fibers
Client: Jean Loff Sampling date: 09-19-2003 10:00 Lab: EKO, Inc.
Address: 901 6th Ave S By: Bill Schroeder Address : 2000 70th PI NE
Edmonds WA 98020 Delivered by: Bill Schroeder - Marysville WA 98271
Phone -. (425) 774-8042 Date/tIme'. 09-19-2003 11;00 Phone: (360) 651-B300
Sampling Data
Specimen# Layer Material Location Description
1 a GlazJng putty S sIdo YAndow Tan, crystallne. brittle
2 Roof shingle West side an ground A5phal0c; 3-tob, groon
Ml;c Fibrous Components
% Type
NO
55 Callulore, organic
— Other Components
% Type
100 Minerals
45 Bitumen, minerals
Asbestos Found
% Type
NO
NO
JZI ed separately from the
Analyst: Bill Schroeder Rog (24 hour) : 2 Distinct layers of non-homageneou5 samples are analyz
Date : 09-ig-2003 11:00 Rush (2 hour) : upper layer (A), downward
Temp: 59 F Batch 30919b ** ND (None Detected) may require a more definitive method of analysis. The lower
limit of reliable detection by this method Is 1%, however, the EPA recommends the
Protocol : EPA Method 600 - use of polarized light microscopy (PLM) and dispersion staining technlqmore definItIve method of"point counUng" It results are less then 10%.
Pago I of I
0
CD
0
0
0
2
Cj
0
M
7
M
0 11
i
1 �
M
0
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
S, WA 98020 (4215) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMOND websile: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DE. PARTMENT
M1 ; a P"ilrfinn 9 Engineering
R"" Hu
11 .0 C. 1 S 9'*j
March 8, 2004
z
0
1
0
M
Wendy Stroschein, Office Manager
Condor Inc. Demolition & Excavation
Post Office Box 1190.
Buckley, Washington 98321
VIA FACSIMILE
RE: Jean Loff Carriage House @ 9016"' Avenue South, Edmonds
Dear Mrs. Stroschein:
The purpose of this letter is to request a timeline as to when your company will submit
(on behalf of Mrs. Loff) for the demolition permit and supplemental materials for her
carriage house.
The City is in receipt of the State Department of Fish and Wildlife letter dated 1/21/04.
However, the, following items are still outstanding:
0 PSCA-PA asbestos permit
o Temporary Erosion Control Plan ith description of work and pen -nit fees
0 Completed permit application form, w
0 Copy of current state contractors license
0 City business license (required to perform work within Edmonds City limits)
To expedite the request for a timeline, please fax to 425-771-0221 to my attention.
Thank you in advance for your speedy reply.
Sincerely,
Jeannine L. GrK
Building official
hicorporated August 11, 1890
cz;,+,, ritly - 14oleinnn Jnnan
1p c. i S9,3
March 14, 2003
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS. WA 98020 * (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: www6edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
Mrs. Jean Loff
9016 1h Avenue South
Edmonds, Washington 98020
RE: Carriage House
Dear Mrs. Loff-
The purpose of this letter is to inforrn you that a citizen has filed a land use complaint against
property you own at 901 6 1h Avenue South in Edmonds. If you are not the current owner of this
property please inforrii our office immediately,
The nature of the complaint alleges that the building may be a dangerous building; the complaint
states that the roof is under stress and has exposed openings that allow for rodent infestation and
rain damage to the interior. The complaint also states that the exterior walls are buckling and are
out of plumb and are in danger of collapsing.
The City Building Inspector has conducted a site visit but was unable to positively determine a
dangerous building code violation because he was only able to view the property from the public
way. In order to respond to the complaint the City is requesting your permission to enter the
building for inspection purposes. The inspection will determine if structural defects exist or
additional investigation is required to make such determination. Or, you may choose to enlist the
services of a professional engineer to make such inspection on your behalf. If you choose this
option the engineer shall submit a written report of his/her findings. Any noted repairs identified
by either the City Building Inspector or your private engineer shall require a building pen -nit to
correct.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me during City business hours (9:00am to
noon and 1:00pm to 4:00pm) at 425-771-0220. If you wish to meet in person please call in
advance for an appointment. Please respond in writing by March 26, 2003 as to how you intend
to resolve this matter.
Sincerely,
��P"4—T
Jeannine L. Graf
Building Official
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: www.ci.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning Building Engineering
C. C)
March 27, 2003
Z
0
Mrs. Jean Loff
901 6h Avenue South
=1 rn-
Edmonds, Washington 98020
0 M
C
RE: Carriage House
M 0
0
0
Dear Mrs. Loff:
M
Thank you for responding to my letter of March 14, 2003. 1 am glad that we mutually agree that
M Z
C —Z
the Carriage House is in need of attention. Your proposal to recycle the building down to the
foundation is acceptable provided the following conditions are met:
65
The contractor is required to obtain a demolition permit (fee $55). Obtain permit at City
0-71
h
Hall at 1215' Avenue North.
M M
The contractor must have a City business license.
C—D
0 r
The contractor is required to fence tile site as work begins.
0 M
C CD
The contractor must obtain the demolition permit and start work by June 2, 2003.
After the demolition permit is issued the work must be'complete within 180 days.
M 0
Z r—
As we agreed, you will begin advertising today for a contractor. If circumstances beyond your
X
control prevent you or your contractor from meeting the imposed deadlines you must
>
immediately notify the City. For example, if you find that no contractor is interested in your
Z
nd
recycling plan you must provide an alternate plan before June 2 for the City to review.
3:
CD
With regard to our assistance, the City has limited outside contacts with regard to aid. Also,
Z
0
demolition work is considered a contractor specialty because of liability and safety issues
0
associated with such work, thus we do not believe any charitable organizations could assist you.
M
If you have any questions about this letter or the timelines please call me at 425-771-0220
extension 1226 during City business hours of 9:00am. to noon and 1:00pm to 4:00pm.
Sincerely,
--V
Jeannine L. GrAF
Building Official
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Citv - Hekinan. JaDan
C.
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771 -=I
Website: wwdedmondsmams
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
Mrs. Jean Loff July 11, 2003
901 6h Avenue South
Edmonds, Washington 98020
RE: Carriage House
Dear Mrs. Lqff:
As a follow-up. to our telephone conversation on July 7h, you assured me that you are still
advertising the Carriage House in the Buy -and -Sell magazine as it is your desire is to find
someone to recycle the wood in the building. Although the City strongly supports recycling, you
have been advertising since March and have had only one serious inquiry. The p I ose of this
urp
letter is to provide options for demolition removal and to create a deadline for final, action. As
discussed before, your options are:
1. Recycle the building down to the foundation, provided the following conditions are met:
o Obtain a demolition permit at City Hall at 121 5h Avenue North for this work
o If someone other than you performs the work that person must be a State licensed
Contractor and must also have a City business license
o Once work starts the site is required to be fenced
o After the demolition permit is issued the work must be complete within 180 days
Note, the City's Recycling Coordinator, Steve Fisher, may have additional contact
information for you of area Recycling contractors, please call him at 425-771-0235 extension
1603 for assistance.
2. With regard to City assistance, it is possible that the Fire Department could use your
building for training purposes. This however, would culminate in the building being
burned and the wood could not be saved. Also, the City takes no responsibility in the
potential damage caused to the foundation during a burning exercise (as it is your desire
to 'save' the foundation please be aware of this risk). If the Fire Chief decides to use the
Carriage House for training, the City waives the demolition fees but a demolition permit
is still issued. For your information, it is our understanding the cost of debris clean up
after a burning is substantially less than fall demolition. If you choose this option,
complete clean-up of the remaining debris must occur within 30 days of the burning.
Contact Mike Smith, Senior Fire Inspector for more information on this potential option
at 425-771-0215 extension 1301.
Incorporated August 11, 1890
I;iqtpr (itu - Hp.kinpin Iannn
Z
0
A
0
M
-n
0)
0 M
C
M 0
0
-40
0
M
M Z
_Z
C/)
0 _n
_n
M M
0
0
0 M
C C/)
9 C0
M 0
Z
X
>
Z
X
Cl)
Z
0
M
mi
As discussed on the telephone it is the City's desire to conclude this matter before the fall
weather starts. Therefore, your official deadline for buildint! demolition is September 30,
2003.
Failure to meet this deadline shall result in the start of the City's Civil Penalties process. It is not
the City's intent to cause you undue hardship however, compliance to the codes is mandatory for
the safety and welfare of all citizens.
If you have alternative options regarding the Carriage House please inform. my office
immediately. Any alternate proposal will be considered by the City and a fmal decision rendered
within 10 days date of receipt.
If you have any questions about this letter, the options provided or the deadline established,
please call me at 425-771-0220 extension 1226 during City business hours of 9:00am to noon
and 1:00pm to 4:00pm. If you wish to meet in person please call in advance for an appointment.
Sincerely,
4-4*
Jeannine L. Graf
Building Official
Cc: Steve Fisher, Recycling Coordinator
Mike Smith, Senior Fire Inspector
Z
M
CITY OF EDMONDS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020
(425) 771-0220
ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATION
Location of Violation (Address and Tax Account Parcel No): 901 6t� Avenue South, Edmonds, WA
98020 Tax Account Parcel No.
Issued To: Jean Loff, Property Owner
Address Of Person This Order Is Issued TO: 901 6h Avenue South, Edmonds, WA 98020
Code Section Violated:. Abatement of Dangerous Building Code
Description of Violation: The Carriage House is considered to be a dangerous buildin2. The roof is
under stress and has exposed openings that allow for rodent infestation and rain damage into the interior.
Upon notification by the Cily the propelly owner contacted the Building Official and agreed that the
Carriage House is dangerous and proposed to recycle the building down to the foundation. The propelly
owner and Building Official agreed that the work (removal or demolition of the structure) must be
complete by September 30, 2003.
Corrective Action Required: This Order is being issued to be assured that the propeEty owner will take
the corrective action outlined in cijy letters dated 3/27/03 and 7/11/03 (copies attached) by removing the
structure by the noted deadline. Failure to have the building removed by the September 3 oth , 2003
deadline shall result in additional enforcement action whereby fines mu be irnRosed for code
compliance.
Correction is Required no later than: 5:00pm (time)September 30,2003 _ (date)
If correction is not made by the date and time specified in the Order, a Notice of
Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation shall assess fines of
$100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues.
Date Posted: —August 29, 2003 Date Mailed: August 29, 2003 Date Served
Issuing Part Jeannine L. Graf Title —Building Official
Signature
z
0
A
0
M
-n
r
0 M
M
0
0 C
M
M z
C _Z
0 _n
n
M M
0
0
0 M
C C/)
C Cl)
M 0
Z
71
-4
X
z
0)
z
0
4
0
M
. �'j
CITY OF EDMONDS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020
(425) 771-0220
RE -ISSUED
ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATION
z
Location of Violation (Address): 901 6 1h Avenue South, Edmonds, WA 98020 0
Issued To: Jean Loff, Propegy Owner M
Address Of Person This Order Is Issued To: 9016 1h Avenue South, Edmonds, WA 98020 =n-
Code Section Violated:. Abatement of Dangerous Building Code
Description of Violation: The Carriage House is considered to be a dangerous building. The roof is
under stress and h is exposed openings that allow for rodent infestation and rain damage into the interior.
Upon notification by the City the property owner contacted the Building Official and agreed that the
Carriage House is dangerous and proposed to recycle the building down to the foundation. The property
owner and Building Official agreed that the work (removal/demolition of the structure) must be
completed by September 30, 2003 however, due to health reasons beyond the property owners' control
the date is herebv extended to December 31, 2003.
Corrective Action Required: This Order is being issued to be assured that the property owner will take
the corrective action outlined in city letters dated 3/27/03 and 7/11/03 (copies attached) by removing the
I st,2003
structure by the noted deadline. Failure to have the building removed by the December 3
for code
deadline shall result in additional enforcement action whereby fines mgy be imposed
compliance. Note, it. is the owners choice to keep and not demolish the foundation, but be advised,
Steve 3ullock, Se iior Planner for the Citv has confirmed that the existing foundation location shall not
be gr idfathered vith regard to location within the prope!jy, location to a designated critical area or
location to setbacks. Also, the foundation shall not grandfathered to prior building code pro_visions as
any new structure Dlaced on top of the foundation must have a foundation system that meets the _current
code at the time a pennit gpj2lication is qpplied for.
Correction is Required no later than: 5:00pm— (time) December 31, 2003 date)
No additional ewtensions to this deadline shall be granted.
If correction is not made by the date and time specified in the Order, a Notice of
Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation shall assess fines of
$100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues.
Date Posted: Date Mailed: September 24, 2003 Date Served
Issuing Party Jeannine L. Graf Title Building Official
Signature
M
M 0
0
0
0 C
X M
Mz
C
o -n
n
M M
0 —0)
0 r-
0 M
M
Z
z
--I
a:
W
z
0
i
0
M
FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM
TO: --
DATE:
MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION
FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE______�
DIVISION DATE_1_:�_—�
ENGINEERING
z
FULAW WN
0
PLANNING DIVISION DATE______�
M
nAM Sm
PROJEC
3:
0
SITE ADDRESS
M
C
M
0
# TED
PERMIT ADB __________PATE.INSPEC
C)
C:
K
MM
MZ
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED�_
ID --I
A field inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with.approved plans. Final approval'
En
denotes that . there are no objections from the above signed Department to the re lease of
0 n
nx
PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of:
>
M M
U5
GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
0 r-
0 M
C Cl)
?. Cn
M 0
Z
7-1
APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
3:
z
GRANT PROJECT
0 Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector
--I
3:
Cn
z
0
fvmr%?.T nT'rr_QTAmnING ISSUES
0
M
FA]UDk1NAJL, U,46.rz
Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector
2.
3.
RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date Si
ocaprvl.doc.l:temp:bldg:formsIo/oI
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR
DATE APPROVED
SETBACKS .....................
FOUNDATION:
Footing......................
Wall..........................
Pier/Porch .................
z
0
Retaining Wall ...........
M
Slab Insulation ..........
PLUMBING:
—11 -n
Underground .............
M
C:
M
Rough -In ...................
0
__10
0
Commercial Final ......
C
K
M
HEATING:
M z
107-1
Gas Test ....................
C z
GasPiping .................
Equipment .................
0 -n
_n
Commercial Final .......
3:9
M M
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
co
0 r—
NAILING ..........................
0 M 4
C: Cn
FRAMING ........................
9 Cn
M
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING ...
Z
—i
INSULATION ...................
Floor Insulation .........
>
z
Wall Insulation ...........
--I
Ceiling Insulation .......
Cn
z
0
SHEETROCK NAILING ...
--i
0
SPECIAL INSPECTION ...
M
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY ..................