20040297 (2).pdfV
DATE RECEIVED PERMIT EXPIRES
7
0I I I I
USE 7E PERMIT o
CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE NUMBER
Y
JOB SUITE/APT#
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION ADDRESS
ss
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINE
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO.
&gAf�2 �_6e -IT 6jt2b�4 y_je7 0%j. L_19T 2
MAILING ADDRESS LID FEE $
W I ESCP Approved 13
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP RW Permit Required 13
0 1 street Use Permit Roq'd E3
CITY EXISTING60� PROPOSED Inspection Requited E3
ZIP TELEPHONE Sidewalk Required [3
REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Underground
2, e:i� Z, ) ?�� I Winng required
NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED
J� I z
314 YESX NO C3
L) rv&-r I /I
4! z
ADDRESS REMARKS z
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLYDRAINAGE
cc 6v% Avu 957
CkO-� I0 11A CO f14 r IiZ OL X
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE L 1 1-4 v 2— N�i-,!CysiA 3
NAME to
CS7+ra),tA�V� EERING REVIEWED/DATE
ADDRESS I
0 j
IRE REVIEWED BY DATE ILLJ
M
CI ZIP TELEPHONE
0
(?e?ll - -
VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION BOND
STATE LICENSE WMBER EXPIRATION DATE V�;L�_`hy REO'D POSTED
/1 11 [3YES A!fNO
) SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT
Qj PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED I PROPOSED
LU o4tego P
7P
'-T6T—COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT)
NEW RESIDENTIAL LUMBING / MECH ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT LIR SIDE REAR
0 A.-P f z
ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR 5-5 7z) ;4 40 E
CHANGE OF USE z
PARKING LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
REMODEL APARTMENT SIGN REO'D I PROVIDED
Ei FENCE 4- 1�-7,4—
REPAIR CYDS ( X FT) REMARKS
DEMOLISH TANK OTHER
GARAGE RETAINING WALL
CARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL
rL 1(TYPff OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
CHECKED By TYPE =CTION E OCCUPANTVJ
FC 'a I GROUP
L)
NUM13ER CR
NUMBER OF ITICAL VV JAREA OCCUPANT
OF DWELLING AREAS SPECIAL INSPECTOR
ED LOAD
0 STORIES "NITS NUMBER REQUIREDX YES I I.---
L
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
N1�5xl jf,6� REMARKS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D z
PROGRESS
M734 &126z�� C;:p1PXjeA:6e
. 0 _)_C—. 192�_, — M
07*�U �-7 L4_,5 "je, 2
:iM ) 1 6� - at, AL 1 DU
HEAT SOURCE GLA71NG % LOT SLOPE %
tVAQ &A4 ...... iby Ll 12N I I . 6*
PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN (CURBS. SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
PERMIT APPLICATION: 160DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT' I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 100 DAYS
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR IIAORE INFORMATION
*APPLICAN1. ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND 1101-D HARMLESS THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTIY OR INDIREC 11-Y
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIF� WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.'
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT. AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITII CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 1B.27.
SIGNAT�
06 AGENT) DATE SIGNED
ATTENTION
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
110/01
VALUATION $
Description
Plan Check
Building
Plumbing
Mechanical
Grading
Engr. Review
Engr. Inspection
Traffic Mitigation
Fire Review
Fire Inspection
LandscapeInsp.
FEE
:3c/
CALL
FOR INSPECTION
(425)
771-0220
EXT 1333
771-0221
FAX
Description I FEE
Recording Fee
City Surcharge
Stat8 Surcharge
Plan Chk Deposit
Receipt #
Total Amount Due
Receipt #
APPLICATION APPROVAL
I tas application is not a PCInat until signed by the
Building 01ficial or his/tror Deputy. and Fees are paid, and
receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
OFFICIAJ S SIGNAI UI1F DATE
�/ 67/cUcli
IIEI.EASFD �IY ADATE
ORIGINAL Fjl F YE(� OW - I�SPECI O�
PINK - OWNER GOI. D - ASSESSOR
z
0
1
0
171
X
0 M
C
1711 0
0
-4 (-)
0 C:
M
ITI z
JC) 4
C -Z
x
0 _n
ri
M M
0
0
0 M
C Cn
90)
M 0
Z
z
... `1
X
0)
z
0
ITI
. Height Calculation/Grading Verification Worksheet
Address: yp�)k 6-t �rf?- Permit#: a0c,43—od,3-7
Date: —C) �d 7
A. Datum Point:
B. Datum Point Elevation:
C. Average Grade: --� ob I
(For Grading Verification Only)
1. Lowest Footing Elevation (shown on grading plan):
2. Actual Footing Elevation:
3. Maximum Elevation Allowed -(Afaverage grade) +25' -3?
4. Reference Point Elevation Shot to House:
(datum elevation)+ (grade to transit level line shot to house) t
6. Measurements from line shot onto house to roof ridge:
Total :- 2L -
7. Actual Elev on: (reference point elevation) (measurements from
#6)
Conclusion:
(actual) is greate less ih-0 3 L4 (allowed); therefore the house is/
is not over the height requiremenf-per ECDC 16.20.30 requirements
L:\TEMP\B UI LDI NG\M I SC\Hei gilt CalculationGrading Verification Worksheet.doc
z
0
i
0
M
0
0
XM
M z
IC) -i
C
0 -n
ri
X
M M
0
0
0 M
C C/)
9 Cn
Q 0
Z
z
X
CI)
z
0
i
0
M
CITY OF EDMONDS
SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT
The proj ect at 171d�; 7_,OL6�29_ P-zil' issued under building
permit number requires special insV�ction and/or testing per UBC Chapter 17
and WAC Amendments 1702. The complete list of specia inspections is attached to this document.
BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED: The owner and contractor and special inspector shall
complete this agreement and the attached structural test(s) and inspections schedule including the
required acknowledgments.
APPROVAL OF SPECIAL INSPECTORS: Each special inspector shall be approved by the
Building Official prior to performing any duties or inspections. Each special inspector shall submit
Statement of Qualifications to the Building Official for review. Special inspectors shall display
identification when performing special inspections on site. Special inspection and testing shall meet
the minimum requirements of LJBC Chapter 17 and the following:
A. Duties and Re on ibili 'es of the Sp-1-ml Incip
1. Observe Work
The special inspector shall observe the site work for conformance. with the approved
(stamped) plans and spqcifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC.
Architect or En�ineer reviewed shop drawings may be used only as an aid.to, inspection.
§pecial inspections are to be performed on a continuous basis --meaning that the special
!nspector is on site at all times observing the work requiring dspoecial inspection. PeHodic
inspections, if any, must have prior approval by the City base n a separate written plan
reviewed and approved by the Building Official and the engineer or architect of record.
2. Report Non -conforming Items
The special inspector shall bring nonconforming items to the immediate attention of the
contractor and note all such items in the daily field report. Any item not resolved in a timely
manner shall be immediate cause of the special inspector to notify the Building Official of the
plan deviation, error, change or omission. It shall also be the duty of the special inspector to
promptly notify the engineer or architect.
3. Complete Daily Reports
Each special inspector shall complete and sign both the special inspection record and the daily
report form for each day's inspection. These records shall remain at the jobsite with the
contractor for review by the City Building Inspector.
4. Furnish Weekly Reports
The special inspector or inspection agency shall furnish the City with weekly reports of tests
and inspections. The project engineer or architect, and others as designated shall also be
copied on reports. Weekly reports must include the following:
• Description of daily inspections and tests made with applicable locations
• List of all nonconforming items
Report on status of nonconforming items (resolved or unresolved)
Itemized changes authorized by the Architect, Engineer and City if not included in
nonconformance items
5. Furnish Final Construction Report
The s ecial inspector or inspection agency shall submit a final sl ed report to the City stating
that sl items requiring special inspection and testing were fulfilred and reported. And, to the
best of his/her knowledge the project is in conformance with the approved plans and
specifications, approved change orders and the applicable workmanship provisions of the
UBC. Items not in conformance or unresolved items or any discrepancies in inspection
coverage, (i.e., missed inspections, periodic inspection when continuous inspections were
required, etc.) shall be specifically itemized in this report.
Z
0
q
0
M
--I -n
M
M 0
0
C-)
0 C:
rn
M Z
04
_Z
X
CD
o -n
n 7d
-.i >
of 9
M M
0
0
0 rn
C: C/)
9(n
M C)
Z
Z
C/)
Z
0
M
f
SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE
PROJECrHAME
BUILDING PERMrr No.
PROJECT ADDRESS TESTINGANSPECTION AGENCY or SPECIAL INSPECTOR
REINFORCED CONCRETE9 GUNITE9 GROUT AND MORTAR:
Concrete Gunite
Grout Mortar
Aggregate Tests
Reinforcing Tests
Mix Designs
Reinforcing Placement
Bitch Plant Inspection
inspect Placing
Cast Samples
Pick-up Samples
Compression Tests
PRECASTIPRESTRESSED CONCRETE:
Piles Post -Tens Pre -Tens Cladding
Aggregate7ests
Reinforcing Tests
Tendon Tests
Mix Desisms
Reinforcing Placement
Insert Placement
Concrete Batching
Concrete Placement
Installation Inscpction
Cast Samples
-+ick-up
Samples
CCpompression Tests
MASONRY:
- Special Inspection Stresses Used
— Preliminary Acceptance Tests (Masonry Units. Wall Prisms)
— Subsequent Tests (Morm Grout, Field Wall Prisms)
— Placement Inspection of Units
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER TESTS
AND INSPECTIONS:
Form completed by:
STRUCTURAL STEEL/WELDING:
- Sample and Test (list specific members below)
— Shop Material Identification
— Welding Inspection 0 Shop 0 Field
— Ultrasonic Inspection 0 Shop 0 Field
— High -strength Bolting
Inspection 0 Shop 0 Field
0 A325 0 N 0 0
0 A490
— Metal Deck Welding Inspection
— Reinforcing Steel Welding Inspection
— Metal Stud Welding Inspection
— Concrete Insert Welding Inspection
FIREPROOFING:
- Placement Inspection
— Density Tests
— Thickness Tests
— Inspect Batching
INSULATING CONCRETE:
- Sample and Test
— Placement Inspection
— Unit Weights
FILL MATERIAL:
- Acceptance Tests
— Placement Inspection
— Field Density
STRUCTURAL WOOD:
- Shear Wall Nailing Inspection
— inspection of Glu-lam Fib.
— Inspection of Truss Joist F�b.
— Sample and Test Components
Title:
Telephone No.: Date:
I
z
0
4
0
M
=i 9
Cn
M
C:
M
0
--10
0 C:
--I K
X M
M Z
10--1
C
Cl)
0
n
M M
0 5)
0 r-
0 M
co
Cn
Q 0
Z
X
z
-4
r
I
CD
z
0
i
0
M
a
I
Apr 20 04 04:10p
CASCADE TESTING
425-823-2203
p. 2
1. Notify the Special inspector
It is the duty of the contractor to notify the special inspector when work is ready for special
inspection. Note, the items listed on the attached schedule a —ad as noted on the approved
plans and specifications arc required to have special inspections. Adequate notice shall be
provided by the contractor so that the special inspector has time to. become familiar with the
project.
2. provide Access to Approved Plans es proved plans at
The contractor is responsible for providing the special inspector acc s to ap
the jobsite.
3. Retain Special inspection Records
The contractor is responsible to retain at the jobsite all eci inspection records submitt6d
by the special inspector. These rocords are to be providJ9 the City building inspecW Upon
request.
Ci Spjdmeut Responsibilitisl
1. Approve special inspectors or inspection agencie3
The building department shall approve all special inspectors and special inspection
requirements.
2. Monitor special Inspection and approve weekly reports
=k Wring special inspection and the performance of special inspectors shall be
�rl by the City Building Inspector. Hisfher approval must be obtained prior to
placement of concrete or other similar activities in addition to that of the special inspector.
3. Issue Certificate of Occupancy
The Building Official may issue a Certificate of occupancy after all weekly special insPccfiOn
reports including the final report have been submitted and accepted.
D. Ownagm2aAffifia, t d
The project Owner or the engineer or architect of record acting as the owner's agen shall fun
special inspection services.
R. En
The 0;girioff or arcWted of re=d shall include special inspec;tion requirements on the plans and
specifications.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I have read and agree to comply with the terms and conditions ofthis agreement,
opecial Inspector
W�Tl. M.-
City Building
Zj�
7tLe J +; I-,S
W, �
Z002) AddVH 39 C9L999V9zr XV3 TS;ST vooz/oz/vo
z
0
i
0
M
'4 "fi
U5 -4
3:
M
0
0
0
0
3: M
M z
10-4
C
Cn
0 -n
n
M M
0
0
0 M
C 0)
9 W
M 0
Z
X
z
z
0
i
0
M
DAILY FIELD REPORT
PO Box 44890 (253) 537-9400 Fax (253) 537-9401
Tacoma, WA 98444 1
9802 29th Ave W #Bl 02 (425) 356-3372 Fax (425) 356-3374
Everett, WA 98204
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NO.
FIELD REPORT NO.
ADDRESS
DATE
-
PAGE
IARRIVALTIMEIMILAGE
s-/ -- .0'--
OF
CITY OR COUNTY
PERMIT NO.
/ -
2aXV
T7
E3RA PROJECT MANAGERPHONE NUMBER
CLIENT
p-,
". A)
k 4
-7
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
E3RA REPRESENTATIVEIPAGE NO.
SUBCONTFUCTCAR
WEATHER
I F-All -ro.
n
TYPE OF W3�1( PERFORMED
EQUIPMENT USED
z
0
1
0
m
-i -n
Fn --I
X
0 M
C
M 0
0
C-)
0 C
--i K
M M
M Z
—Z
X
0 -n
n
--i
M
mm
0
0
0 M
C cl)
9 Cf)
M 0
Z
r
z
--I
X
Cl)
z
0
i
0
m
w
DAILY FIELD REPORT
PO Box 44890 (253) 537-9400 Fax (2�3) 537-9401 E 3 R--A
Tacoma, WA 98444 1
--L�9802 29th Ave W #Bl 02 (425) 356-3372 Fax (425) 356-3374
Everett, WA 98204
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NO. FIELD REPORT NO.
ADDRESS
DATE PAGE OF
03 7'
CITY OR COUNTY
PERMIT NO.
ARRIVAL TIME MILAGE
3
2 a,4- 0
CLIENT
E3RA PROJECT MANAGERIPHONE NUMBER
72.
GENERAL CONTRACCTOR
E5U-REPRESENTATIVE/PAGE
NO.
C'n kvi
SUBCONTRACTOR
WEATHER
TYPE OF WORK PERFORMED
EQUIPMENT USED
I --b
z
0
1
0
m
--I -n
m
C:
m 0
0
C)
0 C
--19
M: M
M z
a:
En
0
n
-n
--A
M
M
055
0
0
C:
r-
m
9
M
cl)
U)
0
Z
>
z
--I
r
55
z
0
1
0
m
1� =
DAILY FIELD REPORT
PO Box 44890 (253) 537-9400 Fax (253) 537-9401
Tacoma, WA 98444
9802 2.9th Ave W #Bl 02 (425) i56-3372 Fax (425) 356-3374
9:%lara VVA 98204
1:*." rt, -
PROJECT NO. FIELD REPORT NO.
AE
I 5A�,, PAGE
CK OF
/7/ 03 PERMIT NO. 7AR—RIVALnME I MILAGE
NTY
E3RA PROJECT MANAUtRfi*iONE NUMBER
tl�'Ik. , , , , 4 -72-
E3RA REPRESENTAIIVEIPAGE 140.
)NTRACTOR
CTOR WEATHER jy
67K-) :f-., r--.) C=:k r-
WK —PERFORMED
USED
c-4- I r
z
0
A
0
m
—i -n
55 -j
3:
0 m
C
M 0
0
--10
0
3: M
M z
1C) --i
C
3:
(j)
0 -n
n
-4
3:9
M M
0
0
0 M
C u)
F. (f)
M C)
Z
71
r
z
Cf)
z
0
i
0
M
R.
DAILY FIELD REPORT
PO Box 44890 (253) 537-9400 Fax (253) 537-9401
Tacoma, WA 98444
-3372 Fax (425) 356-3374
.,4,,980229thAveW#Bl02 (425)i56
Fvpreft- WA 98204
1 *1
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NO.
r- '0 -4 02 /
FIELD REPORT NO.
--S
ADDRESS
DATE,/
PAGE
OF
CITY OR COUNTY__
PERMIT NO.
.77
ARRIVAL TIME/ MiLAGE
CLIENT 'F3RA
MANAGERN*iONE N
PROJECT UMBER 7
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
E3RA REPRESENTATIVE/PAGE NO.
sUBC4XfIRACTOR
WEATHER
T7FE OF -WORK PERFORMED
llk-wc:)cD'4(2)w
EQUIPMENT S /"
z
0
1
0
M
--i -n
M
m 0
0
0
0 C:
M
M Z
n, -4
Cp
o -n
ri
M M
0
0
0 M
C: cl)
90
M 0
Z
;u
—1
r
z
Cl)
z
0
i
0
M
DAILY FIELD REPORT E3RA
PO Box 44890 (253) 537-9400 Fax (253) 537-9401
Tacoma, WA 98444
9802 29th Ave W #Bl 02 (425) 356-3372 Fax (425) 356-3374
Everett, WA 98204 - PRWECT NO. - FIELD REPORT NO.
PROJECT NAME ��-C) -1� r-) -2- 1
114�5 DATE PAGE
ADDRESS s OF
/ 7 76- //:)o PERMIT NO. ARRIVALTIME I MILAGE
CITY OR COUNP�7 079-7
CLIENT E3RA PROJECT MANAGEWPHONE NUMBER -7
4a
E3RA REPRESE nvEIPAGE NO.
GENERAL CTOR
WEATHER
SUBCONTRACTOR
r C')
TYPE OF WORK PERFORMED \J0 L-1
I . " C)
EQUIPMENT USED
z
0
m
--I -n
U5 --I
3:
m
C
m
0
--10
0 C:
--j ?.
:1 M
M z
r) -4
C
3:
Cl)
0 -Tl
n
M M
0
0
0 M
M
Z
r
z
-i
3:
Cn
z
0
m
", - .:, %
p%
DAILY FIELD REPORT
PO Box 44890 (253) 537-9400 Fax (i53) 537-9401 E3RA
Tacoma, WA 98444
9802 29th Ave W #Bl 02 (425) i56-3372 Fax (425) 356-3374
Everett, WA 98204
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NO.
F 02U
FIELD REPORT NO.
ADDRESS
/-7/CI3
DATE
E5
PAGE
I OF
CfTY OR COUNTY
PERMIT NO.
ARRIVAL TIME I MILAGE
CLIENT
E3RA PROJECT MANAGER/PHUNE NUMBER
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
E3RA REPRESENTATIVEIPAGE NO.
SUBCONTRACTOR
WEATHER
TYPE OF WORK PERFORMED
z3uj/chv�(4
EQUIPMENT USED
A-10 C- '� /I cf ) �--j
z
0
1
0
M
--i -n
0 M
C
M
0
C)
0 C
M
M Z
10-1
C
0 -Tl
n
M M
0
0
0 M
C (n
9 co
M 0
Z
7-1
M
z
--I
M
U5
z
0
i
0
M
0
CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC.
TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS
12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE
KIRKLAND. WASHINGTON 98034 (425) 823-c?8(jO
EVERETT . (425)259-0817
PREVIOUS
REPORT No
DATE-U
FIELD REP(.0.1"'IRT
..Altz
PROJECT
e_%_ir A 11L
LOCATION
TO: 17 1 Gn
BLDG.PERMI
6 &Lk,
RECEIVED
No. 120044
CERT. NO.
TEMP. AT AM
AT PM
ENGINEER
JUN 2 2 2004 JAMIF-'som CQW3UM_NV_-r
DEVELOPMENT SFFiVI0,ES CTR ARCHITECT
CITY OF EDMONDS DEtN EVAK REM
ATTN: r�MKITOAnTnP
(2)
INSPECTION PERFORMED
RESTEEUCONCRETE — FIESTEEL ONLY
RESTEIEUMASONRY — STR.STfWELDING
OTHEREME>E0, — STR.STIBOLTING
EFOXY. 5
(4)
LOCATION (AREAS)
(3)
ITEMS INSPECTED
FOOTINGS
AUGER CAST PILES
DRILLED PIERS
(5)
CONCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c)
SUPPLIER '511IMP50hi TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED
SLUMP (INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST
AIR CONTENT(%) ___ I SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO.
AYES —NO —ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCEWITH BLDG. DEPT.APPROVED PLANS
REMARKS:
1.0 Em5E:0 Ncyx U-1
r7fl-XY AF,�nvF_ WA'b
MET
16) 7%
f5ZAJC-J"E]D
"�"wvkvwq I � - 2 1 1; d in _0_7 Am wa 0 m_
TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS
HEREIN TESTED. THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S), NAME(S) PRINTED
BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL. WITH-
OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE SIGNATURE
TESTING LABORATORY. INC. INSPECTOR
REVISED B/00 SIGNED BY
COPIES TO
FOUNDATIONS
SLAB
COLUMNS
WALLS
BEAMS
7
LED
z
0
q
0
IT!
:;:9
m
c:
M
0
__10
0 C
-I K
m M
M Z
r') --I
c -Z
W
0 -n
n
m M
0
0
0 M
C (1)
r. cl)
M 0
Z r-
3:
z
0)
z
0
i
0
m
0
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
(425) 771-0221
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX
Website. vAm.d.edinondSma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - BUilding Engineering
c)
October 14,2004 Z
0
0
M
Charles Scott Shanks
1359 N 205 St.
Shoreline, WA 98133 Cn
rn
C
M
0
0
Re: Building Permit: 2004-0297 0 C:
Site Address: 17103 Talbot Rd. M
M Z
Expiration Date: April 23, 2005
C
Z
The purpose ofthis letter is to inforin you that the last remaining inspection on your
C/)
project is a final inspection(s). The final inspection(s) deteri-nines that there are no 0 -n
n
outstanding life -safety issues and approval allows the City to close your permit file.
M M
ction to be one of the most important inspections 0—
The City considers the final inspe 0 Cn
I approval the following must be complete:
conducted on a project. In order to grant fina 0 M
C Cn
smoke detectors, house numbers, guardrails, handrails, self -close doors between garage
9 Cn
M
from sleeping roonis, safety -lazing, ,veather-stripping, any 0
and residence, egress Z r-
1C11tS etc. Of Course not all of these things may
Engineering department rcquiren
about the kinds of things
specifically apply to your project but it does alVe You an i
that must be complete as well as some items that do not need to be installed such as:
r, etc. Please be advised permits expire one year from Z
paint, carpet, moldings, wallpape
need more time to complete the work, permits can be
the date ofissuance. Ifyouwill
renewed prior to expiration for one half fees. If the permit expires without a final Cn
approval granted by the Building Inspector, full fees are required in order to renew the Z
0
permit. This can be very costly to you and we strongly encourage you to check your --i
0
permit expiration date and call for the required final inspection(s). Note: If more than M
one department is required to final your project, this is noted on your Job Card.
Please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220 if you have any questions.
iticcrely,
i4inyadwi
Nv
ennit Coordinator
W*emP\DST's\N I aster Letters\,S Rwaarri WS Fit
Incorporated August 11, 1890
-in. Janan
Sister Citv - Hekin,
0
ENGINEERING DRAMAGE REPORT
for
Shanks Residence
171xx Talbot Road
Edmonds, Washington
City of Edmonds File, No.
January 2004
f
I
f
A
64
1.11 V
, X�� , '.
30; A
3950
PER -Al
r
L
F —PIRES
8/17!Oq
Prepared By: Robert L. I-ong, PE
M
a 1 4 E q 1 3 U I I=
. , a Z
Lovell-Sauorland & Associates
19400 33rd Avenue W. Suite 200
Lynnwood, Washington 98036
LSA FILE NO: 4530
z
0
1
0
M
-i -n
0 M
C
M 0
0
C-)
0 C
M
M Z
jo
C
Cj)
0 -n
n
M M
0
0
0 M
C C/)
9 C/)
M 0
Z
z
Cl)
z
0
i
0
M
ENGINEERING DRAINAGE REPORT
for
Shanks Residence
171xx Talbot Road
Edmonds, Washington
City of Edmonds File No.
January 2004
F RES 811=7/091
:Irepared By: Robert L. Long, PE
MOM
I it a I N E E 4 8 1 8 U R V E Y 0 R 8 z
Lovell-Saueriand & Associates
19400 33rd Avenue W. Suite 200
Lynnwood, Washington 98036
LSA FILE NO: 4530
z
9
0
M
INTRODUCTION
This report was prepared to support the building permit application submission to City of
Edmonds for the construction of a single family resident. The primary issues of concern
are to address stormwater detention and grading calculations.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NUMBER OF
SECTION CONTENTS PAGES
A. Project Description ........................................
B. Vicinity Map, Existing Conditions Map, and Site Plan .............. 3
C. Detention Summary & Calculations and Basin Map ............... 5
D. Grading and Erosion Control Summary, Calculations and Soil Map ... 3
Shanks Residence City of Edmonds
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates LSA File No. 4530
Januaty 2004
z
0
1
0
M
--I -n'
M
C
M 0
0
-40
0
M
M z
F- -q
X
o -n
MM
0
0
0 M
C/)
CO)
M 0
Z
X
z
C/)
z
0
i
0
M
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Site location. The site is located in the NE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 27, Range 4, W.M.
No site address has been assigned site, but it is expected to be 171xx Talbot Road (Tax
Parcel Number 270407-001-041-00).
Site description. The site consists of a rectangled shaped a lot, with an approximate
depth of about 244 feet and 90 feet wide. The area of the site is about 0.50 acres. Access
to the site will be provided off of Talbot Road, adjacent to the site's westerly boundary.
Currently there are no existing buildings on -site. Topographically the site generally slopes
from east to west. The highest high point of the property is located near the back
northeasterly corner, with the lowest point being located at the front southwest corner.
There is about 28 feet of total drop between the high and low points of the site. An existing
rockery located along the east and the east half of the north property line provides grade
relief. The rockery has a maximum height of about 10 feet (maximum height is located at
the northeast property corner). Additional retaining walls are located along the sites
northerly border along the western half. All retaining structures on -site appear to be stable,
however additional analysis should be preformed by a licensed geotechnical engineer prior
to any grading disturbance near the retaining structures. From the SCS soils survey for
Snohomish County, the designated soil is Alderwood Urban Complex (sandy gravelly
loam).
Proposed project. The current proposal is to construct a single-family resident on the -
site. The new resident will install and utilize a private driveway along sites southern
property line for access. A tank (pipe) is proposed to be installed along the west side of
the proposed house (down grade of the proposed improvements). All of the impervious
surfaces from the resident and driveway are proposed to be collect and detained in the
detention tank. An oil/water separator tee (flow control tee) is proposed to provide water
quality for the collected run-off. The discharge from the detention tank will be to the
existing storm drainage system along Talbot Road to an existing cacthbasin located near
the properties southwest corner.
The following list summarizes the proposed detention system, the actual input/output data
is attached.
Detention System = 19 LF of 60" CMP Pipe
Design Storage Volume = 434 cf
Shanks Residence
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates
January 2004
City of Edmonds
LSA File No. 4530
Z
0
1
0
R1
:; 9
C M
M 0
0
0 C
-i K
X rn
M Z
_Z
E:
o -n
n
:C
M M
0
0
0 rn
C (n
C (f)
M 0
Z
Z
--i
M
W
Z
0
1
0
M
NE
;b
MON
I' TDWNS411*140, 0L* -AANg&_E_WM.
7
27 4
SE-6-27-4
23
A�--
24
C
26
27
28
21
9
1
sio-
2 1 '1
-i 1 107
10
4 a'
OC; 5 A 0
rS,'? 7 9
. 5-
T 1--T
1 41 3 -' 9
f 2 1 1
61 1
7
01
9
S
4 9
7S TR 13
r
10
00
N 39 ......
of
P
40 P 3
102
7 2
12 1
42 TR 999 1 1 03
Z— EDMONDS /79Z'10
1-014
1.058
LYNNWOOD CITY LIMITS
03
EDK49NDS CITY umas
1.015 1-009
%
. .............. ..... % 13
f-062 'N .,x
2 -r-'067- .......
12
J, 1.019 1.057 1-0 1 -1 ,,
.1 t 04
Al C:
1-032
0 1 Is 06
I-M
.030 M 1-020
-1 0
< .. ..........
0 . v- 1-021 07
eb . ......
Ov
Q 048
V .- ..... . 10 it
0
1. 6
074 f-047 2
SP 8-49 j71!
1 9
.,1.073 1.004 F-008 06 12
4
-86
-035 SP S;27
1023 2
1.024 .,1-072
01 070 1 1.046
4
SP S41-76 05
A �7
0 -041 Y, I
2
2 ',�,.1-04 S-32;87
3 1-003 11-001 16
3 1-038 e7
4
;6 11-002,
2\
6 19
1-005 1-006 20
A r-039 3
1.065 ... -- 1. ., 11 5 .............
1; SEA-,,L�,�AWN 6
6
'J� 9 7N
O,t 9 10 4
\7 8 5 4-00
MEA0P\1
1 9 1
I
7�
7 B\
Vicinity (Parcel) Map
SE-7-274
Shanks Residence
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates
January 2004
SIT&
10
6
7
36
37
Cli --
C,
38
z
City of Edmonds
LSA File No. 4530
N
zr
Nil
cu
CD
cl)
CD
cz-
Z3
0
po
CD
C/)
Q)
INC
r� 0
co
-n c)
::::. -,h
CD m
c-T1 CL
w cn
0
m
x
0
0
r MIA
10,011111
0
U)
4)
q: dy,
Y,o
Poll
X
POP NXIII
TRY ccm� (it)
NY 9512-8 PVC E)
TRY 4805-W CONC.
TRY 9815,-12- CPLP (N)
Nv :a o-w Pvc: �j
TRY a bS V PVC I
Ott Or IQUONUS SEWER EASEUENT
Ao'r NO 2121643)
4 WHOUG"T RON FENCE
M H CONC FCC)TN0
AND DRIN WA U. SCALE i V-10,
^ 1P — MM — "M —
C 207
8' C04C. RETAQl
WALL WIN 6' WOOD
PENCE BASIS OF BEARINGS
N 44141W I AS WEASLAEO motoci Pill LoOkuml
RAo 0. a MMALINE OF Of TALBOT ROAD PER KID K�
EX SEWER MH
FELO ADJJST
4' MRE FENCE
'116 [A AM
Z�A I �Tl� !
1
Ex ROCKI
4 OR
"FPO
NOTES
I PHIL tOCAkM OF P)MIRINGIN)" UTILITIES SHOWN Ex IP* MDE COKC. FOOTING 101*
INEON Of A"IDNERtAtt CKY AND 00 mOT Pill FNR TILSIT Milt CAROANG
lochim OF ALL UTILITIES ON ON 0 Int �ry or INIE
"ACT "OPERIT IN( 0041111 S`KAL1tF) COMPACT ALL
UIXIII PURYtTLINIT IN " ARTA TO ASCIENTAIN THE 'Pil I
LOCAIKIN NO DEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES Val"
I tKS NO DOLS ROT ftJNPCWT 10 VIOW AIL PROKOTY
3 "OKIIII SAACT 10 (AMMER?%. INISIRRICT13tFS AND
PIESIRN"KINS or RECORD
IT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ALL IMAT "tm a GOARMANI LOT 3. SICIVION 7. TOONUO 37.
I1AACf 4 CAST, Will. td%C1%KI) AS IMLOWS
PECININT) AT I PlON1 IN 114 IASI WARCIN Of PUMP ROAD 501174 6* cimmim riNct: r
FITT NC*FK 643&'W CAST FPICTA, MRJI%KCNQk OF (All W&ACTIN Or
TgWjl IIOAJ) ANT) %CILiM TIME If SAW]l CA)YERMWENT LOT 2.
"Na CONT"A MONTH 441650' IASI 9000 Fitt.
TVIINCE SWTH 45-1310- (All 244% FEET. 1\01
`N(NCE 50,1114 4414'506 051 MOO $fit.
T.EWCt NORM 454110, Will 144 5 Pitt 10 "d tKAE PONT or
SITUAM A PIPE fill Of %hCNDbK%K SIAM OF WASHINGION \0
LEGEND
(9) TATUM WOOKIWENI AS DtVJMD
0 SET 1/2' X 24' PESO A CAP
STALIPID ILSA 2nee,
SET NAA- WIN BRASS WAS" STARIPED 'LSA 22Hr
BENCHMARK & DATUM
ELEY.-IDODO
NORM RM Or SEVIER WAFR4LI LOCATED �OKMAIIILT
ITT Fl. N* Or WOST NOAThE*LY PROPI[Itly CORKA
DATIAL �s�
IN
K� NI-1739
v
0`29 2
IOE. 40
BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY
FOR
SC07T SHANKS
1/4, NE.1/4, SECTION 7, T. 27 N., R. 4 E.. W.M.
CITY OF EDMONDS
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON
C6
cu
cf)
cn
N)
cu
:70
c:
(D
(D
2itill
7
cn
a.
CD
Z3
0
Qo
CD
111
c1l)
(n
All
(b
fiI
CD
cn
IN
C)
till
viiiI
All
M
p
-9gL
(AJ
(ZI
Will;
SAM X—X
I
%
Air 9
P
ficuld
low
,vWf,,
P
IN SEI/l NEI/l SECTION 7. T. 27 N, R. 4 E-0 WIM,
alpffill.
00 "Wr
WON —
""I �11- olip tit)
laclt-* PVC �1
a" CIA l� 111101 11AMANT
to "al"ll
t it Z, I,,
-b
Ilk wit
MC will
00
NOW a- clut
Im
—vit m
4
02011
"It AS
Ilk 0,44
a SAM r gin
:
9 all
14. P. i, I
ra��
P/ r maks ruct
It
1 ;Ijp .
CA&C, Wit,
I All 9
It
ir skimmings
-- -------- ................. .......
.... ......
cal WU���
Still
APPOF Fill Clif"
UI1tk W
0 All
�If � r1mall
t
a- lot
If as as
Reagan, IM)
A'
All
fawl ef
cill
N
SCALI 11 slow
0 0 M
OONSYRUCTION SEQUENICIE
L CALL M UNLITT
4 1W � Wit
It NITALL " vWKIAA1 cAllo muc� W WM)
mm f4m I
�m"" �K m �D MCA,
ft�n
a Polka Waimut jvskm� suma alitim. ramilL Lm)
f� Polito as mxc�
�ia � buto, A&I filt
Ilc m�s �
� AM 141041011
ORADING QUANWTWM
PoKPILL. was
list
Ilia
��Mml
NO"
wa
uftftall AM ��n AMC �ft
me
=I= �� � UKHT �h�
CAP, IF Airt � AM "Am"
CAPTog isguall �ULI
It �v
" Ile
its lit
CALL BEFORE YOU DIQ I—BOO-424—MM
/Akil
�ti 01310 :p1m,s "D ��T Sign 11) mumAx s"Ago
matimaggill
PAM RAIJIL AND 11ANG 9
a MAL K�� 100311 fris-tilial #0 A "Ustaggi Until
mail fill MAE. �c�s
Is
a K� IM AIPAPAao " "kilialikka" ill likkkkat
�n a Wd
II I . �AN �" a 54 K
�x WUNAL I'd fwAII PAM
as o�2 W1 " W ""
W as
Ki (W
is allosp?
.fiIp:11s I
fill 1141
i
til�
dli�
m
9
La�I�MAP
onp V�MOPER
AL
"A slogan!
�m�
fgglptm)�"
ENQNEER/SURVEYOR
a �mmckl WC,
impai-xim Avoull 6. SAW
MIAMI
mi m r�imi I"
A&RULIKAMIA
"Irvar I ma mr,mums ood liff
WV-Inw
MaN to a, goal UA,Nl smaggs �mr As is m as
Kill wool margins
wul, �
"M DESCRIPI'10".
A,i sufrignial Nt� 1.
� owt.s��"�
wi�W �g�mtsm]
satio
"Pas sal "sesil Mgt No got
also �* Impose, all 1042 Pill All 04 If
K�
milimall As 1411 �m 0 � BUM 0
SITE ADDRESS
$nll skills! b0o
�m�
I& proat-AgI
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CITY Of EDMONDS
will,
SITE DMLOPWNT FILM
FOR
SHANKS RESIDENCE.
IN SEII NEI/4o SECTION 7* L 27 N, R, 4 Ell W.M.
CITY oF EmNos
SNCHOMISH COUINTYt WASHNGTON
DETENTION SUMMARY AND CALCULATIONS:
Stormwater detention is proposed to be designed to the City of Edmonds standards.
Developments which are under one acer and do not discharge directly or indirectly to a
stream are required to maintain the predeveloped condition peak runoff rate for the 10-
year, and 1 00-year, 24 hour design storms (with a minimum control orifice size of 5/8").
The SCS method was the type of analysis used for the calculations. WaterWorkSTM
Release 4.13 was the software used to model the detention calculations. The SCS curve
number calculations represent the pre -developed and post -developed conditions and are
attached. The existing site cover is assumed to be meadow. Due to the relatively small
size of the project area, a conservative estimate of ten (10) minutes for the pre -developed
time of concentration and five (5) minutes for the developed conditions have been
assumed. Additionally, the site's soil type have been identified as Alderwood type C soil
based on the SCS soil survey. The following table is a summary of the detention
calculations, the actual input/output data follow.
Detention Calculation Summary Table:
I Recurrence interval:
1 0-Year
---Existing r-unoff. cfs-
Developed runoff - 02 1-6- cf-s-.
Design discharge 0.07 cfs
Design detention storage 246 cf
Shanks Residence
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates
January 2004
0 � U
66-i. - im ii
100-Year
0.17 cfs
0.27 cfs
0.17 cfs
434 cf
City of Edmonds
LSA File No. 4530
Z
0
1
0
M
-i -n
M
C
M
0
0 C:
M
M Z
10-4
C:
X
o -n
n
M M
0
0
0 M
C: Cn
9 (n
M 0
Z
r
Z
Cn
Z
0
M
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY:
MATCH IN FLOW -STO- -DIS- -PEAK- OUTFLOWSTORAGE
< -------- DESCRIPTION-> (cfs) (cfs) --id- -id- -STAGE> id (cfs) VOL (cfi
10 YEAR ...................... 0.07 0.16 PI C1 94.82 1 0.07 246.78cf
100 YEAR .................... 0.17 0.27 P1 C1 97.00 2 0.17 434.70cf
OUTFLOW AFTER DETENTION: STAGE FLOW RATE
10 YEAR ...................... 94.82 0.07 cfs
100 YEAR ..................... 97.00 0.17 cfs
Basin Summary
Existing Conditions:
BASIN ID: E010 NAME: EXISTING 10 YEAR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA 0.51 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION 2.00inches AREA..: 0.51Acres O.00Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 85.00 0.00
TC : 10.00min 0.00min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.07 cfs VOL: 0.03 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
BASIN ID: E100 NAME: EXISTING 100 YEAR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTALAREA 0.51 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALLTYPE TYPElA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.51 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 85.00 0.00
TC : 10.00min 0.00min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAKRATE: 0.17cfs VOL: 0.06Ac-ft TIME: 500min
Developed Conditions:
BASIN ID: D010 NAME: DEVELOPED 10 YEAR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... 0.51 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPElA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION 2.00inches AREA..: 0.23Acres 0.28Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00min CN 86.00 98.00
TC : 5.00min 5.00min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAKRATE: 0.16cfs VOL: 0.06Ac-ft TIME: 500min
BASIN ID: D1100 NAME: DEVELOPED 100 YEAR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA 0.51 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPEIA PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION 3.00inches AREA..: 0.23Acres 0.28Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10-00min CN 86.00 98.00
TC : 5.006n 5.00min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.27 cfs VOL: 0.09 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min
Shanks Residence
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates
January 2004
City of Edmonds
LSA File No. 4530
z
0
i
0
M
--i -n
15 -1
0 M
C
M
0
0 C:
--I K
3: M
M Z
JO --i
C _Z
-4
3:
Cn
0 -n
n
m M
ous
0 r-
0 M
C CD
9 Cn
M 0
Z
X
z
Cn
z
0
1
0
m
I =
Shanks Residence
SCS Weighted average curve number calculations
LSA No. 4530 Dec 2003
SCS Hydrologic Soils type: --- > C Total
S.f Ac.
Development Area 22,005 0.505
Existing conditions (areas in square feet)
Assumptions:
Undisturbed forest land
Second growth forest
Meadow or pasture
Grass, > 75% coverage
Grass, > 50% coverage
Impervious (House, D[W, and Private Road)
Total Weighted CN for each basin:
Collected
CN:
76
81 -
85 22,005
86 -
90
98
85.0
Pervious:
Area, acres:
0.505
Percent pervious area:
100.0%
Weighted CN:
85.0
Impervious:
Area, acres:
Percent impervious area:
Future conditions
Total
Total AC:
0.505
Total sf:
22,005
Assumptions:
CN:
Undisturbed forest land
76
-
Second growth forest
81
Meadow or pasture
85
-
Grass, > 75% coverage
86
10,005
Grass, > 50% coverage
90
-
Impervious (House, D/W, Walk and Patio)
98 Total
12,000
Total Weighted CN:
92.5
Pervious:
Total
Area, acres:
0.230
Percent pervious area:
45.5%
Weighted CN:
86.0
Impervious:
Area, acres:
0.275
Percent impervious area:
54.5%
Weighted CN:
98.0
Shanks Residence
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates
January 2004
City of Edmonds
LSA File No. 4530
z
0
q
0
rn
-n
CD
3:
rn
0
0 C
3: M
M Z
C —Z
0 -n
n
rn rn
0
0 M
C C/)
9 Cn
Q 0
Z
z
--I
3:
C/)
z
0
q
0
M
STAGE STORAGE TABLE:
UNDERGROUND PIPE 10 No. PI
Descripbon: DETENTION PIPE
Diameter: 5.00 ft. Length: 22.20 ft.
Slope 0.00501`0 upsir: dnstr:
STAGE -STORAGE- STAGE -STORAGE- STAGE -STORAGE- STAGE STORAGE
(ft) --cl- -Ac-Ft- (ft) --cf -Ac-Ft- (ft) --cf- -Ac-Ft- (ft) --cf-- -Ac-Ft-
0
92.00 0.0000 0.0000 93.40 94449 0.0022 94.80 245.04 0.0056 9620 386.24 0.0089
92.10 0.9371 0.0000 93.50 104.40 0.0024 94.90 256.G6 0.0059 96.30 394.39 0.0091
M
92.20 3.7982 0.0001 93.60 114.56 0.0026 95.00 267.01 0.0061 96.40 402.11 0.0092
92.30 8.0271 0.0002 93,70 124.90 0.0029 95.10 277.89 0.0064 96.50 409.34 0.0094
92.40 13.220 0.0003 93.80 135.40 0.0031 95.20 288.67 0.0066 96.60 416.02 0.0096
92.50 19.182 0,0004 93.90 146.05 0.0034 95.30 299.33 0.0069 96.70 422.05 0.0097
92.60 25.793 0,0006 94.00 156.81 0.0036 95.40 309.85 0.0071 96.80 427.34 0.0098
92.70 32.966 0.0008 94.10 167,68 0,0038 95.50 320.21 0.0074 96.90 431.69 0.0099
C
M
92.80 40.633 0.0009 94.20 178.63 0,0041 95.60 330.39 0.0076 97.00 434.69 0.0100
M
0
92.90 48,740 0.0011 94.30 189.64 0,00" 95.70 340.36 0.0078 97.10 435.90 0.0100
0
93.00 57.241 0,0013 94.40 200.70 0.0046 95.80 350.11 0.0080 97.20 435.90 0.0100
0
93,10 66.096 0.0015 94.50 211.79 0.0049 95.90 359.60 0.0093
C
K ,
93.20 75.269 0.0017 94.60 222.89 0.0051 96.00 368.81 0.0085
M
93.30 84.730 0.0019 94.70 233.98 0.0054 96.10 377.70 0.0087
M
Z
C
z
Calculated Pipe 22.2 ft. of 5.0 ft. diameter pipe.
M
V5
0
-n
Additional Storage provided in CB Manholes:
-n
Type 2 CB Manholes (48 inch)
Volume in active 5.0 ft. (3.14) x (2)2 X (5)]
M
M
0
Volume = 62.8 c.f.
0
0
M
C
CD
Additional Storage in 24 in. connector pipe:
C
M
Cn
1- 2 ft. of 24" pipe
Z
0
Volume (3.14) X (1)2
Volume 3.14 c.f.
Total Additional Storage
z
Volume = 65.94 c.f.
CAl
z
0
Equivalent Length of 5.0 ft. diameter pipe (65.94) [(3.14) x (2.5)2
Length = 3.36 feet.
0
M
Net Required pipe 19 feet of 5.0 ft. diameter pipe
Shanks Residence City of Edmonds
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates LSA File No. 4530
January 2004
�J
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE:
COMBINATION DISCHARGE
IDNo. C1
Description: CONTROL STRUCTURE
Structure: 01 Structure:
Structure: R1 Structure:
STAGE -DISCHARGE- STAGE <-DISCHARGE- STAGE <-DISCHARGE-> STAGE <-DISCHARGE->
(ft) --cfs- ---
(ft) -cfs- - (ft) --- cfs- - (h) --cfs-
92.00 0.0000
93.80 0.0569
95.60 0.1222
97.40 1.2386
92.10 0.0134
93.90 0.0584
95.70 0.1260
97.50 1.3665
92.20 0.0190
94.00 0.0600
95.80 0.1297
97.60 1.4823
92.30 0.0232
94.10 0.0614
95.90 0.1331
97.70 1.5890
92.40 0.0268
94.20 0.0629
96.00 0.1365
97.80 1.6884
92.50 0.0300
94.30 0.0643
96.10 0.1398
97.00 1.7818
92.60 0.0328
94.40 0.0657
96.20 0.1429
98.00 1.8703
92.70 0,0355
94.50 0.0670
96.30 0.1460
98.10 1.9546
92.80 0.0379
94.60 0.0684
96.40 0.1490
98.20 2.0352
92.90 0.0402
94.70 0.0697
96.50 0.1519
98.30 2.1125
93.00 0.0424
94.80 0.0710
96.60 0.1547
98.40 2.1870
93.10 0.0445
94.90 0.0830
96.70 0.1575
98.50 2.2589
93.20 0.0464
95.00 0.0921
96.80 0.1602
98.60 2.3285
93.30 0.0483
95.10 0.0988
96.90 0.1629
98.70 2.3960
93.40 0.0502
95.20 0.1044
97.00 0.1655
98.80 2.46116
93.50 0.0519
95.30 0.1094
97.10 0.6996
98.90 2.5254
93.60 0.0536
95.40 0.1139
97.20 0.9223
99.00 2.5876
93.70 0.0553
9550 0.1182
97.30 1.0938
MULTIPLE ORIFICE
ID No. 01
Description: CONTROL ORIFICE
Outlet Elev: 92.00
Elev: 92.00ft OrificeDiameter. 1.2500in.
Elev: 94.85ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 1.3330in.
STAGE -DISCHARGE-> STAGE -DISCHARGE-> STAGE <-DISCHARGE- STAGE -DISCHARGE-
--cfs----
(ft) --cfs-- (ft)
--cfs-- (ft) --cfs--
- ---------------
92.00 0,0000
93.80 0.0569
95.60 0.1222
97.40 0.1755
92.10 0.0134
93.90 0.0584
95.70 0.1260
97.50 0.1779
92.20 0.0190
94.00 0.0600
95.80 0.1297
97.60 0.1803
92.30 0.0232
94.10 0.0614
95.90 0.1331
97.70 0.1826
92.40 0.0268
94.20 0.0629
96.00 0.1365
97.80 0.1849
92.50 0.0300
94.30 0.0643
96.10 0.1398
97.90 0.1872
92.60 0.0328
94.40 0.0657
96.20 0.1429
98.00 0.1894
92.70 0.0355
94.50 0.0670
96.30 0.1460
98.10 0.1917
92.80 0,0379
94.60 0.0684
96.40 0,1490
98.20 0.1938
92.90 0.0402
94.70 0.0697
96.50 0.1519
98.30 0,1960
93.00 0.0424
94.80 0.0710
96.60 0.1547
98.40 0.1981
93.10 0.0445
94.90 0.0830
96.70 0.1575
98.50 0.2002
93.20 0.0464
95.00 0.0921
96.80 0.1602
98.60 0.2023
93.30 0.0483
95.10 0.0988
96.90 0.1629
98.70 0.2044
93.40 0.0502
95.20 0.1044
97.00 0.1655
98.80 0.2064
93.50 0.0519
95.30 0.1094
97.10 0.1681
98.90 0.2084
93.60 0.0536
95.40 0.1139
97.20 0.1706
99.00 0.2104
93.70 0.0553
95.50 0.1182
97.30 0.1731
RISER DISCHARGE
ID No. R1
Description: OVERFLOW RISER
Riser Diameter (in):
8.00 elev: 97.00 It
Weir Coefficient
9.739 he�ht: 99.00 It
Orif Coefficient 3.782 increm: 0.10 It
STAGE -DISCHARGE-> STAGE -DISCHARGE-
STAGE -DISCHARGE- STAGE -DISCHARGE-
cfs-- --
(III --cfs- - (ft) -cfs-- -- (ft) --cfs-
97.00 0.0000
97.50 1.1886
98.10 1.7629
98.70 2.1916
97.00 0.0000
97.60 1.3020
98.20 1.8413
98.80 2.2551
97.10 0.5315
97.70 1.4063
98.30 1.9165
98.% 2.3169
97.20 0.7517
97.80 1.5034
98.40 1.9889
99.00 2.3771
97.30 O�9207
97.90 1.5946
98.50 2.0587
99.00 2.3771
97.40 1.0631
98.00 1.6809
98.60 2.1262
Shanks Residence
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates
January 2004
City of Edmonds
LSA File No. 4530
0
GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL SUMMARY AND CALCULATIONS:
This project will require grading to construct the proposed driveway and utilities, including
the storm detention system. Standard erosion control measures are proposed to be used
during construction. The primary erosion and sediment control BIVIP during construction
will be proper soil stabilization methods. Exposed soils shall be stabilized by application
of effective BIVIPs that protect the soil from the erosive forces of raindrops, flowing water,
and wind. Applicable practices include, but not limited to, temporary and permanent
seeding, sodding, mulching, plastic covering, erosion control fabrics, matting, soil
application of polyacrylamide (pam) , the early application of gravel base on areas to be
paved, and dust control. The contractor shall select a soil stabilization method best suited
for the particular situation. Stock piles must be stabilized and protected with sediment
trapping measures. In addition, site containment of exposed soils shall be sustained by
using silt fence barriers along the down -slope boundaries of the site's disturbance areas.
See the site development plan for details.
Estimated grading calculations: The following grading quantity estimations were
calculated using the average slice area method. The calculations are approximate (see
attach calculation worksheet). The quantities listed are for the permitting process only and
should not be considered precise amounts for bidding purposes. The estimated grading
quantities are:
Cut: 1,700 CY
Fill: so CY
Conclusion: Included in the site development construction plans are detail grading and
drainage improvement details. With proper installation, maintenance and inspections of
the proposed construction the project should have minimal impact to the environment.
Shanks Residence
Lovell- Sauerland & Associates
January 2004
N � NP"m U
6- ' -'m iiz
City of Edmonds
LSA File No. 4530
Z
0
1
0
M
--i -n
M
C
M
0
-10
0 C
M
M Z
rL)
C
0)
0 -n
ri
M M
a
0
0 M
C C/)
9 0)
Q 0
Z r-
Z
Z
0
1
0
M
I
Grading Quantity Estimation
Shanks Residence
LSA No.4530
On -site Grading
Cut Area Fill Area Volume of
Volume of
Volume of
Volume of
Elevation at Elev. at Elev. Cut, CF
---------------------------------- — -- — ---- ------------- — ---------------------------------------------------------------
Fill, CF
Cut, CY
Fill, CY
— ------------- —
95 0 0 0
0
0
0
Z
96 50 0 25
0
1
0
0
98 110 0 160
0
6
0
0
100 110 0 220
0
8
0
M
102 110 0 220
0
8
0
104 2,500 0 2,610
0
97
0
106 9,750 0 12,250
0
454
0
108 7,000 0 16,750
0
620
0
M
rn
110 2,800 0 9,800
0
363
0
0
112 450 0 3,250
0
120
0
0
0
113 0 0 225
0
8
0
-4 K
M
45,510
0
1,686
0
rn z
JO --I
C z
APPROXIMATION:
3:
CUT = 1,700 C.Y.
CO)
FILL = 50 C.Y.
0 -n
n
M rn
0
0 M
cl)
Cn
M 0
Z
0
rn
Shanks Residence
Cit of Edmonds
y
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates
LSA File No. 4530
January 2004
I
NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE
IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT.
I JJJ WAI �, It
C fadql j Idlul sulul I
CL
-c
r
0
C)
U) C-)
-C) Lo
C5
Q3
co
Q)
co
cu
Q)
C?
co
cu
Q)
�.
Z
Z
-Z
co
a
--i
co
--.)
E3RA
March 16,2004
E04021
Mr. Scott Shanks
First Western Development Services, Inc.
1339 North 205'h Street, Suite B
Shoreline, Washington
Re: Geotechnical Recommendations
Proposed Shanks Residence
Edmonds, Washington
9802 29th Ave. W #B1 02
EvereM WA 98204
425-356-3372
425-356-3374 Mx
kLITY' Curr-Y
RECEIVED
APR - 1 2004
PERMIT COUNTER
Dear Scott:
in accordance with your recent request, E3RA, Inc. has conducted an evaluation of geotechnical
conditions at the location of your proposed residence on an open lot located in the 17000 block of
Talbot Road in Edmonds, Washington. Our recommendations are based on a limited scope of work
involving excavation of two test pits on March 8, 2004. The test pits were used to evaluate the site
n c
conditions and generally indicated that the planned project is feasible and could be co stru ted as
shown on the plans prepared by Lovell-Sauerland & Associates dated December 22, 2003, subject to
the recommendations presented herein.
Geotechnical Conditions — An E3RA engineer supervised the excavation of two test pits at
representative locations on the site. The first test pit was excavated near the planned north comer of the
residence and encountered 0.7 feet of topsoil over 2.3 feet of silt and sand with little clay FELL over 3.0
feet of brown, moist� silty SAND which was wet below 5.5 feet. The second test pit was excavated
near the planned east comer of the residence and encountered 0.5 feet of topsoil over 2.0 feet of gray
and brown mottled wet silty SAND with little clay over 3.0 feet of stiff gray SILT and SAND upon
which water was perched.
Based on these conditions and our evaluation of the site topography, it appears that materials were
previously excavated from the rear of the site and placed as fill on the front or northwest portion of the
site. A rockery of approximately 10 feet maximum height was constructed at the rear of the site to
stabilize the bank against erosion. Groundwater is generally present in die base of die gray/brown SILT
and SAND layer, which is mottled due to the periodic presence of the water.
Based on the above conditions, we evaluated a number of geotechnical concerns at the site, each of
which is addressed in the paragraphs below. If differing conditions are encountered during
construction, our office should be contacted for a re-evaluation and modifications to the
recommendations may be necessary.
pgjv� — The site has groundwater within a few feet of the planned finish floor elevation. To
allow for maximum drying of die soils prior to slab construction, we recommend that die first work by
Z
0
i
0
M
=i 9
C M
M 0
0
0
0 C:
--4 K
2: M
M Z
> Z
3:
U5
0 -Ti
n
M M
C) 7)
0 r-
0 M
C Cl)
90)
Q 0
Z r-
.AT
;U
--I
X
Z
—i
3:
C0
Z
0
1
0
M
Page 2
March 16,2004
the grading contractor involve steps to dewater die site. This can most likely be accomplished by
constructing French drains on the perimeter of the site which drain by gravity toward the western
(lowest) comer of the site.
Excavations — In order to construct the planned residence, an approximately 5 foot high cut face will be
excavated at a location approximately 6 feet in front of tile existing rockery. Although die rockery
shows no signs of instability at present it should be treated with extreme care during excavation.
Accordingly, E3RA recommends die following methods to safety conduct die planned excavation:
• Keep traffic away from the top of the excavation,
• Be sure that all excavations are in stiff, dry soils and kept as far from the rockery as possible,
• Check die surface above the excavation and rockery for cracks and fissures on a regular basis,
• Carefully observe cut face and adjacent areas prior to approaching it to work and use the hoe
bucket to dislodge any loose material if raveling occurs, and
• Minimize personnel time at die excavation face.
The concrete retaining walls in the lower level of the residence in this location are a maximum 6 feet
high and should be designed for a uniform horizontal soil pressure of 300 pounds per square foot (psf)
in order to account for the surcharge of the rockery and associated soils.
Foundations — The UBC standard foundation bearing pressure of 1500 to 2000 psf is appropriate for
use on this site. Foundations should bear at least 18 inches below lowest adjacent external grade to
protect against frost.
We appreciate the opportunity to continue working with you on this matter. Although we do not
anticipate die need, please contact us if an endorsement or additional review of the final plans is
required. As we have agreed, ORA will observe the excavation daily to comply with state law and to
allow ongoing comparison of our design assumptions with those conditions being encountered in the
field. Please contact me directly if questions should arise or you require additional information.
Sincerely yours,
E3RA, Inc.
Dean M.White, P.E.
Principal Engineer
copy: Jamieson Consulting
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates
EXPRES /[!7-J/77P-'S I
Z
0
i
0
M
-n
m
C:
M
0
--10
0 C
M
M Z
0 --1
C —Z
CD
o -n
n
m M
0
0
0 M
C: cn
K cn
M 0
�Z
r
Z
Cn
Z
0
q
0
rn
FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM
TO:
DATE:
MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION
FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE
PL&%SE WN
A ENGINEERING DIVISION DAT
rLWE SIGN
PLANNING DIVISION DATE
nEASF SM
PROJECT P,� K
SITE ADDRESS
PERMIT ADB# *DATE INSPECTED_!��
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED—,--) )"I Of— .,Ie
A field inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval
denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of
PERFORAIANCE QQNDS and the granting of:
GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
a Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector
I .
FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES
o Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector
I .
2.
3.
RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date Si
ocaprv1.doc.1:temp:b1dg: fonns 10/0 1
z
0
M
:q =-n
M
M
0
--1 0
0 C:
M
M Z
C()
0 -n
n;U
>
M M
0 U5
0 r-
M
Cn
C/)
M C)
Z r-
M
r
z
0)
z
0
i
0
M
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED
SETBA CKS .....................
FOUNDATION:
Footing ......................
Wall..........................
Pier/Porch .................
Retaining Wall ...........
Slab Insulation ..........
PLUMBING:
Underground .............
-In ...................
Rough
Commercial Final ......
HEATING:
Gas Test ....................
Gas Piping .................
Equipment .................
Commercial Final .......
EXTERIOR SHEATHING 2-c>4
NAILING .......................... C
FRAMING ..................... Vv) K
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING...
INSULATION ...................
Floor Insulation .........
Wall Insulation ...........
Ceiling Insulation ....... ----------
SHEETROCK NAILING ...
SPECIAL INSPECTION ...
C.
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY ..................
side sewer #.
0
,Ipt
Amout Paid $ Rece
q ___v,
*7 Date 'sue r fres
WaterMeterSlze 1� q_
AmountPaid Recelptil,
7�
DatePuMhaSC13—
Tile 11ii6als MTIrc M"toll R0VV#
telliporary witract
1101111)SOII, t Tzecopt
T Amount Paid
lie City.
ilispectol. fol I rv, t_1
Date Ica- cl 7.
z
0
i
0
M
--i -n
0 M
C
M
0
0
0
3: M
ITI Z
C _Z
3:
(D
0 -n
n
M M
065
0 r-
0 M
C C/)
9 C/)
M 0
Z
z
3:
Cl)
z
0
1
0
M