20040407.pdfDATE RECEIVED
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
ba y i'd ra t c
UM MAILING ADDRESS
z
3: .�2 qm 14ve t\j
0
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
Ednli,��i4ls
NAME
61-1,2.6i L
LU
1,_ ADDRESS
2
�6 t
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
M tal'l teo W 3S 1
NAME __jCBL#
1�6-14 5 Y
ir ADDRESS
0
P
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
STATE LICENSE NUMBER tAVIHAI N U
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
0 1
2'�-0.32_14u'.� -'I L�) klc
NEW
RESIDENTIAL
PLUMBING / MECH
ADDITION
COMMERCIAL
COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF USE
REMODEL
MULTIFAMILY
SIGN
E] REPAIR
G
��YDS
FENCE
( X FT
E] DEMOLISH
TANK
OTHER
GARAGE
CARPORT
RETAINING WALL
ROCKERY
FIRE SPRINKLER
FIRE ALARM
(TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
P-1?5i'den Lei
NUMBER
NUMBER OF
CRITICAL
OF
DWELLING
AREAS
STORIES
UNITS
NUMBE
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
le?i7l)i Y_14� 43
HEAT SOURCE I GLAZING % I LOT SLOPE %
PLAN CHECKf�): VESTED DATE
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
PERMIT APPLICATION: 180DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT: I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
IN INTEREST, AGREES 10 INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFX WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.'
PERMIT EXPIRES
USE PERMIT
ZONE
NUMBER 5�9 OZ
JOB UITE/APT#
ADDRESS
AME/SUB'
P PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO,
LAT N
LOT NO.
LID NO.
i
LID FEE $
TEsrP Approved
E3
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
RW permit Required
E3
Street Use Permit Roq'd
EXISTING PROPOSED
rREQUIRED
inspection Required
Sidewalk Required
E3
Q C
DEDICATION- FT
underground
... ed
13
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YES NO 13
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE
. _Wk8ki
ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY
FIRE REVIEWED BY
VARIANCE OR CU
_1� I
SEPA REVIEW
COMPLETE , EXEMPT
EXP x
LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED PROPOSED
PARKING
REO'D I PROVIDED
I,� cv�L,7.�
DATE
SHORELINE Oil ADBI I INSPECTION BOND
REC;Re POSTED
[1YES NO I S
SIGN AREA HEIGHT
ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED
REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT) PROPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.)
FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT
SIDE REAR
LOT AREA I PLANNING REVIEWED BY DAT
J..) I co I 0,�� 0 0 P11 44
11—D
CHECKED BY I TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CO UU1.11.11-^1111.
GROU P
SPECIAL INSPECTION JAREA OCCUPANT
REQUIRED LOAD
Cr
W
z
z
S
z
us
W
0
z
a
REMARKS z
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REG-D F3
X-eed /12F*3077-L__
VALUATION
�� -'/, aw - -
Description FEE
Description FEE
State Surcharge 6,z)
City Surcharge 16
Plan Chk. Deposit C
Receipt #
Total Amt. Due
Receipt #
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
G APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF I
TATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- This application is not a permit until signed by the
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND S PL Y CALL
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/tier Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OFFICIA1 S SIGNATURE DATE
:E I I OR A WEN DATE SIGNED (425)
SIGY TUR Ow ER
z""t z 260 771-0220 R
ATTEktION EXT 1333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES
Plan Check
Building Permit
Plumbing
Mechanical
Grading
Engr, Review
Engr. Inspection
Fire Review
Fire Inspection
Landscapelnsp.
Recording Fee
ON
DATE
ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW-INSPECX
PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
GREEN - ACCOUNTING
z
0
A
0
M
:q:71
0 M
C
M 0
0
4 ()
0 C:
M
M Z
—Z
0 _n
n
M M
0
0
0 M
C (n
9 Cn
M 0
Z
z
z
0
1
0
ITI
0
i
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwxLedmonds.wams
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning Building Engineering
Z�
December 29, 2003
0
0
M
Tracy Little
c ' 721 9h Avenue N =i 9
Ui
Edmonds, WA 98020
0 M
C
M 0
0
0
RE: Plan Check #03-420 0 C'
M
M z
Dear Tracy: C —Z
>
Please respond to the enclosed comments dated October 3 and October 10, 2003 U5
-n
regarding your building application. The City cannot continue to process your
application until you fully respond to all of the noted items. --i
M M
C0
0
0 M
Sincerely; C 0)
9 C/)
M
0
Z
X
z
'jA4KC/-o/oi ginaVtP;ft'-)
C/)
z
0
M
L\Temp\DST's\M aster Letters\Pls Respond
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwaci.edmondsma,us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning Building - Engineering
C.
February 17, 2004
Tracy Little
z
721 9"' Avenue N
0.
Edmonds, WA 98020
0
M
Re: Building Permit Application: 03-420
=i =n-
Site Address: 7219"' Avenue N
Expiration Date: March 19, 2004
0 irn�
C
M 0,
0
Dear Tracy:
0 0,
C
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the above referenced permit application
M
M z
will expire on March 19, 2004. According to Edmonds Community Development Code
C z
Chapter 19.00.010D, applications are only valid for a period of 180 days Unless a written
>
request for extension is submitted to the Building Official. If an application extension is
cn,
granted it may only be extended for an additional 180 days for a total period of one year.
0 -n,
If you need an extension on the subject permit application YOU Must Submit a request in
-n
writing to the Building Official prior to plan review expiration.
M M
Please be advised, once the permit application expires, the application materials and plans
U5
0
.0 M
will be destroyed within ten working days. Also, if the project is pursued in the future a
C Cn
new perm it application and new fees will be required.
M 0
z
If you have any questions, please feel free to call our offices at 425-771-0220.
;a
Xt
Sincerely,
z 't"
55
F L/
z
Marie arris6n'
z
Permit Coordinator
0
0
M
Cc: File
U1'emp\DS'1 sWaster Letters\App Due to expire 10/21 /00
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
tiep eb UJ Ub:bla
p.2
H 3.0 7
DA I t> M 100. 0 v4N
11,00
Zt L rt 16 t-,151E M -r_
u C-
X fl� T* N C, Y 7 Alf 110
I -3r -77 R r5
Pr�(>PO"JIFV
n rz I v EF s jk w,% i- r ar 11?7
ADD GUTTERS /DOWNSPOUTS
OVVNEFUCON 11RA.,
I" RESPONSIBLE
AND SPLASHBLOCKS We-
11
FOR ER0,01, 11"C'
AN D DAMAGE
S u n 0 evc F.
z
0
0
N
A
0
0
c
5. T I
QO
M
—Al
I C-1c
4
M z
r.) --I J-
n A V S 0
>
5-T 0 C-�. N
�Z�
L7
Powb5
E)c T,
M M
d
r--
rn
A.: )04,8
p
'TOT NL' 1-f I -Y. 10 -3. 8 M GA VQ
-i �!�.6
T71-8-8--
Tt 68
1�ot
10
lo�
-5)TE PL)&,N
F- F- LN I T A <-' 1-1 E: 1,; 1- E C, A t- V)
1- ot .,, f,7 c- k 2. 0, 0 C)
ove fzA G- (5�- -3, C e. 3 T21 AppRoVr
CD AS NOTED
BY ENGINEERING
A VE L
114ftlle�— --
'rgp\cy j-;,rn-T-
7A 9 T"' A -4 IE N1 w m o t,% A 46-01-
q;,5*-'775-'3'7'?q
"--T-
�l CC,
BY PLANNING
'%7
* yl
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 16, 2003
To: Interpretations File No. 2003-2
Z
0
From: Kathleen Taylor
0
M
Subject: Interpretation regarding maintenance of non -conforming buildings
=i =n-
Date Issued/Posted: OCTOBER 17,,2003
M
C
0
M 0
--1
Effective Date: OCTOBER 31, 2003 (unless appealed in a timely manner)
0
0 C:
4 K
X M
Planning staff is currently reviewing a building permit application for roof replacement of an existing
M Z
nonconforining building. The building was originally constructed with a flat roof, which does not allow
>
for adequate drainage. Subsequently the roof has become damaged. The applicant would like to replace
the flat roof with a 4:12 pitched roof. The building will not exceed the allowable height of the
0 _n
underlying zone.
;U
>
Relevant Code Sections and Previous Interpretation:
M M
0
17.40.020 Nonconforming buildings.
0
0 M
A. Definition. A nonconforining building is one which once met bulk zoning standards and the site
C Cn
9 Cn
development standards applicable to its construction, but which no longer conforms to such standards
M
Z
due to the enactment or amendment of the zoning ordinance of the city of Edmonds or the application of
71 M
such ordinance in the case of a structure annexed to the city.
B. Continuation. A nonconforming building may be maintained and continued, unless required to be
abated elsewhere in this chapter or section, but it may not be changed or altered in any manner which
Z
increases the degree of nonconformity of the building.
Cn
D. Maintenance and Alterations.
Z
1. Ordinary maintenance and repair of a nonconforming building shall be pen-nitted.
0
2. Alterations which otherwise conforin to the provisions of the zoning ordinance, its site
M
development and bulk standards, and which do not expand any nonconforming aspect of the
building, shall be permitted.
3. Alterations required by law or the order of a public agency in order to meet health and safety
regulations shall be permitted.
F. Restoration. If a nonconforming building is destroyed or is damaged in an amount equal to 50
percent or more of its replacement cost at the time of destruction, said building shall not be
reconstructed except in the confon-nance with provisions of the Edmonds Community Development
Code. Determination of replacement costs and the level of destruction shall be made by the building
official and shall be appealable as a staff decision under the provisions of ECDC 20.105.030.
City of Edmonds cQ Planning Division
INTERPRETATION 2003.2 NON CONFORM BLDGS%16.00T-03
LALIBRARYVLANNING�ECDC INTEPPREATIONWNTERPRETATIONS LOGU999
Damage less than 50 percent of replacement costs may be repaired, and the building returned to its
former size, shape and lot locations as existed before the damage occurred, if, but only if, such repair
is initiated by the filing or an application for a building permit within one year of the date such
damage occurred.
1620.030 Site development standardsfor Single Family Residential Zones.
16 30.030 Site development standardsfor Multiple Residential Zones.
1645.020 Site development standardsfor the Neighborhood Business Zone.
1650.020 Site development standardsfor the Community Business Zone.
1653.020 Site development standardsfor the Planned Business Zone.
Z
0
1655.020 Site development standardsfor the Commercial JVaterfront Zone.
0
M
16 60.020 Site development standardsfor the General Commercial Zones
16 62.020 Site development standardsfor the Medical Use Zone
16 75.020 Site development standardsfor the Master Plan Hillside Mixed- Use Zone
M
C 0
M
Code Interpretation File No. 93-4 addresses the reconstruction and restoration of nonconforming
0
0 C:
buildings. It states that any repair of damage in excess of 50% of the value of the structure shall apply to
M
all types of damage, whether the damage occurs due to a sudden calamity, or due to age and dilapidation.
M Z
If the damage is due to age and dilapidation, the time of the damage for the purposes of assessing value
C —Z
will be the time of application for a building permit. The value of the building shall be based on the
>
Assessed Value by the Snohomish County Tax Assessor. The value of repairs shall be based on fair
co
market labor and materials.
0 -n
>
Analysis:
9 Il
M M
The structure in question was constructed in 1949 prior to adoption of the City of Edmonds Zoning
0 r_
M
Regulations, so at that time there were no restrictions as to where a building could be positioned on the
C: Cn
K Cn
lot. The applicant has requested to replace the existing roof of the detached garage. The garage will not
Q 0
be demolished, and the walls of the garage will remain. In replacing the roof, its height will increase
Z
M
within the setback areas, relative to the pitch of the roof.
>
In this type of a situation, sloping the roof is primarily for maintenance purposes. The slope should be
the minimum necessary for maintenance of the structure. There will be no change to the building
>
footprint, and no additional livable space is being created.
cf)
ECDC 17.40.020.D allows the continued maintenance of nonconforming buildings, and also allows
alterations "which do not expand any nonconforming aspect of the building." Increasing the height of a
building within a non-confom-dng setback does increase the height of the non -conforming portion of the
building, but it does not affect the basis for its non -conformity — i.e. its intrusion into the setback. Adding
livable space (whether horizontally or vertically) within the setback would clearly increase the degree of
non -conformity. However, maintenance of the existing building without expanding its footprint or the
amount of livable space appears to be allowed under the combination of ECDC 17.40.020.D.1 and
2.THEREFORE, THE FOLLOWING INTERPRETATIONS ARE HEREBY ISSUED:
Page 2 of 3
INTERPRETATION 2003.2 NON CONFORM BLDGS\16.00T-03
LUBPARYWI-ANNINMECDC INTERPREATIONMINTER-PRETATIONS LOG\1999
0
0
M
c r
MAINTENANCE MAY BE PERFORMED ON A NONCONFORMING BUILDING, PROVIDED
THAT
• THE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY WILL NOT CREATE LIVABLE AREA THAT
CONFLICTS WITH THE EXISTING NON -CONFORMING ASPECT OF THE
BUILDING, AND
• IT WILL BE THE MINIMUM NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE STRUCTURE, AND
• IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS THE BUILDING WILL COMPLY WITH THE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE UNDERLYING ZONE. z
0
FOR EXAMPLE, ADDING TO THE PITCH OF A ROOF WITHIN A NON -CONFORMING i
0
SETBACK MAY BE ALLOWED SO LONG AS THERE IS NO ADDITION TO LIVABLE AREA M
(INCLUDING STORAGE SPACE), EITHER VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY, WITHIN =fi
THE SETBACK, AND TIM ROOF PITCH IS BEING INCREASED TO ENABLE THE ROOF
TO DRAIN PROPERLY.
M
0
M 0
--I C)
0 C:
APPEAL PROCEDURES M
M Z
Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Sections 20.105.010 and 20.105.020, staff 04
C:
of the text of the ECDC are appealable decisions. >
interpretations
Should anyone wish to appeal this interpretation, a written appeal, accompanied by the required appeal Cn
fee (see Planning Division fee handout) must be submitted within 14 calendar days of the date of 0 -n
n X
ssuance of this interpretation (please see above). >
i 9
M M
The deadline for filing an appeal of this interpretation is: October 31, 2003 0
0
A written appeal must contain the following: M
CD
(n
1) A reference to the decision being appealed. Q 0
2) The name and address of the person appealing, and his or her interest in the matter. Z r-
3) The reasons why the person appealing believes the interpretation to be inappropriate.
Concu e: Corid ence: >
on.6 Lence. z
co
z
0
Robe I Chave, AICP Duane Bowman
Plann i ing Manager Development Services Director 0
M
Posted: 1) Edmonds City Hall, 2 "d Floor — Development Services Department
2) Edmonds Library
3) Edmonds Post Office
Posting Date: October 17, 2003
Page 3 of 3
INTERPRETATION 2003-2 NON CONFORM BLDCjS\16.00T-03
LALIBRAWPLANNIN0ECDC INTERPRr-ATIONS\INTERPRETATIONS LOG\1999
FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM
TO:
DATE:
MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION
FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE
2 �U_, e & ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE
-7-�?LWE-31GN' . f/-// 0 ZZ-)
V z
0
PLANNING DIVISION DATE 0
rLEASE M"
PROJECT- q =-n
SITE ADDRESS- - 7,Z / 91 �'- 4-ve-_ /V
PERMIT#.2_6014- fZ.,Y&7 ADB# DATE INSPECTED
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED 6511q)'—
U
A field inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval
denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of
PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of:
k- GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
u Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector
I .
FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES
o Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector
I .
2.
3.
RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUESr GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date Sign
ocaprv1.doc.1:temp:b1dg: forms 10/0 1
0 M
C
M
0
0
0
M
M Z
J[) --i
C _Z
lin
0 _n
n X
>
M M
0 V5
0 r-
0 M
C rJ)
K Cn
M 0
Z
z
--i
X
C/)
z
0
M
E, ,
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR
DATE APPROVED
SETBACKS .....................
FOUNDATION:
Footing ......................
Wall ..........................
Pier/Porch .................
Retaining Wall ...........
z
0
Slab Insulation ..........
PLUMBING:
0
IT!
Underground .............
Rough -In ...................
ITI
Commercial Final ......
0
HEATING:
0
0 C
M
Gas Test ....................
M Z
Gas Piping .................
C z
Equipment .................
Commercial Final .......
0 -n
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
-n
NAILING ..........................
M M
FRAMING ........................
0
0 M
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING...
Cl)
Cn
INSULATION ...................
M 0
Z r—
Floor Insulation .........
;U
Wall insulation ...........
>
Ceiling Insulation .......
z
-1
:E
SHEETROCK NAILING ...
0)
SPECIAL INSPECTION ...
z
0
--I
0
M
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY ..................
Tile Initials N/IT are Milton
Tlloilipson,a temporary contract
inspector ror tile City.
47
�.l