20040710.pdfI
7
[7PERMIT EXPIRES (2
RECEIVED
USE PERMIT
ZONF NUMBER
CITY OF EDMONDS )2�)
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDHESS
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
PLAT NAMEISUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO.
La: MAILING ADDRESS R—AkTILKI i W-I' Cj :7 - I—) LID FEE $
z '2U
fESCP Approyed
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP F.W 1`011nit R0qL11f0d
0 A)F 1 13
Street Use Permit Raq [3
ully HONE EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Roquired In
ZIP TELEP Sidewalk Floquired E3
HFQUIRED DEDICATION— FT Undotground
0 Wiring reqwfed [3
NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES P V PEOUIRED
L I A- 1 0
ES NO 13 F
L 3 cc
W
Y z
t: ADDRESS REMARKS z
OWNER1CONlRAClOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE
z
oz'_ LU
CITY ZIP T�LEPHONE E'E C-7-1 0 /--C C-
Z, C L
.;? f-4 CC , s
NAME CBL is
ERING REVIEWED By �DATE
Cr ADDRESS
0
2'r)IL,
4-
FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE W
IM
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE U.
-7-70 22A1
VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION BOND
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE Y REQ'D POSTED
I I I — - I [:]YES M�1171 IS — —
0 iPo �_ SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALL05ED PROP
,0QSED
LU
_j N7)
15�ESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.)
_R Z ALLOWED pROP0,7 FRONT SID� REAR FROOT UP SID.P REAR/
COMPLIANCE OR _1> 7 z
ADDITION COMMERCIAL 0 �_o 1 5; .5 F
CHANGE OF USE 35 1 1 z
PARKING 1�01* AREA P� �NING R IE oD Y DATE
REMODEL MULTIFAMILY SIGN FIEQ'D PROVIDEC 1m, 1 0
REPAIR GRADING FENCE )" 6-�_ — �y
_� ?_ I CYDS ( X FT) REMARKS h
DEMOLISH TANK m OTHER
GARAGE RETAININGWALL FIRE SPRINKLER
z CARPORT ROCKERY FIRE ALARM
[TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
�CHECKEDBY ITYP ST UCTION OCCUPA
Up
QkL C--- �A r)al-- �y 1�, GRO P
Gi NUM13ER NUMBER OF CRIfICA 117 L
0 OF DWELLING AREAS SPECIAL INSPECTION JAREA OCCUPANT"
M z I NU REQUIREDV YES LOAD
cr STORIES UNITS MBER
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
z
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D S
-M
4 1%,�al t�
-X. -VALUATION h' .3612 3
IP7) qqq
Description FEE Description FEE
0— StateSur
Plan Check charge
HEAT SOURCE GI�AZING % OT SLOPE % Building Permit City Surcharge
) e72
PLAN CHECK NOL i V E MTD f Plumbing Base Fee
jj)E TO
L 4 Mechanical C,
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS40R' T)O
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE Grading 21v
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review -7f-2i
PERMIT APPLICATION: 180DAYS
Uj
PERMIT LIMIT. I YEAR I PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 160 DAYS Engr. Inspection 2 Ae—
SEE 13ACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit
U)
W IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
-1
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # �/Z/
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE. ARISING DIRECTLY Oil INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT 13E
DEEMED TO MODIFY WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscapelnsp. Total Amt. Due
, I I J f 5 1:;
0 NOR LIMI I IN ANY WAY THE CIIYS ABILITYTO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION."
xi Recording Fee Receipt #
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION, THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY Willi CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- I his application is not a permit until signed by the
TION, AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL Building 011icial or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION icceipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKMEN'S �RMFE�NSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
1 91 DATE
S NA)U F W r 0 T) DATE SIGNED
(425) 77,
A Lh1r)N6 :i,�- 31,11
771-0220 -
FIELE�SE`D ll!!� ATE'
WiTENfib'N' E)ff 1333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL L
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIG L F E - YELLOW INSPECTOR
OW
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PIN N R GOLD-ASSEsson
09/03 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES
z
0
Il
0
M
--i -n
M
C
M 0
0
--1 0
0 C:
M
M Z
ID —i
_z
o -n
n ;d
—4 >
x 9
M M
0
0
0 M
C
M 0
Z
z
Cn
z
0
M
r�JXP n- '1 1 'Utl ry
N11 t&U o
/E
DC: UUVr-rlCLJ VVIMIN f- UnOW
ce S -'k yl z 4- CC
SCALE:.. TWIWE
A ',.I ta C. p FOOTING DRAINS NOT
SDR 35 MATEFOL TO BE TIED IINTO
SCH 40 DETENTION SYSTEM
N-12
'r-810 HmcoR
WATER METER LOGATEP AT
15.00'
THE 5w CORNE K OF LOT 1
FAp,.�J'-�N bTH &&r (V Flag A/
$#PMED AS ED
�etbacks Recilfired ACtUal
BY ENGINEERING
a' Front
A Sides
-712 'e
^ther
Lq—vLLV EXLIL-q- L' -
PLA-Nw
JUN 2 8 2004
PFRMIT COUNTER
APPR(),V�D BY PLANNING
CITY COPY
K �
Dennis M. Bruce, RE.
M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/ Civil Engineer
July 2, 2004 RECEIVED
JUL 6 2004
z
0
0
M
Mr. Rob Michel PERMIT COUNTER
Michel Construction, Inc.
=n-
7907 - 212th Street S.W. #102
C M
Edmonds, Washington 98026
ma
0
Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation "Soils Report"
0
Proposed (2) 4 Lot S.F.R. Development
M
M z
81h
Ave. S & Pine Street, Edmonds, Washington
Z
>
r
This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation
o -n
-n
of the property at the N.E. corner of 8h Ave. S. and Pine Street, Edmonds,
Washington, with respect to the proposed 8 lot development. This evaluation
rn M
was required due to owner developer concerns, as well as City of Edmonds
0 55
0
requirements.
0 M
C: CD
9 Cn
Z
REFERENCES:
X
Survey by L.S.A.
z
Location map
X
Site plan
Cn
r- roi eUL U1 Ci HCtgt:: P Ct" y L)""Ct "W 7
Photographs Jr
CITY COw"A
BACKGROUND:
The proposed eight lot project, to be constructed by Michel Construction,
Inc., will occupy the majority of the overall property, with access drive to 7 lots off
81h Ave S.
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DESIGN & PERMIT - LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, Washington 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442
Michel Construction, Inc. 8 1h Ave. S & Pine Street
Pagetwo
CHARACTERISTICS:
Z
0
A survey of the subject property was conducted on June 12, 2004 by
L.S.A. The property is rectangular, and consists of approximately 62,510 0
frontage feet along the east side of 8" Ave. S and 179.26 frontage feet along the
north side of Pine Street. The adjoining properties, as well as the neighborhood,
consist of single family residences on similar size lots.
0 M
M
0,
0
0
C:
The subject property contains mature trees, shrubs, and lowland grassy -49
M
areas. The property is moderately sloped (less than 14%), and drains M Z
southwesterly to the existing wetland.
C 2
X
C0
-n
EVALUATION:
Visual assessments of the property at the N.E. corner of 8 1h Ave. S and
Pine Street revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress. No slides, no
settlements, no creep, nor any significant erosional degradation were observed.
This engineer has considerable experience in the immediate vicinity and
understands the foundation subgrade conditions.
Experience has proven that the subgrade soils are fully capable of
properly supporting the proposed 8 new single family residences.
This engineer evaluated the 8" Ave. S & Pine Street property on July 1,
2004. Significant clearing, grading, and drainage work had already occurred.
(see photographs).
The S.W. corner of the property is understood to be designated a W-Z., in
accordance with drainage plans by Donna Breske, P.E.
The utility work has exposed a large number of "soil test trenches"
throughout the property. Subgrade conditions were uniform.
0 -8" "Former" grasses, roots, organic silt (removed as of July 1,
2004)
8"-16" Sandy loam, medium dense
16"-4' Dense to very dense slightly sandy SILT.-
M M
—0
0
0 M
Cn
(1)
Q 0
Z
71
Z
X
Z
0
0
M
Michel Construction, Inc. / 81n Ave. S & Pine Street
Page three
Ground water was present in the southern portion of the property. See
photographs.
This engineer has reviewed drainage plans by Donna Breske, P.E. and
concurs with the system of drains and detention for geotechnical integrity.
The very dense subgrade soils will provide excellent foundation bearing
with proper drainage controls.
CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar
sites in the area, the property at 8 1h Ave. S and Pine Street is geotechnically
approved for the proposed Michel Construction 8 lot S.F.R. development,
subject to the following:
Standard reinforcing continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing
pressure: 2,000 p.s.f.
Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining
wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this
engineer.
For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure
of 350 p.c.f.
Geotechnical inspection by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete
placement.
The proposed structures can be supported on conventional continuous
and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed
above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and
Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations.
Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of
Z
0
q
0
M
—i -n
r1i
C
M
0
0
O-C
M
M Z
10-4
> Z
C/)
0 -n
n
M M
0 @)
0 r-
0 M
C Cl)
C 0)
M 0
Z
7-1
X
X
Z
--I
Z
0
1
0
M
Michel Construction, Inc. / 8 Ih Ave. S & Pine Street
Page four
eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed
rf
at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground su ace.
Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required
below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to
fill the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must
be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and
two feet below the
the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending
bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base
of the excavation.
Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be
designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of two thousand (2,000) pounds
per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may
be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above
-construction settlement of footings
design criteria, it is anticipated that total post
founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in
thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of
one -quarter inch.
Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction
between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure
acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter
condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil
or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural
fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's
resistance to lateral loading:
Parameter Design Value
Coefficient of Friction 0.55
Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f.
Where:
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot.
(2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid
density.
z
0
A
0
M
-4 -n
0 M
C
M 0
0
--I (-)
0
M
M z
V)
o -n
n
M M
0 �5
0 r-
0 M
Cn
M 0
Z
z
C/)
z
0
1
0
M
1h
Michel Construction, Inc. 8 Ave. S & Pine Street
Page five
A safety factor of at least 1 .5 is recommended for design of the
foundation's resistance to lateral loading.
SLABS -ON -GRADE:
Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native
soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils
provided these soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining
sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a
minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier
such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12
inches for sealing purposes.
PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS:
Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist
lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The
following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12)
feet in height which restrain level backfill:
Parameter Design Value
Active Earth Pressure* 35 p.c.f.
Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f.
Coefficient of Friction 0.55
Soil Unit Weight 125 p.c.f.
Where:
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot
(2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent
fluid densities.
For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall
height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be
added to the active equivalent fluid pressure).
z
0
M
Michel Construction, Inc. 8 1h Ave. S & Pine Street
Page six
The values given above are to be used for design of permanent
foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be
applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at
z
0
least 1.5 for overturning and sliding.
__4
0
M
The above design values do- not include the effects of any hydrostatic
pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be
0 M
C
placed *above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be
M 0
added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind
0
0
the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the
C:
backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures.
M
M Z
10--i
Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining
C
and I foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the
9;
Cn
walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the
be
0 -n
n
equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should
-
X
accomplished with hand -operated equipment.
rn M
0
0
Retaining Wall Backfill
0 M
C: Cn
Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation
Cn
M 0
Z
walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill
should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no
particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles
X
>
z
passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70)
percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a
drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the
z
0
retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to
i
the foundation drain system. the purpose of these backfill requirements is to
0
M
assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall as not exceeded because of a
build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General
Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement
and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls.
Michel Construction, Inc. 8" Ave. S & Pine Street
rcty� Oqvvu"
EXCAVATION AND SLOPES:
In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in
local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a
height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary
cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination
no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of
the excavatio.;. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical
engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent
cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes
should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly,
and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential
hazard.
Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any
temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be
seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve
stability of the surficial layer of soil.
DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS:
Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining
walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -
minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N,
Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert
should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for
drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the
foundation drain system.
The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed
off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to
stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed.
Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site
grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent
away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved.
Z
0
0
M
Cl)
Om
C
M 0
0
0
0 C
MM
M Z
r'.) -i I I
C _Z
F— -4
0
M
-4
rn M
0)
0 r-
0 M
C 0)
9 Cf)
Q 0
Z
Z
Z
0
0
M
E,
Michel Construction, Inc. 8" Ave. S & Pine Street
Page eight
GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL:
The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and
Z
cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious
0
4
material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any
0
materials to be used as structural fill.
Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind
0
permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying
M
C 0
soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions
M
0
-10
during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill.
0 C
M
All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content
M Z
JO
at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that
Z
moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The
moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled
ca
o -n
during the filling and compaction process.
-n
The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type,
M M
Cn
compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In
0
0 M
no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The
C Cn
9 Cn
following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill:
Q 0
Z
Location of Fill Placement Minimum RelativeCompaction
Beneath footings, slabs or walkways 95%
Z
Behind retaining walls 90%
CD
Z
Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12
0
i
0
inches of subgrade, 90% below that level
M
Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of
the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in
accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1 557-78 (Modified Proctor).
Use of On -Site Soils
If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when on -site soils
are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and
Michel Construction, Inc. / 8" Ave. S & Pine Street
Page nine
the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and
thus are moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the
moisture content of these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content.
Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and
19pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is
greater than the optimum moisture content.
Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consistof
a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The
percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that
portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve.
The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the
upper organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by
engineering inspection.
DRAINAGE CONTROLS:
The overall property at 8 1h & Pine contains upslope seepage. The road (8'h
Ave. S.) has created a long term historical "dam". Thus, the SW corner of the
property has become a man-made "moisture -zone".
Drainage plans by Donna Breske, P.E. have incorporated intercept drains,
tightlines and detention/ orifice mitigations.
Geotechnically, this engineer will provide onsite inspections to verify
proper foundation subgrade conditions exist prior to any concrete placement.
CONCRETE:
All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls,
etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of
concrete mix.
INSPECTION:
The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical
aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction:
Z
0
A
0
M
--I -n
M
0
0
0
0
M
M Z
o -n
n
MM
a
0
0 M
C cl)
9 CO)
M 0
Z
X
--I
3:
Z
--I
3:
55
Z
0
1
0
M
9
Michel Construction, Inc. 8" Ave. S & Pine Street
Page ten
Soil cuts
Foundation subgrade verification
Retaining wall, or rockery placement
Any fill placement z
0
Subsurface drainage installation
0
Tempora[y and final erosion control measures.
SUMMARY:
The proposed Michel Construction 8 lot SFR project at 8 1h & Pine
Edmonds, is geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the
recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and
requirements, and key geotechnical inspection during construction.
CLOSURE:
The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in
accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and
practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions
are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface
conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during
construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this
engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or
modify the recommendations.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call.
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. r
Geotechnical /Civil Engineer
--- I - I IN-- - M =
Dennis M. Bruce, RE.
M. S. C. M� B. A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer
December 30, 2004
City of Edmonds
121 5 1h Ave. N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Subject: Field Reports / Geotechnical 11n1pections;
Michel Construction Project 8 th and Pine
8 New Residences
RECEIVED
JAN G 120-95
ENG1NEEP,1t1(,j- [)ly1,cJ%l01q
This engineering report presents the results of ongoing geotechnical
inspections for the 8 new homes constructed by Michel Construction at 8 th and
Pine.
REFERENCES:
0 City of Edmonds approved project plans
0 Geotechnical reports by D. Bruce, P.E. July 2, 2004
0 Previous inspection reports
0 Photographs
INSPECTIONS:
This engineer has provided and continues to provide onsite geotechnical
inspections as required by City of Edmonds authorization.
Fine St. (2004-0697): This engineer verified proper placement of
compacted structural fill (crushed rock) to improve constructability on sub -
grade soils. This engineer previously verified dense native sub -grade soils
providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. The structural fill was effectively
placed as a construction expedient and is geotechnically approved.
Subsurface drainage was properly. placed in accordance with approved
plans and normal practices.
The rear soil cut required erosion stabilization and this engineer verified
proper placement of the rockery. Base rocks were properly founded in
dense native sub -grade soil. Rock size, rock linkage, and batter were
properly installed.
959 8"' Ave. S. (2004-0709): Subsurface soil bearing previously verified
and approved. Foundation installation, subsurface drains, and site grading
approve through this date (December 30, 2004).
SOILS - FOUNDA RONS - SITE DEVELOPMENr - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DESIGN & PERMIr - LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, WA 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX (206) 546-8442
Z
9
0
M
-i -n
Cn --i
3:
M
C
M 0
0
--10
0 C
--4 K
3: rn
rn z
Cn
0 -n
n
--I
M M
0 U;
r-
M
Cn
Cn
Q 0
Z
3:
Z
--I
3:
W
Z
0
i
0
M
I
City of Edmonds
December 30, 2004
Page 2 of 3
953 Qt' Ave. S. (2004-071 U Subsurface soil bearing previously verified
and approved. Foundation installation, subsurface drains, and site grading
approved through this date (December 30, 2004).
945 81h Ave. S. (2004-0712): This engineer verified proper placement of
compacted structural fill (crushed rock) to improve constructability on sub -
grade soils. This engineer previously verified dense native sub -grade soils
providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. The structural fill was effectively
placed as a construction expedient and is geotechnically approved.
Subsurface drainage was properly placed in accordance with approved
plans and normal practices.
The rear soil cut required erosion stabilization and this engineer verified
proper placement of the rockery. Base rocks were properly founded in
dense native sub -grade soil. Rock size, rock linkage, and batter were
properly installed.
933 8" Ave. S. (2004-0710): Subsurface soil bearing previously verified
a nd approved. Foundation installation, subsurface drains, and site grading
appro Ih through this date (December 30, 2004).
925 8 Ave. S. (2004-0698): This engineer verified proper placement of
compacted structural fill (crushed rock) to improve constructability on sub -
grade soils. This engineer previously verified dense native sub -grade soils
providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. The structural fill was effectively
placed as a construction expedient and is geotechnically approved.
Subsurface drainage was properly placed in accordance with approved
plans and normal practices.
The rear soil cut required erosion stabilization and this engineer verified
proper placement of the rockery. Base rocks were properly founded in
dense native sub -grade soil. Rock size, rock linkage, and batter were
properly installed.
921 8 Ih Ave. S. (2004-0713): This engineer verified proper placement of
structural fill material atop the dense native soils. As previously verified,
the dense native soils easily provide a minimum of 2,000 p.s.f. bearing
capacity. Contractor chose to place rock as an improved sub -grade
material. Placement of structural fill and compaction were inspected and
are geotechnically approved.
This engineer verified proper placement of subsurface drainage in
accordance with approved plans and good practices.
Z
0
1
0
M
C
M
0
0
0 C
M
M Z
10--i
CD
0
n
M M
0 C-0
0 r-
0 M
C/)
C/)
M 0
Z
M
Z
Z
0
i
0
M
Ll
City of Edmonds
December 30, 2004
Page 3 of 3
915 8" Ave. S. (2004-0714): Subsurface soil bearing previously verified
and approved. Foundation installation, subsurface drains, and site grading
gppLo_ved through this date (December 30, 2004).
SUMMARY: z
0
Ongoing geotechnical inspections verified proper foundation, drainage, 0
M
and rockery work through this date (December 30, 2004).
d to this site or neighboring CO --I
No adverse geotechnical impacts have occurre
properties as a result of the construction activities. 0 M
C
M 0
0
--10
All geotechnical aspects are approved through this date (December 30, 0
2004). x M
M z
Geotechnical inspections ongoing as required by City of Edmonds. C z
If there are any questions, do, not hesitate to call. 0 -n
n
M
M M
V WAS$,." 0 -0)
0
0 M
C/)
co,
M 0
Z
X
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. >
Geotechnical Civil Engineer z
JUMES 12123/
co
C.C. Michel Construction Inc. z
th St. SW 0
7907 212 #102
Edmonds, WA 98026
M
DMB:jpb
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
Ge t hnical/Civil Engineer
M. S. C. E., M. B. A.
City of Edmonds
121 5 1h Ave. N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
September 29, 2004
INS
DIVISIO"
Subject: Field Reports / Geotechnical Insme—ctions
�-81h ----
Michel Construction Project and Pine-)
8 New Single Family Residen�-es
This report presents the ongoing results of geotechnical inspections for
the 8 new residences at 8�h and Pine (by Michel Construction Inc.).
REFERENCES:
0 Geotechnical report by D. Bruce, P.E. July 2, 2004
0 City of Edmonds approved project plans for 8 new residences
0 Inspection authorization by City of Edmonds
0 Construction photographs
BACKG_ROUND:
Michel Construction has received permits for the construction of 8 new
residences at the northeast intersection of 8 th Ave. and Pine St.
This engineer prepared a geotechnical report dated July 2, 2004 with criteria for
foundation work, excavation, and rockeries.
Excavation for the project began in August of 2004 (see photographs).
This engineer provided daily onsite inspections during periods of active
excavation and foundation work.
.0714): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p.s.f. verified. "OK'to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
SOILS . FOUNDArIONS - SlrEDEVELORMENr , INSPEcrloN - DRAINAGE - DESIGN & PERml r , L EGA L
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, WA 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX (206) 546-8442
Z
0
1
0
M
--I -n
C
M
-40
0
0
im
M
M Z
3:
En
o -n
-n
4
3:9
M M
5)
0 r-
0 M
C C/)
9 Cn
M 0,
Z
X
Z
X
Z
0
0
M
City of Edmonds
September 29, 2004
Page 2 of 3
921 8" Ave. S. (2QQ4-0_7131: All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p.s.f. verified. "OK' to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approvari
plans.
925 81h Ave. S. (2004-0698): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p-s-f. verified. "OK to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approvari
plans.
933 8�h Ave. S. (2004-0710):�All excavation stable and approved. Soil
rified. "OK' to proceed with foundation formwork,
bearing of 2,000 p.s.f. ve
ement per City of Edmonds approvari
reinforcing steel, and concrete plac
plans.
81h
0 945 Ave. S. (?004-0712): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p.s.f. verified. "OK to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
0 953 81h Ave. S. (2004-07111: All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p.s.f. verified. "OK'to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
959 81h Ave. S. (2004-0709): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p.s.f. verified. "OK'to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
821 Pine St. ( 004-0697): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p-s-f- verified. "OK' to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
SUMMARY:
Geotechnical inspections verified proper work through this date
September 29, 2004.
0 The excavations for all 8 lots are stable and approved.
z
0
4
0
M
--I -n
in-
M
M
0
--10
0 C
M
M Z
C -Z
C)
0
n
M M
U)
0 r-
0 M
C CI)
9 C/)
M 0
Z r-
>
z
--I
M
C/)
z
0
0
M
0
City of Edmonds
September 29, 2004
Page 3 of 3
0 Foundation bearing for all 8 residences was verified and approved for
foundation placement.
0 Geotechnical inspections ongoing as required by City of Edmonds.
z
IT!
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call.
WAS
0
M z
S
C
>
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
ONA1. Geotechnical Civil Engineer
0 -n
M M
C.C. Michel Construction Inc.
7907 212" St. SW #102
0 M
C COI
Edmonds, WA 98026
C ly
M 0
DMB:jpb
X
z
0
IT!
I
Dennis M. Bruce, RE.
M. S. C. M. B. A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer
September 29, 2004
City of Edmonds
121 51h
Ave. N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
I I ections
Subject: Field Reports Geotechnica pkp-,�Q—t
Ct 4 8th and Pine)
Michel Construction Proje
8 New Single Family Residences
This report presents the ongoing results of geotechnical inspections for
the 8 new residences at 8 �h and Pine (by Michel Construction Inc.).
REFERENCES:
0 Geotechnical report by D. Bruce, P.E. July 2, 2004
0 City of Edmonds approved project plans for 8 new residences
0 Inspection authorization by City of Edmonds
0 Construction photographs
BACKG_ROUND:
Michel Construction has received permits for the construction of 8 new
residences at the northeast intersection of 8 th Ave. and Pine St.
This engineer prepared a geotechnical report dated July 2, 2004 With criteria for
foundation work, excavation, and rockeries.
Excavation for the project began in August of 2004 (see photographs).
This engineer provided daily onsite inspections during periods of active
excavation and foundation work.
915 Rth Ave. S. (2004-0714): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p-s-f. verified. "OK'to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
SOILS - FOUNDA7-10NS . SITED I EVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE , DESIGN& PERA417- - LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 a Shoreline, WA 98155 * (206) 546-9217 * FAX (206) 546-8442
Z
0
i
0
M
--I -n
M
M
0
--10
0 C:
--i M
M M
M Z
JO -4
C
3:
Cn
0 -n
n
M M
0
0
0 M
C: cl)
9 Cn
Q 0
Z
Z
0
Z
0
i
0
M
9
City of Edmonds
September 29, 2004
Page 2 of 3
921 8" Ave. S. (2004-0713): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p.s.f. verified. "OK to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
925 81h Ave. S. (2004-0698): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p-s.f. verified. "OK'to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
0 933 8 th Ave. S. (2004-0710): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p.s.f. verified. "OK'to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
0 945 8" Ave. S. (2004-0712): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p.s.f. verified. "OK'to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
0 * 953 8 Ih Ave. S. (2004-0711 All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p-s-f- verified. "OK'to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans,
959 81h Ave. S. (2004-0709): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p.s.f. verified. "OK'to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
821 Pine St. (2004-0697): All excavation stable and approved. Soil
bearing of 2,000 p-s-f. verified. "OK' to proceed with foundation formwork,
reinforcing steel, and concrete placement per City of Edmonds approved
plans.
SUMMARY:
Geotechnical inspections verified proper work through this date
September 29, 2004.
0 The excavations for all 8 lots are stable and approved.
z
0
1
0
M
--i -n
0 M
C
M
0
0
0
M
M Z
JD --I
C —Z
0 -n
n
0
0 M
Cn
M 0
Z
.A�
;U
--I
M
z
CI)
z
0
1
0
M
City of Edmonds
September 29, 2004
Page 3 of 3
Foundation bearing for all 8 residences was verified and approved for
foundation placement.
Geotechnical inspections ongoing as required by City of Edmonds.
z
0
0
M
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call.
M.
0 M
I WAY11 C
M
0
0
3: M
M Z
-CIM C=
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. >
ONA E:
al Civil Engineer
Geotechnic CD
0 -n
M M
C.0 Michel Construction Inc. 0
7907 212 th St. SW #102 0
0 M
Edmonds, WA 98026 C (n
9 Cn
M
Z
DMB:jpb
z
3:
CO
z
0
0
M
Dennis M. Bruce, RE.
M. S. C. E., M. B. A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer
December 30 2004 f" i" ')nn
ENGMIEEPftlo
City of Edmonds
121 5t' Ave. N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Subject: Field Reports Geotechnical I isDections
78h
Michel Construction Project �an:d P =in5e
8 New Residences
This engineering report presents the results of ongoing geotechnical
inspections for the 8 new homes constructed by Michel Construction at 8 th and
Pine.
REFERENCES:
City of Edmonds approved project plans
Geotechnical reports by D. Bruce, P.E. July 2, 2004
Previous inspection reports
Photographs
INSPECTIONS:
This engineer has provided and continues to provide onsite geotechnical
inspections as required by City of Edmonds authorization.
Pine St. (2004-0697): This engineer verified proper placement of
compacted structural fill (crushed rock) to improve constructability on sub
grade soils. This engineer previously verified dense native sub -grade soils
providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. The structural fill was effectively
placed as a construction expedient and is geotechnically approved.
Subsurface drainage was properly placed in accordance with approved
plans and normal practices.
The rear soil cut required erosion stabilization and this engineer verified
proper placement of the rockery. Base rocks were properly founded in
dense native sub -grade soil. Rock size, rock linkage, and batter were
properly installed.
959 8" Ave. S. (2004-0709): Subsurface soil bearing previously verified
and approved. Foundation installation, subsurface drains, and site grading
approved through this date (December 30, 2004).
SOIL S - FOUNDA TIONS - S1 TE DE VEL OPMEN T' - INSPEC TION - DRA INA GE - DES16N & PERW T' - L EGA L
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, WA 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX (206) 546-8442
Z
0
A
0
M
-n
M
ma
0
0 C:
M
M Z
_Z
o -n
n�
M M
055
0 r-
0 M
C cl)
90)
Q 0
Z
71
Z
--I
a:
W
Z
0
i
3
M
City of Edmonds
December 30, 2004
Page 2 of 3
* 953 8" Ave. S. (2004-0711): Subsurface soil bearing previously verified
and approved. Foundation installation, subsurface drains, and site grading
approved through this date (December 30, 2004).
* 945 8 Ih Ave. S. (2004-0712): This engineer verified proper placement of
compacted structural fill (crushed rock) to improve constructability on sub -
grade soils. This engineer previously verified dense native sub -grade soils
providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. The structural fill was effectively
placed as a construction expedient and is geotechnically approved.
Subsurface drainage was properly placed in accordance with approved
plans and normal practices.
The rear soil cut required erosion stabilization and this engineer verified
proper placement of the rockery. Base rocks were properly founded in
dense native sub -grade soil. Rock size, rock linkage, and batter were
properly installed.
0 933 8 Ih Ave. S. (2004-0710): Subsurface soil bearing previously verified
and approved. Foundation installation, subsurface drains, and site grading
approved through this date (December 30, 2004).
th
0 925 8 Ave. S. (2004-0698): This engineer verified proper placement of
compacted structural fill (crushed rock) to improve constructability on sub -
grade soils. This engineer previously verified dense native sub -grade soils
providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. The structural fill was effectively
placed as a construction expedient and is geotechnically approved.
Subsurface drainage was properly placed in accordance with approved
plans and normal practices.
The rear soil cut required erosion stabilization and this engineer verified
proper placement of the rockery. Base rocks were properly founded in
dense native sub -grade soil. Rock size, rock linkage, and batter were
properly installed.
921 8" Ave. S. (2004-0713): This engineer verified proper placement of
structural fill material atop the dense native soils. As previously verified,
the dense native soils easily provide a minimum of 2,000 p.s.f. bearing
capacity. Contractor chose to place rock as an improved sub -grade
material. Placement of structural fill and compaction were inspected and
are geotechnically approved.
This engineer verified proper placement of subsurface drainage in
accordance with approved plans and good practices.
Z
0
1
0
1�
0 M
C
M 0
0
0
0 C
--j K
M M
M Z
jo --I
C _Z
CO
o -n
n
M M
0 V5
0 r-
0 M
C C/)
9 co
M C.)
Z
M
Z
Z
0
i
0
M
City of Edmonds
December 30, 2004
Page 3 of 3
915 8" Ave. S. (2004-0714): Subsurface soil bearing previously verified
and approved. Foundation installation, subsurface drains, and site grading
approved through this date (December 30, 2004).
SUMMARY:
• Ongoing geotechnical inspections verified proper foundation, drainage,
and rockery work through this date (December 30, 2004).
• No adverse geotechnical impacts have occurred to this site or neighboring
properties as a result of the construction activities.
• All geotechnical aspects are approved through this date (December 30,
2004).
• Geotechnical inspections ongoing as required by City of Edmonds.
If there are any questions, do riot hesitate to call.
I �F.
sot
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
- - I - Geotechnical / Givil Engineer
LetPWS 12/23/ 6 oai�j
C.C. Michel Construction Inc.
7907 212 1h St. SW #102
Edmonds, WA 98026
mmo-ol
z
0
0
M
C
M
0
--I (-)
0 C
M
MZ
C
z
0 -n
M M
0 —U)
0 r-
0 M
C C0
C C/)
Q 0
Z
71
>
z
--i
x
0)
z
0
4
0
M
=I
Height Calculation Worksheet
V33 -9`
Address: C
Date:
InVector(s):
1. Datum Point: S E
2. Datum Point Elevation:
3. Avera'geGrade:
4. Maximum Elevation Aflowed: )L(,, 4,!5 veragib &ade)41 25
5. Reference Point Elevation Shot to House:
X411. (datum elevation) + RA (grade to transit level line shot to house)
6. Measurements from line shot onto house to i-dof ridge:'
T,3 -1.5
I
TOW
7. Actual Elevation: 2 r-jq,89, (reference point elevation) +;11,ils (measurements
from #6) 0 Ct!S
Conclusion:
ej it,- Ocjs_ (actual) is gjreaterlfe—slsthan;�,I 1, 5 (allowed); therefore the house is/
is not over the height requirement per ECDC 16.20-30 requirements
0
0
M
Mar 28 06 09:31a D. Bruce, P.E. 206-546-8442 P.1
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
M. S. C. M. B. A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer
March 25, 2006
City of Edmonds
1h
121 5 Ave. N
Edmonds, WA 98020
FINAL Report - Geotechnical Inspections
Subject:
Michel Construction, Inc. 8 Now Homes
8th and Pine, Edmonds, Washington
915 8th Ave. S I Permit No. 2004-0714 945 8th Ave. S I Permit No. 2004-0712
953 8"Ave. S / Permit No. 2004-0711
921 8th Ave. S I Permit No- 2004-0713 -0709
th 959 e Ave. S / Permit No. 2004
925 8 Ave. S I Permit No- 2004-0698
933 81h Ave. S / Permit No. 2004-0710
-0213 (final report submitted June U, 2005)
E121 Pine St I Permit No. 2004
This engineering report presents the final results of ongoing geotechnical
th and Pine in
inspections for the 8 new homes constructed by Michel Construction at 8
Edmonds, Washington. NOTE: Final report dated June 14, 2005 completed inspections
at 821 Pine St.
REFERENCES:
a City of Edmonds approved Project Plans
ion reports by D. Bruce, P.E.
* Geotechnical and inspect
0 Site photographs
INSPECTIONS:
This engineer provided on -site geotechnical inspections as required by City of
Edmonds in accordance with special inspection agreements. Geotechnical inspections
occurred gggy during key aspects of excavation, foundation preparation, fill placement,
and grading activities.
subsurface drainage, rockery construction
The following summaries refer to all 7 homes listed above (821 Pine St. already
completed).
Excavations: The excavation for all 8 homes encountered dense native sub -
grade soils as anticipated by the geotechnical investigation and report.
RECEIVED
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DESIGN A PERZIT - LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, WA 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FA
I)EVELOPMENT SERVICES CTF;.
CITY OF EDMONDS
z
0
A
0
M
W
Mar 28 06 09:31a D. Bruce, P.E. 206-546-8442 p.2
City of Edmonds
Re: Michel Construction, Inc.,
March 25, 2006
Page 2
All excavations were stable and are approved.
a Soil Bggn
�ng: This engineer verified dense native sub -grade soils easily
providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. Subsequent foundation formwork
reinforcing steel and concrete placement occurred in accordance with City of
Edmonds approved Plans and good practices. Approved.
0 Fill Material: No significant quantities of fill material were required for
geotechnical purposes. Contractor brought in localized amounts (less than 10
cubic yards per lot) and placed as a sub -base in order to optimize foundation
formwork procedures. All placement of fill material is in accordance with this --
engineer's geotechnical inspections. Approved.
Rpf keiy Construction: This project required a number of rockeries both between
lots and at the up -slope east portion of the project (see Project Plans and
photographs).
-grade
This engineer _vedfied the following: Base rock embeddment in dense sub
soil, rock linkage, rock size, rock chinking, drainage zone, face batter, and final
"blending in" with existing grades.
All project rockeries comply with approved Project Plans, this engineer's on -site
recommendations and normal good practices. All rockeries are approved as
constructed.
Subsurface Drainage: This engineer inspected and verified placement of
subsurface drains in accordance with City of Edmonds approved Plans and good
practices. All subsurface drainage is geotechnicallyap _
pEoved.
Erosion Control: Contractor properly established temporary erosion control
measures consisting of: Rocked construction entrance, siltation fencing, straw
bales as required, inlet catch basin filter socks, and diligent. cleanup. All
temporary erosion control measures were properly maintained throughout the
project.
Permanent Erosion Control Measures: Perm'anent erosion control measures
have been properly established for the entire 8-home project: Final surficial
grading has been completed, all driveways have been paved, rockedes
completed, landscaping consisting of lawn, shrubbery and small trees have been
properly installed. Additionally, the native growth zone at the southwest portion
of the overall property appears to comply with City of Edmonds approved Plans.
Z
0
1
0
M
P.E. 206-546-8442 P.3
Mar 28 06 09:31a D. Bruce,
City of Edmonds
Re: Michel Construction, Inc.
March 25, 2006
Page 3
installed. There are no
All permanent erosion control measures have been
rth surfaces on the project. Approved.
geotechnical instabilities or exposed ea
SUMMARY: z
0
s have been properly completed,
a All special geotechnical inspection item
01
M
including permanent erosion control measures.
by D. Bruce, P.E.
0 This report completes the geotechnicai inspections
0
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. M
C
rn 0
0
00
C
rn
M Z
C z
C/)
0
17405 -n
-n
ONA16
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M M
Geotechnical Civil Engineer
0
0 M
C 0)
DMB:abj C ch
M
0:
cc: Michel Construction, Inc. Z
3:
z
CO
z
0
0
M
QEagle Eye Consulting Engineers
PO BOX 523
Olalla WA 98359
C:206 356-7790
P:253 857-4939
MICROFILM
August 18, 2004
0
To: Michel Construction
0
7907 212 SW 9102 M,
Edmonds, WA 98027
Re: Michel Single Family Home
M
C
959 8" Ave M a
0 to
Edmonds, Washington 98026 -40
0 C
-4 C
:3: M,
M z
EECE # ED04-08 C —z
-261 >
Client's Reference Nurnber# 04
IAQC
This project is approved for " Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, Mechanical, V co,
0 -n
and Energy " Permit only. The drawing review has been completed and accepted for n
permit with the Approved Stamped drawings returned to the City of Edmonds on August m rn
18,2004. Cn
0
0M
t, Fire C CD
Your plans are being reviewed concurrently with the Building Departmen co
Department, Zoning Department and Public Works Engineering. Changes, clarifications
M 0
:�zr
nt plan
or additional corrections may be required subsequent to the Building Departme
review, when comments are received from the other concerned departments.
z
Should you have any inquiries regarding this letter, please Hoyt Jeter at (253) 857-4151
Cn
between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm. z
0
_4
M
City of Edmonds
By:
fiooyt J(Aer, PJ/
President
FINNL'' ORM
PROJECT. A'
PP
TO:
DATE.
`.`-��MEMO To:,,.�:.PERMIT C OORDINATOR: BU ILDING DIVISION
FIRE DEP rmrz T DATE
M: AW _N
MX&SE SIGN
z
14,
NGINEERJNG DIVISION,PAT—E
?LrA.Sr SIGP
PLANNING' DIVISIO N'DATE
-n
OLE.Asli Cm
.Sl
rn
M
TI:
0
m
C)
0 c:
7777=
8 INSPECTED
M
M Z
.;�DATE
c: —Z
D E S RIP` ION. 017� WORKTO BE, INSPECTE
C T D
_n
�A, field i fion -was -,conducte �'to., etermine,complialled wit ��app �P,!!
nspec I'
-n;u
S 10
t .,uw,��vibj t' Ar.Onl.,J t6 aboVe sig ed - Department to!.,thc e, f
hat, theee are A 10US.., n
M M
40C
PERF ORMANCE BONDS. -and th'.
egraptifig o
cl)
m
c: c/)
9 cn
m
RANTTINALTROJE CYAPPROVAL
z
m
m
z
`i':GRAW��jkoj8dt APPROV,AL WIT-11CONDITIONSN6TED
U)
.;::C6p Of CON DITJ[ONS:�'0!; p ctor:
P'l t
z
m
INSPECTION JSSM1 S:�.
Aiy�bf'CQRREi CTIONIN z.'.' E.7given to�owiierl�'c'oiitr*al"b"t*"o"t,b.y''.,i",
A!_
-3
D,OUTSTtANDING� ISSUE 6kA -INAL PR0JEC-T'APPR( At
SPPICITTE S
8ignature
N
r4
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED
-04(
SETBACKS .....................
FOUNDATION:
Footing ......................
Wall .......................... 77
J Pier/Porch .................
Retaining Wall ...........
Slab insulation ..........
PLUMBING:
Underground .............
Rough -In ...................
Commercial Final ......
HEATING:
Gas Test .................... _MT
Gas Piping ................. MT
Equipment .................
Commercial Final .......
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
NAILING ..........................
fv\'S
FRAMING ........................
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING ...
INSULATION ...................
Floor Insulation .........
Wall Insulation ...........
Ceiling Insulation .......
SHEETROCK NAILING ... T_
SPECIAL INSPECTION ...
VA
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
- 6(4"
FINAL APPROVAL FOR I�T
OCCUPANCY ..................
Side Sewer q
V00-- AmoutPaid$ Receipt t5q3ce
DateLsSued-<27119105- r,.xpires 001(JCA-
U
WaterMeterSize
Amount Pafd-)Y-0-�_ Receipt fka"2�&
Date Purchased
ROW
'I'lic iiiiti,,ils NTF zire Miltoil m o u n It Pa! d $ t 1;
'I'llollipsoll"I tellipon'll'), coiitl*,Ict
illspector .1,01- tile City. I Daie
z
0
11
0
M
4 -n
M
M
0
—40
0 C
--i K
2: M
M Z
JO -4
C
Cn
0 -n
n
MM
0
0
0 M
C cl)
9 Cn
Q 0
Z
z
Cn
z
0
1
0
171