20040837.pdfDAIE RECEIVED, 7, .3 / 0-4 [PERMIT EXPIRES
USE PERMIT
70NE
CITY OF EDMONDS N U M B E R
'JOB SUITE/APT#
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION ADDRESS 102,3 ('0,U) ��,7'
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS 6D�o-rtdo
-1-L-k-oo & . Lj PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO,
WM MAILING ADDRESS LID FEE $
Z IESCP Approved
3: PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP Rw Permit Rnituirod 11
0 /�Irc _� Street Use Permit Hart'd 13
CITY ZIP LEPHONE EXISTING - PROPOSED Inspectictr Hequited
Sidowalk Roquired
REQUIRED DEDICATION- FT Undotgrotind
9,�re q,2 S�- 7 7 If 7 Wiring requited
NAZ METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF F �TURES PRV REQUIRED
YESA NO
31 cc
(;N(\.�,A Ilk J\ Uj
Z
ADDRESS REMARKS Z
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE 0
Z
cc o x i3c4> UJI
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
q2-, - 74 our
NAME CBL#
7) `IVR-L;V�
ENGINEERING REViEWE[JiBY DATE
it ADDRESS
0 1411. r_m
s FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE ut
T M
Cl Y zip TELEPHONE cc
0 73
tA)n qejj- lft��
RIANCE OR CU SHORELINE 1111 A111111 INSPECTION BOND
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHE D BY REO*D POSTED
_Q e (
CAj 11"!/
11) 1 OYES NO S
1") Ll 4! K_ Y�A eq SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPLETE , E/7T ALLOWE DPROPOSED ALLOWU PROPOSED
W ((yr) g-q 1-6
. (-) (,) � e:)
A EXP
LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
2'-'NEW 2e*4RESIDENTIAL P011PLUMBING MECH ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT,,- SIDE, REAR FRON� LJ�SIDE/ REAR f
->
COMPLIANCE OR
COMMERCIAL V i ZE
ADDITION CHANGE OF USE IN a 3C Z
PARKING LOT AREA t7iiNNING RaWj :3
JJD
REMODEL 1:1 MULTIFAMILY SIGN REX I PRC7ED 1(?' �/Y DATE 0.
FENCE Y60
REPAIR CYDS x FT) REMARKS 1\
DEMOLISH TANK OTHER
ARAGE RETAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER
Z Q2/6CARPORT El ROCKERY El FIRE ALARM
T-L�
(TYPE OF BUSINESS�OR ACTIVITY"�E IN:
% C1 e4j,. CHECKED By PE OF,"3TRUCTION OCCUPANT.
GROUP
U) 7n-
w NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL3� T7Y
f3 OF DWELLING AR SPECIAL I( OCCUPANT
NSPE 10 MARA
M
0 STORIES UNITS NU REQUIRED LOAD
YES
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
Lj/ REMARKS Z
f PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/IBC1091IRC109 FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D
r.4 Ilk r4XqC,_ eUlb f)
0 X 303�,
%Ir�
VALUATION
$
-TA U
wa Description FEE Description FEE
Plan Check State Surcharge
HEAT, SQURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % Building Permit City Surcharge
PT �A
PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE Plumbing Z Base Fee
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
M PERMIT APPLICATION: ILIODAYS
W
PERMIT LIMITI YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
U) *APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
(n
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMI. ESS THE CITY OF
M EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENT S FROM ANY AND
ALI. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OFINHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIHECTLYOR INDIFIECILY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMI1 SHAI I N01 HE
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
01 Noll LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS A131LITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION
x
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READTHIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THEOWNER I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC
TION AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
IN Vi6LATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 113.27.
DATE SIGNED
-71
Mechanical
Grading
2�
Engr. Review
FEngr. Inspection
; () C)
Fire Review
Fire Inspection
Landscapoinsp.
Recording Fee
CALL
FOR INSPECTION
(425)
771-0220
ATTENTION //- " EXT 1333
IT IS UNLAWFULTO USE OR OCCUPYABUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNI ILAFINAL
INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE ANDAPPROVALOR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCU-
PANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109/IBC110/IRC110.
Plan Chk. Deposit
Receipt # Z/
Total Amt. Due (CO,
- 4 1
I Receipt # L-R- f 3 ( " /
APPLICATION APPROVAL
This application is not a penna until signed by tire
Building Oflicial or his/hof Deputy and Fees are paid, and
I eceipt is ackno wledged in Space provided
;n�ijki s,�51,9NATVAF DAL E
W,
A DATE
4'FD BY
09/03 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES
OHIGINAL FILE YELLOW INSPAU10
PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR
4
Z
0
1
0
M
--i -n
0 M
C
M 0
0
10
0 C:
4 K
:E M
M Z
:E
0)
0
M M
0(6
0 r_
0 M
C C/)
9 U)
M 0
Z
Z
U)
Z
0
i
0
M
I
0
R� I
5 1T E� P L
-rH r= w. Z-o' air *I-0-j z'T-AjLorz Ti-z A. cT,5
CITY OF EFUMON05
5 WO Iq 0 M 1-3 W CO.. \A/A.
06 r r 0 0 C O(M d6 0 2-
JUL 2 3 2004
PERMIT CouNTER
CA--%py
T17'
5
N<
Zone Comer Al Flag Al /Ire
"I
Setbacks Reauired Actual
U33 307-
Front
L - lo 1h
Sides 1-1� \ ,
Rear
Other a q,, gz,
Height
A 0 EP,
PPR V BY PLANNING X.N\)
'0
Nz
01 �? F- --
d�v
0
10
HE)CHT C-ALC5
\00
Av Z)
Ao,
15 X. C, T3,
70p 8711q
0 ! 7v-
C L
TOTA,
;0i, 0
I;kq.y MA;K
)MpSR\j1Ev-n 5ulzrAcr
z
0
0
M
=i:9
0 M
C
M
0
--10
0 C:,
3: M
M z
JO
—z
CD
0 11
-n
M M
C—D
0 r-
0 M
CD
Cn
Q 0
Z
z
0)
z
0
0
M
TOM�-SU5
R y) r\10ND5, Wk. ?8 0 10
0 — V" 1-,WE --i , I
Ila T - 771- 787-3
TH5 \44. 1. eu 0' 0 Fr� L-OT TA?L OF1 TIZ ACT-5� Nikj
f uln,
CITY OF E�UMOW115
3 JqOM 1--3W \A/A.
02— RE:CEIVEL)
SEP - 9 20
AS' NOTE[) PERMIT COUA
t-N I EERING
B',t
Date'.
s c k%-G; -2 0'- a
(copr
qj 0
-7-c-, f
2410
6
f d,
01
§1
;> (V
-10 0 N!
ry
ER
4�' 0 lr .
110
HEICHT (ZALC5
C )00,
TOTA L. S 7 7. A-i 77.9
cl Vo
I A9.7 MAX
Y, Rc.LJ5 qb )mp5R\JlG0Ln 5L)IMACE
3il- "i'IGHTLINE
ACCEFAFk.
MATERIAL
SDR 35
SCH 40
N - 12,
A%,r u m iq r F81 0 HANCOR
X. c, r3,
Top 87,14 TOf�I�SU5 NICHOL!50N
WA,
2 0 - V Nje 5, J7 J\JOWD5,
9 a 5- 771- 78 7"b
z
0
A
0
m
I
STANDARD
IOWNER: tj �' C_ ka 1 r-, 6
DETENTION S YSTEM- WORKSHEET
(5000 SF OR LESS) UY,
�� 2
1� ' 17
- FCALC. BY: e
tADDRESS: PHONE!
DATE:
'S. ( L- Sr.> I - DIA. PIPE LENGTH IFICE
IMPERVIOUS SUFACE AREA c,2 206K - � I P I P E
FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED TO DETENTION SYSTEM
OCKING LID (TYP-)
IM ELEV.-
RIM ELEV. DETENTION PIPE LENGTH I F) 6" Min. clearance
I Measured from top of RIM ELEV.-
FINISHED Conc. box or riser.
GRADE
TIGHTLIN
I, MINIMUM
0.5% TO 1.0% SLOPE
S$f laeftoo--g-
-10 X-G�VEYANCEtt*_
9LT
1kal 01 Ck/
ELEV. ELEV. -
L UTLET
CONTROL
UPPER CATCH BASIN
9. IN. RIFICE
ROM CONTROL CB
IX2'Xl 2" DEEP CONTROL CATCH BASIN
(4'-6- QUARRY SPALLS OR EQUAL) IN. 6" COVER
FROM CONTROL CS
7; -
E
C
IN. 6'
C CONTROLCB
SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR
TO SPREADER TRENCH r,,,TRENCH SHALL BE LINED
WITH MIRAF1 & ON TOP
PERF. PIPE SHALL . BE
I
LEVEL & CAPPED AT ENDS /8* WASHED DRAIN ROCK
RIPRAP OUTLET . SPREADERTRENCH
OA
CITY STORM
CONVEYANCE
SYSTEM
SPREADER TRENCH
SHALL BEA MIN.
OF 10'LONG AND
PERPENDICULAR
TO CONTROL CB. W
W
U
W
W
NOTES TIGHTLINE AND DETENTION
1, CALL ENGINEERING DIVISION (771-0220 EXT. 1326) 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR A APPROVED BY
SYSTEM INSPECTION BEFORE BACKFILLING AND FOR FINAL INSPECTION& j
2, Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the responsibility of the property 11
owner. Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from catch basins to allow proper operation. DATE
The outlet control orifice must be kept open at all times. L
L'i
LU
0
LU
CL
'5
r
T H'rz. W 'e- 0' r LG 7 3 T-A L o rt TfZ x c7-Y
CITY OF E�vmok[15
.5 NO jq 0 M I -'I W CO.. \A/A. RF—CEIVED
Po-re.O.f 4 00�5 9�:-j 066 663 OZ—
Al"
ALL EXPOSED SURFACES TO
s C h\-G; -2 c>'� c) BE COVERED WITHIN 2 DAYS
C-�(do tr -k, = 1-7 S- c /
-7 6
r
ll�;4 Ism . 5 zws�t- sl UJ3 -O(L
-T0 ol
C
9-
4 ;�,
-\p 01
J-
u 6t e�P q
cl\
SEP 9 29A
PERMIT COUNTER
U,
-19
Z
(6/ t
r
C7
.7
APPROVED AS NOTED
�VS BY E GINEERI CG
tpl
Ir Ai ry
0�y
x
I
PrOf ovs?)
Date:
HEIC,HT 0-ALC5
0 A, - m -3
n - 78. T-
C 00, L
v
11) 0
TOTA k- S 7 7. 11 T7.9 M
RMIT ;Lq'o
:� &J. T m AX
HT-OP��!X( PEA
J,
AND RED
P6 63 -7 0
C001 aQc.-C A I YJ M A 5 PH* L;T VVfmALv\l
-, N�l
VATUM
CA LL fb?— 12AS;F— A PrTf L- I MSPeCXL613S
-rop 87,lq 5ON
TOWI�SVS NIV-K)LZ
T;Z 0 - V" N\je -5, a)? J\JOND5, WA. M020
c-
z
0
i
0
m
=i 9
3:
m
c
m 0
0
--lo
0
3: M
rn z
cj)
0 -n
n
m rn
0 —C/)
0 r-
0 m
c/)
c/)
rn 0
Z
z
c/)
z
0
i
0
m
MICROFILM
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 13, 2004
To: Street File: 1031 Grandview
From: Meg Gruwell, Senior Planner
Subject: Determination of Two Lots at 1031 Grandview Street
This memo is in regards to 1031 Grandview Street, more formally described as Lot 3 of Taylor
Tracts, which has been deten-nined to be two lots.
The real estate agent for 1031 Grandview Submitted a letter on March 5, 2004, requesting a
determination as to whether there were two lots at 1031 Grandview, Edmonds. His letter stated,
and the documentation was attached, that the westerly 60 feet was transferred on February 9,
1954. The owners lie represented purchased the westerly 60 feet in October 15, 1958 and the
easterly part in March 1969.
I had also gathered some inforrilation rrom our archives for a potential purchaser of the property,
regarding a setback adjustment. The site plan with that file (#A-1987-8) shows that the addition
is squarely over the middle of the lot, and shows what the applicants.state is a "hobby shop" with
carport (see attached site plans).
I submitted this information to our City Attorney. He n,otes that the lots were created prior to the
cut-off date for subdivisions of December 31, 1972, so two legal lots were created. These lots
were at some point rendered nonconfori-ning when zoned RS- 12, which requires a 12,000 square
foot minimum lot size. Fle also notes that the lots have been in common ownership and therefore
would have been "combined'.' pursuant to ECDC 17.40.030(C). The lots have also been used in a
manner consistent with combination — that is, used as a single lot since you cannot have a
building which straddles the lot line.
Our City Attorney further states that the property may qualify for the exception created by ECDC
17.40.030 (D)(1) if all of the criteria can be met. Tile only criterion that was in question was
subparagraph "c" referring to the destruction of "housing stock."
To meet tile criteria allowing the property to be considered to be two lots, no "housing stock" can
be tom doNvn to create an opportunity to divide the lots. So long as it can clearly be shown that
no portion of tile structures crosses the intervening lot line or, alternatively, that no "housing
stock" is being destroyed to allow tile separation of tile lots, the property can be considered to be
two building lots. For example, if a part of the afore -mentioned addition (larger house) was
encroaching oil the lot line but was removed (leaving the existing "housing stock" intact), this
would meet the requirements or tile code.
City ofEdnionds c-Q Community Services
Z
0
i
0
M
Mr. Tom Nicholson, who has since purchased the lot, and Mr. Vince Norberg, his builder, have
been in discussions with tile city about the lot at 103 1, Grandview Street. They provided a
preliminary copy of a survey done by Jeffrey'rreiber or Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc.,
dated April 14, 2004, which showed that tile addition did straddle tile lot line.
Further, with building permit number BP-2004-0409, they have demolished the addition that
straddled tile line and brought the older portion of tile home back to its earlier footprint. They
have also restored tile kitchen in the house, so that it is a complete single-family residence. They
also removed tile accessory structures on the site under separate demolition permits.
The owner now mects ai I of the criteria in Edmonds Community Development Code section
17.40.030.D. 1, which are as follows:
1. In an RS zone, such nonconforming lot inay be sold or otherwise developed as any other
nonconforming lot pursuant to thefollowing conditions and standards:
a. The lot area of the nonconforming lot is not less than the ininitnuin lot area
specified in the table below [8,400 squarejeetfor RS-12 zonelfor the zoning district in
which the subject property is located, and
Comments: According to the preliminary copy of the survey done by Jeffrey Treiber of
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc., dated April 14, 2004, the dimensions of the overall
lot are 125 feet by 140 feet for a total of 17,500 square feet. The westernmost 60 feet
provides a lot area of 8,400 square feet, with the easternmost lot being 9,100 square feet.
b. Cotninunityfacilities, public utilities and roads required to serve the
nonconforming lot are available concurrently with the proposed development, and
Tile area is adequately served by the above.
C. Existing housing stock will not be destroyed in order to create a new buildable
lot, and
Tile owner has retained the old home on the easternmost lot and has removed the
addition that straddled the lot line.
d. The proposed development of the lot is generally consistent with the character
of the surrounding neighborhood.
The owner plans to build a new home on the westernmost lot that will be a two-story
home with 2,621 square feet with a 460 square foot garage according to the building
permit that has already been submitted (Plan Check number PC-2004-0346). This is
much larger than most of the homes on this street, but similar in character to the new
homes being constructed in the neighborhood. The older home, which is smaller and
onc-story, is similar in character to the older homes in the neighborhood.
2
z
0
i
0
M
-n
M
M %a
0
0
0 C
—j K
3: M
M z
JD --i
C _Z
X
o -n
n
M M
0
0
0 M
C CD
K Cn
M 0
Z
M
z
W
z
0
1
0
M
Therefore, the westernmost 60 feet of lot 3, Taylor Tracts, also known as 1031 Grandview Street
is considered to be a legal nonconforming lot by meeting the criteria of ECDC 17.40.030.1) and
the applicant may build one single-family dwelling unit on that lot.
cc: Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Ross Beckley
Tom Nicholson, Owner
0
0
0
0
M z
CI)
o -n
M
M
C/)
0
0 M
C CO
9 CI)
M 0
CI)
z
0
0
3
Height Calculation Worksheet
Address:
Date:
Inspector(s):
1. Datum Point:
2. Datum Point Elevation: c)
3. Average Grade: -Ctck
.4. Maximum Elevation Allowed: M.IL &ade):+" 25'."— �X4
javerago
5. Reference Point Elevation Shot to House:
/t3 (datum elevation) + .5,, 9_ (grade to transit level line shot to house) 4 0.5; 9,
6. Measurements from line shot onto house to r6of ridge:
Total
7. ActualElevation: JOS�X (reference point elevation) +lq,4'(, .(measurements
from #6)= 17A.
Conclusion:
--(actual) is greater/ less than 1.9A q (allowed); therefore the house is/
7
is not over the height requirement per ECDC 16.20.30 requirements
z
9
0
M
41, c. 1 S911
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
1215TH AVENUE NORTH -EDMONDS. WA98020 - (425)771-0220 -FAX (425)771-0221
Website: wwadedmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
March 2, 2005
Thomas Nicholson
920 8"' Ave S. "ITY CO"n
Edmonds, WA 98020 U X-Y
Re: Building Permit: 2004-0837
Site Address: 1023 Grandview St.
Expiration Date: 10/08/05
Dear Mr. Nicholson,
The purpose of this letter is to inforin you that the last reinaining inspection on your
project is a final inspection(s). The final inspection(s) detennines that there are no
outstanding life -safety issues and approval allows the City to close your permit file.
The City considers the final inspection to be one of the most important inspections
conducted on a project. In order to grant final approval the following must be complete:
smoke detectors, house numbers, guardrails, liandrails, sel f-c lose doors between garage
and residence, egress from sleeping rooms, safety glazing, weather-stripping, any
Engineering department requirements etc. Of course not all of these things may
specifically apply to your project but it does give you ail idea about the kinds of things
that must be complete as well as some itenis that do not need to be installed Such as:
paint, carpet, moldings, wallpaper, etc. Please be advised pennits expire one year from
the date of issuance. if you will need more time to complete the work, permits can be
renewedprior to expiration for one half fees. if tile pennit expires without a filial
approval granted by the Building Inspector, full fees are required in order to renew tile
permit. This can be very costly to You and we strongly encourage you to check your
permit expiration date and call for tile required final inspection(s). Note: If more than
one department is required to final your project, this is noted on your Job Card.
Please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220 if You have any questions.
Sincerely,
JoAnne Zulaur
Permit Specialist
i.vrenip\DST's\N4as(cr
incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister ON - Hekinan, Japan
Z
0
I
0
M
W
FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM
TO:
DATE:
MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION
FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE
PLEASE SIGN
ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE
'ZI I. �1111S;G'N'
PLANNING DIVISION DATE
PLEASESIGN
PROJECT
SITE ADDRESS— 6 .2,-3 rA
PERMIT # U0469�.. ADB# DATE INSPECTED
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED Sr_'_7�
-approved plans. Final approval
A field inspection was conducted to determine compliance with
denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of
PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of:
GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
0 Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector
I .
FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES
Fi Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inpector
I .
2.
3.
RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date Signature
I:teiiiii:bldg:t'ortils:ocal)i-N,I 3/25/04
z
0
i
0
M
q =_n
0 M
C
M 0
0
--q0
0 C:
--I K
3: M
M Z
JO
r
J)
0 _n
n;U
>
M M
0
0
0 M
C U)
K C/)
M 0
Z
X
z
C/)
z
0
1
0
M
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED
SETBACKS .....................
FOUNDATION:
Footing ......................
Wall..........................
Pier/Porch .................
Retaining Wall ...........
Slab Insulation ..........
PLUMBING:
Underground .............
Rough -In ...................
Commercial Final ......
HEATING:
GasTest ....................
Gas Piping .................
Equipment .................
Commercial Final .......
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
NAILING..........................
FRAMING........................
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING ...
INSULATION ...................
Floor Insulation .........
Wall Insulation ...........
Ceiling Insulation .......
SHEETROCK NAILING ...
SPECIAL INSPECTION ...
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY ..................
The initials MT are Milton
Thompson, a temporary contract
inspcetor for tile City.
C:> 1� -,
)_ 0- C� 0 4-
YA **-r .-&t
r)
ZZ
-7-7
-75-
11)/11/0
z
9
0
M
-4 -n
C/)
M
ITI
0
0
M
M z
c
0 _n
ri
M M
0 _C1)
0 r-
0 M
Cf)
C/)
M 0
Z
r
z
cf)
z
0
1
0
M
W.,