The URL can be used to link to this page

20040939.pdfil DATE RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS JAMES .11, IRWIN cr MAILING ADDRESS U.1 z R' 2507 N.W. 202nd STREET 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE — SHORELINE 98177 206-542-9191 NAME li— L) JAMES R. IRWIN & ASSOCIATES F- ADDRESS y U cc 2507 N.W. 202nd STREET CITY ZIP TELEPHONE SHORELINE 91 206-683-4592 NAME I C8L �-Ieiq 4/ _j I PERMIT EXPIRES 46-' USE PERMIT ZONE �100 NUMBER JOB SUITEIAPT# ADDRESP I 7 ff- PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO, LOT NO, LID NO. LID FEE f ESCP Approved PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP RW Permit Required street use Permit Roq'd EXISTING — PROPOSED inspection Required SidewalK Requited REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT unuel9fuluju Wiring required METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PYEOUIRED to T YES NO REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR HESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROODRAINAGE tj� ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE 4�0: ADDRESS 0 ei� Z/ FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE 0 PHONE L) —7 - CITY —LICE VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADBI INSPECTION BOND STATE NSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DA:rE CHECKED BY REQjik POSTED I DYES No S T SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPLETE , EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED OSED 13 1 PROP Lu 4342-098-019-0002 �10111 EXP 0 70 NEW RESIDENTIAL 19 PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED S I S (Fr.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT) ALLOWED PROPOSED, /VPffC?NT&9+BE pf HO T 6"rftW�RM k ADDITION E] COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR O/C /1 oe .00, .11 El CHANGE OF USE ) 115� I ; , 10 o 1!;�� 15, tO L 0 PARKING LOT AREA REVIEWED BY DATE REMODEL MULTIFAMILY SIGN Rq;:n-D PROVIDED GR 6 FENCE I 16600l REPAIR CYDS ( 6x 110m REMARKS OTHER F-1 DEMOLISH TANK r_1 GARAGE o RETAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER OXAlelt-1-67- z CARPORT ROCKERY E] FIRE ALARM E (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: rr A NEW DUPLEX RESIDENCE CHECKED BY I TYPE, �OST UCTION E occup U GROUP in uj NUMBER 07 P�jz� I NUMBER OF CRITICAL OF DWELLING AREAS SPECI JAREA -rejn-11L., AL INSPECTION OCCUPANT 0 STORIEs2+11SMT 2 NUMBER 99-31 IREQUIRED YES LOAD ;Zr;2_ DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE I - x eONSTRUCT A NEW DUPLEX RESIDENCE AND PERFORM SITE IMPROVEMENT ON THE LAND LEGALLY DEXCRIBED AS: Lots 19 & 20P 1 W z z 1111 W Ir ic REMARKS 0 z PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D 6 ,:�Ieva&mflhk 15-z 64,ll f1fig VALUATION $ //7 -7 Descrip�tion FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge Building Permit City Surcharge Plumbing Base Fee Mechanical Grading nVI qM "10) Engr. R 4:9L�- - Engr. Inspection Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit Fire Inspection Receipt # Landscapeinsp. Total Amt. -Due Recording Fee Receipt # APPLICATION APPROVA17_ This application is not a permit until signed by the CALL Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. OF ICIAI_5�.�NATUR&/ DATE If (425) 1r)z 771-0220 HEI, F S�o BY TLE4 AVENT ,/ION EXT 11.33 IT 1,44&aAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING Oil STRUCTURE UNTIL Y/1 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 09iO3 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES 111`51� r__11; /_' HEAT SOURCE GAS PLAN CHECK I I GLAZING 17.4 'A LOT SLOPE % 13.2 - 14.0 1 V 4Z THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT 6OVEn-'S WORK TO t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS CL PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS En 10 IN INTERESr. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF _j 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES. AND AGEN rS FROM ANY AND cc 4 ALL. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY cc FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE a DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE _j 01 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CIIYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION: THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND SrATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN DOING TLIE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF T1 BOA CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO Wo� >�qMpe N INSURANCE AND RCW 18 27. SeTUI=REWNER,)� - �Nl y D 7,7o, �r J, Jil I/ DATE , ir RIGINAL-FILE YELLOw.INSPECT9 PINK -OWNER GOLD-ASSESsoR z 0 1 0 171 X M C: M 0 0 -40 0 C M ITI z 01 C: o -n n --I :E M ITI 0 5) 0 17' 0 171 C (1) 9 Cn M 0 Z z --I :E (n z 0 A 0 ITI 'I 7 , i" I, L ic" q CODE, 1997 TIONS, ETC. :NERGY CODE, S t t.._ kTERI AL AND 'CONTRACTOR _F CL ID ALL WORK �71 'T - I 4ALL COMPLY 4-5 COMPONENT 6L :DIMENSIONAL ti 'AND CITY OF q, Ap z 0 Uj i AND SAFETY 0 LABOR AND MINISTRATION JURISDICTION. J) dwwd S OR ST, RECORDS 7 Wiidii (o 0 =n- 2&-s, %T THE SITE. t co AND ACTUAL DNS OR NEED m c DE ADEQUATE m 0 0 C) DIMENSIONAL 4 OZ. D. 0 C ILI 'z �) � V3 F,. m INDEX OF DRA te m z .ONCRETE OR REQUIRE FOR d 11 _f > z E IN SLEEPING A-1 SITE/ROOF P F."i W*/-�%7' FULL SITE SE c/) NORTH TO 5( IRE[ o -n BY FIRE CALCULATICt j GENERAL NO -n IG OF 5.7 SQ. A-2 BASEMENTF 3: IIISHED FLOOR m M �Iiisl, A-3 FIRST FLOOR 0 NOTES - TYP c/) ;ED DISPOSAL P74 T. 0- MECKANICA1 r ENGINEERING 0 m c A-4 SECOND FLO cf) WHOLE KOU� c/) 'ALL RAVE U- k-- ALL GLAZING -LIM I- or.��cm. ATTIC VENT, M C) IISHED FLOOR r Z r- SOLOING ELL RD S4-2, SEC Isms TYPICAL EXT A-6 BUILDING CR( .CES. GUARD r 1 0 1 --1 'AIR LANDING d-,o t E SI�7 - A-7 BUILDING CR( IEAD NOSING; z PROVIDE . .............. E , 01;4_ r, �7_ L AIR FLOW AT INSULATION S-I FOOTING ANC CONCRETE & LL. �SL.715 NOTES & OE' z 0 L "AMERICAN Lige Kew S-2 GROUND FLO .LL UNITS TO !sv-f- 4-'1 Pal- IZO.45 PLAN.SHEAF S-3 FIRST FLOOR m I DEAD BOLT IL 117.1 PLAN. 541EAR LL EXTERIOR t4. pr=p. a. %;30. 0, . ...... ;� - —f- DETAILS _7� V _mw : I its -xie'r S-4 SECOND FLO( ERVATIVE OR m _7p I 17. 1 V SHEARWALL LOCATIONS. EIVED S-4 STRUCTURAt R iE Co 'Ttift R) m 1& 9 A/0- I isr- IG 'JUN 2 8 2004 C-i SITE DRAINA CONTOURS 'D BySekicks ired ReQLd Actual PERMIT COUNTER c.z ORIG;N4L SIT, A/ o 6 1 EN-11 EtiERGY CM INSULATION BUILDING HE Other VVINDOW S& N VOLT#6 IS THE MANHO AT THE -X -AVE. Cffy COPY EN-2 VENTILATIr.? IS DESIGNATED SEWER MANHOLE 29. THE INVERT NEER, FIELD ELEVATION IS 104.96. IT'S RIM ELEVEATION IS 111.72'. OG/05/2007 07:41 4253343473 A BAT AND SERVICE PAGE 02 A -BAT CL A -BAT 9,90DZ Backilow A&wmbly Tosting and Servict P.O. Box 2374 - Suerva, Washington 98203 - (425) 334-6423 1111111111111111111wFax: (425) 334-3473 J1A0j[FL0W pjtgVjMTgR jjVSpRM0N TEST REPORT NEW% EXISTING 0 REPLACEMENT PURVEYOR ID 0 COMM. fo RES. NAME OF PREMISE CITY: ('oqZIP. SERV,ADDRESS -1,d422- PH:&�2r.kK-Z-01 FAXI-io: CONT.PERSON irdgAel- 0.3 IfV OWNER/PAI Xd,'f—e-c- 5-&LZ-7— PH; AC<' e MAII- ADDPISS A. —I CITY e Acz - 7-2-k— CONT. PERSON LOC. OF ASSEMB dra-e-) gdr DOWNSTREAM PROCESS SVBA PRO?. INSTAi SYES [I NO [3 RPBA VqDCVA PVBA I Z. �?, /I ASSEMBLY �/-// , �U- SIZE SERIAL NO. MAMFACTURER MODEL -Z Currently ApproVtd, Not CurrenUy, But Was Appivygd Wben installed 0 Never Approved USC Approysil Psi NO.OFASSZMBLIESTMS LOCATION LINE PRESSURE AT TIME acy"W& mA45yj1A iwtw Chack 3hlya Na. I ck1jk.VdUN&z no �----[3 opsiodal PSID Opeatclat PSID PP&U*d Did Not Opel' ........ ..." ........ #I Cbeek ?SID Few Air Gap OKT improperly Held at PSID Wked.................. I .......... ...... 0 Cleaned Now Peru Cleaned Cleaned - Repalmd, C] Cleaned mad Rcpalry [3 Repalmd [3 Repalmd 0 Repaired Kit 9 PSID Repairo clo"d J*t . . . . . ........... Clow 1*1 � . . . .................... Opeued at PSID Air luiet . Passed 0 ------- p3w pSW #I Cb9ck PSID CheckV&Ive_ ?SID F" 13 1 - 1— — AIR GAP INSPECTIONc R*qWr*d wIntmum ak 98P "POrNtIOn Pr'Ovldtd? [3 YESj@ NO j?/S:T/As0yES2jr40M0NrWRPHs &ZA- ACCT. 0i CONFINED SPACE PROCEDE- 0 YESJI?3,NO CONFINED SPACEs (:3 YES J;NO FIS REMREDt TMEi I IA- C) AM Cj PM DAM METER READING: METER NO.3 -4 REMARKS: E: 6;), CM NO. B-3491 DAT TEUrEDBY, Z11141= PRINT NAM: RON J. MNG U . SC TEST PROCED.- RIYES CL- A-BAT*00990DZ SPC-- INSAYES El NO BOND-]KYES NO &.5 -7"' MODEL& 45.�ejt�Tlk-$ CAI-DATE;Q-.6�_7 MAKE; "y FAX I REPORTTO-, - 6,,,cl� 4 �-/SERV. RESTOREDIM YICS [I NO REpORT RECEIVED BY: -&6-4- w. oyna MNY - CUMMU RECEIVED TIME JUN. 5, U: 4 4 A V1' z 0 i 0 M -i -n M c M 0 C-) 0 C M M Z -Z o n n M M 0 0 0 M C cj) 9 co Q 0 Z > z --i 3: cl) z 0 M Crt� 5, 0 1=111 SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. 'letils 11, T", 41 1 00 ND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS BMW' GEOTECHNICAL A November 2, 2004 City of Edmonds N! 0 Z 121 Fifth Avenue North 0 vA r—s WA 08020 Attn: Ms. Jeanie McConnell RE: GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR IRWIN PROJECT AT 107 SEVENTH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON fo r At your request, we have completed a review of tile temporary shoring system p oposed construction of a two -unit Condominium located at 107 Seventh Avenue North in Edmonds. Documents we have reviewed include: —Temporary Geotechnical Evaluation —Foundation Recommendations -th, Edmonds, Washington, dated Shoring/Proposed Duplex Project, 107 7"' Avenue Noi August 19, 2004, by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. o- Existing and Proposed Grading Plan for Bell Place Condominium, Sheet C-3, dated -win and Associates. 9/26/04 by James R. h o, Revised Shoring Plan (Temporary "Eco-Block" Shoring) dated September 29, 2004, by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. -oposed condominium, showing proposed o- Two sections (A -A' and B-B') through the pt basement elevation. A series of ecology blocks has been proposed as temporary shoring for the excavation at the south end of the proposed development —next to an alley. Three rows of blocks at a 6:1 batter with a back slope above the blocks toward the alley at a ratio of I Horizontal to I Vertical -om 132 to 1_34 feet, (IH: IV) slope has been proposed. Ground elevation at the alley varies fi and the proposed basement floor is 123.9 feet. Excavation depth to the bottom of the footing would range from approximately 10 to 12 feet. According to the geotechnical.report by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E., two test pits were excavated in the alley to a depth of 7 feet. Soils observed in the test pits consisted of very dense, well - graded sands and gravels. Based on our experience, these soils are representative of those known to exist in this area of Edmonds. Groundwater was not observed after tile test holes -S. reportedly remained open for 22 hOL11 400 NORTH 34TH STREET - SUITE 100 21-1-20194-001 P.O� BOX 300303 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 206-632-8020 FAX 206-695-6777 TDID: 1-800-833-6388 0 M K - SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. City or Edmonds Attn: Ms. Jeanie McConnell November 1, 2004 Page 2 Based on our review, the proposed ecology -block shoring system is ail acceptable means of providing excavation Support along the alley at 107 Seventh Avenue North. We recornmend the geotechnical engineer of record observe and document to the City of Edmonds that: C) t) P- Excavation soils are similar to those observed in the test pits. Cut slope to construct the ecology -block shoring is stable and will not impact the adjacent alley and any critical underground utilities. Subgrade soils to support the block wall are suitable for bearing. Construction of the block wall is in accordance with geotechnical encyineer's recommendations. Wall backfill material is acceptable (it appears that on -site sand and gravel would be suitable) and densely compacted. Backfill material placed above the block wall is stable at 1H: IV slope, as shown on the Denis M. Bruce, P.E., detail dated September 29, 2004. A 21/2-inch minus crushed rock would be an alternative unless the on -site soil can be compacted to the IH: IV slope. During wet weather, the upper steep slope should be covered with plastic sheeting to control erosion. The geotechnical. engineer should visit the site and document shoring wall stability and erosion control during and after periods of heavy precipitation, e.g., 1/2inch or more rainfall per day. We recommend the contractor establish a series of points along the alley to record vertical and lateral deformation. Readings should be taken weekly during the excavation and shoring construction, and monthly thereafter. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 695-6801. Sincerely, SHANNON & WILSON, INC. A V Aw. 'C�A %L Thomas M. Gurtowski, P.E. Vice President TMG/trng 21-1-20194-001 -LR Ldodwp/ect loms*wos 21-1-21094-001 z 0 4 0 M Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M. S. C. E., M. B. A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer August 19, 2004 CITY COPY RECEIVED City of Edmonds SEP 17 20011 c/o James R. Irwin and Associates PERMIT COUNTER 2507 NW 202 nd St. Shoreline, WA 98177 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation — Foundation Recommendations — Temporary Shoring / Proposed Duplex Project 1077 th Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington Edmonds Plan Check No. 04 - 264 This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Irwin property at 107 7 1h Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements. REFERENCES: Project Plans for Del Place Condominiums by James Irwin and Associates Site photographs by D. Bruce, P.E. dated August 6, 2004 4 City of Edmonds plan review comments dated August 2, 200 BACKGROUND: The overall property is rectangular in shape with approximately 60 lineal feet th along Bell St., and approximately 110 feet along 7 Ave. N (see property survey). It is understood that the lot previously contained a single-family residence that has since been demolished. It is understood that property owner / developer (James R. Irwin) proposes to build a two -unit condominium project (see project plans). The property is gently sloped (less than 12 percent average grade) and contains no significant geotechnical features. The proposed condominium project will require excavation and a lower level to provide off-street parking. The lower level will require an approximate 1 0-foot soil cut at the rear (southerly) portion of the property adjacent the existing paved alleyway. SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITEDEVELORIVENr - 11vsPEc7-1oN - DRAlIvAGE - DEsIGN&PERMIr - LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, WA 98155 * (206) 546-9217 - FAX (206) 546-8442 z 0 4 0 M —1 -n M C M 0 0 0 C --I K X M M z 10 --1 C cl) 0 _n n M M 0 0 0 M C Cn 9 Cn Q 0 Z X z CD z 0 i 0 M City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 2 Visual evaluation of the property reveals no evidence of any geotechnical distress: no slides, no evidence of settlement, no soil tension cracks, or any evidence of erosional degradation. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, 2 soil test pits were dug on August 5, 2004. The test pits were dug approximately 8 feet north of the alleyway edge of pavement (see photographs). This engineer evaluated the test pits on August 6, 2004. Both test pits revealed similar sub -grade conditions, namely: 0" to 7' Very dense, well -graded sands and gravels NOTE: It is important to note the test holes were opened approximately 22 hours before this engineer evaluated them. Test hole walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. No water was encountered in either of the test holes (particularly noteworthy given the heavy rains of the proceeding evening). CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, the Irwin property at 107 7 th Ave. N is geotechnically approved for the proposed two -unit condominium project, subject to the following: • Temporary shoring: the 1 0-foot cut at the south foundation line will require temporary shoring to prevent erosional sloughing. Additionally, the temporary shoring will provide geotechnical protection for the existing alleyway (see later section on Temporary Shoring — Eco-Blocks). • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 3,000 P.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. • Geotechnical inspections by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. I Z 0 4 0 M --i -n M C M 0 0 0 M M Z X 0 71 M M 0 M Cl) M 0 Z 71 Z -i M 65 1 . Z 0 --q M City of Edmonds c/o James R. irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 3 The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some over -excavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the over -excavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the over -excavation and the footing width. For example, an over -excavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Coefficient of Friction Passive Earth Pressure Where: Design Value 0.55 350 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. z 0 4 0 M —1 -n U5 M 0 0 __10 0 C -4 K M M M z I[) --I C 0 -n n MM 0 0 0 M C CI) K cn M 0 Z z z 0 i 0 M � f City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 4 SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be re -compacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height, which restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure* 35 p.c.f. Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Soil Unit Weight 125 p.c.f. Where: (1) p,.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot defect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need z 0 0 3: 0 M C MO 0 -1 0 0 C -4 K � 4 3: M M Z 0 -n n --i 3: M M 0 0 0 M CD M 0 Z .z Cl) z 0 M City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 5 to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: As stated, the southern foundation line will require excavations of approximately 10 feet below grade. This 1 0-foot cut into the very dense sands and gravels should be protected with temporary shoring. This engineer recommends Eco-Block shoring (see design sketch). In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into n ' ative soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 2H: 1 V. it is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Z 0 i 0 M —i -n 5i --j 0 M C M 0 0 0 __19 M M M Z g) --I C Z o -n n MM 0 0 0 M C C/) 9 co M 0 Z Z —4 M Z 0 i 0 M City of Edmonds C/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 6 Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Z 0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: 0 M Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. i -n These drains should be surrounded by at leas t six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed 5i -i rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar M 0 M C: material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as 0 M 0 -1 the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface 0 0 C water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. -4 F. M M No groundwater was observed in either of the test pits during the fieldwork. M Z C Z Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of V5 drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps 0 -n n interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. - M M The excavation of the site should be graded so that surface water is directed off 0 Vi 0 r- the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any 0 M C CD area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed 9 CO M 0 slopes to b e covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas Z adjacent to buildings should be sl oped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. > GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: Z The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all CD Z surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or 0 i materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. 0 removed M Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent i retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in h orizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 7 soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the z 0 lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents 0 recommended relative compaction for structural fill: M Location of Fill Placement Minimum Relative =i 9 U5 --j Compaction 0 M, C M 0 Beneath footings, slabs or walkways 95% 0 0 C Behind retaining walls 90% M M Z 10 --1 Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12 inches of C Sub -grade, 90% below that level � Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of 0 n the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in M M accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). 0 Use of On -Site Soils 0 M C CD 9 Cn Q 0 Z If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the sandy, on -site soils are very wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains X and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally sandy and X thus are not particularly moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the z moisture content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content. cn Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and z 0 It pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than 4 0 the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill, which is to be placed in wet weather, should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials are segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. .. M City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 8 DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the site at 107 7 th Ave. N. Given the extremely porous nature of the in situ soils, no drainage problems are anticipated. It is understood the new condominium project will comply with City of Edmonds standard drainage practices and tight line into the existing City of Edmonds storm water system. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. TEMPORARY SHORING — ECO-BLOCKS: The 1 O-foot cut near the southern portion of the property will require temporary shoring. This engineer recommends placement of Eco-Blocks in accordance with the attached design sketch and on -site inspections by this engineer. Base Eco-Block should be properly embedded as verified by on -site geotechnical inspections. Blocks should be properly linked and battered at a 1 H:6V slope. INSPECTIONS: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: 0 Soil cuts 0 Temporary Eco-Block shoring 0 Foundation sub -grade verification 0 Retaining wall, or rockery placement. * Any fill placement 0 Subsurface drainage installation 0 Temporary and final erosion control SUMMARY: The proposed Irwin duplex project at 107 7 1h Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington is geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspections during construction. z 0 i 35 M City of Edmonds C/o James R. Irwin and Associates August'19,2004 Page 9 STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK: The plans and specifications for the condominium project at 107 7 th Ave. N by Irwin and Associates (June 28, 2004) have been reviewed by this engineer and conform Z rovided that those conditions to the recommendations of the analysis and report and, p 0 and recommendations are satisfied during the construction and use, and inspected and 3 verified by this engineer, the area disturbed by construction will be stabilized and remain nt, and the risk of damage to stable and will not increase the potential for soil moverne =i 9 the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil CO instability will be minimal. M C M 0 0 0 CLOSURE: Oc M The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance MZ with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other C —Z warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results > of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored M :� cn locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different o -n than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the n ME situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. MM 0 �j 0 r- If there are anV questions, do not hesitate to call. OM 700� rE'XF41RES_ iv23/-zQo <7 Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer DMB:abj cc:c James R. Irwin and Associates BELL PLACE 660 BELL STREET EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 9 Height Calculation Worksheet Date Permit Number oc)3"� Address -7 AA Inspector.. Z� m Average Grade Max Height (25'+Ave.) am Actual Height (A+B+C) 0(0 S(O 10 C ma 0 oil mz� Cz, > M. M 0 M- =(C M 0' Z z z 0 m Ici Elevation of transit above Datum (B) Datum Elevatiort (A) 1/teiiil)/buildiilg/foi-ilis/liciglit workshect CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, II,,JC. TESTING & INSPECTION 12919 14 E 126TH PLACE PREVIOUS REPORT No. No� KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON EVERETT 98034 (425) 823-9800 (425) 259-0817 DAT� CERT. NO. :7 77 L) FIELD REF'lk/--/'IRT PRO, ISO C LOCATION ) �C7 TO: BLDG. PERMIT NO 'OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT AM Si 1 2 AT Pm ATTN: (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED RESTEEL/CONCRETE — RESTEEL ONLY RESTEEUMASONRY — STR.STIWELDING THE — STR.ST/BOLTING (3) ITEMS INSPECTED FOUNDATIONS FOOTINGS SLAB AUGER CAST PILES COLUMNS DRILLED PIERS WALLS BEAMS (5) CONCRETEIMASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED OCT 1 0 ZH6 SPECIMENS CAST it 1.1hia mr SLUMP (INCHES) G AIR CONTENT 0 SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO, YES NO _ ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE-: ITEMS HEREIN TESTED I HIS REPOR'l SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S). NAME(S) PRI14TED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT 114 FULL, WITH. OUT I HE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TES1114G LABORATORY. 114C INSPECTOR SIGNATURE ED REVISED 7105 SIGN 13Y z 0 i 0 m --i -Ti 0 rn c M 0 -40 0 c m m z c c/) 0 -n n m M 0 0 0 m c cl) 9 cn M 0 Z X z z 0 m CAS ADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION PREVIOUS -4948 12 1 2919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT No. No. IlIRKLAND. WASHINGTON 98034 (425) 823-9800 EVERETT (425) 259-0817 DATf CERT. Nk._ FIELD REPORT PROipt- ( "'I Ix. . ( �( IF � q - LOCATION '07 -LL -7 (' A)& /Vl ATTN: (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED RESTEELICONCRETE RESTEEL ONLY RESTEELIMASONRY STR.STfWELDING -.XH E STR.STIBOLTING BLDG. PERMIT NO. 'OWNER WEAT E TEMP. AT AM ( , o , t�,,, A ENGIRaR I LA, 'ONnCTOR c, CD L,�-Z7- (3) ITEMS INSPECTED - FOUNDATIONS FOOTINGS - SLAB AUGER CAST PILES - COLUMNS DRILLED PIERS - W BEAMS (5) CONCRETEIMASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SLUMP (INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT (ly) SEE CYLINDER REPORT N YES — NO — ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS 6&.AM<, REMARKS:-_r�,Oec�r k vd u (SIC, �T�! /' 15 .0 1* L� (A (fo 77T Tz)?-- 441 ICIK ol 150 JeAst i/m xj (c/ 4ctkkk (�d 4-(k i'me' (0) TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED. THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S), NAME(S) PRINTED_ BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL. WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 7105 SIGNED BY COPIES TO: z 0 OM c MID 0 0 x m m z q -n n MITI -cn 0 0 IT! c (1) 1 9 cn M 0 Z z z 0 4 0 m Dennis M. Bruce, RE. M. S. C. M. B. A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer December 30, 2004 City of Edmonds — Development Service Department 121 5 1h Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Field Reports / Geotechnicall Inspections Irwin Duplex Project 107 7 1h Ave. N. Plan Check# 04-264 This engineering report presents the results of geotechnical inspections (to date) for the Irwin Duplex project at 107 7 th Ave. N., Edmonds, WA. These inspections were required by the City of Edmonds in conjunction with the geotechnical report. REFERENCES: 0 City of Edmonds Approved Plans by Irwin Architects * Geotechnical Report and Shoring Designs by D. Bruce, P.E. special Geotechnical Inspection Authorization by City of Edmonds Site Photographs INSPECTIONS: This engineer has provided daily onsite inspections during active excavation and shoring installation phase of the project. Project contractor began excavation during the week of December 20, 2004. As anticipated by the geotechnical report, dense native sands with occasional gravels were encountered. Excavation into this soil was stable. No adverse sloughing or caving occurred. Contractor properly began to install the eco-block shoring, in accordance with the approved designs. Base eco-blocks were well founded in the dense native sub -grade soils. Block linkage, batter, and drainage zone were properly established. SOIL S . FOUNDA 7,10NS _ S1 7,E DE VEL OpMEN _ . INSpEC 7*10N . DRA INA GE - DESIGN & PERA41 7- - L EGA L P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, WA 98155 * (206) 546-9217 - FAX (206) 546-8442 Z 0 q 0 M --i -n Cn 0 M C M 0 C-) 0 C --I K M M M Z C _Z C/) o -n n M M 0 0 0 M C Cn 9 Cn M 0 Z Z —i M Cn Z 0 M M! City of Edmonds — Development Service Department December 30, 2004 Page 2 of 2 This engineer verified that all temporary shoring (eco-block walls) were properly constructed and are c igotechnically stable. No adverse erosion control problems were observed during inspections. The native sands allow for excellent drainage and infiltration of storm water. z 0 The rear alleyway has been well maintained and is geotechnically stable. M SUMMARY: :n 0 Excavation and temporary shoring work have been properly completed M 0 M and are approved through this date (December 30, 2004). C 0 M 0 --1 0 0 C: 0 All Eco-Block shoring is stable and geotechnically approved. C M M z 0 Geotechnical inspections are ongoing in accordance with City of Edmonds 0-1 C: —z permit requirements. CD If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. t 6�- 30 Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer 111X C.C. Irwin and Associates 2507 NW 202ndSt. Shoreline, WA 98177 DMB:jpb 0 -n n --I M9 M M 0 0 0 M C: cn 9 0) M 0 Z z Cn z 0 1 0 M GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR -0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771 Website: www.dedmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning Building Engineering March 15, 2007 0 James R. h-win nd 2507 NW 202 Street =n Shoreline, WA 98177 M C M h 0 SUBJECT: Driveway Approach — 107 7 Ave N, Permit #2004-0939 O� 0 M Jim, M Z C z Your request for modification to the City standard driveway approach, received March > 12, 2007, has been reviewed by City staff. 0 -n 1h Due to the steep grade of 7 Ave N and the need to maintain a driveway slope that meets the requirements of the Edmonds Community Development Code, it is found reasonable M M dard design for the driveway approach at this location. to allow a modification to the Stan 0— Cn 0 0 M The driveway approach shall be constructed per the attached standard detail, which is C co 9 CD consistent with ADA requirements. A form inspection is required prior to concrete pour. M 0 Z Please call the Engineering inspection line at 425-771-0220, ext. 1326 to schedule your 711 inspection. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at 425-771-0220, ext. 1338. co Sincerely, z 0 0 M Engineering Technician c: street file,"MW.' � 9' perrr'ml"Wh AM-, W J W2 Q04F P Incorporated August 11, 1890 c;i, tpr (.ifii - HoWnnn Jnnnn allOWS Tiatf uninterrupted sidewalk planting strip sidewalk stop -Street Elevation change is made within the planter strip, allowing level (2%) sidewalk at driveway Irwin 9-unj� Omdo 007sinwe'd per irar-m in!;,eeck�97j reezu�rd lvy)* 14 pwoe, JAMES R. IRWIN & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECT 2507 N.W. 202ND STREET SHORELINE, WA .98177 206-683-4592 (CEL) '2907 206-542-9191 (HOME OFFICE) MARCH 10, 2007 m MR. DAVID GEBERT, P.E. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS m m 121 5TH AVE. N. 0 0 EDMONDS, WA 98020 c m m z RE: DRIVEWAY APPROACH MODIFICATION z BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM > c 107 7TH AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 cl) BUILDING PERMIT NO. 2004-00939 0 -n -n 3:9 mm* DEAR MR. GEBERT: .0 co I AM WRITING TO REQUEST A SLIGHT MODIFICATION TO THE CITY OF 0 m c cn 9 CD EDMONDS DRIVEWAY TRANSITIONAL STANDARD AS IT WILL APPLY TO THE M 0 ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT. WHEREAS THE CITY STANDARD REQUIRES THAT BOTH THE CITY AND PRIVATE SIDES OF THE DRIVEWAY CURB TRANSITION ARE TO SLOPE AT 1:12, WE WOULD LIKE TO SLOPE ONLY THE CITY > z SIDE OF THE TRANSITION. TO SLOPE BOTH, WOULD CREATE A NON- CONFORMING DRIVEWAY SLOPE ON THE LOWER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY WHICH cn IS DICTATED BY THE SLOPE OF 7TH AVE. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED IN AN ON- z 0 SITE REVIEW BY JEANIE MC CONNELL, THAT IF ALLOWED THIS MODIFICATION, 0 WE WILL STILL MAINTAIN THE 1:12 HANDICAP MAXIMUM SLOPE REQUIREMENT THE CITY STANDARD ACHIEVES. THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING THIS REQUEST. JAMES R. IRWIN PROJECT ARCHITECT C: MS. JEANIE MC CONNELL RECEIVED REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY FORNI U N - 4 2007 BUILDING DEPT. Project Name_ Project Address BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM 107 7th AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 Person Requesting Temporary Occupancy JAMES R. IRWIN (Note only ilic property o%mer or building owner may request tempormy occupancy) (Print Name) Today's Date JUNE 2,2007 DatcTemporary Occupancy Needed JUNE 7, 2007 Check the box indicating that the rioted iterns ai*e complete on site. All fit-e and life -safely requit-ements for Building, Fii-e and Engineei-ing shall be complete in oi-der for Tenil)orai-y Occupancy to be considered. List anyspecific itern that is missing and indicate the date ivhen it ivill be Provided. I . All building windows, exterior siding, roof, and exterior doors arc installed/complete. Missing: 2. f- :k All required fire rated construction (floor/ceiling, walls & unit separations, etc.) and structural members (columns, beams, etc.) are complete. Missing: � 3. Fk All required fire protections systems are complete and in full operation, including fire sprinkler, fire alan-n, standpipes, fire and smoke detection, fire Suppression, etc.). Annunciation and/or notification equipment is installed and is operational. Missing: 4. N All required components of the means of egress system shall be complete and operable, including but not limited to exit enclosurcs/corridors, fire rated doors and windows, door hardware, illuminated exit signage, and emergency lighting, stair handrails, guardrails, etc. Missing: 5, X Accessible signage, accessible parking, ramps, and directional signage is installed. Missing: 6. W Ali interior finish materials on floors and walls are complete. Missing: CARPET IS NOT INSTALLED 7. F I The number parking spaces on -site striped arc including parking space(s). Missing: z 0 A 0 M -n X M M 0 0 C M M z C —Z X Cn 0 -n n .-I X M M 0 0 0 M C (n 9 co M 0 Z X X z z 0. --i M Circle the following utilities that are complete (storm, water, scl�vcr, electrical, heat, light, phone, cable, and garbage/recycling). Missing: FIENCE, AROUND GARBAmFJ]RiFryCT.TNG AIRIEA 9. x Required cross connection protection of tile potable water system installed for premise isolation and all required interior fixtures. Missing: 10. x Specify the unit numbers, tenant spaces or floors requesting occupancy. 'V+r-c_t;_r2100r_ Unit loor ?Drl Vlnnir Tjnil� 700 z 0 For multifamily or mixed use buildings, submit a written statement of how 0 continued construction and Occupant co-existcnce will. be achieved. M 12. Attach a site plan showing tile following: i 9 How Fire Department access will be maintained. co M C Location of construction worker parking (on street parking shall be regulated m 0 by Parking Enforcement and will be subject to applicable fines). 0 0 0 Construction material storage. C How safe tenant access will be maintained to tile spaccs/areas where M M Z temporary occupancy is being requested. 10 C Z How required parking will be kept clear ofconstruction worker pal -king and > material storage. V5 * How garbage access will be maintained clear and accessible. 0 -n * A work schedule detailing completion of tile remainder of tile project and n estimated date for request for Certificate of Occupancy for the entire building. rn M 13. X The State Electrical Inspector has approved service. 0- 0) 0 r- Missing: nijiF Tn W.9PRCT JUNE 6TH 0 M C CD 9 Cn 14. Elevator service has been approved by the State Inspector. Q 0 Z Missing: X 15. Snohomish County Health District approval has been granted. Missing: z 16. M Plumbing systems are complete, CD Missinw. POWDIR ROOM VESSEL FAUCET UNIT �200 NOT INSTALLED z 0 17. Mechanical and HVAC systems are complete. M Missing: Address numbers posted, occupant load signs posted, accessible signage is posted. Missing: 19. [1 For buildings containing more than two units, submit the Building Enclosure letter required by I-IB 1848. 20. 11 Attach a work schedule detailing the remaining work on the project and include a final completion date. BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM JUNE 2,,2007 107 7TH AVE. N. RECEIVED EDMONDS, WA 98020 JUN - 4 2007 CONTINUED CONSTRUCTION BUILDING DEPT. AND Z OCCUPANT CO -EXISTENCE M The remaining items to be finished fall into the categories of pick-up and detail. It will be primarily clean-up and refinement of M C hardware, painting, and final deck coating. M 0 0 C Electrical sign -off: Light fixtures are due to arrive the following week. 3: M We have installed temporary fixtures to satisfy the Department of M Z Labor and Industries Electrical Inspection. C Building Access: The access into and out of the garage area will 0 _n remain unaffected during this period. No construction activities are planned to take place in the shared garage area. X M M Garbage/recycling area: The garbage area concrete pad is 050 0 0 M C Cn complete. It will be accessible to both residences without 9 Cn Q 0 interruption. The screen fencing around that area will be finished Z during the period of temporary permitted occupancy. 3: Work schedule: Work will continue consistently until all items are > Z finalized. Work will occur only during normal work hours. cn Z 0 James R. Irwin M Owner/project Mgr. BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM JUNE 212007 107 7TH AVE. N. EDMONDS, WA 98020 CONTINUED CONSTRUCTION RECEIVE D AND 4 Z007 OCCUPANT CO -EXISTENCE BUILDING DEFT- Z� The remaining items to be finished fall into the categories of pick-up and detail. It will be primarily clean-up and refinement of hardware, painting, and final deck coating. 0 XM C Electrical sign -off: Light fixtures are due to arrive the following week. MO 0 0 0 We have installed temporary fixtures to satisfy the Department of C Labor and Industries Electrical Inspection. M M M Z Building Access: The access into and out of the garage area will > _Z r remain unaffected during this period. No construction activities are Cn planned to take place in the shared garage area. 0 -n 71 Garbage/recycling area: The garbage area concrete pad is M M complete. It will be accessible to both residences without 0 0 M interruption. The screen fencing around that area will be finished C C0 9 Cf) I., during the period of temporary per mitted occupancy. Q0 Z Work schedule: Work will continue consistently until all items are finalized. Work will occur only during normal work hours. Z James R. Irwin Z Owner/project Mgr. 0 M E-1 z E- P4 CONSTRU�TION PARKING TO OCCUR' IN PUBLIC STREET SPACES ON 7th D.W. AVEENUEli DRIVEWAY WILL REMAIN CLEAR FOR FIRETRUCK ACCESS 4 0 DEM BUILDING 0 z 0 0 ci F-j mm m z -4 04 c -Z > P4 E-1 I U) 14 0 -n m M 0 0 c cl) rl c/) mo� Z 0 NG NORTH BELL STREET CENTER LINE 60' ROW JAMES R. IRWIN & ASSOCIATES BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM 107 7TH AVENUE NORTH ARCHITECT EDMONDSF WA 98020 206-683-4592 T- NZ z E-� z 4 ol E- PL4 14 CONSTRUCTION PARKING TO OCCURI-1 IN PUBLTC STREET SPACES �N 7th D.W. AVEENUE DRIVEWAY WILL REMAIN CLEAR FOR FIRETRUCK ACCESS 3UN - 4 Nul I' : � :; 9 f3UILDING DEP`�' U5 -j I X: c m 0 a 0 C m m z c -Z o -n 0 M P4 m 0 0 0 m c cl) Co. mo Z z z 0, SID-EW-ALK NORTH BELL STREET CENTER LINE 60' ROW BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM JAMES R. IRWIN ASSOCIATES 107 7TH AVENUE NORTH ARCHITECT EDMONDSr WA 98020 H E-4 z E- P4 rE CONSTRUCTION t 'PARKINGITO OCCUR IN PUBLIC STREET SPACES 9N 7th D.W. AVEENUEJ DRIVEWA)t WILL REMAIN CLEAR FOR FIRETRU�K ACCESS z 0 1 RECEIVED JUN - 4 2007 BUILDING DEPT. 0 -40 z mm El m z P4 E-4 0 m A 0 m C (j) c/) mol Z .---S-IDEWlKLAT 0 BELL STREET NORTH JAMES R. IRWIN & ASSOCIATES BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM ARCHITECT 107 7TH AVENUE NORTH 206-683-4592 EDMONDS, WA 98020 a ease a.... -------- ------------------------------- - - ------------------------ - - -- ------------------- - ------- --------------------------------------------------- RECORD OF INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED SETBACKS ..................... C)- FOUNDATION: Footing ...................... Wall.......................... Pier/Porch ................. Retaining Wall ........... Slab Insulation .......... PLUMBING: Underground ............. yn Rough -in ................... Commercial Final ...... HEATING: Gas Test .................... Gas Piping ................. Equipment ................. Commercial Final ....... EXTERIOR SHEATHING C).- NAILING .......................... cn, k.,CR FRAMING ........................ 3-L v FIRST FLOOR FRAMING... INSULATION ................... Floor Insulation ......... Wall Insulation ........... Ceiling Insulation ....... SHEETROCK NAILING ... SPECIAL INSPECTION ... MISCELLANEOUS .......... FINAL APPROVAL FOR OCCUPANCY .................. Amout P,-"- AE2. Datelssm-d- NY.-4 .Ler Alet A m, o a n r)- epurc"�P:! at Vv z 0 i 0 M --i -n 0 M C M 0 0 __40 0 M M z J) 0 -n n M M 0 0 0 M C cf) i F. C/) Q 0 Z X > z z 0 i 0 M