20040945.pdfDATE RECEIVED
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
IVI,,00A, 4 LZJ
lW(J
A t a) V/ (_ b 14
MAILING ADDRESS
z
6_6C 1\4 A 1 0 D T_
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
V\/4 ca'('111d
NAME
F-
U
I— ADDRESS
CITY ZIP ITELEPHONE
N AME
0UAU__-.ff7
ADDRESS
01 7 0 C
b F1
CITY ZIP
0 r—
ISTATE LICENSE NUMBER
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
ZI -7,11 -) - (*)CA -1 - (-V)CA -
CBL #
5/ LL// I I PERMIT EXPIRES LLA4Z4J-4�
USE PERMIT
ZONE NUMBER
JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO, LID NO.
7 1 LID FEE S
PUBLIC FIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
EXISTING — PROPOSED
REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT
METER SIZE I LINE SIZE I NO. OF.FIX
1!3
I ESCP Approved
13
HW Poinill Flowiltod
13
SIfflol use permit Hoq'd
13
Inspection noitijurid
E3
Sidewalk Required
E3
Undtitground
Wiring rocimrod
C3
PRV REQUIRED
YES 13 NO K
REMARKS I
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLIDRAINAGE
ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY
DATE
FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE
TELEPHONE Z-1f
x'U'%tr-PP�tIlp e��Iie ?5,yj�,7VF, )1VS6e-_tf1a
EXPIRATION DATE
n NEW
El RESIDENTIAL
ADDITION
COMMERCIAL
ErREMODEL
MULTIFAMILY
REPAIR
GRADING CYDS
DEMOLISH
TANK
GARAGE
RETAINING WALL
CARPORT
ROCKERY
(TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
0 f 7 [--1
c C-
NUMBER
OF
STORIES
NUMBER OF
DWELLING
UNITS N) /A
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
I IEEFLALa
I �j -, U-_v
KfA-414
HEAT SOURCE
CHECKED BY
N'(P L ULM B �IN
_> / MECH
COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF USE
SIGN
FENCE
( X Fr)
OYER
LjILDIPG p
FIRE SPRINKLER
FIRE ALARM
125
z
R
W
z
z
a
z
ILI
VARIANCE OR CU
SHORELINE
0
ADB#
INSPECTION
BOND
I
RE)),
POSTED
OYE :S
ko
S
SEPA REVIEW
SIGN fl�IEA
HEIGHT
COMPLETE EXK
ALLOWED
PROPOSED
ALLOWED PROPOSED
EXP
LOT COVERAGE
REQUIRED
SETBACKS(FT)
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT)
ALLOWED PROPOSED
FRONT
SIDE REAR
FRONT LJR SIDE REAR
-------------------- z
z
z
PARKING
LOT AREA
PONING
RE
Y ATE
REO'D I PROVIDED
jV!5�ED
IL
CHECKED BY OF C��ORUCTION CODE OCCUPANT
I A vileP-1
ITYPE
GROUP '13
CRITICAL V %JL,�-
AREAS
I V___
SPECIAL INSPECTION OCCUPANT
NUMBER
JAREA
REQUIRED E LOAD
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D
z
a
T7A I Ks W) M
Mj
5
6:-�jooL-.L_ To _R` 9- L 0C A' T La
t WORK 1C01UFL--V4L)jGLf
GLAZING %
LOT SLOPE %
PLAN CHECK NO:W,,. I �,q 17
VESTED DATE
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
ui PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT.''I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
in
W IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
_j
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
cc
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OFWHATEVER NAI`URE. ARISING DIRECVLYOR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF nits PERMIT ISSUANCE OF I HIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
_j DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
0 Noll LIMIT IN ANY WAY I HE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.'
x
FEE
Description
State Surcharge
City Surcharge
Base Fee
Plan Chk. Deposit
FEE
Receipt U
7
Total Amt. Due
Receipt #
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS RRECT� AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL [his application is not a permil until signed by the
, 1�14 TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18,27. 1 OFFIC I --_qIrNA-r�IRF IIATE i
SIG TURE OWNER OR AGEN-O/ DATE SIGNED (425)
A
774, 771-0220 REtEAS
FFENTION E)ff 1333
is u U
IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
09,03 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES
VALUATION
$ r—,
/� 2,t/
Description
Plan Check
Building Permit
Plumbing
Mechanical
Grading
Engr. Review
Engr. Inspection
Fire Review
Fire Inspection
Landscapelnsp.
Recording Fee
'U
13Y
ORIGIN� JFI YELLCAN - INSPECTOR
PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR
z
0
1
0
M
-4 =fi
CD
3:
0 rn
C
M
0
0
0 C
—4 K
3: r1i
M z
0 --1
C:
3:
Cn
0 -n
n
M M
0 _Cn
0 r_
0 M
C W
9 Cn
M 0
Z
z
—I
3:
W
z
0
1
0
ITI
I
J
Nsw
DC—we—
vj
10
I
rAAw.R—cq?�kps,
KA ejo S
P t-A%'t is I " -SI-1
. I -T 0
. I i KIP �-) 6 t�
—>�v
tz W t,�
Q 4 4 L,
Q W
Zone Comer Flag_�L
Setbacks Required Actual
Front
0
Sides
CITY Rear 0
Other A 11A
Height
PPROV D BY PLANNING
JtIL 2 3
PIR141T CotjlVj_�7,
M Id � ,IeGa
C')0K0n,r
630 main street Edmonds, washington 98020
July 22, 2004
Ms. Ann Bullis
City of Edmonds
1215 1h Ave N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: 630 Main St
Building Permit
Dear Ms. Bullis:
We are filing a permit application for approval for two projects at our office. One is an
interior remodel, basically moving a bathroom, and the other is to replace an existing
deck with a new and larger one. It is my understanding that you interpret the
requirements for ADA compliance. There are two issues which our plan raises that I am
asking you to consider.
1. For the interior bathroom move, we ' are being asked to replace an existing
exterior 32" door with a 36" door. The interior remodel does not in anyway
involve new, or a change to exiting, access to the office. In 1996, we
purchased this property and converted it to commercial use. At that time, we
met all of the 4 ADA stipulations, one of which was to build a handicapped
ramp to the exterior 32" door. In the eight years we have been in this office,
we have only had one person in a wheelchair come in, and he was able to
make it through the 32" door. Because of the multiple additions to this home
over its 100+. years, and the rather peculiar height of the door, that door has to
be replaced with a custom door. The estimate for the door and its installation
is close to $1,000. Will you allow us to retain the current door?
2. The second item is again a handicapped access issue, this time to the rear
deck. The plans give you a basic understanding of the situation. Please allow
me to elaborate. There is approximately a 42" height difference between the
deck, which is being built on grade, and the existing handicapped ramp from
which the stair to the deck will come. The purpose of the deck is two fold.
First, we want to make the back yard more pleasant and secondly we want to
do it in a fashion that doesn't require weekly maintenance, like a lawn would.
In addition, the stairs that provide access to the rear yard are beginning to
decay, so for safety purposes they need to be replaced.
(425) 774-3200 IVWW.ttictiotiaf(ttricgarry.cotti
(800) 466-4700 Iax (425) 774-3222
z
0
A
0
M
-n
0 M
C
M 0
0
--to
0 C:
M
M Z
K) --I
C
o -n
n
--I
:C
M M
0
0
0 M
C Cn
9 (n
M 0
Z
z
U)
z
0
1
F5
M
'1�
In speaking to the counter staff, we have been told that according to a strict
interpretation of the ADA codes, we would have to provide new handicapped
access to the deck. In order to do so, we would have to remove an existing
laurel, cherry, lilac and other smaller plants. The ramp could run parallel to
Durbin Dr. and would basically cover the entire existing garden area. There is
however barrier free access to the rear yard. This would involve leaving the
office across the ramp and heading down the sidewalk to the alley, and then
along the alley for about 20' (the length of the garage) and then across the
parking area, (the width of the garage) to the deck.
I support the intent of the ADA, but in this case, the construction of the ramp
would not be in anyone's best interest. First of all, it would require the
removal of existing mature landscaping. Second, it would eliminate all
privacy for the back yard. The yard runs parallel to the library parking lot.
Third, the cost of the ramp is estimated at about $2,500, this is almost 60% of
the entire deck project. And finally, the ramp would be of little benefit. I
cannot perceive of case in which a wheel chair bound person needing access
to that deck. If the situation did arise, the existing access is available and if
needed, one of the other employees could provide assistance.
As you can imagine, we are novices at the permitting process. Our goal is to fully
comply with all of the applicable building codes. But I believe that the ADA does give
some latitude for interpretation and appropriateness of the prescribed remedy.
So you can get a fuller understating of the project, I've enclosed a CD with several
photos. I hope that these will help you to see the existing plantings and backyard.
Furthermore, I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you in person, or take
you for a "tour", don't worry this lot is small and it won't take long!
Ms. Bullis, thank you for your time. I look forward to hearing your decision.
Sincerely,
McDONALD McGARRY
4 J i A.
McDonald
-Tail: Jolm (g.iiiccloiialdnic�,�ai-i-y.coili
JAM/hs
z
0
1
0
M
=i -fi
M
M
0
0
0 C:
--4 K
3: M
M Z
-Z
Cn
0 -n
M
M M
0
0
0 M
C Cl)
9 0)
Q 0
Z
;U
z
--I
3:
5
z
0
1
0
M
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
Websile: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building Engineering
C.
April 7, 2005
John A. & Sandra W. McDonald
630 Main St
0
Edmonds, WA 98020
0
=n
Re: Building Permit: 2004-0945
Site Address: 630 Main St.
M
C
M
Expiration Date: 11/12/05
0
0
0
Dear John A. & Sandra W. McDonald,
MM'
According to B uilding Division recor ds tile subject project has recently received the shectrock
M
nailing inspection approval. The remaining inspec tions required are noted on, tile field job card
>
F- --j
tions,b Fire, Engineering, Planning and lastly Building.
and include final inspec y
W
0 -n
-n
If you' are certain the,building will be complete before tl e permit expires be sure that, the
following is complete before contacting tile Building Inspector for the final occupancy
MM
inspection: 1) All requiredspecial inspection repo rts are submitted to tile City and 2) All other
0 U5
0
City Departments have granted Final project approval.
0 M
Cn
If You have any questions please feel free to call our office at 425-771-0220.
9 Cn
Q 0
z
Sincerely,
>
3:
Jo
npe ZUl If
1. t Spe. alij
st
Per t Spe list
0
0
ixrem1)\i)s,rs\Niaster Letters\Srwarn[ArCom 10/27/00
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Citv - Hekinan. Jai)an
FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM
TO:
DATE:
MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION
FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE
PWASE SIGN
ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE
PLEASC SIGN
-7
PLANNING DIVISION DATE
X E M
PROJECT t
SITE ADDRESS— 630 M1,X% si�
PERMIT #-ZOO
4 0") �4-5 ADB# DATEINSPECTED
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED
A field inspection was conducted to determine compliance wAh -approved plans. Final approval
denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of
PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of
V'--- G NIT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
0 Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector
FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES
0 Copy of CORRE CTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inpector
2.
3.
RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date SignatLire
1:ten1j):b1dg:fbrn1s:ocaprv1 3/25/04
z
0
1
0
M
--i -n
M
C
M
0
0 C
4 K
= M
M Z
0 -H
C:
0 -n
n ;d
__j >
:c 9
M M
0
0
0 M
Q 0
Z
7-1
;U
z
--i
X
U)
z
0
M
FINAL PROJECY APPROVAL FORM
TO:
DATE:
MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUIOLDING DIVISION
FROM: zg_ FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE C,
ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE
PLEASE SIGN
PLANNING DIVISION DATE
PLEASE SIGN
PROJECT At c-'() ILJ-
SITE ADDRESS 2A/
PERM1T#0,_dc)c[— ADB#---------PATF, INSPECTED
k - -
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED
A field inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval
denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of
PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of:
GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
u Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector
1 .
FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES
u Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector
1 .
2.
3.
RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date Si
ocaprv1.doc.1:temp:b1dg:f6rnis 10/0 1
7
z
0
i
0
M
=i =fi
0 M
C
M 0
0
C-)
0 C:
M
M Z
0 --1
c::
:t
0 -n
n X
>
M M
0 U5
0 r-
0 M
U)
Cn
Q 0
Z r-
71 M
r
z
Cn
z
0
i
0
M
,1
RECORD OF iNSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED
I
SETBACKS .....................
FOUNDATION:
Footing ......................
Wall..........................
Q7
Pier/Porch .................
Retaining Wall ...........
Slab Insulation ..........
PLUMBING:
Underground .............
Rough -In ...................
Commercial Final ......
HEATING:
GasTest ....................
Gas Piping .................
Equipment .................
Commercial Final .......
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
NAILING..........................
FRAMING........................
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING...
INSULATION ...................
Floor Insulation .........
Wall Insulation ...........
Ceiling Insulation .......
SHEETROCK NAILING ...
SPECIAL INSPECTION ...
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY ..................
Poo*
Tile 11litials NIT are Miltoll
ary Contract
T110111PSO11, a tellipor,
ilispcctor ror tile city.
z
0
i
0
M
--i -n
c')
M
C
M
0
0
0 C
M
M Z
C
0 -n
n
ITIM
055
0 r-
0 M
C (/)
9 Cn
IT! 0
Z
z
0)
z
0
M