20050179.pdfFATE RECEIVED,
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
%3 to K Y= V r o Z� I [[c, r ee;t
MAILINGADDRESS
. 0 -V
-F' , 70Y
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
.0
F,v-e Vtt_ VJA*r 15 L I L-1 , 7 tqri ZT1
NAM E
ADDRESS
1-hool
CITY ZIP
wtoc) 1*1 Vk ir I
NAME
I ( 0 ".0 )N %e V.\
AD RESS
CBL#
PERMIT EXPIRES
PERMIT
NUMBER
JOB
ADDRESS
SUITE/APT#
PLAT NAMEISUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
WeAffi.i2it.. Vil eo
4-
LID FEE S
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCPApproved
RW Pam, Raqueed
[3
13
EXISTING PROPOSED
Seoul Use Permil Required
Inspection Required
13
0
Sidewalk Required
0
REQUIRED DEDICATION FT
died regutr 0
[3
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YES 13 NO CI
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLjDRAINAGE
uj
uj
z
z
NGINEEI�T�G REVIE ED BY DATE
FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE
CITY
ZIP
TELEPHONE
VARIANCE OR CU
SHORELINE OR ADBN
INSPECTION
REO'D
13YES NO
SEPA
CO
I MPLETED I EXEM T
T E LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATIO DATV
9jLLC,fmC27t2j0_4--, �7alrg
CHECKED BY
CA
W
STUDY 13
ZONE
SIGN AREA
ALLOWED PROPOSED
HEIGHT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
zq 6.,
0
0
z
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
or) to&19-5- nouo 4-oo
EfNEW RESIDENTIAL
P6PLUMBING I MECH
COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR
ADDITION MIXED I USE El CHANGE OF USE
REMODEL SIGN
MULTIFAMILY
FENCE
REPAIR CYDS X FT.)
LOTCOVERAGE
ALLOWED PROPOSED
REQUIRED SETBA�
FRONT SIDE
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
FROIN R
PARKING
REO'D I PROVIDED
�2_
LOTAREA
PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
REMARKS
DEMOLISH
TANK
OTHER
�GARAGE
CCARPORT
RETAINING WALL
El ROCKERY
FIRE SPRINKLER�
FIREALARM
(TYPE OF USE, BUSIl`_49SS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
NUMBER
OF 15STORIES
DESCRIBE WORK TO
q
NUMBER OF
DWELLING
UNITS
T
,je
�Kl
TYPE V MNSTRUCTION
rCCUPANT
GROUP,
SPECliL 1�+ECTION
REQUIRED YES
7V,
CONSULTANT
OCCUPANT
LOAD
REMARKS
k
GE�IOTE H. 0
BY:
pe-
ill OZ,
STRUCIUAL
BY:
DESlr4N
mur4 ljle�?
VALUATION
I
lq�q�44 I s ��eTl .4
_.2
5 - tt7
41
Description
FEE
Description
FEE
1 Plan Check
co
State Surcharge
=Cr
LOT SLOPE%
ESTED DATE
Building Permit
City Surcharge
PLAN CHECK NO:
Plumbing
Base Fee
4�24_
Mechanical
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
Grading
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBIC
DONMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
_j
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review
PERMIT APPLICATION: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(5)
uj
PERMIT LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00,005(A)(6)
Engr. Inspection
674/�20
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
U)
U)
'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SU CCESSORS
Fire Review
Plan Chk. Deposit
--A
A&V
W
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
2
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
Fire Inspection
Receipt #
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
Landscapelnsp.
Total Amt. Due
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFY. WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION. -
lReceipt#
Recording Fee
APPLICATION APPROVAL
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC.
CALL
This application is not a pernit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or his/her Deputy. and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION
receipt is acknowledged in space provided
I LS SIGNATt� ATE
I
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27.
(425)
SIGN TUR (OW E R AGENT):
DATE SItNED
L771-0220
bA-1
EXT. 1333
BY
1 IM A IrA.-421 .2
ATTENTION
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI-
FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109 / IBC110 / IRC110.
10104 PRESS HARD - YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES
YELLOW', INSPECTC
GOLD -ASSESSOR
U
Q
te
z
0
i
0
M
-n
M
C
M 0
0
0
0 C
X M
i M Z
C
>
0 -n
-n
3:9
MM
0 C-1)
0 r-
0 M
C
9 0)
Q 0
Z
z
X
W
z
0
M
FRE h1l) AM ADDRESS Mi MQU M- n,
E FOP RIGHT-07
-WAY GONE, "rpirTICr) FC.9W
AN!) Dp
AN
pLner, Flag X.w
.1c NEW om
etbacks Required Actual lufory
GRA )ING QUANTITIES- Front
CUT: 350 cu yards Sides
FILL: 12 cu yards P P f i 0 Vii S.:.N QT E Q
Rear
Other xg�&" 70th PlacqjWe qGI, -RING
DOWNSPOUTS I Height _25 )1�
AND AREA DRAIN TO 30" 0
x 18'DETENTI.ON PIPE, 1.9 421
CONTROL MANHOLE LID at AFFuR VE BY NING 0$4; .01 099
262.0 OUTLET INVERT at \4 f 0c.
1258.3', 3/4" ORIFICE, TO 2,30 .'
CITY OF EDMONDS 2
STANDARDS
T.E.S.C. 28'0 ... .....
. FILT 1 80.5 (280)
ER FABRIC FENCE--,\\ 282.
- BAG EXPOSED..CB's (275)— zo.
-SEED DISTURBED EA =1 w
ASAP ci (w4s a
ROCK CONST. w 27 11)
__7 2
ENTRANCE AS REQ'D cf)
FOOTING DRMAINNS
RI
TO BE TIED INT J2710
298.3
DUENTION SY E
w
IN
cn
>
r-n
M
4v 7Z�2_70.5 00 0)11 -4 Si
6 5 -4
co ACK Tdb .1
(j) 5' ETB rea Dr i D 8,Lij o
Rim: 267,
261.5 t' CB2 Lp Invert: 265.5 =3 W-9
M M
:261.46 �A! exisV CB1
30'ASPHA
280.5 LT—
rt: 254.4
282.5 -DRIVEWAY- b Rim: ?70.36
270
Invert: 259.7
+270.5 6" CO WATER
LOCKING �j "'DATUM**
1095 METER
/4
PHOLE' C ER
vg elev = 273.75
+25 exi B WATER SERVICE LINE
lht limit 298.75 1 .1 (5'MIN. FROM SIDE 72nd Avenue We
SEWER)
TRI.XTION
"COF RL
. . .........
'AL_
north 1" 20' 2/10/05 tX-POSE-0 SURFACES TO
BE GOV�RtO WITHIN 2 DAYS
R urn ess
e)
ON V C- A N My
.40o'� Nt ,-,,q , P I-
F
200501310663 2 PGS
01 -311-2005 12:29PM $20.00
SNOHOMISH COUNTY—WASHINGTON
Z'
M�
Docu7�nt Titlels)
-n
o
.0 M:
M 0,
aoc�
Reference Number(s) of Related Document(s)
M:
MZ1
Additional, Reference Vs on Page
Graritor(s)
Ca
'K V-
0 -n
-n
Additional Grantors on Page
MM
Grantee(s)
0 r
PL'L
0 M
C (J)
C CO).
Additional Grantees on Page
M
z 0
Legal Description (abbreviated form: ie Lo.t/Block/Plat or Se.6tion[Towns.hip/Range)
Cornp�lel:6 Legal on Page
A ssessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number
4
X
r
60 /0 qs: Iffiva lovv
Additional Parcel #'s on Page
0
0
The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the. information Orovided on this form. The responsibility for the
accuracy of the indexing information is that of the document prepbrer.
r
C
STATEMENT ON ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
01h
Property Address: 16214 7 Place West
Edmonds, Washington
Legal Description: Lot 4 of Westmont View Division No. 2 according to Plat recorded
in Volume 36 of Plats at Pages 24&25, in Snohomish County, Washington
z
Assessor's Parcel Number: 00 6495 0000 0400
0
M
I have read the requirements for accessory dwelling units contained in Chapter 20.21 of
the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) and understand that an accessory
dwelling unit as defined in ECDC Section 21.05.015 is prohibited until an Accessory.
M
Dwelling Unit Permit is approved. .,c
M
0
0
C
I also understand that an Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit cannot be approved unless all
the criteria in Chapter 20.21 are met, and all the necessary items are submitted, X M,
MZ;
including an affidavit of occupancy and a covenant to be filed with the Snohomish
County regarding the regulations imposed on Accessory Dwelling Units. z
Property Owner Signatur 0 _n
Property Owner Name (printed): (Hillcrest Const.-Co.,Jnc.)Jon Kvernmo, its President
M M
Date:
CO)
.0
0
M
C
K co
STATE OF WASHINGTON M 0.
PUBLIC �zr
7-1
8
8-13-200
tP3,
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) ;U
at J 0,1 r�.i z
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence th
igned this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her free and voluntary act for the uses and
s 3:
purposes mentioned in this instrument. Vi
z
0
Notary's pressure seals must be smudged. Dated: a -7/0 5-
Signature of M
Notary Public: &jM,.a &4�
A
Residing at: -1—co
My Appointment
Expires:
THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY
AUDITOR.
ADUstateinent.doc
Nov 22 04 .01: cap ROBERT M PRIDE INC 425 814 56.72 P. I
Consulting
Robert M. Pride,, Inc. Enginew
November 22, 2004
Mr. Jon Xvemmo
z
Hillcrest Construction Co. Inc.
4003 Nassau. Place
0,
Bverd±WA 98201
Re: Report on Geotechnical Investigation D
Proposed R2sidential Project
M
72q Avenue West DEC a 2004.
MU
0
Wmonds,.Washin&n
0 .0
RMP PrqJect No. 04-187-OIL PER�Aff G
M M
z
I)ear Mr. RvemIno,
jo -1
This Mport presents the rmlts (If our recent exploration program at the site ofyour
proposed residence located at the north end of ?2pd Place West in Edmonds. It is
understood that the idence footpiftt has been modified to provide for a Off Of
res
O.M.
-n
72nd place instead of the 7oth Place cul-de-sac on the cast side of the property. Revised
plans for this project were prepared by Lee Yjrk AIA dated September 28, 2oo4, and
mm,
ffiey were used as a reference for this supplemental report. Our preliminary
0
geotechnical report submitted on June 28,2004 provided basic design criteria forthe
0'r
C M
midence foundations, and will be superceded by this design report.
M W,
M
z
-velop a
Atutal Of five exploratory test pits were dug on the slope and level pad areas to de
>
soil proffle under the proposed residence. Maximum depth of these test pits was nine
Z.
feet, and their locations are shown on the attached Drawing No. 1. Summary logs of the
X
five test pits am shown on Table No.- I.
z
Ewh of the Mloratory pits dug on the slope showed a thick lqw of topsoil and
al so wen
colluvial deposits within the upper 3 to 4 feeL Below the silty sand colluvL as
0
M
outwash soils consisting of fine to medium silty sands and san&-. These &cW Outwash
'deposits were medium dense to dense and extended the full length oftbe west fficing
slope on the property. Fill soils exk on the upper s to 6 feet of this native slope, and
they support the westerly end of the paved cul-de-sac on 7oth Place located at the tDp of
this slope.
"rest Ift TP-3 and TP-4 located at the southwesterly corner of the proposed tesidence
encountered fM soils and organic debris that had been buried in an old drainage Swale
that otiginatedontbowest-mnterof-thispropeTtT DWh of this organic fill ranged
7.
1320314ohn PVWt Wye NE KINaM. WA Oft#
Phom., 425-814-WO Fox 425-814-6M
NOV ez U4 U1:UUP ROBERT-M PRIDE INC 425 814 5612 P.2
November 22, 2004
Mr. Jon Kvernmo
Page:?.
from 6 to 8 feet, and the fill did not extend as far as the southwest comer of the
f ai uvial ar to
Ootprint. Below the fill was a thin topsoil layer underl n by coll S09S SiMil
ot Ound,
those encolintered in the test pits on the slope. Groundwater Seepage was n f in
any of the test pit explorations.
z
Founda o ommendgpi—ons
--AjQL Ego —
0
M
On the basis of our supplemental investigation and eDgineering evaluation of the
i
subsurface soil conditions on this site, there are fill soils and loose colluvial deposits on
or)
10
this site that Will requi re modifications to the foundation systern. Existing fill in the old
C M
drainage channel that extends into the central portion of the site will recrAre the use of
M 0
�1' I
pipe piles along the entire west side of the proposed residence fowdation. The
.80.1
C:
the ds6ng nabaW slope can be supported by
remmning foundations that extend. into e3d
X M
the ChAwash soils using conventional bearing wall footings. We have dUcussed these
M z
rewmmendations with the archited who is in the process of inoftng the foundation
plans and details.
t1le use of four inch diameter Schedule 80 lie piles that will have a
We recommend p
850#
o -n:
n�
design capacity of ten tons per pile These piles must be driven to rdusal with an
pneumatic hammer mounted on a backhoe. Refusal is based on less than one inch of
X
M M
penetration after three cycles of driving the pipe pile. All piles should be inspected
0
during driving to verify their lo,ad carrying capacity.
or
C M
CO
should be connected with conerm grade beams alone the webt
The. tops of the pipe pil tz.
I
C on
M 0
I z r
tl pe these grdde
walls of the residence. Where the structure extends. easterly i to ie slo
'
beams should be designed for bearing on the native soils at a minimum distance of io
;U
feet from the corner piles at the southwest and northwest corners of the residence.
Foundations placed in direct conwet with the medium dense outwash san dy soils should
z
ue of 2000 psf. This value In
be designed fbr an alloweblesoil beeing val ay: be increased
seis i or wind loading. Settlement of these footings
or temporary mic
by /3 to account f
z
n occur
should not exceed one inch, and a 'majority of this settleme t will during
0
construction of the residenm
0
M
Ret
Concrete retaining -Walls will be constructed around the easterly side of the residence
where it extends into theslope. Design of these retaining walls should be based on
active earth pressures of 35 pef and s5 pd for level and sloping backfill conditions,
it is that the north and south wafls of the house will have level
respectively. jinticipated
bacM, while the east walls will be supporting the rear slope that rises up to the street.
13203 Holme5 Paint Ddve NE MUM, WA.98034
Far. 425-814-5672
Phone; 425-814-3970
nov e-e- ut ui.-uup HUBERT M PRIDE INC 425 814 5672 P.3
November 22, 2004
Mr. Jon Kvenimo
Page 3
Resistance to lateral.loads can be provided by passive earth pressure, and if necessary
friction between the bottom of footings and the uaderl�ying native soils. A passive value
of 200 JX-f may be used for footbrip orretaining walls in direct Contra ct with compacted
backfill. A friction value of 0.3 may be used in conjunction with the recommended
ressure assumed that these ret9hing walls will be designed as a cantilever
passive p it is
and not as braced walls. For braced conditions the east walls should be designed for an:
z
0
-4.
at rest PmS sure of 75 Pcf
M
Tem- sImEg—caval
require temponary slopes cut the,
Construc;don of the reftining walls wi Ao be into
0 M
C
calluvial and Outwash soih-. *For these slopes that may be on the order of 10 to 14 feCt in
IMO :" .
0
height, it is recommended that they be cut at a gradiea no steeper then 1H:i V. if the
-4 0
.0 C
hei h of the temporary cut exceeds ten feet, it is recomme nded that eco -blocks be
8 t
-1
jaced at the toe of the slope against a S )ightlY inclined backeu t. These blocks may
P
M M
z
i in place as part of the backfillo or be removed and repjace with compacted
backfill. All temporary cut slopes should be covered with plastic sheeting and tied down
10
C z
with sandbags during the winter months.
Following completion of the retai ning walls a, inch perfomted subdrain pipe shouldbe
0
11
installed that is embedded in drain graveland wrapped with filter fabrie- The exterior
-4
below grade rebdning walls should be protected with Miradrafn to prevent moisture
direct subsurface seepage down to the subdrain.
M M
0
migration into the living spaces, and to
Discharge of the subdrains and footing drains should outlet Into an approved. storm
0 M
C CO)
drain or to the street
Ch
M 0
Z
Emkoia Qmlml
Constmetion on this site will require installatioln of silt fencing around the lower three
the building area, And placement of quarry spffis from 72ild Place into the
Z
sides of pad
driveway access ramp. Storm water runoff. is not eqxded to be significant from the
slope because of the presence of the upper loose sandy colluvial soils wbich will, absorb
most of any expected rainfiffl. The lower level portion of the site consists prin=fly of
fill most of the site runoff. The silt fencing should
z
0
well -compacted silty that will produce
-e with onsite Outwash sand soils to act as a filter for storm water
be anchored at the bas
M
runoff to be directed toward the natural drainstp coo m. at the north end of the
property -
SUM
We recommend that we be retainedto review those portions of the plans and
Specifications that pertain to foundations and earthwork to detennine that they are
13203 Holmes poird Driye NE Mland, VVA 98034
Fax. 42"14-5672
Phorm: 42&814-3970
Nov 22 0+ 01:08p RO.BERT M PRIDE INC 425 814 5672 P.4
November 22, 2004
Mr. jon Kvemmo
Page 4
consistent with the recommendations of tM% report. Construction monitoring Mid
consultation senriew should also be provided to verify that subsurfma conditions are
on. Should conditions be
similar to those encountered during our field explorat!
revealed during.construction that differ from the anticipated subsurface profile, we will z
0
evaluate those conditions and provide alternative recommendations where appropriate.
0
M
nsion of this irdtial geote6nical
frield constructionservices should be considered an exte
proi
investigation, and are ewential to the determ I nation of compliance with the ect
drawings and specifications. Such activities would include site and slope exc�avations;
excavations for foundatio"s and retaining,walls; pipe pile insullations; subdrain a M
C
installations; and fill phicement and coinpacdon. M
0
0,
0
C
are based on -i) our
The conclusiousand recommendations Presented in this report,
n of soil conditions on the site,:2) confirmatiOu Of the WtUal M'M
nterpretation and evaluatio z
submdace conditions encountered during construction, and 3) the assumptiori that
pha,"- of the > Z
sufficient observation and testing will be provided dwing appropriate
work
-n
0
w". -n
our findings and recommendations of this report were Prepared in 8ccc)rdHn
d in the Puget
By accepted principles a hnical en&eering as Practic-0
)f geoted
genera ake no warranty, either express M M,
Sound am at the tim
e thi., report was submitted. We rn
W
0
or impliedL O.M
C
In 9 CD
please call me if there are any questions regarding the findings and recorn endationsof M 0
Z
this report.
Fke.%�Y. M:
>:
z
-'iv 7.
C&
rt E.
z
0
Principal Ge nical Bagil*r t ,
(i) addressee M
dist:
i) Lee Kirk, AM
encl: Drawing No. i
Table No. I
rmp: HMcmtRftid2
13203 Holmor, Point Drive NE YJMwd, WA 98034 Fa)c 42&8i4-M72
Phone: 42"14-3970
de, E
Nov 22 04 OltCBp ROBERT M PRIDE INC 425 814 5672 .6
P
TABLE NO. 1
Teat Pft No. 1 — SE Cornet
0.0 — 3.0 ft To soil with heavy organics;. silty send, loose, moist, brown;
P
.3.0 — 4.5 ft Silty Sand Outwash deposits; medium dense, moist brown;
Z.
Test Pit No. 2 — SW Comer
0.0 — 2.5 ft Topsoil and organics; silly sand, loose, rMist, brown;
2.6 — 4.0 R Sand and Silty Sand Outwash deposits; medium dense moist;
C
0M
C
M 0.
Test Pit No. 3 — WOW Side
oc�
M
M Z;
0.0 — 8.0 ft Fill; Silty sand and sand with heavy organics, tree limbs and debris;
8.0 — 9.0 ft Sand and Silty Sand Outwash deposits: medium dense, moist, gray and
C
light brown; no groundwater seepage;
>
E:
COY
O.M
-n JD
Test Pit No. 4 — NW Comer
M M
M
0.0 — 6.0 ft Fill; Silty sand and heavy organics with tree 1i bs, and debris; loose,
0 W
0
moist; gray brown;
0 M
C 0),
6.0 — 7.5 ft Sand and Silty Sand Outwash deposits; medium dense, rnoist,. brown;
co)
no groundwater seepage;
M 0
Z
M
Test Ph No. 6 — North Side
0-0 — 3.5 ft Topsoil and heavy organics; Silly sand'. loose, moist, light brown;
z
3.5 6.0 ft Silty Sand and Sand. Outwash deposits; medium dense, moist, light
M
brown and gray; no groundwater Seepage;
Z;
0
0
M
Eagle Eye consulting Engineers, Inc
PO BOX 523
Olafla WA 98359
C:206 356-7790
P:253 857-4151
To: City of Edmonds
Re: Hillcrest Edmonds House
70'h Place W.
.16214
Edmonds, WA 98020
O�
Client Number No: 04-615
F
Eagle Eye Consulting Engineers No: ED 04-50
This project is approved for "Structural Only" Permit only,. The Architectural,
'65 4
3:
M"
Structural, Plumbing,'Afechanical and Ene drawing re iew has been completed and
rgy v
M
e
accepted for permit with the Approved Stamped drawings return d to the City of
0:
-40
0
Edmonds.
C,
M
M z
Your plans are being reviewed concurrently with the Building Department, Planning
Department, and Public Works Engineering. Changes, clarifications or additional
corrections may be required subsequent to the, Building Department review, when
0 -n:.
comments are received from the other concerned depart ments.
-4
M M
'0 r
Should you have any inquiries regarding this letter., please call Hoyt Jeter at (253) 857-,
0 M
ca
4151 between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm.
cl);
mo�
z r
By:
Hoyt.Jeter, PE
President
0
Ct\DommentswW SettingAl-loyADesk-topTagle Lye Co�sulflng Enginceri\PlanReydiw\Kirkland\K[R-03100-01\kirO3lOD-01 Approval lettcr.doc
Hei ht Calculation Worksheet
Address: 7-3
Date:
Inspecto ryv"\ -
i4l
1. Datum Point:
2. Datum Point Elevation:
z
3. Average Grade 75
R
?3.
.4.. Maximum Elevation Allowed: erage giade):+ 25'.-.—.
.-n
5. Referenc e Point Elevation Shot to House:
M
jj,&(datum elevation) + '5 Z(grade to transit level line shot to house)
—10.
0
O:C,
M
.6. Measurements from line shot onto house to i6of ridge:
M z
C z
>
L uj
t
(00
MM
0 r
M
CA
M 0�
z
Total: Los
Z�,
r
Actual Elevation: eference point elevatioi) +341 (measurements
0..
M
from #6) L; 3
Conclusion:
U3 (actu attr less 0, 7S (I
W) is gre; -�allowed); therefore the house is/
is not over the height requirekbe�CDC 16.20.30 requirements
FINAL PROJECT AP`PROVAL FORM
TO:
DATE:
�MO TO:� PERMIT COORDINATOR,BUILDING DIVISION
�NT
FROM FIRE DEPARTME DATE
PLE.ASE SIG N
z
!4,, ENGINEERINGPIVISIONrDATt'�.3-ZZ
V -A
PUZE SIG1Y
PLANNING DIVISION DATE
=55
MEASE SIGN
T
ZI
M
1' 7',
M
kid-
ADDRESS 7
0 (z
.,';,�SITEI
M
4
DATE INSPECTED -3
TERMI L T #24a Z9 X/
Az
_ADB#
C z
��'DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECT D
E
1E
U)
S Ion r
"A, field in pecti waSr Conducted.10 determine compliance with -approved plAn's. Final'arpproval,
-n
n ;d
>
'denotes 'th' at, 'there' are objections: from' the above. signed De' aftment Ior the release of
a:
M M
BONDS.and the granting of:
0. (n
0 r
M
Cn
co
GRANT FINAL. -PROJECT APPROVAL.
Q0
Z
M
;u
z
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
'Copy o f:CONDITIONS gi contractor by inspector
venr to owner/
Z
M
FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OLUSTANDING ISSUES
0 1
Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/c nt,ractor byinpector .
2
3.
OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL.
Pate S ignature
:f0nW:0C
Hern Nd aprvl 3/25/04
P g
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED
SETBACKS ..................... '3 -as C)5
FOUNDATION: e-.-- elcf - 6.
3 - z
Footing ......................
Wall..........................
Pier/Porch ................. 0
Retaining Wall ...........
Slab Insulation ..........
-n
PLUMBING:
cn�
Underground .............. M
M
0
Rough -in ................... .
0
C
Commercial Final ......
M
ITI
z
HEATING:
C
Gas Test ................... > z
Gas Piping ..................
0 -n
Equipment ................. -n
Commercial Final .......
M M
0 0)
EXTERIORSHEATHING 0 -
r
NAILING ....... ............. 0 M
CO)
FRAMING ........................
M 0
Z
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING... 711
INSULATION ................... M_q
Floor Insulation ......... >
z
Wall Insulation ...........
Ceiling Insulation ....... z
0
SHEETROCK NAILING ... 11
0
M
SPECIAL INSPECTION ...
C)- SIt
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY ...................
Side Sewer 0....160 q
#00
10
AMout PhId r"emlop
D�teLgue
Water Meter Size---
AmountPaId
DatePUrchased
ZOIV#
The Initials MT are Milton
Amount Paid
r75 Thompson, a wiliporary contract
-or th' City.
.4 inspector f e
Id
4tj2- �1