The URL can be used to link to this page

20050250.pdfDATE Ftl�(�EIVED P CITY OF EDMONDS N CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION Jo C ON S T AD AN' 0 OWNER NAMEINAME OF BUSINESS W ER NAME IN PL K� to L FMAILING 0: U.1 j ADDRESS vp PU 0 4 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EX R NAME 1�12\ I= ADDRESS R 0 e� CITY ZIP . TELEPHONE 47 NAME CBLp1 T? ADDRE�S z CITY VjFr TELEPHONE 0 U STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED B ZI V/", 4x 0 C 'PRQPI�RTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. v W _j S NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR MIXED USE CHANGE OF USE REMODEL MULTIFAMILY SIGN REPAIR R71. GRADING FENCE �al ?. 6 7 CYOS ( X_ FT.) I El DEMOLISH 13 TANK OTHER GARAGE RETAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER El J=J GARPORT ROCKERY FIREALARM ft Q. E (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR,�CTIVITY) EXPLAft 4; U W, Uj NUMBER OF NU ER OF TDiAMBLLING 0 STORIES UNITS U DESC-RIBE WORK TO BE DO 0A.) u4f.�A. A.) to 4 (AM yy�-k XT �SOURCE 4E LOT SLOPg,6 771E STED DATE q7o AN CHECK NO: THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK 40TED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUI31C DONMAIN (CURBS. SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES. ETC.) WILL RCOUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT APPLICATION: SEE ECDC 19LOO.005(A)(5) PERMIT LIMIT. SEE CCDC 119.00,005(A)(15) SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BE14ALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY. WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINA NCE 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN 19 CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMPENSAT.1,��&�RANCE AND RCW 18:27. 31 TURE WNkR 0 G f DATE SI NED [PERMIT EXPIRES RMIT .�4 0 /'� I UMBER B IZI IITFIAPT# DRESS AT NAME/SU BDIVI SION NO. I LOT NO. LID NO LID FEE S BLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved C3 cl RW Permit Requited Street Use Permit Requited C3 ISTING PROPOSED inspection Required [3 Sidewalk Required 13 EQUIRED DEDICATION FT Underground Waing required C3 METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES13 NOO z EMARKS WNERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLIDRAINAGE W z W r. g .:�/ /y /�l ec 1;tn/r:',,LJ Lz IV/.., I- it-1. fit %,f.v 6 9L 17,� L, /%,, 'A u r- LAl f eo )f kN,4'1 NA qGINEERING REVIEWED, BY DATE I I I " If to' , i, ( 115"c Rli� �AO 1,12 1 a i =��K VARIA dwu" ffiORE-L-INE OR AD134 INSPECTION SEPA REO'D " - 113 COMPLETED EXEMPT YES GYNO Ad L) 4 �- ZONE SIGN AREA HEIGHT fAIVER I ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED TUDY [3 I -2s) LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT URSIDE REAR 3,7 5 z z z PARK ING LOTAREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE REO'D 7. PROVIDED 1 1 .3 4 c - -3 , IEMARKS k1l, A c rv, rYPE 05 CONSTRUCTION V/_3 SPECIAL INSPECTION REOUIRED'M��ES OCCUPAN GROUP OCCUPANT LOAD REMARKS' 3ECITECH.5VPOI�T 3Y: JESIGN.. STRUCT2� 3Y ,, VALUATION Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge Building Permit City Surcha rge Plumbing Base Fee Mechanical Grading el? Yzel Engr. Review / I A Engr. Inspection Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit /�'/!�2, Fire Inspection Receipt # Landscapelnsp, Total Anil, Due Recording Fee Receipt APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not it permit until signed by the CALL Building Official or his/her Deputy and Fees are paid. and FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided F CIALS SIGNtTURE I(AT5 (425) ON, f I I -VJ 4 A59D BY ATE TEN ON EXTS 1333 T IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI- ORIGINAL FILE YELLOW - IN�PECJOR FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED, URC109 / 110C1110 / IRC110. PINK OWNER GOLD - ASSESSORi 1111111,11 nn"C'11`0 U A nr% V^1 I A 00 RA A Vlkltv—% A f%f%MICC z 0 4 0 M :q:9 W M C: M 0 -10 0 M M z () -11 CE -1 3: 0 -n n -4 x M M 0 0 0 M a C/) C Cn M 0 Z X z z 0 1 0 IT! I .......... ^U&V (00. ct"�4 A� -07 COW, F&A-V t6 �lc 0 m Ul 0 m 'Vey lot. V2 c C,4 ot C) m 0 --i o c M ITIZ CL jo >m wAW-P- CD 0 -Tl LL cr- TWI CL 0 0 R IE—V I S 10 N �t iz P4 0, Or-, lw 0 M 0 MAR Y 2006 Co P rel CD 'PARTMEN-r ......—SUILDING. DE M 0 (-,IV OF EDMOND Z r- to 40 E v li $32; 10 N X z ? t Wli 12006 t*r-1 Z-f ^A*.Mw " xo,F� a sw At7 �10 &- o^*PuAriou. om�ft v-01 cq% Sqit�o &J,1.0ING DEPARTMENT CDMONDS z Ick "-S 249 -IAAO*- 14. 4k"(k-( CA& A-X" 1-01 JS LO 2.LS k<-, ap Wok5 14ah" '2,2440 100- CD1 426d<)" ujgx..% a 5vtkA ioS to+' 10 15 *T b WWA a44ef i;. .11 ji. or 10 4- *v loo 1 5 top (94 GARY HAAKENSON ITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwadedmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building Engineering C. V" August 24, 2005 Z 0 Carl Snodgrass 15238 Moonglow dr. 0 M Romona, CA 92065 n CD Re: Permit 2005-0250 200 Th Ave M, C M 0 It has been brought to the City's attention through a formal Citizen's complaint C that we do not have -a true and accurate plot plan on file for. the above issued j permit Per Survey on file with the City, dated 9/10/1987there is a 10' w ide* side 1, ; MZ. sewer easement across the NE portion of the lot as well as a 5' waterline 4" easement along the Soutl -i. Please resubmit a true and accurate plot plan showing all, easements and, an "as -built" location of the house by September 9, o -n -n 2005 in order to avoid a Stop Work'Order. MM 0 0- r 0 M�. Sincerely, C Cal C CA: Q 0, Z r jeann ine Graf Buildin Official 9 Z Cn Z 0 M L\Temp\DST's\N,1as1c1 Letter.s\Address change lncorporat�,d August 11, 1890 x GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS. WA98020 (425) 771-0220�- FAX (425) 771-M21 Website: wwadedmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT C) Planning - Building - Engineering October 24, 2005 Zi 0 Mr. Carl Snodgrass 15238 Moonglow Drive co X� Roi -nona, California 92065 M C Mal Or RE: Building Permit #2005-0250 @ 200 7"' Avenue North, Edmonds Oc, Dear Mr. Snodgrass: M M io Z The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the as -built plot plan submitted to the City oil August 29, 2006 (revised on October 6, 2005) has been rejected due to legibility. 0 -n Th' e ity requires a pristine, I egib.le, aS7buil1,.tru6,and.accurate plot plan.to be, submitted by November.912005.. Prior'submittals showing previous dates, notations,. handwrlitten 'notes, etc.,: M T shall not be accepted. Cl) 0 r 0M C Because State Archives Law requires plot plans to be copied with the building perillit and be �Mo retained virtUally for the life of the house it is imperative that the City obtains a legible plan, 117 'submitting Z there are circumstances beyond your control that will prevent YOU. from Such a plan X -ni by the November 9"' deadline please infot my office immediately and provide ail alternate date of submittal. Failure to respond to this request may result in a STOP WORK order being issued on the construction project. Z Lastly, please be advised all work perfon-ned under an inaccurate plot lan is at the p Z builders/h.ome owners risk and any.work in violation of City'bUlk zoning standards, i.e., setback .0 regulations, shall be removed. 0. M Sincerely, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Harris Land Development Incorpomted August 11, 1890 Sister Citv - Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATION Avenue Nort s, WA Location of Violation (Address and Tax Account Parcel No): 200 7"' h, Edmond z 98020 Tax Account Parcel No. 00434208603901 0 M Issued To: Carl Snodgrass, Property Owner C5 C M Address Of Person This Order Is Issued To: 15238 Moona low Drive, Romona, CA 92065 M 0: 0 0 C Code Section Violated:. International Residential Bu ilding Code Section R106 M M z C De scription of Violation: Failure to submit true and accurate, legible, as -built P lot plan for new single co 1h family construction at 200 7 Avenue North in Edmonds under building permit #2005-0250. M Corrective Action Required: Submit legible, as -built, true and accurate plo plan. M Vi 0 r 0 Mr C ca C erection is Required no later than: 5:00pm time) November 29, 2005 date) o mo, z -4 if correction is *not made by the date and time specified in the Order, a. Notice of Z' Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civ il Violation shall assess fines of 4 X. $100.00 per day or portion of a day, during which the violation continues. Z� ?5 M Date Posted: ate Mailed: November 10, 2005 Date Served D uin Part Jeannine L. Graf Title Building Official Iss g y signature 77 Cc: Harris Land Development .......................... GARY HAAKENSON. C ITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR v UE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 121 5TH AVEN Website: www.dedrnondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering January 4, 2006 Z� Mr. Carl Snodgrass 0 M 15238 Moon glow Drive Romona, California 92065 Co. RE: Building Permit #2005-0250 @ 200 7"' Avenue North, Edmonds 01 0 Dear Mr. Snodgrass: 3: M, M Z In response to City letter dated October 24, 2005 your contractor approached the City and Z' -ortunately, as of requested additional time to i nid December to Submit an as -built plot plan. Unf this date no plan has been received. The City requires a pr istine, legible, as -built, true and accurate plot plan to be submitted by 0 n January 17, 2006. Prior submittals showing previous dates, notations, handwritten notes, etc. shall not be accepted. 0 0) 0 aw.requires plot plans to be. copied with the building pen -nit and be Because State Archives L, 0 a M, retained virtually for the life of the house it is imperative that the City obtains a legible plan. No 01 Z further extensions shall be granted in this matter and failure to respond to, this request shall result in a STOP WORK order being issued on the entire construction project on January 1.8, 2006. Lastly, please be advised all work performed under an inaccurate plot plan is at the Z builders/home owners risk and any work in violation of City bulk zoning standards, i.e., setback regulations, shall be rem oved. Z: .0 Sincerely, 0 Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Harris Land Development Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan L GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORP i EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwxi.edmondsmams DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 111 C. 1) Planning - Building Engineering January 18,2006 Z' .0 Mr. Carl Snodgrass 0 15238 Moonglow Drive Romona, California 92065 th RE: Building Permit #2005-0250 @ 200 7 Avenue North, Edmonds ni M 0. —40. 0 Dear Mr. Snodgrass: C, As a f a copy.or a STOP -ollow-up to City letter dated January 4, 2006, enclosed please find M M Z WORK order posted oil the subject construction site today in Edmonds Washington. As yoL a c Z aware, since September 8, 2005 the City has been working with you to obtain a pristine, legible, true and accurate, as -built, plot plan for your house construction. The City's last recourse in this CO) matter was to stop construction today at your site and impose Notice of Civil Violation fines in 0,1 n. -n the amount of $ 100.00 per day until this matter is resolved (copy of Notice. also enclosed). M M It is not the City's intent to cause YOU Undue hardship however compliance to tile codes is 0 mandatory for the fair and equal treatment of all citizens 0 M C co 9 co Be advised all work perfon ned under an inaccurate plot plan is at tile bUilders/home owners risk M 01 Z F_ and any work in violation of City bulk zoning standards, i.e., setback regulations, shall be removed. This project is STOPPED WORKED Until further notice.. Fines of $100.00 per day are Z� r immediately imposed and due to the City. We strongly urge. you to immed iately resolve the X. co violation by submitting a pristine, legible, as -built, true and accurate plot plan to the City for Z review. 0 M Sincerely, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Harris Land Development Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 7710220 NOTICE OF CIVIL. VIOLATION h Location of Violation (Address and Tax Account Parcel No): 200 7' Avenue North, Edmonds, WA Tax Account Parcel No. 00434208603901 Issued To: Carl Snodgrass, Property Owner -n Vi Address Of Person This Order Is Issued To: 15238 Moonglow Drive, Romona, CA 92065 OM. C M 0 0 C Code Section Violated:. International Residential Building Code Section R106 X M M n Description of Violatio Failure to submit true and accurate, legjble, as -built olot Wan for new singLe Cz > family construction at 200 7th Avenue North in Edmonds under building permit #2005 -0250. 0 -n n Corrective Action Required: Submit legible, as -built, true and accurate plot plan. :1C M M 0- r 0 M Be advised,.the person(s) to whom this Notice is issued is being assessed $100.00 per day, or portion C CA M 0. of a day, during which the violation continues. The imposed monetary penalties are immediately z r due and payable to the City of Edmonds at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 during normal City business hours. Fines shall continue to accrue.at the rate of $100.00 per day until this I atter is resolved to the satisfaction of the Cit� n y. > Further, if correction is not made by 5:00pm (time) FebruM 3, 2006 (date) an abatement notice may be vi Issued warning of impending City abatement of the violation. Any. and all costs, including incidental z costs, will be added to the monetary penalties assessed against the person(s) to whom the Notice is issued. 0 Note, this decision is appealable to the City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner by filing a. complete M, appeal application including written notice of appeal with the Development Services Director no 'ling fee is $605.00. later than February 3, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. The appeal fi Date Posted: JanuM 18, 2006 Date Mailed: Januajy 18, 2006 Issuing Party: Jeannine L. Graf Title: Cijy Building Official Signature: p A A A A A I A A A. A A A p A 0 4 A A A I A A Ao A I I A I A, No- T 1- 1 1 A .1 A I A A I N 9 Noo I� . 1. 1 1 - A - , t '1 0 to. 1 4 A A A 0 1 0 A p o z 0 A A A A I A A. 4- A. P": A . A A A . I . I A A . I A A A A A � - A I A I %, A A or A A I A 1 4' At of At I -,A A A v -,A 4-1 A. At t 4, A. I, A A A o A, A A A I I A A 11. 4 1 1 A At, A o A I A A I A A I A I A !ItIA I I A I LI4 I., I p L % I I A A I .. .... I A tIA 0 A A. .1 At 4 .1 X . A 6 1 A I A I I A A (� AAA A A I I A A A I I A d A ; I - A I of A A 1. A AA -, A A A A 0 1. 1 A A A 1. A I p I. I A A A A AI. to A A r A A A I I A A It do A., .No. AT ;f I 1 0 1 A fro ", A A A, A A 4 1 0 A A of A A At; I 1 0 A o0': A I A A too, .4 AL " A I A to 4 of I I A A A A A A,I I A of A A I A I A A I A A ILL: A 1 7 A A 1 4 A I A . A- A oil- 1 It 1. IIA; A. A I I S' A I A A A I A A Ik f A, I fo� .4. 1 A A 7 A A L r A I I A A I I A A A I I A A I A I A A AA A .1 A A I Not A I A A I I A A A I A- o 0 A I A- I AAA I A I lem -iog. I A F A .-d A . It -1 4* of 1 A A 'po Ao p Al I -o- A I A ?J,, A I . :t . . I A I Ao I I. A I A A, A A A A t 5, A I k A A o p I I A. A A 0 A A 4 A. I A At A A A p A I A A It A I I p _4 I, A I I , 1 1. A AA4 A I A I A o A A A I A I A I A A A I A NIA. A.q k. tON, L A I o A .61; 1 t I I A A I A AA I t A A 4 A A I A; A I. AN A IS A A I I I A A . A I t A . I 4 A I A I I A A I I f . I A. 4. A A o At A A N AT 1 1. 1 L A 1). do I- A I- A, A 4- -7fA-- A. A;'- AAA- A At I I I IL I IA A A I I A, 4 1 A I : A of I A A I p 1 4. 1, 1 A A A I J.4,� 1% to 4 . A I A A No 1. A 4 A I I A P. A A I AA A, A AM .0 %, J fr�.� ",.t 1, .1 Ar Ott A 6 1 A I I I A A 4 A, I AAA. A A A A . A .'I' A A A p A I A I I A I A A A.4 'At It A I I a - A I, I I I I A A A A A, A 0 1 A A k 4 1 1 1 1 A 1 4 p I A : -I: I A to i k A A I A A 1. A I 1 .1 A A . I A` I A A A A A 1.11 � I A A I I 'of A N J. AAA A A, A I A I A I w of I, p A i Atto no Aofoo� .61. .,.6 1 IOWA Lbf,dft : tr i I 44 A% 4: ��t R **Idin%g-,"O Idal. I'M h A o jA,Af.o 1.. 1. 1 . I fo A I I 1 0 1. A I y oPir. f A I 'A I A , :o� I No 1 6 .. k I, I I A A. A I A . I I I �� 4 A A. I A, A A A A A 0 'a A. A d I A off A or A A q. 1%ol- I I I . . . A I A 1 4 1 1 1 . I I , I , A A A A I food AAA A. , 1; A ; I A I I I. A I A I , '- � I I If A, J. .,A I I I p A A A A A, A . A I A A 0 A: A A", )At A 1. 1 A A . A A A A. I .. t R A. I. I A. A A Ir I A A . . I A I I* : , A A A A A 1:13tyo -Ed'mon A.: I A I I 4A A ds --oo I A A I, , , "A.". A A A , I i I I o A A I A P I AAA, A 1 4 A A . I ... - I 1 1. A . A. A A . I I I I I I A, 1. A I A A ff �( A . .. A . A I A A . .. 1..4 1 1 I k 1. 1 y I I A I A AAA A I r A. v, A I o A A. IN A of rolk A A A , � I - I I Ito A III "ft., I I I dj,,,� AAA iA A A A A A L A A A 1 A 6. . ) o. A I A . i I t I - I I I A I q A . I r AAA 11 A I I I , p I I A I I p I A I A L I A A k I A f A A. I I I I it, , 7� A� of, 1Ao I I I A A I; A A I ... A t I A "IN A if .1 p 1 11 A I A I A A A A I TA s A A A I A I F I AN A a, At A A, I I I A I . A I A A A AN A A I A I I A I AAA A 16 to In A A A A N.- A. I I A A 0. It A I I A to 1AIP Op t 'Lot .7 % �* A A I I A a, I A to - I, - A 7o� A A r s r I I A I. I A A AS t* - ..... I AlF onsAre 0 dered to: I A I A A A if -I "I A: .1 A Ao. I I I A I A A I *A -1 -. 11 . I A , . . A , I . I I %. A I I A A I .,At � #1 1 1 1 1 1 A A I . L I I A A I I I I I A A A I 1 AAA A, A 11 1 , , . t A I A . A A A . o AT I A 'I,' A IAAqAA, to-, It' L A . I '. I A Am- A-, 14. to joh V r A or,;; I AN 1 lot. A A k* I A A I I A I A I A o. A A A 4 A I Ar A, I I A. 0 - A, of. I A A I t A A I A A, A- A I A A If 1 4 A A 11 1 1 1 1 1 A A I A A A A I# of qv roo, 0 000ffo�. 0 %.1 A., A, I A A, A oo" A A A A A A A A .,.A I At I I I A 1, 4.1 -.Y ILK 1 4 A t N A. I A A At IV '" I t. A A jr,to- I , SoF4- '- 1��I: jAill k"'A, I o# A W 4 A A .Q46 A" to, A%-, A 4. A j A , o A 4 or I r1o:;7IN or A Atot- A I". I SO". I fA, I A ( I I , A I I A . p A A L A A 1. t., Ali. a e A, I r A - A A. A At ""444 p (I A 4. A A A ) A 1 .1 1 A I p I I i* At .1. A ...... J. 41 A I A A ot, AA.14, & -A, A FJ. A A '1 -1,". At oo,v t to., A .1 A .1 A A, A I A A A: ..Alt A;Tv.. oi -A A at JA�l j Aoo� o A - - - - j, 11 . I I I A. -,I I A 1 1 if A if I A, A. 'Joko, 14e,*( A * 1" " %ff�%A` 4 A I, A. I ,A rp,6� I A I At F.r. I A A t A "AI A. A A L% I L A 4 do oo,� .4 �r. , A A, : A -A A. I "s -AAf Am 'A, I ,AD, to A- p - A A A At A - A I I k, I I; ,:r. AAA ,A A A, too, It A - A A A 11.1 A A A At I !IZ A L A, At ijA 0 A A I A- ..I , I A - , A'.. A, I . I `� I A A I k, to At A A oo, A ; 1 0 A� A L A 11 o. I A A, A, I . I I A t �i�- �� A' o A 1 4. A I 'AAA. bi AL .% poi't A V Tot too, -Ai '14 0 A. I AAA A .'I A A A AAA A. A: 4 A AIN r A A 'OR I I A I 'A Ao 'L 4 A A A t A s A T.: W...... A A f A A I' A. 1 0 to I k I A - I At , I I A 'A., "ItiL A. I ; to I A A AAA, LAI- A A o J, AAA I I A 4 A F. A of 'A A I A o Afoo p 4 A. A A A AAA A A A I to, At 61 A A o L A A a A AA4' of A A 44., o A, I A -Ar A .6 p ILA:T�.:AIIII i. A Ar A A AAA 1 $ I : A I., A A $I A A , � r 4 I., - A A T L ',A' A3 ot? A A A, 41,oa -l4b, , A 'A A L: No A %W. Noo�"- . . I I k , . A. AIAL fp�I A it'. A I , A I A go A A L I A It Ao, A I A N g . .' N4 A A I I L A A T I I A, A A A 1 .11 1 A A I A A I A I A, A 1 14 1 I A I A L. to I L L'.,, I I. '. I A A A of Ad At Ato A I I L I A 1 1'. -,A A I A I A A A i A I, I A A A AF I L; AAA 'A A ji, A A, I A A AIN I A A. A :' L' . .. A 1 11 A -1 A I 1 11 -.%A A 0, A A A I A A. A I A A-, AA 40 1 o A I A A A A 1. 1 A A I A of L� A I A I A A% A , &*I� " A A .1. A., -o-A-1 '!eN A $L P' A.. I , � I ... I A .. -.A A A A Atio I I A A A ot, L 1 0 1 t ti A A A I L m A A off-A-1 foon Cf) --fool 7 M c m U 0 fo-o 0 0 c T. M M Z 0 foo-ol c Ato > ;7 r- -o :::i m -< co 0 A -An n M -j > :E Z,' I m M "o Cl) 0 rAAAA`A n m CIA) cn m (A) zrAA`A` M z co z 0 A-A-1 0 m A A A A A I A A I A A A GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 Website:. www.d.edrhondsma.us, DEVELOPM ENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building Engineering January 24, 2006 Z. 0, Mr. Carl Snodgrass M� 15238 Moonglow Drive Romona, California 92065 Co, RE: SFR @ 200 7"' Avenue North, Pen -nit #2005-0250 M M a Notice of Civil Violation Dated 1/ 18/06 and Stop Work Order 0 0 0 C M Dear Mr. Snodgrass, M z 10-1. > z The City is in receipt of a revised plot plan dated 1/24/06 in response to the Notice of r CA Civil Violation dated January 18, 2006 for the subject project. The STOP WORK order 0,-n is hereby lifted in this matter and work on the project May continue. The City will review the revised plot plan in a timely manrier. If additional information is required you agree M to respond immediately. , Please be advised, occupancy of the residence shall not be M granted until the plot plan is approved by the City 0 r OM. Regarding the Notice of Civil Violation fines (accumulated to $700.00 as of today) the M 0!. z City agrees to reduce the amount to $200.00. Payment shall be 111ade.directly to the City r of Edmonds. Regarding the general contractor of record for your pern ase meet immediately with -iit; ple Z. the Permit Coordinator and change all necessary records to reflect the correct general contractor of record for the project. Fa. z 0.1 Thank you for your prompt response in this matter. M Sincerely, Jeannine L. Graf. Building Official Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Citv Hekinan, Japan GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.cLedmondsma,us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning Building Engineering C. March 21, 2006, Charles R. Warner z 0 23632 Hwy 99, Ste. F, PMB 140 0 M Edmonds, WA 98026 1h n Sidewalk Improvements SUBJECT: Waiver Request o at 200 7 Ave N. (building permit :q 9 number 2005-0250) M C Dear Charles: M 0 0 0 C The City is in receipt of your request dated March 15, 2006, for a waiver of the sidewalk 3: M M Z installation requirement for your project At the subject address. While sidewalks are required as a condition of approval per the Sidewalk Construction Policy. contained in the adopted December Z' 2002 update to the City of Edmonds Transportation Plan and ECDC 18.90.030, you have r requested that the City review this project site and code requirements for a determination of Cn economic unfeasibility (Sidewalk Construction Policy 3.2.b). 0 -n As stated in your letter, there is a steep grade, a 6' structural retaining wall and a traffic guard rail M rn between the existing edge of pavement and the property line on Bell Street. In order to construct the sidewalk along Bell Street, not only would a new retaining wall have to be constructed to 0 0 r M support the road and sidewalk, the existing guardrail would have to be relocated behind the C: Cn. sidewalk. M 0 z r The benefit of a sidewalk within the City right-of-way at this location does not out weigh the cost X of engineering, design and construction, of the sidewalk and retaining wall on Bell Street. Therefore, the City is in concurrence that this is economically unfeasible in accordance with ECDC 18.90.030.B. Z Therefor*e, the City of Edmonds has determined that sidewalks will not be required on Bell Street ch, Z:. as a condition of approval for the construction of the single family residences at 200 7"' Ave W. 0 0 M Since r ASincer d K. Gebert, RE I K. Gebert, P.E. City Engineer Cc: Street file P -nit file en S:\ENGR\PRIVATE DEVELOMENT PROJECTS\DEI'ERMINATIONS\Sidewalk Determinations\200 7th Ave IN Snodgrass sidewalks.doc Incorporated August 11, 1890 MEMORANDUM Date: 21 Mar 06 To: File 200 7"' Ave N. Z. From: Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Program Manager 0 T Subject: Waiver request of sidewalk improvements at 200 7"' Ave N. 3: Qrn C Chuck Warner, the developer of the subject property , submitted an e-mail 15 March 06, M requesting not to install, sidewalks along Bell Street because it is economically infeasible due to 0 --I i �: 0 an existing 6'. high structural retaining wall with a 1: 1 slope above it, and traffic guardrail that is 0 C installed between the street edge and property line. 3: M M A site visit was conducted 20 March 2006, todetermine if it was economically feasible to C Z. construct a sidewalk along Bell Street. Based on field observations, the existing retaining structure and guardrail are indeed between the road edge and property line. The grade difference between the yard and the road above is approximatel 14'. In order to construct a sidewalk along y 0 the property frontage on Bell Street, a new 15' high retaining wall would have to. be constructed (the existing wall must be left in place because it supports the road), and the area backfilled so M rn the sidewalk could be installed. In addition, there would have to be sufficient room to install not 0 r only a handrail behind the sidewalk, but also relocate the guardrail between the sidewalk and 0 rn retaining wall. C ca C M rn 0, Z Although a.retaining wall could be constructed the guard rail relocated and the sidewalk constructed, the cost to construct a sidewalk would not out weigh the cost of engineering, design and construction of the retaining wall, grading and relocation of the guardrail. For these*reasons, it was determined to be economically infeasible toconstruct a sidewalk along the property z frontage on Bell Street. ;t C0 DETERMINATION: z 1. Construction of a sidewalk along the property frontage on Bell Street will not be required as a condition of development. 0. M Appro '65'vid K. Gebert, PE, City Engineer Ro6phave, Planning Manager City of Edmonds SAENGRTRIVATE DEVELOMENT PROJECTS\DETERMINATIONS\Sldewalk Determinations\200 7th ave-snodgrass sidewalk mem.DOC March 15,2006 Charles R. Warner 23632 Hwy 99, Ste. F, PMB 140 Edmonds, WA 98026 425-773-1476/FAX 742-5047 Maplewoodbuild@hotmail.com Dave Gebert, PE z City Engineer 1215"' Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 q:w' RE: Waiver of Sidewalk Requirement Cn 3: a rn C rn 01 Dear Mr. Gebert; O� .0cl M Please accept this formal request for a waiver of sidewalk improvements pursuant to M z 1h ECDC 18.90.030(B), special circumstances, at 200 7 Avenue North. 10-1. Z > Currently, a new single family residence is under construction. (permit 2005-0250, ROW 2005-0079). As discussed with city staff at time of permit issuance, existing right. -of -way 0 n . -n and site conditions relating to steep slopes/retaining walls preclude any practical or economically feasible manner to construct a sidewalk. M M 0 Special Circumstances as Foll ows: 0M C 1. Retaining Wall — An existing 6'. Structural Retaining wall was built in the City M0 Z Right of Way at the south property line to shore the road base for Bell Street east 1h of 7 Avenue North. X 2. Steep Slopes — A existing 1: 1 fill slope sits ato the retaining wall described in p Z� Item I to within 3' of the pavement edge at Bell Street. Total relief from Bell Street to finished grade is as much as 14'. Co z 3. Traffic, Guard Rail — An existing traffic guard rail wraps the Right of Way 0 corner along the entire frontage at Bell Street and continues approximately 35' rn north on 7" Avenue North. Both streets rise steeply away from property and traffic guard rail is necessary to prevent serious consequences from a vehicle leaving the roadway at the subject property. The distance from the face of the guard rail to the edge of pavement is approximately 18", leaving no room for a sidewalk. A concrete sidewalk has been installed to city standards along the frontage of that portion, of 7"' Avenue North that is not impeded by the traffic guard rail . Snodgrass Sidewalk — Page I Please call if you have any questions regarding this request. Thank You! Sincerely, Charles R. Warner . 0, m M M 0: 0 C� 3: m m Z. C 0 -n -n A m 0 o Fn' V) K CA, Z CD Snodgrass Sidewalk — Page2 Height Calculation Worksheet Address; ArtA\J Date: Inspecto r(s): V 1. Datum Point: 2. Datum Point Elevation: 00,oc) Z 3. Average Grade: L* .4. Maximum Elevation Allowed: L3 a (ive ra'g e- &de)'+** 25,*-;= U5 M. 5. Reference Point Elevation Shot to House: M 00 0� ON's, (datum eleva on) + 3,0 (grade to transit level line'shot to house)= C M M z 6. Measurements from line shot onto house to b6of ridge: 3 'T X U5, 0 -n -n MM U5 om� C CA C CI) �Mo z 3: Z' Total z :d 0 M Oy.- 0 7. Actual El vation. point elevation) + (reference ),(measurements from ft) Conclusion: (actual) is greater l(r( '?- ;s th. wed); therefore the house b/ is not over the height requiremen-Up—er E C 16.20.30 requirements DAILY FIELD REPORT TRAVEUPRER TIME 1%19 jo JMBER. L4 7 1. M9111 Test Point Number Location L Fill Depth Feet Elevation Feet Moisture Content % D ry I Density pef 11 Max. Dry Density pef Percent Compaction; NOTES: A to Mg v 91,0 MM*7 OEM dam "A Rik HvAmm I z 0 m =i:-n M CITY CO PY Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geole6finical /Civil Engineer m.S.G.E.. M.8.A. t April 14, 2004 0 city of Edmonds M c/o Aaron and Chloe Cerutti A.C11h pl.. W Edmonds, WA 98026 Vi ti Subject: Geotechnic al Evaluation Foundation Recommenda ons M C M 0 202 71h Ave.,, Edmonds, Washington -40 0 0 Proposed Cerutti Residence C This engineering roport presents the results of a ge tjleL;l it iicai evaluation OT the This M M z --I 1h Aaron and Chloe Cerutti property a t 202 7 Ave., Edmonds, Washington. as well as city of Edmonds > --4 evaluation was required dLJF to nwnpr nt-inc-erns, r 3: requirements. 0 -n REFERENCES: Property lot layout (furnished by owner) Sit Plan (furnished by owner) MM 0 C0 0 r- 0 Proposed Residence Plans e Photographs dated April 6, 2004 Dy L Bruce, P.E. C M K ca M 0 Z pACKO-ROUND. 1h Ave. is rectangular in.shape and consists of Lot The overall property at 202 7 60 feet by 110 feet (total). Nos. 39 and 40. overall lot dimensions are approxima tel y f is essenti,, 311y flat, with moderate s lopes in the right-of- The majority of the lot itsel lh Cn way at the location of City of Edmonds street s (7 and Bell). z 0 ical problems with the p roperty: no There are no 0 bvious visual geotechn adation. degr M evidence of slides, 110 sloughing, or any evidence of erosional aining wall e. xisis at the north ecige of Bell AC ity of Edmonds'treated timber ret proximately 4 112. feet retaining wall is ap St. (at 7" Ave.) (see photographs.). This timber distress: no bo winq , no bulginq, or any -iy geotechnical I tall and shows no evidence of at . er understands that h tographs). This engine (see p 0 its of erosional degradation ponsible for evidence installed this timber retaining wall and is res n with no apparent has city of Edmonds to be in excellent conditio ongoing maihtenanc e. The wall appears problems. X'45 S EoEVELOPMENT INSPECTION DI19AINAGE 0551GN PER MIT LEGAL (206) 546-9217 FAX 546-8442 SOILS FOUNOATIL tr Washington 98,55 1 1— -) kJ P.O. Box 55502 Shoreline., L 0 so �Ionwa City of Edmonds c/o Aaron and Chloe Cerutti April 14, 2004 Page 2 The other locatio n on the overall property with slopes is the right-of-way zone immediately adjacent 7 th Ave. This engineer estimates that the slopt, allj at;erlt the paved portion of 7 1h Ave. reposes at an approximate 3H:1V declination. The slope �Z contains mature trees, dense qhriftery, and reveals no evidence of any geotechnical 0 distress: no slides, no sloughing,. or any evidence of erosional degradatiom 0 M This engineer understands that Aaron and Chloe Cerutti propose to build a standqrd single-family residence in the central portion of the overall property with no M cutting of adjacent slopes near the right-of-way (see own er furnished Site Plan). M, M C M 0 0 r EVALUATION. 0 In order tci,2LIament the existing site ge otechnical information; 3 soil tost hole3 C' M M Z were dug by hand on April 6, 2004 in the likely footprint location of the proposed residence. All 3 test holes revealed similar sub -grade cond,itions..namely: Z F_ 0" to 6" Lawn, roots, and organic silt CA, 6" to 15" Sandy loam, grading to me dium dense 0 -n -n sand 15" to 40" (bottom of test holes) Dense slightly silty sands with gravels M M as t holes. All tp.st hnle wall--r, No water was encountered in any of the three te 0 0 M remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving oc curred. C M M 0 Z r CONCLUSIONS i RE coMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation. and experience w ith similar sites in Washington i s eotechnically > roperty at 202 7"' Ave,, Edmonds, the area, the p sil,19le-family residence, subject to the following: for the propust! Z �!�ov�ed No excavation or undormining of the adjacent roa d slopes. Z Standard reinforced continuous and spread footinos, AllowsblP bearing 0 pressure: 2,000 P.S.C. M Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c,f. is recommended for any retaining wall and verified by this engineer. design provi ded'drainage zone is inspected For retaining *w all design, use friction factor of 0. 55 and pass ive pressure of 350 P !WcjL0:aL go/tt/L a5e !j8ujeM Ci(y of edmonds c,/o Aaron and Chloe Cerutti April 14, 2004 Page 3 n concrete er gq�r _tO any foundatio Geotechnical inspections by this engine Placement. z tinuous end The roposed structure can be supported on conventionoi con 0 P ill placed above g on undisturbed native soils or on structural f M spread footings bearin and I.;tnjr.b_jnP.1�FIll for ive soils. See the later sub -section entitled Y_V nat d compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual structural fill placement an enty-four (24) um widths of eighteen (18) and tw spread footings should have m _inimum med at least eighteen (18) inches below the M ectiveiy,'and should be botto C M inches,resp er adjacent finish ground surface. 0 low 0 C avation may be required below MM nding on the final site grades, some over-ekc sad to. fill the over Depe mpetent native soils. Unless lean concrete is u as wide M Z fnotlngs. to exPose CO excavation at the bottom must be at least 10--i cavated hole, the width of the overv. ex and the footing width. For of two times the depth of the over -excavation as the sum tending tw I o feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide example, an over -excavation ex he base of the excavation. t wide at t 0 _n footing must be at.least seven fee -n ay be designed mendations m tings constructed according to the above recom refool. M M Foo sure of two thousand (2,000) pounds per squa able soil bearing pres e may be used when 0 CD for an allow rease in this design bearing pressur 0'r-, criteria, it is 0 M A one-third inc cismicloado. For the 3bove desigh C 0). onsidering short-term wind or s C t-construction settlement of footings founded oil competent, C CD that total poS s) will be about one-half M 0 anticipated to five (5) feet in thicknes Z snils (or on strurtkiral fill up n the order of one -quarter inch. inch, with differential settlements on -excavated and p.s.f. app!ies to over city of 3,000 f r 2,000 P.s.f > NOTE The bearing caPE tive soils may be designed o z ced on na nditions. Footings Pla backfill CO be resisted by friction between forces may CO seismic, Anting on the Lateral loads due to wind or rth pre.-ssurP, 0 the bearing soils, or by. passive ea dition, the foundations z thc.foundatione, and For the latter con mbedded portion$ of the foundatio soil or the bacXfill placed around the 0 vertical, e d directly AgAinst undisturbed nd the following M ral fill. We recomme must either be poure be level structu teral loading' ation must outside of the found or the foundation's resistance to la ed f design values be us value Param-eter 0.55 of Friction Coefficient rth pressure 350 P.O.f. passive Ea GO/t"t xom4o City of Edmonds C1.116e, ceruttl CIL) P'diull April 14, 2004 foundation and to be used for design of permanent iing the The values given above a . re or s1,1c)uld be applie(l wllt:�" e safety fact ataining wall$ only. An apprQpdat for overturning and sliding. r ty f ctor of at least 1.5 z ecommend using a safe a walls. We r 0 ssures of any hydrostatic pre not include the effects placed above the 0 The above design values do slo es or loads will be M: ssume that no surcharge P added to the above behind the walls and a ssures should be walls. It these conditions exist, then those pre then we will need ackfill is desired behind the wallS, ovide the Ca if sloping b lateral, pressures. Also he backfill in order to'pr nd slope of t M the wall dimensions a C to be given M a sign earth pressures. 0 appropriate de __40 not be operated behind retaining and 0 C ent should ss the walls are -1 ipm unle Heavy construction equ height of the wall, X M a distance equal to the walls within resulting from the equipment. Placement M z fOUndation JD or the additional lateral pressures lished with hand -operated designed f > ction of retaininq wall bacKfill should be accOMP and compa ca equipment. 0 11 Backf ill n taining Wa Re retaining or foundation wall5 wiLkill I t:41teen 0 8) inches Of al"Y ics. This bacl(fill should contain M M BacKfill plaL;w-d o— ral fill containing no organ les greater th;;n CD ing structu t or clay parti les and have no partic 0 r- should be free-draini c o. 4 sieve should 0 M rcent sil ssing the N C 0) ri five (6) Pe no more tha meter, The percentage of Particles Pa �h silt content, if M (D. ches in dia 0) percent. Due to their hi� M seventy (7 such as Mirati and 0 four (4) in Z -fi - en twenty hp N twe Will, a drainage r ve (25) and omposite, sed as bac 'f aining walls. The drainage composites the native soils are u inst the retc -rne purpose of these X in should be placed aga dation drain system. Enkadra e'hydraulicallY connected to the foun ria for the retaining wall is not should b ts is to assure that the design crite wall. The pj*essure behind the z equiremen ridations backfill r of a build-up Of llykJlu� Structural Fill contains recomme dation exceeded 0ecs"se =arthwork and �:: 11 31 2!.� inri rMsining and foun 6 !on entitled iSenl 1: 1 tural fill beh subsect paction Of struc z nt and re-0 0 rcgarding Pi3c'9m() walls.. M D SLOPES: EXC. WATIoN A r than the limits specified in local. vation slopes be greate uts up to a height Of in no case should exc8 'Temporary C having a 1 government safety regulations. orary cuts, state and nationa steeper than in unsaturated soils may be Velli(;'-11- Furte"I'll? tour �4) feet.deep an four (4) feet, the cut s n. Under hould have an inclination nO Xcavatio height greater th of the slope to the bottom of tho 0 cuts may be O[j(aj:Ve11iUj:jl) (1-6111 the tOP otechnical engineer, excavation (Horiz endations by the ge nqtivP, SOils ;hould be inclined no ific recomm 11 permanent cuts into spec A ied for _jte conditions. modif go/' _AOU_IeM xon'40 `7 city,of F-dmonds d ChloG Coruttli cio Aaron an April 14, 2004 page 6 rtant to I)Ote that hould not exceed 2H.IV. It is imPo Fill slopes s -The contractors should be made aware. 2-1 (H.V)- warning. steeper than ands do C2Vq Suddenly, 3nd. without of this potential hazard, f any temporary Z ontrolled over the top 0 0 t be allowed to flow Unc slopes should be seeded with an -4 0 Water should no tly e posed urficial x stabilitY of the s osion and improve M or permanent slope. All permanen gDecies of vegetation to reduce er appropriate 9 layer Of soil. Cn -1 M R A—T-1 O--N—S: C iE CONSID M 0 base of all footings and retaining walls 0 nUS washed 0 ended at the -inr are recomm hp . h-mi ast six (6) inc, , of one C Footing drains similar ed by at le Supac 4NP, or e surround C Z, M These drains should b xtile filter fabric (Mir3fi 140N, low as Z ped in non -Woven geote 1 pipe invert should be at least as M rock wrap point, the perforated inage, All roof and surface At the highest )e sloped for dra C Z material). hould t of the footing and it S foundation drain system. r --4 the bottOrn te from the kept separa water,drains must be t holes during the fieldwork. 0 -n of the 3 tes ation or_Gurs during -n erved in aw end til(Cly if CXGQV e of 5zibic, he site by us. No groundwater was obs Pot e into the Pl8nned eXGav8t'on 13 drained away from SeePag red should be umping frOrn sumps M M and if encounte winter months, )e French !drains, or by P e excavation. 0 r ditches, 'perforated PIC ches at the bottom Of th 0 M drainage hallow connector tren ected off. C M11 nected by S intercon that surface Water is dir C Cn 3 graded so and in any .-MO -te should b( not be allowed to st Z VVater should o5ed The excav ' ation of the si of slopes. cl. Any exP and away from the tops -e to be constructe Ig in areas the site I or pavements ar gradin tions. slabs) area where foUnda ic to minimize erosion. Final site nt 3way from the buildin 9, ed with plast lockst two (21) Woe to be cover 0 Glopod ot Z slopes diaccnt to buildings should b t to the building is paved where the area adjacen Cn except Z -HWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: 0 G04FERAL EART hould be stripped and cleared Of 811 -1 ient areas 5 erial. The stripped or 5 t M s d building and paven j other deleterious Ma -iouctural till. The propo e used as st all organic matter, ani terials to be tatic surface vege be mixed Witt' any ma is should no rmanent ecl roateria the building, behind pe, rernOV placed ul-idef ieedsto derlying Soils I is defined as any,fill re the un ter e)(CA'JPlion Strur-tural f or in other areas WhC nring And Af tion walls, sitp r ditionq (i on retaining or founda hoUld Ot)sprvp' -rhis engineer s Support loads. to placement of any structufal fill. prior VqdZo: Z I ]WIN. ,ENERAL EARTK114Y1'1r` City of Edmonds c�/o Aoron and Chloe Cerutti April 14, 200.4 Paqe 7 All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optiniujil 11,juisLule content Is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacte d dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and miist he closely controlled during the filling and compactio I n process. Z 0 The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction 0 equipTent, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the M 11fts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Minimum Relative M C rn 0 Compaction 0 0 Beneath footings, slabs or walkways 95%. C M.. M Z Behind retaining walls. 90% 10-1 C > Beneath paveme nts 95% for upper 12 inches of r CAI sub -grade, 90% below that level 0 -n .-n Where: Min imi i rn relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in, percentagics, of X rn M the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in 0 accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1 557-78 (Modified Proctor). r 0 M 0) Use of On -Site Soils M Z 0 r if -grading activities take place during wet weather, orw.hen the sandy, on -site 3613 are extremely wet, site prepa i-atiul I L;usts midy be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granula r fill. The on -site soils are generally sandy Z e not particularly moistiLl Grading operations will be difficult and thus ar re sensitive when the m oisture content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be sus ceptible to excessive softening and. Z pumping" from construction equipment traffic. when the.moisture.con tent is greater than 0 the optimum moisture content. M Ideally, structural fill, which is to Ue plaued in wet weather, should collsist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) perc ent silt or clay particles. The percentage portio, f the soil of particles passing the No. 200 sicvc.should-be measured from that n o passing the three-quarter -inch sieve. 658cl !JOU..jem monqo < VYJ00 so City of Edmonds c/o Aaron and Chloe Cerutti April 14, 2004 Page 8 The use of "some" on -site soils forfill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials ;are segregated and moisture oontentoaro monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: Z No drainage problems were evident with the overall property at 202 7"' Ave. 0 M� Currently, it uppeut�i that any storm water runciff, flows northerly then westerly into Cn III the City of Edmonds storm system present in 7 Ave. M M C If desired, the sandy sub -grade soils will all ow for on -site infiltration. Further M C) 0 -40 0 discussions with City of Edmonds to clarify drainage system. C 'MM CONCRETE: M z 10 All foundation'concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) C z btiall liavie a iiiiiiiinuirii ceineril. coriteW ur 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard or concrete [nix. CD 0 -n A SLOPE SETBACKS BUFFERS: M M As previously stated. the proposed Cerutti residence is understood to be sited in the central portion of the property. 0 0 r M� C M CAI This engineer recommends that no slope dist urbance, cutting, or undermining M 0: occur. z r INSPECTIONS: -4 The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical Z aspects are inspected by this enainepr dWrinq construction: Any soil cuts z 0 Foundation sub -grade verification 0 0 Retaining wall, or rockery place ment M -ment 0 Any fill plac�. Subsurface drainage installation SUMMARY: The proposed Cerutti residence at 202 7"' Ave., Edmonds, Washington is gootechnically viable when constructed in accord, ance with the recomm . en.datin n,. ra Of3ed _jeu*jeM >IonL40 vqaco a L 90 Dennis M. Bruce, RE. M. S. C. E., M. B. A. Geotechnical Civil Engineer December 2, 2005 BUILDING DEC 9 z City of Edmonds Z5 Development Services Department M th 1215 Ave. N - Edmonds, WA 98020 =i fi Subject: "Almost Final" Geotechnical Inspection Report 0 M M 0 Snod a s Now Single -Family Residence g r s 0 __10 0 th ve lob 7 A . N, Edmonds, Washington C. -4 M M z city f Edmonds Plan Check No. 04-W 0 C 2 > This engineering report presents the results of geotechnical ins ections for the p th new single-family residence (for Snodgrass) at 200 7 Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington. ..o -n -n The majority of all geotechnical work has been completed, pending final grading M and final erosion control measures M 00) 0 - M, 0 r REFERENCES: C City of Edmonds approved Project Plans M zo Geotechnical Report dated April 14, 2004 by D. Bruce, P.E. ;0 City:of Edmonds Inspection Agreement for D. Bruce, P.E. Previous Inspection Reports and photographs > z INSPECTIONS: z 0 The most significant geotechnical activities occurred during the spring and early summer 2005 (see previous reports). M This engineer provided periodic inspections of the site throughout summer and fall of 2005 (see photographs). City of Edmonds Inspection Items: Soil cuts: No soil cuts were performed in association with the residence foundation itse If. SOILS FOUNDA TONS S1 TE DE VEZ OPMEN T INSPEC TION DRA INA GE DESIGN & P R T L GA. L P.O. Box 55502 Shoreline, WA 98155 (206) 546-9217 FAX (206) 546-8442 City of Edmonds Re: Mr. Carl Snodgrass December 2, 2005 Page 2 Soil cuts were performed in conjunction with site stabilization rockeries (see photographs). All excavation cuts encountered dense native sands, as anticipated by the Geotechnical Report. 0 All excavation activity work is approved through this date (December 2, 2005). M Foundation Sub -Grade Verification: Previously verified for the residence CO foundations. M, C �Mo The rockery foundation sub -grade was verified to provide a minimum of 2,000 0 C P. s.f. bearing capacity. "OK" to proceed with rockery installation per approved M Plans. M Z 10 '71 Retaining Wall: Previously inspected and approved. co Fill Placement: No foundation fill was required since last report. A nominal o -n amount of crushed rock was imported for use behind the rockery stabilization M .,walls. All fill material placement is approved. M Ch Subsurface Drainage: Previously inspected and verified. 0 0 r M a ch C co NOTE: This engineer inspected and approved subsurface drainage behind the M 0 perimeter rockeries. ;U Rocke!y Placement: This engineer inspected the placement of numerous landscaping and slope stabilization rockeries on the site (see approved Plans and photographs). Cn All base rocks were properly embedded in dense native soils. Rock size, Z 0 linkage, batter and drainage zone'comply with the approved Plans and normal 0 good practices. All rockeries, are approved as constructed. Final Grading and Permanent Erosion Control: It is understood that project owner is working on these activities with completion anticipated "soon". Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer Maech 31, 2005 REC: City of Edmonds Development Services Department APR Z 121 5t' Ave. N 0 Edmonds, WA 98020 PERMIT COUNTER 0 M Subject: Fieid Reports — Geotechnical Inspections Snod rass New Single -Family Residence R 200 7 Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington 0 M C M 0 City of Edmonds Plan Check No. 04-544 0� C This engineering report presents the results of on -site geotechnical inspections M Z th for the new single-family residence (for Snodgrass) at 200.7 Ave. N, Edmonds, C Z Washington These inspections were required as a building permit condition from City > of Edmonds. co 0 _n -n REFERENCES: City of Edmonds approved Project Plans MM 0 Geotechnical Report dated April 14, 2004 by D. Bruce, P.E. OM C co City of Edmonds Inspection Agreement for D. Bruce, P.E. MO Site photographs Z INSPECTIONS: This engineer has worked closely with project contractors (Chuck Warner, G. Z Harris.) with regard to site excavation. Excavation began three weeks ago and encountered dense, sub -grade sands Z with zones of organic material and peat. The organic and peat material is the result of 0. M an historic "lowland bog" on the site. This engineer recommended that two optio ns be considered: 1) utiliz -piles to establish dense deep bearing, or 2) over -excavate e pin unsuitable material and replace with compacted rock. Practical analysis resulted in utilizing the over -excavation technique. Daily site v inspections by this engineer have verified dense, native sands capable of pro, iding 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. SOILS FOUNDATIONS SITEDEVELOPMENT INSPECTION DRAINAGE DESIGN& PERMIT LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 Shoreline, WA 98155 (206) 546-9217 FAX (206) 546-8442 Dennis M. Br Uce, RE. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer June 9, 2005 U11.0 ING City of,Edmonds DEC 9 - Development Services Department Z 0* 121.5t' Ave.* N' 0 Edmonds, WA 98020 M Subject: Field Reports Geotechnicall Inspections ca Snodgrass New Single Residence -Familly a M 200 Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington. C M 0 0 00. City of Edmonds Plan Check No. 04 -544 C -4 3: M M Z ing geotechnical inspections This engineering report presents the results of ongoi 10-1 for the new single-family residence (for Snodgrass) at 200 7th Ave. N, Edmonds, > Z Washington. These inspections were required as a building permit condition from City CI) of.Edmonds. 0 �n -n REFERENCES: MM * Cit of Edmonds approved Project Plans y 0 OM 9 Geotechnical Report dated April 14, 2004 by D. Bruce, P.E. C: M co City of Edmonds Inspection Agreement for D. Bruce, P.E. MO Z Previous Inspection. Reports and photographs ;U INSPECTIONS: Zp This engineer performs ggi!y on -site geotechnical inspections. during the following activities: excavation, foundation sub -grade preparation, foundation 0) placement, any fill placement, subsurface drainage, and any rockery stabilization work. Z 0. At a minimum,, one inspection visit per week is performed. 0 M Soil cuts: As previously stated, localized zones of unsuitable compressible material were encountered. This engineer worked closely with project contractors to optimize removal of unsuitable material and replace with compacted structural fill. This engineer verified that all excavation cuts were stable through this date. (June 9, 2005). Foundation Sub -Grade Verification: As,previously stated, the majority of the site. contains native, dense sands providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. The SO11-S FOUNDA TIONS SITE DEVEI-OPMENT INSPECTION DRAINAGE DESIGN& PERMIT LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 Shoreline, WA 98155 (206) 546-9217 FAX (206) 546-8442 ENGINEERING INI'SECTION FEE RECONCILIATION Permit Fees Collected at Permit Issuance x $50.00, $ o -n # of Inspections: -n ;d Receipt M Receipt Copy Attached: Yes No a: M M, Only required if refund Is due 0 p 0 0 M C Cn 9 CD M 0 Total Inspections Performed Z r- # of Inspections: X $50..00 -4 z Inspection Fees TO BE PAID s ection Fe, n p Conta . ct notified of fees due:, El by phone correction notice given C nta n rec, o ct oti I t i Date Paid: E Receipt #: Collected By: r E] Engineering Notified of Payment Received REFUND Due. Reconciled By: Date 31,2 Original to: El Permit File Copy to. Ej Engineering Admin (refunds only) Revised 3/2/06 z 0 m -i -n Cf) --j r m M 0 0 --Io 0 --j 7- M M Z Cl) 0 -n n ;u --i > af 9, . I; M m 0 M C/) Cl) m Z 71 m r z :1 U). z 0 m