20050463.pdfDATE RECEIVED
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWNER NAMEINAME OF BUSINESS
MIMAF_-L,�O*�
lZ
uj MAILING ADDRESS
0 22-&711 _J�)T
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
bow +
PMONOS7 I I �a (e 1,�2. �
NAME
U
CN
ADDRESS
MW
,=01S.F44rox
S
ZIP TELEPHONE
LPERMITEXPIRES
PERMIT
NUMBER
Jos SU7APT$t
ADORE S�
PLAT NAMEISUBDIVISION KO.
LOT NO.
I
LID No
LID FEE S
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCPApproved 13
Rw Permit Required 0
Street Use Permit Required C3
EXISTING PROPOSED
Inspect.an Required 13
Sidewalk Required 11
13
REQUIRED DEDICATION FT__
U. noargiound
.01111, requited [3
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. 0] Fl T
PRV REQUIRED
�URES
YESM N013
9
REMARKS
OWNERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE
z
DZ '�l A Ar i'5 -I" I d-,,;l I 1 11
Uj
0[ ?,1 ��.
z�_ t I W.,- 11 2,
NAME . I CBL# LAA 4-
klald'!ZJ Kbd. ben q�oL DATE
EERING REVIEWED B
ADDIIESS
�..j H) S,
4SVO L J;2;2
CITY --- FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE UJI
F
T
R
G
E
I IN
R E —
E
I
EV
NEEI
ZIP TELEPH)NE
a" Or -15
Z 71
V I t
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATIOV DATE C17, VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB11 INSPECTION SEPA
REQ'D COMPLETED I EXEMPT
13 YES M'Nol
C # �a
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. CA# _ZA,2�r_ ZONE SIGN AREA HEIGHT
, a
0 01; A-.I-"2- p&-too WAIVER 13 ALLOWED , PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED
STUDY C z 5 0 — 0
STUDY V 0
ElW RESIDENTIAL LOT COVERAGE IRED SETBACKS (FT
NE PLUMBING/MECH. D REOU PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
ALLOWED PROPOSE FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT URSIDE REAR
DDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR 35,7 -2. 47
z 5 X7. �; '6 Z
MIXED USE CHANGE OF USE PARKIN
G LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
REMODEL MULTIFAMILY SIGN REO'D 1OVIDED
REPAIR GRADING CYDS FENCE 7. 1 1 13 577,710
X IFT.) REMARKS
E],-DEMOLISH TANK 1:3 OTHER
GARAGE RETAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER
4j�RPORT ROCKERY FIREALARM
(TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXP AIN
TYPE 0 7SACTION I E
I OCCUPANT
I t/T K-V> I um I (TV111 GROUP
EIR NUMBER OF
lu NUMB
OF DWELLING SPECIAL INSPECTION CONSULTANT OCCUPANT
2,
0 STORIES UNITS LOAD
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE o e-F REQUIRE[) 1:3 YES
Two�
REMARKS
z
DN1_6 Q11,10 t4 (4 (�f GEOTECH REPORT
BY: fhtL L 012L--t.- P6# Zewcj
IWO M NOL ITRUW�Mil
NP BY:
VALOATION
tU 01F.� la
$
Description FEE Description FEE
?6r12 IF Plan Check State Surcharge
HEAT SOURCE LOT SLOPE% STED DATE
" -_ &ff4 0 X Building Permit City Surcharge
PLAN CHECK NO:
Plumbing Base Fee
e47
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO Mechanical
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY. CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBIC
DONMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC,) WILL REQUIRE Grading
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
o: Engr. Review
Lu PERMIT APPLICATION: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(5)
PERMIT LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6)
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION Engr. Inspection /.2
*APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS Fire Review PlanChk.Deposit lop
Uj
_1 IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
Fire Inspection Receipt #
< ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
x FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
0
EDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Total Amt. Due
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR R Landscapeinsp.
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.'
Recording Fee Receipt #
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; T HAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
U N
'TION
IT OF
RU C _
3YED
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknDWedged in space provided
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27.
0 1 LS dIGNURE DATE,,
SIGN R to EWn� DATE SIGNED
04 7711-0220 4RELSED t3y AYE
V It I
'W16N EXT. 1333 '1 � I
ATTEN 1 11,202 /21
IT IS LIN OUSE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI-
FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109 / IBC110 I IRC110.
10104 PRESS HARD - YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES
.. F t: YtLLUWf- lNZ:tlr1tzt, I UP
�=R GOLD - ASSESSOR
z
0
q
0
M
4 -n
M
C
M
0
110
0 C:
rn
M z
C
> z
V)
0 -n
n�
M M
0 F)
0. r-
0 M
C cf)
C C/)
Z
X
X
z
X
W
z
0
M
lz
0 p
N OT Eb
NG
JIS RESPONSIBLE FC12 L. JGINPERH
—091 —511
25 .181
VAO
SURFACES TO
ALL EypoSED
120! 13E COVERED WITHIN 2 DAYS
-4-' 3/4
NORTH PROP. LINE 181'
E3
-c
ELM 10.5,41"
07'-9. �5
1 -- --------------------
EXST.sTAIkS ON GRADE
Lu
i o' 2
LLJ
EXST. ROCKERY
PROPOSED CONC.
CL
V--r- I \&SLAB ,A
ELEV: 100,111.0y" ELEVigg'.5'. 0
WZ.. EXISTING TWO 1.0
RY RESIDENCE
1080SF (IST FLOOR) -K
fA - �MfTAI&Y SP* IOUSF(2NDFLOOR) P go
L LNE,
s
ELIEV: 9914. ELEVi 991.0"
Tri WILE NJ
Tri
114, f Tk
..... .....
EXST. FENCE
SOUTH PROP. LINE 181-4-3/4"
P!
-0 -3 -,rpFiOVED
21 A
24'
Ek CATCH BASIN ON WEST SIDE OF ROAD
USED FOR DATUM POINT
9
741-5" 45'-3" 6
R E e E i v Em
ACCE BLE TIGH
ol MATERI&
APR 1 9 2005
�110 e-EwfA v FAI Nke m6t+ SDR 35
SCH 40
N-12 PERMIT COUNTER
LOT COVERAGE: IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCS. HEIGHT CALCS: F810 HANCOR NORTH
1966 SQ.FT. (13,3%) EXISTING BUILDING ROOF OUTLINE: 10150 sf. (Const. 1974) A=10T-9"
LOT AREA., EXISTING DRIVEWAY: 1790 st (Const, 1974) B=`100'-O" PLOTPLAN APRIL 12, 2005
EXISTING WALKWAY: 60 st (Const, 1974) 0=991-8" CLARK RESIDENCE - ADDITION SCALE: 1" 20'
147810 SQ.FT- D=105'11"
PROPOSED ADDITION: 498 sf.
PROPOSED CONC. SLAB: 225 sf. 22619 95TH PL, W, EDMONDS, WA 98020.
AVE GRADE= 103'-4"
TOTAL EKISTING: 2930 sf
TOTAL PROPOSED: 722 St. ACTUAL=118'-81/2'
MAXIMUM= 103'-4' + 25'-0" =128'41' IL JL
TOTAL EX. + PROPOSED: 36529f. CITY CO""v
7-
RESUB
MAY 19 2005
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
March 16,2005
ect 1343-01
Tff GALLI GROU Proj
Geotechnical Consulting
Z
-4tb
M
Tony Case
C,0
ign and Project Management 3:
Case Des 0 rn
3903 1,. James Street M a
0
Seattle, WA 98122 0
0.
C
M
Subject: Geotechnical Reconnaissance rn
Z
Clark Residence
1h
Place
226.19-95
Edmonds, WA 98020
V5
0 _rI
Dear Tony:
M M
otechnical engineer from The Galli Group visited the above referenced site..
On May 9, 2005, a ge ast side of
ated'on the E .0
to evaluate the existing foundation and soil conditions. The site is loc 80 per�e I nt r
0 M
th pl e w. at th toe of a slope that ascends to the North at an inclination of about C
95 ac e e of our site Cn
20 feet before flattening out again. The purpos K.Cn
for a total vertical distance of about an addition on the M 0`
on the existing slope from constructing Z r-
visit was to evaluate the influence
os d addition
tectural site plan, prop e
sidence. As shown archi
southeastern end of the existing re
from the toe of the steep slope.
ituated about 20 horizontal feet away
will be s
X:
>
Z
ons
-south
slope of a draw that traverses a north X
-facing
The existing house is situated on the south
site is likely underlain by glacial till CD
nidge. Geologic maps of the area indicate that the
trending Edmonds East and part of the Edmonds West Z
0
and Advance Outwash (Geologic Map ofthe I
consists of unsorted
Washington, James P. Minard, 1983). Glacial till generally .0
Quadrangles, e advancing M
ed" over the topography in front of th
mixtures of silt, clay, sand and gravel� "smear cial till tends
uently compacted by tons of ice. Gla
glacier thousands of years ago. It was subseq
ertical relief. When disturbed by
to appear very dense, and can stand unsupported in near-v
e unworkable.
moisture and traffic it can becorn
nerally consists of glaciofluvial deposits of pebbly gravel and sand
Advance outwash ge g ice. The risk of erosion is
rridden by the advancin
deposited in front of the glacier and then ove the glacial till depo it. Advance
s
ash deposits than in
in the granular advance outw
greater
(206) 546-89ol Fax (206) 542-7625
w.R Nnrth 201 Lane, Seattle, Washington 98133 Phone
Clark Residence 22619 951h Place W.,
May 11, 2005
outwash generally appear s stable when undisturbed and can stand in slopes approaching 100
percent if groundwater or surface water runoff is not present.
I in shallow excavations for the
Wewalked the property and noticed evidence of sandy grave gravel as also evident in open
exposed on the slope. Sand and w
soil was
fence, as well as where similar to advance
trenches being excavate d on, 95h Place. The observed soil appears more
or below the contact
outwash than glacial till, indicating that the site is likely situated near
between th e glacial till and the advance -outwash.
on the site. Mature Douglas Fir trees
We did not observe any indications of slope movement surfic I ial runoff is not directed
was evident
M.
-49
e id nce of sur.ficial �crosion
dotted the slope and no v e
toward the top of the slope from the property north of the.site. No evidence of groundwater
and timber wall a peared
p
55
seepage was observed during ou r site visit. The existing basement wall
to be functioning without distress We observed no evidence of foundation settlement or
M
C: 0
M
cracking d uring our visit.
__40
0
0 C
M,
ns
Conclusi the existing slope appears stable in its current
Based upon our geotechnical reconnaissance,
improvements w ill not advers ely impact the slope or slope system.
M Z
10 71
C
> z
-4
condition. The proposed site not adversely
Planned excavations consist of shallow excavations for spread footings. These will
E:
Vi
affect the existing slop e or neighboring properties.
0 -n
n.�
The prop osed. addition will be situated about ten feet from the toe of a small portion of the slope
the steep slope (inclined at'about
ic
M M
(i lined at about 30 percent), and about 30 feet from the to e of
nc nt to avoid risk to the current slope
sh own in attached site plan). This is sufficie
0 r
0 M
80 percent as 10 feet of the toe
stability. We recommend restricting excavatio n on the steep -slope and within
minor soil disturbance.
C CO
M 0
of the steep slope exc ept for repair of fencingand similar
Z
om points of
Site soils are subject to severe erosion potential if left unprotected, particularly fr venng
We co
;a
en excavations. recommend
concentrated discharge, or side slopes from op r, and revegetating the exposed soils
with sheeti ng during inclement weathe
stockpiled soil plastic wnhill side of the
once con struction is complete. A silt fence should be erected on the do
3:
grat diment off site.
disturbed soil areas to prevent mi ion of se
5i
z
ial Services
based upon observations of surficial soil conditions encountered
0
ndations are
The above recomme e. if conditions are encountered during
in our research and limited site reconnaissanc
from those anticipated we shoul d be advised so that we can
tion that vary significantly
construc ty of the
revise our recommendations if n ecessary. This report is not intended as a warr. an
with the state of
erformed in general conformance
subsurface conditions. The above work was p f Washington within the limited scope of
the state o
p ractice for geotechnical engineering within
work for this project.
The Galli Group
2 of 3
13521trrpt
P
clark Residence - 22619:- 950' PI ace W.-
May 11, 2005
Please do not hesitate to call if you have questions regarding this report
Sincerely,
ZOL
T ALL
Z,
M
29 9
Paul L. Stoltenbe rg, P.E.
C -1
Project Geotechnical E ngineer
0 rn.
Attached: Figure 1: Vicinity MAP
Site.Plan duced scale)
Portion Of (re
.�C
:m 01
0:
0C.
Figure:2:
M
M Z
z
_4
Om.
n
m m
''0
0
C, COO
m a
z
M
rJ
z
0
J
3 of 3
The Galli Group
13521trmt
vvvu
�z 1 9000 121. MTH PL Sf I
0 Sw M
IM S1 Sw
T 22 ! "TH M, � a! ST 230TH
229M `lea! I I 23D
LSW k,
ST SW
Sw b 231ST ST
IST Sw 8D111
L
23200 1 231 ho Pi. HMLY LN
-j ST W Sw —am- PL 91)
Q. ST Sw
5 ROBI 232ND 0 233RD 14AP LE
.1M L SW: pL 9j) PL
06 FMAR WOODWY 39 234TH
HS P 2�ATH Sw LN
10900 2M PL <
Flu 11 1"Or" 1 AUK A FULZ COO I F1
1235TH PL SW H S Sw �S
Sr Sw
2 T
PL SW
236,1
PL
FE .1 MP a
Q.
G
F FIGURE
95th pl, Edmonds, 98020, page & Grid 474 H1 CLARK RESIDENC.E
r+ Clark Residence: 22619 W
3HI JO AinvnO 3HI oi 3na si ii
301ION SIHI NVH1 NVMO SS31 S1 MYNA SIHI N1 IN3vyn000 3H.L :11 :30110N. .
MAYES TESTING ENGINEERSj INC.
Everett Office
917-134th Street SW
Suite A-1
Everett, WA 98204
ph 425.742.9360
fax 425.745.1737
IVITE No.: E5315
Tacoma Office
Project: CLARK RESIDENCE
10029 S. Tacoma Way
Address: 22619 95th Place W, Edmonds, WA
Suite E-2
Tacoma, WA 98499
Permit No.: 2005-0463 (City of E dmonds)
ph 253.584.3720
tax 253.584.3707
Owner: Clark Residence
Portland Office
7911 NE 33rd Drive
Architect: Case Des.ign.
Suite 190
En gineer: Sliderule
Portland, OR 97211
Z.
Contractor: Haider Construction
ph 503.281.7515
fax 503.281.7579
Page 1
Date: .7/20/05
-5�
Weather: Sunny
. .
Cl) X
0
inspection: I<wik Bolt
M
C
M
Sample(s): N/A
0
0 C
Observed installation of Red Head,Kwik Bolts (expansion anchors), embedded 7" into
existing
concrete, for use as both anchor bolts and hold-downs. Hold-down emb edment of 7"
instead of
M M.
z
12" as plans read, was approved via phone call by the architect to structural engineer, Mike
Bledsoe (Sliderule). Al I per letter -from structural engineer dated 7-13-05.
>
F_ -4
To the best of our knowledge, items inspected this date are in accordance with approved plans
0 -n
and specifications.
n�
INSPECTOR: Lisa Pyper
01—
.0 M
C
M
:Z0
z
:C
z
0
.0
M
00e
1`7
REVIEWE D BY: irle, P.E.
E-MAILED
Timothy G.&ckL
cc: Chris Sawall-Haider Construction; Bldg Dept -City of Edmonds
Height Calculation Worksheet
K
Date
Permit Number cNDS 04
Address
Inspector M-'�>.
0
Average Grade._j L
Max Height (25'+Ave.) �)S, 93
IC)
CO
Actual Height (A+B +C)
0
0:
M
:d: M z
CO)
.0,
-n g)
J. (A.
M M.
0
-3
=(C '3.
M 0..
z
74
d
Z
z
0.
M
Elevation of transit above Datum (B).
Datum Elevation (A)
1/temp/biiildiilg/foniis/lieight worksheet
FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM
TO:
DATE:
MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION
FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE
—7 GN
ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE
PLEASESIGN
z
0
DIVISION.DATE
0
-PLANNING
PLEASESIGN
M
PROJECT A2a
=n
Cn
SITE ADDRESS
0 M
C 0
M
B# DATE INSPECTED
0
80
C
PERMIT
M
M Z
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED
C
> z
r
A* field inspection was conducted to determine: compliance with -approved plans. Final approval
2;
CD
denotes that there are no ob ections from the above signed Department to tile release of
0 -n
PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of
M M
C/)
....................................................
GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
0 r- . .
0M
CC/)
9 C/)
M
Z
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
z
0 Copy of CONDITIONSgiven to owner/contractor by inspector
z
0
-FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES
M
El Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inpector.
2.
3.
RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date Signature
1:temp:b1dg:fon-ns:ocaprv1 3/25/04
Only required it refund is due Cn
0
r
0 m
C (D
M
Total Inspec.doils Performed Z
0.00 $
# of Inspections: X $5
>
hispection Fees TO BE PAID 7, 7
In no cc given]
Contact notified of fees due: El by phone El rection. notice given
9-90 �—rectil
Date Paid:..
Receipt
ly.
Collected By:
Engineering Notified of Pa t Received
7
F Due:
m
c,
Reconciled By: Date
Original: to: :E:] Pert4it File Copy to: Ej Engineering Admin (refunds only)
Revised 3/2/06