The URL can be used to link to this page

20060043.pdfiiiiiii[ , DATE RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAM INANE OF BUSINESS 1 �) CITY �ILEIIIIE , — &';e L,f Z) h 6AV) _1V;vI.i 14�_ 1.1 NAMEO\ UCLI 7171E-8S3 LQ lu CONN* 4vt CITY EIPIRATI�JDATE JX 2 1 -7 MT L h rl NEW ADDITION REMODEL REPAIR DEMOLISH =R1 (TYPE OF USE. BU NUMBER OF STOR FPERMIT EXPIRES NUMBER joB SUITEtAPTV ADDRESS cecl aA PLAT NAMUSUBDIVISION NO. LID 0 LOT NO 1 47— LID FEE S C T ED OFFICIAL STREET MAP 1EBCn4P0d R. Pe EXISTING — PROPOSED REQUIRED DEDICATION FT METER SIZE I LINE OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES 0 No 0 REMARKS OWNEFUCONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONFROUDIRANAGE FIRE R VIEWED By VARIANCE OR CU 1HO11LINEORADB# I INSPECTION SERA z R ' 0.1 C-PL—C I .—T 0 YE C! NO CAV 05-111 ZONE SIGN ARPERA HEIGHT WAIVER 13 orDee. I ALL.!!E. P—L— -001 — —VII "L/ STUDY Er lf;� 1> 11 W I I i RESIDENTIAL I I'S PLUMBING I MECH C OVERAGE OWE. PROPOSED IREDSETO CK (FT,) I R"U S PROPO EDSETBACKS(FT.) RSI �R SI FR E REAR 0 COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE 0 LLOT AL FR NT SIDE REAR X E3 HAN OF US'E' C GE 3,41A I z.. T. 0 C: M MIXED �USE PARKINGY'... PLANNING REVIEWED 8 LOTAREA LANNR,G REVIEWED 8 DATE M E] MULTIFAMILY SIGN REDD PRO _,L, 0 -40 2— 1 3 (Pool 1 19 1 ok 0C M eyes FENCE X REMAR%� �.j yi r. 14DVSC WAt S H%a C�M "" l)30 — eAA" M [3 TANK OTHER In z o RETAINING WALL ROCKERY [3 F:RE SEE INKLER FREALARM Sf#%,vA fit LU,4 dwt.: to DWELLING UNITS ", N4, AAet�hin,, TYPE OF�JXUCTION AAwl, 4 r� 414Y GOC R 6t !Tla3- - 0) 0 IT SPECIAL INSPECTION CONSULTANT OCCUPANT 13 LOAD REQUIRED YES 3:9 M M w Cj) 0, 0 M VA REMARKS GEO ECHREPORT BY: C U) MO STE BY, u5=i5t.?N At, VALUATION o twet: 6lillvo ro-p-o 4 ii, Description FEE Description FEE > z vaAll, 1-1,4rH Plan Check �zlq Slate Surcharge HEAT SOURCE LOT SLOPE% VEST...", 7 47. Building Permit - , City Surcharge z PLAN CHECK NO: Plumbing Base Fee 0 mechanical 0 IT! THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY C NSTRUCTION ON THE PUBIC 00 NMAIN ICURSS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE 5 Grading BE - PARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT APPLICATION: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(S) Engr. RevieVv Engr. Inspection I' PERMIT L MIT, SEE ECDC 19.00.0051AI(6) or SEEBACK PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION A a 'APPLICANT. ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS Fire ReVIew Plan Chk. Deposit 7757 IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF OFFICIALS, ANY AND EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES or WHATEVER NAIWRE� ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY Fins Inspection Receipt It FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO 2DIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE L.ndscapelnsp, TotalAmt.Due NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.- Fee Receipt # 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE ReAD THIS APPLICATION: THAT THE INFORMATION .2ecording APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF Thie Pol—a- �- d-a - P-1-11 dend sgnRd ey In. THE OWNER I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL Bundndq Offival or hKJh,1 Deplfty� and Fees are add, and TION;ANOV1)0,OiNG THE NOR AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED T' VIC" HE NOR IN E LADD ODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION 1111pt IS Ck,oaI,dg,d,n,p ... peovdad. WORK EN'S OM =RANCE AND RCW 18 27. �;�. P E�S OFFICIALS SIGNATURE SION�� (425) 771-0220 —RELEA ATTENTION EXT. 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL r A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI- FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED, UBC1091 IBC110 I IRC110. N . CY, GOLD - ASSESSCOTIG 10104 PRESS HARD - YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES am CIT C 1OHN BMW" ADJACENT AUZY ORNMY �l +150 +160 + p"pW UNK Uft Ora ILA= + - >I cl "..,W L - �E �'f LU m Ills Z.. 64 SM TIC PROPOSED OEM mon -APPRk"' BY "NGINEERING slim rf PROPOSED ADDMON Date._ us iONER/CONTRACTOR PLO" sit v I'S RESPONSIBLE > ..0 +146 3-T-W FOR EROSION CONTROL AND DAMA4E vww "m oww" W&L C-1 -< vim Am w" "cc v awmw LOW lmv am" mu FOOTING DRAINI NOT ff: it MOW = Im ,== TO BE TIED INTO "r, < .301 -0. Wo Romm DETENTION SYSTEK so~ 0 fm cum mm 9 Now WAL AW4"e- 9 WN www"" 4-Clow off"m 1 1, am rem nu OWN ftm c am =:mft- ompm UK N t4c, ccy" Sides t Aiilh� AUU.1 RESUM DEC i�"2'0"'Oi' ""J- Gt�TERS/DOWNSPOUTS ceadA 5i tic, Rear- ,,LIN& DEPAR -rMENT TO CONNECT TO EXIST. SYST. 7,5' glTy OF EDMONDS 0 oko design 3 Lm ADO" W" No ww ma m "a tftrft VOW FAWLY %MOM SMUC%ft Lm OWVM no Sr (rk"No / m V (L" $0 wr omexw MMAIMs SMW OF R04MM WM PERMIT DRAVONGS6 NOT FOR CONSTR zom" 0-6 BUILDING RELGHT-P.&&ULAM I* PW z 0 0 MAX IWAL M.? *AMU PA09 40.7/4 1640 c a IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CAi CULATIONS m -400 1. 1315 SF "10 7. 1641 0 C AM "" TO 4my 19"1 MZ 2. ito V ADW"OW IMPVtOM SWACC AKA 0-4 GRADINg CALCULATIO 30 OY 04 OY .0 0 -n 9 KDAVOW MR NCN FOOTOW1 auwnm Sj��Aff%*Cg SWU K At OWND MMXr#M SURRIDGE m M Sl I rRESIDENCE a ra LOWEST FOOTINQ ELEVATIO REN OV� —)N .0 0 M 0 AVERAGE LOT SLOPE X 6 DRIVEWAY SLOP 3DR—ROWE. MENCE 4 OCOM PROPERTY OWNE 49FF AM VAl WANK z ; ww L STREET ADDRESS PLOT PLAN 0 m MOM MR IN wo NUMBF POW Wok PH TAX ACCQUI`4T PARCEL pow AV* PH 0014L NUMKOh 004845-Mi-01-40 VPm Dow" IN PAM ol 11mial moom at x M MAW% WO ow i LEGAL DESCRIPTION KLLOW MAT or omm" Wi 0-00 - Lm I mllf'"ll '117 RA MUM PLAT Of tomo" December 5, 2005 RESUB Brandon Hamilton DEC 2 0 2005 (i R 701 Cedar Street co BUILDING DEPARTMENT Edmonds, Washington 98020 CITY OF EDMONDS RE: CRITICAL AREAS SITE RECONNAISSANCE z 701 CEDAR STREET EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Hamilton: '49i Landau Associates completed a critical areas site reconnaissance for the property located at 701 Vi -4 X t, Cedar Street (subject property) in the City of Edmonds, Washington (City). A residence on the property ITI and an associated driveway lie approximately 10 to 40 ft, respectively, from an unnamed stream. This 0 0 C [,�� stream originates from a spring that is located to the east on a neighboring property. This letter report C , ITI summarizes our findings of the site reconnaissance and provides technical information required by the z Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) for critical areas, adopte e ruary r- Before the site reconnaissance, Landau Associates biologists reviewed information from readily available public domain resources. This information was used to gain a general understanding of 0 -n -n potential critical areas issues on and near the project site. These resources included the Catalog of M M Washington Streams and Salmon UtilizatiO17, P"get Sound (Williams et al. 1975), the Digital Coastal 0 0 Alias [Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) 20051, City of Edmonds' critical areas C inventory maps (City of Edmonds 2005), and approp riate ECDC sections pertaining to streams and ITI 0 z r- P critical areas (ECDC 2005). ;a After completing the data -gathering task, a biologist from Landau Associates conducted a site reconnaissance on September 23, 2005, to document the existing site conditions. z REsuLTs OF INFORMATION REVIEW AND SITE RECONNAISSANCE z 'file Catalog qfWashinglon Streams and Salmon Utilization, Puget Sound does not mention this IT unnamed spring or stream. Ecology's Digital Coastal Atlas also does not show the spring, stream, or any other environmental concerns on or around the subject property. The City of Edmonds' critical areas inventory maps indicate that the subject property is within an erosion hazard area. The site reconnaissance included visual observations ofadjacent properties and interviews with adjacent property owners. From this effort, it was determined an unnamed spring surfaces east of the ENVIRONMENTAL I GEOTECHNiCAL I NATURAL RESOURCES 130 2nd Avenue South - EdMonds, WA 98020 - (425) 778-0907 - fm (425) 778-6409 �.)MdolflhOM SEATTLE - SPOKANE - TACOMA PORTLAND subject property along tile north side of 711 Cedar Street. The property owner it 711 Cedar Street has created a pond (without a recirculating pump system) to control the flow ofthe spring before it leaves his property to tile west and enters the subject property at 701 Cedar Street. Once oil the subject property, tile small stream flows toward the west approximately 40 ft through a defined channel. At tile west side of tile property boundary, the stream enters a below -ground culvert and finally into a series ofcatch basins. Both ornamental and invasive plant species are present near the strearnbank, including common horsetail (Equisetian arvense), rhododendron (Rhododendron sp.), evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniants), bracken fern (Pleridium aquilinian), swordfern (Potvaichion muninan), morning glory z (Convolvidus arvensis). Several other grass and tree species were observed in the northeastern portion of the subject property, where tile stream eaters tile site. Mowed grass is present oil the remaining streanibank oil the property. Within the stream channel itself, vegetation is limited to common horsetail, common velvetgrass (Holcus lanatus), watercress (Rorippa and birdsfoot tre f0i I In C (Lotus corniculatus). M 'F� "k, EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. M M z jo Section 23,90.010 ofthe ECDC, adopted February 2005, defines four types of streams in Edmonds, C Z > as follows: 0) 0 -n "Streains shall be classffied in accordance with the Washington Department of Natural Resources water typing sYsten? (WAC 222-16-0 30) hemb), adopted in its entirety M M by reference andsunnnarized as,follows: ra a. Type S: streanis inventoried as 'shOl-elineS ofthe state' under Chapter 90.58 0 r- 0 M RCW and the rules, proinulgatea(pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW,� C (1) b. 1�pe F.- streanis which containfish habitat; C co M 0 c. Type Np: perennial nonfish habitat streams; and J Type Ns: seasonal nonfish habitat streams. X All streams included on the inventory that are known to exist within the City of Echnonds do not nieet criteriafor 'shorelines qf1he state' but containfish habitat and, z thus, ineet designation criteria for Type F waters pia-sliaof to WAC 222-16-030. �r However, not all Ednionds streams support anadroinousfish populations oi- have the CA Potentialfor onadroinous./ish occurrence because qfobstructions, blockages or access z reso,ictions 1,esultingfi-oin existing conditions, Therq)bl-e, in order to pi-ovide special 9 -eased protectionfior anodroinous sh i h app ication of consideration qfand inci fir 17 1 e I 0 M -els, Echnonds streams shall be f -thr c a sffied asfollows: dcvelopinent standai, In C I s Anadroinous firshbearing streams: stivanis existing in whole 01- in part within the Chy qfEdinonds in which anadroinousfish are known to occur, As q/`2004, Edinonds fishbearing streams are known to include Willou, Creek, 'Shellabarger Creek, Shell Creek, I-Iindlcy Creek, Perrinville, Creek, and Lunds Creek; and Nonanadrontousfishbearing streams: streams existing in whole oi- in parl within the City qfEchnonds which do not suppoi-Ifish populations and do not have the polenlial fbi-fish occurrence because qfbarricrs tofish passage or lack q1'suitable habitart. 12105105 S:Pr0jee1s%92M001T!16Rar�RW0i Cedar Critleal Areas Rerer-RaTI 2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES Streams with anadromousfish occurrence irere ideniffied in the Echnonds Streatin Inventoi- .1� anclAssessment, a 2002 report qfPentec Environmental which is incorl3orated -qA -c -ein sel.f -1h. by this i n nce as f'hei oi Section 23.90.040 of the ECDC describes standard stream buffer widths as follows: "The fbIlowing shall be the slanclarel bi&r wicIths.for streanis based upon the Washington State Department of' Natural Resoi irces irater lypiniz sjsleni andfin-ther classification basect uponfish presence (fishbearing vs. noqf!shbcarhkq).for the Type F streams existing in the Cily ofEchnonds: a. Type S.- 150fieet; b. T),pe F anactronious fislibearing stream acfacent to reaches with anadroinous fish access: 100feet; c. Type F anadronious fishbearing streani adjacent to reaches without anath-owousfish access: 75feet; cl, Type F no)7aiiacii-oinoits,li.yhbeoi-iiig stream: 75ftet; e. Type Np: 50ficet; �f Type Ns.- 25,feet. Based oil the information collected during our background review and site reconnaissance, we have concluded that tile unnamed spring and stream would be classified Type Np — perennial nonfish habitat stream. Although the surface water produces a defined channel, which demonstrates evidence of water passage, tile portion of the stream that originates from the spring at 711 Cedar Street and flows west through the subject property, where it enters a series ofcatch basins, does not contain any resident trout or anadromous sainion because of the presence of impassable fish barriers. Based oil this stream rating, a 50-fir buffer from the ordinary high water mark ofthis stream would be required oil the subject property. STREAM MITIGATION The ECDC allows for a reduction of the buffer of up to 50 percent, provided that a stream buffer enhancement conclusively demonstrates that enhancement of the stream buffer will not degrade the value ofthe buffer area in terms offish, stream, and wildlife protection. Stream buffer enhancement plans must meet the specific requirements of ECDC 23.40.110, 23.40.120, 23.40.130, and 23.90.040 D 2a-d. The ECDC also allows for streani buffer averaging, pursuant to ECDC 23.90.040 D 3. A list of native shrub species is provided in Table I so that future homeowners call plant tile buffer with appropriate species. According to the ECDC, shrubs Should be planted at a density of no less than 3 ft on center, trees should be planted it no less than 8ft oil center. Planting additional shrub and tree species will increase the habitat functions or the buffer. All ofthe listed species below occur frequently in wetland buffers throughout the area. These species have been chosen not only for their ability to 12105105 S:Nj.d�%25=11R.WM701 C.d.1 Clfi�d P— R—lUIrIP1 3 LANDAu AssOCIATES z 0 M M 0 80 C M z om "n X M M C M Z X z z 0 tolerate tire site conditions, but also for their ability to provide wildlife forage, habitat, and aesthetic appeal. TABLE I BUFFER PLANT SPECIES Scientific Name Common Name Notes Mahonla nervose Oregon grape Likes dry sites, such as the upper portion of the buffer Comus stolonitera red -osier dogwood Probably suitable for lower buffer area only Gaultheria shaflon sal.1 Holodiscus discolor oceanspray Likes dry open sites Lonicera involucrale Black twinberry Prefers moist soils Oemlefia cerasiformis Indian plum Also could be located in lower area with S. racemose Philadelphus fewisff mock -orange Tolerates dry soils; flowering shrub, very fragrant Ribes sanguineum red -flowering currant Likes dry soils, forest edge; pink flowers in spring Rubus parviflorus, thimbleberry Open forests, drier soils Rubus spectabilis salmonbeTry Prefers moist soils Rhamnus purchiana cascara Does well in the shade; does well In fairly dry areas Salix scoulefiana Scouter willow Upland and wetiand; a better choice than S. sitchensis Salix sitchensis Sitka willow Common and tolerant, however can invade streambanks Sambucus, racemosa red elderberry Rapid grower; will tolerate sun and shade Sorbus scapulina Western mountain ash ...... . ... - Tile proposed trees and shrubs would provide greater species variety over existing conditions in this area, replacing tile grass ground cover. Shrubs and trees should be planted in the early spring or late fall and the new plantings are to be watered regularly during the first three growing seasons after installation. To belp establish the planted trees through the summer months (June -September), a ternporary irrigation systena will need to be installed. The irrigation systern needs only to be a drip title, above -ground systern. Periodic visual inspection ofthe trees following planting will help determine ifthe flow of tile drip system is providing enough water. Wilted or burned -looking leaves and needles are ail obvious sign that the flow needs to be increased. Tile planted buffer area will need to be maintained for a rninfirturn of three years, Any plant specimen that fails to thrive in the buffer area and dies must be replaced,with the sarne species or ail approved species of tree or shrub. As long as the specified plants are Used, shrubs are planted in the early spring or late fill, any blackberry or other invasive plant species is cut back at least twice a year for a minimum of three years, and the new plaritings are watered regularly during the first three growing seasons after installation, shrub and tree plantings within the buffer are expected to be successful. GEOLOGICAll HAZARDOUS AREAS Geologically hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, landslides, earthquakes, or other geological events. The house oil tile subject property is situated approximately 10 ft below the grade of Cedar Street. The slope from Cedar Street at tile south end of the property creates a steep slope 12fOSM5 &P11j1111M5%Q0nR0RMM70i Cldw C(dicli 41a, R—q-1Wpt LANDAU ASSOCIATES 4 z 9 0 M --I "n M C: M 0 -40 0 C:: -4 M I M C: z o"n M M 0 0 0 C: ca X (n M C) Z 7-1 z —1 z 9 0 M N along the northern, eastern, and southern portion of tile site. These slopes have been established by a -ea of available soil has become system of retaining walls, leaving minimal soils exposed. The small ta established with a combination of ornamental and invasive species, such as English ivy (Hedera helix), evergreen blackberry, bracken fern, swordfern, rhododendron species, azalea (Rhododendron sp), and rose (Rosasp.). During the planning and construction process, alteration of tile retaining wall and vegetation should be avoided. lfvegetation is grubbed and removed, it should be replanted to avoid erosion. Also, -eport would be required, per ECDC if the retaining wall is to be altered, a detailed special study i 23,80.050. According to the ECDC 23.80.050 G, report requirements for stable erosion hazard areas and additional procedures to limit erosion and excess sedimentation are as follows: "At the directors discretion, detailed critical areas report requircinents may be waived for erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability. Report requiremenisfilr stable _,osion hazard areas inay be inet through construction documents that shall include at a mininnon an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with requirements seffiorth ill Chapter 18.30 ECDC UsE OF Tnis REPORT This report was prepared for tile exclusive use of AKA Design for specific application to this prqJect. The use by others, or for purposes other than intended, is at the user's sole risk, The findings presented herein are based oil our understanding ofthe 701 Cedar Street site, tile City of Edmonds critical areas regulations, and site conditions observed during the September 23, 2005, site reconnaissance. This study included investigation of tile potential critical areas, as requested in tile City Municipal Code, passed May 17, 2005. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, the findings presented in this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted sensitive area investigation principles and practices in this locality at the time this letter report was prepared. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. Stream ratings and buffer widths recommended by Landau Associates are considered preliminary until verified by City personnel. I 121MOS S:N.jWM925WDlWU-R-n70i C�d�l Nfl.1 A,— R ttrpt 5 LANDAu AsSOCIATES Landau Associates appreciates the opportunity.to assist, you with this project. 11' you decide to develop the prolm -ty. we can prepare the required hurrer enhancement plan and assist you with other aspects ol'the project as well. Ifany questions arise regarding this letter reporL please call its at 425-778- 0907. LANDAU ASSOCIATES. INC. z 0 -4 0 ta, Shannon Moore Project Environmental Scienti,�t M m m m m z Staff Scientkt C z f SEM/MD�1dr Ica 0 "n m M V; 0 0 m C ca M 0 z Z Z M s C.ft on't"I R..11111V LANDAu AssociATes 6 REFERENCES ECDC. 2005. City qf Edmonds, Washington Municipal Code. Available at httP:Hsearch.mrsc.orjz/ iixUgateway.dii/ediiidmc?f�-tenii)lates&fii=edindpage.litiii id=rnunicodcs:Edmonds. Edmonds b, Community Development Code. Accessed on September 23. Ecology. 2005. Department of Ecology Washington Coastal Atlas. Available at http://www. ecy.wa.f_,ov/programs/sea/siiia/atias home.html. Washington State Department of Ecology. Accessedon September 23. Edmonds, City of. 2005. Edmonds Community Plan Update. Available at litti)://www.ei.edmotids.wa.tis z CityDet)artinotits/PlaiiiiiiigDept/coundate drafts.htm CityofEdmonds. Accessed on September 23. 0 Williams, R.W., R.M. Laram ie, and J.J. Ames. 19'75 A Catalog of Washington So-eanis and Sahnon Utilization - Volume 1: Puget Sol' nd Region. Washington Department of Fisheries. November. M rn C M -4 0 C --4 C x m M Z C: > 0 -TI M m 0 0 M M M z z M 1=5105 S:ProjectaW5%DDIWj1,Rm1Ri70I Cedar Ciakasl Naas Rasenjept LANDAU ASSOCIATES 7 7777�� GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 124 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771�0221 Webwte! Vuedmonft.�a,S DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning Building - Engineering August 25, 2006 z 0 Mr. Jeff& Tami Surridge 0 Post Office Box 553 Lynnwood, Washington 98046 =5 RE: 701 Cedar Street, Building Permit #2006-0043 Vi X M C: in Dear Mr. & Mrs. Suffidge, 0 Thank you for meeting with City staff members this week regarding your survey of the east M M z setback on the house you own at 701 Cedar Street in Edmonds. The survey concludes, as you z are aware, that the east minimum side yard setback of five feet for the addition is not maintained. Note the City still requires that you submit a copy of this or, a More current, survey. :� vi The purpose of this letter is to confirm that Senior Planner Meg Gruwell provided you options 0 _11 _n for resolving this matter including but -not limited to: obtaining a variance, (although as Mrs. M M Gruwell explained, meeting the criteria is very difficult), removing the encroaching sections of building such that the minimum required setback distance of the addition is met or, obtaining a 0, 0 lot line adjustment that shows compliance to minimum required setbacks for the addition, (you C C 0) should confirm with Mrs. Gruwell whether or not the original non -conforming house must also in 0 r be included in the lot line adjustment). Be advised, occupancy of the structure shall not be granted until this matter is resolved, Illegal occupation prior to resolution is a violation of International Residential Building Code Sections z 109 and 110 and is subject to misdemeanor penalties as outlined in Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter (ECDC) 19.85 as well as civil penalties of ECDC Chapter 20. 110 which allows fines to be assessed at the rate of $100.00 per day. z 0 4 Lastly, please be advised continued work you perform on the home (under the current building 0 in permit) is completely at your own risk until this matter is resolved. Sincerely, [c, Jeannine %raf Building Official Cc: Meg Gruwell, Senior Planner incorporated August 11, 1890 Swart Office MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 917,134th Street SW Suit A- 8 WA 98204 EVereft In 425�742.9360 to. 425.745.1737 MTE No.: E6068 Tacoma Office Project: 701 CEDAR STREET 10029 S. Tacoma Way Address: 701 Cedar Street, Edmonds, WA Suite E-2 Permit No.: 2006-0043 (City of Edmonds) Tacoma, WA 98499 ph 253.584.3720 tax 253.584.3707 Owner: JTS Property Solutions Portland Office Architect: AKA Design 7911 NE 33rd DrWe Suite 190 Engineer: W. A. Dame Portland, OR 97211 Contractor: Quality Improvement ph 503.281,7515 Page 1 fax 503,281.7579 Date: 3123106 Weather: Part Cloudy, 601F Inspection: Epoxy rebar Sample(s): N/A Onsite for inspection of epoxy grouted rebar. The contractor installed #4 dowels into existing concrete on the north side of the house on both the east and west walls. The contractor drill 5/8" dia. holes 5" deep and cleaned each prior to filling with Simpson SET pack epoxy per manufacturer's instructions. The contractor also drilled and epoxy grouted holes for wall dowels extending up from the new footing located between the existing house and the new garage area. The same bar size and hole diameter was used. NOTE: Simpson epoxy was used, Hilti HY1 50 was specified in the structural general notes. Approval from engineer -of -record is required. Preliminary Inspection Pending EOR approval of epoxy. INSPECTOR: Lonny Morrison REVIEWED BY: Timothy WBeckerle, P.E. cc: Jeff Surridge — JTS Property Solutions; Bldg Dept — City of Edmonds Z 9 0 m :; 9i T�, Evereft Office MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC 917-134 It Street SW Suite A.t11 Everett WA 98204 ph 425:742.9360 lax 425.745.1737 MTE No.: E6068 Tacoma Office Project: 701 CEDAR STREET 10029 S. Tacoma Way Suite E-2 Address: 701 Cedar Street, Edmonds, WA Tacoma, WA 9B499 Permit No.: 2006-0043 (City of Edmonds) ph 253.584.3720 fax 253.584.3707 Owner: JTS Property Solutions Portland Office 7911 NE 33,d DINe Architect: AKA Design Suite M Engineer: W. A. Dame Portland, OR 97211 z Contractor: Quality Improvement ph 503. 281.7515 fax 503.281.7579 Page 2 Date: 4/3/06 Weather: Overcast a M Inspection: SM Grout C 0 Sample(s): (3) 4x4x8 grout, (3) 8x8x16 CMU prisms -10 0 C: Inspected the reinforcing steel and the grouted cells at the following buildi ng grids: A/2-3.2, 4 K X M 2/A-A.2, 2/F-G and G/2-3.2. Reinforcing steel and grout cells were in accordance to the rn z approved drawings and specifications. C:� the 4'-0" high CMU only the CMU cells will rebar were Monitored the grouting of walls, and grouted and consolidated mechanically. Prepared (3) 4x4x8 grout prisms, as the representative O'n sample of this grout specimen to be laboratory cured for strength analysis. The contractor had n Zo laid (3) 8x8xl 6 CMU prisms, which will not be grouted for strength test. The 1/2" diameter anchor X C m bolts for the bottom plate were wet set into the grouted CMU cells, at 48" on -center, with 7" m 0 _Cft minimum embedment into the grouted CMU. 0 r- 0 IT To the best of our knowledge, items inspected this date are in accordance with approved plans C ca C co Im and specifications. z P INSPECTOR: Yavita Kotomaimoce M z U5 z ECEIVE:D 0 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS REVIEWEDBY: 7/=� Timoth Beckerle, P.E. YO cc: Jeff Surridge - JTS Property Solutions; Bldg Dept - City of Edmonds I Everett MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC 917-134thStreeISW Suit. A -I E a v WIVIA98204 Ph 425,742.9360 tax 425.745.1737 CONCRETE LABORATORY TEST REPORT Project No: E6068 Project Name: 701 Cedar Street Issued on: 04/13/06 Site Address: 701 Cedar Street Sample Set ID: 27227 Edmonds, WA Permit # (s): 2006-0043 Client: JTS Property Solutions Original: j'/ Engineer: W A Dame Revised: L] Contractor: Quality Home Improvement FIELD DATA ASTM C39 and C109 Air Temperature: 49*F Actual Mix Proportions: Weather: Overcast Product: Grout Supplier: Site Mix Ticket Number: S53059 MixDesIgn ID: 6 sack [fn�fflai- t S�o- Entrained Air Trig �efe imp. F IA! M C31) (ASTM C231) I (A� 57'F NR NR ST— --- F- -- - A— F 4J, ;-d7-1 ump M di, S—P*e) F�e. 9-3/4" 04/04106 Required Strength (fc): Placement Location and Notes: 4000 psi @ 28 days Set I CMU wall along building grids: A/2-3.2, 2/A-A-2, 21F-G, and G/2-3.2. COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS (ASTM C39, C1231, and C617 when applicable) Date Made Sample If Lab # Date Tested Age Size (in) Load (Ibs) Dia (in) Surface Strength (psi) Failure Code [-b-0-02 [:-5-0 __8 F-E4/03/06 [167C _42 4/1010=6 =7 =4x A_x 9�1 00 000 _ 3 1[_=67750�] NA —qA J_E41E/=06] 5/El /66 8 EIKI Q I I -�106=02=604�-Xk: --1[! .4 8:1= 0 0=0 I —NA F6 50=44 EO:6=/01/06 2=8 a:x:4 x 8 J 0=00 E06071= Remarks: Inspector(s): Kotomairnoc Reviewed �ot� ��Be.kErl., P.E. Tested by: Johnson,S.J. Branch Manager RECEIVED 7 2006 E-MAILED .43 �,Lt DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS NOTES: Failure descriptions for samples tested with neoprene pads are not required per ASTM Std. * NA = Not Applicable, S = Shear, C = Cone, CSIP = Cone and split, CSh = Cone and Shear, Cot = Columnar, FC - Field Cure, NR = Not Records All testing performed in accordance with applicable ASTIA's except C-31,10.1,2 - "recording field temperature Information In this report applies only to the actual samples tested and shall not be reproduced without the approval of Maya$ Testing Engineers, I= MTEForm#I60,Rcv3.7,0 z 3: m m 0 -40 , 0 C , X M ITI z C > 0 -n -n M Im 0) 0 6 Fn C 0) C 0) M C) z z z 0 0 m 0 14 LANDAU ASSOCIATES MEMORANDUM TO: City of Edmonds FROM: Michelle L. Ramos, P.E., L.G, RECEIVEr) DATE: March 23, 2006 MAR 2 4 2606 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR ""a"y e CITY OF EDMONDS RE: 701 CEDAR STREET, TFmPORARY RETAINING WALL PIRES C4 16/ Gr7 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memorandum is to address stability concerns for temporary shoring along the A eastern side ofthe excavation at 701 Cedar Street in Edmonds, Washington. Our current understanding of schedule, as indicated by Jeff Suridge, is that this temporary wall will be removed in about I week time from the date of this memorandum. It should be noted that at the time of this memorandum, the current wall has been in place about I week. Landau Associates was retatined by AKA Design (now JTS Property Solutions) to perform a limited geotechnical investigation to identify depth to adequate bearing for the foundation ofthe proposed :A A truction foundation sub ade verification The results of that limited addition and to prov e u ng cons investigation and subgrade recommendations were presented in a report dated March 2, 2006. Generally, adequate soil bearing (2000 psf) was encountered at a depth of about 2 to 3.5 feet below the original grade of the site. Recently, when Landau Associates was asked to perform during construction inspection of the footing subgrade, we noted that the footing depths and subsequent cuts for construction of the footings were deeper than our original assumptions, which were stated in our proposal and our March 2 report. Our stated assumptions included "no significant cuts would be required." As a result of the cuts required to construct the footings and the proximity of the neighboring house to the east, temporary shoring was placed by the contractor (Quality Improvement Company). Landau Associates was not asked to provide recommendations for the temporary shoring prior to its installation. The initial temporary shoring is reported to have consisted of a row of stacked ecology blocks along the eastern edge of the excavation. Prior to Landau Associates commencing our first subgrade verification visit, the blocks fell over. The failure mechanism is not known. After our initial subgradc verification visit by a staff engineer, a senior engineer with Landau Associates performed a field visit to respond to a neighbor's concern regarding the stability of the 130 2nd Avenue South - Edmonds, WA 98020 - (425) 776-0907 . fax (425) 778-6409 - www.1andaultic,com z 0 0 M excavation and the temporary shoring. The contractor was in the process of re -building the wall and reportedly removed some soft ground from under the failed wall and replaced it with crushed rock prior to re -building the temporary wall. Subsequent observation of the re -built wall indicates that the wall is composed of ecology blocks that have been stacked 3-blocks high. The ecology blocks are generally 2- feet wide, 2-feet deep and 6-fect long. The wall is generally in the shape of a long "L" with the long leg oriented in a north -south direction. The south end of the wall terminates at the existing house and the short leg of the wall is at the northern end. Currently the first (lowest) row of blocks has been used as sacrificial form -work for the footing such that only the top 4 to 6 inches of the block is exposed. Because of the previous instability of the slope behind the wall, we recommend the bottom -most row of blocks remain in place to reduce the potential impact of wall removal to the slope and it is our understanding that the bottom Tow of blocks will be left in place. The configuration of the soil on the back side of the wall varies from the north end to the south end. At the north end, the soil contacts the back side of the wall about 3 feet below the top of wall, is inclined at about 60 degrees measured from the horizontal with the top of the slope about 4 feet above the top of the wall. At the south end of the wall, the soil contacts the back side of the wall about I foot below the top of the wall and is inclined at about 45 degrees with the top of slope about 3 feet above the top of the wall. All dimensions, depths and estimates of slope behind the wall were reported to Landau Associates by Jeff Suridge and have not been surveyed to confirm accuracy, The static stability of the temporary shoring was analyzed for three wall configurations. The first two conditions are for the wall and slope configurations described above. The third configuration assumes soil to the top of the current wall with a 45 degree backslope. This corresponds to the possible geometry of the slope/wall at the south end of the wall if the soil behind the wall sloughs to the top of the wall. Although the engineering properties of the soils on the slope, behind the wall and under the wall are not known, it is our opinion that they will be remain stable for the next week, presuming they are protected from the elements and from surface water run-off. Soil properties of the retained soil were estimated based on our observations of the soils under the black tarp currently covering the slope and our experience on sites with similar soil types. Based on our analyses, the current configuration of the wall is considered stable with a calculated factor of safety of about 1.5. As is typical with temporary shoring, the wall was not analyzed for seismic loading. If the soil behind the wall were to slough against the wall, we estimate the factor of safety would be reduced to about 1.3. 2 LANDAuAsSOCIATES Z 0 M M C: M 0 MM Z q i Z �' I 3: 0 MM 0 091 C M 0 Z 0 Z 0 M M it is important to note that these calculations are based on our understanding of the soil and wall conditions at the time of this report, If conditions change, Landau Associates should be retained to re- evaluate the stability oftbe wall. Even though the static analysis indicates factors of safety above 1.0, it should be noted that the slope and temporary shoring configuration do not meet the standard requirements of Part N of Chapter 296-155 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) for Excavation, Trenching and Shoring. Because the slope and the shoring configuration do not meet the requirements, Section 296-155-66109 of the WAC requires that M "The registered Professional Engineer shall inspect the work site at the beginning of each shift, after any change in weather conditions and after any change in the circumstances of 5i I adjacent property. S2 rn a The Professional Engineer shall make a written report of each inspection, the report shall m 0 0 be kept on file at the work site, and the report shall be made available to the director or C X M the authorized representative of the director upon request. M Z 10-4 All recommendations of the registered Professional Engineer regarding the excavation > C: and soil conditions shall be followed." (0 n -n Additional safety recorturiendations include: rn M Maintaining the plastic sheeting over the slope to reduce the potential for soil sloughing. The 0 CA sheeting should be placed such that surface water and rain water are both kept off of the slope. r- Limiting the number of workers and time spent adjacent to the wall. M C) Z Ifafter reviewing this report, you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Z V) Z M OMMS 3 LANDAU AssociArEa 7777�: N,::gddad mhughtemilecI60do,poebackslop-cl goemil UJUS Block With Design Sur No� So.th.ed.f..0 P.J., 70, C 1,581.0 KMIGHWALL N—Her —0. ..ondI.WA E. d.g,. B..k.l.p. -11 cod .,k.l,,, So), to ....... Block Height Width UnftWI Uhil Weight (xl) Sok - B..q. Unit Weight (poll Bell - Role 1,,d 1,1cle"A"gichill)1*11-11 Well E.bW..e' (I It hplool, C..ffid.nt of Mich - ("') =Mco.,e (0.) Well (dog. heockef'. koh, .10.1) (1.% otmAce cf—o,enco to N SURCHARGE (pooloo to slope) (P�Q e.,. cept H, huhlocre oplied t � f-- We-) ...-f ftf.ty.e ..W. Feel.— B, We" Heig. (H) we" Eh,bod-.t (H—b). I it w1col (R) ..plcw VAT's W0 Help (He) IM J'S TapWidthdWelit8l) tedie.tianefoolkf-IT (ei go. hoo. hot P..) (it CC bcl.)#od� 3: M WoUSatter(Spha)(tod) Z Boole Z. hed goll-Ratched Col. Me to hik"Fop(hed1sa-Conciale 0 -n ,oI.p..-C.,Eckoe(F.c.-),Kp 11118MMMO ocol.oge �.hfhol peeive R.0�htnch (,be, F,,;r.n..hfM.ndk� m *"-E,Wlldlldl M "c"ch .IlW.1,.d, Hogboon)[Commonl,ph 0 V.,kelcoePo'ch"P� M-0 C: Sod..g.LcSd,qgbeIft)-Tol 2 M.0 K H—tal, 0 M 0 W, Wy FdIchhCo.m ..LF D.S5 W SOM W..Wwcbt 60D.S, i i.00 Go) 0 e... :OiIWGd OlWt(tDP�dgS) GGD 2 0. 1.. 0.01) ". 0 )JW.:,2WtEokme,dQo) 0 0 3 OAD IM Goo GOD E. . z No—' Fee- N MIS AAS TO ell I -W% 0.00 2Z 067 000 000 go" F, 42:6.8 AASHTO $0112-80% 0100 2.00 Go. 0.00 0.00 OdOng Force. Id 2 .1 To 1. 500.0D M.OD ME, FACTOROFSAFETT(FOS) 17.12 z w Reclefing Noheal. .1 S too FEE � 1.5 CNIng M...t. W S!�ddlh, FOS b 0.07 FACTOR OF SAFETY (FOB) 3.49 0 2.00 m bl:FlI 01 h-ene ggFCM�U bz PA. ;:2(T :d.,.In FO8Ekfl..lc)-I.1 0:0 1.00 ... .... I-P —mielehe"od—loot. Ce 2. SM48 Re$,jtahtFIicImMIcck,15VA�S 67t.4. A a hth M. --- 6—�,0.3 OR x 0.13 1.11 1,33 OR 16513 Units Bind, Wall Camilla Note: handed F.& an pssWit chat to candin. acting In faint of H t_ N,ftenci P"Rhk 70ICadinsecal 2.69LOCKWALL No gains, Losestion Edmsi shi.4inichl. 1:4 Sedation. Wall Gesselbyand SecallopO Sell Pa...,.,. Black Islam Within unim Una Weight (Pd) Soll: Blickfil Ell unit Weight (P-0 Sa0 R'sh"In't it Ffthw Angto (dog) San - Bodfill Flation All, San do .:R Fdoid, Anal. .=a Wag EIcbedicent (I ft;pIcal Homb) Coeldical of 11,1111"looldiallain z 3molmlods.niiIiinant. nd" 0 Wall Better (Asset (dog, dhdk� none vidical) ec—I.O... Adni.ocil. Okinin 1 0 0 SURCHARGE (postal (pal) (10%ontena.d.—d! ... InMM) m (ads annt a dejeh K munda opened M M frosc bass) F,.nt$l ... Indlemin isi Fado-st Safety Ia Phonstent R.M.1ande F777U F. (do.) — -4 -n none, all's, I. dow—no donna) Geonces, C.I..nato m OssilnWIM1,10,; (H) 00 Wtnl� Embeconnarn"(2nd), wic., m m finannalso Wall ftills, 0 Ei,doodivislicalwalt) "I 'all dnWhd`hdWsJI(ab) Top Width 3: M M 0 W.hS.h.'(.W.)Qad) �aftp Salland. 3: inths, 1, 1, IIA FhcehdtA�11'1 lo"�. 0 Fd ImA hed he theinchat Osi IM (..at S.SH) 'n FdassAligh(esconSoll-C—le p"fle.m.1fanns) 0. Donipa,(edift)(incessinal,J) Activo adhP Coefficheal iIa Dan. P. shaill .1-lan—tin m m t Fa,,I,: ftss=MdeM (Factonsin, his IMMMO —k-fitagilt)- "".1 Cht-hahnacnin r*MrS57877:1 Friction - Instead 01) 0 1. Pihasw Ronstare, Oas) "dl...IjW.fl(`ad) 0 M Static Laos P Plant) hed) C (a m 0) Hoo—, Conadi F, 'b Mm 0 m 0 VinicalCoodachonaN Sundials, Lsad, notIft) -Tosal a M`O f— q Hannan 1. On Reshole-0,511,11i Runscon.t.0—cal- Finslics, Cosellikeds. F Mock Wx, wv '4 1 1.0 100 wait Weight hout) SIM 16601"D SonWedgaIWI(Inamdge) one 2 haDS0 t.w as 560� a... Salw"d,"Ilballadwadit.) Us a a.. 0. 0.00 Zon 2.67 (1) honest AASHTO act I - W1. Force N Rmet� F, 45,14. AASKO 612-80% 0.00 ZOD cA7 0.00 0.00 z Dri,in F..' Fal ...I, Total. 1120M 1120M FACTOR OF SAFETY JFOS) ..97 schlong Nascent, M, 91 M S::ddI.v,FO 5 2.00 ho Mwo I. Mid m a 1.9 C. Onn".) III ��'3 FACTOR OF SAFETY (FOS) I.. cA lal b,:Plr Pa. 2.w 0, naming FOS* 2.0 40 :,ahannig FOS (Ulthal.) 1.1; It - an 2.0 G... entene, p suchation.edlift.l... 'M 1 1410,36 RJnhit Felt 1, M dlcictlfA�B N' 14%3a .. a N!, 3.42 6,A_ 67 042 NO 4.58 1.20 NO none 2.1111 Ulu, Stock Well Design Ww. nufund F.S. an passlue duo to donvala Wind In to.( .1 -11 As .... d ..It to eup .1 —11 PrOnt 701 Clue, Steal 38WCKWA� No Radio, U.0.a Edoul d.g.. Bookstall Wait Glonelow #ad Sack,111, Sell Pendant. Stook Relent WID4 UdRWt Unit Might (od) SO - Sacluill Unit WIlght led) SO - Retained Ann FdOne, d:�,�S in d ,.a a Ed�l F.I. Audi. ( 91 We] Enno,dount (I it hpioul, Hondo) ::q� -0,35 8d.1k.la dgI. Runs) S1.9) Wall Boder (a lions) idea, docW1, fauh, uW1.1) A� van Confident QT.) SURCHARGE(pa Mollostapo)(pel) F7770 Oda morn depth H, resubno OPPand.1 W2 than boss) of safety ad P.. &a,—. h' ughh", feldn"andod ld-PIN) Godasnuoycea.l.u.n. -4 Des goWs I Haight (H) X, Wal: Sundolionalt (H,,b), t it tdoual (it) 00 I.Ohdadw.111-IdIgh,01w) "oodandth'-d—wall -(a I — hill 8 B.t_d I 0 0 TdFWWdfthofWs%(Bb) a,." " "0 " we" (done) (.d' Indian. of (—d.ulkalm f— lo.,—ou Piano) (b--) (addh m W.118.11.0unds)(ad) c .1 W dhVa.o,—oupl.RA(ln FookamAugle(hal)SO-BaCkfill ',ddaAql (M :al:Rotalned to 0 "n d) 0 C Fdion Angi: (.d) —1. Calls Poo (bool) dolls at OAH) "n Auttuo Earn Palsonal Costuldent, los Dan. peloodue , Cmftvt (Factmed), Kp So. Chl-Panctfoualkhand v m M Peseta. Restated. (to,) Fddw Rool (had) .11 FdOnon So" We, 0 x Sodic Land, P TWO Backslopa angTo (and) Ph - M 0 c 0) J lot Cdurjhdndo,� a M .1 M-0 Sanduadis Lose, a (lbefift) � Tual m 0 z Hft000l. Qh Vd1.1. Ou Poseltuda—SlIdInQ Rousten.—Oundaudd, FddiohCod clont,F 0 M 01od, wa, wv in Well vought I Now Loo �do 56.00 IMC. MOM Sal Wedgal M (towedge) Can 2 WCOO 1.00 , So od Sd:WedhQWt(bdddM"dos) a. 0 � 14.0 1.00 d, 14d, 36CD Ndduod F—. N JECS. AA HTO I'll I - 80-A 01. "' " " CCO 2 1:;" Sildin Resistance. F, 4.12.. AASHTO ad 2 - 00% C. a.. 0.00 DhAng Foau% Fd .. 27 TOO. MOM 120.0 2835dit FACTOR OF SAFETY (FOS) a,. X, 1.00 Roosuln, M..W, MI S TO I IX �.2,, QaI,,ng Modo.a. Md 0 �d�ul S: d . To$ (S.I..Ic) 1A Go �:w FACTOR Of SAFETY (FOS) 1.14 m 10 bI - Pit 2,S O.dd �mg FOS> 24 b2 � Pa. 2,7. O=h do FOSIS.1".10,11.6 fl:Qh :21 G .... .... I., P'...... Isluen. and Mad.n. f2 Q� 2 C. N 11 F.WnhuddleinlIA,15 .: 2 A B ::2 Not 057 031 No X N 1.60 1.33 0 q.. 247M. M 0 as LANDAu, ASSOCIATES Field Re oft Project Name: '701 cedc"- sl�- Project Number: Location: Date: 5'1�ql hc� -1:30�" Client: -Te q-� ALA- Desj�' Landau Rep: /,I - Weather Conditions: _��C r 1A S, Description of work done, locations, equipment used, quantity estimate (indicate location and elevation, and mark locations on plans, use separate paragraph for each subject work item, show if approved as meeting specifications or not). b�'- s4c 0-4 )'.10 2 Co— Fo.�;Pgj r . ...... . ...... . .......... ale', g-d CfVS14 se I Y-A xffca V'A'el'� t� A-- 4-� 1-4 L wa,(, 0a, I /e 2000 "54,4,9L Visitors: RVICES CTS. cily EJ)MONI)s Unsatisfactory Conditions & Recommended Correction Attachments: Distribution: Signed — 3nW06 C.��--iSheilkLOCALS-IXTrMPOR-I\OLKAOF[Ild-RIPA,40C z 0 m m 0 C E2 C m m '0 -4 0 .n x m m 0 0 M M 0 Z r- z --4 i 3: 0) z 9 0 m Everett MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC 917 - 134th Suool SW Suite A-1 Y: Everett WA 98204 ph 425.742.9360 tax 425.745.1737 CONCRETE LABORATORY TEST REPORT Project Name: 701 Cedar Street Project No* E6068 Issued on: 05/02106 Site Address: 701 Cedar Street Edmonds, WA Sample Set ID: 27227 Permit # Is): 2006-0043 Client: JTS Property Solutions Original: RI Engineer: W A Dame Revised: E] Contractor: Quality Home Improvement FIELD DATA ASTM C39 and C109 Air Temperature: 49*F Actual mix Proportions: Weather: Overcast Product: Grout Supplier: Site Mix Ticket Number: S53059 M A Y 8 MixDesign ID: 6 sack BUIUMNG DEPT. F Sample T-mp-- InitaiStor.g. Temp. F _JF (ASTMC1064) ASTM C31) 11, (ASTMC231) 57'F NR NR Slump (ASTM C1 F-9--ple(.) Redd: I -------------- 9-3/4" 04/04106 Required Strength (f c): [Placement —Lcati,, and Nte-, 4000 psi @ 28 days Set 1 CMU wall along building grids: A/2-3.2,2/A-A.2, 2/F-G, and G/2-3.2. COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS (ASTM C39, C1231, and C617 hen applicable) Date Made Sample# Lab # Date Tested Age Size (in) Load (Ibs) Dia (in) Surface Strength (psi) Failure Code ----�F5042 ELI F0002 ---I[ =16=.73 Full F-2 il� =x4 F -0-00 1 F-1 7 22 F28 123=080 E�m:117 517 Remarks: Inspector(s): Kotomaimoc Reviewed by� '*Tl�moh'�y G. Beckerle, P.E. Tested by: Le, Q. Branch Manager E -MAILED NOTES: Failure descriptions for samples tested With neoprene pads are not required per ASTM Sid, All testing performed In accordance with applicable ASTM's except C-31, 10.1.2 -"recording field temperature information in this report applies only to the actual samples tested and shall not be reproduced without the pp—.1 of Mayes Testing Engineers, Inc. MTEForm#160,Rev3.7-0 MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC. i5vorett Office 917-134th Street SW Suite A-1 Eiverelt, WA 98204 MASONRY PRISM TEST REPORT ph 425.742,9360 fax 425.745.1737 Tacoma Office IOD29 S. Tacoma Way Job No.: E6068 Permit No.: 2006-0043 Suite E-2 Tacoma, WA 98499 Project: 701 Cedar Street Date Rec'd.: 4-5-06 ph 253.584.3720 fax 253.584.3707 Client: JTS Property Solutions Date Issued: 5-12-06 Portland Office Contractor: Quality Home Improvements X Original 0 Revised 7911 NE 33rd Drive Suite 190 Portland, OR 97211 FIELD DATA (ASTMC1314) ph 503. 281.7515 tax 503.281.7579 Date Laid: 4-3-06 Mortar Producer: Type of Unit: N-1 Design rc/28 days: ASTM / UBC Spec: C90 Mix Proportions: Site Mix Size of Unit: 8x8x8 Cement: Unit PSI Required: 1500 Lime: Sand: Water: Design F'm: 1900 Grout Producer: Date Grouted: Design fc/28 days: Mortar I Grout as Spec: Mix Proportions: Cement: Yes No Sand: AlrTemp: Gravel: MortarTemp: Water: GroutTemp: WRA: Remarks /Locations: CMU wall along building grids A/2-3.2,2lA-A.2,2/F-G.3' G/2-3-2- rtgnpro—inn Tpgt MachimalufactiLWou Diameter of Spherical Seat: 6.83 Req. Upper Bearing Plate Thickness: 1.98 Provided Upper Bearing Plate Thickness: 5.0 Req. Lower Bearing Plate Thickness: 0 Provided Lower Bearing Plate Thickness: 5.0 COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS (ASTMC1314) [L.b # Date Tested Age Grouted Yes No HtT " Factor " Total Load Ilbs Net A S,. In. strength psi PSWlith Hrr Factor T) F n 2180 X 08 2.08 1.007 1' 101240 29.. 86 3390 3410 C L2181 — 5-12-06 -- 39 X 2.07 10�71,006 1.006 137860 27.. 3680 3700 2182 5.19.06 39 x �2.07 1.006 �137860�27,81 19ARin 97 �3b 3 20 i Legend: CB-Conlcal Break, CSh-Cone & Shear, CSp-Cone & Split, TB -Tension Break, SCB-Semi-Corfic V Break, SB-Shear Break, FSS-Face Shell Separation M Al' 2 G 2" 0 DrVELOPMENT �FIJVICES, CTR. CITY')." ;DNDS INSPECTOR: Yavita Kotomaimoce E-MAILED REVIEWED BY: z 9 0 in JUN-15-2006 10!5Z AM DUNAWAY P.01 Dunaway Surveying, Inc. 23201 - 53rd Ave. S,E., Bothell, WA 98021 (425) 486-1630 Fax (776) 306-3053 Emall = dunawavaurvayingficomeast.n June 16, 2008 Jeffery T Surridge Rw. Height certification on 701 Cedar St., Edmonds, WA 98020 z Door Mr. SurrIdge: On June 15, 2006 a survey crew from Dunaway Surveying, Inc. checked the high point of the roof :4 on the above reference address as it existed on that day and found It to be at elevation 189.74 feet. The maximum allowable height as calculated by us and Shown on a map dated 1111412006 am a Is 190.07 feet, I hereby certify to best of my knowledge that this elevation is true and correct m 0 ' 'i� Sincerely 0 John D. 6ungrway P.L.S. Dunaway Surveying, Inc. m 10 '4 > 0 M m 0' 0 C CA m 0 4 1141 ?4!o I' > z z 0 m Receive JUN 15 20os DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF EDMON CTR- DS GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 Websile: i.edmondS.wa,us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1) Planning Building - Engineering June 28, 2006 Jeff& Tanii Surridge Z PO Box 553 0 Lynnwo od, WA 98046 Re: Building Permit: 2006-0043 Site Address: 701 Cedar St. a Expiration Date: 1/17/07 in in Dear Mr. & Mrs. Surridge, 0 8 0 C The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the last remaining inspection on your in rn project is a final inspection(s The final inspection(s) determines that there are no Z outstanding life -safety issues and approval allows the City to close your permit file. �; The City considers the final inspection to be one of the most important inspections o -n conducted on a project. In order to grant final approval the following must be complete- a smoke detectors, house numbers, guardrails, han drails, self -close doors between garage in M and residence, egress from sleeping rooms, safety glazing, weather-stripping, any 0 Engineering department req uirementsetc. Of course not all of these things may OM ject but it does give you an idea about the kinds of things specifically apply to your proj C 0) (a that must be complete as well as some items that do not need to be installed such as: 0 paint, carpet, moldings, wallpaper, etc. Please be advised permits expire one year from the date of issuance. If you will need more time to complete the work, permits can be renewed prior to expiration for one half fees. If the permit expires w ithout a final approval granted by the Building Inspector, full fees are required in order to renew the Z permit. This can be very costly to you and we strongly encourage you to check your permit expiration date and call for the required final inspection(s). Note: If more than one department is required to final your project, this is noted on your Job Card. Please reel free to contact me at 425-771-0220 if you have any questions. 0 m "Y' J)cerely, oAi �ic tI- uf Peru it p cialis N" Incorporated August 11, 1890 MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC Evereff Office W-134th Street SW Suite A-1 Everett , WA 98204 ph 425.742,9360 MITE No.: E6068 ieX 425345.1737 Project: 701 CEDAR STREET Tacoma Office 10029S. Tacoma Way Address: 701 Cedar Street, Edmonds, WA Suite E-2 Permit No.: 2006-0043 (City of Edmonds) Tacoma, WA 98499 ph 253.584.3720 W 253.584.3707 Owner: JTS Property Solutions Portland ON - Architect: AKA Design 7911 NE 33,d Drive Engineer: W. A. Dame Suite 190 Portland, 08 97211 Contractor: Quality Improvement ph 503.281,7515 Page 4 fax 503.281.7579 Date: 6122106 Weather: Sunny Inspection: Project Management Sample(s): Reported to the office and reviewed the above project file and found no nonconforming items and it appears that all required inspections are now complete. Contacted Tom (Quality Improvements) and covered all items on the proposal and all items have been completed and project is ready to be closed out. To the best of our knowledge, items inspected this date are in accordance with approved plans and specifications. INSPECTOR: Mike Mattox E-MAILED REVIEWED B�$' —�E. 7-E7 LUL Lt-?&— thy G. Be4.k, cc: Jeff Surridge — JTS Property Solutions; Bldg Dept — City of Edmonds z 13 m c: 0 1 m 0 0 0 m mz O"n n M M 0 0 0 C C ca M 0 z z 0 0 m li Office MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC 917-134th Street SW Suite A-1 MMSM�_ , "MIZ-1 N� Derail, WA 98204 ph 425.742,9360 fax 425.745.1737 MTE No.: E6068 Project: 701 CEDAR STREET Tacoma Office 10029S. Tacoma Way Address: 701 Cedar Street, Edmonds, WA Suite E-2 Permit No.: 2006-0043 (City of Edmonds) Tacoma, WA 98499 ph 251584.3720 fax 253.584.3707 Owner: JITS Property Solutions Portland Office Architect: AKA Design 7911 NE 33,d DrWe Engineer: W. A. Dame Suite 190 Portland, OR 97211 Contractor: Quality Improvement ph 503.281.7515 Page 3 fax 503.281.7579 z 0 Date: 5/25106 Weather: i -n Inspection: Epoxy Grout -4 Sample(s): m C: Observed epoxy grouting of 1" threaded rod into CMU on I -line and 2-line (4 total). Holes were m 80 drilled 19' deep, cleaned, and filled with Simpson "Set!'and threaded rod. All per S3. -4 X M Inspected 3/16" weld connections for structural steel "starburst' at roof level. Apex welded the pieces together. All per Standard Steel's shop drawings and details, and notes on structural z drawings. -4 3: To the best of our knowledge, items inspected this date are in accordance with approved plans 0 and specifications. -4 C INSPECTOR: Lisa Pyper 3: m IT 0, 0 IT Cn M 0 Z X JUL 1 7 20PR z z 0 m E-MAILED REVIEWED IS Y�4t6hy G a-B..k.r cc: Jeff Surridge - JTS Property Solutions; Bldg Dept - City of Edmonds 7 IN I M KLANDAU ASSOCIATES MEMORANDUM 0 LOU TO: City of Edmonds FROM: Michelle L. Ramos, P.E., L.G. DATE: March 23, 2006 TFNIPORARY RETAINING WALL EUXP RE: 701 CEDAR STREET, r1A I Ift INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memorandum is to address stability concerns for temporary shoring along the eastern side ofthe excavation at 701 Cedar Street in Edmonds, Washington. Our current understanding of schedule, as indicated by Jeff Suridge, is that this temporary wall will be removed in about 1 week time from the date of this memorandum. It should be noted that at the time of this memorandum, the current wall has been in place about I week. Landau Associates was retatined by AKA Design (now JTS Property Solutions) to perform a limited geotechnical investigation to identify depth to adequate bearing for the foundation of the proposed addition and to provide during construction foundation subgrade verification. The results of that limited investigation and subgrade recommendations were presented in a report dated March 2, 2006. Generally, adequate soil bearing (2000 psf) was encountered at a depth ofabout 2 to 3.5 feet below the original grade of the site. Recently, when Landau Associates was asked to perform during construction inspection of the footing subgraide, we noted that the footing depths and subsequent cuts for construction of the footings were deeper than our original assumptions, which were stated in our proposal and our March 2 report. Our stated assumptions included "no significant cuts would be required." As a result of the cuts required to construct the footings and the proximity of the neighboring house to the east, temporary shoring was placed by the contractor (Quality improvement Company). Landau Associates was not asked to provide recommendations for the temporary shoring prior to its installation. The initial temporary shoring is reported to have consisted of a row of stacked ecology blocks along the eastern edge of the excavation. Prior to Landau Associates commencing our first subgrade verification visit, the blocks fell over. The failure mechanism is not known. After our initial subgrade verification visit by a staff engineer, a senior engineer with Landau Associates performed a field visit to respond to a neighbor's concern regarding the stability of the 130 2nd Avenue South - Edmonds, WA 98020 - (425) 778-0907 . fax (425) 778-64G9 - www,landauinc.com z 0 :d 0 M excavation and the temporary sharing. The contractor was in the process of te-building the wall and reportedly removed some soft ground from under the failed wall and replaced it with crushed rock prior to rc-building the temporary wall. Subsequent observation of the re -built wall indicates that the wall is composed of ecology blocks that have been stacked 3-blocks high. The ecology blocks are generally 2- feet wide, 2-fect deep and 6-fect long. The wall is generally in the shape of a long "l." with the long leg oriented in a north -south direction. The south end of the wall terminates at the existing house and the short lcg of the wall is at the northern end. Currently the first (lowest) row of blocks has been used as sacrificial form -work for the footing such that only the top 4 to 6 inches of the block is exposed. Because of the previous instability of the slope behind the wall, we recommend the bottom -most row of blocks remain in place to reduce the potential impact of wall removal to the slope and it is our understanding that the bottom row of blocks will be left in place. The configuration of the soil on the back side of the wall varies from the north end to the south end. At the north end, the soil contacts the back side of the wall about 3 feet below the top of wall, is inclined at about 60 degrees measured from the horizontal with the top of the slope about 4 feet above the top ofthe wall. At the south end ofthe wall, the soil contacts the back side of the wall about I foot below the top of the wall and is inclined at about 45 degrees with the top of slope about 3 feet above the top of the wall. All dimensions, depths and estimates of slope behind the wall were reported to Landau Associates by Jeff Suridge and have not been surveyed to confirm accuracy. The static stability of the temporary sharing was analyzed for three wall configurations. The first two conditions are for the wall and slope configurations described above. The third configuration assumes soil to the top of the current wall with a 45 degree backslope. This corresponds to the possible geometry of the slope/wall at the south end of the wall if the soil behind the wall sloughs to the top of the wall. Although the engineering properties of the soils on the slope, behind the wall and under the wall are not known, it is our opinion that they will be remain stable for the next week, presuming they are protected from the elements and from surface water run-off. Soil properties of the retained soil were estimated based on our observations of the soils under the black tarp currently covering the slope and our experience on sites with similar soil types. Based on our analyses, the current configuration of the wall is considered stable with a calculated factor of safety of about 1.5. As is typical with temporary shoring, the wall was not analyzed for seismic loading. Ifthe soil behind the wall were to slough against the wall, we estimate the factor ofsafety would be reduced to about 1.3. 2 LANDAuAssociATEs Z 0 =1 0 M __4 In am Ca M 0 0 C M M Z C M M 0 0 U) M 0 ;U Z Z 0 0 M It is important to note that these calculations are based on our understanding of the soil and wall conditions at the time of this report. If conditions change, Landau Associates should be retained to re- evaluate the stability of the wall. Even though the static analysis indicates factors of safety above 1.0, it should be noted that the slope and temporary shoring configuration do not meet the standard requirements of Part N of Chapter 296-155 of the, Washington Administrative Code (WAC) for Excavation, Trenching and Shoring. Because the slope and the shoring configuration do not meet the requirements, Section 296-155-66109 of Z the WAC requires that "The registered Professional Engineer shall inspect the work site at the beginning of each m shift, after any change in weather conditions and after any change in the circumstances of i adjacent property. X C m The Professional Engineer shall make a written report of each inspection, the report shall M 0 be kept on file at the work site, and the report shall be made available to the director or 0 C the authorized representative of the director upon request. m M Z All recommendations of the registered Professional Engineer regarding the excavation C and soil conditions shall be followed." 0 Additional safety recommendations include: 'n Maintaining the plastic sheeting over the slope to reduce the potential for soil sloughing. The rn M sheeting should be placed such that surface water and rain water are both kept off of the slope. 0 0 � , Limiting the number of workers and time spent adjacent to the wall. C �"5 C (a M 0 Z r- If after reviewing this report, you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. ;0 -4 Z Z 0 0 m 3 LANDAu AssociATEs Ile us� 11"N -11 H 39 Din 1 ii H Hil. A _5 s a H g a in @ a v v RM 6 W I R g An Es =41 I NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. lg o N't oo ME I � . 5n 5 A 188 I 5' H Wt.. odmd F.S. on ploWe line to eoo�ef, fw' ag In foot of ml .11 '. top of it 701CO-Sloot 38LGCKW— No Be., L—flon Edoo,de. WA d.I.. ft-dep. del. —1 Well Geomnv elld Width U11twt Um We ghl Cori) w . B'w'N al.ol, moigh, Unit Weight(pol) SOP, Rallined I Fdotio, A.91. (deg) S.3 - Balkfil F,od,ol An& (d.9) Sol, Retaked F—AnglIldeGS I-Clotolle Well Enno.doom (I ft;tl—I He-) of I'll, in (dai " w He& —on .(. Well 11—Wolnel) Swinot . ..... SURCHARGE 1. .") (P.9 f7775R (.nt, depth H. —N.., wd.. m in— We.) F. Ind "on, We nooM, --(on) Flow, or s,ftw on Flew, Rowell... we f. —o, M.Ping) Goornewcel.. Net, W0 Height (H) W I'aodww'llmdgho(�) c: C, all Eot'donell (Mo.), I it twoll (it) Epm,d VlodnNo WIN PkIght (He) B.I—Wwihfw.,(Bb) 0 C To;,WWIhdrvW0(SO ot 'noll o' ile-" ol000.�Wd. 1— hoftoolid P..) ��'oeo (led, Watt Slow (alphe) (ood) A 'T Elfthpono.o.C.I.W.U.n. c 3.11c op 1. 10A VnoleN) Inct Ang. led = ftkfal Fol. Angle �ooi Stil:Rwomd Om.ite. Sm Connote Fdot"' An& (ood) (...I I—) QbN I it) e.I. . lild-1) -n Done Pal (lb0t) (Olt, 01 CEH) (Noot -""n" Act.e ElothP-11no Coofilditol- No '.NlW potiono. C.Wdlnl (F.cloned), Kp on,' Chl-Inoodoodkilgo1W rdneon � RAW, rn T Fllno, (",N) d 1,I) am t'd.1loo-S-W-40" 0 St,fin Lood, P Vbsgt) 0. (led) Hod— C.) rn I P, b.0 C w Ceonooelo. P, c co S�eolloptond,diodd)-Tllod M-0 �ooal, On M 0 "t""'p, An Reel,den—SIldle, R.W...—O—od.- W WVFdot. C.ffilleol. F 0.35 alod, 3.50 W'Soo w im.00 W., wo", Ilion. I m.w I.w Sol Wedgel W, pop odg.) 0.. 2 w w I.. I.. EEOIOD .0. Wedg.2 Wt (boolo Md99) I.to. I.. 0� S T-w �5.00 N000n F-e. N 1605.2 ME No, I - 8.% e SWft Reedsom Ff 4.12. AA$WO W12.W% 2.. 1.17 o. .oWl. F—, 776.27 T.— I—oo i2w,. —.00 FACTOROFSMETY(FOS) e.. in Re'Aling N,tooend' S �ddlng F S 11.6 1 V 1 2S —Ing M--. Aid IRA. b FACTOR OF $AFETY (FOS) 1.14 m 0' bI - P11 2,ln. Coentl :�: FO � 2A t b2 - P.. 2.70 o FOS(Solemlc)�1.5 H-Qh ftlol,, p,..... Minl000l.nd Med.o. CN-Q, t leol. P.N.4ol F.Ul In M nn, Im— A S. 067 -1 Ho 0 031 I.og .0 .:So q to .-. t, q— MEMORANDUM Date: January 4, 2007 To: Street Files for 701 and 711 Cedar Street From: Jen Machuga, Planner Subject: Court order to move property line between 701 and 711 Cedar Street C' 0 M 0 0 C: -q z ("I 3: M During inspection of an addition on the property addressed 701 Cedar Street (approved in Z under BLD-2006-0043), it was found that the addition did not meet the minimum C 2 required 5-foot side setback from the eastern property line. The property owners at 701 -1 and 711 Cedar Street brought the property line dispute to court, and a court order was issued moving the southern 79.09 feet of the property line separating these two properties 0 -n 'n to the east by 1.40 feet. The addition at 701 Cedar Street (under BLD-2006-0043) now perty line; however, meets the minimum required 5-foot side setback from the eastern pro in m because it still does not meet the 5-foot 065 the original house continues to be nonconforming 0 0 side setback from the eastern property line. C M 0 See the attached documents for reference. z z 0 in City of Edmonds 0 WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Kevin B. Hansen 111CROP, Livengood, Fitzgerald and Alskog, PLLC 121 Third Avenue P.O. Box 908 Kirkland, WA 98083-0908 QUIT CLAIM DEED Grantors: JAMES S. KNOWLSON AND MARY F. KNOWLSON,. husband and wife Grantee: THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY CEDAR FAMILY TRUST Legal Description: Portion of Lot(s) 3, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Tax Parcel ID No. - 004845-001-003-00 (portion thereof) The Grantors, James S. Knowlson and Mary F. Knowlson, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in order to clear title, convey and quit claim to The Snohomish County Cedar Family Trust the following -described real estate, situated in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, together with all after -acquired title of the Grantors therein: The West 1.40 feet of the South 79.09 feet of Lot 3, Block i, 'rHE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. Z 9 0 m -4 "n M m 0 -10 0 C m m '0 c: > 01 n m M a 0 0 M 0 ;D Z Z 0 M RICROP, DATED: December 2-?,, 2006. James S. Knowlson z 0 Mary F. Kno n ly m STATE OF WASHINGTON :q 9 ss. Fft om COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH a ma 0 On this day personally appeared b 80 efore me James S. Knowlson and Mary F. Knowlson, husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within X M m and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary acts and deeds, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. C —Z > GIVEN under my hand and official seal this �2 dayof December, 2006. 84 0, It, M M (NW N-0 0 .0 C (0 NOTARY PU8LIC in and for the -�ARY 0 State of Washington, residing m 0 Z r- at !q S>n PU My commission expires: F z Z m RETURN NAME & ADDRESS -17 15 vor C- ij rin" C l lto'q UP Y 20061229 0738 8 PGS f2lt 1 0 S I Please print neatly or type Information Document Title(s) Stipulation and Order, judgment in Rem, and Decree Quieting Title z Reference Number(s) of related documents: 0 14 Additional Reference We on page Grantor(s) (Last, Finit, and Middle Initiall C Knowlson, James S. Knowlson, Mary F. 0 0 0 Additional Grantors on page Grantee(s) (Last Flist, and Middle Iniffal) M Z ID --I The Snohomish County Cedar Family Trust C > Additional Grantees on page Legal Description (abbreviated fonn: te. lot block, platorsection, township, range, 0 n quarteriquarter) Portion of Lot (s) 3 and 4, Block 1, THE OF EDMONDS, Th Th 5 !��GG.PLAT according to the plat thereof recorded z or —.6, P-�I-ks) 42, records of Snohomish count , Washington. Complete legal on page Assessof's Property Tax Parcel7iAccount Number 0 Fn CA 004845-001-003-00 (portion thereof) 0) Th 0 Additional parcel Vs on page_ Z The Auditor/Recorder will rely on thi; Information provided on this form. The responsibility for the accuracy of the indexing information is that of the document preparer. z 'I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an additional fee as provided in 3: CO) ROW-36.484010A understand that the-recording-process"ng-requirements-may coverup or- z otherwise obscure some part of the text of the original document. 0 ITI Signature of Requesting Party 2 3 CL11989238 4 5 6 7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON z FOR SNOHOMISH COUNTY 8 THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY CEDAR 9 FAMILY TRUST, by and through its NO. 06-2-11432-7 to Trustee, T. SURRIDGE, STIPULATION AND ORDER, FA -4 0 XM Plaintiff, JUDGMENT IN REM, AND It CM I DECREE QUIETING TITLE —100 vs. 12 [CLERK'S ACTION REQUIRED] 0 C -4 JAMES S. KNOWLSON and MARY F. 13 X M M Z KNOWLSON, 14 Defendants. ro is 16 JUDGMENT SUMMARY o"n X m M 17 Grantee: The Snohomish County Cedar Family Trust 0 0 18 Grantors: James S. Knowlson and Mary F. Knowlson 19 Judgment Amount: N/A; Judgment in rem K co M, '0 20 Abbreviated Legal Description: Portion of Lot(s) 3 and 4, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT 0 F X 21 EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of z Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. 22 Tax Parcel No.: 004845-001-003-00 (portion thereof) M z 23 Attorney for 2,1 Gran tees: Kevin B. Hansen, WSBA #28349 m 121 Third Avenue 25 P.O. Box 908 Kirkland, WA 98083-0908 26 425-822-9281 27 28 LIVENG001). FITZGERALD & ALSKOG GIVIRDAVEN I, 1 '.').'OXW' STIPULATION AND ORDER, JUDGMENT IN REM, MKI.A.. WASI INGTON 91083�M 1, N, PHO14C AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE 1 :(425) 822-9281 FAX (425)*284MR j STIPULATION 2 Plaintiff The Snohomish County Cedar Family Trust and defendants James S. �Al 3 Knowlson and Mary F. Knowlson, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby agree 4 and stipulate to the entry of the subjoined order, judgment in rem, and decree. Plaintiff 5 further agrees to release and waive any additional claims or rights, whether known or 6 unknown, against defendants' real property, including but not , limited to adverse possession 7 and prescriptive rights. Likewise, defendants agree to release and waive any claims or 8 rights, whether known or unknown, against plaintiffs real property, including but not 9 limited to adverse possession and prescriptive rights. to DATED: December Z7, 2006 DATED: December 1006 12 �ansen, Michdrd D. Wurdema-nTWSBA7T4-53 13 of LIVENGOOD, FITZGERALD Attorney for Defendants & ALSKOG, PLLC 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 16 17 ORDER, JUDGMENT IN REM, AND DECREE 18 THIS MATTER, having come before the undersigned on the foregoing stipulation, 19 and the Court being fully advised on this matter; now, therefore, it is hereby 20 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 21 1. All right, title, and interest in and to the following real property, legally 22 described as: 23 The West 1.40 feet of the South 79,09 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, THE �ELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded 24 in Volume 2 of Plats� page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. 25 Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. 26 27 is quieted in favor of plaintiff The Snohomish County Cedar Family Trust. This real property is decreed to be joined to and deemed a part of the plaintiff's adjoining property. 28 LIVENGOOD FITZGCRALD&ALSKOG U� THIRD AVENUE STIPULATION AND ORDER, JUDGMENT IN REM, —A N"'IMN98083 AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE - 2 PHONE: (425)822,9281 PAX (425)828-M8 4 z 0 =I 5i am ma 0 0 in in z > 0 -n n;a -4 x M in 0 Ui or- 0 in 0 Z r- z 5i z 0 in 2. Defendants are hereby ordered to execute a quit claim deed transferring ownership of the real property described above to plaintiff. 3. The resulting legal description for plaintiff's real property shall be: Lot(s) I and 2, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Together with the West 1.40 feet of the South 79.09 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account No. 004845-001-001-00 4. The resulting legal description for defendants' real property shall be: Lot(s) 3 and 4, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Except the West 1.40 feet of the South 79.09 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, THE KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page(s) 42, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account No. 004845-001-003-00. 5. Snohomish County is hereby ordered to correct all property records relating to the plaintiff's real property and the defendants' real property so as to comply with this Order, Judgment in rem, and Decree. A reduced survey map of the subject real properties is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 6. It is further ordered that plaintiff releases and waives any additional claims or rights, whether known or unknown, against defendants' real property, including but not limited to adverse possession and prescriptive rights. It is further ordered that defendants release and waive any claims or rights, whether known or unknown, against plaintiff's real property, including but not limited to adverse possession and prescriptive rights. LIVENGOOD, FITZGERALD & ALSKOG P.O. Box STIPULATION AND ORDER, JUDGMENT IN REM, ... X"'. WASHINGTON 98083� AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE - 3 PHONE: (415) 822-9281 FAX (425) 828-0908 z 0 m f. a I 0 �:, 0 C m z n m M 0 0 C m 0 z z z m 1 7. This Stipulation and Order, Judgment in rein, and Decree resolves all claims 2 asserted by plaintiff in its Complaint. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed with prejudice 3 and without costs. n,� 4 DATED this day of January, 2007. 5 6 i uucl�70thmi*oner z 0 7 -q 8 5 m t"% Presented by: 9 Vi --I toIce ------- In B. Hansen, WSBA #28349 0 11 of LIVENGOOD, FITZGERALD 0 C & ALSKOG, PLLC z IV,: 12 A ttorneys for Plaintiff M m z 13 C: 14 Notice of Presentation Waived; Approved as Forgi and for Entry: 0. n 16 In m 17 Richard D. wurdeman V5 0 Attorney for Defendants 0 c: CO 18 m 0 z 19 201 z 21 22 z 0 23 In 24 25 26 27 28 LIVENGOOD, FITZGERALD 121 TIORD A'ENUC� ALSKOG STIPULATION AND ORDER, JUDGMENT IN REM, PD. BOX 908 KIRKLAND. WAS[IINOMN 990 3� AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE - 4 PHONE: (425) 822-9281 PAX (425 828-MO8 77777� NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. C5 0 POO AS //W, NT 114', 25, P. �?7 Ar, -R LMUL� No.arm. Mvt =VITY. WALNUT STREET ntl= w wr =A,T, STATE Atim CROWD SCku vx .,H-. M.1 -up WC M-13�000 ALLEY I NO ONG M-lwlft V`%`RwAT.N FOR IRS W- LOT NO M-MNTB �91 "M 11/a/ml u.f WTI I NEW 1. 0.6 %3T WT 4 —No— UN. v T mm M wr Rom a ur muss N 10 w PININ4_1 p 1. .1y w IOUND it .01 T,fl, PA—M M�MT U.N. MTY Now Mz.-T z ull"I'll Nrw PA.. IN Ia. N. ON M. m %IZ fly III U. m 0 Tia, wo CEDAR STREET M., 4141� . YAW I AMNIX I "IN I NAWAV 5URVE INC. RECORDER'S CERTMOATE .......... FOR 23201 53rd.AVENUE SOUTHrJST Is'd j__4 thW iq If 20— t Thu —ur --I,. BOTHELL. WA OHOZ (425) 4118-1530 SMOH02firShr f—'Y. %05-04. MINT SURVMQ ;;am . i7TV,4.R FWAILY TRUST z �3k m me 80 a M m 0., M m a .0 0 c ca m z 0, M Z z 0 d 0, STAMEOF-WASHiNGTON COUIM OF 1, PAM I- D,MIICI�S, Givflt of the alov, e;,jI, coull, zl,e st,ul"W is � ir�ii �py of VIL, mig. Met now on Me j. nly In wiln= whe.eof, I hereLnto set: iny hand and tile Se.1 of s.1 w1gifm —Gov 2u [ECS,* CeL.tY C[3,k a, uty M ( it 09f, z dM MdS Y o xgPancy certixate fo D9PAATMENT OF BUILDIRGS PER INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL COdt,§ECTION R110 AT; 701 Cedar Street, Edmonds, WA Bul(q,!rig Permit #: 20060043 occupancy established by this certificate: IRS Dwelling Units; No. Stories: 2 Basement: As ty-l*—#Construction; VB Owner of building: The Snohomish 11-Tru" ng with the requirements of the The Single FaMIIV ResideLip a� �01 P�clar Street, EdmgWs, WA. ft"�'Oen1h4 d and approved comply! pecte y and the use for which 2003 edition of the International Residential Code as adopted 'by VW�C�tnwqroup and division of occupanc the proposed occupancy Is classified. Issued this 9th day of February 2007 Chief Building Official By: Any change of occupancy or use requires a building permit an anew Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official. Permit Inspection Details Permit: BL020060043 1601,- E-Erosion.dontrol/Motill I i I za . It I I 1 6 . n �dom I P 0 2/07/2007 Sibrel 0 comp per JH Y Total Time: 0 1013 .1E.StolulTightil,ne complete? 02107/2007 Sibrel 0 c.mp per JH Y Total Time: 0 1077:- E I Engineeripi;'Flnal e6MOlete? Y� 02/0712007 Siblel 0 comp per JH Y z Total Time: 0 110'0-B-Setbaicks'. ton , Vie , te?� Y' M 03/21/2006 MS 20 SETBACKS APPROVED PEkSURVEYOR'S REBAR PINS y Total Time: 20 74 ZR 1108 BwFodtl it 9 qT.. 03/21/2006 MS 20 FOOTINGS APPROVED y 0 M a Total Time: 20 M 0 i1w B-Omndation Wall I 0 03/24/2006 MS 20 FOUNDATION APPROVED y Total Time: 20 :C IT IT z 1120, -B-Pluitri qjqurtdWork,::.: e� j: 01 d ale 64/65/2006' MS 20 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING APPROVED Y C 2 > Total Time: 20 c '�Rm y bRoug n 6 wB-Plum h 0 -n 05/1912006 kS 20 PLUMBING ROUGH IN APPROVED y 20 n Total Time: 1128�� Tes IPEV- ' &il :�� M M -' oma,�666 ms 20 GAS TEST AND GAS PIPING APPROVED y 0 Total Time: 20 0 1130'- 131-tclulpimeni-Mecili C 06115/2 1 006 MS 20 MECHANICAL ROUGH IN APPROVED y M 0 Z Total Time: 20 C ltite,� 06108/2006 MS 20 EXTERIOR SHEATHING APPROVED y Total Time: 20 z 1136 -:i3-Sffear Complelie,? "y' r 66ti5i266B Msi 15 -SHEARAPPROVED y Total Time: is z 11140, B.HelglItt VerfflcatiO�,: complete?r�-� 06/15/ 1 2006 MS 20 HEIGHTAFPFi6VED F�RWXSHINGTON STATE LICENSED SURVEYOR (SEE y 0 IT STAMPED AND SIGNED SURVEY) Total Time: 20 11142 - B-Fraining, com- P1 ? y 06/15/2006 MS 30 FRAMING APPROVED y Total Time: 30 i144-B-Wall Insitlation/Caulk, 'completaT OB/1912006 MS 15 - FLOOR I I NSULATIO N APPRO VED y Total Time: 11146-B-Floorinsulation/Caulk. 5�2812009 3:09:24 PM Page I of 2 M 0611912006 MS 15 INSULATION APPROVED y Total Time: is ..... .... 116 Insulatl 0. L, 0611912006 MS 15 SULATION APPROVED i � Total Time: i N rpc -,at 06/2312006 ME '."is i4ETROCKAPPR&ED y Total Time: is 'o 0111112007 Snook 30 APPROVED y Total Time: 30 !bb" "'I z y Bullmk is Planning signed off. Total Time: is 0 Total InsPections: 20 Total Time: 330 3: M M 0 M M z p�. -n —1 M M M T 0 CO 0 M 0 M > z V z 0 0 M 5128/2009 3:09:24 PM Page 2 of 2 RECORD OF INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED SETBACKS ........... FOUNDATION: Footing .......... wall ................ Pier/Porch Retaining Wall ........... z Stab Insulation 0 4 PLUMBING: Underground 9- Rough-In ................... M C Commercial Final 171 0 0 0 HEATING: C 3: M Gas Test ITI Z CE Gas Piping ........... > -4 Equipment Commercial Final 0 -n q � EXTERIOR SHEATHIN G �010 -4 M M NAILING .................... CA 0 FRAMING .............. 0 C co FIRST FLOOR FRAMIN G LP 9 C ca M 0 Z INSULATION ................... Floor Insulation Wall Insulation > z Ceiling Insulation SHEETROCK NAILING z SPECIAL INSPECTION kp—L ITI MISCELLANEOUS .......... FINAL APPROVAL FOR S OCCUPANCY .................. Daftboed lj//' /4/- EVIm 7//_/,M vvswmewlqlw- 4L 000e "0WAPWd_RWdPt#_ Daftftiiltlesied ROW# AMOU12tPaId$ aq iecelpitf— Datelssued _3 ..rCS