The URL can be used to link to this page

20060056.pdfr DATE RECEtVt/ �7 PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS PERMIT NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION Joe UITEfAPT# ADDRESS '�-/ 7� OWNER NAMEINAME OF BUSINESS 21�4�IALW f z PLAT NAMEISUDDIVISION NO. LOT NO LI NO MAILINGADDRESS LID FEE S i M� / 0 1/y el PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP ",ECZ'=. IIP TEIEP"IN E EXISTING PROPOSED 13 13 R 13 REQUIRED DEDICATION _- FT E3 NAME METER SIZE I LINIIIIE I MO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED mom I YES 13 No 0 'Lz-L)W—Sw4t�'�: I: ADDRESS A REMARKS M OWNEMCONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE TELEPHONE NAME ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY CAT AULIkESS zAq lv�y J� FIRE Rr4 DATE STATE LICENSE NIJMFF1, EXPIRAJION D CK VAR SHORELINE ORAD69 D [�SREQ!ION SERA E1111T 1�< z 0 Pznw) r,��4- YEE 13 NO I i PRO PI, TK" CA# ZONE WAIVER 13 SIGN AREA ALLO EyED ' HEIGHT ALLOWED POEC. 0 IT! , V . 2 &eD - STUDY X tV I 1 bo!�r I ME- "��l R--O.ENTI: 'E3_ PLU.SINGI.ECII UIRE SETBACKS(FT) PROP LOT RE EAR I FRONT Co=SE. IGRO14TO SIDE R ALLOWED SED SETBACKS (FT.) UPSIDE REAR ADDITION �.. Eac COMPLIANCE OR 171 45_ 5- /0 nr' z i 3: ITI MIXEDUSE CHANGE OF USE C 0 REMODEL MULTIFAMILY El BID- PARKING RED. PRQ"DE. L.TARE A LAMMING REVIEWED BY DATE 0 1 11�5 A YAAL� 0 0 REPAIR FENCE f I GRADING CYDS El ( REMARKS C 9 _X_FT) 0 DEMOLISH 0 TANK OTHER M GARAG RETAINING WALL F RE SPRINKLER El Z, Ci`RPOET ROCKERY FIRE ALARM IS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE .0CCUPANT CUP -,I- -jq24IW *.0- A5 NUMBER UMBEROF 'ON 0 -n OF DWELLING STORIES ITS HON SPECIAL NjY CONSULTANT I OCCUPANT LOAD REQUIRED S 609r-5 REMARKS m T 0 CAI 0 0 ITI RiE.Po -7 :0 4--- A- j QQ YkCVHL C C/) _)�� T RUCT LD SIGN k 1, A- *2-5 (j) ITI 0 1,5,r- a4az—' D%tkIjjAj i /*OM2�/= f4f f7i�- VALUATION 7AW-4.,Lf 7-1011" + Z62 MaX, lameltioi : 25�,-3[) Description FEE_ Description FEE X > 7DI. Check '71 State Surcharge F/'O, HEAT SOU � E. LO;JeEll, '�VESTED DATE Building Permi city Surcharge Co PLAN CHECK NO: �gV Plumbing Base Fee THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PE RMIT COVERS WORK TO Mechanical IT! 1: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PRO ERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBI" Grading a 00 NMAIN (CURB% SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT APPLICATIOW SEE ECDC 19,00.0051Ai(5) Engr. Review PERMIT LIMIT SEE ICDC 11,11*1111AIIII Engr. Inspection BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection # ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR 14DIRECTLY FROM THE I SUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE .1 THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscapelnsp �Re�ipt Total Amt. Due NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.- -!�u eE.Kp' # R ce I HEREGYACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APP Ll ATION C APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I Am THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF HOC T 1,1111 P.1.1t 11 liyIld by WO THE OWNER, I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONST - TION; AND IN D ING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL Sb"tt'g1l be tfc7l.�,h,WhorDopuy:,IdF,esa,p,,d.,�d ',I IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION Ptpt IE qI.F. pld.cl WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION'!'�SURANCE AND RCW 18:2?. OFF S SI ATURE a' G F72 (425) 771-0220 RE f§08Y ATTENTION EXT. 1333 ITISUNLAWFULTOUSEOROCCUPYA BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI- ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW. NSFEdTOR I FiCATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109 I IBC110 I IRC110. PINK OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR 10104 PRESS HARD YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES r TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. L, s 4. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences September 22, 2006 Project No. T4893-1 Mi. Ross Woods Point Edwards , LLC 2801 Alaskan Way, Suite 107, RECEIVED S�attic, Washington 98121 0010 2006 ''Sijbiect:. Final Report — GeotechnIcal Observations Point Edwards Condominiums — Building 5 BUILDING DEPT. 51 Pine Streit Edmonds, Washington References: 1. Preliminary Geotechnical Report, UNOCAL Site, Project No. T-4893, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., dated November 21, 2001 St�cep Slope Hazard Review, Point Edwards Condominiums (UNOCAL Site), Project No; T-48931; prepared,by Terra Associates, Inc., dated December 13, 2002, iums �J14OCAL Site�' 1. Geologically Ha�rdbus Areas Review, Point Edwards Condonim Prcj6ct No. T4993,* prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., dated January 20, 2bW,,; 41 Supplementary Subsurface Investigation, Point Edwards Condominiums, Project No.,4893, prepared by Terra Associates; Inc., dated July 30, 2003 5. Geologically Hazardous Areas Review — Proposed Building 5 Expansion, Point Edwardi e Condominiums, Project No. T4893, prepared by TeiTa Associates, hie., dated Jun 24,,2_005, 6. Temporary Excavations � South Side ofBuilding 5, Point Edwards Condontiftiums,Pioidd No. T-403,-P'reparid by Terra Associates, Inc., dated September 1, 2005 Dear Nlr. Woods: M requested, we provided geotechnical engineering observation services during construction of Building 5 at the suhJect project. The purpo I se of our . work was to verify that geotechnical engineering elements of construction were completed i I n ' accordance with our recommendations and construction drawings approved by the City of Edmonds. We previously submitted copies of our field memos to you, Longitude 122, LLC, and the City of Edmomls. Our geotechnical observations were as follows: 1. Excavation Observation We observed the excavation for Building 5. All excavations were completed in general conformance with our recommendations. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 LOGI-MM# Phon� (425) 821-7777 - Fax (425) 821-4334 M;. R.. Wood. September 22, 2006 2. Structural Fill Material and Required Compaction Verification .We observed the placement and tested compaction of structural fill placed in the building interior and as foundation wall backfill. Based on the results of our field density testing and site observations, it is our opinion that the structural fill was placed and compacted in general accordance with our recommendations. 3.' Pile Foundation Installation We observed the installation of augercast pile foundations beneath the northern portion of Building �5. All piles were installed in general accordance with our geotechnical recommendations and the project drawings approved by,the City of Edmonds. 4. Soi[Beiwing Verification We observed all prepared foundation subgrades for Building 5.. All foundation subgrades consisted of adequately compacted structural fill or dense to very dense native silt and clay that are auitable for support of foundations designed fbr allowable bearing capacities of3,000 pounds per square foot (Psf.) and 5,000 psf, respectively. 5. Building Drainage Verification Weohqerved.installation ofsubsurface drainage placed around the perimeter ofBiulding 5, Adlilrainagesystetns we observed were -.installed in general. accordance with our geotechnical recommendations and the approved projc�t plans-. Conclusions Based on our observations during Building 5 construction, it is our opinion that the-geotechnical'items discussed above were completed in general conformance with the recommendations presented in. the referenced and with the construction drawings approved by the City of Edmonds. gemechnical reports We trust, the information presented is sufficient for your currenf needs. If you have a I ny questions or require. additional i nformation, please call. Sincerely Yo-s' TERRA ASSOCIATES, INC. Yohn C. or0j. end J. chop Princip cc: 'itude 122', LLC Project No. T-4893-1 Page No. ii LOG ITEM z 0 a M C: M6 40 0 C M M is 0 -n - n x M M a 0 0 M C 0 r W M 0 Z X -4 z z 0 M r OLYMPIC C ON SO LTI N G S ERVIUS, LLC October 23, 2006 Ross Woods Point Edwards ILLC 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 107 Seattle, WA 98121 Re: Point Edwards Condominiums Phase H Building 5 z Dear Ross: 0 Olympic Consulting Services, per your request, is providing the following brief information related to the services we have provided to date on the above referenced project. Olympic Consulting Services consulted with Weber+Thom pson, the project architect, and Point Edwards, a im C LLC representatives during the design process to assist in the development of details that address potential details that a 0 issues associated with water intrusion related to the exterior envelope of this facility. The were 6 developed address the following areas of the building --exterior walls, decks, and roof. C During construction, Olympic mad a periodic site visits to observe representative samples of the installed M M z work related to the details that had been developed for the project (Building 5). OCS provided written field 10 C reports describing what we observed during our visits. In addition, we have reviewed submittals when > requested related to the products that were used, and attended pre -installation meetings when requested, C: with the various subcontractors involved in the areas related to the details that had been developed. This letter certifies that in our opinion the work has been performed in substantial compliance with the by Weber Thompson 0 -n n X Enclosure Design and the Construction Documents which include details developed In with the assistance of Olympic for the project (Building 5). Our opinion is based on our periodic M observatio ns of the representative samples of work during the construction phase and our final site visit and 0) 0 review at the completion of construction. 0 C We hope we have provided you the information you need. If you have any questions, please do not Q C) hesitate to contact our office. Z M Sincerely, > z z George R. Faler, IRCI, RRO g Envelope Specialist Sr. Buildin RECEIVED 2005175 M Olympic Consulting Services DEC - t) 20H BUILDING DEPT. LOGITEW-4- DEC-6-2006 e9:06A FRO :LONGITUDE 122 LLC PO 4256703365 TO:2067707761 m P.2 -,W.�-H, M—T EDICI-ENGINEERS D'AMATO CONV13RSANO INC. Mt. Raw Woods Poiut Edwards LLC u F Pler 70 z 2801 AlubnWay, Suitic 107 scawtWA98121 51 1pine Sftc4 Ed-nands. Wobingson m c Dan ?& Woods: m 0 0 bst 1--� bs-d to ft-M ft-tbot M'e v'mm appon smice c To 60 Of Ow in gmerd PmcOss, the mrit syxhm ft Pow Emm* Buaft 5 amm 0 'It Omwom"d Prl= am sauctiaal efteral now. We w rAt Owm of Aw OuNaft ffbuolld r m m z tonloncom pl. m otber dm ftW m= —0110004, wc 'dow 4 powida JU left does Wt 3ddmss SAY O&ff Pm9wS Of ffm mutil it 1. todamto" that Dcl linginow even aqwo,"d u� jnVllod for my pwdon affiw succbm C > aW wwlxliy, bas = pmvidad 0 Ifyo, hvo gny pa-ILt. -cd toy fttbar -b— ove 2 cl& 11 X m m 0 0 c CA M 0 z P.B. ew. Drave Mot z -4 Landeoldham 3: U) z 0 0 m RECEIVED DEC BUILDING DEPT pliol loono mE 4vo STamr. SurT9 12 o Raujimm WX98004 46 (425) 827.2238 PAX (4258) 427.8986 S.. n,.. LOG ITEM #-ZdQ— Fireproofing Aggregates Shotcrete Concrete Maso nry A a p h a I I January3, 2007 R o o f I n g P I I I n 9 File No.: 03-284 A.A.R. TESTING S t e a I LABORATORY, IND. S o I I s city of Edmond Building Department W o o d 121 51h Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 REVISED FINAL TO INCLUDE BOTH FOUNDATION AND BUILDING PERMIT NUMBERS z 0 9 Project Point Edwards Building 5 Address: 51 Pine St q -n Permit No: 2005-0869 Foundation --I 2006-0056-Building m C m ro This is to advise you that special inspections are completed o the above referenced p ject The C following inspections were required and copies of all Inspection reports have already been forwarded to you. m jo C > I Reinforced concrete 2. Post tensioned concrete -tendon placing, stressing and elongation 0 -n 3. Structural steel erection -on site welding 4. Inst0ation of holdown system 51 Anchor bolt installation m M 6. Shear wall nailing 0, 7. Diaphragm nailing 0 C 8. Epoxy grouting K 0) m 0 To the best of our knowledge all work inspected conformed to Cfty of Edmonds Building Departinent approved plans, specifications, UBC and related codes and/or verbal or written ;a instructions from the Engineer of Record. z A,A,R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC, z Mmberle Anderson m President RECC- IVEID C C: Point Edwards LLC-Ross Woods JAp,, — t, Longitude 122-Bruce Moe BUILDING Weber & Thompson DEP7. Pearce and Associates Tel: (425) 681-5812 Fax (425) 881-5441 7126 180th Ave. NE P.O. Box 2523 Redmond, WA 98073 1 0G, ITEM #J&Z- r �7� * I zone--.�Lp—1 Comer�—Flag— Setback Front R . red Sides Rear ---N —7— diax M---4af�— SEP-15-2006 FRI 05:53 AM HANSEN FAX NO, 4262350266 P, 01/03 Hansen Surveying LAND SURVEYORS & CONSULTANTS 10402 112-AVE. S.E. RENTON, WASHINOTON 86055 (426)235-8440 Faxi426)235-0266 z 0 0 SWember 15,2006 Point Edwards. LLC m Attn: Bruce Mom 2001 Alaska Way 0 Suite 107 --10 C Santo, WA 98121 Project. (20357) Pointe Edwards Condominium m m Dcar Bruce: Reematlyour fieldcrewam-built the finished flow and top offool'Parapetelovationsof buildingS (31)at PointEdwards. The fasufts ofthese measurements am shown oi% the two attached sketch". 0 n Phase, Coll with any questions. m M Since*, 0 0 Rodney 0. Hanson, P.L.S. m 0 w Z z -4 0j z m RECEIVED SEP 19 2006 BUILDING DEPT. LOG ITEM ........... ------ --- - T.O. PARAPET UPPER ROOF IOW ELEV.= 118.3' T.O. PARAPET MAIN ROOF LOW —-T—T—CEILING MGHER ELEV. 116. B' L—OWER CEIIJNG (Q RESIDENTIAL L LEVEL 3 — LOW- IQEILING 177 - HIGHER P" ELEV.= 103.5' co co . LOWER m 1* I CEILING —2.2'+/— RESIDENTIAL ELEV.= 92.57 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1 — LOW ELEV.= 8Z2' HANSEN SuRvMNG Lu r 17420 11611 AVE S.E. ATION RENTON, WA 18059 ,TEL- 425-235-8440 0 SEP-15-2006 FRI 05:53 AM HANSEN FAX NO, 4252bbO266 T.O. PARAPET UPPER HOOF —HIGH EIEV.- 122.4' T.O. PARAPET MAIN ROOF —HIGH iL—F. V 2 0 6 HIGHER T ILO' CEILING IR wl cElix RESIDENTIAL ZVEL 3—HIGH —I— L ELEV.- 107.4' HIGHER CEILING T to co LOWER f'WTT Twr RESIDENTIAL 2.2'+/— tj LEVEL 2—HIGH ELEV.= 96.5' CEILING RESIDENTIAL/PARICING LML I —HIGH BUILDING 51 WEST END ELEVATION HANSEN SURVEYING 17420 1161' AVE S.E. RENTON, WA 98058 TEL-.425-235-8440 LOG ITEM # _// c 40" 0 c 4 K m m E2 o"n n mm 0 0 H Cl) 0 Page I of I Hard I son, Marie CITY COPY MICROFILM Please find attached a pelf file containing DCI's responses to items 2 and 8 from the plan review comments. A copy of the comments is below. 2. T15e rehfiewmeni used ivithin theflexural length. This rein forcernent has to extend at least the embedment length for the bars, and also has to be enclosed in the circular ties. 8. Tbepiles between Lines 2 and 21. 1 have discussed das issue twice with the engineers and s we still differ on the extent of the pile reinforcement. The engineer was going to discus it one more time with his senior engineers and I said I would accept what they decide assuming; they make their -assumptions known in writing for future information. The basic difference is whether the piles act as columns unstiffened against movement that may occur under a maximum EQ event. Since they are under ground, they could collapse and bring down part of the building even though it may have otherwise resisted the event. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thanks, Jeff D. Brink, P.E. Structural Project Manager 3—E DC I - I �N G, I N I F I'S 10900 N.E. 4th street, suite 1200 - Bellevue, WA 98004 D: 425.818.1710 - P: 425,827.2238 - F: 425.827,8996 Lbr!nk - vmv.dei-engineemcorn Bellevue Everett Spokane Portland San Diego RESU8 SEP 2 0 2005 aUILDING DEPARTMENI CITY OF EDMONDS LOG ITEM #--22�1- 9/21/2005 C z I -n Vi -4 a in In -40 M z > 0, n In in 0 6 Fn z W M 0 z -4 ca z POINT EDWARDS BUILDING #5 Man Review Comment Responses September 21, 2005 FOUNDATION COMMENTS INCLUDING LATERAL LOAD CONSIDERATIONS z 0 Reviewer. City Consultant 4 0 2. The minforeement on S4.2/Detail 9 has been revised. The spiral ties have been length includes extended to a length of 91-0" below the bottom of the pile cap, This 5 1-0" to the point of fixity, per the gootechnical engineer, plus the development length "Mn ofthe longitudinal steel, V) -4 & The piles are not part of the lateral resisting system of the structure and arm not unit X M to prevent movement of the building during a seismic event. Lateral movement is resisted by Frictional forces between the foundationstslabs and the ground. These 0 frictional forcesp vide every high factor of'salcoty against movement, 0 C The piles have bee to nimed per the requirements of the IBC section IS 10- In ' i C addition, as not d in the response to item 2 above, the confinement spiral c length the longitudinal M M ,cintemem'", has been continued the development of ocief—ennZ past h.p.int.ffI-itY- DCI is confident the level of reinforcement provided in the piles is adequate to pmvide stability to the structure during seismic o"o-L -'4 0 -n M M 0 ca M 0 :4 F 7-1 Ln z -4 3: ED z 0 Uj MICROFILM RESUB SEP 22 2005 ug September 22. 2005 S z Ms. Ann Bullis. Assistant Building Official City of Edmonds Development Services Department Building Division 121 Fifth Avenue North Edirionds WA 98020 -i 'n -4 M C RE: Project: Point Edwards, Building 5 51 Pine Street M 0 Project Address: 0 Following. responds to the permit correction notice issued by the City of Edmonds Plan M M Z Review Comment dated Sepleinber 15. 2005: C —4 "'i 1) The accessible route of travel: The structural engineer and the architect have C: addressed the issue of ramping oil Ll for tho residential and parking areas. Please refer to the structural plans for more information. Further details and 0 -n information will be provided in architects. n 2) Tire emission of the gravel and drainage pipes occur only at the downhill sides; M M the free draining gravel, drainage pipes and drainage met are still to be used at 0 the full height basement walls as per the soils engineer's requirements. The 5 Fn details on sheet A9.0 will be amended to more accurately reflect this situation C= (a upon re -submittal for the main building permit commentary corrections notice. M 0 Correspondence from John Sadler at Terra Associates: Z r- The basement (below -grade) walls of the building must be constructed with wall dre inage as recommended fit ourgeotechnical report. I believe for Bidlis 1 through 4, we allowed emission of the footing drain on the daylight side of file building. provided the floor elevation was not below the outside adjacent grade. z 3) The waterproofing board material Iles been replaced with Caltrate additive to the concrete. This has been what was done or) buildings 1 through 4. This will also z be reflected in the details on sheek A9.0 for Building 5. Regards, M Valerie L. Sargent Weber + Thompson Architects 206-244-5700 LOG ITEM MICROFILM LJ saa�l rA51 4r4e") at U TV hit.ct— WEBER+THOMPSON L L C 1-d ... P. January 10, 2006 RESUB z g'.PhIc. Ms. Ann Bullis, Assistant Building Official JAN 10 2006 0 City of Edmonds Development Services Department M Building Division BUILDING DEPARTMEN'T CITY OF EDMONDS Avenue North :;:9 121 Fifth Edmonds WA 98020 0 -40 RE: Point Edwards, Response to Permit Correction #3 for #05-384 0 C Project: Point Edwards, Building 5 -, r. 3: M Project Address: 51 Pine Street M z c: — > issued by the City of Edmonds Following responds to the permit correction notice 0 -n Plan Review Comment dated January 3, 2006: 'n A A Non -Structural Comments: )--"Previous item #8 was not addressed on he noted plans for walls 0 0 C separating dwelling units. m 0 Please see sheet A2.0 and A2.1. and see sheet A8.1 for the wall z assembly. On sheet 10.3 there are no details or notes that specify the blocking z height and location for the swing -up grab bars. This used to be shown on x Sheet A10.2. On Sheet A10.3, notes are only applicable for Type B dwelling units. The Type A unit plans reference sheet At 0.3, however that z sheet has no notes or details for Type A dwelling units. This sheet also -04 does not have accessibility requirements for the common areas. Please 0 m revise. (previous #12 and Occ #5). Please see sheet A10.1 for all Type A unit requirements and A 10. 1 for all Type 8 units. We have also added the blocking notes onto A10.1 and updated the notes on sheets A6.7 and A6.19. General site notes are on sheet A 10.0, these should include any comments applicable to our limited common areas. CITY COPY 425 11.ntius Avenue N Suire 200 Seattle NVA 98109 02063445700 f2067495005 wweb1rth0MPS11X0M LOGITEM# 1 �7 r Ms. Ann Bullis January 6, 2006 Page 2 of 3 M 3. In response to your comment regarding the complying ramps and accessibility of all floors, please have the architect of record provide a written code analysis/justification for our review to support the design and statements in your response letter. (previous MOE 118). 0 M Where we provide Type 'A' units on the East end of building 5, we provide elevator service for all common areas with the double stop Type 'A' =i Fft elevator. In this way a wheelchair from either unit can a m access the common areas: the lobby, the bridge, the trash chute, the C garage and the storage units on L1. The IBC 2003 Section 1104.4 m 0 80 code allows elevators to be the accessible route of travel. C The commentary from IBC2003, page 11-11 goes on to say., M m "At least one accessible route is required between levels in a facility. This C: requirement does not mandate an elevator. The accessible route betwe > C levels can be via ramp g, platform lifts Lwhere permitted), limited usellimited access (LULAI elevators, passenger elevators,. etc The intent of the be inaccessible without restricting 0"" exceptions is to allow limited areas to C access to services available to the general public." (emphasis added) m m From the West end of the building we also provide an accessible 0, 0 m route of travel from the main entry point of the building, which is our C Co C 0) parking garage. Both elevators are fully accessible from anywhere in 0 the garage or the residential portion of L 1 via ramps. However, we do acknowledge that access from a Type 'B' unit on the West end to other portions of the building (i.e. lobby) are not convenient. ff a person who resided in the building were temporarily in a wheelchair > they would simply take the elevator to their floor no matter where the z unit was located as the L 1 is fully accessible. However, H a person on level L2 or L3 on the West end were receiving a visitor in a Co z wheelchair and wanted to use the lobby, the person would have to 9 use the East elevator #1 from the lobby to Ll to access the West end F) elevator #2 only for those 13 units specifically serviced by that m elevator. However, specific signage will provided at the main lobby entrance and at the elevators as to elevator number, site location and what units may be accessed by which elevator. Site maps will also be provided at main lobby and elevator lobbies. Ms. Ann Buills January 6, 2006 Page 3 of 3 4,"Revise details 1 & 4 on Sheet A7.0 to show ramps rather than stairs and z reflect the changes made to the floor plans. Please see Sheet A 7 0. 0 q o"cross reference new corridor ramp details shown on sheets A7.3 on the IT floor plans. Please see Sheet A2.0, A2.1 and A 7.3. 6r Since this is a V-A building: M C We have revised all details to reflect the 1-hour rated assembly as m 0 -40 required on Sheets A8.1 and added the roof assembly detail. 0 C 4 The roof must be 1-hour rated. On Detail FBIA8.1, proved and X m z refemce the listed and tested 1 hour assembly and specifically note all requirements of the assembly on the plans, Please see sheet A8. 1. )eThe decks must be 1-hour rated. on Detail FWAU, provide and 0 reference the listed and tested 1-hour rating and including listed and tested assembly reference. Please see sheet A8. 1. X M M Revise detail F4/A8.1 to a 1 -hour rating and including listed and a 5i tested assembly reference. Please see sheet A8. 1. 0 0 All beams and columns supporting a floor and roof or more than C CD one floor must be individually protected to 1 -hour construction M 0 Z Ali beams and columns supports are all enclosed within floor or wall assemblies that are rated 1-hour, the one exception being the concrete columns on L1 which is non-combustible -4 construction. z If you have any additional questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. A X Co z Regards, REGIStERED APZHnM 0 m Blain . We r, Principal er + mpson PLLC BLAWE J. WEBER 6- -5700 FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM TO:K;� DATE: T-7- MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE _ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE -PLANNING DIVISION DATE PROJECT SITEADDRESS PERMIT #1&,X�V�ADB# DATE INSPECTED DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED A field inspection was conducted to determine compliance with approved plans. Final approval denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of: GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED 0 Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES 0 Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inpector I 2. 3. RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL Date Signature 1:temp:b1dg:fbrms:ocaprv1 3/25/04 z Fn --I 0 x c: M M 0 __40 00 C M M z o -n n mm 0 0 0 M a ca 9(f) M 0 Z z 0) z 9 0 M FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM TO: DATE:4*7 MEMOTO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION DEPARTMENT DATE2��-v:)7 FROM: N ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE z 0 PLANNING DIVISION DATE 0 M P s —7/0, --i -n PROJECT .... . ......... . .... V5 orn C SITE ADDRESS rn 0 -40 PERMIT #dodl INSPECTED 00 C -i i: M _DATE M M i DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED 0 C > A field inspection was conducted to determine compliance w�/.pproved plans. Final approval 65 denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of o -n PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of T 0 CO FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL r- M (n _.�S_GRANT M 0 Z r- 71 GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED z 0 Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector --i a: I Cl) z 0 FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES 0 M 0 Copy ofCORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inpector I 2. 3. RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL Date Signatur I:temp:b1dg:forms:ocaprv1 3/25/04 Cyt? of &MOUN DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS t of PER International Building Code Section 110 At: 51 Pine St., Edmonds, WA, Building Permit BLDi0060056 No. Stories; Occupancy established by this certificate: Dwelling Units: -4 3 R21S2 Typ prink, Basement: No .4,2roonstruction: VA S **4 (Per IBC 1004) Maximum Occupant �oacl Room capacity signs, wfiyr t remain posted at a// times. v 1 Owner of Building: Point Edwards LLQ, �jtllresa: AV,. 61to lot, Ssattle. WA 98121 THE Point Edwards 41 Unit Condo �"..�H.$BEEWNSPECTEDANO APPROVED AS'COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2003 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING.4ZOQE AS ADOPTED, BY',TkE CITY FOR THE GROUP AND DIVISION OF OCCUPANCY AND THE USE FOR WHICH THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY IS CLASSIFIED. Issued this 23rd day of JangarV 2007 CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL -6- BY:- This Centhoue, shall be Posted In a conspicuous public ane and shelf not be ha—ed, lhutilated orobaccend and shall b..PjhPpJlM1.-n legible conditl—tall a-.. p I IS W 6 0", is r Pit: Permit Inspection Details Permit: BLD20060056 PERMIT!- 1077 - E-Englineering Final c omplete?_ 12120/2006 ChIl.man 30 FINAUED-StGNED OFF y Total Time: 30 1106 - B-Setbacks complete? "Y' 12128/2005 Snook 20 APPROVED PER SURVEYOR OF RECORD y Total Time: 20 1168,- B-Footings ComplateT y 12/08/2006 Snook 20 APPROVED BY SPECIAL INSPECTOR-A�A.R� TESTING LABORATORY Y Total Time: 20 1110 � B-Foundation Waft. Complete?.' Y: 12/0W2006 Snook 20 APPROVED BY SPECIAL INSPECTOR.A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY Total Time: 20 I ljo � 9-plumb.Ground Work complete?, 121221 1 20 . 05 Snook 30 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING AT THE WEST SECTION APPROVED N 12/2812005 Snook 30 UNDERGROUND STORM AND SANITARY AT SOUTH EAST SECTION APPROVED. N OV2612006 Snook 45 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING AT CENTER AREA APPROVED N 02/2312006 Snook 45 APPROVED Y Total Time: 150 jjj6�a4pjurri6Roughlnr' complete,?, 65110i2006 Snook 45 CORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN 05/1612006 Snook 30 ROUGH -IN PLUMBING AT THE EAST SIDE ALL FLOORS APPROVED EXCEPT FOR N ISLAND SINKS ON THE 2ND AND 3RD FLOORS. o5/30/2006 Snook 30 CORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN N 05/31/2006 Snook 30 ROUGH IN PLUMBING AT UNITS 213-217 APPROVED. N 0610512006 Snook 45 ROUGH -IN PLUMBING AT UNITS 312-316 APPROVED. N 06/15/2006 Snook 45 ROUGH -IN PLUMBING AT CENTER SECTION, FLOORS 1 THRU 3 APPROVED, N 07111/2006 Snook 45 ROUGH -IN PLUMBING AT WEST SECTION, FLOORS 1 THRU 3 APPROVED. N 07119/2006 Snook 45 APPROVED Y Total Time: 315 complete 6S;�'Ji�666 Snook 45 GAS TEST/PIPING AT EAST SECTION, FLOORS I TO 3, APPROVED IN o8/0112006 Snook 46 REMAINDER OF GAS PIPING APPROVED Y Total Time: 90 1136 � Bot4ulpateni-Mech complete,? owiw�m Snook 4 5 MECHANICAL APPROVED AT UNITS 106,107, AND 108. N 06/05/2006 Snook 45 MECHANICAL APPROVED AT UNITS 312 THRU 316. N 0611612006 Snook 60 MECHANICAL APPROVED AT UNITS 104 AND 105. N MECHANICAL APPROVED AT UNITS 213 THRU 217. 06/2712006 Snook 60 MECHANICAL APPROVED AT UNITS 101, 102.103,201, 202,203,204 THRU 210, AND N 06130/2006 Snook 304 THRU 310. 45 MECHANICAL APPROVED AT UNITS 301, 302, 303, AND 311 y Total Time: 255 i �i - 6.tExterlor sheathing Complete? Y, 1 1 2/08 /2006 Snook 20 APPROVED BY SPECIAL INSPECTOR-A.A.R, TESTING LABORATORY Y Total Time: 20 1134 - B.E)(terior Gypsurn Sheathing, Complete? Y 12108�2066 Sno I ok 2 1 0 APPROVED - BY SPECIAL INSPECTOR-A,A�R. TESTING LABORATORY Y Total Time: 20 1140 - B-Heigbt Verification Complete? y 6/9120091:32:50PM Page I of 3 r 12/19/2006 Snook 20 APPROVED PER SURVEYOR OF RECORD SUBMITTED DETAIL/HEIGHT SURVEY. Y Total Time: 2 1142 -S�Framlnfg., Complete? Y 0411612006 Snook 45 FRAMING AT IST FLOOR FIREPLACES APPROVED. N 05/09/2006 Snook 60 FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING APPROVED AT 2ND FLOOR EAST CORRIDOR AND N 1 ST FLOOR EAST CORRIDOR, GARAGE SIDE. FIRE CAULKING AT EAST SIDE IST AND 2ND FLOOR FIRE PLACES, 0511812006 Snook 90 FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING APPROVED AT UNITS 106,107, AND 108. N FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING EAST HALLWAY TO ELEVATOR AND STORAGE ROOMS APPROVED. C ORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN TO OBTAIN MECHANICAL PERMITS FOR GAS FIREPLACES. 05/26/2006 Snook 40 FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING AT INTERIOR SHEARWALLS IN UNITS 213 AND 217 N APPROVED. z 0 0513012006 Snook 60 FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING APPROVED FOR UNITS 213 THRU 217. N FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING AT 2ND FLOOR CORRIDOR, CENTER SECTION, APPROVED. 06/05/2006 Snook 60 FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING APPROVED AT UNITS 312 THRU 316. IN 0611612006 Snook 60 DROP DOWN LID FRAMING APPROVED AT UNITS 213 THRU 217. N FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING AT UNITS 104 AND 105 APPROVED. 0612212006 Snook 90 FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING APPROVED AT UNITS 201, 202,203,211, AND 212 N APPROVED� m FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING AT EAST STAIRWAY APPROVED, Cl 06/27/2006 Snook 90 FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING AT 3RD FLOOR CORRIDOR. CENTER SECTION, N 0 -40 APPROVED. FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING AT ELEVATOR #2 SHAFT APPROVED. c -4 r. Y FRAM NO AND F RE CAULKING AT FIRE PLACES FOR UNITS 204 THRU 210,101,102, X M 103, AND 304THRU 310APPROVED. M Z claw/2006 Snook 60 FRAMINGAND FIRECAULKING, APPROVED AT UNITS 301,302,303,310. AND 311. N c) -4 c —z 07/11/2006 Snook 60 FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING APPROVED AT UNITS 101, 102, AND 103. N > -4 WROTE CORRECTION FOR SAFETY GLAZING REQUIRED AT WINDOW NEXT TO PATIO CORR OF UNIT 102 REQUIRED. WILL BE CHECKED AT FINAL INSPECTION. 07/1112006 Snook 90 FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING AT WEST SIDE, 2ND FLOOR DWELLING UNITS IN 0 n APPROVED� FRAMING, FIRE CAULKING AND DROP DOWN LID FRAMING APPROVED AT WEST -n AND CENTER CORRIDORS. 07/2812006 Snook 90 FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING APPROVED AT UNITS 303,304,305,306.308, AND 309. N in rn FRAMING AND FIRE CAULKING APPROVED AT WEST SECTION CORRIDOR, 3RD a FLOOR. WROTE CORRECTION FOR SAFETY GLAZING REQUIREMENS AT UNITS 304 AND 309. 0 0 c WILL CHECK AT FINAL INSPECTION. c 08/16/2006 Snook 30 DROP DOWN LID FRAMING APPROVED AT WEST SIDE, 2ND FLOOR DWELLING Y M 0 UNITS. Z Total Time; 925 7-1 1144�.�B-Wall�iiistil.ation/,Cauix-. 04116/2006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT FIRE PLACES ON I ST FLOOR. N 05118/2006 Snook 60 INSULATION APPROVED AT UNITS 106,107, AND 108, IN z INSULATION APPROVED AT EAST CORRIDOR TO ELEVATOR. AND AT STORAGE -4 ROOMS. 3: 05131/2006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT UNITS 213 THRU 217. N ra 061161200C Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT UNITS 213 THRU 217, AND UNITS 104 AND 105. N z 9 0612212006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT EAST STAIRWAY, N 06127/2006 Snook 60 INSULATION APPROVED AT 3RD FLOOR CENTER CORRIDOR. IN 0 m APPROVED AT UNITS 201, 202. 203. 211, AND 212. INSULATION NSULAT ON APPROVED AT ELEVATOR #2. INSULATION APPROVED AT FIREPLACES FOR UNITS 204 THRU 210,101,102,103, AND 304 THRU 310. 06130/2006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT UNITS 301, 302,303, AND 311. N 0711112006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT UNITS 101, 102, AND 101 N 07119/2006 Snook 60 S ULATION APPROVED AT WEST SECTION, 2ND FLOOR DWELLING UNITS. N IN NSULATION APPROVED AT ALL WEST AND CENTER SECTION CORRIDORS. 0712812006 Snook 45 APPROVED AT UNITS 303, 304, 305,306. 308, AND 309. N INSULATION NSULAT ON APPROVED AT WEST SECTION, 3RD FLOOR CORRIDOR. 08116/2006 Snook 45 INSULATION FOR REMAINDER OF BUILDING APPROVED, Y Total Time! 450 619/2009 1:32:50 PM Page 2 of 3 1148-B-Cellinginsulation/Caitilk iz"�, ccimplete?�:" 2':� 04/1612006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT FIREPLACES ON 1STFLOOR. N 0511812006 Snook 60 INSULATION APPROVED AT UNITS 106,107, AND 108. N INSULATION APPROVED AT EAST CORRIDOR TO ELEVATOR, AND AT STORAGE ROOM& 05/31/2006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT UNITS 213 THRU 217. N 0611612006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT UNITS 213 THRU 217. AND UNITS 104 AND 105 N 06/22/2006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT EAST STAIRWAY. N 06/2712006 Snook 60 INSULATION APPROVED AT 3RD FLOOR CENTER CORRIDOR� N APPROVED AT UNITS 201. 202.203.211, AND 212. INSULATION NSULATION APPROVED AT ELEVATOR #2. INSULATION APPROVED AT FIREPLACES FOR UNITS 204 THRU 210,101.102,103, AND 304 THRU 310. 0613012006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT UNITS 301, 302,303, AND 311. N 07/11/2006 Snook 30 INSULATION APPROVED AT UNITS 101, 102, AND 103. N 07119/2006 Snook 60 INSULATION APPROVED AT WEST SECTION. 2ND FLOOR DWELLING UNITS, N INSULAT:ON APPROVED AT ALL WEST AND CENTER SECTION CORRIDORS. 0712812006 Snook 45 ON APPROVED AT UNITS 303,304, 305, 306, 308, AND 309. N INSULAT NSULAT�ON APPROVED AT WEST SECTION, 3RD FLOOR CORRIDOR OBM6/2006 Snook 45 INSULAT ON FOR REMAINDER OF BUILDING APPROVED. y Total Time: 450 v 1.160 - '�6 PRE -ROCK APPROVED AT FIREPLACES IST AND 2ND FLO N 05/0912006 0513012006 Snook Snook 45 PRE -ROCK AT 2ND FLOOR CORRIDOR LID, CENTER SECTION APPROVED. N SHEETROCK APPROVED AT UNITS 106,107, AND 108. 06/1612006 Snook 45 SHEETROCK APPROVED AT UNITS 213 THRU 217. N 06/16/2006 Snook 45 SHEETROCK AT DROP DOWN LIDS APPROVED AT UNITS 213 THRU 217. N 06/2712006 Snook 45 SHEETROCK APPROVED AT UNITS 101 THRU 105. N 07/11/2006 Snook 45 SHEETROCK APPROVED AT UNITS 301, 302, 303,310, AND 311 N 07119/2006 Snook 30 SHEETROCK AT CORRIDORS. WEST AND CENTER SECTION, 2ND FLOOR N 08/1612006 Snook APPROVED. 60 SHEETROCK AT 2ND FLOOR APPROVED, N 0912112006 Snook 60 SHETROCK AT 3RD FLOOR APPROVED, y Total Time: 420 I -it qqf1na;;' 12ti3/2006 Snook 60 CORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN N 01/23/2007 Snook 40 APPROVED y Total Time; 100 M ina,�' 12/1360� Snook 60 CORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN N 01/2312007 Snook 40 APPROVED Y Total Time: 100 60 CORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN N 12113/2006 01/23/2007 Snook Snook 40 APPROVED y Total Time: 100 77 Total Time: 3505 Page 3 of 3 r RECORD OF INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED SETBACKS ..................... -,98 —zS e-SA FOUNDATION: �N I f Footing ...................... wall ........... z Pier/Porch ................. 0 Retaining Wall m Slab Insulation .......... -i 'n PLUMBING: -4 -a3-c�f am Underground ............. a IT, 0 0 Rough -in ... ............ 0 a Commercial Final m m z HEATING: Q z Gas Test .............. 'Gas Piping 0 n Equipment ........... Commercial Final m M EXTERIOR SHEATHING 0 r- 0 IT NAILING .......................... 0) Y� oLf, Cn FRAMING ........................ 0 z FIRST FLOOR FRAMING INSULATION ................... Floor Insulation z Wall Insulation ........... 3: co Ceiling Insulation z SHEETROCK NAILING 0 m SPECIAL INSPECTION MISCELLANEOUS .......... FINAL APPROVAL FOR OCCUPANCY .................. $&sow# DW* wdwmdwsiw AMOWIPW Pt DdeP0fCbN0d_---- A..vMPWd$___ReMP1#- Datetwu V.--EXPIres.�