20060207.pdfeWGINCIERING
1`4ELD OBSERVATION REPORT
Project: Field Representatives:
Stensland Residence Remodel Chrs Bernards P.E.
Job No.: 05181.10
Report No. I
Date: April 9, 2006
Location:
Purpose of Site Visit:
8807 201 " Place SW
Observe the general construction progress
Edmonds, WA 98026
Client:
General Contractor
Chermak Construction
Chermak Construction
�NARRATIVE
On April 6t", CG Engineering performed a site observation of the construction for the
Stensland Residence in Edmonds, WA. The primary goal of the site visit was to observe
the Construction progress as well as check for general conformance with the approved
construction drawings. The following issues were discussed vvith the contractor.
FZECEIVED
1. At tie east end of the 63/." glularn beam, there is not adequate length to install the
APR 1 2006 4'strap as shown on 21S2.1. The contractor shall instal a CS16 strap from the
notched portion of the glularn to the rough opening approximately 3'away. The
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. contractor shall also add a 4' CSI 6 strap centered at the beam above this
CITY OF EDMONDS opening. In both cases, the strap shall be nailed to added blocking between studs.
2. The east end of the 6/."giLlam beam did not have a holdown installed horizontally
to the perpendicular wall as shown in 9/S2. 1. The contractor shall install this strap
to the 2x12 adjacent to the shear wall and nail the 2x12 to blocking between each
stud with 16d nails at 4" o.c. Install (I) -Simpson A35 each sice of each wall stud to
attach the wall StLds to the 2xI 2. These should be staggered an the stud top and
bottom of the 2x1 2.
3. The crpple wall above the concrete wall does not allow for the installation of a
PHD5 per 2/S2.1. The contractor may install afternate holdown straps as shown in
the attached sketch, SS-3.
4. The east end of the existing floor beam bears an the concrete wall further away
then originally thought. The contractor will attach a P.T. 6x6 post to the concrete
wall to help support this beam. The pos*, shall attach to the wall with (4)-equally
spaced 519'diameter anchor bolts embed 4" into the wall with Hilti HIT HY 150
epoxy or equal.
The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on what was observable
at the time of the site visit. If conditions appear significantly different than those
described above, please contact us immediately for further review. This observation is
250 An Ave. South not a sufficient substitutiol for the inspection requirements shown on S1.0.
Please feel free to call if you have any questions or concerns or to, more information or
Eilmorlds,WASS02D the observations and recommendatiors above.
Phore. 425.778,8500
Fax: 425.77B.562%
Z
0
0
m
-i m
C
M
0
80
C
--i
Im
0 m
n
M m
U CO
0,
0
C
M Co
Q 0
Zq In
Z
CA
Z
0
m
j)r5L rrvo e R-_p—A), V1 -PAIJft
&066-filrowli(p P&A- Ft�,M IUDIZ- i
N -C
OT -H PLINVOo At A44QD ForL
tW-TALL"ON
.Pw, le p qw Ai�". W�TD, C -
I
(,TT-131, M, 1,:IT;040
�:Pm
jtrtW�lio TD Oi3L 2x, STUD .
IN wp PPM0 s 04� h4Afsl .
Ikm Wku�, W/ t"un, HIT Ra /P
EPOYP� OR.. 6�WAI-
2-372
�Aotpowtj ALWO(T6 Dt-7-AIL,
By CAS
D
Che
t,
84GINC-EFUNG
swe
ot No.
250 4thAve. South
Suite 200
P-j-
M
sTefisLAM
Job No.
Edmonds,WA98020
CF:1181 1 10
z
0
m
m
-q 0
0 0
-4 C
m
M
0 n
n
m M
0
0
C:
M 0
X
>
z
z
0
m
Project:
Stenslanc Residence Remodel
Field Representatives,
Chris Bernards P.E,
Job No.: 05181,10
ReportNo.2
Date: April 10", 2006
L*cation:
Purpose of Site Visit:
8807 201 " Place S.W.
Holdown Epoxy Anchor Bolt Installation
Edmonds, WA 98026
Client;
General Contractor:
0
Chermak Construction
Chermak.Construction
V
'ARRXTIVE"'
3:
r"
On April Id", CG Engineering performed a site observation of the construction for the
m 0
-40
Stensland Residence in Edmonds, WA, The primary goal of the site visit was to observe
0 C k"
t�e holdown epoxy bolt Installation for general conformance with the approved
construction drawings. The following items summarize our findings:
m
m Z
. Simpson Set-Pac Epoxy used (acceptable alternate to Hilt! HIT HY 150)
>
. Hole diameter was 1/."
r-
. Hole depth was 7'
. 516' diameter threaded expansion anchors were used
0 -n
n
. Ho,es were properly cleaned prior to installation
M M
The anchors appeared to be installed in accordance with the manufacturer
0
recommendations and Instructions.
0
C)
The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on what was observable
C
M 0
atthe time ofthesite visit. If conditions appear significantly different than those
-
described above, please contact us immediately for further review.
M
J.
Please feel free to call :f you have any ques�ions or concerns or for rnore information on
the observations and recommendations above.
z
0
In
ospe'd, Ate,
8"0
QPZ04' vice,
2504thAve. South
0)z
SUb 200
EdmoridsWA911020
Phorw.425.778.8500
Fa)c 425778 6536
05L 57VO 8 ROL.PcxuA) W1 PAIJft
P&A- FL4-6 NoTZ- i
NDrc-m PLIw000 At R&CID Rf-�_
$Axpsof-i MsTc/,�5 Op-
IAST-�77 T-V,AL!6N -sJ/
.Pwoqwlj� ItJTD COW-1
-SM-A34N, I-TT.i.'31 A LTT;08
:Z-NTdZ- 41 '01
JTTV"m 'TT) OPL �tx STUD
IpJ L.1�� oF P'Hl> S ON. PL+Vl..
&MG6,9 %* It AtJtMDP- 6' MIA).
v�j-o 'WICUL� to/ 11tL71 HIT kL4 lEb
COMIC. -ALL
Isr
Ira
------------ 7
716
"'0- �40LPOw&j "RJitT6 W-AlL, "Y CAS
Ch�ckelcLc, Du, (&la
Sol. shcet No.
250 4th Ave. South Job No.
Suite 200 Pmj
Bdmonds,WA98020 CF7181, 10
z
0
m
c
MO
--10
0 c
m m
0
X r rn
m
m
MR rn
—c*
0
0 Fn
c (1)
m
z 0
;a
z
z
0
m
CITY OF EDMONL)b MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS. WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: —dedmonds—us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
April 14, 2006
Z
Jeanne Stensland
8807 201" PI SW
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: Building Permit: 2006-0207
Site Address: 8807 201" PI SW m
Expiration Date: 03/17/07 m 0
0
Dear Jeanne Stensland,
m
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the last remaining inspection on your
project is a final inspection(s). The final inspection(s) determines that there are no
outstanding life -safety issues and approval allows the City to close your permit file.
-n
The City considers the final inspection to be one of the most important inspections
:41
ra
conducted on a project. In order to grant final approval the following must be complete: C
m M
smoke detectors, house numbers, guardrails, handrails, self -close doors between garage a V;
0
and residence, egress from sleeping rooms, safety glazing, weather-stripping, any . r-
Engineering department requirements etc. Ofcourse not all ofthese things may C.:
specifically apply to your project but it does give you an idea about the kinds of things
that must be complete as well as some items that do not need to be installed such as:
paint, carpet, moldings, wallpaper, etc. Please be advised permits expire one year from X
the date of issuance. If you will need more time to complete the work, pennaits can be
renewed prior to expiration for one half fees. Ifthe pennit expires without a final
approval granted by the Building Inspector, full fees are required in order to renew the
permit. This can be very costly to you and we strongly encourage you to check your FO
permit expiration date and call for the required final inspection(s). Note: If more than Z
one department is required to final your project, this is noted on your Job Card. 0
m
Please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220 if you have any questions.
�SinccrclZ
J ul.ur
P.jSp ci.li.
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
Project:
Field Representatives,
Stenstand Residence Remodel
Chris Bernards P.E.
i464
Job No.: 05181.10
Report No. 2
Date: April 10, 2006
Location:
Purpose of Site Visit:
8807 201 "Place S.W.
Holdown Epoxy Anchor Solt Installation
Edmonds, WA 98026
Client:
General Contractor;
Chennak Construction
Chermak Construction
Z
0
M
95
'1AAR �Tl
m
On April 10", CG Engineering performed a site observation of the construction forthe
M 0
0
Stensland Residence In Edmonds, WA. The primary goal of the site visit was to observe
C
the holdown epoxy bolt installation for general conformance with the approved
C
m
construction drawings. The following items summarize our findings:
. Simpson Set-Pac Epoxy used (acceptable alternate to Hilt! HIT HY 160)
C
11, Z
C:J
. Hole diameter was 3/7
. Hole depth was r
:�
O"a
S diameter threaded expansion anchors were used
-n
Holes were properly cleaned prior to installation
rn M
The anchors appeared to be installed in accordance with the manufacturer
055
0 r-
recommendations and instructions.
001
The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based an what was observable
M 0
at the time of the site visit. If conditions appear significantly different then those
described above, please contact us immediately for further review,
Please feel free to call if you have any questions or concerns or for more information on
the observations and recommendations above.
Z
Z
0
m
RECEIVED
JUN 2 9 2006
OEVELO�MENT SERVICEs CTR,
2604thAve. South
Stda 200
Ednmd%WA9BO2D
Plione:425.178,8M
Fax 425.778,5536
3
ENGINEIERING
FIELD -OBSERVATION REPORT
Project:
Field Representatives:
Stensland Residence Remodel
Chris Bemards P.E.
05181.10
-JobNo.:
Report N .11
Date: April e, 2006
Location:
Purpose of Site Visit:
8807 201" Place SW
Observe the general construction progress
Edmonds, WA 98026
Client:
General Contractor -1
Chermak Construction
Chermak Construction
-NARRATIVE
On April 6"', CG Engineering performed a site observation of the Construction for the
Stensland Residence in Edmonds, WA. The primary goal of the site visit was to observe
the construction progress as well as check for general conformance with the approved
construction drawings. The following issues were discussed with the contractor.
I . At the east end of the 63/." glularn beam, there is not adequate length to install the
4'strap as shown on 21S2.1. The contractor shall install a CS16 strap from the
notched portion of the glularn to the rough opening approximately Taway. The
contractor shall also add a 4' CSI 6 strap centered at the beam above this
opening. In both cases, the strap shall be nailed to added blocking between studs.
2. The east end of the 6Y."glulam beam did not have a hotdown installed horizontally
to the perpendicular wall as shown in 9/S2A. The contractor shall Install this strap
RECEIVED to the 2xi 2 adjacent to the shear wall and nail the 2xI2 to blocking between each
stud with 16d nails at 4" D.C. Install (I) -Simpson A35 each side of each wall stud to
attach the wall studs to the 2xl 2. These should be staggered on the stud top and
JUN 2 9 2006 bottom of the 2xI 2.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR,
CITY OF EDMONDS 3. The cripple wall above the concrete wall does not allow for the installation of a
PHD5 per VS21. The contractor may install alternate holdown, straps as shown In
250 4th Ave. South
&&2110
EdmorlidSMA91302111
Phone:425.77&M
Fax: 425,778M
the attached sketch, SS-3.
4, The east end of the existing floor beam bears an the concrete wall further away
then originally thought. The contractor will attach a P.T. 6x6 post to the concrete
wall to help support this beam. The post shall attach to the wall with (4�-eqluslly
spared 5/ir diameter anchor bolts embed 4" into the wall with Hilb HIT HY 150
epoxy or equal.
The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on what was observable
at the time of the sitevisit. If conditions appear significantly different then those
described above, please contact us immediately for further review. This observation is
not a sufficient substitution for the inspection requirements shown on S1.0.
Please feel free to call if you have any questions or concerns or for more information on
the observations and recommendations above.
Z
9
0
0
0
C
M
3i
Z
co
0 -n
m Im
a 5
0
0
C
Im 0
X
Z
9
0
Im
Permit Inspection Details
Permit: BLD20060207
P E R M I T
h
r,S eat ng'
0411tf�005 W EXTERIOR SHEATHING APPROVED
y
Total Tim.: 20
K; ri;
c
04111/2006 MS 20 FRAMING APPROVED
y
Total Time: 20
111' t 6 1
1144"-s4a ns6la I iniciu k : �:111�11' "
�c fife?
z
0411212006 MS 15 INS ULATIONAPPROVED
y
0
Total Time: Is
Floo, [On
1146 a. rd sulat' 'Ik'
Au
�I�: Com elte?.T,
M
04/1212006' �MS M�'; INSULATION APPROVE'D'
y
—
Total Time: 20
-4 -n
ee, ck
M
SAE
04/13/2006 JR 20 ETROCK APPROVED
y
M C
Total Time: 20
t
0
APPROVED
y
3:
06/2612006 fvl� 15 FINAL
M
M z
Total Time: 15
jo -q
It
Total Inspections:
6 Total Time: 110
E: :J
0 -n
M M
0
0
C/)
Q C)
z
t,
z
0
M
7/8/2009 8:47:44 AM
Page I of I
7�
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED
SETBACKS .....................
FOUNDATION:
Footing ......................
Wall ...............
Pier/Porch .................
z
Retaining Wall
Stab Insulation ..........
0
PLUMBING:
Underground .............
Rough -in
M
C
...............
M
-4 0
Commercial Final
0
0
HEATING:
C
M
M z
Gas Test ....................
C) -4
C
Gas Piping .................
>
r- -4
Equipment
0 "TI
Commercial Final
3:
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
M M
NAILING ..........................
4
15 J
0
0
FRAMING ........................
co
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING
M 0
Z
INSULATION ..........
Floor Insulation
Wall Insulation ...........
Ceiling Insulation
NAILING
z
SHEETROCK
SPECIAL INSPECTION
0
M
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
OCCUPANCY .................
7 P7
M