20060256.pdf=I-3
PERMIT EXPIRE
PERMIT
CITY OF EDMONDS NUMBER
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION .a ...
OWNER NAMrEaUSINE�� ",con Tid bo+ SUM
MAILING ADDRESS
-T73-tk-o'—(ZQ
PLNr NAMF-SUBDIVISION NO LOT No LID NO,
LID 1. 1
PUBLIC NIGHT OF WAY PER O-GtAL STREET MAP
�zlp JISLSPIONE
&1-Z 4-zs ---7*7i-o-,-,o-s
E.ISTI.G PROPOSED
DEDICATION IT
Z� C<-
','E I LINE SIIE I NO, 01 Ic(TORES 'RV REQUIRED
lEs 13 No 11
ADDRES
6 2-0 Vj /�-Z' 4 Co
"MARKS
SIGN CONTRO N E
OWNERDONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE 1
(�,DRA,IA7G
cn, r- A/ C'-
&:F-A tbt-
H �V' r
ENrIN EAIaGRE1'iE"% DATE
sh (bb"" (6'�v -
S
BY DATE
AD BESS
(C I S
2R)
RECYCLERE EWE
. T
REVIEWED By DATE
o
CITY ZIP
23
TELEIN HE
H N
q 7-
PUBLIC W6RKS
z
0
FINEFEWE.S..Y -7�—TE
T
STATE Ll ENSE NUMBER EXPIRA ICN,5_��
O(A (5, (!� W�10
VARIANCE OR cu ----LINEORADB# INSPECPON BE-
RED D
0 YES IM NO
YES
SIGN AREA HI -I
0 -bEG ALU.- AF---
AU. -
1A I .
m
C
MO
--4 0
00
C
--I r.
3: In
m
RTY ACCOUNTP RCELNO.
P PbFER�TAX
0 14400nr)Q5
po�-W
NEW ",_BS.I.E 'J;t PLUMBING I MECH
ERIC
Co.. NN: 7—c PLtANCE OR
'0--G1TK)N CHANGE OF USE
D� rj MIXEDUSE
REMODEL
E] U111A." SIGN
E3GY.S PENCE
REPA X ITT
REPAIR
OTHER
0 DEMOLISH TANK
LOTCOVERAGE
A�WED PROPO4
REQUIRED SETBACK$ (FT)
FRONT SIDE BEAR
PROPOS %T�IA
PENT I E R�AR'I
wisa
PARKING LOT
REDID I PRO I.E.
'7" 'lu
AREA
oo
PLANNING R!VIEWED BY . DATE
j47446 ";'112A
;n�'& C>3 1 (Af
C)
SGARAGE R NWG WALL 0 11 ,�E ALP�R�I NILER
'2RT RETAI
11
LOCKERY
OF S�' BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPI.Aft
g
I:1Y) -A"D1.11-
cO
0 -n
m ITT
00 'U-5
0 m
0)
a)
ITT 0
Z r-
93
;13
z
z
0
0
NUMBER I
soT"D 'Es 12
-U-.ER .1
DWELLING
TYPE OF CON U H N
CODE
1 G&.GJ1A.T
UP
E C ISE OR TO BED
nq pono,
sPECIALINSPECTION
REQUIRE. 13 YES
C NSULTA.T
OCCUPANT
LOAD
-72 t" IS4
REMARKS
REPORT
nl--PfYM 4rl�Aj
GEOTECH
BY
C RA Lr,6yj 0
'� 3 4-3&
Descriptloh
FEE
Description
FEE
Plan Check 12
3 1
State Surcharge
4�
HEAT SOURCE IESTID DATE
Building PerMit
City Surcharge
PLAN CHECK NO:
-0-0
Plumbing
--Be Fee
m
THIS PERMIT AUTHOR12bES ONLYTHE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY, ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS. DRIVE.S, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Mechanical
/
Grading
PERMIT AIPLICATIOM SEE ECDC 11-1111AIII)
PERMIT LIMIT.� SEE ECDC 19.00-5(A)16),
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
E,g,. Review Recording Fee
Eng, inspection 7,,,n Plan Chk.. Deposit
'AP LICANT, ON BEHAL OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, AS SIGNS AND SUCC SSORS
P T SS THE CITY OF
INT EREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY ' DEF No AND HOLD HARMLE
2 EDMN ONDS. WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
EVE NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR NDIRECTLY
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHAT I I or BE
m FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT $HALL N
_I BE To MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY OREHNA C
a EMED
0 N T IN ANY WAY TH S A51LITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION. -
OR LIMI E CITY
Fire Review Receipt N
—T-i Arnil
Fire InSpeCfiCT Arni Due
L
tHEREBYACK OWL DGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS GoRNEGT�E
THE OWNER, IRAGREAND THAT I A. THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
E To COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC
TION PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
to
IN Vj.oALND IN DOING THE WORKAL9HORIZED THEREBY, NO WASHINGTON RELATING TO
ATI.N THE L BE OF HE STATE OF
I om 0 SURANCE AND RCW 1&27.
WORKMEN DATE $IJED
APPLICATION A
CALL �q,Vb by Ib.
DVp,b, VbbJ F-1 p-
FOR INSPECTION lo"""'
1 Ap- P'.
LS SIGN HE ATE
(425)
za NO
771-0220 BED Y ATE
':-) b
EXT. 1333
ENTION
ITIS UNLAWFULTO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI. ORIGINAL E - YELLOW -INSPECTOR
FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC1091 IBC110 I IRC110- PINK -OWNCR - GOLD , ASSESSOR
61os PRESS HARD - YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES
M �
[!F—HRr CE Ell. >rAPPROVED BY PLANNING
0 �OT' �T R7
_ H �SP F ION 7, �'5 D (o
J__
01 S.
4ov Z
: -NAW
----- - 4ove-r AKP
Il F
z
z
0
WT
0 m
CID
m
0
80
c
q,
m
z
m
z
SOR
Po
SCH 40
)q 1 s F f. xvcm
N-12 :1 0
F8 11 HAN n�
44
ITIM
cv
I P T
0 M
C 0
M I-_ In C)
LLJ
—.AwkT— —Ea—- V
>
E'J MA
z
---------- -------
Z v 9--s
I 1 0
Rea ired
os t:l
R,-ar W 5
"ht
m a,
OWN.-FIXONTPIXTO-5 ro MA
EROSION CONTROL AND 01
NO Flag_h�&
Actual
6,41 -Fyoyyl
LA:
_0
A Q LA S, * A F t� V () C) C9 C) -,�, 1 0 q-
py
m ,
1.2
W
A,::, Ly.- r--
�5hLG�j bp —
aw- BLD'S�C40(p�e,
Vp lky-, vj A� 215 G
<AL MV69VIOUS
37.2,
T—
To
To MR FORM INC.
C: m
0
M
0
0
c
m m
O"n
mg
mm
0
0
o
C v)
M C)
Z
-4
IV
LIU ASSOCIATES 4862746
1AU & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering Geology Qe 0 t e
September 12. 2004
RESUB
Mr. Jim Itenricks
SEP 12 2005
c/o BDZ Developers, Inc.
3207 Pacific Avenue 'Ue',LT,"OGF:)rEDPMAO'TMENT
Nes
z
Fvcrctt, WA 98201
Dear Mr. Ilenricks:
0
'A -A
Subject: Site Stability and Setback Evaluation
Vi -4
X
Renovation ol'Single-Family Residence
m
In a
8711 Talbot Road
0
0
E dmonds, Washington
L&A Job No. 5AI 18
M
rn z
C
INTRODUCTION
ca
At your request, we have completed an evaluation of site stability a nd building setback from
"n
-n La
critical areas for the subject residencewhich is to be renovated. This cvaluation is based oil a
In m
review of the geologic and soil conditions of the site based on a p ublished geologic map and the
0
0 Fn
site conditions observed during our site visit. Presented in this letter are our lindings,
C Cn
m
z 0
conclusions and recommendations.
X
SITE CONDITIONS
>
z
The subject site iq a medium-higb-bluff property overlooking Puget Sound ill VdIllonds.
Washington. The site is mostly gently sloped down westward to the crest of a very-1cell
z
medium -high bluff bordering the west side of the site. The gently sloped portion of the she is
0
In
estimated at about 10 to 15 percent grade. and the steep bluff bordering the west side of the site is
close to 100 percent grade. The steep bluff is considered to be in critical areas. Ali cxisting
single-family residence. witha clay -tiled open patio abutting its west side, is sited over the gently
sloped portion of the site. The setbacks ol'the existing house and its patio from the crcst of the
19213 Kenlake Place NE Kenmore, WA 98028
Phone (425) 483-9134 Fax (425) 486-2746
LIU P. ASSOCIPTES 4862746 P.02
September 12, 2005
Mr, Jim lienricks
L&A Job No. 5AI 18
Page 2
steep bluff were measured to be 104.0 feet and 79.0 feet, respectively, dui -ing our site visit On
September 9, 2005. The unpaved area over the gently sloped portion of the site is- mostly
covered with IaNvn grass with occasional tall evergreen trees dotting its frineP. and the Steel)
z
bluff is mostly covered with dense shrubs,"d brush.
0
GEOLOGIC SETTING AND SOIL CONDITIONS
'4--5
3:
M
'the Geolo C Map th,��L-4,t Edrnondg and of llj� _Wtt rdnlpR _L-1.
C
M 0
-40
-hed by U. S. Geological Survey in 1981 was referenced
by James 11. Minard, publi�
0 -
-oil
for the geologic and soil conditions at the site. According to this publication. the surficial s
m M
0
unit at and in the vicinity ofthe residence site is mapped as Vashon Till (QN,j).
> Z
'the geology of the Puget Lo wland has been modified by the advance and retreat of several
0 -n
n�
glaciers in the past and the subsequent deposits and erosions. 'the most recent one was the
M m
Vashon glacier that retreated from the Puget Lowland about 14,500 years ago.
0
0
c:
The Vashon till soil unit was deposited directly by glacial ice during the most recent glacial
M 0
period,v., it advanced over an eroded. irregular sur face of older formations and sediments. It is a
very dense mixture of unsorted clay, silt, sand, gravel, and scattered cobbles and boulders. often
z
referred to as "hard pan". The Vashon till over the top two to three fact is weathered to a
co
medium dense state. and is moderately permeable and compressible. The underlying fresh till is
z
0
very dense and is practically impervious to storinwater infiltration. The fresh till has the strength
M
iins,
of low-grade concrete and call stand in a steep natural or cut slope for a long period. 11'ren),
% le
undisturbed and well -drained. the fresh till can provide excellent foundation support vi h itt
settlement expected.
LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC.
L�IU ASSOCIATES 4962746 P.03
September 12, 2005
Mr. Jim Ilenricks
L&A.lob No. SA 118
Pag e 3
SITE STABILITY
The .5ubject site is most likely underlain by very -dense, fresh till soils of high slicar strength at
shallow depth. The fresh till soils have very bigh resist,"cc against slope failurcs. It is our
z
q opinion that the risk for deep-seated landslides to occur on the site should be minimal. The
!V
potcntial for landslides can be further reduced by: 1) not allowing concentrated storn)%vater it) lie
T,
discharged onto the ground within the site or onto the steep bluff bordering the vvest side ul'the
M
sitc� 2) maintaining a wcIl-established vegetation cover over areas not paved and over the steep
0
0
blurf. 3) capturing stormwater runoff over impervious surfaces, such as roofs and paved
C
driveways with underground roof drain systems and catch basins in the driveways and
M
z
I discharging water into a storm sewer or a suitable slormwater disposal facility,
C
>
CA
BUILDING SETBACK
n
'n
m M
We understand that a new elevated wood deck is to be constructed off the wrcst ;ide ofthe house,
0 In-
and that the outer foundation supports ofthc deck will be extended about 14 feet beyond the wCA
o
0
side of the house. or about 90 feet from the crest of the steep bluff. The purpose of building
0
setback from the top or toe or an overly steep portion of a slope is to establish a satc buffer such
that ifa slope failure should occur the stability oftho structure can be maintained and (Nmagei in
the structure minimized. Based on the geologic and soil conditions ofthe Site as indicated on the
z
above-r6crenced geologic map, it is our opinion that the setback ofthe deck supporis at 90 1'ect
I*roni the crest of the steep bluff will he more than adequate, and that the construction ofthe deck
wilt not be in critical areas or have any significant impact on the nearby critical arems.
0
M
CONCLUSIONS
it is our conclusion that the site would remain stable for the proposed renovation or the subject
residence. It is also our conclusion that the Proposed wood deck is set back suffliciently frorn the
LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC.
UXU Q ASSOCIATgS 4862746 P.04
September 12, 2005
Nfr, Jim tlenricks
L&A,fob No. 5AI 18
Page 4
['the bluffand that the constructiorl ofthe deck will have little or no impact on nearby
crest steep
critical areas.
LIMITATIONS
z
This report is prepared for the specific application to the sub�jcct residence site and the exclusive
IT
use by Jim flenricks, and his associates, consultants and contractors. Our finding& cOnclUsirll
Vi -4
r the S te
and recurnmendations are preliminary in nature and are based on the conditions o i we
0 M
C
m
C
bserved and the geologic and soil condition indicated on the above-refercticed 9c logic in P.
0
-40
0
No subsurface exploration was done on the site.
C
ME M
M Z
�0 -4 ;1,111,
C
CLOSURt
We are pleased to be of service to YOU. Please call ifyou have any questions regarding this report
Vi
0 -n
-n �u
or need ftuther constiltation.
M M
a C—ft
0
Irks
Yours very truly,
0 M
lli>-, LIU & ASSOCIATES. INC.
rn 0
X
I SOLO
0A
z
'4 J S (Tulian) Liu, Ph.D., P.L.
C n ulting Geotechnical Engineer
0 q
V)
z
0
M
LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC.
JIU&ASS0CIATESJNC-
Fngineerinq Geolow
October 4, 2006
Mr. Jim Henricks
c/o 13DZ Developers, Tne.
3207 Pacific Avenue
Lvereit, WA 98201 z
0
Dear Mr. Henricks:
Subject; Fvaluation of Stairways Setback
Renovation of Single -Family Residence
711 Talbot Road
Fdmonds, Washington
L&A Job No. SAIIS
We understand. that the proposed renovation for the subject residence will include construction Of
a concrete patio and stairways abutting the rear of the house, and that the stairways will be set
back about 30 to 3 5 feet from the crest of the steep bluff bordering the West side of the residence
site. Presented in this letter is our opinion regarding die adequacy of this setback.
sidence
the re is located is
As presented in our 9/12/2005 report� the hillside on top of which
formed at shallow depth by veii-dense fresh till soils of high sbear strength and excellent
sed patio d , ir ay
i th po an sta W 3
resistance against slope failures. it is, therefore, our opinion if e Pro
are set back at least 20 feet from the top of bluff of slope 40% or more, they should have no
impact on the stability ofthe bluff� it should be noted, however, that the foundations Supporting
the stairways should be embedded at least 6 inches into the very -dense fresh till soils.
please call if you have any questions.
19213 Kenlake Place NE Kenmore. WA 98028
phone (425)483-9`134 Fax(425)486-2746
RESUB
OCT - 5 2006
11UPIDING DEPA%ENT
.W F ..
CITY copy
C In
m
0
80
C
M
M z
0-4
C
in
0 -n
'n
m In
a
0
0
C co
9 co
M 0
Z
M
I
z
z
0
m
October4,2006
Mr. Jim Henricks
L&A Job No. SAI 18
Page 2
01A 0;.
Yours vcry truly,
LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC.
J. G� (J.N-�) Liu, PILD., r6M.
z
Consulting Geotechnical Engincer
55 --j
m
0
0
c
N
m
M z
c 2
co
O'n
-n
M M
S,
0
0
MZ
'0-
55
z
z
m
LIU & ASSOCIATES,
INC.
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH -EDMONDS. WA98020 - (425) 771-0220 -FAX (425) 77 1 �0221
Websile: i.edM0ndSMa.M
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
�o Q, Planning Building Engineering
May 9, 2006
z
0
Jim Herricks
8711 Talbot Road
-4 -n
Edmonds, Washington 98026
C
RE: Retaining Wall
0
0
C
Dear Mr. Henricks:
K ':�
M
M Z
During a routine building inspection perfortned on your building permit #2006-0256, the City
C: z
Inspector noted that a retaining wall was proposed that was not shown on the approved site plan
-4 1";�
X
dated 3/28/06. The Inspector wrote a correction notice that required you to submit a revised plan
Cn
by 5/7/06. As of today the City is not in receipt of the revised plan. Please submit the revised
0 -n
plot plan by May 18, 2006 or indicate to the City in writing that you have decided not to pursue
the retaining wall.
m In
—
Ca
For your information I have enclosed the City public handout for retaining walls for your use.
0 M
Please note when a separate permit is required for retaining walls. If a retaining wall permit is
m
required submit a complete application and all applicable details by May 18'h as well.
Z r-
If you have any questions about the plot plan or retaining wall permit review process please
contact a Permit Coordinator at 425 -771-0220.
z
Sincerely,
z
Jeannine L. Graf
m
Building Official
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: —VCj,ed=ndS.WaMS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
117 8,)13 Planning Building - Engineering
June 12,2006
z
Jim Henricks
8711 Talbot Road
a m
C:
Edmonds, Washington 98026
M
-40
C
RE: Retaining Wall
11 K 1""
X M
M z
Dear Mr. Henricks:
0-4
C:
>
In response to City letter dated May 9, 2006 your contractor requested and was granted an
extension to June I" for the submittal of the retaining wall plan. However, as of this date the
0 n
City is not in receipt ofthe revised plan. Please submit the revised plot plan by June 21, 2006 or
n
-4
indicate to the City in writing that you have decided not to pursue the retaining wall.
3:9
M M
For your information I have previously provided the City public handout for retaining walls for
0,
0
your use. Please note when a separate permit is required for retaining walls. If a retaining wall
permit is required submit a complete application and all applicable details by June 2 Ist as well.
M 0
Z r-
If you have any questions about the plot plan or retaining wall permit review process please
contact a Permit Coordinator at 425-771-0220.
z
Sincerely,
ra
z
0
Jeannine L. Graf
0
M
Building Official
Incorporated August 11, 1890
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 77 "221
Websile� VA—dedmordsma.m
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building Engineering
Inc. 1 SCO
June 23, 2006
Z
0
=j
0
Jim Henricks
8711 Talbot Road
M
Edmonds, Washington 98026
M 0
RE: Retaining Wall
M
Dear Mr. Henricks:
M Z
C
>
As a follow-up to City letters May 9, 2006 and June 12, 2006 the City is awaiting the submittal
V—i
of a retaining wall plan. Please submit the revised plot plan by July 7, 2006 or indicate to the
0 -n
City in writing by this date that you have decided not to pursue the retaining wall.
-n T
It is not the City's intent to cause you undue hardship however compliance to the Codes is
m m
0—
mandatory for the fair and equal treatment of all citizens. Failure to respond by the July 7, 2006
0
0 rR
shall initiate the City's Civil Penalties process whereby fines may be assessed in order to gain
C U)
0)
code compliance. If there are circumstances beyond your control that will prevent you from
m 0
Z
responding by July 7, 2006 immediately inform my office and provide an alternate date of
compliance.
If you have any questions about the plot plan or retaining wall permit review process please
Z
contact a Permit Coordinator at 425-771-0220.
(a
Sincerely,
Z
0
m
Jeannine L. Graf
Building Official
Incorporated August 11, 1890
FROM FAX NO. Jul. 07 2006 08:19AM PI
bt
UnCEN"r fell COM
T imberbuilcl
0 e S
7/7/2006
City of Edmonds - Planning
z
Shawn Roten 1
Mike Snook inspector
son=—
F— 0M
Talbot Rd. The
ily residence @ 8711
Regarding permit 4 2006-0256 I-Tenricks single fam
oin g to be replaced by an
k side of the residence are now 9
retaining walls proposed at the bac at a later date, The earlier proposed
extensive landscaping plan to be drawn and submitted
ill not be con%tructed.
I retaining walls w
I Thanks, Shawn
1425-210-9884
RECEIVED
JUL 0 7 .2006
)EVELOPMENT SERV CES CTR-
CITY OF EDMOINDS
'flwe'?
llwa-
211, M akilt—, WA 08211 Ph 0-1-A47-041"'
M 'o
. , j�
4 C
M
M Z
> Z
E: :-j
'n
-n
M M
0 M
C (D
C cl)
Q 0
Z r-
M
z
z
9
0
M
E
ORY, INC�
C:ASCADETESTIIIG LA110RAT
TESTING & INSPECTION ... 58504
FIELD REPORT
TO:
RECEIVEu
JUL Z 7 2006
ATTN:
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR-
clTy OF EDMONDS
DATE
7-1a - 0
17Z, 7-0 a
PROJECT
77�4
LOCATION
E-,- -7 1Z
BLDG. PERMIT NO.
OWNER
WEATHER
TIMR AT AM
AT P.
ARCHITECT
CONTRACTOR
z
I
THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED:
c m
015-5;W-14-z� /-7-ZZ Ife
M 0
0 c:
m
Cft,/,9-6-�5,
5— --.y �Ze e, p 57 e6,1 _5
0 -n
/3,9>, ol j Z�,v -5
M
-49
U ;5 Aj
m m
0
1-7 /9L,—
0
c m
cf)
M 0
777-( .
........ ...
/9
>
z
4A, C, 12 1 -1 0 S—
�J,,L) P�'A� j C,//.5 1�2 e e-
z
0
m
CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC.
TESTING & INSPECTION PREVIOUS
—. 12611 PLACE REPORT N,..
129 11
�— AND. WASHINGTDN 90034 �425) 1323�9800
EVEPETT �25) 259�0817
DAT (51N
`7 H
FIELD REPORT
PROJE�
T-
6a o—'cu
BLDG. P ER
2�
WEATHER TEMP. AT A
AT PM
ENGINEER
it--cEl VED
A R C H I T E CS\�'
ATTN: -----
CONTRACTOR
Z
(2) 6TV EMM
INSPECTION PERFORMED
(3)
ITEMSINSPECTED FOUNDATIONS
m
c
RESTEEUCONCRETE EST EL ONLY
FOOTINGS _SLAB
rn 0
0
_je�WELDING
Rli5fEE MASONRY ST. T
U
AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS
0
c
STRLSTIBOLTING
DRILLED PIER IS — WALLS
m
m z
C
— BEAMS
1c)
(4) C3
r
cn
0 -n
-n �U
LOCATION IAREAS)
RAPC)z
-y-
A 6 C'�^
MITI
I
S
a
0
0 M
c ca
c cl)
M 0
656NCRETFJMASONRY MIX NO.
DESIGN STRENGTH (fc)
SUPPLIES
TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED
I,
SLUMP (INCHES)
SPECIMENS CAST
A C T
SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO.
z
ZY.S NO _.lEM...SPE.TEDW.I1. IN ... F.R.AN.E WITH ELDG, EPT.
APPROVED PLANE
e t
REMARKS:
c" 4,C
V
IZ
-A"y-
re
TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS
HEREIN TESTED, I" S REIORI SHALL NOI INSPECTOR(S). NAME(S) PRINTE
BE REPRODUCED VCEPT I FULL. �ITH-
OUT THE �RITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE
I EDITING LABORATORY. INC INSPECTOR SIGNATURE
REVISED 1105 SIGNED By
'zl
COPIES 0,
Structural Design Associates
22 10 Hewitt Ave, Suite 401
Everett, WA 98201
Phone: 425-339-0293
Fax: 425-252-0916
Sean Roten
Henricks Residence
1620 Washington Ave
Muldheo, WA 98270
0
Subject: Missed 3x plate
31
Permit #:
SDA Ref. 3761
Fn -4
x I I
a
m
C:
To whom this may concern:
m 0
0 0
C
At the request of Sean Roten this office reviewed the subject project for missed 3x plates.
m
All shearwalls may use a 2x plate with twice the anchor bolt connection per the shearwall
z
z
schedule. The contractor may opt to use the Titen HD bolts in place of anchor bolts for
these shearwalls. The #5 shearwall may use UFP 10 in place of anchor bolts. The #5
�
shearwall must also nail the sheathing to the rim joist at 3" on center each way.
0
"n
Please contact this office if you have any questions concerning this letter.
m m
0
Very truly yours,
0 m
OCI 19 2006
go
r
VINO
-CO
w
0
z
-04
343
R EC E IVE D
01"T 2 3
DEVELOPMU41' SERVICES CTR,
CITY OF EDMONDS
CASCADETESTING LABORATORY. INC.
TESTING & INSPECTION 5 8 50-d' -
N,
KLA --- I...
F_RE4
FIELD REPORT
TOt
'ATTN:
DA�T C T
PROJ OT
LOCATION
BLDG� PERMIT NO.
OWNER
WEATHER
0 Ll� IL
TEMP. AT AM
AT om
ENGINEER
ARCHITECT
CONTRACTOR
THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED:
0 m
1,zoejs >—c, z 3d K5,; j
0
80.
C"(/ lq-e
M
m
/Ze/2 .5 —1 lVe c- 0 -2,-- 5
CE
>
�F- I:- 6I�
3:
0
0 -n
I. j
MIT!
0 r
m
r co
M 0
?Y- 7- /-z 7 Iq
J
k-/*Q
0
jUt 7 2007
HEREINemoweDuamEHALL OT INSPECTOR(S), NAMES) PRINTED
I llpl,,Ulll EXCEPT IN FULL 11TH,
OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE INSPECTOR SIGNATURE
TESTING LABORATORY, INC.
.-EEG SIGNED By
COPIES TO:
I n � H
rermIL nspecl, on
,4�
Permit: BLD20060256
PERMIT
1077- F-Eingineering Final
07/10/2007 Sibrel
30 Correction. engr final complete less: connecting dmnspout to tightfine on
S side of SFR; and
N
paling dwy accesses.
07/1712007 Sibrel
0 OK to final
Y
Total Time:
30
1106, B-Setbicks'
Complete?
�Y
04107/2006 MS
20 SETBACKS APPROVED PER STRUNG PROPERTY LINES
y
Total Time:
20
1108.-B-Footings,
C rnplete?
OVOW2006 MS
20 FOOTINGS APPROVED FOR 13UILDING ONLY
Y
Total Time:
20
It a
1110 - B-Founda lonW 11
CornialIate
0 1 4 . /13/ 1 2 1 006 J I R
20 FOUNDATION APPROVED FOR BUILDING ONLY
Y
Total Time:
20
1118 - B-Slablifisulat, lon;.�
Corn
'y
lojll/�666 Snook
26 'APPROVED
Y
Total Time;
20
1126-8-PIuInhGnoun& ork11-:
05/2512006 MS
25 N DERGROUNb PLUMBING APPROVED
y
Total Time:
25
1126 EfaPlurnb Rough ln�
Coinpierle?z
09/ 1 0812 1 0 06 MS
25 CORRECTION NOTICE WRFrrEN
N
10/11/2006 Snook
20 APPROVED
y
Total Time:
45
11 n -.8-Gas Test/Plpe,
09/0812006 MS
20 CORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN
N
lo/11/2006 Snook
20 CORRECTION NOTICE ISSUED
N
10131/2006 Snook
25 CORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN
N
1110312006 Snook
20 APPROVED
Y
Total Time!
as
1132 - El -Exterior Sheathing
I' te
Compe,
y
07/05/2006 MS,
25 EXTERIOR SHEATHING APPROVED
Total Time:
25
1136 - B-Shear Nailing
1
Complaete?�,.�`
0710512006 MS
20 CORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN
08124/2006 MS
20 NO ACCESS
N
10111/2006 Snook
20 CORRECTION NOTICE ISSUED
N
10123/2006 Snook
20 APPROVED
y
Total Time:
80
1142 - B-Framing
Complete?
10/11/2006 Snook
35 CORRECTION NOTICE ISSUED
N
1012312006 Snook
25 CORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN
N
10/3112006 Snook
25 CORRECTION NOTICE WRITTEN
N
111OX2006 Snook
20 APPROVED
y
Total Time:
105
1144 - B-Wall Insulation/Caulk.
Complete?
y
1110312006 Snook
20 APPROVED
Total Time:
20
6111/2009 2:25:02 PM
Page I of 2
z
0
ITI
3:
In
mo
0
-40
0 C
-4 K
3: In
In
0
z
-4
O,n
n
-i
3:
ng ITI
a
0
0
0)
ITI 0
Z
z
-4
z
0
I
0
IT
114 r sitil.a"il iii ik'
e4
1I/0k006 Snook
20 APPROVED
Total Time:
20
et k! �r
-She roe t4ali
Z_'.
11103/2006 Snook
20 APPROVED
y
Total Time:
20
in ,n__
Y�
'0ji0q1�607-1
e.dMn
30 WROTE CORRECTION
07117/2007 READWIN
30 APPROVED
Total Time:
60
Total Inspections: 27
Total Time:
595
M
M
0
0
in
M z
q
0 -n
-n 23
M IT
a
0
0
I= 0)
M 0
r—
In
Page 2 of 2
611112009 2:25M PM
777777�1
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED
SETBACKS .................
FOUNDATION:
Footing ..............
Wall . .......... ..............
Piet/Porch .................
Retaining Wall ...........
z
Slab Insulation
0
RI
PLUMBING:
Underground
Rough
0 x
-in . . ...........
IT!
CM:
Commercial Final
-0(0
0
0 cc:
HEATING:
--j
xM MGas
Test
z
Gas Piping ..........
c
Equipment
r 3:
:� —
CD
Commercial Final
0,n
n
I
EXTERIOR SHEATHING
-S
IT
NAILING ...........
0 _Cf)
0
FRAMING ..............
r
ITI
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING
C= Cf)
C/)
Q 0
INSULATION ...................
Z
4
Floor Insulation
M
__4
Wall Insulation ...........
3:
>
z
Ceiling Insulation
SHEETROCK NAILING
0)
z
SPECIAL INSPECTION
ITI
MISCELLANEOUS ..........
FINAL APPROVAL FOR
J2_
7-07
OCCUPANCY ...............
60000",